First Week Reviewer
First Week Reviewer
Moreover, the main focus is on the arrangement of language, rather than on the implications of the
words, or on the biographical and historical relevance of the work in question. It ignored the text’s
historical, biographical and cultural context.
Also, it refers how a literary work can be understood only by reference to its intrinsic features,
which are the literary elements and devices such as: Characters, settings, plot, point of view,
conflict, symbolisms, and theme.
Literary devices: Metaphor, simile, irony, etc.
*Discuss or Review each element and device
Advantages of Formalism
1. Objective Analysis: Formalism allows for an objective analysis of a text. It focuses on the text
itself, not the author's intentions, the reader's reactions, or the social context. This can lead to a
more unbiased interpretation.
2. Close Reading: Formalism encourages close reading and detailed analysis of the text. This can
lead to a deeper understanding of the work.
3. Universal Application: Formalist principles can be applied to any text, regardless of its cultural
or historical context. This makes it a versatile tool for literary analysis.
Disadvantages of Formalism
1. Ignores Context: One of the main criticisms of formalism is that it ignores the social, historical,
and cultural context of a text. This can lead to a limited or incomplete understanding of the work.
2. Neglects Author's Intentions and Reader's Response: Formalism does not take into account
the author's intentions or the reader's response. This can result in a narrow interpretation of the
text.
3. Overemphasis on Structure: Formalism's focus on structure and form can sometimes
overshadow the content and themes of the text.
In conclusion, while formalism has its advantages in promoting objective and detailed analysis, it also has
its limitations, particularly in its neglect of context and reader's response. It's important to use it as one of
many tools in literary analysis, rather than the only approach.
STRUCTURALISM-
Structuralism is a way of understanding culture and meaning in the arts by relating the individual piece of
art (a novel, a painting, a symphony) to something larger. In Structuralist theory, the relationship between
cultural phenomena is a web, network, or structure, which exists underneath the way we think and act, and
produce art.
STRENGTH
One of the primary strengths of structuralism lies in its ability to deconstruct complex texts and reveal
hidden meanings. By focusing on the underlying structures of a literary work, structuralism helps to
reveal patterns and connections that may have otherwise gone unnoticed. This approach allows readers to
uncover deeper layers of meaning and understand the complexity of a text in a more objective manner.
By focusing on the text itself, structuralism avoids the pitfalls of authorial intention or societal influence,
ensuring a more rigorous and unbiased analysis.
https://www.classace.io/answers/write-an-essay-about-strengths-and-weaknesses-of-structuralism-as-a-
literary-theory
WEAKNESSES
Psychoanalytic criticism:
Psychoanalytic critics believe that an author’s unconscious thoughts are expressed through their
work.
It is a literary approach where critics see the text as if it were a kind of dream.
Psychoanalytic criticism is any form of criticism that draws on psychoanalysis, the practice
of analyzing the role of unconscious psychological drives and impulses in shaping human
behavior or artistic production
Psychoanalytic criticism adopts the methods of “reading” employed by Freud and later theorists
to interpret texts.
It argues that literary texts, like dreams, express the secret unconscious desires and
anxieties of the author, that a literary work is a manifestation of the author’s own neuroses.
The author’s own childhood traumas, family life, sexual conflicts, fixations, and such will be
traceable within the behavior of the characters in the literary work.
all such characters are projections of the author’s psyche
Psychoanalytic criticism adopts the methods of "reading" employed by Freud and later
theorists to interpret texts.
argues that literary texts, like dreams, express the secret unconscious desires and
anxieties of the author, that a literary work is a manifestation of the author's own
neuroses.
The author's own childhood traumas, family life, sexual conflicts, fixations, and such
will be traceable within the behavior of the characters in the literary work.
all such characters are projections of the author's psyche.
Common Symbolisms
1. Sharp Objects: Items like swords, knives, and pens often symbolize male power and
aggression. They represent the phallus and can signify dominance or sexual potency.
2. Tall Structures: Obelisks and towers can symbolize the erect penis, representing strength
and authority. Examples include the Washington Monument and various ancient
monuments
3. Animals: Certain animals, like bulls or stallions, can embody phallic symbolism due to their
associations with virility and power
- body is seen as a home for the mind and spirit. Just like a house protects its inhabitants,
the body protects our thoughts and feelings.
- Parents are viewed as powerful figures, much like royalty. They hold authority and
influence over our lives, shaping our experiences and values.
7. Caves and Enclosed Spaces: These can represent the female body, particularly the womb,
suggesting themes of creation and protection 1
8. Water: Often associated with femininity, water symbolizes life and fertility, reflecting the
nurturing qualities of women
Disadvantages
Reader-response criticism: Reader-response criticism is rooted in the belief that a reader's reaction to or
interpretation of a text is as valuable a source of critical study as the text itself.
Focuses on the individual reaction and interpretation of a text.
-
Advantages
-Authenticity: Provides a genuine and heartfelt connection to the text, reflecting the reader’s true
emotional responses.
- Accessibility: Makes literary analysis more relatable and approachable for those not familiar with
formal literary criticism.
Disadvantages:
- Lack of Analytical Depth: May not delve deeply into the text’s formal qualities or broader themes.
- Overemphasis on Subjectivity: Can lead to interpretations that are highly individual and may not
consider alternative readings or textual evidence.
Reader-Response Criticism
offers a more systematic approach, analyzing how meaning is created through the reader’s
interaction with the text and recognizing the role of various interpretive strategies. It provides a
broader theoretical framework and can accommodate a range of interpretations, though it may be
more complex and less focused on individual emotional responses.
In essence, while both approaches emphasize the reader’s role in creating meaning, Personal-Reaction
Criticism tends to be more focused on individual emotional experiences, whereas Reader-Response
Criticism provides a more structured analysis of the interpretive process.
focuses on how readers are
actively engaged in the creation of meaning
in a text
focuses on how readers are
actively engaged in the creation of meaning
in a text
focuses on how readers are
actively engaged in the creation of meaning
in a text
focuses on how readers are
actively engaged in the creation of meaning
in a text
PROPONENTS
Louise Rosenblatt (1904-2005)
Louise Rosenblatt is a highly influential critic who saw reading as a transaction between reader and
text, where both are equally important.
Rosenblatt is one of the Reader Response critics that thinks there are acceptable and less-
acceptable interpretations of texts - not all are valid.
To Rosenblatt, the text acts as a stimulus to the reader that invites them to find personal
interpretations; and as a blueprint that disciplines the reader's interpretation so that it doesn't
stray too far from the contents of the text.
2. Affective Stylistics:
6. Reception Theory:
Advantages
1. Personal Engagement: It emphasizes the reader's personal interaction with the text, allowing for
a richer, more individualized understanding of the work. This approach can reveal unique insights
based on the reader's experiences and perspectives.
2. Flexibility: Reader-response criticism accommodates diverse interpretations, acknowledging that
different readers can derive varied meanings from the same text. This flexibility can highlight the
text's multifaceted nature.
3. Empowerment: It empowers readers by validating their subjective experiences and responses.
This can make literary analysis more accessible and inclusive, as it doesn’t rely solely on a single,
"correct" interpretation.
Disadvantages
1. Subjectivity: The heavy emphasis on individual responses can lead to highly subjective
interpretations that might lack grounding in the text itself. This can make it challenging to reach a
consensus on the text’s meaning.
2. Overemphasis on Reader: By focusing primarily on the reader’s experience, this approach
might neglect the text’s inherent qualities and how they influence interpretation. This can
sometimes lead to interpretations that are more about the reader than the text.
3. Variability: Since interpretations can vary widely, it may be difficult to establish a coherent
critical framework or to compare different readings systematically.
QUESTIONS:
- How do you feel about the text on your first reading? Does your reaction change upon subsequent
readings?
- How do your own experiences, values, or cultural background shape your understanding of the text?
4. How do different elements of the text (e.g., language, structure, tone) influence your reading?
- How do the text’s style, narrative techniques, or language choices impact your interpretation and
emotional response?
5. How does your interpretation of the text compare with others’ interpretations?
- Have you discussed the text with others? How do your interpretations align with or differ from theirs?
- How do you see your role in interpreting the text? What part do you believe the text itself plays in
shaping meaning?
7. How does the context in which you are reading the text influence your understanding?
- Does your current life situation, mood, or environment affect how you read and interpret the text?
8. How does the text challenge or reinforce your existing beliefs or assumptions?
- Does the text prompt you to reconsider or affirm your personal beliefs or views? How so?
9. What themes or messages resonate with you most strongly, and why?
- Are there specific themes, symbols, or messages in the text that you find particularly compelling or
significant?
10. How might different readers, with different backgrounds or experiences, interpret this text differently?
- How might various cultural, social, or personal perspectives lead to different readings of the same
text?
11. Does your emotional or intellectual response to the text change based on different contexts or
experiences?
12. What does your reading reveal about your own identity or worldview?
- How does your interaction with the text reflect aspects of your identity, such as your values, interests,
or cultural background?