Part C-Professional Ethics
Part C-Professional Ethics
Content:
These principles collectively form the foundation of a comprehensive code of ethics, guiding individuals
within the organization to make ethical decisions and contribute to a positive organizational culture. It's
important for organizations to communicate these principles effectively and integrate them into their day-
to-day operations.
Integrity-based programs
An integrity-based approach combines a concern for the law with an emphasis on managerial
responsibility for ethical behavior. Integrity strategies strive to define companies' guiding values,
aspirations and patterns of thought and conduct. When integrated into the day-to-day operations of an
organization, such strategies can help prevent damaging ethical lapses, while tapping into powerful human
impulses for moral thought and action.
Whistleblowing is the disclosure by an employee of illegal, immoral or illegitimate practices on the part
of the organization. This may appear to be in the public interest, but confidentiality is very important in
the accountants' code of ethics. Whistleblowing frequently involves financial loss for the whistleblower.
(a) Whistleblowers may lose their jobs.
(b) A whistleblower who is a member of a professional body cannot, sadly, rely on that body to take a
significant interest, or even offer a sympathetic ear. Some professional bodies have narrow interpretations
of what is meant by ethical conduct. For many, the duties of commercial confidentiality are felt to be more
important.
An issue of trust Whatever the situation, there is a public expectation (especially regarding professionals)
that organizations will act ethically. This is known as the 'Trust me' model and was the case for many years
when most businesses were owned by families. Times have now changed and most companies are now
run by directors and mangers rather than fathers and sons and the model changed to 'Involve me' as more
evidence was needed of their ethical credentials.
In recent times, trust in business has fallen and increasingly more evidence is required to demonstrate it.
The 'Show me' stage required some demonstration of trust, 'Prove to me' required independent
verification and assurance and the final stage of 'Obey me' would exist when the law creates legislation to
cure instances of unethical behavior. We are some way off this point currently.
What caused this trust to disintegrate? Since the 1980s, the UK has seen a procession of corporate
disasters including the names of Barings Bank, Polly Peck and Maxwell. The US has seen scandals
concerning WorldCom, Enron and Tyco. Europe did not escape and has seen its share of problems with
Parmalat while, in Asia, Mitsubishi Motors and Daewoo have had issues too. All these scandals have
severely knocked public confidence and trust in major corporations.
In an attempt to counter this lack of trust, many corporations have developed ethical strategies and
policies to provide guidance and training for their employees. The strategy is set by the leadership and this
will feed into all areas of the business and become part of the cultural DNA of the organization.
Such corporate values also guide staff as to the expectations that employers have regarding their behavior.
The aim is to end up with consistent behavior across the workforce in terms of personal conduct and
professionalism. These policies are enforced on a voluntary basis and results are monitored through
audits, surveys and interviews.
Ethical dilemmas are situations where two ethical values or requirements seem to be incompatible. They
can also arise where two conflicting demands or obligations are placed on an individual.
A conflict of interest arises where an individual has a duty to two or more parties. While working,
information or other matters may arise that mean they cannot continue work for one party without
harming another. Conflicts of interest are not wrong in themselves but they will become a problem if a
professional continues with a course of action while being aware of, and not declaring, them.
Where society believes that businesses are not conducting themselves correctly, laws may be introduced
to ensure a minimum level of behavior is followed. Examples of this include laws created to deal with
environmental issues, cartels and unfair competition, as well as fraud, insider dealing, bribery and
corruption.
Ethical dilemmas involve unclear choices of what is right and wrong. In fact the choice could be what is
the least wrong course of action to take. In such circumstances there is little an individual can do but to
seek advice and trust their own instincts to make the correct choice.
Remember that laws do not necessarily help an individual to resolve an ethical issue – indeed many
members of society feel torn when their personal ethics lead them to feel that following a particular law
is immoral. That said, where a professional duty conflicts with statute, ACCA's advice is clear – the law
overrides it every time.
Ethics and contractual obligations
Contractual obligations differ from statute in the sense that an individual enters into a contract voluntarily;
there is no voluntary element to statutory obligations.
This means an individual may break contractual obligations without breaking the law. For this reason,
professional ethics should be followed even if this is at the expense of a contractual obligation. Logically
this means that, given the choice of breaking professional ethics or a term in your contract of employment,
you must give the profession priority. The law and employment tribunals will support an employee whose
employer required them to break their professional ethics – the problem is that many employees would
not want to go to court over such matters.
However, within the context of ethical considerations and the IFAC Code of Ethics, the mentioned options
align with general principles of transparency, accountability, and professional conduct. Let's break down
how these options might be perceived in the context of IFAC standards:
A number of options are available for accountants wishing to raise ethical issues, for example:
• Directly with their accountancy body
• Within their organization via a help or whistleblower line
• To external organizations such as customers, suppliers or agents
• Anonymously
Anonymously:
Anonymously reporting ethical concerns, while not explicitly addressed by the IFAC Code of Ethics, can be
seen as a practical consideration to protect the whistleblower from potential retaliation. This aligns with
the overarching principles of confidentiality and integrity.
It's important to note that the specific procedures for raising ethical issues may vary depending on the
jurisdiction, the accountancy body, and the organization's internal policies. Accountants are encouraged
to familiarize themselves with the relevant guidelines and procedures provided by their professional
accountancy body, which may incorporate or reference the IFAC Code of Ethics.