Scribd
Upload
62 views1 page

QAT-Form-7-Interview-Simulation-Rubrics

The document is an evaluation form for interview simulations at Arellano University Senior High School. It assesses students on their appearance, communication, and ability to respond to questions, using a numerical rating scale from 1 to 3. The form includes criteria descriptions and space for evaluator and adviser endorsements.

Uploaded by

adrian luis
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
62 views1 page

QAT-Form-7-Interview-Simulation-Rubrics

The document is an evaluation form for interview simulations at Arellano University Senior High School. It assesses students on their appearance, communication, and ability to respond to questions, using a numerical rating scale from 1 to 3. The form includes criteria descriptions and space for evaluator and adviser endorsements.

Uploaded by

adrian luis
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

QAT Form 7

ARELLANO UNIVERSITY
Senior High School

INTERVIEW SIMULATION EVALUATION


Internal

Student Name: ______________________ Grade Level/Section: ___________


Track: _____________________________ Strand: ______________________
Evaluated by: _______________________ Date Accomplished: ____________

Put a checkmark () under the corresponding numerical rating that determines student’s readiness in an
interview.

Scale Range Description Credit Hours

3 2.50 – 3.00 Excellent 5


2 1.50 – 2.49 Meets Expectations 3
1 1.00 – 1.49 Needs Improvement 2

CRITERIA 3 2 1
1. Appearance ⃝ ⃝ ⃝
2. Communication ⃝ ⃝ ⃝
3. Responding to Questions ⃝ ⃝ ⃝

Rate: _________________
Description: ____________
Credit Hours: ___________

Appearance
▪ Needs Improvement – poor grooming; choice in clothing is inappropriate for the interview
▪ Meets Expectations – well groomed; choice in clothing is acceptable for the interview
▪ Excellent – overall appearance is very neat; choice in clothing is appropriate for any job interview

Communication
▪ Needs Improvement – speaking is unclear and message is difficult to understand
▪ Meets Expectations – showed interest throughout the interview with minimal mistakes in
sentence structure and grammar
▪ Excellent – very attentive, and can speak clearly; appropriate use of sentence structure and
grammar

Responding to Questions
▪ Needs Improvement – some questions are answered incorrectly
▪ Meets Expectations – answers are acceptable and accurate
▪ Excellent – thorough answers to questions

Evaluated by: Endorsed by:

_____________________________________ _______________________________
Work Immersion Teacher Class Adviser
( Signature over Printed Name )

Date Submitted: _____________________

You might also like