SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING LABORATORY REPORT RUBRIC (LEVEL 1)

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

LAB REPORT : OPEN ENDED LAB (CO3-PO9) NO STUDENT’S ID NAME GROUP MARKS

COURSE CODE & NAME : ECG 263 (SOIL ENGINEERING LABORATORY) 1.

SEMESTER : OCTOBER 2024 – FEBRUARY 2025 2.
LECTURER : 3.
20
TITLE OF EXPERIMENT : 4.

AFFECTIVE DOMAIN PERFORMANCE RUBRIC TOTAL MARK

NO AFFECTIVE DOMAIN PERFORMANCE SCALE

AND CRITERIA
0 1 2 3 4 MARKS
(Receiving, A1) Did not submit the report Not able to submit the report Not able to submit the report Not able to submit the Able to submit the report
1 on time. on time. report on time.
Punctuality (More than 2 days late) (2 days late) on time.
(1 day late) 4
No commitment to Shows little commitment to Shows great commitment and
(Organization, A4) organize the task organize the task, fair content work collaboratively to
and writing skill organize the task, excellent
2 Organize the task content and writing skill 2

Data collected is relevant,

(Valuing, A3) Data collected was not Data collected is relevant,
Data collected is relevant but Data collected is relevant and related to the objectives,
relevant and not sufficient related to the objectives
3 not sufficient to analyze sufficient to analyze with fair sufficient to analyze and
to analyze and interpret and sufficient to analyze
Ability to solve problems and interpret interpretation accurate interpretation of 4
with good interpretation
(Analysis & Data data.
Interpretation)

Discussion on results is very Description of result is Result and discussion are

(Organization, A4) Little discussion on what
No discussion on the difficult to follow, no generally clear. Some clearly stated, through
result mean and implications
meaning of experimental discussion on the meaning of discussion on what results discussion on what results
of results. Enough errors are
4 Organize, Manage results and very difficult to results and information is mean and implications of mean and implications of
made to be distracting, but
(Discussion) follow inaccurate that makes the results. No significant results. 4
some information is accurate
report unreliable errors are made Provide consistent accurate
information
No attempt was made to Conclusion is derived from Conclusion is good and Conclusion is good and Conclusion is excellent
(Characterization, A5) conclude, and objectives the collected and analyzed derived from the collected derived from the collected and derived from the
of the lab were not data, but it is not answering andanalyzed data and not and analyzed data and not collected and analyzed
5 answered the objectives from other sources but did not from other sources and data and not from other
Verifies
directly answering the directly answer the sources. Conclusion
(Conclusion)
objectives. objectives clearly answers the 4
objectives.

(Valuing, A3) Not able to acknowledge Able to acknowledge and list Able to acknowledge and
6 references out adequate ( at least 3) adapt very good references
relevant references (more than 4) with correct
References
format 2
SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING LABORATORY REPORT RUBRIC (LEVEL 1)
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

Table 1: Level of difficulty for each domain based on year

YEAR Cognitive
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
Knowledge Comprehension Application Analysis Synthesis Evaluation

Affective
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5
Receiving Responding Valuing Organization Characterization

1 30-45 45-65 10-25

2 20-35 40-60 20-35

3 10-25 45-55 30-45

Psychomotor
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7
Perception Set Guided Response Mechanism Complex Adaption Origination
Overt Response

1 55-65 35-45 0

2 25- 55-65 5-15

35
3 15- 55-65 15-25
25

Affective domain (Refer Table 1 for Year 2) Prepared by:

A1 - A2 : ( 4 / 20 marks) x 100 = 20
A3 - A4 : (12 / 20 marks) x 100 = 60
A5 : ( 4 / 20 marks) x 100 = 20

RESOURCE PERSON ECG263

1/10/2024
DATA ACQUISITION
DEPTH (m) NO. OF BLOWS
0-0.3 88
0.3-0.6 110
0.6-0.9 74
0.9-1.2 61
1.2-1.5 79

COMPLETE DATA

DEPTH (m) NO. OF BLOWS BEARING CAPACITY

(kN/m²)

0 - 0.3 88 105.6
0.3 - 0.6 110 132.0
0.6 - 0.9 74 88.8
0.9 - 1.2 61 73.2
1.2 - 1.5 79 94.8

GRAPH ANALYSIS

GRAPH 1 DEPTH (m) vs NO. OF BLOWS

 GRAPH 2 DEPTH (m) vs BEARING CAPACITY (kN/m²)

DISCUSSION
Based on consistency, the bearing capacity—the strength of the soil and soil profile—is what
this discussion is trying to determine. Correlating the measured number of blows with
empirical formulas or charts gets the bearing capacity. It is demonstrated that the bearing
capacities of the various soil layers vary. The foundation design will be influenced by the
varying strengths of each soil layer, which can be categorized.

From the table we can that the data for depth 9.0 -1.2 has a bearing 80 -280 kN/m². It is
because that the particular layers of soil are medium dense soil which can be deformed with
moderate hand pressure but resists light tools. This soil will hold its shape when squeezed
and requires more blowis during the test.At a certain depth the number of the blows might
increase when it touch the rock and compacted soil.

This data can tell that the layer of that soil is loose soil which can be deformed easily by hand
pressure. This type of can be penetrated by JKR PROBE with low number of blows and most
likely to have weaker strength in handling weight.
CONCLUSION
The JKR Probe test, which is limited to 15 meters and requires the number of blows per
meter to be recorded, can be used to assess the thickness of inappropriate material that
needs to be removed as well as for the preliminary design of embankments. The results can
be compared with a chart that has been produced to estimate the soil's carrying capacity.
The 60° cone penetrometer from JKR Probes is a light dynamic test in which a hammer is
used to drive the cone straight into the ground. Because it lacks the strength to penetrate the
medium, the probe cannot go through gravelly ground or medium-high soil.

APPENDIX

REFERENCES
[1] Yusof, M. F., Khalid, M. N. F. A., Tajudin, S. A. A., Madun, A., & Abidin, M. H. Z. (2017).
Correlation of JKR Probe with Undrained Shear Strength. MATEC Web of Conferences,
103,07009.
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710307009
[2] Lab Report JKR Probe Test. (n.d.). Dokumen.tips. Retrieved June 26, 2021, from
https://dokumen.tips/documents/lab-report-jkr-probe-test.html