Acct401-Conceptual and Regulatory Framework for Financial Reporting
Acct401-Conceptual and Regulatory Framework for Financial Reporting
FRAMEWORK FOR
FINANCIAL REPORTING
By
Dr. M. M. Bagudo
INTRODUCTION AND MEANING
• The Conceptual Framework is a system of concepts and
principles that underpin the preparation of financial
statements. These concepts and the principles should
be consistent with one another.
• The IASC issued a conceptual framework for the
preparation and presentation of the financial
statements in 1989 and was adopted by IASB.
• Then in 2010, IASB published the new document, The
Conceptual Framework for the Financial Reporting,
however it was a bit unfinished as a few concepts and
chapters were missing.
• The newest and completed Framework was published in
March 2018 comprising of 8 chapters
Is the Framework equivalent to the
Standard?
• Framework is NOT a Standard itself.
• Recognition
Simply speaking, recognition means including an
element of financial statements in the financial
statements.
In other words, if you decide on recognition, you
decide on WHETHER to show this item in the financial
statements.
Recognition process links the elements in the financial
statements according to the following formula:
Chapter 5: Recognition and
derecognition
• The Framework requires recognizing the
elements only when the recognition provides
useful information – relevant with faithful
representation.
• Then, the Framework discusses the relevance,
faithful representation, cost constraints and
other aspects in a detail.
Chapter 5: Recognition and
derecognition
Derecognition
Derecognition means removal of an asset or
liability from the statement of financial
position and normally it happens when the
item no longer meets the definition of an
asset or a liability.
Again, the Framework discusses the
derecognition in a greater detail.
Chapter 6: Measurement
• Measurement means IN WHAT AMOUNT to
recognize asset, liability, piece of equity,
income or expense in your financial
statements.
• Thus, you need to select the measurement
basis, or the method of quantifying monetary
amount for elements in the financial
statements.
Chapter 6: Measurement
The Framework discusses two basic measurement basis:
1. Historical cost – this measurement is based on the
transaction price at the time of recognition of the
element;
2. Current value – it measures the element updated to
reflect the conditions at the measurement date. Here,
several methods are included:
1. Fair value;
2. Value in use;
3. Current cost.
Each of these measurement base is discussed in a greater
detail.
Chapter 6: Measurement
• The Framework then gives guidance on how to select the
appropriate measurement basis and what factors to
consider (especially relevance and faithful representation).
• The issue here is that the equity is defined as “residual
after deducting liabilities from assets” and therefore total
carrying amount of equity is not measured directly.
• Instead, it is measured exactly by the formula:
Total carrying amount of all assets, less
Total carrying amount of all liabilities.
• The Framework points out that it can be appropriate to
measure some components of equity directly (e.g. share
capital), but it is not possible to measure total equity
directly.
Chapter 7: Presentation and
disclosure
• The main aim of presentation and disclosures is to
provide an effective communication tool in the
financial statements.
• Effective communication of information in the financial
statements requires:
Focus on objectives and principles of presentation and
disclosure, not on the rules;
Group similar items and separate dissimilar items;
Aggregate information, but do not provide unnecessary
detail or the opposite – excessive aggregation to
obscure the information.
Chapter 7: Presentation and
disclosure
• The Framework discusses classification of
assets, liabilities, equity, income and expenses
in a greater detail with describing offsetting,
aggregation, distinguishing between profit or
loss and other comprehensive income and
other related areas.
Chapter 8: Concepts of capital
and capital maintenance
The Framework explains two concepts of capital:
1.Financial capital – this is synonymous with
the net assets or equity of the entity. Under
the financial maintenance concept, the profit
is earned only when the amount of net assets
at the end of the period is greater than the
amount of net assets in the beginning, after
excluding contributions from and distributions
to equity holders.
• The financial capital maintenance can be
Chapter 8: Concepts of capital
and capital maintenance
2. Physical capital – this is the productive
capacity of the entity based on, for example,
units of output per day.
Here the profit is earned if physical productive
capacity increases during the period, after
excluding the movements with equity holders.
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
INTRODUCTION
• Accounting information is regulated to ensure
that users of financial information receive a
minimum amount of information that will
enable them to take meaningful decisions
regarding their interest in a reporting entity.
THE NEED FOR A REGULATORY
FRAMEWORK
• A regulatory framework for accounting is needed
for the following principal reasons:
– Ensure uniformity in the preparation and presentation
of financial report in order to narrow the areas of
difference and choice in financial reporting and to
improve comparability.
– To designate a system of enforcement of that GAAP to
ensure consistency between companies in practice.
– To act as a central source of reference of generally
accepted accounting practice (GAAP) in a given
market
PRINCIPLES-BASED VERSUS RULES-
BASED APPROACH
• A principle-based system works within a set of laid
down principles. A rules-based system regulates for
issues as they arise.
• IFRS’s are written using a 'principles-based' approach.
This means that they are written based on the
definitions of the elements of the financial statements,
recognition and measurement principles, as set out in
the Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of
Financial Statements. In IFRS’s, the underlying
accounting treatments are these 'principles', which are
designed to cover a wider variety of scenarios without
the need for very detailed scenario by scenario
guidance as far as possible.
• In absence of a reporting framework, a more
rules-based approach has to be adopted. This
leads to a large mass of regulation designed to
cover every eventuality. for example US GAAP,
are 'rules-based', which means that
accounting standards contain rules which
apply to specific scenarios.
PRINCIPLES VS RULE BASED STANDARDS
STANDARD ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
PRINCIPLES- Flexible-Allows use Correct approach
BASED(IFRS) of Judgment to deal may npt always be
with variety of obvious since
situation different judgment
might arise
Difficult to use Can give illusion of
creative accounting being insufficiently
rigorous
RULE-BASED (US Brings certainty to Allows for
GAAP) accounting process manipulation
(creative
accounting)
Consistency in Rules cannot
dealing with similar anticipate all likely
situations since no accounting
judgment is allowed problems
PRINCIPLES VS RULE BASED
STANDARDS
• There are areas of convergence and
differences between the two standards.
• The areas of convergence include business
combination, consolidation, share-based
payments, revenue recognition and some
areas of financial instruments.
• Areas of differences include accounting for
lease and insurance contract
CONVERGENCE WITH IFRS
• International Accounting Standard Committee
(IASC)- 1973 to harmonize accounting
standards.
• First International Accounting Standard (IAS)
was issued in 1975.
• IASC is supported by Standard Interpretation
Committee (SIC)
• SIC issued Standard Interpretation Committee
(SICs) Pronouncements
• In 2001, the constitution of IASC was change
and IASC and SIC were replaced by new bodies
called International Accounting Standard
Board (IASB) and International Financial
Reporting Standard Committee (IFRSIC).
• The IASB now issue International Financial
Reporting Standard (IFRS) while the IFRSIC
issue International Financial Reporting
Interpretations(IFRIC)
CONVERGENCE WITH IFRS
• International Accounting Standard Committee
(IASC)- 1973 to harmonize accounting
standards.
• First International Accounting Standard (IAS)
was issued in 1975.
• IASC is supported by Standard Interpretation
Committee (SIC)
• SIC issued Standard Interpretation Committee
(SICs) Pronouncements
CONVERGENCE WITH IFRS
• International Accounting Standard Committee
(IASC)- 1973 to harmonize accounting
standards.
• First International Accounting Standard (IAS)
was issued in 1975.
• IASC is supported by Standard Interpretation
Committee (SIC)
• SIC issued Standard Interpretation Committee
(SICs) Pronouncements
CONVERGENCE WITH IFRS
• International Accounting Standard Committee
(IASC)- 1973 to harmonize accounting
standards.
• First International Accounting Standard (IAS)
was issued in 1975.
• IASC is supported by Standard Interpretation
Committee (SIC)
• SIC issued Standard Interpretation Committee
(SICs) Pronouncements
• The change from IASC to IASB was a vital step
towards he acceptance o IFRS.
• All standards issued by IASC are called IAS
while standard issued by IASB are called IFRS.
• The interpretations issued by SIC are called SIC
pronouncements while interpretation issued
by IFRSIC are called IFRIC
CONVERGENCE WITH IFRS
• International Accounting Standard Committee
(IASC)- 1973 to harmonize accounting
standards.
• First International Accounting Standard (IAS)
was issued in 1975.
• IASC is supported by Standard Interpretation
Committee (SIC)
• SIC issued Standard Interpretation Committee
(SICs) Pronouncements
• At the time of Establishing IASB, all standards
issued by IASC and the interpretations issued
by SIC were adopted.
• However, all new standards and
interpretations to be issued are to be called
IFRS and IFRIC respectively.
• The term IFRS now refer to the whole body of
the rules (IFRS and IAS) that are still in
existence.
• Many IASs and SICs have been replaced or
CONVERGENCE WITH
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
• Harmonization- Why?
• Advantages and Disadvantages
• International adoption of IFRS
• Adoption of IFRS in Nigeria
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK OF CORPORATE
FINANCIAL REPORTING IN NIGERIA
– Company and Allied Matters Act (CAMA)
– Financial Reporting Council (FRC): IFRS, IAS
– Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN): BOFIA 1991,
prudential guidelines.
– Nigerian Insurance Commission (NAICOM):
Nigerian Insurance Act 2003
– Security and Exchange Commission (SEC): Security
and Investment Act 1999
– NSE regulation
– The Nigerian Pension Act.
– Corporate Governance Codes
THE INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (IASB)
• Objectives of IASB
The 3 formal objectives of the IASB are:
(a) To develop, in the public interest, a single set of high
quality, understandable and enforceable global accounting
standards that require high quality, transparent and
comparable information in the financial statements and other
financial reporting to help participants in the world’s capital
markets and other users make economic decisions;
(b) To promote the use and rigorous application of those
standards; and
(c) To bring about convergence of national accounting
standards and IFRSs to high quality solutions.
THE IASB STRUCTURE
IASC Foundation
Trustees