Mini Project Review 1
Mini Project Review 1
GUIDE:SOWMYA T
DESIGNATATION: ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
PROS OF METHODOLOGY:
Higher prediction accuracy. CONS & LIMITATIONS:
Supports better decision-making for reducing food waste. Limited data quality.
Adaptable to various food domains. Model interpretability issues.
High computational cost.
YEAR PUBLISHED: 2024 JOURNAL: MDPI, Biomass, Volume 4, Article 24, 2024
PROBLEM STATEMENT: TECHNIQUES USED:
Food waste is a global issue with implications for food Bibliometric analysis of 1022 documents.
security and sustainability. The study examines the role of Performance analysis to assess publications, citations, and
the circular economy in reducing food waste. research impact.
Scientific mapping to identify research themes and
collaboration.
PROS OF METHODOLOGY:
Identified key themes like bioenergy, resource CONS & LIMITATIONS:
recovery, and sustainability. Focused on Scopus data, excluding non-English and non-
Highlighted top authors, journals, and countries. journal publications.
Showcased growing interest in food waste Overemphasis on highly cited works, missing emerging
valorization. research.
DATASET USED: RESULTS OBTAINED:
1022 documents from Scopus, published between 2014 and Significant rise in publications over the last decade, with focus
2023. areas shifting to sustainability and waste valorization.
PAPER SUMMARY
SMART URBAN FOOD RE-DISTRIBUTION USING WEB HARNESSING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR URBAN
APPLICATION FOOD REDISTRIBUTION: A SOCIO-TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
OF THE FEEDING AMERICA INITIATIVE
SUFD Platform: The Smart Urban Food Distribution (SUFD)
platform addresses urban food redistribution using
advanced technologies. AI Technologies: Deep learning, self-driving vehicles, real-
AI-Driven Predictive Modeling: AI models predict food time data analytics.
supply and demand, optimizing redistribution efforts. Food Redistribution System: Surplus food collected from
Real-Time Data Analytics: The system uses real-time data to restaurants/stores, distributed via vending hubs to
enhance decision-making and ensure timely food delivery. vulnerable communities.
Last-Mile Delivery: Incorporates drones and driverless cars Optimization: AI-driven logistics to reduce food waste and
for efficient last-mile food delivery. enhance access for homeless populations.
Centralized Platform: Connects donors, recipients, and Business Incentives: Tax benefits and corporate social
volunteers, streamlining food distribution and reducing responsibility for participating businesses.
waste. Impact: Social (improved food access), environmental
Key Features: Includes inventory management, route (waste reduction), economic (business incentives).
optimization, and stakeholder collaboration to improve Challenges: Implementation hurdles, regulatory
supply chain resilience. compliance, AI accuracy.
Goals: Aims to enhance food security, reduce food waste,
and minimize environmental impact.
PAPER SUMMARY
REDUCING FOOD WASTE USING MACHINE LEARNING IMPROVING FOOD DISTRIBUTION IN URBAN AREAS WITH
MODELS: FORECASTING AND OPTIMIZATION APPROACHES IOT AND ML
ML for Food Waste Reduction: Explores how machine learning (ML) can
help tackle food waste through advanced demand forecasting and IoT and ML Integration: Explores how combining IoT and ML can
optimization. transform urban food distribution systems.
Improved Inventory Management: ML analyzes large datasets to Real-Time Monitoring: IoT sensors track food conditions
predict food demand more accurately, improving inventory continuously, ensuring quality control and minimizing waste.
management and reducing waste. Demand Forecasting & Optimization: ML algorithms are used for
ML Techniques: demand forecasting, route optimization, and inventory management,
1. Supervised Learning: For predicting food demand and managing improving operational efficiency.
supply chains. Blockchain for Traceability: Highlights the role of blockchain in
2. Unsupervised Learning: For identifying patterns in food consumption ensuring food traceability and enhancing transparency in the supply
and waste. chain.
3. Reinforcement Learning: For optimizing supply chains and reducing Collaboration: Stresses the need for collaboration among
perishable food waste. stakeholders (donors, distributors, consumers) for an efficient food
4. Real-World Examples: Case studies from companies like Walmart and distribution system.
IBM Food Trust show the practical effectiveness of ML in reducing food Challenges: Addresses issues such as data privacy concerns and
waste. challenges in technology integration.
Challenges: Issues like data quality, integration costs, and ethical Conclusion: IoT and ML are essential for building a more efficient,
considerations are obstacles to wider adoption. sustainable, and customer-focused food distribution system in urban
Conclusion: ML holds transformative potential to reduce food waste areas.
and promote sustainable food systems.
FINAL PAPER SUMMARY
2. Empirical Model: The authors use data from a Colorado food bank to develop a model that simulates and optimizes food
recovery and redistribution processes.
3. Food Supply Distribution: The model shows that the food supply follows a heavy-tailed distribution, meaning a small
number of donors provide a large portion of the available food.
4. Feasibility of Food Rescue: Food rescue is achievable if the food is swiftly transported and preserved before expiration.
5. Key Factors: The number of donors and efficient transportation systems are crucial to reducing costs and ensuring
sufficient food is rescued to meet demand.
6. Scalability: With enough resources, the approach can be scaled, making it a viable solution for reducing food waste while
addressing food insecurity.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
This project aims to develop a machine learning model to forecast food donation volumes and
optimize redistribution logistics, addressing challenges like unpredictable donation patterns and
high transportation costs. By leveraging historical data, the model will minimize costs and food
waste while maximizing deliveries to at-risk populations.
KEY OBJECTIVES
redict daily food donations from various sources (grocery stores, restaurants, etc.) based on
P
historical data using machine learning techniques such as time-series forecasting.
Optimize the scheduling of pick-up and delivery routes by integrating the predicted donation
volumes with transportation and storage constraints (e.g., perishability of food).
Minimize food wastage by ensuring timely transportation of perishable goods while reducing the
overall operational costs of food redistribution organizations.
MODELS & ALGORITHM
Algorithm Used:
Monte Carlo Simulation: The model uses Monte Carlo simulations to study the dynamic nature of food rescue and redistribution. The supply
of food is treated as a stochastic (random) process.
Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD): The food supply follows a heavy-tailed distribution, and the model fits this with a Generalized Pareto
Distribution to handle extreme supply events.
Optimization Problem: The food redistribution problem is framed as an optimization problem where the goal is to minimize the cost of
picking up food from donors while ensuring demand (hunger) is met. The optimization is based on a linear programming (LP) approach to
determine the optimal daily pickup schedules, which minimizes driving costs while meeting food demand.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS): GIS data is used to cluster donors based on their geographical proximity to minimize driving
distances for food pickups.
Pros:
1. Scalability: The algorithm can be scaled to larger regions or more donors as it models real-world variability and uncertainty.
2. Flexibility: By using LP, the algorithm can handle a wide variety of constraints, including donor availability and cost-efficiency.
3. Realistic: Monte Carlo simulations offer a realistic picture of the problem by accounting for random events (like large donations).
Cons:
1. Complexity: The heavy-tailed distribution and the Monte Carlo simulation require significant computational resources, especially
when modeling large-scale systems.
2. Assumptions: The algorithm assumes food expiration rates and donor availability, which may not always align with real-world
conditions.
Proven optimization
Optimization technique used May not handle real-time data
technique; effective for Scheduling food deliveries
Linear Programming to minimize waste by matching or complex, non-linear
scheduling and resource from surplus to areas in need.
supply with demand. problems well.
allocation.
Clustering algorithm used to Efficient for identifying Not good with clusters of
Grouping areas with similar
K-Means Clustering group similar sources of patterns in large datasets and varying density; requires
food demand or food donors.
surplus or demand centers. creating groupings. predefined number of clusters.
Model/Approach Description Advantages Disadvantages Use Case Example
Efficient in optimizing
Algorithms used for route Limited in handling uncertain Optimizing delivery routes
Graph-based Algorithms (e.g., transportation routes; can
optimization in food conditions like traffic or between food donors and
Dijkstra's, A)* reduce fuel costs and time for
distribution networks delays. recipients.
redistribution.
REFERENCES
https://www.mdpi.com/
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/home.jsp
https://www.researchgate.net/
https://scholar.google.com/
THANK YOU