Copy of Pastel Notebook · SlidesMania
Copy of Pastel Notebook · SlidesMania
We started by brainstorming
potential structures and
exchanging our thoughts.
Magi came up with the first
idea, and sketched out a
design that we all believed
could work.
How we did it ? - Nawaal
As the analysts,Nawaal and Rapin evaluated the design for potential weaknesses
and suggested improvements; for example, how could we stabilise the structure to
hold the marshmallow?
Sarah, taking on the chairperson role, kept us organized and made sure everyone
was clear on their roles and responsibilities as we worked together.
Once we had a plan, we started building. All four of us contributed, forming the
spaghetti structure through a balance of creativity with practicality. We
communicated effectively and kept each other on track and motivated throughout
the process.
02
Reflective Observation
Result
Our tower reached impressive heights—but
it didn’t last long!
Reflection
● Focusing on a solid foundation would
have allowed for sturdier spaghetti
walls.
● Prioritizing height alone led us to
overlook stability.
● Balancing height with structural
support is key for a resilient design.
03
Abstract Conceptualisation
Experience Learning
Team Conclusion
Task Conclusion
- Aiming to construct the structure as high as possible should not have been
prioritized over ensuring it is free standing with the added weight of the
marshmallow as towers end up collapsing.
-
04
Active Experimentation
Next time we will … - sarah
01 Improve communication
We will focus on our communication skills so that in future we
can avoid misunderstandings.
02 Establish timelines
We will set specific checkpoints to manage our time better as
a team and meet our deadlines more effectively.
03 Prioritize Evaluation
We will carefully analyze our work at each stage to catch any
issues early and ensure the quality of our final outcome
Thank you for
your attention
The Shadow
The Shadow has been physically present at both meetings but contributes very
little during discussions. Even when directly asked for input, they give minimal
responses, making it difficult for the team to gauge their opinions or
understand their perspective. As the project moves forward, the team is
wondering whether the task contributions from the Shadow are going to be up
to standard or if they will be caught off-guard by below-par work at a critical
time. They need to figure out how to encourage the Shadow to step out of the
background and engage more actively.
The Shadow
… …
Thank you!
Do you have
any
questions?