Student-Centered-vs.-Teacher-Centered-Learning
Student-Centered-vs.-Teacher-Centered-Learning
Educators know the difference and many are adept at integrating aspects of
both approaches into their teaching. However, as with anything, it is often helpful to have
a quick refresher.
Sounds fairly traditional, right? This should paint a picture of a classic schoolroom
in which the teacher presides over his or her pupils. But there’s a different — and
potentially more successful — alternative.
A student-centered classroom may possess some or all of these qualities and may
not work for every learning scenario. Some teachers and students may find student-
centered learning too chaotic, but testing out a healthy mix of teacher-centered and
student-centered methods may be the key to success.
Sometimes called the “Sage on the Stage” style, the teacher-centered model
positions the teacher as the expert in charge of imparting knowledge to his or her
students via lectures or direct instruction. In this setting, students are sometimes described
as “empty vessels,” listening to and absorbing information.
This approach, which has grown in popularity over the past several decades,
champions student choice and facilitates connections among students, embracing the
philosophy that, for a student to truly learn, they must be actively involved in the process.
But in the mid-80s, she said, a “new idea” called student-centered education
began to gain traction. As a writing teacher, she was aware of “the essential difference
between teaching a skill and teaching content,” believing that while “you can tell
people content; people must practice skills.”
To learn a skill, like writing for example, “students must be directly involved,” she
says. “No teacher can stand there and tell the students how to do something and expect
the students to leave the classroom able to do it.” However, because the teacher must
willingly relinquish some control of the process and count on students to produce,
Kennedy says, “Student-centered teaching feels risky.”
She recalls occasionally having to convince supervisors that her methods were
sound, with one dean describing what appeared to be “total chaos” after sitting in on a
four-hour class where students were haggling over ideas, some listening to music, taking
breaks at times of their choosing and basically owning their approach to the assignment.
She was able to convince the dean that listening to music helped some kids focus and
that letting them take a breather when needed was preferable to potentially disrupting
their train of thought with a scheduled group break.
“Over the years I came to understand that the main virtue of the student-centered
classroom is that it removes mastery from the sole province of the teacher and allows
students to be masters, too,” she said. “It means I needed to — sometimes — leave them
alone so they could learn. I understood that teachers can actually impede students’
learning.”
Reference:
https://onlinedegrees.sandiego.edu/teacher-centered-vs-student-centered-learning/