FM-AA-PPT-07

Rev. 02
10-Dec-2018

EVALUATION CHECKLIST FOR DEMONSTRATION TEACHING

SCALE with DESCRIPTIVE EQUIVALENT PANGASINAN STATE UNIVERSITY

5.00- 4.20 – Outstanding, 3.40- 4.19 -- Very Satisfactory, 2.60- 3.39 – Satisfactory, 1.80- 2.59 – Fair, 1.00- 1.79 -- Poor
CAMPUS Pangasinan State University, Alaminos City Campus
NAME OF STUDENT TEACHER Nora B. Palacielo
COOPERATING SCHOOL
COOPERATING TEACHER
SUBJECT English GRADE LEVEL 7
TOPIC/SUBJECT MATTER Composing Short Story Using Narrative Structure
DATE July 15, 2024 TIME 10:00am -11:00am
DIRECTION: Opposite each item, please check the box which represents your evaluation on the student teacher’s performance.
5- Excellent, 4- Very Satisfactory, 3- Satisfactory, 2- Fair, 1- Poor
CRITERIA 5 4 3 2 1
A. TEACHER’S INSTRUCTIONAL SKILLS
1. Ability to motivate learners
2. Knowledge of subject matter
3. Skill in selecting and using appropriate methods and techniques of teaching
4. Creativity in adapting methods to the pupils/students’ activities
5. Organization and sequence of lesson execution.
6. Skill in selecting and using effective teaching aids and devices
7. Sustenance of learner’s interest and attention.
8. Ability to explain and discuss abstract concepts within the grasping ability of the students
9. Ability to make use of effective evaluation of instruction
10. Motivation or explanation given for agreements/assignments
11. Identification and observation of safety measures
B. COMMUNICATION SKILLS
1. Voice control and modulation
2. Proficiency in the language of instruction (correct grammar and pronunciation)
3. Ability to ask relevant and thought-provoking questions
4. Skill in writing clearly and legibly both on the board and paper
C. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
1. Routine preparation of activities: systematic way of checking attendance,
assignment/homework, group work/projects, passing in and out of the room, etc.
2. Ability to enhance pupil/student participation.
3. Maintenance of order and discipline
4. Ability to organize instructional materials within easy reach
D. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY
1. Physical appearance and poise
2. Ability to command respect and attention
3. Ability to project a strong teacher’s personality

NOTE: 1 point penalty is equivalent to 1 point deduction to the total grade for every Tagalog word during the demo.

AVERAGE DEMONSTRATION TEACHING PERFORMANCE (TOTAL/26)

COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS

EVALUATOR
DESIGNATION

EVALUATION CHECKLIST FOR LESSON PLAN

 FM-AA-PPT-07
Rev. 02
10-Dec-2018
Criteria Excellent (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Fair (2) Poor (1) Rating
Objectives All standards are aligned, clearly and Objectives are aligned and Objectives are Some objectives are unclear or missing
Skill in selecting and concisely written. clearly stated. defined clear and are included
enhancing specific and
attainable objectives
Content/ Topic The content or topic is aligned with the The content or topic The content or topic The content or topic The content or
Skill in choosing the MELCS provided. somewhat aligns with the minimally aligns with barely align with the topic is not aligned
appropriate topic that is align MELCS provided the MELCS MELCS provided with the MELCS
with MELCs provided provided.
Learning Resources Learning resources are thoroughly Learning resources are Learning resources Learning resources No clear learning
completed and follow the appropriate adequately completed and are partially are partially completed resources
format. follow the appropriate completed and and not follow the
format. follow the appropriate format.
appropriate format.
Procedures The review of the lesson clearly The review of the lesson The review of the The review of the No alignment at all
Review of the Previous demonstrate how well it aligns with the somewhat shows how it lesson provides lesson gives little to no
Lesson subsequent topic. aligns with the subsequent minimal insight into indication of how it
topic how it aligns with aligns with the
the subsequent subsequent topic
topic
Establishing a Purpose for The lesson objectives are clearly The lesson objectives are The lesson The lesson objectives No purpose for the
the Lesson defined and understandable for the vaguely defined and may objectives are are inadequately lesson
students be unclear to students. poorly defined and defined and confusing
may be unclear to to students.
students.
Presenting Example/ Used literary pieces aligned with the The examples are The examples are The examples are The examples are
Instances grade standard and content standard somewhat aligned with the minimally aligned barely aligned with the not aligned with
grade standard and content with grade grade standards and the grade
With no grammar mistakes made. standard. standards and content standards. standards and
content standards. content standards.
With only 2-5 grammar With only 11-15
mistakes made. With only 6-10 grammar mistakes With more than 16
grammar mistakes made. grammar mistakes
made. made.
Discussing New Concepts 1 Excellent application of at least 2 Excellent application of at Good use of literary Adequate use of No application of a
literary approaches. least 1 literary approach. approach. literary approach literary approach
Applied all levels of comprehension in Applied at least three levels Applied at least two
all the areas of discussion. of comprehension in all the levels of Applied at least one No application of
areas of discussion. comprehension in level of levels of
Aligned with the grade standard and all the areas of comprehension in all comprehension
content standard Somewhat aligned with the discussion. the areas of not aligned with
grade standard and content discussion. the grade
Achieved at least three 21st century standard. Minimally aligned standards and
skills Achieved at least 3 21st with grade Barely aligned with the content standards
century skills standards and grade standards and
content standards. content standards. No 21st century
Achieved at least two 21st skills achieved.
century skills Achieved at least Achieved at least one
two 21st century 21st century skills
skills
Discussing New Concepts2 Excellent application of at least 2 Excellent application of at Good use of literary Adequate use of No application of a
literary approaches. least 1 literary approach. approach. literary approach literary approach
Applied all levels of comprehension in Applied at least three levels Applied at least two
all the areas of discussion. of comprehension in all the levels of Applied at least one No application of
areas of discussion. comprehension in level of levels of
Aligned with the grade standard and all the areas of comprehension in all comprehension
content standard Somewhat aligned with the discussion. the areas of not aligned with
grade standard and content discussion. the grade
Achieved at least three 21st century standard. Minimally aligned standards and
skills Achieved at least 3 21st with grade Barely aligned with the content standards
century skills standards and grade standards and
content standards. content standards. No 21st century
Achieved at least two 21st skills achieved.
century skills Achieved at least Achieved at least one
two 21st century 21st century skills
skills
Developing Mastery Have the ability to used coherent with coherent with the standard coherent with the coherent with the not included
the objectives/ standards authentic/ and considers time- standards standards but are
higher order thinking skills and allotment focused on lower-order
considers the time allotment thinking skills
Evaluating Learning Have the ability to used coherent with coherent with the standard coherent with the coherent with the not included
the objectives/ standards authentic/ and considers time- standards standards but are
higher order thinking skills and allotment focused on lower order
considers the time allotment thinking skills
TOTAL SCORE