Organic agriculture and its

benefits for climate and

biodiversity
Summary
Changing the way we produce food can make a big difference in mitigating climate change, can help farmers to
adapt and to become more resilient, and can contribute to biodiversity protection. Organic farming offers a
systemic approach for reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and increasing soil carbon sequestration while
sustaining healthy soils and protecting biodiversity.

Organic consumes less energy and reduces GHG emissions

• Instead of being dependent on external fossil-fuel intensive fertilizer or pesticide inputs, organic farming
relies on establishing closed nutrient cycles and minimizing nitrogen losses. This can reduce global
agricultural GHG emissions by around 20%.
• Refraining from synthetic fertilizer use reduces nitrous oxide emissions from soil by 40% per hectare in
organic systems.
• Animals in organic systems have access to free range areas, are allowed to graze as much as possible
and 60% of the feed has to come from the farm or the same region. The reduced number of animals
and grassland-based systems reduce emissions and improve carbon stocks in soil.
• Organic agriculture often uses improved manure management such as manure composting which can
reduce nitrous oxide and methane emissions from manure by 50% and 70% respectively.
• Organic agriculture has a higher energy efficiency and a lower energy use per hectare. It consumes
around 15% less energy per unit produced compared to conventional agriculture

Organic sequesters and stores more carbon

Many common practices in organic farming, such as crop rotations including legumes or reduced tillage, help to
improve soil quality and fertility and contribute significantly to higher soil organic carbon stocks of up to
additional 3.5±1.1 tonnes of carbon per hectare compared to land under conventional management.

Organic protects species and habitat diversity

The prohibition of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides and biodiversity-enhancing practices, such as diverse crop
rotations with legumes, landscape elements or reduced tillage, lead to on average 30% more species and 50%
more individuals in organically managed areas.

Organic supports ecosystem functions

Organic farming promotes soil health and reduces soil erosion by 22%. It protects water bodies by reducing
nitrate leaching by 28-39%. Organic has a positive impact on crop pollination and increases natural pest control.

Organic increases the resilience of farming systems

The improved soil structure in organic farming reduces erosion, supports plant health and makes organic more
resilient to changing weather conditions. Organic farming does not rely on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides,
which makes the organic system less dependent to external inputs. The enhanced biodiversity in organic systems
favours stable yields during drought periods and adaptation to future environmental conditions.

Policy recommendations
• Adopt a systemic approach to reduce negative environmental impacts from food production.
• Carbon farming has to take a holistic and multi-dimensional approach, to deliver on climate
mitigation, adaptation, biodiversity and other environmental objectives.
• Ensure that the CAP Strategic Plans are ambitious and contribute fairly to the target of 25% of EU
agricultural land under organic management by 2030 as stated in the Farm to Fork and Biodiversity
Strategies.
• Strengthen the support, through relevant “on top” agri-environmental-climate schemes and advisory
services, for sustainable farming practices that provide public goods and support the transition
towards agroecology.
• Ensure a good representation of organic in upcoming research programmes to further improve the
environmental benefits of organic farming.

Rue du Commerce 124 – 1000 Brussels – Belgium – Phone: +32 2 280 12 23 – Email: [email protected]
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Introduction
Climate change and its consequences pose a severe threat to our agricultural systems and food production as
such and it is one of the biggest challenges we face today. According to the IPCC the last decade already
experienced a global surface temperature increase above 1°C, compared to 1850-1900, while warming over land
is generally higher than over the ocean. Furthermore, an increase in frequency and intensity of climate and
weather extremes like heatwaves, heavy precipitation and droughts can be observed and have a big impact on
agricultural production.1 Time is very limited to still steer the wheel around but changing the way we produce
food can make a big difference in mitigating climate change and helping farmers to adapt and become more
resilient. The 2022 IPCC report on mitigation states that agriculture and other land use can help removing and
storing carbon; they can however not compensate for delayed emissions reductions in other sectors. 2 Organic
farming holds a big potential in reducing GHG emissions and increasing soil carbon sequestration while sustaining
healthy soils and protecting biodiversity and ecosystem functions.

Agriculture contributes directly to around 10% of the EU GHG emissions, and more than 80% of these are
methane emissions from livestock production due to enteric fermentation and nitrous oxides emissions from
soils.3 However, when all emissions linked to food production are taken into account, it is estimated that they
are responsible for up to 21-37% of global emissions. 4 Besides direct agricultural emissions this concerns
emissions linked to the production of feed and its impact on deforestation, and emissions linked to the
production of inputs such as synthetic fertilisers. Around 80% of agriculture land is used for animal production
as grazing land or arable land for feed production while producing only 18% of the world’s calories supply and
less than 40% of the global protein supply. 5 Moreover, changes in land use including agriculture are one of the
main drivers for biodiversity loss.6

Figure 1 EU agricultural emissions by source and projected emissions (Source: EEA3)

Climate change and most of its consequences like temperature increase or increased extreme weather events
pose an adverse effect on biodiversity and conversely, changes in biodiversity affect the climate system through
impacts on the nitrogen, carbon and water cycle. Climate change impacts habitats and behaviour of species,
including their growth and geographical distribution, and many species are not able to keep up with the pace of
change. Preserving biodiversity and intact and healthy ecosystems are necessary to succeed in climate protection
and adaptation to the consequences of climate change. Healthy ecosystems can contribute to carbon

Rue du Commerce 124 – 1000 Brussels – Belgium – Phone: +32 2 280 12 23 – Email: [email protected]
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
sequestration, they are less susceptible to the negative consequences of climate change and they can mitigate
impacts of droughts, storms and flooding. Intact ecosystems ensure the provision of nature’s contribution to
people such as clean water or healthy soil. 7,8

The joint IPBES/IPCC report from 2021 states that “Safeguarding nature and ensuring a stable climate are thus
vital to support people’s good quality of life.” Although there is a growing understanding and recognition of the
interconnection between climate change and biodiversity loss and the common drivers they share, it is still all
too often looked at from a single perspective and addressed separately. This segregated approach, however, will
fail to point to solutions encompassing multiple benefits and lead to solutions that are not optimal for either
problem. In the worst case maximising one aspect might lead to action counteracting the other objective and
trade-offs with other aspects of sustainability.7

The impact of agricultural practices, food waste and diets must all be considered if we are to understand how
food and farming can positively contribute to biodiversity protection, climate change mitigation and adaptation
while providing healthy diets for all. It is key to consider climate and biodiversity as part of the same complex
problem to maximize the benefits of solutions and focus on multi-objective approaches.7 Land management
must ensure that biodiversity is preserved within the agricultural landscape, pollution from pesticides and
fertilisers is reduced and climate change is curbed. Agriculture is a crucial lever for all of this.

Organic farming offers a way of approaching these challenges taking their complexity into account and promoting
a systemic approach, which is essential to reduce GHG emissions, help the agricultural sector to adapt to climate
change and to support healthy ecosystems. Having a holistic view is intrinsic to the concept of the organic
movement that made it its overarching goal to create sustainable food systems for healthy farms, healthy people
and a healthy planet. Increased conversion to organic agriculture can contribute to the reduction of greenhouse
gas emissions, while also bringing important benefits, such as improved system resilience to the effects of climate
change, maintaining biodiversity on farmland, conserving soil fertility, reducing eutrophication and water
pollution, and improving food security and farmers’ sovereignty. 9 It is crucial to take a food systems view,
focusing not only on mitigation in agricultural production, but considering also consumption patterns, as well as
optimal resource use. Organic agriculture, combined with reduced concentrated feed and animal products, and
the reduction of food waste enables sustainable and climate-friendly agricultural production and food system.
The 2022 IPCC report states that agroecological practices support food security, health and well-being,
biodiversity and ecosystem services.10

The Organic Regulation is the baseline for the benefits that organic farming provides. Several rules have direct
and indirect impact on biodiversity, responsible use of energy, soil and its organic matter content and GHG
emissions.11 In many instances the environmental and climate performance of organic farmers goes beyond the
organic regulation and therefore additional and optimised practices and resulting benefits should be rewarded
and incentivized by the EU and Member States through on-top agri-environment-climate measures to further
enhance the delivery of public goods. However, in only a few countries have options for agri-environment-
climate measures been developed to capitalise specifically on the baseline of organic farming standards. 12

The multiple benefits of organic farming

Organic consumes less energy and reduces GHG emissions
Organic management shows a positive impact on soil-based greenhouse gas emissions. On average the climate
protection performance of organic results in 1082 kg CO2 eq per hectare and year, due to lower GHG emissions
and increased carbon sequestration in soils.13

Rue du Commerce 124 – 1000 Brussels – Belgium – Phone: +32 2 280 12 23 – Email: [email protected]
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
• Lower emissions due to prohibition of synthetic fertilizers use
The production, transportation and use of fossil fuel-based fertilizers require large energy inputs and
significantly contribute to GHG emissions from agriculture. Since synthetic fertilizers are prohibited in
organic agriculture and consequently the emissions associated with it are absent the GHG emissions of
organic farming are significantly reduced. Studies show that the emission reduction potential by an
absence of synthetic fertilizer use is around 20% of the global annual agricultural GHG emissions. 14
Instead of being dependent on external fertilizer inputs, organic farming relies on seeking to close
nutrient cycles through natural fixation of nitrogen, the recycling of organic manures and minimizing
nitrogen losses. This helps to optimise available nutrients resulting in generally lower nitrogen levels on
organic farms.

• Lower nitrous oxide emissions from soil

The use of synthetic fertilizer also contributes to other agricultural emissions, namely nitrous oxide.
While nitrous oxide from soils can be released in all farming systems to some extent, the application of
synthetic fertilizer increases the emission on site.13 Studies show a reduction of 40% less nitrous oxide
emissions per hectare for organic systems. 15 Nitrous oxide is another major direct GHG emission in
agriculture and a reduction of nitrogen application rates is therefore an effective way to reduce
emissions.

• No production of plant protections chemicals

The production of pesticides requires a considerable amount of energy, even though it makes up only a
fraction of the energy needed for fertiliser production. Estimates of the total GHG emissions, however,
vary widely.16 Since the use of synthetic plant protection agrochemicals is prohibited in organic farming,
the emissions associated with their production are thus avoided.

• Reduced emissions from livestock

Besides nitrous oxide emissions, methane from enteric fermentation makes up most of the GHG
emissions from agriculture. Considering it being the main share of agricultural emissions, it is a key area
to look for emission reduction in the sector. Organic farming sets clear rules on how many animals are
allowed per hectare with the objective of not exceeding the holding capacity of the land. A reduced
number of animals lowers the emissions connected with synthetic fertiliser in particular as well as
manure management, reduces the nitrogen application rate and avoids over-fertilization of land. 42%
of organic land are pastures and meadows mostly used for grazing organic livestock 17; animals in organic
systems are kept outside and allowed to graze as much as possible. The EU organic regulation requires
60% of the feed to come from the farm or the same region. This feed composition reduces imports of
concentrated feed from outside the EU, where land use changes to produce feed contribute to the
global GHG emissions. Using cows with an increased lifespan or breeds of cattle that provide both milk
and meat are other measures to decrease the emission per unit product in dairy production and are well
suited to organic farming systems.18

• Improved manure management

Manure management accounts for around 15% of the agricultural GHG emissions.3 Improved
techniques, such as manure composting is often used in organic agriculture and it can reduce nitrous
oxide by 50% and methane emissions by 70%.9 Reducing emissions from manure management aims for
limiting the anaerobic generation of methane or using closed storage to capture methane and use it for
instance as biogas. However, in order for biogas production to be sustainable and not negate its benefits
through indirect land use changes, it has to exploit waste and residues and not rely on the large-scale
cultivation of energy crops (e.g. maize).19

• Lower energy input of organic production

Organic agriculture bases its production on on-farm processes instead of being dependent on external
energy inputs. Nitrogen fixating legumes, such as clover grass leys, and the use of organic manure to
recycle nutrients help to build up soil fertility.13 Overall, organic agriculture shows a lower energy use
per hectare and per unit product. Studies suggests that around 15% less energy are consumed in organic

Rue du Commerce 124 – 1000 Brussels – Belgium – Phone: +32 2 280 12 23 – Email: [email protected]
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
 agriculture per unit produced. 20 A study in Switzerland shows, that even though organic farming uses
sometimes more machinery and performs more mechanical weeding, the energy demand per hectare
was between 22% and 35% lower per year than conventional farming and per kg harvested dry matter
it ranged from 2% to 17% lower energy demand.21

Organic sequesters and stores more carbon

Soil organic matter content in arable soils has been declining across the EU, the main drivers being land
management and climate. 22 Many common practices of organic farming help to improve soil quality and fertility
and contribute significantly to higher soil organic carbon sequestration compared to land under conventional
management. The use of organic fertilizer like composted waste from livestock husbandry, improved crop
varieties, crop rotations including legumes, reduced tillage and planting of cover crops contribute to the
increased carbon storage. A global analysis shows higher soil organic carbon stocks in land under organic
management compared to land under conventional management (by 3.5±1.1 tonnes of carbon per hectare) and
to higher annual sequestration rates (up to 0.5±0.2 tonnes of carbon per hectare and year).23 An analysis across
Europe shows that reduced tillage under organic farming clearly increases the soil organic carbon content in the
surface layer by more than 20% compared to ploughing 24. Studies conducted in Switzerland show an increase in
topsoil organic carbon by 25% with conversion to reduced tillage.25 Besides climate mitigation, a high humus
content also contributes to increased water infiltration and retention, hence reduces erosion and generally
improves plant health.26,27 However, carbon is not only stored in soils, but it can also be sequestered by landscape
elements like hedgerows.i

SOLMACC – towards greater climate change mitigation and adaptation

SOLMACC (Strategies for Organic and Low input farming to Mitigate and
Adapt to Climate Change) was an EU project that demonstrated that farming
can be climate-friendly by applying a combination of optimised organic
farming practices to respond to climate change. Across Europe, 12
demonstration farms changed their farming practices over the course of five
years under close scientific monitoring and supervision. The practices were
linked to optimised on-farm nutrient management, optimised crop rotation,
optimised tillage system and agroforestry. The farms mainly reduced their
on-farm GHG emissions following the adoption of new practices, increased
biodiversity and they were able to improve the soil quality. The yields of the
participating farms even increased in some cases.

Organic farming protects species and habitat diversity at the field and farm scale
The positive effect of organic farming systems on flora and fauna compared to conventional systems has been
demonstrated in numerous studies. 28,29 This is the case for both on individual fields and at farm level and above
and below-ground biodiversity. Organically managed areas have on average 30% more species and 50% more
individuals.30,31,32 The strongest positive effect of organic farming on biodiversity is seen in one-year arable crops,
followed by special crops (viticulture, orchards), with the smallest effects having been demonstrated in grassland.
However, there is yet only a small number of studies focussing on the impact of organic grassland management.
A study from Germany noted that plant species numbers in organic and extensive conventional systems were
slightly higher than in intensively managed permanent grassland.33 Organic farming can also support rare insects
and spiders and increasing their abundance by 55% and their diversity by 27% compared to conventional farming.
Furthermore, rare plant species of open arable land are found in higher diversity and densities on organic farms.34
It has been shown that organic farming has a positive impact on the diversity and density of pollinators, beneficial
insects, plants, the density of destroyers and the diversity of herbivores.3028,31 Several studies show that organic
farming promotes species diversity, the number of individuals and the reproduction rates of wild bees.35,36

iEven though not part of the EU organic regulation, several private labels include the preservation and construction of landscape elements
(e.g. Naturland) which also have a positive impact on biodiversity.

Rue du Commerce 124 – 1000 Brussels – Belgium – Phone: +32 2 280 12 23 – Email: [email protected]
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Besides a greater diversity in species, organic farms also provide more diverse habitats. Comparisons of organic
farms with conventional farms in Switzerland, Denmark and the UK show that the proportion of semi-natural
areas on organic farms is higher than on conventional farms.37,38,39,40 In many cases, organic farms have smaller
field sizes, a higher diversity of farmland and a more varied land use. Organic farming has the potential to
promote biodiversity not only locally, but also at the landscape level. In cleared landscapes, organic areas cannot
realise their potential for biodiversity.36,41,42,43 With growing proportions of organic areas in the landscape, the
positive effects on biodiversity also continue to increase.44,45,46,47

Figure 2 Differences of biodiversity on organic systems compared to conventional farms (Figure adapted from
Figure 1 in Tuck et al. 201432)

Organic supports ecosystem functions

Biodiversity is an important basis for the functioning of many ecosystem processes and functions. The positive
impact of organic farming on crop pollination increases fruit yield and reduces loss due to misshapen fruit.48
Organic cultivation increases natural pest control in various cases compared to conventional cultivation.32

Soil health is the foundation of organic farming and several features that can be observed in soils under organic
management, such as an improved soil structure, contribute to soil erosion prevention and flood protection.
Organic soils have better soil aggregate stability due to their higher humus content and a higher water infiltration
rate of 137%.49,13 Thus, organic soils are better protected against erosion resulting from heavy precipitation. A
reduction of soil erosion and soil loss was identified to be -22% and -26% respectively in organic farming.13 Soils
from organic farming mineralise 30% more nitrogen from a green manure during drought than soils from
conventional farming.50 The rich biodiversity in soils under organic management result in an active soil life and
a diverse fungal fauna can reduce pathogens in soils.28,51 Organic farming has a big potential in protecting ground-
and surface water. The contamination of water bodies through fertilizers or pesticides is expected to be lower.
Nitrate leaching was shown to be reduced by 28-39% in organically farmed systems.13 In addition, the avoidance
of pesticides has a positive impact on water resources since the input of these substances with a potential toxicity
and detrimental effects on the environment are restricted. The restricted use of veterinary drugs in livestock
systems has a lower negative impact on water resources too.13

Rue du Commerce 124 – 1000 Brussels – Belgium – Phone: +32 2 280 12 23 – Email: [email protected]
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Furthermore, the reduced use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides limits the negative impact of agricultural
practices on air quality. Organic farming reduces emissions of ammonia, particulate matter, oxides of nitrogen,
carbon and sulphur, as well as volatile organic compounds and pathogens, which all have adverse effects on
human health.9 52

Liivimaa Lihaveis – organic grass-fed beef enhancing biodiversity

The Baltic grasslands are very diverse and contain more than 70
species per square meter. A collective farmer initiative of
Estonian organic beef farmers founded the NGO Liivimaa
Lihaveis and developed an organic grass-fed beef quality
scheme aiming to give more added-value to their products. The
management of biodiversity rich semi-natural grassland
enhances and maintains diverse and plentiful species and
habitats while contributing to carbon sequestration. The
scheme ensures high animal welfare practices on the farms, and
it helps to maintain active and socially resilient communities in
©Liivimaa Lihaveis rural Estonia.

Organic increases the resilience of farming systems

Consequences of climate change such as more intense and frequent heatwaves, heavy precipitation, droughts
and other extreme weather events, can already be observed today and will certainly increase in the future.
Agricultural production will have to adapt to these conditions to withstand the additional pressure of pests,
diseases and climate variability to ensure resilient food systems. Organic farms often cultivate a higher crop
diversity, locally adapted species and sustain more biodiversity in and around their production area. The
importance of soil health, building up soil organic matter and promoting a soil rich in beneficial microorganisms
allows a higher water capture and retention capacity, reduces erosion, supports plant health and makes organic
more resilient to changing weather conditions. The fact that organic farming uses legumes for nitrogen fixation
and organic manure and does not rely on synthetic fertilizer, makes the organic system also less dependent to
external inputs of non-renewable resources which are often fossil-fuel intensive. The sustainable use of
resources, diversification of production systems and the capacity for self-organisation and innovation are
essential for socio-economic resilience.

Resilience and adaptability to adverse climate conditions such as extreme weather events and other
environmental stressors is enhanced by species and habitat diversity.53 Crops in organically managed systems
can produce higher yields under very dry conditions than comparable crops in conventional management. For
example, as shown in studies the yield of organic maize was 137% and the yield of organic soy was 196% relative
to conventional management during drought periods.54 The positive impact of biodiversity can also be seen in
species-rich meadows, which are more stable in terms of yield during dry periods and have a longer growing
season.55 Genetic diversity ensures adaptation to future environmental conditions and the structurally rich and
heterogeneous landscape promotes the mobility and migration of fauna to new more suitable locations.

Rue du Commerce 124 – 1000 Brussels – Belgium – Phone: +32 2 280 12 23 – Email: [email protected]
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Table 1 Contribution of organic production rules to environmental and climate benefits

Source: European Commission DG AGRI, 2014. Evaluation of the EU legislation on organic farming: study report. Sanders, J.(editor) 11

Additional agroecological practices with multiple benefits

Even though organic agriculture already contributes to climate and biodiversity protection (see Table 1), there
are several additional and optimised farming practices that can be applied on an organic farm. Such practices
include agroforestry, with a high potential to sequester atmospheric carbon, and optimised on-farm nutrient
recycling, like composting manure and crops residues to close nutrient cycles and reduce GHG emissions.
Furthermore, optimised crop rotations, such as the introduction of grain and forage legumes to support soil
fertility, nitrogen fixation and carbon sequestration and optimised tillage systems, like reducing the frequency
or depth of tillage or apply no-till can improve the beneficial effect of organic farming even further.56 Other
management practices that go in line with the principles of organic farming and that hold benefits for the climate
and biodiversity are using appropriate breeds, grassland management and the construction of landscape
elements like hedgerows which can sequester additional carbon and are habitats for many species.

Rue du Commerce 124 – 1000 Brussels – Belgium – Phone: +32 2 280 12 23 – Email: [email protected]
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Biodiverse landscapes delivering public goods
The combination of beneficial practices in organic farming for climate and biodiversity in a systems-based
approach provides synergies with the potential for greater impacts. Agricultural management and biodiversity
enhancement is designed to mutually benefit each other. Organic farming and the benefits associated with its
practices, show how a land sharing approach can be used in a constructive way, alternatively to a separation of
intensive agriculture low in biodiversity with negative impacts on ecosystem functions and land set aside for
nature (see Figure 3). While some species need undisturbed natural habitats, there are several key species, such
as farmland birds and arable wildflowers, that have adapted to agricultural systems and thrived within them. A
further intensification of agricultural activities would negatively impact these farming-adapted species. Lower
intensity, land-sharing approaches such as organic farming, may be better suited to support farmland biodiversity
and they play an important role in the mix of approaches, including nature restoration, to deliver on biodiversity
protection objectives.12

1. Diversity and crop rotations 1. Uniformity and monoculture

2. Recycling nutrients, soil health & fertility and building soil carbon 2. Open nutrient cycle
3. Grass-based animal production 3. Intensive livestock production
4. High animal welfare 4. Less hedgerows and wildlife corridors
5. Unimproved grassland 5. Soil erosion
6. Hedges and field margins for wildlife 6. Use of fossil fuel based inputs
7. Reduced pollution and GHG emissions per acre 7. Increased pollution and GHG emissions per acre
8. Trees and permanent crops 8. Poorer land marginalised ‘for nature’
9. Connecting consumers with their food 9. Increased transport
10. Increased employment and vibrant rural communities 10. Low employment

Figure 3 Organic farming and the public goods it delivers compared to non-organic farming (Source: OF&G
Organic)

In organic farming, yields per area are on average 20% lower.57,58,59,60 However, it has been shown that closing
the yield gap between organic and conventional farming may be a matter of time and yields approached those
of conventional systems after 10-13 years, while at the same time requiring no synthetic nitrogen inputs.62
Observations from the UK have shown that organic wheat yields are similar to conventional wheat yields in the
1970s. For conventional yields to grow more synthetic nitrogen is required. 61 Organic farming can lead to a
greater spatial stability of biotic and abiotic soil processes and improved soil structure and thus secure yields in
the longer term.62 Another factor that reduces the yield gap and gains importance in the light of climate adaption,
is the resilience of organically managed systems to extreme weather conditions, such as droughts. 54 Moreover,
agricultural diversification practices such as multi-cropping and crop rotations have the potential to substantially
reduce the yield gap and as research is advancing and the understanding of organic agricultural practices
increases, the yield gap between organic and conventional production is likely to decrease as well. 57

However, to counterbalance possible lower yields, an increase in organic has to go alongside changes in food
consumption, such as reducing food waste and shift to more plant-based diets. The fact that organic farming is
less dependent on external inputs allows a greater sovereignty, with more control over the agricultural

Rue du Commerce 124 – 1000 Brussels – Belgium – Phone: +32 2 280 12 23 – Email: [email protected]
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
production processes and the associated costs. It empowers farmers by creating agricultural systems that are
more resilient towards the impacts of climate change and by reducing their dependence on external inputs. The
yield levels under conventional farming can only be sustained with the additional input of external products,
such as synthetic fertilizer and pesticides.

Systemic approach is needed

A systemic approach is needed to establish sustainable synergies between different land use purposes such as
food production, biodiversity protection and climate benefits. A ‘sustainable intensification’ agenda, which aims
to increase production with fewer inputs, and therefore free land for nature conservation, focuses on partial
technical solutions which do not halt farm expansion, concentration and specialisation dynamics which are often
major drivers of biodiversity loss and land degradation. 63 According to the study of IDDRI it is possible for a
European agriculture based entirely on agro-ecological practices to provide a balanced diet for all Europeans by
2050.63 Among others, a reduced consumption of animal products and therefore reduction of number of farm
animals and substantial reduction in food waste make it possible to combine nature conservation with high agro-
biodiversity. A combination of extensive herbivore systems and diversified organic cropping systems allows
ambitious biodiversity protection, while reducing GHG emissions.

The sometimes lower yields in organic agriculture lead to a higher GHG intensity per unit product, even if the
emissions are lower when considered per area. Some studies, for example from Austria, show however that
products have on average 25% lower GHG emissions per kg of product in organic production compared to
conventional production. 64 However, focussing on efficiency only is partly misleading and does not take yield
stability over time, resilience and other environmental impacts such as nitrate leaching into groundwater, air
pollution, soil health or biodiversity loss into account, often consequences of intensifying food yield beyond
sustainable limits. Organic farming tends to perform better when it comes to environmental parameters
measured per unit area (Figure 4).65 Many impacts on the environment and ecosystem are mainly relevant within
their ecosystem boundaries which requires a focus on performance not only per unit product but also per
agricultural land area. A comprehensive system approach is needed to address all challenges such as maintaining
soil fertility, nutrient recycling and ecosystem contributions. 66 Current agricultural practices should not
negatively impact the long-term sustainable land use and future yields.

Furthermore, it is important to keep in mind that in Europe an estimated 20% of the food produced ends up
being wasted.67 At the same time the consumption of red meat exceeds recommendations for a healthy diet
whereas much of the agricultural land in Europe is dedicated to livestock, due to feed production. Organic
farming with grassland-based livestock production and adequate stocking rates does not only address nitrate
loss into groundwater but also contributes to animal welfare. The grassland-based system allows the use of
grassland areas which are unsuitable for crop production and reduces pressure on cropland. The reduced
numbers of animals in organic farming in relation to the available agricultural land area and the regional feed go
hand-in-hand with improved environmental indicators, animal welfare, lower GHG emissions and carbon storage
whereas intensive livestock production based on imported feed may have negative effects both in Europe and in
the feed producing country. What is needed is therefore not just a focus on production volumes but on how we
can use the available resources more efficiently, through improved distribution, reduction of food waste and
healthy and sustainable diets.

Rue du Commerce 124 – 1000 Brussels – Belgium – Phone: +32 2 280 12 23 – Email: [email protected]
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Figure 4 Average performance per unit area of organic agriculture relative to conventional agriculture
(indicated by the red circle; larger petals represent superior organic performance). Source: Seufert and
Ramankutty (2017) 68

The way forward

A historic lack of scientific support which still continues today, leaves organic farming potential for improvement.
Advancing research, improving crop varieties adapted to organic management and addressing other yield-
limiting factors such as pest control, could contribute to an increased productivity of organic farming. The organic
movement is constantly improving its practices to contribute to climate mitigation, adaptation and biodiversity
protection. Focusing on best practices could further enhance the multiple benefits of organic. Successful
knowledge transfer will be important including an adequate communication of research findings together with
their translation into practice. 69
Organic farming offers various benefits and potential solutions to reduce the climate impact of food production,
support sustainable production in a changing climate while promoting biodiversity at field, farm and landscape
level. It offers a way to provide sustainable and healthy diets in the long term not exceeding planetary boundaries.

Policy recommendations
• Adopt a systemic approach to reduce negative environmental impacts from food production
Organic farming has a systemic approach that reduces the environmental impact compared to
conventional farming. Increasing land under organic farming can contribute to climate mitigation,
improve the resilience of farming systems, contributing to soil health and preserving or improving
biodiversity.

• Carbon farming has to take a holistic and multi-dimensional approach

The European Commission presented the “Sustainable Carbon Cycles” communication, which addresses
how to increase carbon sequestration and to scale up carbon farming as a business model. It is essential
that carbon farming not only delivers on increased carbon sequestration, but ensures at the same time
benefits for climate adaptation, biodiversity, and other environmental objectives. The multiple benefits

Rue du Commerce 124 – 1000 Brussels – Belgium – Phone: +32 2 280 12 23 – Email: [email protected]
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
 of organic farming should be recognized and to avoid trade-offs, clear environmental and biodiversity
safeguards are needed.

• Ensure coherence with the CAP Strategic Plans and the 25% organic target
Ensure that the strategic plans submitted by the Member States are ambitious and contribute to the
significant development of organic farming in the EU to reach the target of 25% of agricultural land
under organic management by 2030 as stated in the Farm to Fork and Biodiversity Strategies.

• Strengthen the support for sustainable farming practices that provide public goods and transition
towards agroecology
Funds should be provided for scaling up organic farming systems. To maximise the environmental and
climate potential of organic farming beyond the scope of organic standards, the EU must ensure that
Member States prioritise organic farming under “on-top” agri-environmental-climate schemes targeted
at climate mitigation, adaptation and other environmental goals (in addition to organic farming
payments). For example, access to relevant schemes can further improve biodiversity and climate
performance through supporting the active management of hedgerows, field boundaries and margins,
birds and other endangered species as well as carbon sequestration. Training and extension work on
agroecological practices should be integrated into education programmes. Adequate and tailored
advisory, knowledge sharing and training that address sustainable land management in a systemic way
to reduce all negative impacts from agriculture should further support the needed transition and shift
in practices.

• Research that further improves organic farming

Ensure a good representation of organic in the upcoming Horizon Europe work programme and support
setting up a network of organic living labs that contribute to climate and biodiversity protection.

Rue du Commerce 124 – 1000 Brussels – Belgium – Phone: +32 2 280 12 23 – Email: [email protected]
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
References
1 IPCC, 2021. Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
2 IPCC, 2022. Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of

Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
3 EEA, 2021. Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture in Europe.
4 IPCC, 2019. Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change,

desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in
terrestrial ecosystems.
5 https://ourworldindata.org/global-land-for-agriculture
6 IPBES, 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services

of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.

7 Pörtner et al, 2021. IPBES-IPCC co-sponsored workshop report on biodiversity and climate change; IPBES and

IPCC.
8 Guntern, J., 2016. Klimawandel und Biodiversität. Auswirkungen und mögliche Stossrichtungen für

Massnahmen im Kanton Zürich. Fachbericht als Grundlage für die Ergänzung des Naturschutzgesamtkonzeptes
des Kantons Zürich im Auftrag der Fachstelle Naturschutz, Amt für Landschaft und Natur. Forum Biodiversität
Schweiz.
9 IFOAM EU and FiBL, 2016. Organic farming, climate change mitigation and beyond. Reducing the environmental

impacts of EU Agriculture.
10 IPCC, 2022. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to

the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

11 European Commission, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, 2014. Evaluation of the

EU legislation on organic farming: study report. Sanders, J. (editor).

12 IFOAM Organics Europe, 2021. Organic Farming and Biodiversity – Policy Options.
13 Sanders, J. and Heß, J. (eds), 2019. Leistungen des ökologischen Landbaus für Umwelt und Gesellschaft. 2.

überarbeitete und ergänzte Auflage. Braunschweig: Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut, 398 p, Thünen Rep 65.
14 Scialabba, N., and Müller-Lindenlauf, M., 2010. Organic agriculture and climate change. Renewable Agriculture

and Food Systems, 25(2), 158-169.

15 Skinner, C. et al, 2019. The impact of long-term organic farming on soil-derived greenhouse gas emissions.

Scientific Reports, 9:1702.

16 Bellarby, J. et al, 2008. Cool farming: Climate impacts of agriculture and mitigation potential. Greenpeace

International, Amsterdam.
17 Eurostat, 2022. Organic farming statistics.
18 IFOAM EU and FiBL, 2016. Organic farming, climate change mitigation and beyond. Reducing the

environmental impacts of EU Agriculture.

19 Sustaingas Project, 2015. Sustainable biogas production in organic farming Project results and impact.
20 Scialabba, N. and Müller-Lindenlauf, M., 2010. Organic agriculture and climate change. Renewable Agriculture

and Food Systems, 25(2), 158-169.

21 Nemecek et al, 2011. Life cycle assessment of Swiss farming systems. I. Integrated and organic farming.

Agricultural systems, 104, 217-232.

22 Stolte, J. et al (eds), 2016. Soil threats in Europe. EUR 27607 EN.
23 Gattinger, A. et al, 2012. Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming. Proceedings of the National

Academy of Sciences, 109, 18226-18231.

24 Krauss, M. et al, 2022. Reduced tillage in organic farming affects soil organic carbon stocks in temperate Europe.

Soil and Tillage Research.

25 Krauss, M. et al, 2020. Enhanced soil quality with reduced tillage and solid manures in organic farming – a

synthesis of 15 years. Scientific reports 10, 4403.

Rue du Commerce 124 – 1000 Brussels – Belgium – Phone: +32 2 280 12 23 – Email: [email protected]
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
26 Bünemann, E. et al, 2018. Soil quality – a critical review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 120, 105-125.
27 Bongiorno, G. et al, 2019. Soil suppressiveness to Pythium ultimum in ten European long-term field
experiments and its relation with soil parameters. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 133, 174-187.
28 Mäder, P., et al, 2002. Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296, 1694-1697.
29 Hole, D. Et al, 2005. Does organic farming benefit biodiversity? Biological Conservation 122, 113-130.
30 Bengtsson, J., Ahnström, J. and Weibull, A.C., 2005. The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and

abundance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 261-269.

31 Smith, O. et al, 2019. Organic farming provides reliable environmental benefits but increases variability in crop

yields: a global meta-analysis. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 3, 82.

32 Tuck, S. et al, 2014. Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: a hierarchical meta-

analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology 51, 746-755.

33 Haas, G. et al, 2001). Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by

process life cycle assessment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 83(1–2).

34 Lichtenberg, E. M. et al, 2017. A global synthesis of the effects of diversified farming systems on arthropod

diversity within fields and across agricultural landscapes. Global Change Biology 23, 4946- 4957.
35 Kremen, C. et al, 2002. Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proceedings

of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99, 16812–16816.

36 Holzschuh, A. et al, 2008. Agricultural landscapes with organic crops support higher pollinator diversity. Oikos

117, 354-361.
37 Aude, E. et al, 2003. Vegetation diversity of conventional and organic hedgerows in Denmark. Agriculture,

Ecosystems and Environment 99, 135-147.

38 Gibson, R. H. et al, 2007. Plant diversity and land use under organic and conventional agriculture: a whole-farm

approach. Journal of Applied Ecology 44, 792-803.

39 Norton, L., P. et al, 2009. Consequences of organic and non-organic farming practices for field, farm and

landscape complexity. Ecosystems and Environment, 129, 221-227.

40 Schader, C. et al, 2008. Umsetzung von Ökomassnahmen auf Bio- und ÖLN-Betrieben. Agrarforschung 15, 506-

511.
41 Henckel, L. et al, 2015. Organic fields sustain weed metacommunity dynamics in farmland landscapes.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Science 282, 1808.

42 Muneret, L. et al, 2019. Organic farming at local and landscape scales fosters biological pest control in

vineyards. Ecological applications, 29(1), 1818.

43 Inclan, D.J. et al, 2015. Organic farming enhances parasitoid diversity at the local and landscape scales. Journal

of Applied Ecology, 52(4), 1102-1109.

44 Tscharntke, T. et al, 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem

service management. Ecology Letters 8 (8), 857-874.

45 Rundlof, M. and Smith, H.G., 2006. The effect of organic farming on butterfly diversity depends on landscape

context. Journal of Applied Ecology 43(6), 1121-1127.

46 Holzschuh, A., et al, 2007. Diversity of flower-visiting bees in cereal fields: effects of farming system, landscape

composition and regional context. Journal of Applied Ecology 44, 41-49.

47 Morandin, L.A. and Winston, M.L., 2005. Wild bee abundance and seed production in conventional, organic,

and genetically modified canola. Ecological Applications 15, 871-881.

48 Andersson, G. et al, 2012. Organic Farming Improves Pollination Success in Strawberries. PLoS ONE 7(2),

e31599.
49 Siegrist, S. et al, 1998. Does organic agriculture reduce soil erodibility? The results of a long-term field study

on loess in Switzerland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 69, 253-264.

50 Lori, M. et al, 2018. Distinct nitrogen provisioning form organic amendments in soil as influenced by farming

system and water regime. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 1-14.

51 Klingen, I. et al, 2002. Effects of farming System, field margins and bait insect on the occurrence of insect

pathogenicfungi in soils. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 91, 191-198.

52 Schader, C., Stolze, M. and Gattinger, A., 2012. Environmental performance of organic farming. In Green

Technologies in Food Production and Processing, Food Engineering Series. Boye, I. and Arcand, Y. (eds.)

Rue du Commerce 124 – 1000 Brussels – Belgium – Phone: +32 2 280 12 23 – Email: [email protected]
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
53 DuVal, A. et al, 2019. The contribution of biodiversity for food and agriculture to the resilience of production
systems –Thematic Study for The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture. FAO, Rome. 85 pp.
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
54 Gomiero, T. et al, 2011. Environmental Impact of Different Agricultural Managemet Practices: Conventional vs.

Organic Agriculture. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 30, 95-124.

55 Oehri, J. et al, 2017. Biodiversity promotes primary productivity and growing season lengthening at the

landscape scale. PNAS 114, 10160-10165

56 www.solmacc.eu
57 Ponisio, L.C. et al, 2015. Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap. Proc. R. Soc. B 282,

20141396.
58 de Ponti, T. et al, 2012. The crop yield gap between organic and conventional agriculture. Agric. Syst. 108, 1–

9.
59 Seufert, V. et al, 2012. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature 485, 229–232.
60 Knapp, S. and van der Heijden, M., 2018. A global meta-analysis of yield stability in organic and conservation

agriculture. Nature Communications 9, 3632.

61 Lampkin, N.H, et al, 2015. The Role of Agroecology in Sustainable Intensification. Report for the Land Use Policy

Group. Organic Research Centre, Elm Farm and Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust.
62 Schrama, M. et al, 2018. Crop yield gap and stability in organic and conventional farming systems. Agriculture,

Ecosystems and Environment. 256, 123-130.

63 Poux, X. and Aubert, P.-M., 2018. An agroecological Europe in 2050: multifunctional agriculture for healthy

eating. Findings from the Ten Years For Agroecology (TYFA) modelling exercise, Iddri-AScA, Study N°09/18, Paris,
France, 74 p.
64 Zamecnik, G. et al, 2021. Klimaschutz und Ernährung – Darstellung und Reduktionsmöglichkeiten der

Treibhausgasemissionen von verschiedenen Lebensmitteln und Ernährungsstilen. Endbericht.

65 Meier, M. S. et al, 2015. Environmental impacts of organic and conventional agricultural products – Are the

differences captured by life cycle assessment? J. Environ. Manage. 149, 193–208.

66 Muller, A. et al, 2017. Strategies for feeding the world more sustainably with organic agriculture. Nature

Communication 8, 1290.
67 FUSION, 2016. Estimates of European food waste levels.
68 Seufert, V. and Ramankutty, N., 2017. Many shades of gray —The context-dependent performance of organic

agriculture. Science advances, 3(3), 1602638.

69 UBA-Verbändeförderprojekt „Dialogplattform Öko-Wissen 2030. Konzepte für die Nutzung und

Weiterentwicklung des Transformationspotenzials der ökologischen Land- und Lebensmittelwirtschaft“, 2021.

Ökologische Landwirtschaft & Klima: Forschungsaufgaben aus Sicht von Bio-Praxis & Zivilgesellschaft.

Published in April 2022.

This publication is co-financed by the LIFE programme of the European Union, under the under
the Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA). This publication only
reflects the views of the authors and its sole responsibility lies with IFOAM Organics Europe.
CINEA is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information provided.

Rue du Commerce 124 – 1000 Brussels – Belgium – Phone: +32 2 280 12 23 – Email: [email protected]
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….