0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views

2019Spring_LA_WK13_THR_v2

The document discusses properties of unitary matrices, including the orthogonality of eigenvectors associated with distinct eigenvalues, similarity transformations, and the invariance of determinants and spectra under such transformations. It also covers Schur's lemma, normal matrices, and the spectral theorem, emphasizing that normal matrices can be diagonalized by unitary matrices. Additionally, it provides proofs and examples related to these concepts.

Uploaded by

1jeongk
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views

2019Spring_LA_WK13_THR_v2

The document discusses properties of unitary matrices, including the orthogonality of eigenvectors associated with distinct eigenvalues, similarity transformations, and the invariance of determinants and spectra under such transformations. It also covers Schur's lemma, normal matrices, and the spectral theorem, emphasizing that normal matrices can be diagonalized by unitary matrices. Additionally, it provides proofs and examples related to these concepts.

Uploaded by

1jeongk
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

Theorem

Eigenvectors of a unitary matrix associated with distinct eigenvalues are


mutually orthogonal.

Proof
Let U be a unitary matrix, and u, v eigenvectors of U associated with
distinct eigenvalues λ, µ ∈ C, respectively. Then

λ∗ µhu|v i = hλu|µv i = hUu|Uv i = hu|v i.

If hu|v i =
6 0, then we can divide by hu|v i, giving

λ∗ µ = 1.

Since |λ| = 1, multiplying both sides by λ gives

µ = |λ|2 µ = λλ∗ µ = λ,

a contradiction. Hence, hu|v i = 0, i.e., u ⊥ v .


1 / 20
Exercise
Prove the following:
1 If U and V are unitary, then UV is unitary.
2 If U is unitary, then U H is unitary.
3 If A is Hermitian and U is unitary, then U H AU is Hermitian.

2 / 20
5.6 Similarity Transformations

Definition
Let A be a square matrix. A transformation of the type
A S −1 AS
is called a similarity transformation. If
B = S −1 AS,
then A is said to be similar to B, and we will write
A ∼ B.

Note
(Reflexivity) A ∼ A
(Symmetry) A ∼ B =⇒ B∼A
(Transitivity) A ∼ B and B ∼ C =⇒ A∼C

3 / 20
Change of Basis
The matrix representation of a linear transformation

T :V →V

with respect to a basis α undergoes a similarity transformation when the


basis is changed α β:

[T ]α [T ]β = [IdV ]βα [T ]α [IdV ]αβ = S −1 [T ]α S

IdV IdV $
V /V T /V /V
ρβ ρα ρα ρβ


 [IdV ]α  [T ]α  [IdV ]β 
Cn
β
/ Cn / Cn
α
/ n
9C
[T ]β

4 / 20
Change of Basis (cont’d.)
Conversely, the similarity transformation

A S −1 AS

may be interpreted as a result of the change of basis

e α,

where α is the basis consisting of the columns of S:

A = [A]e [A]α = [IdCn ]αe [A]e [IdCn ]eα = S −1 AS

Note
The diagonalization of a matrix is the result of changing the standard
basis to an eigenvector basis.

5 / 20
Invariance of Determinant under Similarity Transformation
From
det Q −1 AQ = det A,
we see that
A∼B =⇒ det A = det B

Invariance of Spectrum under Similarity Transformation


From
pQ −1 AQ (λ) = pA (λ),
we see that
A∼B =⇒ Spec A = Spec B

6 / 20
Theorem
There is an isomorphism of eigenspaces

→ Eλ (Q −1 AQ),
Eλ (A) − x 7→ Q −1 x .

Proof
If x ∈ Eλ (A), then Ax = λx , so
(Q −1 AQ)(Q −1 x ) = Q −1 Ax = λ(Q −1 x ).
Hence,
Q −1 x ∈ Eλ (Q −1 AQ),
and there is a function
Eλ (A) → Eλ (Q −1 AQ), x 7→ Q −1 x , (∗)
which is clearly linear. Similarly, there is a linear transformation
Eλ (A) ← Eλ (Q −1 AQ), Qx ←[ x ,
which is the inverse of (∗).
7 / 20
Corollary
If x is an eigenvector of A, then Q −1 x is an eigenvector of Q −1 AQ
associated with the same eigenvalue.

x ∈ Eλ (A) =⇒ Q −1 x ∈ Eλ (Q −1 A)

8 / 20
Exponentiation and Similarity Transformation
From
−1 AQ
eQ = Q −1 e A Q,
we see that
A∼B =⇒ eA ∼ eB .

9 / 20
Theorem
Tr AB = Tr BA

Proof
n
X n X
X n n X
X n
Tr AB = (AB)ii = Aij B ji = B ji Aij
i=1 i=1 j=1 i=1 j=1
Xn Xn Xn
= B ji Aij = (BA)jj = Tr BA
j=1 i=1 j=1

Corollary
Tr Q −1 AQ = Tr A

Remark
It folllows that the trace is invariant under similarity transformation:

A∼B =⇒ Tr A = Tr B
10 / 20
Schur’s Lemma
For every square matrix A, there exists a unitary matrix U such that

U H AU

is an upper triangular matrix.

Note
Every square matrix is unitarily similar to an upper triangular matrix.

Issai Schur (1875 – 1941) was a Russian mathematician who worked in Germany.

11 / 20
Proof
Let λ1 , . . . , λn be the eigenvalues of A, and v1 an eigenvector of A
associated with λ1 . We may extend v1 to a basis v1 , . . . , vn , and apply
Gram-Schmidt to convert it to an orthonormal basis u1 , . . . , un .
v1 v1 , . . . , vn u1 , . . . , un
Au1 = λ1 u1 , and Au2 , . . . , Aun are linear combinations of u1 , . . . , un , so
   
| | | | " #
 λ1 ∗
A u1 · · · un  = u1 · · · un 
  
0 B
| | | |
for some (n − 1) × (n − 1) matrix B. Now,
 
| |
U := u1 · · · un 
 
| |
is unitary, and
12 / 20
Proof (cont’d.)
" #
λ ∗
U AU = 1
H
.
0 B
It follows that
pU H AU (λ) = (λ1 − λ) det(B − λI).
On the other hand,

pU H AU (λ) = pA (λ) = (λ − λ1 ) · · · (λ − λn ),

so
pB (λ) = det(B − λI) = (λ − λ2 ) · · · (λ − λn ).
Hence, the eigenvalues of B are λ2 , . . . , λn . By the same argument,
" #
λ ∗
V H BV = 2 ,
0 C

where V is a unitary matrix, and C is an (n − 2) × (n − 2) matrix.


13 / 20
Proof (cont’d.)
Then
" # " # " #" #" #
1 0 1 0 1 0 λ1 ∗ 1 0
U H AU =
0 VH 0 V 0 VH 0 B 0 V

" #
λ ∗
= 1
0 V H BV

 
λ1 ∗ ∗
=  0 λ2 ∗  .
 
0 0 C

Note that
" #H " # " # " #−1
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
= = = .
0 V 0 VH 0 V −1 0 V
14 / 20
Proof (cont’d.)
Hence, " #
1 0
V̂ :=
0 V
is unitary. Note that
 
λ1 ∗ ∗ " # " #
1 0 H 1 0
 0 λ2 ∗  = U AU
 
0 VH 0 V
0 0 C

H
= V̂ U H AU V̂ = (U V̂ )H A(U V̂ ),
and U V̂ is unitary. We continue this way, until we obtain
λ1 ∗ ∗
 
 ..
W AW =  . . . .
H
∗ ,

0 ··· λn
where W is a unitary matrix.
15 / 20
Corollary
det exp A = exp Tr A

Remark
We know this is true for upper triangular matrices. (Week 12, THR)

Proof
By Schur’s lemma,
A∼T
for some upper triangular matrix T , so

exp A ∼ exp T ,

and therefore

det exp A = det exp T = exp Tr T = exp Tr A.

16 / 20
Note
If A is a real matrix with only real eigenvalues, then the proof of Schur’s
lemma goes through, producing a real upper triangular matrix of the form

Q T AQ,

where Q is an (real) orthogonal matrix.

Theorem
Every real symmetric matrix is orthogonally diagonalizable.

Proof
Let A be a real symmetric matrix. Then it is Hermitian, so its eigenvalues
are real. Hence, by the preceding note, there is a real upper triangular
matrix of the form
Q T AQ,
where Q is (real) orthogonal. But Q T AQ is symmetric, so it must be
diagonal.
17 / 20
Normal Matrices

Definition
An n × n matrix is said to be normal if it has n orthonormal eigenvectors.

Note
Every normal matrix is complete.

Note
A is normal if and only if it can be diagonalized by a unitary matrix U:

U H AU = Λ

We say that normal matrices are unitarily diagonalizable.

18 / 20
Theorem (Spectral Theorem)
If A is normal, then X
A= λ pEλ (A) .
λ∈Spec A

Proof
Let A be an n × n normal matrix, and u1 , . . . , un ∈ Cn its orthonormal
eigenvectors. Then
I = pCn = u1 u1H + · · · + un unH ,
so
A = Au1 u1H + · · · + Aun unH = λ1 u1 u1H + · · · + λn un unH

n
X X
= λi phui i = λ pEλ (A) .
i=1 λ∈Spec A

19 / 20
Example
 
4 0 0
A = 0 4 0
 
0 0 5
has orthonormal eigenvectors e1 , e2 , e3 associated with eigenvalues 4, 4, 5,
respectively. The eigenspaces are

E4 (A) = he1 , e2 i and E5 (A) = he3 i,

and the projections onto them are

pE4 (A) = e1 e1H + e2 e2H and pE5 (A) = e3 e3H .

Hence,

A = 4e1 e1H + 4e2 e2H + 5e3 e3H


= 4(e1 e1H + e2 e2H ) + 5e3 e3H
= 4pE4 (A) + 5pE5 (A) .
20 / 20

You might also like