PHASE RELATIONSHIPS OF SOIL
PHASE RELATIONSHIPS OF SOIL
CLASS
10.08.2021-WEEK 3
Course Coordinator
2
INTRODUCTION OF SOIL
INTRODUCTION OF SOIL
SOIL FORMATION
ORIGIN OF SOILS…
Origin of Soils
Soils are formed by weathering of rocks due to mechanical
disintegration or chemical decomposition.
Exposed rocks are eroded and degraded by various physical
and chemical processes.
The products of erosion are picked up and transported to
some other place by wind water etc.
This shifting of material disturbs the equilibrium of forces
on the earth and causes large scale movements and
upheavals.
PHYSICAL WEATHERING
PHYSICAL WEATHERING
CHEMICAL WEATHERING
CHEMICAL WEATHERING
SOIL TYPES…
RESIDUAL SOILS…
RESIDUAL SOILS…
TRANSPORTED SOILS
TYPES OF TRANSPORTED SOILS
Types of Soils
Volume of voids Vv
e
Volume of solids Vs
(2) Porosity n%
Volume of voids Vv
n 100
Total volume of soil sample Vt
Saturated
(3) Degree of SaturationDry
S% (0 – 100%)
Va
PercentageofAirVoids, na =
V
Va
AirContent, ac =
Vv
15/11/17 13
Soil unit weights
(1) Dry unit weight
Note: The density/or unit weight are ratios which connects the
volumetric side of the PHASE DIAGRAM with the mass/or weight side.
Specific Gravity
Weight of a Subs tan ce
Specific Gravity =
Weight of an Equal Volume of Water
s
Gs •Gw = 1
w •Gmercury = 13.6
Relationships Between Various Physical Properties
All the weight- volume relationships needed in soil mechanics
can be derived from appropriate combinations of six
fundamental definitions. They are:
1. Void ratio
2. Porosity
3. Degree of saturation
4. Water content
5. Unit weight
6. Specific gravity
1. Relationship between e and n
ww wVw wVw Vw
w
ws sVs wGsVs GsVs
Se wGs
•This is a very useful relation for solving THREE-PHASE
RELATIONSHIPS.
Soil Unit weight (kN/m3)
15/11/17 19
Weight (Mass) – Volume Relation
Bulk, saturated, dry and submerged unit weights (γ)
are defined in a similar manner.
Here, use weight (kN) instead of mass (kg).
γ = ρg
15/11/17 17
3. Relationship among , e, S and Gs
( Se Gs )
Se wGs w
1 e
e
n d
1 e 1 w
Three Phase System (interms of mass)
Va air Ma=0
Notation Vv
M = mass or weight Vw water Mw
V = volume Mt
s = soil grains Vt
w = water
a = air soil
v = voids Vs Ms
t = total
8
15/11/17
Phase Diagram
Weight Relationship
Water content (w) is a measure of the
water present in the soil.
Va Ma=0
MW air
w= X 100% Vv
MS Vw water Mw
Vt Mt
Expressed as percentage.
9
15/11/17
Phase Diagram
Weight (Mass) – Volume Relation
Bulk density (ρm) is the density of the soil in the
current state.
MT
ρm = Va air Ma=0
VT Vv
Vw water Mw
Units: t/m3, g/ml, kg/m3 Vt Mt
Vs soil Ms
14
15/11/17
Phase Diagram
Weight (Mass) – Volume Relation
Bulk density (ρm) is the density of the soil in the
current state.
MT
ρm = Va air Ma=0
VT Vv
Vw water Mw
Units: t/m3, g/ml, kg/m3 Vt Mt
Vs soil Ms
14
15/11/17
Phase Diagram
Weight (Mass) – Volume Relation
ρ’ = ρsat - ρw
MS
ρd = Va air Ma=0
VT Vv
Vw water Mw
Units: t/m3, g/ml, kg/m3 Vt Mt
Vs soil Ms
16
15/11/17
Phase Diagram
Phase Relations
Consider a fraction of the soil where Vs = 1.
ac = 1 - S
15/11/17 Phase Diagram 22
Phase Relations
M T GS + Se
ρm = = ρW
VT 1+ e
air
M T GS + e e
ρ sat = = ρW Se water Seρ w
VT 1+ e
MS GS soil
ρd = = ρW 1 Gsρ w
VT 1+ e
15/11/17 Phase Diagram 23
Phase Relations
γ
γd =
WT GS + Se 1+ w
γ = = γW
VT 1+ e
air
WS GS e
γd = = γW Se water Seϒ w
VT 1+ e
GS − 1 1 soil Gsϒ w
γ sub = γ sat − γ w = γW
1+ e
Phase Diagram 24
Phase Relations
γ
γd =
WT GS (1+ w) 1+ w
γ = = γW
VT 1+ e
air
e
γ = Gsγ w (1+ w)(1− n) Se water Seϒ w
1 soil
γ d = Gsγ W (1− n) Gsϒ w
Phase Diagram 25
3.2 Weight–Volume Relationships 67
Often, to solve earthwork problems, one must know the weight per unit volume
of soil, excluding water. This weight is referred to as the dry unit weight, d. Thus,
Ws
d 5 (3.11)
V
From Eqs. (3.10) and (3.11), the relationship of unit weight, dry unit weight, and
moisture content can be given as
d 5 (3.12)
11w
g (kg/m3)
(kN/m3) 5
1000
and
g d (kg/m3)
d (kN/m3) 5
1000
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203
68 Chapter 3 | Weight–Volume Relationships
Table 3.1 Void Ratio, Moisture Content, and Dry Unit Weight for Some Typical Soils in a Natural State
W
Weight V
Volume
V 5e
W 5 Gs V 5 Gs
W V 511 e
Ws 5 Gs Vs 5 1
Air W
Water Solid
Figure 3.2 Three separate phases of a soil element with volume of soil solids equal to 1
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203
3.3 Relationships among Unit Weight, Void Ratio, Moisture Content, and Specific Gravity 69
is numerically equal to the void ratio, e [from Eq. (3.3)]. The weights of soil solids
and water can be given as
Ws 5 Gsw
Ww 5 wW
Ws 5 wGsw
Now, using the definitions of unit weight and dry unit weight [Eqs. (3.9) and
(3.11)], we can write
and
Ws Gsw
d 5 5 (3.17)
V 11e
or
Gsw
e5 21 (3.18)
d
Because the weight of water for the soil element under consideration is wGsgw,
the volume occupied by water is
Ww wGsw
Vw 5 5 5 wGs
w w
Vw wGs
S5 5
Vv e
or
Se 5 wGs (3.19)
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203
70 Chapter 3 | Weight–Volume Relationships
W
Weight V
Volume
W 5 e
V 5V 5e
W V511e
Ws 5 Gs Vs 5 1
W
Water Solid
Figure 3.3 Saturated soil element with volume of soil solids equal to one
If the soil sample is saturated—that is, the void spaces are completely filled with
water (Figure 3.3)—the relationship for saturated unit weight (sat) can be derived
in a similar manner:
e 5 wGs (3.21)
(1 1 w)Gsw
Density 5 5 (3.22)
11e
Gs w
Dry density 5 d 5 (3.23)
11e
(Gs 1 e) w
Saturated density 5 sat 5 (3.24)
11e
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203
3.3 Relationships among Unit Weight, Void Ratio, Moisture Content, and Specific Gravity 71
V 5e
M 5 Gs
Ms 5 Gs Vs 5 1
Air W
Water Solid
Figure 3.4 Three separate phases of a soil element showing mass–volume relationship
Equation (3.22) may be derived by referring to the soil element shown in Figure 3.4,
in which the volume of soil solids is equal to 1 and the volume of voids is equal to e.
Hence, the mass of soil solids, Ms, is equal to Gs w. The moisture content has been
defined in Eq. (3.8) as
Ww (mass of water) ? g
w5 5
Ws (mass of solid) ? g
Mw
5
Ms
Mw 5 wM
Ms 5 wGsw
M Ms 1 Mw Gsw 1 wGsw
5 5 5
V Vs 1 Vv 11e
(1 1 w)Gsw
5
11e
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203
72 Chapter 3 | Weight–Volume Relationships
Vv
n5
V
Ws 5 Gsw(1 2 n) (3.25)
Ws 5 wGsw(1 2 n)
Ww 5 wW (3.26)
Ws Gsw(1 2 n)
d 5 5 5 Gsw(1 2 n) (3.27)
V 1
Ws 1 Ww
5 5 Gsw(1 2 n)(1 1 w) (3.28)
V
W
Weight V
Volume
V 5n
W 5 Gs (1 2 n)
V51
Ws 5 Gs (1 2 n) Vs 5 1 2 n
Air W
Water Solid
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203
3.4 Relationships among Unit Weight, Porosity, and Moisture Content 73
W
Weight V
Volume
W 5 n
V 5V 5n
V51
Ws 5 Gs (1 2 n) Vs 5 1 2 n
W
Water Solid
Figure 3.6 shows a soil sample that is saturated and has V 5 1. According to this figure,
Ws 1 Ww (1 2 n)Gsw 1 nw
sat 5 5 5 [(1 2 n)Gs 1 n]w (3.29)
V 1
Ww nw n
wsat 5 5 5 (3.30)
Ws (1 2 n)wGs (1 2 n)Gs
Example 3.1
For a saturated soil, show that
11 1 w G 2G
1 1 wsat
sat 5 s w
sat s
Solution
W Ww 1 Ws wsatWs 1 Ws Ws
sat 5 5 5 5 (1 1 wsat) (a)
V V V V
Ws 5 GsVsw (b)
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203
74 Chapter 3 | Weight–Volume Relationships
Vv 1 Vs V
e115 5 (c)
Vs Vs
Gsw
sat 5 (1 1 wsat) (d)
11e
e 5 wsatGs (e)
1 1 wsat
gsat 5 11 1 w G 2G gsat s
s w
Example 3.2
For a moist soil sample, the following are given.
Total volume: V 5 1.2 m3
Total mass: M 5 2350 kg
Moisture content: w 5 8.6%
Specific gravity of soil solids: Gs 5 2.71
Determine the following.
a. Moist density
b. Dry density
c. Void ratio
d. Porosity
e. Degree of saturation
f. Volume of water in the soil sample
Solution
Part a
From Eq. (3.13),
M 2350
5 5 5 1958.3 kg/
g/m
g/
/m3
V 1.2
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203
3.4 Relationships among Unit Weight, Porosity, and Moisture Content 75
Part b
From Eq. (3.14),
Ms M 2350
d 5 5 5 5 1803.3 kg/
g/m
g/
/m3
1 2
V (1 1 w)V 8.6
11 (1.2)
100
Part c
From Eq. (3.23),
Gs w
d 5
11e
Gsw (2.71)(1000)
e5 215 2 1 5 0.503
d 1803.3
Part d
From Eq. (3.7),
e 0.503
n5 5 5 0.335
1 1 e 1 1 0.503
Part e
From Eq. (3.19),
1100 2(2.71)
8.6
wGs
S5 5 5 0.463 5 46.3%
e 0.503
Part f
The volume of water is
1 2
2350
2350 2
M 8.6
M2 11
Mw M 2 Ms 11w 100
5 5 5 5 0.186 m3
w w w 1000
Alternate Solution
Refer to Figure 3.7.
Part a
M 2350
5 5 5 1958.3 kg/
g/m
g/
/m3
V 1.2
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203
76 Chapter 3 | Weight–Volume Relationships
V 5 0.402
M 5 186.1 V 5 0.186
M 5 2350 V 5 1.2
Ms 5 2163.9 Vs 5 0.798
Air W
Water Solid
Figure 3.7
Part b
M 2350
Ms 5 5 5 2163.9 kg
11w 8.6
11
100
Ms M 2350
d 5 5 5 5 1803.3 kg/
g/m
g/
/m3
1 2
V (1 1 w)V 8.6
11 (1.2)
100
Part c
Ms 2163.9
The volume of solids: 5 5 0.798 m3
Gs w (2.71)(1000)
Vv 0.402
Void ratio: e 5 5 5 0.503
Vs 0.798
Part d
Vv 0.402
Porosity: n 5 5 5 0.335
V 1.2
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203
3.4 Relationships among Unit Weight, Porosity, and Moisture Content 77
Part e
Vw
S5
Vv
Mw 186.1
Volume of water: Vw 5 5 5 0.186 m3
w 1000
Hence,
0.186
S5 5 0.463 5 46.3%
0.402
Part f
From Part e,
Vw 5 0.186 m3
Example 3.3
The following data are given for a soil:
Porosity: n 5 0.4
Specific gravity of the soil solids: Gs 5 2.68
Moisture content: w 5 12%
Determine the mass of water to be added to 10 m3 of soil for full saturation.
Solution
Equation (3.28) can be rewritten in terms of density as
5 Gsw (1 2 n)(1 1 w)
Similarly, from Eq. (3.29)
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203
78 Chapter 3 | Weight–Volume Relationships
Example 3.4
A saturated soil has a dry unit weight of 103 lb/ft3. Its moisture content is 23%.
Determine:
a. Saturated unit weight, sat
b. Specific gravity, Gs
c. Void ratio, e
Solution
Part a: Saturated Unit Weight
From Eq. (3.12),
1 2
23
sat 5 d(1 1 w) 5 (103) 1 1 5 126.69 lb/ft3 < 126.7 lb/ft3
100
Gsw
d 5
11e
Gsw
d 5
1 1 wGs
So,
Gs(62.4)
103 5
1 1 (0.23)(Gs)
or
Copyright 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. WCN 02-200-203
Important Note
Do NOT memorise the equations.
23
•Remarks
• The range of values of Dr may vary from a minimum of zero for
very LOOSE soil to a maximum of 100% for a very DENSE soil.
20
*Phases of soils-01: Convert from metric units to SI and US units.
(Revision: Oct.-08)
A cohesive soil sample was taken from an SPT and returned to the laboratory in a glass jar. It was
found to weigh 140.5 grams. The sample was then placed in a container of V = 500 cm3 and 423
cm3 of water were added to fill the container. From these data, what was the unit weight of the soil
in kN/m3 and pcf?
Solution.
Notice that the 140.5 grams is a mass. Therefore, the ratio of mass to volume is a density ρ,
m 140.5 g f gf
ρ= = = 1.82
V (500 − 423) cm 3 cm 3
3
⎛ g ⎞ ⎛ 1 kg f ⎞ ⎛ m ⎞ ⎛ 1 kN ⎞ ⎛ 1 0 2 cm ⎞ kN
γ = ρ g = ⎜ 1.82 f 3 ⎜
⎟⎜ 3 ⎟ ⎜ 9.806 ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ = 17.9 3 ( SI un its )
⎠ ⎝ 10 g f ⎟⎠ ⎝
2 3
⎝ cm sec ⎠ ⎝ 10 N ⎠ ⎝ 1 m ⎠ m
21
*Phases of soils–02: Compaction checked via the voids ratio.
(Revision: Sept.- 08)
A contractor has compacted the base course for a new road and found that the mean value of the
test samples shows w = 14.6%, GS = 2.81, and γ = 18.2 kN/m3. The specifications require that e ≤
0.80. Has the contractor complied with the specifications?
Solution:
GS γ W (1 + w ) G γ (1 + w )
γ = ∴ 1+ e = S W
1+ e γ
⎛ kN ⎞
2.81 ⎜ 9.81 3 ⎟ (1 + 0.146 )
⎝ m ⎠
1+ e = = 1.74
kN
18.2 3
m
e = 1.74 − 1 = 0.74
22
*Phases of soils–03: Value of the moisture when fully saturated.
(Revision: Oct.-08)
Solution:
(1) In a fully saturated soil the relation, Se = wGS becomes simply e = wGs
e n
because S = 1 or GS = =
wsat wsat (1 − n )
but γ sat = γ w ⎡⎣(1 − n ) GS + n ⎤⎦
γ sat ⎡ n ⎤ n
rearranging = ⎡⎣(1 − n ) GS + n ⎤⎦ = ⎢(1 − n ) + n⎥ = +n
γw ⎣ wsat (1 − n) ⎦ wsat
γ sat n nγ w
or −n = therefore wsat =
γw wsat γ sat − nγ w
e VV γ w VV γ w VS γ wVV
(2) Again, in a fully saturated soil, wsat = = = =
GS VS γ S VS 1 WS WS
γ wVV ⎛V ⎞ ⎛ VV + VS − VS ⎞ ⎛ VV + VS VS ⎞
∴ wsat = = γw ⎜ V ⎟ = γw ⎜ ⎟ = γw ⎜ − ⎟
WS ⎝ WS ⎠ ⎝ WS ⎠ ⎝ WS WS ⎠
⎛ 1 1⎞
or wsat = γ w ⎜ − ⎟
⎝ γd γS ⎠
23
*Phases of soils–04: Finding the wrong data.
(Revision: Oct.-08)
A geotechnical laboratory reported these results of five samples taken from a single boring.
Determine which are not correctly reported, if any.
Sample #1: w = 30%, γd = 14.9 kN/m3, γs = 27 kN/m3; clay.
Sample #2: w = 20%, γd = 18 kN/m3, γs = 27 kN/m3; silt.
Sample #3: w = 10%, γd = 16 kN/m3, γs = 26 kN/m3; sand.
Sample #4: w = 22%, γd = 17.3 kN/m3, γs = 28 kN/m3; silt.
Sample #5: w = 22%, γd = 18 kN/m3, γs = 27 kN/m3; silt.
Solution:
e VV γ w VV γ w VS γ wVV ⎛V ⎞ ⎛ V + VS − VS ⎞
wsat = = = = = γw ⎜ V ⎟ = γw ⎜ V ⎟
GS VS γ S VS 1 WS WS ⎝ WS ⎠ ⎝ WS ⎠
⎛ V + VS VS ⎞ ⎛ 1 1 ⎞
wsat = γw ⎜ V − ⎟ = γw ⎜ − ⎟
⎝ WS WS ⎠ ⎝ γd γS ⎠
The water content is in error if it is greater than the saturated moisture, that is,
⎛ 1 1 ⎞
∴ w ≤ wSAT = γ w ⎜ − ⎟
⎝γd γS ⎠
⎛ 1 1 ⎞
1) wSAT = ( 9.81 kN / m3 ) ⎜ − ⎟ = 30% = w = 30% GOOD
⎝ 14.9 27 ⎠
⎛1 1 ⎞
2) wSAT = ( 9.81 kN / m3 ) ⎜ − ⎟ = 18.5% v < w = 20% WRONG
⎝ 18 27 ⎠
⎛ 1 1 ⎞
3) wSAT = ( 9.81 kN / m3 ) ⎜ − ⎟ = 24% > w = 10% GOOD
⎝ 16 26 ⎠
⎛ 1 1 ⎞
4) wSAT = ( 9.81 kN / m3 ) ⎜ − ⎟ = 22.1% > w = 22% GOOD
⎝ 17.3 28 ⎠
⎛1 1 ⎞
5) wSAT = ( 9.81 kN / m3 ) ⎜ − ⎟ = 18.5% < w = 22% WRONG
⎝ 18 27 ⎠
24
*Phases of soils–05: Increasing the saturation of a soil.
(Revision: Sept.-08)
A soil sample has a unit weight of 105.7 pcf and a saturation of 50%. When its saturation is
increased to 75%, its unit weight raises to 112.7 pcf.
Determine the voids ratio e and the specific gravity Gs of this soil.
Solution:
γ W ( GS + Se )
γ =
1+ e
62.4(GS + 0.50e)
∴ 105.7 pcf = (1)
1+ e
62.4(GS + 0.75e)
and 112.7 pcf = (2)
1+ e
Gs =
(105.7 )(1 + e ) − 0.50e
62.4
25
*Phases of soils–06: Find γd, n, S and Ww.
(Revision: Sept.-08)
The moist unit weight of a soil is 16.5 kN/m3. Given that the w = 15% and Gs = 2.70, find:
(1) Dry unit weight γd,
(2) The porosity n,
(3) The degree of saturation S, and
(4) The mass of water in kgm/m3 that must be added to reach full saturation.
Solution:
γ 16.5 kN
a) γ d = = = 14.3
(1 + w) (1 + 0.15) m3
b) From the table of useful relationships,
γd =
Gs γ w Gγ
∴ 1+ e = s w =
( 2.70 )( 9.81) = 1.85 ∴ e = 0.85
1+ e γd (14.3)
e 0.85
n= = (100% ) = 46%
1 + e 1 + 0.85
26
*Phases of soils–07: Use the block diagram to find the degree of saturation.
(Revision: Sept.-08)
A soil has an “in-situ” (in-place) voids ratio eo = 1.87, wN = 60%, and GS = 2.75 . What are the
γmoist and S? (Note: All soils are really “moist” except when dry, that is when w = 0%).
Solution: Set VS = 1 m3 (Note: this problem could also be solved by setting V = 1.0 m3).
VV 1.87
∴ eo = = = 1.87 ∴ V = VS + VV = 1 + 1.87 = 2.87 m 3
VS 1
Ww
The "natural" water content is wN = = 0.60 ∴ Ww = 0.60Ws
Ws
Ws
γs Vs
Gs = = ∴ Ws = Vs ( GS γ w ) = (1 m 3 ) ( 2.75 ) ( 9.81 kN / m 3 ) = 26.98 kN
γw γw
Ww = 0.60 (Ws ) = ( 0.60 )( 26.98 ) = 16.19 kN
W = Ws + Ww = 26.98 + 16.19 = 43.17 kN
W 43.17 kN kN
∴ γ moist == 3
= 15.0 3
V 2.87 m m
Ww ⎛ 16.19 ⎞
V γ ⎜ ⎟
S= w = w =⎝
9.81 ⎠
∴ = 88.2%
VV VV 1.87
27
*Phases of soils–08: Same as Prob-07 but setting the total volume V=1 m3.
(Revision: Oct.-08)
A soil has an “in-situ” (in-place) voids ratio eo = 1.87, wN = 60%, and GS = 2.75 . What are the
γmoist and S? (Note: All soils are really “moist” except when dry, that is when w = 0%).
28
*Phases of soils–11: Find the weight of water needed for saturation.
(Revision: Sept.-08)
Determine the weight of water (in kN) that must be added to a cubic meter of soil to attain a 95 %
degree of saturation, if the dry unit weight is 17.5 kN/m3, its moisture is 4%, the specific gravity of
solids is 2.65 and the soil is entirely made up of a clean quartz sand.
Solution:
kN γ γ kN
γ d = 1 7 .5= = ∴ γ = 1 8 .2
m 3
1+ w 1 + 0 .0 4 m3
W = 1 8 .2 = W S + W w = W S + w W S = (1 .0 4 ) W S
∴ W S = 1 7 .5 k N , and W w = 0 .7 0 k N
WS 1 7 .5 k N 1 7 .5 k N
VS = = = = 0 .6 7 3 m 3
γ S G Sγ w (2 .6 5 ) (9 .8 1 k N / m 3 )
Ww 0 .7 0 k N
Vw = = = 0 .0 7 m 3
∴ V a = V − V s − V w = 0 .2 5 7 m 3
γ w ( 9 .8 1 k N / m 3 )
VV 0 .0 7 + 0 . 2 5 7
e = = = 0 .4 9
VS 0 .6 7 3
wGS ( 0 .0 4 ) ( 2 .6 5 )
T h e e x is tin g S = = (1 0 0 ) = 2 1 .6 %
e 0 .4 9
W e re q u ire a S = 9 5 % , th e re fo re ,
w =
Se
=
( 0 .9 5 ) ( 0 .4 9 ) = 0 .1 7
GS 2 .6 5
W w = w W S = ( 0 .1 7 ) (1 7 .5 k N ) = 2 .9 8 k N
a lr e a d y h a v e W w = 0 .7 0 k N
∴ m u s t a d d w a te r = 2 .2 8 k N
31
*Phases of soils–12: Identify the wrong piece of data.
(Revision: Sept.-08)
A project engineer receives a laboratory report with tests performed on marine marl calcareous
silt). The engineer suspects that one of the measurements is in error. Are the engineer’s suspicions
correct? If so, which one of these values is wrong, and what should be its correct value?
kN
G iven γ = unit w eight of sam ple = 18.4
m3
kN
γ S = unit w eight of solids = 26.1
m3
w = w ater content = 40%
e = voids ratio = 1.12
S = degree of saturation = 95%
Solution:
32
9. Soil Density and Unit Weight
9.1. DENSITY AND MOISTURE CONTENT
9.1.1. Heavy Is the Soil
Soil density and unit weight are basic to many soil and foundation problems, as the weight of soil involved can eclipse that of
other materials used to build structures. For example, the weight of soil removed for a basement usually exceeds the weight of
the house that will stand in its place. This does not ensure that the house will be safe from settlement because its weight is not
evenly distributed, but is mainly carried by the foundations.
The most critical component of a foundation is not concrete, which obviously is much stronger than the soil on which it rests.
Nor does the weight of the building simply derive support from the soil underneath the foundation, as foundations often are
extended to a width that enables the soil alongside to keep the soil underneath from squeezing out. Fig. 9.1 illustrates what can
happen if the soil alongside is removed. Support for foundations therefore is not simply a matter of soil strength but also
involves a calculated balance that takes into account both the weight and strength of the soil. In Fig. 9.1 a basement was
excavated next to the foundation for a municipal fire station with predictable consequences.
Soil weight also contributes the “body forces” that are the driving forces for landslides, and exert pressures on buried pipes and
tunnels. Lateral bulging of soil under its own weight is opposed by support from retaining walls.
Soil weight also can have a positive influence because it contributes to friction that helps torestrain a landslide and support a
building foundation. Soil weight therefore can appear on both sides of the equation.
Figure 9.1 Collapse of a wall of a municipal fire station was triggered by removing the restraining
effect of weight of the soil from alongside the foundation. Photo is courtesy of Prof. J. M. Hoover.
© McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use, Privacy Notice and copyright information.
moisture is based on 75 g, not on the total weight of 100 g. The moisture content, instead of being 25 percent, is 100 × (100 −
75)/75 = 33 percent.
This convention can yield some rather curious results: For example, if a soil sample weighs 100 g wet and 50 g dry, its moisture
content is 100 × (100 − 50)/ 50 = 100 percent. Some natural soils contain more water than solids, in which case the moisture
content is over 100 percent! For this one needs a college education.
The relation between moisture content and degree of saturation can be critical, because a load applied to and acting to
compress a saturated soil will be partly carried by the pore water, which has zero strength. The soil that is firm enough to
support a heavy truck when dry can turn into a mudhole when the soil becomes saturated with water.
Figure 9.2 The largest man-made structures are not earth dams or the Pyramids, but highways built
on engineered and compacted soil. U.S. Interstate Highway system. Adapted from the U.S. Federal
Highway Administration.
Density and moisture content measurements are routinely conducted in all but the smallest compaction projects in order to
ensure adherence to specifications. Modern instruments allow this to be done indirectly and quickly using non-destructive
gamma-ray transmission and neutron tests that are discussed in Chapter 13. This chapter discusses the procedures used to
calculate density relationships in a soil.
Figure 9.3 A block diagram simplifies calculations of moisture content and density relationships by
filling in the blanks according to the formula shown at the top. The dashed line indicates variability
of water and air contents as the total volume of voids, V v, remains constant.
Newton’s formula f = ma. On Earth the acceleration usually is denoted by g and nominally is 9.81 m/s 2 or 32.2 ft/s 2 .
Gravitational acceleration varies with altitude and location relative to mountain ranges and ocean basins, but the amount of the
variation on Earth does not significantly influence the determination of unit weights. In dealing with weights on Earth, unit
weight is the term preferred in engineering.
The wet unit weight and moisture content are measured and then converted to dry unit weight, which reflects only the degree of
packing of a soil.
Example 9.1
A cylindrical sample of undisturbed soil 3 in. (76.2 mm) in diameter and 6 in. (152.4 mm) long weighs 3.04 lb (1.38 kg mass)
and 2.57 lb (1.166 kg mass) after oven-drying. What are (a) its wet and dry unit weights and (b) its densities?
Answer: (a) The volume of the cylindrical sample is 42.4 in.3 , or 0.0245 ft 3 . The wet unit weight is 3.04 ÷ 0.0245 = 124 lb/ft 3 .
The dry unit weight is 2.57 ÷ 0.0245 = 105 lb/ft 3 .
(b) The volume is 695 cm 3 . The wet density is 1.99 g/cm 3 and the dry density is 1.68 g/cm 3 . In SI these values are expressed
as Mg/m 3 , also called “bulk densities,” the bulk density of water being 1.00.
Example 9.2
Answer: The wet and dry weights are 13.52 N and 11.43 N respectively. The sample volume is 695(10)−6 m 3 . The respective
unit weights are 19.5 and 16.4 kN/m 3 .
(9.1)
where e is the void ratio, V v the volume of voids, and V s the volume of voids. This is one of only a few formulas in geotechnical
engineering that should be committed to memory.
(9.2)
where w is the moisture content in percent, W w is the weight of water, and W s is the weight of the solids.
Example 9.3
Answer: First subtract the dry weight from the wet weight to obtain the weight of water: 3.04 − 2.57 = 0.47 lb. Thenw = 100 ×
(0.47/2.57) = 18.3%. A similar calculation can be made using grams weight or Newtons.
(9.3)
(9.4)
(9.5)
© McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use, Privacy Notice and copyright information.
(9.6)
(9.7)
In other words, the dry unit weight of a soil is equal to its wet unit weight divided by 1 plus the moisture content expressed as a
decimal fraction. This formula is used so often that it should be practiced and committed to memory.
Example 9.4
Use eq. (9.7) to convert the wet unit weight in Example 9.1 to a dry unit weight.
Answer:
The same formula, which is so astounding for its simplicity, also may be used to convert wet to dry density: 1.99/(1 + 0.183) =
1.68 Mg/m 3 , or unit weights in SI: 19.5/1.183 = 16.5 kN/m 3 .
Example 9.5
Calculate the saturated unit weight for Example 9.1 assuming that the specific gravity of the mineral portion equals 2.70.
Answer: The simplest procedure is to write known quantities into a block diagram and go from there. The known quantities are
written as shown in Fig. 9.4. The wet unit weight or weight per unit volume, 124 lb, was measured, and the dry unit weight, or
weight of the solids per unit volume, 105 lb, was calculated. The difference is the weight of the water, 19 lb. The respective unit
weights for the solids and for the water are entered into the appropriate boxes. From the formula at the top, V s = 105/(3.70)
(62.4) = 0.62, which may be written on the diagram. As the total volume is 1.0, the volume of voids is V v = 1.0 − 0.62 = 0.38. If
that volume is filled with water, its weight will be W w = 0.38 × 62.4 = 23.5 lb, and the saturated unit weight will beW sat = 105 +
23.5 = 128 lb/ft 3 .
© McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use, Privacy Notice and copyright information.
Figure 9.4 A block diagram makes calculations easy and most density formulas superfluous: fill in
the known values and calculate the unknowns.
Answer: The calculated values for V s = 0.62 and V v = 0.38 should be written at the left on the block diagram. Then e = 0.38/0.62 = 0.61.
(9.8)
Example 9.6
Note that in order to calculate a submerged unit weight the saturated unit weight must be calculated first, unless for some
indefensible reason a soil that is submerged is assumed to be unsaturated.
“Sudden drawdown” is when a submerged soil is left high and wet, as during receding flood levels. This converts a submerged
unit weight to a saturated unit weight, which approximately doubles the effective weight of the soil. Collapse of river banks
therefore occurs during waning stages of a flood and not during the flood. The same situation can occur in a lake if the level is
rapidly lowered, which is an important consideration in reservoir management as a sudden drawdown can create sudden
landslides.
The wet unit weight and moisture content of a soil are measured.
© McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use, Privacy Notice and copyright information.
Dry unit weight is calculated using eq. (9.7).
A mineral specific gravity is assumed or measured and its unit weight calculated.
The volume of solids is calculated from the dry unit weight and mineral unit weight.
To predict the saturated unit weight, assume that all voids are filled with water and calculate its weight from the volume and
unit weight of water, then add this weight to the dry unit weight to obtain a saturated unit weight.
A block diagram can be used equally effectively with the cgs or SI systems of measurement with the unit weight of water equal
to 1.0 g/cm 3 or 1 Mg/m 3 , or 9.807 kN/m 3 , respectively. Specific gravity values are dimensionless and the same in any
system.
(9.9)
(9.10)
Degree of saturation is defined as the volume of water divided by the volume of voids, in percent:
(9.11)
A formula that may be used to determine saturated unit weight from the void ratio, specific gravity, and wet unit weight is as
follows:
(9.12)
© McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use, Privacy Notice and copyright information.
Some values of specific gravities are shown inTable 9.1. The specific gravity of volcanic ash, which is mostly glass, is low
because glass has no regular crystal structure with requisite packing of atoms. That of the Oxisol is high because of its iron
content.
Kaolinite 2.61
For comparison, the unit weight of Portland cement concrete, which contains water, is approximately 2.4 Mg/m3 , 150 lb/ft 3 , or
23.6 kN/m 3 . Heavier concretes used for radiological containment vessels or to contain gas pressures in deep oil wells require
denser aggregates.
A theoretical lower bound with all particles touching can be obtained by assuming uniform spheres packed in a cubic
arrangement (Fig. 9.5).
The void ratio of the cubic arrangement can be obtained from the volume of a sphere and the volume of the enclosed cube. IfV
= 1, V s = 0.5236, and
Multiplying V s times the mineral unit weight gives the dry unit weight, which with quartz spheres is
Coincidentally silt soils that have a lower unit weight than about 90 lb/ft 3 (1.44 Mg/m 3 ; 14.1 kN/m 3 ) generally are collapsible.
A rhombic arrangement is obtained by sliding one layer of spheres over interstices between the next lower layer of spheres, and
© McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use, Privacy Notice and copyright information.
is the densest packing arrangement for uniform spheres. This also is the pattern of a tetrahedral arrangement around the void,
as each sphere is supported by and in contact with three spheres in the next lower layer. This arrangement gives a volume of
solids V s = 0.75, and a void ratio of
This is a high unit weight for a soil and will be decreased if there are voids where particles are not in contact. The density will be
even higher as spaces are filled with progressively smaller particles, approaching that of Portland cement concrete.
Figure 9.5 Packing arrangements for uniform spheres. Similar arrangements occur in crystals.
The average density from the cubic and rhombic packing arrangements is
Example 9.7
Calculate the saturated and submerged unit weights for the cubic packing arrangement.
Answer: Subtracting the volume of solids from 1.0 givesV v = 0.4764. The weight of water to fill all voids is 0.476 Mg/m3 , or
0.476 × 62.4 = 29.7 lb/ft 3 , or 0.476 × 9.807 = 4.67 kN/m 3 . This is added to the dry density to give γ sat = 29.7 + 86.6 = 116.3
lb/ft 3 (8.3 kN/m 3 ). Then
These several categories of water, therefore, do not all boil off at 100°C, so a standardized drying temperature is used to
determine moisture content. That temperature is 110 ± 5°C (ASTM Designation D-2216). To determine moisture contents,
samples of soils are weighed, dried overnight in an oven held at 105°C, removed, and allowed to cool in a desiccator, which is a
sealed vessel containing calcium chloride, CaCl 3 , as a desiccant. After cooling, the samples are removed and re-weighed.
Controlled cooling is required or the soil clay can re-adsorb water from the atmosphere.
Nuclear instruments used to measure moisture contents in the field actually measure hydrogen atoms regardless of whether
they are in water or are part of the clay mineral structure or the content of organic matter, and require calibrations to oven
© McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use, Privacy Notice and copyright information.
determinations for each soil type. The use of nuclear instruments and other means for measuring soil densities in the field is
discussed in Chapter 13 on soil compaction.
Example 9.8
A soil sample plus an aluminum dish weighs 195 g before oven-drying and 136 g afterwards. The dish weighs 15 g. (Most small
laboratory balances weigh in grams.) What is the moisture content?
Answer: The difference in weight is the weight of the water: 196 − 136 = 59 g. The weight of the dish, or tare weight, must be
subtracted to obtain the dry weight of the soil: 136 − 15 = 121 g. The moisture content is w = 100 × 59/121 = 49%.
Example 9.9
A cylindrical soil sample 75 mm in diameter by 100 mm long weighs 690 g. After oven-drying it weighs 580 g. The specific
gravity of the solid particles is G = 2.70. What are the (a) moisture content, (b) wet unit weight, (c) dry unit weight, (d) void ratio,
(e) porosity, (f) saturated unit weight, (g) submerged unit weight?
Answer: The first step is to write known or given quantities in a block diagram as shown at the top inFig. 9.6. The next step is to
calculate and fill in the empty spaces as shown sequentially by the arrows starting at the lower right in the lower part of the
figure. That is:
The weight of water equals the difference between the wet and oven-dry weights, 690 − 580 = 110 g.
The volume of solids equals the weight of solids divided byG s = 580 ÷ 2.70 = 215 cm 3 .
The volume of water equals the weight of water divided byG w = 110 ÷ 1.0 = 110 cm 3 .
The volume of air equals the total volume minus the volumes of water and solids: 442 − 215 − 110 = 117 cm3 .
The volume of voids equals the volume of water plus the volume of air: 110 + 117 = 227 cm3 .
© McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use, Privacy Notice and copyright information.
After the block diagram is completed it is a simple matter to calculate the required quantities:
(f) For saturated unit weight the air voids are replaced by water that has a weight of 117 × 1.0 = 117. Then γsat = (690 +
117)/442 = 1.83 g/cm 3 or 113.9 lb/ft 3 .
(g) γsub = 1.83 − 1.0 = 0.83 g/m 3 , or 113.9 − 62.4 = 51.5 lb/ft 3 .
9.7.1.1. Problems
9.1. Convert the following wet densities and moisture contents to dry densities:
9.2. If 2.70, find the void ratio for each of the above.
9.3. Calculate the saturated and the submerged unit weights of each of the above.
9.4. An undisturbed sample of soil weighing 49.95 N (11.23 lb) is coated with paraffin and suspended by a string in water to give a submerged
weight of 24.42 N (5.49 lb). If the sample contains 13.4% moisture and has a true specific gravity of 2.65, calculate the following
properties: (a) wet density, (b) dry density, (c) void ratio, (d) porosity, (e) saturation, (f) percent water voids, (g) percent air voids, (h) percent
solids.
9.5. If 171,900 m 3 (224,800 yd 3) of soil are removed from a highway cut in which the void ratio is 1.22, how many cubic meters (yards) of fill
having a void ratio of 0.78 could be constructed?
9.6. If the true specific gravity of the soil in Problem 9.5 is 2.70 and it contains 10% moisture, how many meganewtons (tons) of soil will have
to be moved? How many meganewtons (tons) of dry soil will there be? How many meganewtons (tons) of water will there be in the soil?
9.7. (a) Explain how a moisture content can exceed 100%. (b) What soil minerals are indicated by moisture contents in excess of 100%? (c)
Why is it advantageous to define moisture content on the basis of dry weight rather than total weight?
9.8. A proposed earth dam will contain 4,098,000 m 3 (5,360,000 yd 3) of soil. It will be compacted to a void ratio of 0.80. There are three
available borrow pits, which are designated as A, B, and C. The void ratio of the soil in each pit and the estimated cost of moving the soil to
the dam is as shown in the tabulation.
What will be the least earth-moving cost, and which pit will it be most economical to use?
© McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use, Privacy Notice and copyright information.
Cost of moving
9.9. Prepare a bar graph with vertical bar heights representing dry and submerged unit weights of (a) uniform quartz spheres in rhombic
packing, (b) uniform quartz spheres in cubic packing, (c) solid quartz, (d) Portland cement concrete.
© McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use, Privacy Notice and copyright information.