PSTM-FINALS
PSTM-FINALS
Definition
Distance learning is an instructional method using telecommunications, such as video technology, live sessions, or
recorded materials, to facilitate teaching. It is increasingly used in academic settings due to demographic changes and
globalization, making education accessible to a wider audience.
Attention
The Bottleneck Theory explains that individuals can process only a limited number of stimuli simultaneously.
Coaching and practice help focus attention on relevant stimuli.
Feedback
Intrinsic Feedback: Performance awareness from within the individual.
Extrinsic Feedback: Provided by external sources like instructors.
Knowledge of Results (KR): Verbal feedback on performance outcomes.
Knowledge of Performance (KP): Feedback on the process of execution.
Practice Methods
1. Massed Practice: Continuous practice with minimal breaks.
2. Distributed Practice: Practice interspersed with rest periods.
3. Mental Practice: Visualizing and mentally rehearsing the task.
Whole vs. Part Learning
Use part learning for complex, multi-step skills.
Use whole learning for straightforward or highly integrated tasks.
Psychomotor Domain
Focuses on skill, action, muscle movement, and manual manipulation.
LESSON 3: PROMOTING AND ASSESSING CRITICAL THINKING
CRITICAL THINKING
Defined as the ability to make judgments based on standards.
Involves three phases:
1. Analyzes thinking
2. Evaluates thinking
3. Improves thinking
Critical thinking has three dimensions:
1. Analytic
2. Evaluative
3. Creative
Characteristics of a Well-Cultivated Critical Thinker
1. Raises important questions and problems clearly.
2. Gathers and evaluates relevant information effectively.
3. Develops well-reasoned conclusions and tests them against standards.
4. Thinks open-mindedly, recognizing alternative viewpoints and implications.
5. Communicates solutions to complex problems effectively.
Elements of Thought in Critical Thinking
1. Point of View
2. Purpose
3. Question at Issue
4. Information
5. Interpretation and Inference
6. Concepts
7. Assumptions
8. Implications and Consequences
Universal Intellectual Standards
1. Clarity: Understandable and meaningful.
2. Accuracy: Free of errors.
3. Precision: Detailed and exact.
4. Relevance: Relates to the matter at hand.
5. Depth: Addresses complexities and interrelations.
6. Breadth: Includes multiple perspectives.
7. Logic: Free of contradictions.
8. Significance: Focuses on the important.
9. Fairness: Unbiased and justifiable.
Using Student Profiles for Assessment
Criteria for exemplary students:
o Raises significant questions and issues.
o Analyzes and clarifies assumptions and concepts.
o Uses educated language and identifies diverse viewpoints.
o Demonstrates reasoning, implications, and outcomes.
Self-assessment questions:
o Do I raise critical issues in class?
o Am I clear in analyzing problems?
o Do I distinguish relevant from irrelevant information?
o Am I open to alternative viewpoints?
Reading and Writing: Critical Thinking Skills
Close Reading: Thinking from multiple perspectives.
Substantive Writing: Reflecting disciplined thought.
Interrelationship: Enhances critical reasoning through mutual reinforcement.
LESSON 4: CLINICAL TEACHING
INSTRUCTIONAL SETTINGS
1. Health Care Setting: Primary focus is health care delivery.
2. Health Care-Related Setting: Complementary to quasi-health agency services.
3. Non-Health Care Related Setting: Health care is incidental or supportive.
Factors Related to Instructional Settings
1. Organizational Factors
o Administrative support for health education.
o Time and resources allocated for education.
o Expertise of teaching staff.
2. Environmental Factors
o Availability of external resources.
o Structural characteristics influencing programs.
3. Clientele Factors
o Health status and developmental level of clients.
o Language, literacy, and cultural beliefs.
o Self-direction in seeking information.
STANDARD LABWORK
Focuses on:
o Intended Learning Outcomes
o Task Design: Cognitive structure, student involvement, and practical context.
Evaluation Models
1. Process Evaluation: Adjustments during educational activities.
2. Content Evaluation: Measures knowledge or skills gained.
3. Outcome Evaluation: Determines the effect of teaching (summative).
4. Impact Evaluation: Assesses broader effects on community/institution.
5. Program Evaluation: Judges the worth of educational programs.
LESSON 5: ASSESSING AND EVALUATING LEARNERS
ASSESSMENT VS. EVALUATION
1. Assessment: Gathers data to decide actions.
2. Evaluation: Measures success of an action.
Designing Practical Assessments
Effective design avoids:
o Vague or overly complex outcomes.
o Jargon or inappropriate expectations.
Features of good assessments:
o Validity: Measures intended outcomes.
o Reliability: Consistent grading.
o Fairness: Equal opportunities.
o Motivation: Inspires engagement.
o Efficiency: Balanced workload and clear grading.
Comprehensive Parameters for Motivational Assessment
1. Cognitive Variables: Readiness and beliefs about learning.
2. Affective Variables: Positive emotional states and moderate anxiety.
3. Physiological Variables: Capacity for required behaviors.
4. Experiential Variables: Success in prior experiences.
5. Environmental Variables: Support systems and physical setting.
6. Educator-Learner Relationship: Positive and productive interaction.