Canaan Abate Thesis After Defense...
Canaan Abate Thesis After Defense...
MARY’S UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION PROGRAM
BY:
CANAAN ABATE
June, 2022
ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA
THE EFFECT OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
PRACTICES ON ORGINIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE:
THE CASE OF LION INSURANCE COMPANY S.C
BY:
CANAAN ABATE
Advisor
TAYE AMOGNE (PhD)
June, 2022
ADDIS ABABA ETHIOPIA
ST. MARY’S UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION PROGRAM
BY
CANAAN ABATE
i|Page
Table of Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................. i
List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. v
List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ vi
Abbreviations and Acronyms ....................................................................................................... vii
Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ viii
Chapter One .................................................................................................................................... 1
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1. Background of the Study ..................................................................................................... 1
1.2. Statement of the Problem ..................................................................................................... 3
1.3. Objectives of the Study ........................................................................................................ 5
1.3.1. General Objectives ....................................................................................................... 5
1.3.2. Specific Objectives ....................................................................................................... 5
1.4. Research Hypothesis ............................................................................................................ 6
1.5. Significance of the Study ..................................................................................................... 6
1.6. Scope of the Study ............................................................................................................... 6
1.7. Limitation of the Study ........................................................................................................ 7
1.8. Organization of the Study .................................................................................................... 7
Chapter Two.................................................................................................................................... 8
Literature Review............................................................................................................................ 8
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 8
2.1. Theoretical Review .................................................................................................................. 8
2.1.1. Human Resource Management ......................................................................................... 8
2.1.2. Theories on the HRM Practices ...................................................................................... 11
2.1.2.1. Organization Behavior Theory ................................................................................. 11
2.1.2.2. Human Capital Theory ............................................................................................. 12
2.1.2.3. Motivation Theory .................................................................................................... 13
2.1.2.4. AMO Theory (Ability, Motivation and Opportunity) .............................................. 14
2.1.2.5. Contingency Theory ................................................................................................. 15
2.1.3. Human Resource Practices .............................................................................................. 16
2.1.3.1. Training & Development .......................................................................................... 17
ii | P a g e
2.1.3.2. Performance Appraisal ............................................................................................. 18
2.1.3.3. Compensation and Reward ....................................................................................... 20
2.2. Empirical Review................................................................................................................... 20
2.2.1. Human Resource Management Practices: International Context .................................... 21
2.2.2. Human Resource Management Practice in Ethiopian Context ....................................... 23
2.3 Conceptual Framework ........................................................................................................... 24
Chapter Three................................................................................................................................ 26
Research Methodology ................................................................................................................. 26
Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 26
3.1 Research Approach ................................................................................................................. 26
3.2 Research Design...................................................................................................................... 26
3.3. Sampling Design .................................................................................................................... 27
3.3.1. Target Population ............................................................................................................ 27
3.3.2. Sample Size ..................................................................................................................... 28
3.3.3. Sampling Technique ........................................................................................................ 28
3.4. Data Collection Instrument .................................................................................................... 29
3.5. Data Collection Procedure ..................................................................................................... 31
3.6. Instrument Validity and Reliability ....................................................................................... 31
3.6.1 Instrument Validity .......................................................................................................... 31
3.6.2 Instrument Reliability....................................................................................................... 32
3.7. Data Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 33
3.8. Ethical Consideration ............................................................................................................. 33
Chapter Four ................................................................................................................................. 34
Data Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation ............................................................................. 34
Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 34
4.1 Response Rate ......................................................................................................................... 34
4.2 General information of respondents........................................................................................ 34
4.3 Descriptive analysis of study variables ................................................................................... 36
4.3.1. Performance Appraisal practice ...................................................................................... 37
4.3.2. Respondents view on the Training and Development Practice ....................................... 40
4.3.4. Compensation Management Practice .............................................................................. 43
iii | P a g e
4.3.5. Respondents view on Organizational Performance ........................................................ 45
4.4. Inferential Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................... 46
4.4.1 Correlation Results ........................................................................................................... 46
4.5. Assumptions/diagnostic test for multiple linear regressions ................................................. 47
4.5.1. Outlier, leverage and influential points ........................................................................... 48
4.5.2 Multicollinearity ............................................................................................................... 49
4.5.3 Homoscedasticity ............................................................................................................. 50
4.5.4 Linearity ........................................................................................................................... 50
4.5.5 Autocorrelation................................................................................................................. 51
4.5.6. Normality ........................................................................................................................ 52
4.6. Analysis of Regression Results.............................................................................................. 52
4.6.1. The Multiple Coefficient of Determination R²................................................................ 53
4.6.2. ANOVA Interpretation .................................................................................................... 53
4.6.3. Regression Coefficients................................................................................................... 54
4.6.4. Hypothesis Testing .......................................................................................................... 55
4.7. Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 57
Chapter Five .................................................................................................................................. 59
Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................ 59
Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 59
5.1 Summary of Findings .............................................................................................................. 59
5.2 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 60
5.3 Recommendation .................................................................................................................... 61
5.4 Area for Further Research ....................................................................................................... 63
REFERENCE ................................................................................................................................ 64
Appendix I: Questionnaire ............................................................................................................ 68
Appendix II: List of Sample Branch Offices ................................................................................ 73
Appendix III: Regression Result ................................................................................................... 74
iv | P a g e
List of Tables
Table 3.1: Population and sample size
Table 3.2: Reliability Test Result
Table 4.1: Response Rate
Table 4.2 General Information of the respondent
Table 4.3: Descriptive statistics result interpretation guide
Table 4.4: Respondents view on the performance appraisal practice
Table 4.5: Respondents view on the training and development practice
Table 4.6: Respondents view on the compensation management practice
Table 4.7: Respondents view on organizational performance
Table 4.8: Pearson Correlation HRM practices and organizational performance
Table 4.9: Residuals Statisticsa
Table 4.10: Multicollinearity test for the Study Variables
Table 4.11: Breusch-Pagan for Heteroscedasticity
Table 4.12: Durbin-Watson Test for Autocorrelation
Table 4.13: Model Summary for HRM practices and the organizational performance
Table 4.14: ANOVA for HRM practices and the organizational performance
Table 4.15: Coefficients for HRM practices and the organizational performance
Table 4.16: Summary of Hypothesis Testing
v|Page
List of Figures
Figure 2.1 Conceptual Framework
Figure 4.1: a Studentized residual scatter plot dependent variables
Figure 4.2: Normal P-P Plot of residual for dependent variables
vi | P a g e
Abbreviations and Acronyms
EDRE Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia
CM Compensation Management
HR Human Resource
HRM Human Resource Management
HRMP Human Resource Management Practice
HRP Human Resource Planning
ICT Information Communication Technology
IT Information Technology
OP Organizational Performance
PA Performance Appraisal
RBV Resource Based View
RS Recruitment and selection
SHRM Strategic Human Resources Management
SPSS Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
TD Training and Development
US United States
vii | P a g e
Abstract
This study seeks to assess the effect of human resources management practices on organizational
performance of Lion Insurance Share Company. This research studied human resources
management practices in the area of Training & Development, Performance Appraisal, and
Compensation Management. Explanatory survey design was used while a questionnaire was
used to gather primary data. The study sample in terms of the respondents covered randomly
selected 156 employees of Lion Insurance Share Company at main office and branch offices in
Addis Ababa. The data collected was analyzed with the aid of descriptive statistical techniques
such as frequencies, percentages and mean score. More so, correlation and multiple linear
regressions were used to examine the relationship between study variables using Statistical
Package of Social Sciences Version 22. The findings of the study revealed that the combined
effect of various human resource management practices influenced organizational performance
positively. The result of regression also indicates that all predictor variables (performance
appraisal, employee training & development and compensation management) have statistically
significant contribution on organizational performance. The adjusted R² of 0.481 indicates
48.1% of the variance in organizational performance can be predicted by human resource
management practiced by the company. Thus, it can be concluded that improved human resource
management practices are significantly influencing organizational performance. Therefore, the
management of Lion Insurance Share Company should improve its human resource management
practices as a way of improving the company performance.
viii | P a g e
Chapter One
Introduction
1.1. Background of the Study
In any organization, human resource is considered as one of the most important assets which
serves as an engine in the organization for providing a sustainable source of energy and service
delivery (Harzing, 2004). An organization is a collection of employees that their activity has
been planned and coordinated to meet certain common mission and objectives. For an
organization to be on a better position and maintain its progress in regards to the intended
objectives, it should be sufficiently staffed with efficient and motivated staff along with well-
developed management system set in place (Davis, 2005).
Many authors on human resource management stress the importance of human resource to
organizations and the inevitable concern to manage it. In fact, they agree that human resource is
the principal determinant for the success of any organization and that its management should
deserve serious attention (Davis, 2005). Hillman & dawton, (2010) emphatically states the
1|Page
pivotal vitality of human resource for the organization as: without effective employees the
organization produces its goods and services inefficiently and even place its survival at risk.
Clearly, organizations need to be concerned about human resources (Bratton and Gold, 2007).
This means that organizations ought to give due attention to human resources management.
In other words, the importance of human resource to the success of an organization as stated by
Jordan, et al, (2012): people are the key to an organization’s success. Management must take the
lead in obtaining the optimum effectiveness from employees; in the form of efficiency, loyalty,
productivity, creativity, and enthusiasm. These objectives necessitate more innovative and
productive ways to manage people. Thus, it is important to have proper human resource
management strategies and practices in order to provide quality goods and services and to have
motivated staff that performs duties effectively and efficiently (Davis, 2005).
According to Lado and Wilson (1995), in recent years, scholars have dedicated much attention
and energy towards demonstrating a linkage between human resource management and firm
performance. Effective HRM can help an organization achieve a competitive advantage and so
improve its performance. As suggested by Jordan, et al, (2012), the effectiveness of HRM
depends on the quality of HR practices, as well as the success of HRM implementation.
However, even if HR practices were believed to be effective, the HRM system might still not be
effective because employees do not know how to implement HR practices successfully on the
work floor. Therefore, we need to study the challenges that employees face when implementing
HRM processes, as these can influence the effectiveness of the whole HRM system (Bratton and
Gold, 2007).
Every organization is comprised of people acquiring their services, developing their skills,
motivating them to high levels of performance, and ensuring that they continue to maintain their
commitment to the organization are essential to achieving organization objectives. This is true
regardless of the type of organization, government, business, education, health, recreation or
social action. Getting and keeping good people is critical to the success of every organization
(Bratton and Gold, 2007). The insurance industry of Ethiopia has played significant roles in
Ethiopian economy and currently the competition has increased than ever before. They are using
different strategy to win the trust of the market. They are fighting for excellence in their service.
2|Page
To bring quality service, they should have quality human resource applicability in their service.
Customer is the main reason why the business is established and customer preference of
company determine by the quality of service they received. Quality service is determined by
effective and efficient applicability of HRM practices.
Lion Insurance Company S.C. is one of the insurance companies in Ethiopia. It was established
in June, 2007 by over 300 shareholders and undergone important steps to be one of the players in
the insurance industry by providing general insurance products to the market. The Human
resource in this company includes all resources (knowledge, skills, abilities, creativity, etc.) of
employees, starting from ordinary employee to top management staff (both core operation and
supporting) contributing to the attainment of the organizational goals. The key concept of
assessing this organization’s human resource management and their impact on employee
performance will help in building, developing, maintaining and using human resources in order
to attain the intended objectives efficiently and effectively.
While checking the human resource management practices in the company, the researcher has
come to understand that the employment, development and well-being of the people working on
this company needs to be strategically approached in an integrated and coherent manner. To
determine the manner that the company achieves its mission by achieving better organizational
performance through its employees’ well-being, the focus of this study is to examine the effect of
some selected human resource management practices on organizational performance with in the
case of Lion Insurance Company S.C.
3|Page
resource management practices on organizational performance is significantly important for
insurance companies. For these reasons, one insurance company, Lion Insurance, is selected for
this study on assessing the HRM practices and determine its effect on organizational
performance.
Today human resources occupy, more than ever, the center stage of all economic activities. It is
alarming time for all those organizations that wish to be successful to gear up and implement
desired shift in their prevailing human resource management practices and leverage their human
resources along with the other resources (Bratton and Gold, 2007). Also, to become more
flexible and innovative, organizations need to adopt new ways of attracting, retaining and
motivating employees who are keen to learn and can contribute to the growth and development
of the organization (Jordan, et al, 2012). If an organization fails to develop and practice an
appropriate human resource management practice then it will face problems all over the
organization since every part of the organization is primarily running by its human resource
(Dessler, 2007).
As stated by Hartel (2007), these problems of HRM practices faced by many organizations
which are not practicing an appropriate HRM are: experiencing high employee turnover, finding
people not contributing their best, poor time management, having company taken to court
because of discriminatory practices, having dissatisfied employees who always think about their
salaries and perceive them to be unfair and inequitable relative to others in the organizations and
other similar organizations, failure to provide job related training which will eventually
undermine the department's effectiveness, indulging in favoritism and nepotism at the cost of
organizational effectiveness (Dessler, 2007).
Currently, there has been a great challenge on the part of managers in Lion Insurance on
determining how exactly they can attain maximum benefits from their employees whom they
believe would go a long way to improve on the organizational overall performance. According to
the preliminary assessment conducted by the researcher for the purpose of this paper, most of
employees are complain on the company performance appraisal system, training and
development practices and compensation scheme. The employees are complaining on lack of
training and development program and most employees are not receiving enough training
4|Page
directly related to their work. For the sake of this paper random sample (pre-tested) of 40
employees has been asked to fill open end question about the training and 72.5% or 29 of them
approves that they not receiving enough training directly related to their work. Employees are
also complaining on the performance measurement system, in which employees are considered
the performance evaluation system as judgmental, subjective and lack objectivity. More so,
according to same preliminary test most of the employees are not satisfied by the current
compensation scheme of the company. Moreover, there was no earlier study related to HRM
practices and their effect on company performance at Lion Insurance in general.
Such problems with the alignment of HRM practice with the strategic goal of the company in the
long run may affect meeting the core value of the company. In addition, the competitive position
of the company may be taken by competitors due to reluctant to their human capital which is a
source of competitive advantage. Taking the aforementioned problems in to consideration, this
study is designed in assessing the effect of human resource management practices on
organizational performance in the case of Lion Insurance.
5|Page
1.4. Research Hypothesis
In order to address the above research objectives, the following research hypothesis will be
empirically tested in the study.
⇒ H2: Training and development has positive and statistically significant effect on
organizational performance of Lion Insurance.
⇒ H3: Performance appraisal has positive and statistically significant effect on organizational
performance of Lion Insurance.
⇒ H4: Compensation and reward has positive and statistically significant effect on
organizational performance of Lion Insurance.
6|Page
1.7. Limitation of the Study
Even though the study was design to enable the researcher collect accurate and reliable data that
can be used to make some inferences, it is however not free from limitations. First, the study was
only encompassed the view and opinion of employees in head office and branch office in Addis
Ababa. Thus, those employees outside the head office in Addis Ababa were omitted in this study
as finances and distances are the limiting factors that inhibit collecting the data from all the
employees across the country. Thus, the finding of the study may not be inferred to the whole
employees of the company around the country. More so, the study is also conducted based on
cross-sectional approach and thus, data was collected at single time rather than frequent
observation over the same sample. Accordingly, the method cannot examine changes over time
which needs more strong empirical investigation.
7|Page
Chapter Two
Literature Review
Introduction
In this chapter the researcher reviews relevant literature on theoretical, empirical and conceptual
framework issues which are found to be essential to the research inquiry. Thus, the first section
discussed theoretical framework related to the study variables which were considered in order to
lay solid foundation for the research. Then a brief summary of some of the related previous work
on this study were discussed. In the final analysis, the chapter reviewed the literature related to
the key study variables as presented in the conceptual framework.
The HRM concept has been attracting the attention of many executives and researchers because
of its influence on organizational and employees’ performance. Beer et al. (1984) defined HRM
as involving all those management decisions and actions that affect the nature of the relationship
between the organization and the employee. Important to note about this definition is the
inclusion of the phrase "action'. This has made Beer and his colleagues the first to declare that
conducting effective HRM practices is the responsibility of line managers (Armstrong, 2008).
8|Page
Armstrong (2006) defines human resource management (HRM) as a strategic and coherent
approach to the management of the most valuable organizations - the people who work there
individually and collectively contribute to achieving goals. He further suggests that human
resource management involves management decisions and practices that directly affect the
organization.
There are also more definitions of HRM practices which are defined from various perspectives.
HRM practices are defined in many ways. Schuler and Jackson (1987) described HRM's
performance as a program that draws, develops, motivates, and retains employees to ensure the
successful implementation and survival of the organization and its members. In addition, HRM
practices are also thought of as a set of consistent policies and procedures built into ensuring that
human firms contribute to achieving their business objectives. Similarly, Mininva (2005) looked
at the HRM methods a set of practices used by an organization to manage human resources by
facilitating the development of direct skills, generating complex social relationships and
generating organizational knowledge to maintain competitive advantage. Storey (1995) defines
HRM as “a distinctive approach to employment management which seeks to achieve competitive
advantage through the strategic deployment of a highly committed and capable workforce, using
an integrated array of cultural, structural and personnel techniques”; while Byars & Rue (2004)
see HRM as “activities designed to provide for and coordinate the human resources of an
organization.”
In addition, Boxall & Purcell (2000) argue that “HRM includes anything and everything
associated with the management of employment relationships in the firm.” The words anything
and everything in the definition explains the wider range of issues comprising policies such
employment contract and ways in which employees may be involved and participate in areas not
9|Page
directly covered by the employment contract thus ensuring suitable work life. Further, it goes
beyond employment relations or industrial relations, which personnel management would not
have been able to render in organizations. However, the four key dimensions to HRM as
postulated by Guest (1987) include;
● Commitment: It is expected of employees to identify the interests and goals of the
organizations, and be aligned and committed in achieving these goals.
● Flexibility: Employees are expected to adapt willingly to change within the
organizational structure, without any strife or prejudice.
● Quality: High levels performance attainment of organization depends on the quality of
members of staff and management of such organization.
● Integration: ‘It involves the matching of human resources strategies to the needs of the
business strategy (Guest, 1987).
HRM has been argued to be a replacement of the term personnel management in organizations.
In this light, experts like Armstrong (1987) sees HRM as ‘old wine in new bottles’; while Guest
(1987) argued that human resource management is not a replacement but somehow differs from
personnel management. Practically, it suggests that Human Resource (HR) tasks are majorly
concern with the administrative activities such as recruitment, reward systems, promotion, and so
on. However, it does not make HR administrators ‘having a seat at the table’ meaning that HR
administrators is not regarded as a strategic business partner, therefore does not contribute to the
success of the business.
A particular definition of HRM which this study has found very interesting, is the one provided
by Robinson (2009) when he defined HRM as "those decisions and actions which concern the
management of employees at all levels in the business and which are related to the
implementation of strategies directed towards creating and sustaining competitive advantage".
This definition of HRM is interesting because it encompasses the main parts involved in the
relationship between HRM practices and aspects of organizational performance. We can see that
this definition stipulates the availability of HRM practices, performance standards or strategies,
and a way of linking the two issues together in order to have these combinations work.
10 | P a g e
According to Storey (2009), the differences in the interpretation of HRM have created two
different schools of thought: soft and hard variants of HRM. Soft and hard HRM are also often
defined as two main models of HRM. Soft HRM focuses on employee training, development,
commitment and participation. It is used to define HR functions aimed to develop motivation,
quality and commitment of employees; hard HRM, on the other hand, concentrates mostly on
strategy where human resources are used to achieve organizational goals. It is also associated
with cost control and head count strategies, especially in business processes like downsizing,
lowering the wages, shortening comfort breaks, etc. (Storey, 2009).
11 | P a g e
realistically all employees. Organizational behavior study includes research areas dedicated to
improving performance at work, increasing job stability, fostering creativity, and fostering
leadership. A focus on organizational behavior helps to explain why certain different behaviors
impact workers ' efficiency and discretionary effort, as well as how to consider and forecast the
effects of different policies on managing human resources (Pfeffer, 2007, p.126-127).
There are several important aspects from the viewpoint of organizational behavior that Pfeffer in
(2007) illustrated three: First, people are social beings and as such are concerned with their
interactions with one another and affected by what others say and do. Secondly, people are
worried with equality and justice, both the distributive results and the mechanisms by which
those results are decided. Because of this equal role in both systems and results, people will be
gradually known as economists, in reality, spend money to "punish" people who violate fairness
standards. Thirdly, organizations as entities are also embedded in a social context and are
influenced and imitated by the other organizations, partly in order to achieve validity by acting
like or look like others and partly in accordance with social expectations and standards. So,
organizational behavior is an area of study that examines the impact those human beings, groups
and structures have on behavior within organizations in order to apply this knowledge to improve
the effectiveness of an organization.
However, there are some researchers who stand against the human capital theory, such as Fix,
Blair (2018) they suggest that the correlation between income and education is weak. “Simple
correlations between earnings and years of schooling are quite weak. Moreover, in multiple
12 | P a g e
regressions when variables correlated with schooling are added, the regression coefficient of
schooling is very small (Mincer, 1974 stated in Fix, 2018).
Human capital theorists claim that productivity and efficiency of employees increases by
education through raising the level of cognitive stock of economically productive human ability
that is an outcome of innate capability and investment in human beings. According to Babalola
(2003) stated in Olanyan and Okemakinde (2008) the logic behind investing in human capital is
built on three points of view which are first, the new generation must be provided with the
knowledge that previous generations also had. Second, the new generation should be trained in
the ways in which the existing knowledge can be used to develop and invent different products
or social services. Third, the new generation should be encouraged to discover entirely new
approaches in fulfilling the community’s needs through creative approaches.
Not to ignore the idea that motivation is quite important in determining the skill of the employee,
so do other variables like the resources provided to an employee to do their job. Successful work
output may therefore emerge from a variety of motives. It provides an ambiguity in the
discussion as performance and motivation varies from individual to individual and from industry
to industry. This therefore gives rise to more critical analytical thought in the subject area. In this
context, several academic literatures from scholars and practitioners have ensured that this
13 | P a g e
fascinating academic area can be resolved on how motivation can improve performance (Haque,
Haque & Islam, 2014).
Observations indicate that workers who are well motivated are more productive and creative in
achieving business or organizational goals. On the other hand, less motivated workers are less
productive and appear to deviate from the accomplishment of organizational goals. Motivation as
incentive programs is essential for capacity building and capacity translation into higher
performance (William, 2010).
14 | P a g e
different forms, for example an organization can increase motivation through communicating
performance feedback to their employees or through providing them with financial rewards.
The last component is the opportunity-enhancing HRM practices which aim at engaging
employee involvement through providing opportunities. According to Bello-Pintado (2015) cited
in Yahya, Tan, & Tay, 2017, p. 550) opportunities-enhancing HRM practices are referred to as
the practices that delegate decision making authority and responsibility from top level hierarchy
to lower-level hierarchy through information sharing. This practice strengths employee trust in
the organization and it fastens organization growth through collective work (Bos-Nehles, et al.,
2013).
However, contingency factors such as culture, globalization and the size of companies have a
direct influence over the HRM functions. According to Rekers (2013) stated that as different
culture implies different HR practices, when the organization involved in a new environment
which the culture is different form exist culture, the HRM need more information to make
decision, take care of changes and maintain balance between employee’s behavior toward new
environment. Globalization is a contingent upon HR practices because the consequences of the
globalization are introducing firms to new technology, which required more training for
employee and hiring skilled labor and globalization lead to new markets which introduce to new
cultures and managing these different become very important for the HR department. Also,
15 | P a g e
company size is contingent upon HRM, because on the smaller firms, the HR department was
not existing or very small and sometime the responsibility takes by production manager while in
larger firms have a separate HR department which available for more issue and required more
HR expertise for being responsive.
In conclusion, HRM is the ability to use employees effectively and efficiency to achieve the
organization’s goal and HRM theories helps HR to achieve this purpose and increase the
motivation and commitment of workers. In this paper discussed six theories which support HRM
functions. The organizational behavior theory helps HRM to understand of employee’s behavior
and explain why certain different behaviors impact employee’s performance. Motivation theory
is about creating a high amount of passion between employees to obtain the desire goals and
address individual needs. The AMO theory paves the way for line managers to use effective
approaches that result in employee motivation using HR policies and practices. Human capital
theory claims that employee education is a key important point for raising productivity. The
resource-based theory is about HRM must know about the company’s sources and capabilities
that can be used for competitive advantage. The last theory, contingency theory focuses of HRM
functions must fit with the organization or external environment aspects to achieve
organizational goals.
16 | P a g e
2.1.3.1. Training & Development
Training and development constitute an ongoing process in any organization. Snell (2006)
defines training and development as the field concerned with organizational activity aimed at
improving the performance of individuals and groups in organizational settings. It has been
known by several names, including employee development, human resource development, and
learning and development. Down (2007) says training focuses on learning the skills, knowledge,
and attitudes required to initially perform a job or task or to improve upon the performance of a
current job or task, while development activities are not job related, but concentrate on
broadening the employee’s horizons.
According Armstrong (2009), training is the formal and systematic modification of behavior
through learning which occurs as a result of education, development and planned experience.
Training serves as communicating tool how to acquire specific skill to do a particular job while
development deals with general enhancement and growth of individual skill and abilities through
conscious and unconscious learning. On other hand development is an unfolding process which
enables people to progress from a present state of understanding and capability to a future state
in which higher-level skills, knowledge and competencies are required. In Harzing (2004) term,
development is “concerned with ensuring that a person’s ability and potential grows through the
provision of learning experiences or through self-directed (self-managed) learning.” Mores in
explain the distinction between the two term, Simachew (2014) outline that training involves
providing the employees the knowledge and skills needed to a particular current job or task while
development is preparing employees for future work responsibilities, increasing capacities and
help them to perform their current job. It enables the individuals to gain their best human
potential by attaining a total all-rounded development.
Training and development help employees to identify organization goals and mission. It helps
not only managing change but also developing positive culture in the organization, which in turn
may lead to providing higher level of service to stakeholders (Armstrong, 2009). The importance
of training has become more obvious given the growing complexity of the work environment,
the rapid change in organizations and technological advancement which further necessitates the
need for training and development of employees to meet the challenges. Training helps to ensure
that organizational members possess the knowledge and skills they need to perform their jobs
17 | P a g e
effectively, take on new responsibilities, and adapt to changing conditions (Jones, George and
Hill, 2000).
More so, employee training and development initiatives can transform organizations with
providing extra skills to your employees to not only increase safety and productivity but training
leads to higher job satisfaction, which shows up in better corporate performance. The existing
literature provides evidence of the existence of clear training and development effects on
employee performance. (Swanson, 19) According to Wright and Geroi (2001), the skills of
employees change through effective training programs. Training has been shown to generate
training for the organization as well as performance improvement benefits for the employee by
positively influencing employee performance through the development of employee knowledge,
skills, competence, competence, and behavior (Appiah 2010; Harrison 2000). Most managers
train their employees for three main objectives (Belcourt, Wright & Saxe, 2000), which are:
● Employee performance to increase productivity;
● To achieve organizational goals; and
● To invest in employees to succeed in the unpredictable and turbulent business
environment.
Armstrong (2012) definitely stated in his published document that organizations could benefit
from training and development through winning the “heart and minds of” their employees to get
them to identify with the organization, to exert themselves more on its behalf and to remain with
the organization. Edralin (2011) implies effective training and development programs in an
organization contribute in the form of enhancement of employees’ skills which in result enable
them to respond to the rapid changes taking place in the external environment of the
organization. A severe circumstance occurs in an organization when a trained employee leaves
the organization to join another organization.
18 | P a g e
job content, job requirements and personal conduct in the position. According to Rao (1990),
performance measurement is a method of evaluating employee performance in the workplace. It
is also defined as a strategic and integrated approach to delivering sustained success to
organizations by improving the performance of the people who work in them and by developing
the capabilities of teams and individual contributors (Armstrong, 2006).
The performance appraisal process usually includes the following basic steps (Aquinas 2006;
Daoanis 2012; Mamoria and Rao, 2012); perform job analysis, establish performance standards,
communication and employee performance standards, measuring real performance, compare
actual performance with standards and starting a corrective action. Performance evaluation
begins with job analysis, job description and job specification, which helps to establish general
performance. Job analysis is used as a basis for improvement, including: job description; job
description; development of performance appraisal, performance standards are established based
on job description. Employees are expected to perform the functions specified in the job
description. Therefore, job descriptions form a comprehensive process by which employees'
performance is measured. (Aquinas 2006).
The function of the performance rating is to obtain from the expected performance level. Also, it
is important to compare and contrast actual performance with pre-determined performance levels
(Seidu, 2012). When performance appraisals are done well, it provides feedback to employees
about their performance and thus organizations (Ikramullah, Shah, Hassan, & Zaman, 2011). The
19 | P a g e
final step in the performance appraisal process is the beginning of the corrective action (if
necessary). Corrective action can be of two types, some are faster and more effective with
symptoms and some are basic and investigate the causes. Immediate corrective action is often
defined as reducing or extinguishing fires, whereas basic remedies reach the source of the
deviation and seek to correct permanent differences (Mamoria and Rao, 2012).
Reward management is concerned with the formulation and implementation of strategies and
policies in order to reward people fairly, equitably and consistently in accordance with their
value to the organization (Armstrong, 2009). As argued by (Hartel, 2007) it is a process designed
to motivate employees to increase morale, commitment, productivity, and teamwork, rewards
and recognition are often given through both monetary and nonmonetary means. According
Beaumont (1993), reward systems is to enhance the motivation of individual employees, and
hence their current on-the-job performance.
20 | P a g e
2.2.1. Human Resource Management Practices: International Context
Several studies have been carried out on HRM practices of organizations in different countries.
Most of previous studies on HRM show that there are strong and positive relationship between
the HR practices and organizational performances (Seaman, Upton, and Carlson, 2006). They
were taken a sample of 168 family-owned fast growths small and medium enterprises was used
to empirically examine the consequences of human resource practices on their business
performance. The result suggested that training and development, use of performance
management and competitive compensation system were highly related with organizational
performance. More so, the findings of Dolan, Mach, Mercè, and Sierra Olivera (2005) showed
that HRM policies and practices play a major role. The variables connected with HRM policies
and practices significantly add to the profile that explains good or poor economic performance of
the firm. Furthermore, the results show that when some HR policies and practices are absent or
poorly implemented, detrimental consequences for firms’ economic performance result.
Similarly, previous research conducted by Horgan & Mohalu, (2006) some HR practices are
linked with good employee performance and resulting the increase in organizational
performance. However, the HR practices will have influence on organizational performance
when only employees contributing to organizational output. In Indian context, Kumar (2007)
conducted comprehensive research in the changing pattern of human resource management
practices under globalization on selected Multi-National Companies in India. The researcher
conducted the study with the objectives of knowing and highlighting the practices of human
resource management adopted by the organization to deal with the competitive situation. On the
basis of data collected and situation observed the study has found the following human resource
management practices in the study area these include training, orientation, compensation,
working environment, performance appraisal and promotion. The HRM practices adopted are
properly matched according to needs of present time. The researcher suggested human resource
manager should have term approach and be proactive rather than reactive and give due emphasis
for HR activates.
Mansour, (2010) examining the relationship between human resource practices and firm
performance. Using companies in Saudi Arabia, this study tests the proposition of HR practices.
The research revealed a positive relationship between the overall HR practices (by using
21 | P a g e
recruitment, training, participation, performance appraisal, and compensation and benefits as the
variables) and the performance of the firm. More so, Tanver et al., (2011) on the article, journal,
“The impact of Human Resource Management practices on the performance of the employees”
argue that all variables (recruitment and selection, training, performance appraisal) are found to
be significantly related with performance of employees. He found that recruitment and selection
and performance appraisal play a vital role for the performance of the employees as training of
the employees is also important. Similarly, Yed & Yan (2012) has done their own research on
four HRM practices showed that training and development, team work, HR planning, and
performance appraisal have positive and significant influence on business performance.
In Malaysia context, Mohammad et al (2014) examined the effect of HRM practices towards
employee performance in Malaysian Skills Institute (MSI). It investigated the factors
recruitment, selection and compensation that affected employee performance in MSI. This
research study found out the effect of HRM practices on employee performance. The results of
the testing hypotheses indicated that the independent variables significantly correlated with the
dependent variable. The correlation results confirmed a significant association between
independent variables and the dependent variable.
According to Saira Hassan (2016) was conducted to determine the impact of HRM practices on
employee’s performance in the Textile industry of Pakistan. The research findings indicated that
HRM practices Compensation, Career Planning, Performance Appraisal, Training, and
Employee Involvement have a positive impact on employee’s performance. Hence, it is proved
that independent variables contribute positively towards change in the dependent variable or
employees ‘performance. She concluded that the appropriate level and extent of HRM practices
implementation in work place that have direct impact on the achievement employees’
performance by equipped employees with skill, knowledge, motivation, abilities and retention
etc.
In Pakistan context, Ilyas et. al. (2016), evaluated the effects of human resource management
practices namely; compensation, performance evaluation and promotion on employee
performance in private telecom sector organization of Rawalpindi and Islamabad. The study
results indicated a significant and positive association of these three practices with employee
22 | P a g e
performance based on the discussion of employees ‘behavior. Eventually, this research
developed the association of these three HRM practices: compensation practices, performance
evaluation and promotion practices (independent variables) have positive relationship with
employees’ performance (dependent variables).
In Ethiopia context, Desalegn (2017), tried to assess the effect, the relationship and the extent
between human resource management practice and organizational performance by conducting it
using all five dimension of human resource management practices planning, recruitment and
selection, training and development, performance appraisal and reward. The Case Study
conducted in Ethiopia. The findings of the study were that in Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahdo
Church the human resource management practice influence organizational performance
moderately.
The study conducted by Alemayehu (2017) found that employees of Ethiopian revenues custom
and authority have an average performance level since they were not satisfied with the present
design and delivery of the training program. Based on the result the correlation coefficient; there
is a highly significant linear correlation between employee performance and training design and
delivery through improving employee’s skill, knowledge and ability. In same token, according to
Amsalu (2017) stated the organization should provide more training to improve its employees‟
performance since employees’ experience and skills might not fit for the frequent changes of
work procedures and technology.
Alene (2017) discovered that performance appraisal is enhancing employees’ performance when
it is directly linked the performance appraisal results to rewards such as recognition and
appreciation career development, leading to promotion and bonus payments and also to salary
levels. But employees are not encouraged to participate in the performance appraisal discussion
in commercial bank of Ethiopia because employees are not involved in the performance
appraisal discussion as a result it is difficult to improve their performance and also discourages
23 | P a g e
the employee motivation. In turn it has its own impact on their employee motivation and
performance.
Begashaw (2017) study using regression analysis of financial compensation and reward of CBE
offered by the company satisfying employees with the benefit packages. The employees of CBE
love their work, committed to the mission and vision of the organization and contributed for the
growth of the organization so that the employees of CBE’s were a good performer. But
employees dissatisfied with the salary scale of the organization, over time payment and housing
allowance. Generally, performance of employees in commercial Bank of Ethiopia was high.
In addition, Mesfin (2019), from Ethiopia studied the effect of human resource practice on
organizational performance with the objective human resource planning, training and
development performance management, promotional management and compensation
management. the findings shows that there was a positive relationship between human resource
management practice of Commercial Bank of Ethiopia and its organizational performance except
promotional practice has no significant effect. The study result shows that a human resource
management practice had directly affect organizational performance. The study finally
recommended that the bank should revise its human resource management practice for a
competitive and advanced service and performance.
24 | P a g e
Figure 2.1 Conceptual Framework
In this study organizational performance is a dependent variable (effect) whereas human resource
management practices are cause. In this research human resource management (HRM) practices
are measured through training & development, performance appraisal, and compensation &
reward research performance. The performance appraisal is measured by performance appraisal
standards, performance appraisal techniques, and performance appraisal objectives. Training &
development is measures in terms of HRD Polices, directives & resources; need assessment;
HRD Plans, objectives and roles; training method and evaluation. Compensation is measured by
pay/salary, benefit and rewards.
25 | P a g e
Chapter Three
Research Methodology
Introduction
In this chapter, the researcher describes the procedures to ensure a methodical and well-informed
investigation, focusing on sampling procedure, data collection and analysis methods. Data
collection instruments and procedures will be discussed as well as the target population and
sampling procedures. Research methodology is described as method of illuminating scientific
procedures in a way suitable for the purpose. It is the general standard which direct the
description of the methods applied in conducting the research study, how to and what analysis to
be done to the data so collected (Akinyele, 2016). These are realized in address research methods
that will be used for the study, the data collection and how the field work for the study is
conducted.
26 | P a g e
know the cause and effect of human resource management practices on organizational
performance. It was therefore justified in view of the above definitions, descriptions and
strengths that explanatory survey is the most suited and appropriate design for this study.
The study population can be defined as the entire collection of cases or units about which the
researcher wishes to draw conclusions (Castilo, 2009). The study population, which is also
known as accessible population, is the population that is derived from the target population for
the smooth condition of the research in specific term. It is from the study population that
researchers draw the sample. According to Smyth (2004), the geographic characteristics of the
target and study population need to be delineated, as well as, types of units being included.
Accordingly, the study population for this study is targeting at employees of the company that
working Head Office and all eighteen branch offices in Addis Ababa. The study was chosen the
head and branch offices in Addis Ababa mainly for the reason that for the smooth conditioning
of conducting research, i.e., for easy access to data, cost effectiveness and easy manageability of
the study, it is geographically delineated at Addis Ababa. Over all, according to company
Physical and Financial Plan for the Year 2021/22, the company has a total size of 256 employees
in head office and eighteen branch Offices at Addis Ababa which constitutes the target
population of the study will be capture in the sampling frame. The lists of sample branch offices
are attached in Annex II.
27 | P a g e
3.3.2. Sample Size
Lavrakas (2008) explains a sample in survey research as a subset of elements drawn from a
larger population. Obviously, such a sample should be typically identical with the population
thus provide adequate representation. If a sample is not precise and inadequate both in
characteristic and size, it may lead to rejection of false null hypothesis, wrong result and
therefore a waste of resources (Gerstman, 2003). Likewise, a study that collects too much data is
wasteful. Therefore, it is essential to establish adequate sample size before going on data
collection for a study. In recognition of this fact, to determine sample size of the study, the
researcher uses a method developed by Taro Yamane’s formula. Therefore, the following
formula is used to determine the sample size.
That is n= N/1+ N (e)² Where: n is the sample size, N is the population size and e is the error of
sampling. For this study the error of sampling is set at 0.05.
N = 256/1+ 256(0.05) ²
= 256/1.64 = 156 respondents
We can see from the result above that the sample size was 156 from the total study population of
256 to maintain a 95% confident interval.
According to Kothari (2004), if a population, from which a sample is to be drawn, does not
constitute a homogeneous group, stratified random sampling technique is generally applied in
order to obtain a representative sample. Under stratified random sampling the population is first
divided into several sub-populations that are individually more homogeneous than the total
population (the different sub-populations are called ‘strata’) and then we select items randomly
from each stratum to constitute a sample. Since each stratum is more homogeneous than the total
population, we are able to get more precise estimates for each stratum and by estimating more
accurately each of the component parts; we get a better estimate of the whole.
28 | P a g e
In recognition of the above fact, the researcher was used stratified random sampling technique on
which the respondents are structured into two strata (Head Office and Branch Offices). This was
because each group of the respondents is required to have its own representative from the total
sample size. Stratified sampling guarantee specific groups within a population are adequately
represented in the sample. Samples from each stratum will be selected by using the following
equation:
nh = (Nh/N)*n
Where; nh is the sample size for stratum h, Nh is the population size for stratum h, N is total
population size, and n is total sample size. The lists of the participants or respondents will be
taken from sample frame of the company. Therefore, the sample size for each status (department)
is presented in the following table. Simple random sampling technique was used to select
respondent from each stratum.
The study utilized questionnaire as major instrument for collecting primary data. Schwab (2005)
defined questionnaire as measuring instruments that ask individuals to answer a set of questions
or respond to a set of statement. A questionnaire is research instrument that is used in data
collection when dealing with a large sample (Kombo, et a1.2002). A questionnaire is preferred
29 | P a g e
because of its convenience and ease of administration. Kothari (2004) stated that questionnaires
have various advantages, like; it is free from the bias of the interviewer; it is low cost even when
the universe is large and is widely spread geographically; respondents have adequate time to give
well thought out answers; respondents who are not easily approachable can also be reached
conveniently; large samples can be made use of and thus the results can be made more
dependable and reliable. In view of the advantages and the need to gather more information,
questionnaires were administered to employees and to solicit their views concerning the effect of
selected human resource management practices on performance of Lion Insurance.
The study was used closed-ended questions. This was due to the fact that closed-ended questions
are often good for surveys, because one can get higher response rates. Besides, answers to
closed-ended questions can easily be coded and analyzed makes them particularly useful when
trying to prove the statistical significance of a survey’s results.
The classification of the questionnaire was divided into five sections. The first section is about
demographic data of the respondent employees. The second section is contained questions about
performance appraisal, that contains 17 items survey questionnaires is developed based on
Caruth & Humphreys, (2008); which include performance appraisal standards (6 items),
performance appraisal techniques (7 items), and performance appraisal objectives (4 items). The
third section contain questions on training and development program that contains 20 items
which is developed based on Hennenman, et al (1989). The fourth section contain questions
about compensation management that contain 12 items which contain 4 items on pay, 4 items on
benefit and 4 items on rewards which are adopted from Hansen, et al (2004). The fifth section
contains questions on organizational performance which contain 8 items that are adopted from
Onyango, (2014).
In addition, the study was used secondary data. Dawson (2009) states that secondary research
data involves the data collected using information from studies that other researchers have made
of a subject. The secondary data has collected from different published material like report,
manual, books, magazines, journal articles, websites, research findings and any other concerned
bodies will be used to extract any sort of essential information to strengthen the study findings.
30 | P a g e
3.5. Data Collection Procedure
Primary data was collected through the administration of questionnaires to employees of Lion
Insurance. Before the full-scale survey, pilot survey will be undertaken for a sample of
respondents. The objective of the pilot survey is to check whether the desired result using the
questionnaire is obtained or not and to identify and exclude potential problems associated with
content in the questions and wordings. During the full-scale survey, the questionnaire was
administered to the target population through personal contact by the researcher. Respondents
were kindly requested to fill the questionnaire. Organizations and staffs’ permissions to do this
will be sought and approval was received.
In recognition of this fact, therefore, a validity test of the questionnaires was done on its content.
Content validity measures the extent to which a test acts to measure a concept analysis of the
items so as to confirm adequate coverage of the scope of the study by the measuring instrument
(Oyerinde, 2011). In order to ascertain the relevance of each question to variables being
measured and to ensure that the content of the instrument provide answers to the objectives of
the study and the formulated hypotheses, content validity of the pilot questionnaire was tested.
31 | P a g e
The response of the pilot administration of the questionnaire was used to improve the content
values of the questions used in the main administration.
The study was employed Cronbachs’ alpha to assess reliability of the questionnaire. Cronbachs’
co-efficient alpha is the most common way of measuring internal consistency. Cronbachs’
coefficient (alpha) may range between 0 to 1, with 0 indicating an instrument full of errors and 1
indicating total absence of error. The closer Cronbach’s alpha coefficient is to 1, the higher the
internal consistency reliability (Oyerinde, 2011). A reliability coefficient (alpha) of 0.70 is
considered acceptable, reliable and recommended for new questionnaire. The reliability of the
questionnaire was tested using the Cronbach’s alpha correlation coefficient with the aid of
Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software. The descriptive analysis of primary data
showed that a high reliability was attained by questionnaire instrument with acceptable range of
reliability coefficients.
32 | P a g e
As Tavakol (2001) stated that, there are different reports about the acceptable values of alpha,
ranging from 0.70 to 0.95. Hence, the Cronbach‘s alpha coefficient of all the above variables was
fall within the stated range and concluded that there is consistency among each question in the
questionnaire
Next, the collected and processed primary data from the questionnaire was analyzed by
descriptive statistics, and multiple linear regression analysis. Descriptive statistics such as mean
scores, percentages, frequency distribution and standard deviations were computed to describe
the characteristics of the variables of interest in the study. Besides, inferential statistics such as
multiple linear regression analysis was used to test the hypothesized relationships and to
determine the relative importance of each independent variable in explaining the variation
organizational performance of the case company.
33 | P a g e
Chapter Four
Data Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation
Introduction
This chapter deals with organization, analysis and presentation of data collected from
respondents using questionnaires. The data collected was analyzed and interpreted in line with
the objective of the study which was to assess the effect of human resource practice on
organizational performance of Lion Insurance Company S.C. It gives the empirical findings and
results following the application of these variables using the techniques indicated in the third
chapter.
34 | P a g e
that helps the researcher to determine the ability of the respondent to contribute meaningfully to
the investigation. The result is presented in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2 above shows the gender distribution of the respondents who participated in the study.
From table 4.2 show that 72.2% were males while 27.8% were females. The findings showed
that male respondents were more than with female a representation and this finding indicate that
males were dominated in the company.
35 | P a g e
Respondents represented customers from a range of ages. The age distribution was 59
respondents (44.4%) age between 26 - 40 years, 58 respondents (43.6%) were age between 41 -
55 years, 11 respondents (8.3%) were above 55 years and the remaining 5 respondents (3.8%)
were age between 15-25 years and. The different age groups were therefore well represented in
the study.
Regarding the educational qualification, 51.1% respondents were having first Degree, 45.2%
respondents were Second Degree and above, 2.3% of the respondents were having Diploma
while the remaining 1.5% of the respondents were having secondary education. This therefore
means that the respondents who participated in this study are well informed about the human
resource management practices. These respondents were therefore able to give their perceptions
of the human resource management practices by answering the questionnaire.
Concerning the position in current organization, 80.5% were professional workers, 10.5% were
worked in clerical position, while the remaining 9% were working in managerial positions.
Regarding the length of tenure in current organization, 49.7% were stayed for 2 – 5 years, 21.8%
were stayed for 6 – 10 years, 15% were stayed for less than two years and the remaining 13.5%
were stayed for more than ten years in their current organization. This indicates that participants
have been with the current company for a longer period of time and so have a good
understanding of the company's human resource management practices.
The analysis of this study was done using descriptive statistics or through using central tendency,
from these the researcher used the mean scores of each variable. The main reason for using this
measurement was to demonstrate the average responses of respondents for each question that
was included under each dimension of the predictor variable and to reach the grand mean of each
36 | P a g e
dimension. Finally, the interpretation is made by using the grand mean of each independent
dimension for the aim of achieving partial research objectives of the study. A range of mean was
constructed by using itemized Likert rating scale. The researcher was used (Shrestha, 2015)
guide to interpret the result which is presented in the Table 4.3. The mean of each individual
item ranging from 1- 5 falls within the following interval:
37 | P a g e
Performance Appraisal Techniques or method (PAT) 3.09 1.1
6. The rater uses the graphic rating scale method (excellent, good, average, 3.60 .945
and fair, poor) to appraise.
7. The rater compares every employee with every other employee in the 2.66 1.34
workgroup.
8. Supervisors use behaviorally anchored rating method that is, a description 3.56 1.05
of each assessment along a continuum (a numeric scale from low to high)
9. The rater uses the ranking method (best worker, average worker, and 2.76 .970
worst) for appraising employees.
10. The rater uses management by objective method (management setting 2.64 1.05
goals with employees then evaluate performance finally reward according
to the result)
11. Employees participate in setting standards and measuring performance 2.92 1.29
12. The rater gives feedback after the appraisal result. 3.54 1.07
Performance Appraisal Objectives (PAO) 2.77 1.12
13. The company use performance appraisal-based payment, such as bonuses 2.83 1.18
and incentives
14. Human resource management decisions for promotion, termination and 2.79 1.12
layoff is purely based on Performance Appraisal
15. The result on Performance appraisal uses to reward good performer 2.72 1.09
employees in a better way than other fewer performer employees.
16. The appraisal data are used by the HR department for other development 2.77 1.10
decisions like job rotation, job enrichment, etc.
Grand Mean 3.02 1.07
Table 4.4 showed that respondents report on performance appraisal practices. The grand mean
response for performance appraisal practice is 3.02, which according to Shrestha (2015), is
medium. This implies the company performance appraisal practices as whole are somehow on
average level and which in turn indicated that there are areas that need improvement.
The study measures performance appraisal in terms of three sub components, namely:
performance appraisal standard measures, performance appraisal techniques or method and
performance appraisal objectives. Table 4.4 also shows the composite mean value for each the
three performance appraisal sub components. Accordingly, the composite mean value for
performance appraisal standard measures is 3.19, which according to Shrestha (2015), is
38 | P a g e
Medium. This indicates the company performance appraisal practices in context of performance
appraisal standard measures as whole are somehow moderate though there are some areas that
need improvement. Specifically, the result revealed that there is limitation in terms of
organization gives training for performance appraisers to improve the fair appraising evaluation
system as represented by mean value of 2.69. Thus, the company needs to consider this issue and
gives training for performance appraisers to improve the fair appraising evaluation in the future.
On other hands, the composite mean value for performance appraisal techniques or method is
3.09, which according to Shrestha (2015), is Medium. This also indicates the company
performance appraisal practice in context of performance appraisal techniques or method on
average level. These mean that there is limitation in terms of using various kinds of performance
appraisal technics or methods. As finding indicated, the company mainly applies the graphic
rating scale method (excellent, good, average, and fair, poor) to appraise, which has the highest
mean value (3.69) and followed by using behaviorally anchored rating method that is, a
description of each assessment along a continuum (a numeric scale from low to high), which has
mean value (3.55). The mean value for other performance appraisal methods is low. The mean
value for management by objective method is 2.64 and the mean value for the ranking method is
2.76. This implies the company need to consider these methods as well in the future.
Lastly, the composite mean for performance appraisal objectives are 2.77, which is below
average that indicates there are lots of gaps concerning the company performance appraisal
practices in context its objectives that need further improvement and attention. Regarding sub
items of performance appraisal objective, the appraisal data are used by the HR department for
other development decisions like job rotation, job enrichment, etc. got the lowest mean value
(2.72), followed by statements that the result on performance appraisal uses to reward good
performer employees in a better way than other fewer performer employees which has mean
value (2.77). This implies that the company has limitation in terms of using the result of
performance appraisal to various human resource decisions. Thus, the company need to consider
these issues and improved them in its performance appraisal practices in the future.
39 | P a g e
4.3.2. Respondents view on the Training and Development Practice
Training is a planned effort to enable employees to learn job related knowledge, skills, and
behavior. Development involves acquiring knowledge, skills, and behavior that improve
employees’ ability to meet the challenges of a variety of new or existing jobs, including the
client and customer demands of those jobs. In premise to this concept the survey was provided
related questions to assess respondent view on the company training and development practices.
The survey results were presented in Table 4.5.
40 | P a g e
14. The delivery method that the Company employed is proper to acquire the 3.02 .973
necessary knowledge, skills and attitudes.
15. The Company is employed trainee- centered training and development as 3.32 1.11
well as delivery method.
16. The trainers have knowledge, skills and ability to transfer and demonstrate 3.35 1.05
the content of training and development appropriately
Training and Development Evaluation Practice 2.95 0.97
17. The organization evaluates the training and development practice before, 3.11 .915
on the process and after the program
18. The organization use feedback at the end of the training and development 2.95 .968
program
19. Training evaluation is used to identify potential candidate for current 2.99 1.04
training & future development
20. Training evaluation assesses the gap before and after delivery of the 2.78 .987
training
Grand Mean 3.14 0.99
Table 4.5 showed report on respondents’ response on training and development practices. The
grand mean response for training and development practice is 3.14, which according to Shrestha
(2015), is medium. This implies the company training and development practice as whole are
somehow on average level and which in turn indicated that there are areas that need
improvement.
The study measures training and development in terms of five sub components, namely: HRD
Polices, directives & resources; need assessment; HRD Plans, objectives and roles; training
method and evaluation. Table 4.5 also shows the composite mean value for each five training
and development sub components. Accordingly, the composite mean value for HRD practice in
the context of polices, directives & resources is 3.24, which according to Shrestha (2015), is
moderate. This indicates the company HRD practice in the context of polices, directives &
resources are somehow modest though there are some areas that needs improvement.
Specifically, there is limitation in terms giving serious attention to allocate sufficient budget and
resource for the training and development as revealed by the mean value (2.65). Thus, the
company need to consider these issues and required to give serious attention to allocate sufficient
budget and resource for the training and development practices in the future.
41 | P a g e
Table 4.5 above also illustrated the result concerning the HRD needs assessment practice. The
finding indicated that composite mean response for the company training and development need
assessment practice is 3.11, which according to Shrestha (2015), is medium. This indicates the
company practice in terms of training and need assessment are somehow moderate though there
are some areas that needs improvement. Specifically, result from the quantitative investigation
regarding the company training and development need assessment practices indicated that there
are limitations in term of producing SMART need assessment manual & instrument as revealed
which has the lowest mean value (2.83). Thus, the company need to consider this issue and will
required to produce SMART need assessment manual & instrument in the future.
Table 4.5 above also showed that the composite mean value for the company HRD plans,
objectives and roles practice is 3.21 which according to Shrestha (2015), is medium. This implies
that there are some areas that need improvement. Specifically, result from the quantitative
investigation regarding HRD practices in context of setting HRD plans, objectives and roles
indicated that there are limitations in terms of allowing participation of all employees in
preparation the company T&D plan, which has the lowest mean value (2.86). Thus, the company
need to consider this issue and will work to improve the participation of all employees in
preparation the company T&D plan in the future.
The table 4.5 above also indicated that the composite mean response for the company practices
in terms of training & development delivery methods is 3.2 which according to Shrestha (2015),
is medium. This indicate the company practices in terms of training & development delivery
methods is at average level according to respondent response though there are room for
improvement. Regarding sub items of training and development method, the delivery method
that the company employed is proper to acquire the necessary knowledge, skills and attitudes,
got the lowest mean value (3.02), followed by statements that the company gives both on-the-job
and off-the-job training (3.11). Thus, the company need to consider these issues and improved
them in its training and development practices in the future.
Table 4.5 also showed that respondents report on training and development evaluation practices.
The grand mean response for the company practices in terms of training and development
evaluation practice is 2.95, which according to Shrestha (2015), is medium. This indicates
42 | P a g e
relatively less agreement among the respondents concerning training and development evaluation
practice. Regarding sub items of training and development evaluation practice, training
evaluation assesses the gap before and after delivery of the training got the lowest mean value
(2.78), followed by statements that the organization use feedback at the end of the training and
development program which has mean value (2.95). This implies that the company has limitation
in terms of using feedback and evaluation of training program. Thus, the company need to
consider these issues and improved them in its training and development practices in the future.
43 | P a g e
Table 4.6 showed that respondents report on compensation management practices. The grand
mean response for compensation management practice is 2.85, which according to Shrestha
(2015), is medium. This implies the company compensation management practice is below the
average and which in turn indicated that there are areas that need improvement.
The study measures compensation management in terms of three sub components, namely:
pay/salary, benefits and rewards. Table 4.6 also shows the composite mean value for each the
three performance appraisal sub components. Accordingly, the composite mean value for
pay/salary is 2.74, which according to Shrestha (2015), is medium. Regarding sub items of pay
practices, my salary does match with cost of living in the country got the lowest mean value
(2.16), followed by statements that I am satisfied with my current salary which has mean value
(2.65). This implies that the most of respondents were not satisfied by the company pay system.
Thus, the company need to consider these issues in the future and improved its pay system in
order to match with cost of living in the country.
On other hands, the composite mean value for benefits is 2.83, which according to Shrestha
(2015), is medium. This also indicates the company compensation management practice in
context of benefit package on below average. Regarding individual item of benefit practices, I
am satisfied with the benefits I receive got the lowest mean value (2.32), followed by statements
that the benefits we receive are as good as most other organizations offer (2.85). This implies
that the most of respondents were not satisfied by the company benefit package. Thus, the
company need to consider these issues in the future and improved its benefit package in order to
at least match with most other organizations offer.
Lastly, the composite mean value for compensation management practice in context of reward
management is 2.98, which according to Shrestha (2015) is medium that indicates there are
employees are still worried about the company reward practice. Regarding sub items of rewards,
statement that I do feel my efforts are rewarded the way they should be got the lowest mean
value (2.82), followed by statements that there are more rewards for those who work here, which
has mean value (2.85). This implies that the company has limitation in terms of appropriately
reward its employee efforts. Thus, the company need to consider these issues and improved its
reward practices in the future.
44 | P a g e
4.3.5. Respondents view on Organizational Performance
The respondents were also asked to rate their opinion concerning organizational performance of
Lion Insurance Share Company. The summary of their responses to specific questions, as
revealed by the results, will be presented in table 4.7.
45 | P a g e
4.4. Inferential Statistical Analysis
This section describes the inferential statistical analysis that was derived from the collected data
and models. The study sought to test the relationship between human resource management
practices and organizational performance. This was done through correlation and regression
analysis. It starts with results of the correlation and then precedes to results of the multiple linear
regression models.
The findings of the study are presented in Table 4.8. The result shows that there are positive but
relatively strong relationship between the four HRM practices (Training & Development and
Performance Appraisal, and compensation management) and organizational performance. The
results show that compensation management as HRM practices was positively correlated to
organizational performance with a Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient of r = 0.597 and at level of
significance of 0.000, was statistically significant as the p-value is less than 0.01. This
relationship was moderately strong. The results also revealed that there is a moderately strong
and positive relationship between the remaining two HRM practices, performance appraisal, and
training & development and organizational performance with a Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient
of r = 0.593 and 0.526 respectively.
46 | P a g e
Table 4.8: Pearson correlation HRM practices and organizational performance
Over all, all the three HRM practices (Training & Development, Performa’s Appraisal, and
compensation management) are moderately strong positive relation with organizational
performance with a Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient of r >0.5 in all case. This indicates that
HRM practices had a positive correlation with the organizational performance and the
relationship is moderately strong.
47 | P a g e
4.5.1. Outlier, leverage and influential points
The first assumption of multiple regressions is that there should be no major outliers, high
leverage points, or very influential points in order to make accurate inferences on multiple linear
regressions. Outliers leverage, and influential points, according to Rousseeuw et al. (1990) are
observations in a data set that are uncommon in some way and can influence the output that
statistical software produces, reducing the prediction accuracy of results as well as statistical
significance. As a result, detecting any outliers, high leverage points, and highly influential
points is critical before employing a multiple regression analysis. The residual analysis is used to
do this. Table 4.9 contains summaries of residual statistics.
An outlier, according to Wilcox (2001), is a data point whose response y does not follow the
overall trend of the data. The standardized residual (also known as the studentized residual) is a
value that quantifies the size of the residuals in standard deviation units, making it easy to spot
outliers. In principle, an observation with a Standardized residual (studentized residual) value
greater than 3 in absolute value is referred to as a "outlier" (Rousseeuw, et. al, 1990). The
dependent variable organizational performance has standardized residual values ranging from
2.21 to 2.393 in all cases, indicating that there are no outliers in the dataset.
A data point has high leverage if it has "extreme predictor x values," according to Wilcox (2001).
The incredible part about leverages is that they can assist in identifying extreme x values that
48 | P a g e
may have an impact on regression analysis (Rousseeuw, et. al, 1990). According to Wilcox
(2001), any observation whose leverage value, hii, is more than 3 times more than the mean
leverage value (3(k+1)/n) should be flagged. According to this algorithm, any observation with a
leverage value more than 0.09 is deemed a high leverage point in this investigation. Table 4.9
reveals that the leverage value for the dependent variable organizational performance ranges
from 0.001 to 0.088, which is less than the 0.09 cut-off point, which is an indication that the data
is free from high leverage points.
A data point is influential if it "unduly influences any component of a regression analysis, such
as the expected responses, the estimated slope coefficients, or the hypothesis test findings,"
according to Wilcox (2001). Cook's distance is a measure of how much the residual of all records
would vary if a certain record was removed from the model coefficients calculation (Rousseeuw,
et. al, 1990). A popular rule of thumb, according to Wilcox (2001), is that a cook's distance
higher than one should be scrutinized and possibly eliminated. Table 4.9 shows that a cook's
distance for a dependent variable organizational performance range from 0 to 0.136, which is
lower than the cut-off points of 1. This suggests that no data point unduly influences the
estimated regression function.
4.5.2 Multicollinearity
When two or more independent variables are substantially correlated with each other,
multicollinearity arises. This complicates determining which independent variable contributes to
the variation explained in the dependent variable (Simon, 2004). The Variance Inflation Factor
(VIF) is a tool for determining if study variables are multicollinear. Variance Inflation Factor
was checked for indication of multicollinearity where their numerical values were all well below
the cut-off value of 10 suggested by Neter, et al., (1996). There was no collinearity among the
independent variables based on this rule of thumb.
49 | P a g e
4.5.3 Homoscedasticity
In a study, homoscedasticity occurs when the variance of residuals (error term) is the same for all
predicted variables (Tabachnic & Fidell, 2007). Heteroscedasticity in a study, on the other hand,
occurs when the variance of the errors varies between observations (Long & Ervin, 2000). There
are different ways for measuring the availability of heteroscedasticity. The most commonly used
methods is Breusch-Pagan test which was used to test the null hypothesis that the error variances
are all equal versus the alternative that the error variances area multiplicative function of one or
more variables. Breusch-Pagan tests the null hypothesis that heteroscedasticity is not present. If
sig-value is less than 0.05, reject the null hypothesis. A large chi-square value greater than 9.22
is an indication of the existence of heteroscedasticity (Sazali, et al., 2010). In this study, the sig-
value for fitted values of dependent variable organizational performance was 0.1908 and chi-
square value of 1.71, which are indicating that heteroscedasticity was not a concern.
4.5.4 Linearity
The linearity assumption in multiple regression analysis assumes that the dependent variable and
each of the independent variables, as well as the dependent variable and the independent
variables collectively, must have a linear relationship (Asghar & Saleh, 2012). The most frequent
method for evaluating linearity is to create scatter plots and then visually evaluate them for
linearity. It is a sign of linearity if the figure has no evident pattern and the points are evenly
distributed above and below zero on the X-axis, and to the left and right of zero on the Y-axis.
The scatter-plot of studentized residual against linearly predictive value is shown in the figures
below. The figures have a horizontal band of points indicating the linear relationship.
50 | P a g e
Figure 4.1: a Studentized residual scatter plot dependent variables
4.5.5 Autocorrelation
In multiple regressions, the assumption of autocorrelation (serial correlation) is a critical
assumption that the error terms are independent of one another. This is especially true for time
series data, which are organized chronologically. The Durbin-Watson test is one of the most
widely used methods for determining if there is autocorrelation, or a linear connection between
the error terms for one observation. If the value of d is between 1.5 and 2.5, there is no
autocorrelation, according to Cochrane (1997). As may be seen in table 4.11, the outcome
revealed that there is no autocorrelation.
51 | P a g e
4.5.6. Normality
The normality assumption in multiple regressions assumes that residuals (errors) are nearly
regularly distributed. The residuals of the regression should follow a normal distribution in order
to derive accurate inferences from regression analysis. Plotting normal P-P or Q.Q for the
dependent variable to corroborate the given result is a straightforward technique to check this
assumption (Asghar & Saleh, 2012). The cumulative probabilities (values range from 0 to 1) are
plotted on the X-axis, and the predicted probabilities given the normal curve are plotted on the
Y-axis. The points would be on a straight diagonal line if the sample was exactly normally
distributed. The graph below illustrates Normal P-P plots for the dependent variables
(organizational performance), in which the points lie on a straight line, indicating that the data is
normally distributed.
52 | P a g e
performance appraisal, employee training & development and compensation management. Thus,
study sought to determine the effect of each of the human resource management practice
(performance appraisal, employee training & development and compensation management) on
the organizational performance. The result of the regression analysis is presented in the
following section.
Table 4.13: Model Summary for HRM practices and the organizational performance b
Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the Durbin-Watson
Square Estimate
1 .702a .493 .481 3.558 1.708
a. Predictors: (Constant), CM, TD, PA
b. Dependent Variable: OP
Source: (Survey data, 2022)
The result shows that the three independent variables performance appraisal, employee training
& development and compensation management) that were studied explain 48.1% of variation
organizational performance as represented by the R² value. The remaining 51.9% of the
variability in organizational performance is left unexplained by the explanatory variables used in
the study.
53 | P a g e
management, considered were relevant in explaining organizational performance of Lion
Insurance Share Company.
Table 4.14: ANOVA for HRM practices and the organizational performance a
Performance Appraisal as one practice on HRM has also positive and significant effect on
organizational performance with a beta value (beta =.361) and t value of 4.347 which is also
statistically significant. Similarly, training & Development has also positive and significant
effect on organizational performance with a beta value (beta =.335) and t value of 2.789 which is
also statistically significant. Compensation Management has also positive and significant effect
on organizational performance with a beta value (beta =.596) and t value of 3.882 which is also
statistically significant.
54 | P a g e
Table 4.15: Coefficients for HRM practices and the organizational performance
Model Unstandardized Standardized t Sig. 95.0% Confidence
Coefficients Coefficients Interval for B
Beta Std. Error Beta Lower Upper
Bound Bound
(Constant) -45.933 7.710 -5.957 .000 -61.188 -30.678
PA .361 .083 .332 4.347 .000 .197 .526
1
TD .335 .120 .212 2.789 .006 .097 .573
When these beta coefficients are substituted in the equation, the model becomes
According to the Table 4.16, there is a significant relationship between the three dimensions of
HRM practices and organizational performances since their coefficients are significant level.
Furthermore, the hypothesis were devised and tested as shown below:
55 | P a g e
H1: There is statistically significant and positive relationship between performance appraisal and
organizational performance.
Research hypothesis one predicts a statistically significant and positive relationship between
performance appraisal and organizational performance. Similar to the hypothesis, the regression
output showed positive and statistically significant relationship and this would enable the
researcher not to reject the hypothesis H1.
H2: There is statistically significant and positive relationship between training and development
and organizational performance.
Research hypothesis two predicts a statistically significant and positive relationship between
training and development and organizational performance. Similar to the hypothesis, the
regression output witnessed the positive and statistically significant relationship and this would
enable the researcher not to reject the hypothesis H2.
H3: There is statistically significant and positive relationship between compensation management
and organizational performance.
Research hypothesis three predicts a statistically significant and positive relationship between
compensation management and organizational performance. Similar to the hypothesis, the
regression output noted that positive and statistically significant relationship and this would
enable the researcher not to reject the hypothesis H3.
The study found that performance appraisal as one practice on HRM has also positive and
significant effect on organizational performance with a beta value (beta =.361) and t value of
4.347 which is also statistically significant. This finding has also previous empirical support.
More so, Tanver et al. (2011), found that performance appraisal is found to be significantly
related with organizational performance. Similarly, Yed & Yan (2012) has done their own
research on four HRM practices showed that training and development, team work, HR planning,
and performance appraisal have positive and significant influence on business performance. In
Ethiopian context, Alene (2017) discovered that performance appraisal is enhancing employees’
performance when it is directly linked the performance appraisal results to rewards such as
recognition and appreciation career development, leading to promotion and bonus payments and
57 | P a g e
also to salary levels. But employees are not encouraged to participate in the performance
appraisal discussion in commercial bank of Ethiopia because employees are not involved in the
performance appraisal discussion as a result it is difficult to improve their performance and also
discourages the employee motivation.
Similarly, the study found that training & Development has also positive and significant effect
on organizational performance with a beta value (beta =.335) and t value of 2.789 which is also
statistically significant. This finding is also consistent with most of the previous studies.
Alemayehu (2017) found that there is a highly significant linear correlation between
organizational performance and training design and delivery through improving employee’s
skill, knowledge and ability. In same token, according to Amsalu (2017) stated the organization
should provide more training to improve its organizational performance since employees’
experience and skills might not fit for the frequent changes of work procedures and technology.
Finally, the study found that compensation management has also positive and significant effect
on organizational performance with a beta value (beta =.596) and t value of 3.882 which is also
statistically significant. This finding is also in line with the findings of the majority of previous
studies. In Pakistan context, Ilyas et. al. (2016), found that compensation management had
significant effect on performance of private telecom sector organization of Rawalpindi and
Islamabad. In Ethiopia context, Begashaw (2017) study using regression analysis of financial
compensation and reward of CBE offered by the company satisfying employees with the benefit
packages. He found that employees of CBE love their work, committed to the mission and vision
of the organization and contributed for the growth of the organization so that the employees of
CBE’s were a good performer.
In summary, this research provides important information to the management of the Lion
Insurance Company to find ways to increase organizational performance level. Compensation
management, performance appraisal and training and development are the areas that should be
given extra attention if the management would like to produce staffs with greater organizational
performance.
58 | P a g e
Chapter Five
Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations
Introduction
The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of the human resource management practice
on performance of Lion Insurance Company S.C. with reference to performance appraisal,
employee training & development and compensation management. In this chapter, the summary
of findings, conclusions and recommendations of the study were discussed.
The findings of the study revealed that the combined effect of various human resource
management practices influenced organizational performance positively. These findings were
both supported by the correlation and regression result. The correlation result shows that there is
positive and significant relationship between all human resource management practices
(performance appraisal, employee training & development and compensation management) and
organizational performance. The finding also indicates that the highest relationship was found
between compensation management and organizational performance.
The result of regression also indicates that all predictor variables or human resource management
practices (performance appraisal, employee training & development and compensation
59 | P a g e
management) have statistically significant contribution on combined influence the organizational
performance. The adjusted R² of 0.481 indicates 48.1% of the variance in organizational
performance can be predicted by human resource management practiced by the company.
Therefore, human resource management practices have a positive and significant effect on
organizational performance.
5.2 Conclusions
The study was undertaken to examine the effect of the human resource management practice on
organizational performance of Lion Insurance Share Company. Accordingly, based on the
findings presented in the above section; the researcher makes some conclusions concerning the
relationship between the human resource management practice and organizational performance.
The first specific objective of the study aimed to determine the effect of performance appraisal
practice on organizational performance of Lion Insurance Share Company. The finding
demonstrated that performance appraisal practice has significant and positive effect on
organizational performance of Lion Insurance Share Company. The test for significance was
showed that the effect was statistically significant. This means that performance appraisal
practice has a higher potential of improving organizational performance level of Lion Insurance
Share Company; so that the company should therefore leverage on this practice and used it as an
important tool for improving the organizational performance.
The second specific objective of the study sought to assess the effect of training and
development practiced on organizational performance of Lion Insurance Share Company.
Results revealed that training and development practice has significant and positive effect on
organizational performance of Lion Insurance Share Company. This is supported by the test for
significance which showed that the effect was statistically significant. This means that training
and development has a higher potential of improving organizational performance level of Lion
Insurance Share Company so that company should therefore leverage on this practice and make
it a reference point for improve the organizational performance.
60 | P a g e
The third specific objective of the study intended to assess the effect of compensation and reward
management practice on organizational performance of Lion Insurance Share Company. The
result illustrated that compensation management practice has significant and positive effect
organizational performance of Lion Insurance Share Company. The test for significance also was
showed that the effect was statistically significant. This means that compensation and reward
management practice is good at predicting organizational performance of Lion Insurance Share
Company. This implies that the company should therefore ensure that they leverage on
compensation and reward management practice as one human resource management practice.
Overall, it can be concluded that all the three human resource management practice (performance
appraisal, employee training & development and compensation management) influence
organizational performance of Lion Insurance Share Company positively and significantly. The
improvement of these human resource management practices by company has a higher potential
of improving organizational performance. Thus, it can be concluded that improved human
resource management practices are an increasingly important weapon to ensure the higher
organizational performance. Therefore, the management of Lion Insurance Share Company
should influence these four human resource management practices as a way of improving the
company performance.
5.3 Recommendation
Based on the findings and conclusions of the study, the researcher provides the following
recommendations aimed at ensuring that the human resources strategies and practices adopted by
the company play a positive role in ensuring the improved performance and competitive
advantage of the company.
● As regards the training and development practice, the company should formulate
strategies for both short and long-term training and development policies for their
employees. To achieve this, employees should be involved in all activities of the
company starting from the formulation through implementation and up to evaluation of
training and development strategies. More so, managements should undertake different
HRD programs including continuing education and training, career development, etc. The
61 | P a g e
company managers should also ensure that training needs analysis is conducted regularly
in order to establish the training needs of the employees in line with corporate strategy.
● Concerning the performance appraisal practice, the company should follow up the
performance management process closely. The company needs to re-evaluate its
performance appraisal within the context of its corporate and HR strategy to ensure that
they are consistent with the necessary performance measures required by the insurance
sector. Hence, the company should apply standard techniques for employees’ job
evaluation, performance measurement and audit as a routine work. The study also
recommends that different raters can be used to increase the accuracy of performance
evaluation and increase employee’s perceptions of fairness. Different raters are capable
of evaluating everything that entails a job where the managers may not succeed.
Customers’ evaluation of the individuals working within the company can be essential in
boosting their performance. Subordinate evaluations and peers or co-workers should be
used to give valuable information to better evaluate the individual performance. On the
basis of the result, their duties and responsibilities should be redesigned and restructured.
Because it will reduce the repetitive work and reduce monotonous environment. The
measurement mechanisms also should be clear and measured accordingly.
● Regarding compensation and reward management, the company should make review on
compensation system of the industry and should make adjustment if the variance is
crucial. The benefit packages also should be revised and make a proper adjustment. More
so, the reward should be given to the officers who are performing better than others and
such incentives should be kept as a variable factor. The management should relate pay
rise directly to performance. The company should also insist on doing the proper job
analysis in the organizations along with wages and salaries. The company should offer
attractive incentive pay that will be specifically designed to link certain predetermined
behavior or outcome in order to meet the performance standards.
62 | P a g e
5.4 Area for Further Research
Although this research provides some significant insights into human resource management
practices of Lion Insurance Share Company, there is still a chance to extend the findings to gain
a more comprehensive understanding. Due to time and budget constraints this research was
geographically delimited to employees of head office in Addis Ababa. Therefore, any future
endeavor might include employees working outside the capital city if there are any variances in
the study findings. The future research may also highlight human resource management practice
in insurance industry in wider sample and comparative analysis on human resource management
practice in insurance industry. More so, further research in the areas of human resource
management practices would be useful in understanding the impact that the practices have on
other performance indicators like employee performance, employee engagement and employee
job satisfaction.
63 | P a g e
REFERENCE
Armstrong M. (2006). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practices,10th ed.,
Cambridge University Press, Great Britain.
Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P.R., Quinn-Mills, D., & Walton, R.E. (1984); Managing
Human Assets. New York: Free Press.
Bos-Nehles, A. C., Riemsdijk, M., & Looise, J., (2013). Employee Perceptions of Line
Management Performance: Applying the AMO Theory to Explain the Effectiveness of Line
Managers' HRM Implementation, Human Resource Management, 52(6), 1–17.
Bratton J. and Gold J., (2007). Human Resources Management, Theory and Practice, Palgrave
Macmillan, UK.
Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2011). Business Research Methods,11th, edition. India, New Delhi
Cothari, C. (2004). Research Methodology; Methods and Techniques. (2nd ed). New Delhi,
India: New age International Publishers.
Dawson, C. (2009). Introduction to Research Methods: A practical guide for anyone undertaking
a research project. United Kingdom, Newtec Place, How To Books Ltd.
64 | P a g e
Delery, J. and D. Doty (1996), Models of theorizing in strategic human resource management:
tests of universalistic, contingency and configurational performance prediction, Academy of
Management Journal, 39(4), 802–835.
Dessler, G. (2007). Human Resource Management, (11th Ed.). New Delhi: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Fix, B., (2018), The Trouble with Human Capital Theory, Real-World Economics Review,
World Economics Association, Bristol, Issue no. 86, Pp. 15-32.
Gill, J. & Johnson, P. (2002). Research Methods for Managers, (3rded.). England, London: Sage
Publications.
Grant, R. M., (1999). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for
Strategy Formulation, California Management Review, 33(3), 114- 135.
HafsaShaukat, Namrah Ashraf and Shahzad Ghafoor (2015), Impact of Human Resource
Management Practices on Employees Performance: Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research
23 (2): 329-338.
Hamzah Mohammad A. Al_Qudah, Abdullah Osman, Hamzah Edris M. Al_Qudah (2014), The
Effect of Human Resources Management Practices on Employee Performance: International
Journal of scientific & Technology Research volume 3, Issue 9.
Haque, M. F., Haque, M. A., & Islam, S., (2014). Motivational Theories – A Critical Analysis.
ASA University Review, 8(1), 61- 68.
Hartel, K. (2007). Human Resource Management: Transforming Theory into Innovative Practice.
Pearson Education: Australia.
Harzing, A. (2004). International Human Resources Management (2nd Ed), London: Sage
Publications Ltd. 216.
65 | P a g e
Kothari, C. (2004). Research Methodology. Methods and Techniques. (2nded). India, New
Delhi: New age International Publishers.
Lavrakas, P. (2008). Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. United States of America, Los
Angeles; Sage Publications.
McGraw-Hill Publishing.
Michael Armstrong (2014), Armstrong’s Hand Book of Human Resource Management Practice,
thirteenth edition, Printed and bound in the UK by Ashford Colour press Ltd.
Mweru, M. C., & Muya, M. (2015), Features of Resource Based View Theory: An Effective
Strategy in Outsourcing, International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 3(2),
215-218.
Olanyan, D. & Okemakinde, T., (2008), Human Capital Theory: Implication for Educational
Development, Pakistan Journal of social sciences. 5(5), 479-483.
Richardson, M. & Smith, T. (1993). A test of Multivariate Normality in Stock Returns. Journal
of Business. Vol. 66(2) 295-391.
Rob, J. (2010). Likert items and scales, Survey Question Bank: Methods Fact Sheet1 (march
2010). University of Strathclyde.
Samuel, M. O., & Chipunza, C. (2009). Employee retention and turnover: Using motivational
variables as a panacea. African Journal of Business Management, 3(8), 410-415.
Stainer, G.T. (2012). Introduction: from personnel management to human resource management,
A critical Text, Thomson Learning. London.
66 | P a g e
Susan, J. (2004). Likert scales: how to use them. Blackwell Publishing Ltd Medical Education
2004; 38: 1212–1218
Tabachnick, B. & Fidell, L. (2007). Using the multivariate statistics (5thed.). USA, Boston, Allyn
and Bacon publisher.
Verquer, M, Beehr TA, and Wagner, SH (2003). A meta-analysis of the relations between
person-organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63:473–489.
Wilcox, R. (1999). Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing. England, London;
Academic Press.
67 | P a g e
Appendix I: Questionnaire
The purpose of this questionnaire is to collect data for post graduate study at St. Mary’s
University for the study entitled " The Effect of human resource management practices on
organizational performance: The case of Lion Insurance Company S.C.". This questionnaire
is required to assist in determining the objectives of the study. Your privacy will be kept
anonymously and, therefore, no one knows who provided the information. Any information
provided will be used for academic purpose only and will be treated in strict confidence.
Therefore, you are kindly requested to provide your responses to different questions below.
Thank you in advance for agreeing to participate in this study.
Instruction: - Circle your response or indicate "√" in the box beneath for each question. You
don’t need to write your name.
1. a) Male
Sex: b) Female
a) 18-25years c. 41-55 years
2. Age:
b) 26-40 years d. over 55 years
a) Primary school d. First Degree
3. Education level b) Secondary school e. Master Degree and above
c) Diploma
a) 1 – 5 years
For how long have you been b) 6 – 10 years
4.
employed in this company? c) 11 – 15 years
d) > 15 years
a) Clerical
5. Position in the Organization? b) Professional
c) Managerial
68 | P a g e
Section II. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PRACTICE
Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statements by putting √ in the space
provided. 5= Strongly Agree 4=Agree 3 = Neutral 2= Disagree 1=Strongly Disagree
SN. Performance Appraisal Standard Measures (PSM) Rating scale
SA(5) A(4) N(3) D(2) SD(1)
69 | P a g e
SECTION III: Human Resource Development Practices Questionnaire.
Please put (√) mark against each question that indicate your level of agreement for each question.
5= Strongly Agree, 4 =Agree, 3= Neutral, 2= Disagree, 1=Strongly Disagree
No. Item 1 2 3 4 5
HRD practice in the context of Polices, directives & resources
1. The company has defined training and development policy.
2. HRD practices are conducted based on rules and regulations.
Training and development Policies and programs are integrated to
3.
the objectives of the organization
There is serious attention to allocate sufficient budget and
4
resource for the training and development
HRD Needs Assessment Practice
In the company, there is SMART manual & instrument of need
5.
assessment.
6. The need assessment checklist filled without bias and is genuine.
The training & development need analysis methods enable to
7.
clearly identify the employees’ skill and knowledge gap.
Training and development need analysis conducted is able to
8.
produce relevant findings on performance gaps.
HRD Plans, Objectives and Roles
9. Training and development objectives are set in advance
The Company training and development plan preparation allow
10. the participation of all employees.
Training and development program of the Company is designed in
11. compatible with the actual job to be performed.
Training and development programs allow acquiring skills,
12. knowledge and attitude and improve employee’s performance.
Methods of Training & Development Delivery Practice
The Company gives both on-the-job and off-the-job training.
13.
The delivery method that the Company employed is proper to
14. acquire the necessary knowledge, skills and attitudes.
The Company is employed trainee- centered training and
15. development as well as delivery method.
70 | P a g e
No. Item 1 2 3 4 5
Training and Development Evaluation Practice
The organization evaluates the training and development practice
17. before, on the process and after the program
The organization use feedback at the end of the training and
18. development program
Training evaluation is used to identify potential candidate for
19. current training & future development
Training evaluation assesses the gap before and after delivery of
20. the training
No Item 1 2 3 4 5
Pay
1. I feel I am being paid a fair amount for the work I do.
2. I am satisfied with my current salary.
3. My salary is competitive with similar jobs I might find elsewhere.
4 My salary does match with cost of living in the country.
Benefits
5. I am not satisfied with the benefits I receive.
6. The benefit package we have is equitable.
7. The benefits we receive are as good as most other organizations
offer.
8. There are no benefits we do not have which we should have.
Rewards
9. There are more rewards for those who work here.
10. I do feel my efforts are rewarded the way they should be.
11. I do feel that the work I do is appreciated
12. When I do a good job, I receive the recognition for it that I should
receive.
71 | P a g e
Part V: Organizational Performance Measure
Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statements by putting √ in the space
provided. 5= Strongly Agree 4=Agree 3 = Neutral 2= Disagree 1=Strongly Disagree
NO. Compensation SD D N AG SD
1 2 3 4 5
1. Amount of company net income has been increasing over
the time.
2. The company market share has increased over time.
72 | P a g e
Appendix II: List of Sample Branch Offices
1. Main Branch, (Lion Insurance Building, Haile Gebreselasse Avenue)
2. Genet Branch (K.Kare Building, Around Genet Hotel)
3. Gerji Branch (Sami Building, Near Imperial Hotel)
4. Gofa Branch (Gofa Mazoria, Near Gofa Hotel)
5. Kality Branch (Kaleb Building, Near Kality Customs Office)
6. Raguel Branch (Merkato Maekel Building, Near Reguel Church)
7. Olmpiya Branch (Getu Commercial Center, Bole Road)
8. Cathedral Branch (Country Trading Building, Piassa).
9. Messalemia Branch (Keremela Building, Infront of cross country Bus Station)
10. Lideta Branch (Dashen Bank Building , Lideta )
11. Stadium Branch (Yeha Real Estate Building, Stadium Area)
12. T/Haimanot Branch (Geotraco Building, Teklehaymanot area)
13. Gurdshola Branch (Daminarof Building, Gurdshola area)
14. Bole Medhanealem Branch (Berhane Africa Building, Bole Medhanealem area)
15. Kazanchis Branch (Nega City Mall Building, Kazanchis area)
16. Arat Kilo Branch(Dink Sira Building ,Arat Kilo Area )
17. Hayahulet Branch(Comet Building, Near to Axum Hotel)
18. Lebu Branch(Sara Building, Lebu Area)
73 | P a g e
Appendix III: Regression Result
Regression Tables
b
Model Summary
Mod R R Adjusted R Std. Error of Durbin-
el Square Square the Estimate Watson
a
1 .702 .493 .481 3.558 1.708
a. Predictors: (Constant), CM, TD, PA
b. Dependent Variable: OP
a
ANOVA
Model Sum of df Mean Square F Sig.
Squares
b
Regression 1588.321 3 529.440 41.831 .000
1 Residual 1632.702 129 12.657
Total 3221.023 132
a. Dependent Variable: OP
b. Predictors: (Constant), CM, TD, PA
a
Coefficients
Model Unstandardized Standardized T Sig. 95.0% Confidence Correlations Collinearity
Coefficients Coefficients Interval for B Statistics
B Std. Beta Lower Upper Zero- Partial Part Tolerance VIF
Error Bound Bound order
(Constant) -45.93 7.710 -5.957 .000 -61.18 -30.67
1
PA .361 .083 .332 4.347 .000 .197 .526 .593 .357 .273
TD .335 .120 .212 2.789 .006 .097 .573 .526 .239 .175 .675 1.48
CM .596 .154 .310 3.882 .000 .292 .900 .597 .323 .243 .680 1.47
a. Dependent Variable: Organizational Performance
Residuals Statisticsa
Minimu Maximu Mean Std. N
m m Deviation
Predicted Value 23.12 37.67 29.54 3.469 133
Std. Predicted Value -1.852 2.344 .000 1.000 133
Standard Error of
.315 1.101 .597 .157 133
Predicted Value
Adjusted Predicted Value 22.79 37.46 29.53 3.473 133
Residual -7.748 8.408 .000 3.517 133
Std. Residual -2.178 2.363 .000 .989 133
Stud. Residual -2.211 2.393 .001 1.005 133
Deleted Residual -7.984 8.617 .010 3.637 133
Stud. Deleted Residual -2.245 2.438 .002 1.012 133
Mahal. Distance .044 11.658 2.977 2.107 133
Cook's Distance .000 .136 .009 .016 133
Centered Leverage Value .000 .088 .023 .016 133
a. Dependent Variable: Organizational Performance
74 | P a g e
Regressions Charts
75 | P a g e
76 | P a g e
77 | P a g e