Instant ebooks textbook (Ebook) Control of Nonlinear Systems via PI, PD and PID: Stability and Performance by Yong-Duan Song (Author) ISBN 9780429455070, 9780429847622, 9780429847639, 9780429847646, 9781138317642, 0429455070, 0429847629, 0429847637, 0429847645 download all chapters
Instant ebooks textbook (Ebook) Control of Nonlinear Systems via PI, PD and PID: Stability and Performance by Yong-Duan Song (Author) ISBN 9780429455070, 9780429847622, 9780429847639, 9780429847646, 9781138317642, 0429455070, 0429847629, 0429847637, 0429847645 download all chapters
com
DOWLOAD EBOOK
ebooknice.com
ebooknice.com
https://ebooknice.com/product/sat-ii-success-
math-1c-and-2c-2002-peterson-s-sat-ii-success-1722018
ebooknice.com
ebooknice.com
(Ebook) Cambridge IGCSE and O Level History Workbook 2C -
Depth Study: the United States, 1919-41 2nd Edition by
Benjamin Harrison ISBN 9781398375147, 9781398375048,
1398375144, 1398375047
https://ebooknice.com/product/cambridge-igcse-and-o-level-history-
workbook-2c-depth-study-the-united-states-1919-41-2nd-edition-53538044
ebooknice.com
ebooknice.com
ebooknice.com
ebooknice.com
Control of Nonlinear
Systems via PI, PD and
PID
Stability and Performance
i i
i i
i i
Series Editors
FRANK L. LEWIS, Ph.D., SHUZHI SAM GE, Ph.D.,
Fellow IEEE, Fellow IFAC Fellow IEEE
Professor Professor
The Univeristy of Texas Research Institute Interactive Digital Media Institute
The University of Texas at Arlington The National University of Singapore
STJEPAN BOGDAN
Professor
Faculty of Electrical Engineering
and Computing
University of Zagreb
i i
i i
i i
Control of Nonlinear
Systems via PI, PD and
PID
Stability and Performance
Yong-Duan Song
i i
i i
i i
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable
efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot
assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and
publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication
and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any
copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any
future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced,
transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or
hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information
storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access
www.copyright.com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
(CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization
that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted
a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and
are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
i i
i i
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
Contents
Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiii
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Preview of Chapters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
vii
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
viii Contents
4.3.1 PI Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
4.4 Adaptive Fault-tolerant PI Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
4.4.1 PI Control under Actuator Failures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
4.4.2 PI Control under Actuator and Sensor Faults . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
4.5 Illustrative Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
4.6 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
Contents ix
10 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
Visit https://ebooknice.com to
discover a wide range of
eBooks across various genres.
Enjoy exclusive deals and
discounts to enhance your
reading experience. Start your
digital reading journey today!
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
Preface
The proportional integral derivative (PID) controller in the form we know it today
emerged between 1915 and 1940. Since PID control is simple in structure and
inexpensive in implementation, it has been undoubtedly the most widely employed
controller in industry. In fact, PID controllers are sufficient for many control
problems, particularly when process dynamics are benign and the performance
requirements are modest. However, there are still problems that limit the
applications of the PID controller. One of those is how to determine the appropriate
PID gains to ensure system stability and desirable performance. The
Ziegler–Nichols tuning procedure, published in 1942, is simple and intuitive, but it
creates a closed-loop system that is very poorly damped and that has poor stability
margins. Since then, various methods for tuning PID gains have been suggested, but
a systematic means is yet to be established and the information about those methods
is scattered in the control theory.
With the increasing control demands for various practical systems which are
generally nonlinear, uncertain and with abnormal actuation (such as asymmetric
saturation, dead-zone module, loss of effectiveness, etc.), traditional PID control
seems to lack theoretical support and is losing efficiency. Thus, a series of control
strategies is proposed to tackle the control problems for all kinds of nonlinear
systems. Although various control schemes have successfully addressed the control
problems for nonlinear systems, the resultant solutions seem quite sophisticated —
not only complicated in structure, but also expensive in computation. As a
consequence, these complex control methods are not much appreciated in practical
applications. By this token, the PID control seems still the most favorable choice for
the control of practical systems if it could be made effective in dealing with system
nonlinearities and uncertainties.
Industrial experience has clearly indicated that automatic tuning of PID gains is
a highly desirable and useful feature. Therefore, the focus of this book is on
PI/PD/PID controller for nonlinear systems with self-tuning gains, wherein an
exposition of adaptive PI/PD/PID control methods developed recently for numerous
nonlinear systems is provided. All these PI/PD/PID controllers are able to
adaptively update the gains through analytic algorithms and there is no need for
xi
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
xii Preface
human tuning or trial and error process. Besides, the stability condition (the primary
concern for any control system) is established for the corresponding systems with
PI/PD/PID controller in the loop. Furthermore, in order to make the control scheme
more reliable in practical applications, in this book, the proposed PID control
strategies are equipped with fault-tolerant capabilities to accommodate the
abnormal actuation characteristics which may occur during system operation.
Constraints (due to physical saturation, safety specifications, etc.) imposed on
system outputs or states, together with the issue of prescribed control performance,
are also considered in control design. In the last chapters of the book, the
PI/PD/PID control scheme is applied to practical systems such as high-speed trains
and robotic systems. The effectiveness of the proposed adaptive PI/PD/PID
controller is demonstrated and validated via computer simulations. Several books
on PID controllers are available on the market, but this book exclusively focuses on
PI/PD/PID control with gain auto-tuning mechanisms for nonlinear systems. While
efforts have been made on PI/PD/PID control for nonlinear systems, there is still
much room for further research and development. We hope that this book will aid in
understanding the essence of PID control, providing readers with alternative
perspectives concerning the development of PI/PD/PID controllers for typical
nonlinear systems.
Yongduan Song
Chongqing, China
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
Acknowledgments
There are numerous individuals without whose help this book would not have been
completed. My sincere thanks go to Dr. Yujuan Wang, Dr. Danyong Li, Qing Chen,
Zhirong Zhang, Ziyun Shen, Ye Cao, Shuyan Zhou, Xiucai Huang, Kai Zhao. In
particular, I would like to express my gratitude to the following authors for allowing
me to use the materials of the papers for compiling this book.
• Y. D. Song, Y. J. Wang, and C. Y. Wen, “Adaptive fault-tolerant PI tracking
control with guaranteed transient and steady-state performance,” IEEE Trans.
Autom. Control, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 481-487, 2017.
• Q. Song, Y. D. Song, “Generalized PI control design for a class of unknown
nonaffine systems with sensor and actuator faults,” Syst. Control Lett., vol. 64,
no. 1, pp. 86-95, 2014.
• Y. D. Song, J. X. Guo, and X. C. Huang, “Smooth neuroadaptive PI tracking
control of nonlinear systems with unknown and nonsmooth actuation
characteristics,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 28, no. 9, pp.
2183-2195, 2017.
• Y. D. Song, Z. Y. Shen, L. He, and X. C. Huang, “Neuroadaptive control of strict
feedback systems with full-state constraints and unknown actuation
characteristics: an inexpensive solution”, IEEE Trans. Cybern., DOI:
10.1109/TCYB.2017.2759498.
• Y. D. Song, X. C. Huang, and C. Y. Wen, “Robust adaptive fault-tolerant PID
control of MIMO nonlinear systems with unknown control direction,” IEEE
Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 4876-4884, 2017.
• Y. D. Song, X. C. Yuan, “Low-cost adaptive fault-tolerant approach for semiactive
suspension control of high-speed trains,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 63, no.
11, pp. 7084-7093, 2016.
I also would like to thank the Research Institute of Intelligent Systems at
Chongqing University for their support.
The writing of this book was supported in part by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China.
xiii
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
Acronyms
Abbreviations
Notations
R field of real numbers
Σ summation
|a| the absolute of a scalar a
kxk the norm of a vector x
max maximum
min minimum
sup supremum, the least upper bound
inf infimum, the greatest lower bound
∀ for all
∈ belongs to
→ tends to
< (>) less (greater) than
≤ (≥) less (greater) than or equal to
≪ (≫) much less (greater) than
Rn the n−dimensional Euclidean space
ẏ the first derivative of y with respect to time
ÿ the second derivative of y with respect to time
y(i) the i−th derivative of y with respect to time
w.r.t. with respect to
xv
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
xvi Acronyms
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1 Motivation
Fig. 1.1 Classical PID controller in a feedback loop. r(t) is the desired process input or setpoint,
y(t) is the measured process output, u(t) is the control input, and e(t) = r(t)− y(t) is the discrepancy
between the setpoint and the output.
In PID control, the P-control (proportional control) is the action based on current
behavior of the system, I-control (integral control) is the accumulated effort using
the experience information of bygone state, whereas D-control (derivative control)
is the predictive effort based on the tendency information for the ongoing state.
Since the Ziegler and Nichols’ PID tuning rules were published in 1942, the PID
control has survived the challenge of advanced control theories. The PID’s long life
comes from its clear meaning and effectiveness in practice; thus the PI/PD/PID
control has been widely accepted in industry. Especially, it is suitable for control
systems that can establish accurate mathematical models. However, most practical
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
2 1 Introduction
industrial processes are nonlinear, uncertain, and are difficult to establish accurate
mathematical models for. Thus, the traditional PID gains tuning methods cannot
obtain optimal control performance. To deal with this problem, various PID gains
self-tuning methods have been suggested. Though the PI/PD/PID control has been
widely accepted in industry, PI/PD/PID control itself is still short of the theoretical
basis, e.g., the optimality of PI/PD/PID control, performance tuning rules of
PI/PD/PID control, and automatic performance tuning methods have not been
clearly presented especially for the trajectory tracking control of nonlinear systems.
Our interest in revisiting PI/PD/PID control is largely motivated by the fact that,
although various advanced control methods have been developed during the past
decades, the preferred one in engineering practice is still the PI/PD/PID control, due
to its simplicity in structure and intuitiveness in concept. It has gained wide
application in practical engineering systems. However, the well-known PI/PD/PID
control exhibits two major drawbacks that restrict its application to more general
systems. The first one is the determination of the PI/PD/PID gains for a given
system is an ad hoc and painstaking process. Thus far, there exists no systematic
means to guide the determination of such gains that ensure system stability and
performance, although various methods for tuning PI/PD/PID gains have been
suggested in the literature. The second one is that although PI/PD/PID control has
been demonstrated to be quite effective in dealing with certain linear time-invariant
systems, its applicability to nonlinear systems remains unclear and lacks theoretical
insurance for closed-loop system stability and performance. Furthermore, it is
desirable or required to equip such PI/PD/PID schemes with adaptive and
fault-tolerant capabilities yet guaranteeing transient performance.
1.2 Objectives
Firstly, this book attempts to provide readers with an overview of the basic principle
of PID control. Traditional PID control is characterized with constant PID gains and
is oriented for set point regulation; thus it seldom works satisfactorily for general
nonlinear systems with uncertain dynamics and unpredictable disturbances. Besides,
stability has always been the major concern with traditional PID control due to the
lack of the systematic procedure for determining the proper stability-ensured PID
gains for a given dynamic system.
Secondly, through detail theoretical analysis and technical development, this
book intends to show how conventional PI/PD/PID controllers could be extended
and generalized to deal with various systems, such as SISO nonlinear systems,
SISO nonaffine systems, and MIMO nonlinear systems. The emphasis is on how to
enable these controllers with the capabilities of tuning their gains automatically to
compensate for system uncertainties and reject external disturbances. Furthermore,
as nonsmooth actuation characteristics or actuation failures (partial loss of
effectiveness (PLOE) or total loss of effectiveness (TLOE) ) might occur during
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
system operation, effort is also made on designing PI/PD/PID control with adaptive
and fault-tolerant capabilities.
In Chapter 2, a brief review of the traditional PID control with fixed gains is
presented.
In Chapter 3, a generalized PI control with adaptively adjusting gains is
presented for single input single output (SISO) nonlinear systems. We consider two
control schemes: one is for the first-order nonlinear system; the other is for the
high-order nonlinear system. Besides, the developed PI controller is suitable for
nonlinear systems with undetectable disturbances and actuation failures.
Meanwhile, the pre-scribed transient and steady-state performances are
dynamically maintained.
In Chapter 4, a generalized adaptive PI control is developed for unknown
nonaffine dynamic systems. As the control inputs enter into and influence the
dynamic behavior of the nonaffine system in a nonlinear and implicit way, control
design for such systems becomes quite challenging. The proposed control is able to
accommodate both sensor and actuator faults.
In Chapter 5, neuro-adaptive PI control algorithms with self-tuning gains are
developed for a class of multi-input multi-output (MIMO) normal-form nonlinear
systems subject to unknown actuation characteristics and external disturbances. It is
shown that the proposed neuro-adaptive PI control is continuous and smooth
everywhere and ensures the uniform ultimate boundedness of all the signals of the
closed-loop system. Furthermore, the crucial compact set precondition for a neural
network (NN) to function properly is guaranteed with the barrier Lyapunov function
(BLF), allowing the NN unit to play its learning/approximating role during the
entire system operation.
In Chapter 6, a neuro-adaptive PI control for a class of uncertain nonlinear strict
feedback systems with full-state constraints and unknown actuation characteristics
is presented. In order to deal with the modeling uncertainties and the actuation
characteristics impact, the neural networks are utilized at each step of the back
stepping design procedure.
In Chapter 7, it is shown that the structurally simple and computationally
inexpensive PID control, popular with SISO linear time-invariant systems, can be
generalized and extended to control nonlinear MIMO systems with nonparametric
uncertainties and actuation failures. By utilizing the Nussbaum-type function and
the matrix decomposition technique, non-square systems with unknown control
direction are also considered.
In Chapter 8, the PD-like controller is designed for a high-speed train system.
The situation is further complicated if actuation faults occur. The resultant control
scheme is capable of automatically generating the intermediate control parameters
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
Visit https://ebooknice.com to
discover a wide range of
eBooks across various genres.
Enjoy exclusive deals and
discounts to enhance your
reading experience. Start your
digital reading journey today!
✐ ✐
4 1 Introduction
and literally producing the PD-like controller. The whole process does not require
precise information regarding system model or system parameter.
In Chapter 9, the robust adaptive PID controller is applied to a robotic system.
Under the proposed PID-like control the vibrations are effectively suppressed in the
presence of parametric uncertainties and varying operation conditions.
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
Chapter 2
Classical PID Control
In this chapter, the structure of the PID controller and the roles of the three
(proportional, integral, and derivative) terms of the PID controller, together with the
tuning of the PID gains, are discussed.
The proportional control action is proportional to the current control error, which can
be expressed as
u(t) = K p e(t) = K p (r(t) − y(t)) (2.2)
where K p is the proportional gain. The role of such control is quite obvious since it
implements the typical operation of increasing the control effort when the control
error is large (with appropriate sign). The transfer function of a proportional
controller can be derived trivially as
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
C(s) = K p (2.3)
If K p is made large, the steady-state error would be small. But the dynamic response
would become worse because the damping is too low. Apparently, a proportional
controller has the advantage of providing a small control input when the control error
is small and therefore can avoid excessive control efforts. The main drawback of
using a pure proportional controller is that it produces a steady-state error. It is worth
noting that this would still occur even if the process bears an integrating dynamics
(i.e., its transfer function has a pole at the origin of the complex plane), in case a
constant load disturbance occurs. This motivates the addition of a bias (or reset)
term ub , namely, [1, 2, 3]
u(t) = K p e(t) + ub (2.4)
The value of ub can be fixed at a constant level (usually at (umax + umin )/2) or can
be adjusted manually until the steady-state error is reduced to zero, where umax and
umin denote the maximum and minimum value of the control input, respectively.
The integral action is proportional to the integral of the control error, i.e.,
Z t
u(t) = Ki e(τ )d τ (2.5)
0
where Ki is the integral gain. With the integral action, the resultant control makes use
of the past values of the control error to generate its control signal. The corresponding
transfer function is:
Ki
C(s) = (2.6)
s
The presence of a pole at the origin of the complex plane allows the steady-state
error to be reduced to zero when a step reference signal is applied or a step load
disturbance occurs. In other words, the integral action is able to set automatically
the correct value of ub in (2.4) so that the steady-state error is zero [1]. This actually
results in a PI controller with the following transfer function
1
C(s) = K p (1 + ) (2.7)
Ti s
where Ti is integration time constant. The block diagram in Fig. 2.1 shows how
integral action is implemented using positive feedback with a first-order system.
The controller output is low-pass-filtered and feed back with positive gain. The
integral action is used to generate the bias term ub in (2.4) in the proportional
controller automatically, often called automatic reset. For this reason the integral
action is also often called automatic reset. Thus, the use of a proportional action in
conjunction to an integral action, i.e., a PI controller, solves the main problems of
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
de(t)
u(t) = Kd (2.8)
dt
where Kd is the derivative gain, which makes use of the predicted future values of
the control error. The corresponding controller transfer function is
C(s) = Kd s (2.9)
Upon using Euler formula to approximate the derivative in (2.8), it is derived that
de(t)
e(t + Td ) ≃ e(t) + Td (2.10)
dt
de(t)
u(t) = K p (e(t) + Td ) (2.11)
dt
then the control input at time t is actually based on the predicted value of the control
error at time t +Td . In order words, the controller (2.11) consisting of P and D terms is
able to enhance the transient response of the closed-loop system. For this reason the
derivative action is also called anticipatory control, or rate action, or pre-act [1]. It
should be stressed that although the derivative action has great potential in improving
the control performance as it can anticipate an incorrect trend of the control error and
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
counteract it, it also creates some critical issues that should be carefully addressed in
control design in practice.
As the structure of the PID controller is fixed, the tuning of its PID gains should be
carefully considered for different applications with various requirements. By
properly tuning the three parameters, a PID controller can deal with specific process
requirements. There is no uniform method for tuning the PID gains. The most
commonly used one is the “trial-and-error” tuning, which starts with determining
the proportional gain K p first, then trying to find the integral time constant Ti and
the derivative time constant Td , with which the integral gain Ki is obtained by
Ki = K p /Ti and the derivative gain Kd is set as Kd = Td K p .
The Ziegler-Nichols (ZN) tuning rule is also a popular method used in practice.
The tuning rule is simple and needs only the ultimate information, which can be
estimated easily by simple identification methods, such as the continuous-cycling
method and relay feedback identification method [4]. The ZN tuning rule works
satisfactorily for certain processes. However, because the ZN tuning rule uses only
the ultimate data of the process, its performance is uncertain for those systems with
unusual frequency response characteristics.
For more complicated systems, manual calculation methods are no longer
practical. Software based PID tuning and loop optimization is a must. There are
some software packages that gather the data, develop process models, and suggest
optimal tuning. Some software packages can even develop tuning procedures by
gathering data from reference changes [1, 2].
2.3 Conclusion
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
Chapter 3
Adaptive PI Control for SISO Affine Systems
3.1 Introduction
The problem addressed in this chapter is: would PI (proportional and integral)
control be applicable to uncertain nonlinear systems? Our interest in revisiting PI
control is largely motivated by the fact that, although various advanced control
methods have been developed during the past decades, the preferred one in
engineering practice is still the PID/PI control, due to its simplicity in structure and
intuitiveness in concept. Therefore it has gained wide application in practical
engineering systems [5, 6, 7]. However, the well-known PI control exhibits two
major drawbacks that restrict its application to more general systems. The first one
is that the determination of the PI gains for a given system is an ad hoc and
painstaking process. Thus far there exists no systematic means to guide the
determination of such gains that ensure system stability and performance, although
various methods for tuning PI gains have been suggested in the literature [2, 3, 5, 8].
The second one is that although PI control has been demonstrated quite effective in
dealing with certain linear time-invariant systems, its applicability to nonlinear
systems remains unclear and lacks theoretical insurance for closed-loop system
stability and performance. While some efforts have been made in developing
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
ẋk = xk+1 , k = 1, 2, · · · , n − 1
ẋn = g(X,t)ua + f (X,t) (3.1)
where 0 ≤ ρ (·) ≤ 1, known as the “healthy indicator” [12], indicates the actuation
effectiveness, ur (·) is the uncontrollable portion of the control signal, tρ and tr
denote, respectively, the time instant at which the loss of actuation effectiveness
fault and the additive actuation fault occur. In this chapter, we consider the case that
0 < ρ (·) ≤ 1, i.e., although losing its effectiveness, the actuation is still functional
such that ua can be influenced by the control input u all the time. In addition, tρ and
tr are assumed completely unknown; this fact, together with the unknown and time
varying ρ and ur , literally implies that the occurrence instant and the magnitude of
the actuation faults are unpredictable. The dynamic model considering actuation
failures then becomes
ẋk = xk+1 , k = 1, 2, · · · , n − 1
ẋn = g(X,t)ρ (tρ ,t)u + f (X,t) + g(X,t)ur(tr ,t) (3.3)
The objective is to design a PI-like tracking controller for the system with
lumped uncertainties and disturbances as well as actuator faults as described by
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
(3.3) such that not only stable tracking is achieved, but also pre-described
performance is ensured, yet all the internal signals are continuous and bounded.
More specifically, the PI-like control ensures that: 1) the tracking error
E = X − X ∗ = [ε1 , ε2 , · · · , εn ]T (ε = ε1 ) converges to a small residual set containing
the origin for any given desired trajectory X ∗ = [x∗ , ẋ∗ , · · · , x∗(n−1) ]T ; 2) the tracking
error is confined within a pre-given bound all the time, i.e., there exist performance
functions µ1k (t) and µ2k (t) such that µ1k (t) ≤ εk (t) ≤ µ2k (t) (k = 1, · · · , n) for all
t ≥ 0. In addition, the convergence rate is controlled by e−a0t for some pre-specified
constant a0 > 0; and 3) all the internal signals in the system are ensured to be
continuous and bounded.
To proceed, the following assumptions are in order.
Assumption 3.1 The control gain g(·) is unknown and time-varying but bounded
away from zero, i.e., there exist some unknown constants g and ḡ such that 0 < g ≤
|g(·)| ≤ ḡ < ∞, and g(·) is sign-definite (in this note sgn(g) = +1 is assumed without
loss of generality).
Assumption 3.2 The desired state x∗ and its derivative up to (n − 1)th are assumed
to be smooth and bounded. In addition, x∗(n) , the nth derivative of x∗ , is bounded by
an unknown constant xm , i.e., |x∗(n) | ≤ xm < ∞, ∀t ≥ t0 .
Assumption 3.3 For uncertain nonlinearities f (·), there exist an unknown constant
c f ≥ 0 and a known scalar function ϕ (X,t) ≥ 0 such that | f (·)| ≤ c f ϕ (·). If X is
bounded, so is ϕ (X,t).
Assumption 3.4 ρ (·) and ur (·) are unknown, possibly fast time-varying and
unpredictable, but bounded in that there exist some unknown constants ρm and r̄
such that 0 < ρm ≤ ρ (·) ≤ 1 and |ur (·)| ≤ r̄ < ∞.
Remark 3.1 Assumptions 3.1—3.2 are commonly imposed in most existing works
in addressing the tracking control problem of system (3.1) [10, 14, 15, 16, 17].
Assumption 3.3 is related to the extraction of the core information from the
nonlinearities of the system, which can be readily done for any practical system
with only crude model information. As for Assumption 3.4, it is noted that most
FDD/FDI based fault tolerant control implicitly assumes that the faults vary with
time slowly enough to allow for timely fault identification and diagnosis [18, 19] or
that one has enough information on the faults to carry out parametric
decomposition [16], while Assumption 3.4 imposes no such restriction, and thus
seems more practical.
Remark 3.2 Note that in practice it would be very difficult, if not impossible, to
obtain the exact values of those bounds involved in Assumptions 3.1—3.4. The
developed PI-like control in this chapter, however, is independent of those bound
parameters, thus there is no need for analytical estimation of such bounds despite
the fact that those bounds do exist in stability analysis.
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
To help understand the fundamental idea and the technical development of the
proposed method, we start with controller design for the first-order nonlinear
systems, followed by the extension to the high-order case.
In this subsection we develop the generalized PI control law for first-order nonlinear
systems with actuation failures as described by (3.2). In this case (3.3) with (3.2)
becomes
ẋ(t) = g(x,t)ρ (·)u(t) + g(x,t)ur (·) + f (x(t),t) (3.4)
where x ∈ R denotes the system state. To facilitate the PI controller design, we first
introduce a filtered variable s as,
Z t
s = ε +β ε dτ (3.5)
0
where ε = x − x∗ is the tracking error, and β > 0 is a free parameter chosen by the
designer.
To establish the main results, the following lemma is needed.
Lemma 3.1 R Consider the filtered variable s defined in (3.5). If limt→∞ s = 0, then
ε (t) and 0t ε d τ converge asymptotically to zero as t → ∞Rwith the same decreasing
rate as that of s. In addition, if s is bounded, so are ε and 0t ε d τ .
Proof. The proof can be readily done by using the L’Hopital’s rule, so is omitted
here.
Different from the traditional PI control that involves constant gains, the PI gains
here consist of two parts: 1) constant gains k p1 > 0 and kI1 = β k p1 > 0, with k p1 and
β being chosen freely by the designer and 2) time-varying gains ∆ k p1 (t) and ∆ kI1 (t)
determined automatically and adaptively by the following algorithm,
ĉψ 2
∆ k p1 = , ∆ kI1 = β ∆ k p1 (3.7)
ψ |s| + ι
with
σ1 ψ 2 s2
ĉ˙ = −σ1 γ1 ĉ + (3.8)
ψ |s| + ι
✐ ✐
✐ ✐
Exploring the Variety of Random
Documents with Different Content
established the first hospital and herself cared for human wrecks, set
a precedent existent through all succeeding centuries. All honor to
Queen Isabella, the first to appoint military surgeons and to originate
what was known as the “Queen’s Hospital” for the sick and wounded.
As a nurse in her home, in the plagues of her country and the wars of
the fourteenth century, Catherine Benincasa rose to the exalted
position of Saint Catherine, patron saint of Italy. As a nurse among
the poor, sewing, cooking, keeping the house clean indoors, and
working with her brothers in the harvest field—before she saw the
vision of St. Michael—prepared Joan of Arc to become the deliverer
of France from Britain in the fifteenth century, and in consequence
the Maid of Orleans became a patron saint of that period.
Maria Theresa provided hospitals for the wounded soldiery in the
country over which she ruled, until then a soldiery wholly neglected
in their sufferings on the battlefield. Ever green in memory should be
kept the name of Grace Darling, and that graphic picture of her as
she hastens down from the lighthouse on Farne Island, and through
the mists of that terrible night in 1838 goes to the rescue of the
shipwrecked sailors. Born in Florence, Italy, reared in England, a
little girl caring for the injured birds and animals in her improvised
hospital at Lea Hurst, the student nurse in Germany, the
superintendent of nurses in the Crimean War, Florence Nightingale
became adored throughout Christendom, diffusing rays of glory on
the closing years of the nineteenth century.
Of England’s heroine, Longfellow sings:
A Lady with a Lamp shall stand
In the great history of the land;
A noble type of good,
Heroic Womanhood.
CHARLES E. TOWNSEND
NELSON A. MILES
JOHN J. PERSHING
All streams reach the ocean and calumny in the limpid streams of
truth is lost in the grand ocean of human thought. Whenever “back
wounding calumny” the nation’s heroine strikes, paraphrasing the
words of President Garfield to Secretary of State Blaine and relating
to Clara Barton, “Will the American people please hear the truth
from the truly great and good of America on the subject herein
referred to?” General Nelson A. Miles says: “Clara Barton is the
greatest humanitarian the world has ever known.” “Clara Barton
rendered her country and her kind great and noble service,” says
Speaker Champ Clark. “The greatest of American women, the whole
world knew and loved her,” says Congressman Joseph Taggart. Says
Carrie Chapman Catt: “Clara Barton has won the hearts of the
women of the world.” Speaking of her, no less a scholar and
statesman than Senator George F. Hoar said: “Clara Barton is the
most illustrious citizen of Massachusetts, the greatest man in
America.”
General W. R. Shafter says: “She was absolutely fearless. Miss
Barton is a wonder; the greatest, grandest woman I have ever
known.” Mrs. General John A. Logan, says of her: “One of the
noblest, if not the noblest, woman of her time—the greatest woman
of the nineteenth century.” Says Senator Charles E. Townsend: “The
modest, unselfish and yet undaunted Clara Barton did as much for
the highest good of the world as any single individual since the birth
of civilization.” Says General Joe Wheeler: “The good work done by
Clara Barton will live forever and her memory will be cherished
wherever the Red Cross is known.” Mrs. General George E. Pickett
says of her: “A veteran of the ’60’s, with all the years since filled with
noble deeds, she is a marvel to the world; with all of our executive
women, social figures and ambitious Zenobias, we shall never
produce her like.”
Living at the same time, and serving in the same great struggle for
humanity, the two names alike adored and which for all time will be
associated in American history are ABRAHAM LINCOLN and
CLARA BARTON. Lincoln was born in obscurity, reared on the farm;
so was Clara Barton. Lincoln was inured to poverty, self-educated in
mature years; similarly, Clara Barton. Lincoln stands alone,—no
type, no famed ancestors, no successors; true of Clara Barton.
Lincoln, in the opinion of Robert G. Ingersoll, had the brain of a
philosopher and the heart of a mother; likewise Clara Barton.
Lincoln was gracious to social aristocracy, but did not court it; far
from it, Clara Barton.
As was true of Lincoln, Vice-President Henry Wilson said of Clara
Barton: “She has the brain of a statesman, the heart of a woman.”
Lincoln was a many-sided man; Clara Barton a many-sided woman.
Lincoln had intellect without arrogance, genius without pride and
religion without cant; so had Clara Barton. Lincoln stood the test of
power, the supremest test of mortal; so did Clara Barton. Lincoln
worked seventeen years, paying in instalments a debt incurred in a
mercantile adventure; Clara Barton, while serving humanity,
disbursed hundreds of thousands of dollars without the
appropriation of a penny to her personal use.
Oblivious of titles, epaulettes, clothes, rank and race, Lincoln saw
only the weak mortal; not less so Clara Barton. Lincoln was an
orator,—clear, sincere, natural, convincing. In her hundreds of
lecture engagements, made through the same literary bureau,
speaking from the same platform, Clara Barton was classed with
Charles Sumner, Wendell Phillips, John B. Gough, and Henry Ward
Beecher, the greatest orators of half a century ago.
Lincoln broke the shackles of the blacks in bondage; Clara Barton
broke the shackles of education in America, as Pestalozzi in Europe,
and transformed “pauper schools” into public schools. She broke the
shackles of her sex, and her name was placed on the payroll as the
first woman in the government’s service at the nation’s capital. She
broke the shackles of war-ethics, and was the first woman “angel” on
the battlefield.
She broke the shackles as to national lines, and was the first
woman to traverse the ocean to minister to the war stricken of
another continent. She broke the shackles as to national disasters,
and was the first human being to organize a system to relieve human
distress in times of peace, this now the system of every Red Cross
organization in the world. She broke the shackles of women in
educational life, in military life, in social life, in humanitarian life.
Through the centuries Clara Barton, as Abraham Lincoln, will stand
as the sentinel on the parapet between the warring forces of
humanity and inhumanity.
Lincoln advocated the admitting of “all whites to the right of
suffrage who pay taxes or bear arms, by no means excluding
females.” Clara Barton advocated “the admission of women of
whatever race to all the rights and privileges—social, religious and
political—which as an intelligent being belongs to her.” Lincoln
directed the greatest political organization of his time; Clara Barton,
the greatest humanitarian organization. Lincoln bore malice toward
none,—charity for all; equally so Clara Barton. Lincoln is the
strongest tie that binds together all classes of Americans; Clara
Barton is the strongest, tenderest tie that binds together
humanitarians. Lincoln was the grandest man in the Civil War, is
now receiving the highest homage; Clara Barton, the grandest
woman, and now the most beloved.
Lincoln was denounced a failure, inefficient as an executive and
disloyal to the Union. Clara Barton was accused of “inharmony,
unbusinesslike methods and too many years.” Lincoln passed
without warning and could make no defense; in her own words Clara
Barton says: “When it becomes necessary for me to defend myself
before the American people, let me fall.”
Fleeing the scene of his crime, and referring to Lincoln, there
emitted from the lying tongue of the assassin: “Sic semper tyrannis”;
in answer from the regions of the dead to the woman with the
serpent’s tongue, Clara Barton replies: “Truth is eternal; evil
conspiring and their kindred are doomed to die at last—my own shall
come to me.” If Lincoln dead may yet do more for America and
Americans than Lincoln living, so Clara Barton dead may yet do
more for America and world humanity than Clara Barton living.
Abraham Lincoln and Clara Barton, humanity’s martyrs, the two
immortals.
A score of “the Immortals” lost to memory in any nation and that
nation might well exclaim: “I have lost my reputation, I have lost the
immortal part of myself.” Efface from memory the twenty, or fewer,
immortals of Carthage, of Greece, of Rome, of Italy, of France, of
Germany, of England, of America, then in the centuries hence over
the tomb of every such nation only could be written “Nation
Unknown.” In all the world destroy a score of “the Immortals”
respectively in religion, in literature, in science, in art, in the heroic,
—a hundred names and their influence,—and wealth greater to the
human race shall have been destroyed than if were destroyed every
public structure possessed by one billion six hundred millions of
people now living.
Whether real or imaginary, the heroes of Homer and Virgil are
worth more to the literature of that ancient period than all the
physical wealth of Greece and Rome. What legacy to a nation could
be greater than to have inherited the name and influence of a Homer,
a Socrates, a Michael Angelo, a Queen Victoria, a Washington, a
Franklin, a Lincoln, a Florence Nightingale, a Clara Barton? In the
long centuries ago, of fame it was decreed: “Fame (’tis all the dead
can have) shall live.” Through the centuries, Church and State have
fought for their respective heroes and heroines not unlike Peter the
Hermit and his followers, in the cause of Him on whom depended
their future happiness. Now, as in all the past, the chiefest of a
nation’s enduring wealth are the immortal names that were not born
to die.
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
and there a shrine for the human race till the end of time.
CLARA BARTON
Clara Barton
from
1881 to 1904
Association of America
from
In Memoriam.
ABRAHAM
LINCOLN
Born at Hodgensville, Kentucky
Died at Washington, D. C.
from
1861 to 1865
THE RED CROSS MONUMENT
Her monument is the sign of the Red Cross. Sioux Falls (S. D.)
Press.
The whole civilized world owes Clara Barton more than it can ever
pay in the form of tributes or material monuments.
Worcester (Mass.) Telegram.
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebooknice.com