6
6
net/publication/374674477
CITATIONS READS
0 23
6 authors, including:
Shweta Dwivedy
SMBT DENTAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE, NASHIK
18 PUBLICATIONS 7 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Shweta Dwivedy on 13 October 2023.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1
Department of oral medicine and Radiology, SMBT IDSR, Nashik, Maharastra, India
2
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Suregery, SMBT IDSR, Nashik, Maharastra, India
3
Department of oral medicine and Radiology, MIDSR Dental college, Latur, Maharastra, India
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: [email protected]
Article History Abstract
Received: 06 June 2023 Aim: The study was done with the aim to check for the reliability of
Revised: 05 Sept 2023 morphometric parameters of frontal and maxillary sinuses along with
Accepted:11Sept 2023 pyriform aperture for sexual dimorphism on posteroanterior skull radiograph
in young adults. Material and method: 30 individuals with equal distribution
of females and males were selected considering inclusion and exclusion
criteria and PA skull view of same were analyzed for frontal sinus, maxillary
sinus and pyriform aperture parameters using Carestream Dental imaging
software 6.14.7 CS 3D. Statistics and Result: Statistical analysis establishes
frontal and maxillary sinus parameters in comparison to pyriform aperture
parameters as reliable tool for gender assessment.
- 156 -
Similarly, pyriform aperture has been established dimorphic section of bone by Krogmann and Iscan
in 1986 (4). Sexual dimorphic characteristics of pyriform aperture have been established in various
human races. The sexual dimorphism in the size of the pyriform aperture can be influenced by racial
issues, especially in populations where there is miscegenation.
So, the current study was conducted to comparatively evaluate the radiographic morphometric
characteristics of frontal sinus, maxillary sinus and pyriform aperture in western Maharashtra
population, which is one of its kind as literature search has not put forward any conducted
comparative study on these parameters for this population.
2. Materials And Methods
After obtaining institutional ethical clearance which is in accordance with Helsinki Declaration
present study was conducted in an institutional setup on western Maharashtra population. 30 random
samples were selected including 15 males and 15 females. Samples were selected keeping in
consideration inclusion criteria of age between 20 -45 years, considering the stable period between
growth and regressive geriatric changes. Also, it is an established fact that maxillary sinus continues
to pneumatize into the developing alveolar ridge as the permanent teeth erupt. At the age of 20, with
the completion of the eruption, the pneumatization of the sinus ends, and it continues after the
exfoliation of the teeth. (5) Hence, we excluded the patients with edentulous ridge at any age. Also,
sample with no history of traumatic episode, developmental faults or medical conditions involving
head and neck region were included. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject after
explaining the purpose and method of the study and confirming the age by aid of supportive official
document a proper case history was recorded on a prescribed format.
In the present study, Posterior anterior (PA) Skull view of patient was recorded in Kodak 9000 Digital
Panoramic and Cephalometric system at standard exposure parameters (80 kVp, 10 mA, and 13.9 s),
and under adequate radiation protection measures by single operator. PA view was used for analysis
as image of sinuses could be obtained unmagnified and reproducible for each patient without
operator’s error for adjusting patient at angle for paranasal sinus view (PNS). The position of patient’s
head was standardized according to manufacturer’s instructions. All radiographs were assessed so that
only high-quality and correctly positioned radiographs were included for the study. Carestream Dental
imaging software 6.14.7 CS 3D was used and the images were analysed through same.
Following metrics were assessed for: (Figure 1)
FRONTAL SINUS right and left frontal sinus was measured for
• Length – right (Rt length FS) and left side (Lf width FS) (largest dimension)
• Width – right (Rt width FS) and left side (Lf length FS) (largest dimension)
• Area – right (Rt area FS) and left side (Lf area FS) (Length X Width)
MAXILLARY SINUS right and left maxillary sinus was measured for
• Length – right (Rt length MXS) and left side (largest dimension)
• Width – right (Rt width MXS) and left side (largest dimension)
• Area (Length X Width) – right (Rt area MXS) and left side (Lf area MXS)
PYRIFORM APERTURE right and left pyriform aperture was measured for
• Length (largest dimension) (Length pYfa)
• Width (largest dimension) (width pYfa)
The reliability and reproducibility of these measurements were assessed twice by investigator within
one-month interval, where the data of first session was masked at the second session to avoid bias. By
this method, a general consensus was reached. The obtained measurements which showed no
statistically significant differences were considered for study
3. Results and Discussion
A The obtained metrics was compiled on a MS Office Excel Sheet (v 2019, Microsoft Redmond
Campus, Redmond, Washington, United States). Data was subjected to statistical analysis using
Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS v 26.0, IBM). All the measured parameters data was then
subjected to discriminative statistical analysis and analysed using unpaired t-test. Statistical analysis
was done by calculating the mean and standard deviation of all above mentioned parameters.
Table 1: Inter group comparison of values
Sex N Mean (mm) Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean T value p value of t test
M 15 34.93 8.565 2.211 1.857 .074#
Age(years)
F 15 29.53 7.318 1.889
M 15 26.427 5.6383 1.4558 .949 .350#
Rt width FS
F 15 24.120 7.5325 1.9449
M 15 24.1600 5.39442 1.39283 .694 .493#
Rt length FS
F 15 22.7600 5.65203 1.45935
M 15 660.30 247.437 63.888 1.021 .316#
Rt area FS
F 15 571.76 226.941 58.596
M 15 31.440 7.1234 1.8392 2.406 .023*
Lf width FS
F 15 25.933 5.2756 1.3622
M 15 27.287 7.5820 1.9577 1.521 .140#
Lf length FS
F 15 23.967 3.7445 .9668
M 15 891.7253 366.55532 94.64418 2.427 .022*
Lf area FS
F 15 631.0900 196.50437 50.73721
M 15 26.933 5.6558 1.4603 2.015 .054#
Rt width MXS
F 15 23.167 4.5201 1.1671
M 15 27.85 3.934 1.016 1.358 .185#
Rt length MXS
F 15 25.87 4.077 1.053
M 15 761.799 242.1429 62.5210 2.112 .044*
Rt area MXS
F 15 603.931 158.6642 40.9669
M 15 26.067 5.2139 1.3462 1.417 .167#
Lf width MXS
F 15 23.513 4.6383 1.1976
M 15 28.360 4.4912 1.1596 1.812 .081#
Lf length MXS
F 15 25.727 3.3904 .8754
M 15 752.2820 235.33631 60.76357 2.056 .049*
Lf area MXS
F 15 606.2733 142.46331 36.78387
M 15 43.513 4.4659 1.1531 .685 .499#
Length pYfa
F 15 42.380 4.5943 1.1862
M 15 28.527 2.5725 .6642 1.199 .241#
width pYfa
F 15 26.600 5.6672 1.4633
All the mentioned metric parameters were having higher mean values for males as compared to
female subjects but statistically significance difference between the groups (p<0.05) was present only
for, (Table 1).
• Left width of Frontal Sinus,
• Left area of Frontal sinus
• Right area Maxillary Sinus
• Left area Maxillary sinus
Human identification in forensics is through a series of methods, among them finger prints been most
widely adopted but in cases when soft tissue is preserved. However, when body is incinerated or is in
skeletal form, forensic dental and anthropologic analysis becomes the necessity for identification.
Radiographs of an individual may serve as a retrospective tool for identifying corpses that are deemed
unrecognizable. (6). Radiographs play an important role in human identification and establishing the
gender of deceased, which is known to be the first and foremost important step for human
5. Acknowledgement
We would like to extend our heartfelt gratitude to Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology SMBT
IDSR, Nashik, for helping us with resources to conduct the study. Also we are in debt by the help
provided by Dr. Dhiraj Kalra sir, Department of Public Health Dentistry, SMBT IDSR, Nashik for
statistical analysis for the study.
References:
1. Netharaa, A., Ramani, P., Sherlin, H. J., S, G., Ramasubramanian, A., Jayaraj, G., Don, K. R., & Santhanam,
A. (2020). Frontal and Maxillary Air Sinus in Age Determination and Gender Identification. Journal of
Research in Medical and Dental Sciences, 8(3), 104-109. https://doi.org/10.5455/jrmds.2020227
2. Belaldavar, C., Kotrashetti, V. S., Hallikerimath, S. R., & Kale, A. D. (2014). Assessment of frontal sinus
dimensions to determine sexual dimorphism among Indian adults. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 6,
25-30.
3. Urooge, A., & Patil, B. A. (2017). Sexual Dimorphism of Maxillary Sinus – A Morphometric Analysis using
Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(3), ZC67-ZC70.
4. Cantín, L. M., Suazo, G. I. C., Zavando, M. D. A., & Smith, R. L. (2008). Sexual dimorphism determination
by piriform aperture morphometric analysis in Brazilian human skulls. International Journal of Morphology,
27(2), 327-331.
5. Deshpande, A. A., Munde, A. D., Mishra, S. S., Kawsankar, K. D., Sawade, R. V., & Mandar, B. (2022).
Determination of sexual dimorphism of maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography in a rural
population of western Maharashtra – A retrospective, cross-sectional study. Journal of Family Medicine and
Primary Care, 11, 1257-1261. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1173_21
6. Silva, R. F., Pinto, R. N., Ferreira, G. M., & Daruge Júnior, E. (2008). Importance of frontal sinus
radiographs for human identification. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, 74, 798.
7. Asghar, A., et al. (2016). Morphometric Study of Nasal bone and Piriform Aperture. Journal of Clinical and
Diagnostic Research, 10(1), AC05-AC07.
8. Araújo, T. M. S. D., Silva, C. J. T. D., de Medeiros, L. K. N., Estrela, Y. C. A., Silva, N. A., Gomes, F. B.,
Assis, T. O., & Oliveira, A. S. B. (2018). Morphometric analysis of piriform aperture in human skulls.
International Journal of Morphology, 36(2), 483-487.
9. Moreddu, E., et al. (2013). Morphometric measurements and sexual dimorphism of the piriform aperture in
adults. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 35(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1116-2
10. Devi, G., Archana, R., & Johnson, W. M. S. (2018). MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF NASAL BONE AND
PIRIFORM APERTURE IN HUMAN DRY SKULL OF SOUTH INDIAN ORIGIN. International Journal
of Anatomy Research, 6(4.3), 5970-5973. https://doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2018.386
11. Karadkhelkar, V. P., & Kshirsagar, S. V. (2017). Sexual dimorphism of frontal sinus in north Karnataka
region. MedPulse – International Journal of Anatomy, 3(2), 38-42.
12. Kandel, S., Shrestha, R., Sharma, R., & Sah, S. K. (2020). Sexual Dimorphism of Maxillary Sinus: A
Morphometric Analysis using Computed Tomography. Journal of Lumbini Medical College, 8(2), 264-269.
https://doi.org/10.22502/jlmc.v8i2.382