WEEK 8 & 9 NOTES
WEEK 8 & 9 NOTES
2
- Mentoring
- Experienced or more senior person in (or out) the org and gives a junior person
special attention to create opportunities to assist during early stages of their
career
- Career functions
- Coaching, giving feedback (task-oriented mentoring)
- Developmental to do with career tasks
- Sponsor and create opportunities for them
- Exposure and visibility
- Psychosocial functions
- Helping develop a person’s self confidence, identity, CQ, EQ
- Formal Mentoring Programs
- Developmental Networks
- Taking interest in a young protege’s career
- Women and mentoring
- Decrease barriers of access for women
- Race, ethnicity, and mentoring
- Decrease barriers of access across ethnic and racial groups
- Proactive socialisation leads to...
- Better fit
- Build rapport
- Less attrition
- More cohesive workspace
- Proactive socialisation
- Feedback seeking
- Taking an active role to assess your performance
- Information seeking
- Figuring out how to better integrate into job, role, group
- General socialising
- Participating in social office events and attending social gatherings
- Relationship building
- Building relationships with others in your area, department, division
- Boss-relationship building
- Get to know your boss
- Networking
- Outside your organisation
- Job change negotiation
- Job crafting, increase your fit between you and the job
- Diagnosing a Culture
- Symbols: the use of symbols to reinforce cultural values
- Rituals: rites, rituals, and ceremonies can convey essence
- Stories: the folklore of organisations - stories about past organisational events - is
a common aspect of culture
- Recognizing Subcultures
- Smallure cultures that develop within a larger organisational culture that are
based on differences in training, occupation, or departmental goals
- Strong Culture Concept: intense and pervasive beliefs, values, and assumptions
- A strong culture provides great consensus concerning “what the org is about” or
what it stands for
- Widely shared philosophy
- A view that people are a critical resource (positive vs. negative)
- Most strong cultured orgs have charismatic leaders and/or heroes
- All strong cultured orgs have rituals and ceremonies
- Clear expectations about the direction of the org
- Weak: fragmented and have less impact on org members
- There may be a gap between the culture that leaders envisions and the
culture that employees experience
- Assets
- Coordination
- Facilitate communication and coordination
- Conflict resolution
- Sharing core values can resolve conflicts
- Financial success
- When the culture matches the goals of the org, the bottom line is
reinforced
- Better customer relations
- Liabilities
- Resistance to change
- Damage a firm’s ability to innovate
- Culture clash
- Strong cultures can mix badly when a merger or acquisition occurs
- Pathology
- When there are beliefs, values, and assumptions that support
infighting, secrecy, and dishonesty
- Seven socialisation steps
1. Selection
- Careful about who is chosen in the company
2. Hazing
- Difficult things on the front end, like rites of passage to reinforce
commitment
3. Training
- Training in the trenches (you are put straight into the action)
4. Reward & Promotion
5. Exposure to Core Culture
- Company values
6. Organisational Folklore
- Telling stories
7. Role Models
- Leaders, heroes, mentors
WEEK 9
What is leadership?
- The influence that particular individuals exert on the goal achievement of others in an
organizational context
Formal vs. Informal Leadership
- Formal
- Legitimacy
- Role/position
- Informal
- No legitimate title
- Positive power always
- Critical knowledge and experience
Transactional vs. Transformational
- Transactional (managerial)
- Motivate by exchanging rewards for services
- Contingent reward behaviour
- Management by exception
- Degree to which leaders take corrective action on the basis of results of
leader-follower transactions before behaviour creates serious problems
- Transformational (leadership)
- Arouse intense feelings
- Intellectual stimulation
- People are stimulated to think about problems, issues and strategies in
new ways
- Inspirational motivation
- Strong visions for the future based on values and ideals, stimulate
enthusiasm
- Rely on personal sources of power
- Individualised consideration
- Treating employees as distinct, concern for their needs and development
- Charisma
- Idealised influence
Universal vs. Contingent
- Universal Trait (Transformational Leaders)
- Trait theory of leadership
- Leadership depends on the personal qualities or traits of the leader
- Limitations
- Traits -> Leadership or Situation -> Leadership???
- Leadership Categorization Theory
- Prototypical leadership expectations
- Associated traits
- Intelligence
- Energy and Drive
- Self-confidence
- Dominance
- Motivation to lead
- Emotional Stability
- Honesty and integrity
- Need for achievement
- Sociability
- Universal Behaviour
- Initiating consideration/structure
- Consideration
- Extent to which leader is approachable and shows personal
concern
- A leader who is concerned about reducing tension, resolving
disagreements and maintaining morale
- Structure
- Degree to which a leader concentrates on goal attainment
- A leader who accomplishes tasks by organising, planning and
dividing labour
- Consequences
- Consideration more strongly related to follower satisfaction
- Structure is more strongly related to leader job performance and
group performance
- More dependent on the characteristics of the task, the employee
and setting where the work is performed
- Contingent Trait
- Fiedler’s contingency
- Association between leadership orientation and group effectiveness is
contingent on how favourable the situation is for exerting influence
1. Leadership Orientation: LPC leads to... (situational fav.)
- High
- Relationship-oriented
- Low
- Task-oriented
2. Situational Favourableness (most favourable when there is...)
- Leader-member relationship
- Task structure
- Position of power (in leader)
- Contingent Behaviour
- Vroom-Jago (Participative Leadership)
- Specifies when leaders should use participation and to what extent they
should use it
- Suggests various degrees of participation that a leader can exhibit
- Range: AI, AII, CI, CII, GII (A: autocratic, C: consultative, G: group)
- AI: you solve the problem or make the decision yourself, using
information available to you at the time
- AII: you obtain the necessary information from your employees then
decide the solutionYou obtain the necessary information from your
employees then decide the solution to the problem yourself. You may or
may not tell your employees what the problem is when getting the
information from them. The role played by your employees in making the
decision is clearly one of providing the necessary information to you,
rather than generating or evaluating alternative solutions.
- CI: You share the problem with the relevant employees individually,
getting their ideas and suggestions without bringing them together as a
group. Then you make the decision, which may or may not reflect your
employees’ influence.
- CII: You share the problem with your employees as a group, obtaining
their collective ideas and suggestions. Then you make the decision, which
may or may not reflect your employees’ influence.
- GII. You share the problem with your employees as a group. Together you
generate and evaluate alternatives and attempt to reach agreement
(consensus) on a solution. Your role is much like that of a chairperson.
You do not try to influence the group to adopt “your” solution, and you are
willing to accept and implement any solution that has the support of the
entire group.
- House’s Path-Goal Theory
- The situations under which various leader behaviours are most effective
1. Leadership behaviour
a. Directive
- Let employees know what is expected of them,
performance, schedule, etc.
b. Supportive
- Friendly, approachable, and concerned with interpersonal
relationships
c. Participative
- Consult with employees about work-related matters
d. Achievement-oriented
- Encourage and remain confident that employees will exert
high effort and strive for high-level goal accomplishment
2. Situational Factors
a. Employee characteristics
- nAch employees work well under achievement-oriented
leadership
- Employees who prefer being told prefer directive
- But when they are capable of performing the task
they will view this behaviour as unnecessary
b. Environmental factors
- When tasks are clear and routine: directive not useful
- When tasks are challenging but ambiguous: directive and
participative useful
- When job is frustrating: supportive leadership preferred
3. Path-Goal Model
- An effective leader forms a connection between employee goals
and organisational goals
- Participative Leadership
- Involving employees in making work-related decisions
- Advantages:
- Motivation
- Quality decisions
- Acceptance of decisions
- Problems:
- Time and energy
- Loss of power
- Lack of receptivity or knowledge (employees may not be receptive to
participation)
Positive Leadership: Leadership that focuses on leader behaviours and interpersonal dynamics
that increase followers’ confidence and result in positive outcomes beyond task compliance
L1 + L2 + GM + S
L1 = leadership traits
- Physical attributes
- 5+7
- IQ, EQ, CQ
- nAch
- Motivation to lead
- Honesty & integrity
- Dominance
- Self-confidence
L2 = leadership behaviours
- Structure (task-oriented)
- Direction setting
- High performance standards
- Hands-on guidance
- Frequent feedback
- Adapts to the situation
- Strong customer orientation
- Stability of performance
- Consideration (relationship-oriented)
- Makes work meaningful, provides emotional support, promotes principles and
values, demonstrates servant leadership
GM = group member characteristics
- 5+7
- IQ, EQ, CQ
- nAch
- Motivation to work
- Dominance
- Self-confidence
S = situation
- Internal
- Power, politics, culture, subcultures
- How clear and routine tasks are
- How challenging tasks are
- Whether jobs are seen as frustrating or dissatisfying
- External
- Economic, competitors, customers, suppliers, industry associations,
social, political, technological