Untitled spreadsheet
Untitled spreadsheet
Sustainable allocation of
urban transportation land at
Social Science Research
February 07, 2024 the regional level: A
Network
theoretical and empirical
analysis
Urbanization, transportation
infrastructure, ICT, and
April 24, 2021 Cities, Volume 115
economic growth: A
temporal causal analysis
Smarter Mobility for Better
Urban Development: An
Studies in Social Science &
Exploration of Urban Smart
May 01, 2023 Humanities, Paradigm
Transportation Governance
Academic Press
Based on International
Comparison
The Future of Autonomous
Engineering Science & Vehicles in the U.S. Urban
Technology Journal, Landscape: A Review:
January 13, 2024
Volume 5, Issue 1 Analyzing Implications for
Traffic, Urban Planning,
and the Environment
The specific journal or A Comprehensive
conference is not explicitly Algorithm for AI-Driven
January 01,2024 mentioned, but it appears to Transportation
be a conference paper Improvements in Urban
uploaded to ResearchGate. Areas
NEEDS SOLUTION
>It uniquely integrates theoretical and >The study finds that transportation needs and
empirical analysis to support the land allocation priorities vary widely across the
sustainable allocation of transportation YREB. Developed urban areas require multi-
land at a regional level. Unlike previous modal transportation systems and more land,
studies, it offers a multidimensional while less-developed regions need targeted
approach that includes both land demand infrastructure to support basic connectivity. The
forecasting and connectivity assessments, results suggest that transportation land allocation
emphasizing balanced growth across the should be adjusted to the developmental stage and
YREB. industrial needs of each city.
>The study found significant long-run
>It analyzes the temporal causality relationships between urbanization, transportation
between all four variables (urbanization, infrastructure, ICT infrastructure, and economic
transportation infrastructure, ICT growth for G-20 countries.
infrastructure, and economic growth) >In the long term,
simultaneously. the co-development of urbanization and
>It focuses specifically on the G-20 infrastructure positively influences economic
countries, a group that had not been growth, but the relationship is complex with some
extensively studied in this context feedback loops. On the other hand, in short-run
results were less uniform but still indicated
significant interactions among the variables
>It highlights key distinctions between
smart mobility models in Chinese and
>It indicates that while cities share common goals,
non-Chinese cities, primarily in
such as reducing congestion and enhancing
governance approaches. Chinese cities like
sustainability, they implement smart mobility
Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen feature
initiatives in distinct ways influenced by local
government-led models emphasizing top-
contexts. Amsterdam and New York adopt
down control and centralized planning,
"problem-oriented" approaches, developing user-
focusing on integrating private enterprises
focused solutions like bike lanes and pedestrian
and public entities under governmental
safety measures, while Singapore and Chinese
direction. In contrast, cities like
cities focus on government-led system integration
Amsterdam, Singapore, and New York
and high-tech solutions. Overall, the study
adopt more collaborative governance
suggests that multi-stakeholder engagement and
frameworks, encouraging private sector
technology-driven solutions are central to the
innovation and citizen involvement, which
future of urban mobility.
helps create tailored solutions to unique
local issues.
>The findings indicate that autonomous vehicles
>Unlike other studies that might focus could significantly impact urban areas by reducing
only on technological advancements, this traffic congestion, enhancing safety through
article provides a complex perspective by decreased accidents, and supporting
also considering regulatory, societal, and environmental sustainability by lowering
environmental factors. The study goes emissions, particularly when integrated with
beyond technical aspects to address the electric vehicle technology. It also emphasizes that
ethical, policy, and infrastructure-related these potential benefits depend on successfully
challenges posed by AV integration in overcoming technological barriers, such as the
urban settings. This analysis highlights the need for reliable AV navigation systems and
factors that must be addressed to ensure secure infrastructure. In the future, AVs could
AVs contribute positively to urban life. transform urban mobility by making cities more
efficient, safer, and environmentally friendly.
>It is expected to reduce congestion, optimize
public transit routes, and improve parking
>It stands out due to its holistic AI-driven
availability, resulting in a smoother and more
approach, addressing diverse aspects of
efficient transportation experience for urban
urban transportation. Unlike traditional
residents. It supports sustainable mobility by
models, it combines advanced technology
enhancing access to green transit options and
integration, real-time data analytics, and
reducing emissions. The system’s adaptability and
user engagement, adapting to dynamic
continuous improvements help maintain relevance
urban needs.
as urban dynamics shift, ensuring ongoing positive
impacts.