PA final notes2
PA final notes2
• While in daily basis the responsibilities of public administrators can vary depending on
the type of organization they work for, the common thread among public administrators
is most typically a deep commitment to serve their communities and contribute to their
overall improvement.
• The term “public service” is used frequently in the field of public administration, and it is
this desire to serve the public good that calls people to become a public administrator.
• Integrity: the obligations of public service must come before personal interests.
• Honesty: the Civil Service must be truthful and open.
• Objectivity: advice and decisions must be rigorous and evidence-based.
• Impartiality: the Civil Service must act according to the merits of the case, and equally
serve governments of all political parties.
• These investments have to be made by the central government and administered with
the help of the local governments and the local communities.
• Apart from the financial investments, a lot of organizational effort is required to meet
these needs of the citizens.
• Public Administration is an activity as old as human civilization. But as a social science
theorization on public administration is very recent. In 1887, Woodrow Wilson wrote
the book “The Study of Public
• Administration”, and laid the foundation of the science of Public
• Administration.
• After that, PA experienced rapid transformation in its scope, nature, and role.
• Public Administration as an activity as old as human civilization. But as a social science
theorization on public administration is very recent.
• Woodrow Wilson - “The Study of Public Administration”
• „Administration‟ - Latin word „ad and ministrare‟ which means „to serve‟ or „to look
after the people‟ or „to care for‟ or to manage
• the term administration means management of affairs - public or private.
• Luther Gluck “Administration has to do with getting things done; with the
accomplishment of defined objective.”
Seven types of functions which shows the scope of Public Adminstration are as follows:
Prevailing view :
Prevailing view divides the scope of Public Adminstration into two parts.-
1) Administrative theory
2) Applied administration
Adminstrative theory :
Applied administration
In todays modern state and in developing countries functions and role of Public Adminstration
is very important.
The role and importance of Public Adminstration are as follows.
1. It is the basis of government.
2. It is the instrument of change in the society.
3. It plays vital role in the life of the people.
4. It is an instrument for executing laws, policies, programmes of the state.
5. It is a stabilising force in the society as it provides continuity.
6. It is instrument of national integration in the developing countries which are facing classwars.
5. It is instrument of national integration in the developing countries which are facing classwars –
Conclusion -
The success of governement is dependent on the ability of public administration. The future of civilized
government rests upon the ability, to develop a service and philosophy and a practice of adminstration
competent to discharge the Public functions of civilized society.
• Woodrow Wilson, former U.S. President, the father of American Public Administration.
• Wilson and his contribution to the subject of public administration is widely read and referred
to. He was one of the first political leaders who emphasized the need to increase the efficiency
of the Government.
• Wilson argued that administration is the most obvious part of the Government and the least
discussions happen around it
• As a discipline Public Administration consists of organizational theory and behavior, public
personnel administration, public financial administration, comparative and development
administration and public policy analysis.
each of which offers a different perspective on how an administrator practices public administration.
• The classical theory projects public administration as a science. A classical theory defines how to
design and conduct the operations of any organization or system. A public administration can
also be considered as a system where we find the involvement of various officers with their
responsibilities.
• Postmodern Public Administration is linked to the capitalist model of the late 20th and
21st century
• The internal operations of almost all existing government organizations are referred to
as post-modern public administration. Public administration is a broad concept to
include all functions in the executive branch that have an impact on the general public.
Members of public administration come in different forms and quantities. When
understanding the theory of postmodern public administration, it is important to make
a differentiation between postmodern theory and the postmodern era as well as being
able to differentiate between post-modernity (period of time) and postmodernism
(theory/philosophy).
Government Governance
Superstructure Functionality
decisions Processes
rules Goals
roles Performance
Implementation Coordination
Outputs Outcomes
2. Participants refers to
Undertaking development for and Participation of beneficiaries and
enhancing people’s access to
and influence on public policy by the people. affected groups.
processes Interface between government
and the private sector
Decentralization of public and
service delivery functions
(empowerment of Local
Governments).
Cooperation with non
government organization.
• The World Bank defines governance as the manner in which power is exercised in the way the
economic and social resources of a country are managed.
• UNDP described governance as the exercise of economic, political and administrative authority
inherent in the management of a country’s affairs at all levels amid a wide variety of
mechanisms, processes and institutions, through which citizens articulate their interests,
exercise their legal rights, meet their obligations and mediate their differences.
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development - describes governance as the use of
political authority and exercise of control in a country in relation to the management of its
resources aiming at sustainable development through the creation of a conducive environment
leading to a proper functioning of the state for the benefit of the population.
• In governance, citizens are rightly concerned with a government’s responsiveness to their needs
and protection of their rights.
• The challenge for all societies is to create a system of governance that promotes supports and
sustains human development - especially for the poorest and most marginal.
• Good governance - participatory, transparent and accountable, effective and equitable;
promotes the rule of law; ensures that political, social and economic priorities are based on
broad consensus in society and that the voices of the poorest and the most vulnerable are heard
in decision-making over the allocation of development resources.
Governance:
1. economic,
2. political and
3. administrative.
• Encompassing all three, good governance defines the processes and structures that guide
political and socio-economic relationships.
• Governance encompasses the state, but it transcends the state by including the private sector
and civil society organizations.
• The state is defined to include political and public sector institutions.
• Some say that the private sector is part of civil society.
• Civil society, lying between the individual and the state, comprises individuals and groups
(organized or unorganized) interacting socially, politically and economically - regulated by formal
and informal rules and laws.
1) The Purpose:
–Private: to increase their profits through customers.
–Public: to serve the public interest, and everyone is served regardless their social status.
2.Ownership:
–Public: receiving money (financial resources) from the government budget appropriations, although
agency may receive profits from people (e.g. fees, charges).
• Let us first understand the differences and see what the authors and subject matter experts
have to say about it.
Differences
• Public Administration is different from private administration in terms of the working
environment i.e the institutional settings in which it functions.
• Paul H. Appleby, an important American theorist of public administration in democracies, was
the prominent supporter of this view.
Appleby :
• A-The first is the political character
• B-The second is the breadth of scope, impact and consideration
• C-The public accountability‟.
• John Gaus of Harvard Graduate School of Public Administration regarded government activities
as “different from that of private organizations almost in kind as well as in scope”.
• Josia Stamp went a step further and identified four aspects of differences of which the only one
similar to that of Appleby‟s is that of public accountability or public responsibility as Stamp
identifies it.
• The other three are:
• 1.Principle of uniformity
• 2.Principle of external financial control
• 3. Principle of service motive
• Herbert Simonhad explained the very practical differences based on popular beliefs and
imagination and therefore might seem more appealing. He said “Public Administration is
bureaucratic while private administration is business like. Public administration is political while
private administration is apolitical. And finally; the aspect most of us would swear by that public
administration is characterized by red tape while the private administration is free of it.
• Peter Ferdinand Drucker, an Austrian-American management consultant, educator, and author,
whose writings contributed to the philosophical and practical foundations of the modern
business corporation.
• Drucker : While the public administration functions on service intuition the private
administration follows the business intuition.
• In comparison to private administration, public administration enjoys high degree of status and
prestige. It is because of the supreme power lies on the governmental machinery. Public
Administration rendering more service to the public than private organization.
• Public Administration is subjected to political orientation and direction as under the policies the
bureaucrats implement the policy whereas the private administration does not have any
political direction. The ends the private administration follows are of its own decision and
choice. Their objectives do not depend upon the political decision makers. But the administrator
under public administration follows the orders of the executive authorities with little option of
his own.
• The principal feature of public Administration is service oriented and profit motive. Its objective
is to rendered service to the public and stimulate community welfare.
• The Private administration is characterized by profit motive.
• Its main objective is to maximize profit.
• Ludwig Von Mises “Business management or profit management is management directed by the
profit motive. The objective of business management is to make a profit. The objectives of
Public administration cannot be measured in money terms and cannot checked by accountancy
method. ”
Principle of Uniformity
• The principles of Public administration is based on the principle of uniformity.
• According to this principle there is no concept like favour and disfavor. All are equal under the
banner of public administration.
• The private administration need not to worry about the uniformity in treatment. The public
administration believes in the principle of „First come, first serve motto‟.
Establishing Public Relation
• The Public and Private Administration also differs on the ground of establishing their public
relation.
• It is the public organization who gives more importance to the people rather than the business
or private organization. But the business or private organizations gives more importance on
business which is more profit motive in nature.
The matters of Efficiencies and effectiveness
• In the matters of efficiency, the private organizations are much superior then the public.
• In private organization efficiency is measured in terms of resources they use. In this organization
the performance of the employees are important which matters the input- output relationship.
• Efficiency of the employees is calculated as „profit earning‟ in the organizations. But if one takes
profit as the indicator in the public organization, it will be a narrow view of the role of this
sector.
• Effectiveness refers to the successful achievement of specific goals.
Different in the principle of organization
• By observing the above differences and similarities D. Waldo said “The generalization which
distinguished public administration from private administration by special care for equality of
treatment, Legal authorization of, and responsibility of action, public justification or justifiability
of decision, financial probity and meticulousness, and so forth are of very limited applicability. In
fact, public and private administration are the two species of the same genus, but they have
special values and techniques of their own which give to each its distinctive character. ”
• From the light of the discussion on differences between public and private administration, it can
be concluded that there are a lot of fundamental differences between public and private
administration, but it is true that there are some similarities also.
• Many emphasize the differences between public and private administrations, while others
emphasize the similarities between the two. The Public Private Partnership (PPP) is very
important today. Many things in public administration today can be achieved with the help of
private administration. That’s why Recently, the line between private and public concepts has
not been clear.
• Judging by the necessity of the administrative system as a whole, it can be said that it is not
possible to have any real purpose in verifying the differences between the two or the errors of
both. What is needed is a joint effort of both private and public administration.
• The goals and objectives of the government administration cannot be achieved without the help
of non-governmental organizations or private administration. It is possible to build a healthy and
strong administrative system through the skills, cooperation and coordination of both and this
environment is beneficial for both government and non-government organizations.
• Administration‟ - Latin word „ad and ministrare‟ which means „to serve‟ or „to look after the
people‟ or „to care for‟ or to manage.
• 1970s, efforts at decentralisation began, and in the 1980s, public administration reforms
focused on ‘downsizing’ the public sector, primarily through job reduction, retrenchment and
other attempts to control salary costs.
• From the 1990s - ‘New Public Management’ reforms
• Decentralization—the transfer of authority, responsibility and resources over public function
from the central government to local governments or other local entities—is one of the most
significant public sector reforms pursued by countries around the world.
• Decentralization of the government occurs when there is a transfer of authority, responsibility
and resources from the central government to local governments or other local entities—is one
of the most significant public sector reforms pursued by countries around the world.
• The local government “is the lowest level of elected territorial organization within a state” that
has the dual function of providing local public services and implementing national welfare
policies (Atienza 2006).
Three types of decentralization within the public sector:
(i) Political decentralization
(ii) Fiscal decentralization
(iii) Administrative decentralization
Decentralisation, a multidimensional concept
Administrative decentralisation
• The most radical form of administrative decentralisation is devolution, with local government
having full responsibility for hiring/firing of staff and assigning authority/responsibility for
carrying out tasks.
• De‐concentration is the transfer of authority and responsibility from one level of the central
government to another, with the local unit accountable to the central government ministry or
agency which has been decentralised.
• Delegation, is the redistribution of authority and responsibility to local units of government or
agencies that are not always necessarily branches, or local offices of the delegating authority,
with the bulk of accountability still vertically directed upwards towards the delegating central
unit.
• Dennis Rondinelli (1981; 1999), defined decentralization as the “the transfer of authority and
responsibility for public functions from the central government to subordinate or quasi-
independent government organizations or the private sector.”
• or
• “transfer of [authority and] responsibility for planning, management, resource-raising and -
allocation and other functions from the central government and its agencies to (a) field units of
central government ministries or agencies, (b) subordinate units or levels of government, (c)
semi-autonomous public authorities or corporations, (d) areawide, regional or functional
authorities, or (e) nongovernmental private or voluntary organizations.”
• Decentralization is one of the broadest movements and most contentious policy issues in
development.
• 80% - 100% of countries in the world experimenting with decentralization (World Bank).
• At the center of reform throughout Latin America, Asia and Africa; also EU, UK & US.
• Scope of authority and resources devolved: Local governments spend 10 - 50% of total revenues
(Campbell, 2003)
Arguments against
(i) decrease efficiency in public goods production
(ii) decrease the quality of policy-making
(iii) increase graft and corruption
(iv) facilitate elite c
(v) inc
Theory provides a strong rationale
• Bring government “closer to the people” …> better public goods, more effective government
• Smaller scale facilitates information, participation and accountability
• Deepens democracy and lowers costs
• Local homogeneity vs. national heterogeneity
• Counteract centrifugal forces that cause political tensions/violence [Spain, UK]
Policy Implications (i)
• Good decentralization should improve technical efficiency in education and health.
(1) Better quality and quantity or services
(2) Better outcomes (e.g. literacy, infant mortality).
• Good decentralization will increase allocative efficiency in education. In health too, if D includes
conditional transfers and retained central authority in areas with large externalities.
Local Governance
• Improving local governance is a vital tool to guarantee peace, boost economic development,
maximize administrative efficiency, and ensure social inclusion and environmental sustainability
• Local governance comprises a set of institutions, mechanisms and processes through which
citizens and their groups can articulate their interests and needs, mediate their differences, and
exercise their rights and obligations at the local level.
• Local governance emphasises the need to look beyond the narrow perspective of legal
frameworks and local government entities. It seeks to include the multiplicity of formal and
informal relationships between different actors in development (e.g. local government, the
private sector, associations, de‐concentrated agencies, CSOs) that shape and influence the
output and effectiveness of political and administrative systems at a sub‐national level. There is
a large degree of synergy and coherence between supporting national governance processes
and local governance, as many of the aspects are in fact the same. Therefore, it is necessary to
work with governance principles at local levels to strengthen local governance processes.
The significant characteristics of Local government are as follows :
1) Engaged in solving the problems of the local people, in a village, town or city.
2) Created by the laws of State Legislatures.
3) Required to function as per the provisions of the law.
4) Enjoys autonomy and has independence in decision making as the State governments do not interfere
in the local government’s day-to- day administration.
5) Affairs are managed by the representatives elected by the people in the area.
Difference between decentralisation and local governance?
• The main differences between decentralisation and local governance are in the actual actors
participating in the process and the mode of interaction between governments, the private
sector and civil society.
• Decentralisation pertains to public sector institutional and organisational reforms and processes
and the support thereof, whereas local governance pertains more to supporting the creation of
an enabling environment where multi‐stakeholder processes ‐ including public and private
sector, as well as civil society – interact to foster effective local‐development processes.
• Local economic development is a transformation process of the way economic and political
decisions are made at the local level, with the end objective of improving the living conditions of
the local society in an inclusive manner.
• It takes place through organized negotiation processes between local actors from civil society,
the public sector and the private sector that seek to address the different challenges faced by
the territory.
• The main aim of LED is to offer local government, the private sector, the non‐profit sectors, and
the local community the opportunity to work together to improve the local economy.
• It aims to enhance competitiveness and thus to encourage sustainable growth that is inclusive.
• Local governments play an important role in democracy. Their effective functioning delivers
good governance at the local level.
• 1.Proximity : They are close to the people.
• 2.Training School of democracy : Imparts training in democratic citizenship - Makes people
aware of the importance of having power and their responsibilities in the exercise of power
helps the people learn.
• 3. Decentralization of Power : Assigning certain functions and responsibilities, along with
necessary powers and resources, is known as democratic decentralization. Local governments
facilitate such decentralization of power.
• 4. Generates civic sense : Living in an area for generations develops in the people a sense of
affinity towards it.
• It helps them identify the local problems.
e-Governance
• E-governance has become an integral part of public administration reforms around the world.
What is e-Government?
• The use by the Government of web-based Internet applications and other information
technologies, combined with processes that implement these technologies, to:
• enhance the access to and delivery of Government information and services to the public, other
agencies, and other government entities, or
• bring about improvements in Government operations that may include effectiveness, efficiency,
service quality, or transformation"
• e-government refers to the use by government agencies of information technologies that have
the ability to transform relations with citizens, business, and other arms of government.
• “e-governance: the use of the internet by governments to make it possible for people to use
government services and be involved in making decisions:”, Cambridge Dictionary
• E-Governance is managing, controlling and reporting of processes, using electronic systems such
as computers, internet, etc. within a private as well as public organization
• E-governance, expands to electronic governance, is the integration of Information and
Communication Technology (ICT) in all the processes, with the aim of enhancing government
ability to address the needs of the general public.
• The basic purpose of e-governance is to simplify processes for all, i.e. government, citizens,
businesses, etc. at National, State and local levels.
• It is the use of electronic means, to promote good governance.
• It represent the implementation of information technology in the government processes and
functions so as to cause simple, moral, accountable and transparent governance.
• It entails the access and delivery of government services, dissemination of information,
communication in a quick and efficient manner.
•
Benefits of E-governance
• Reduced corruption
• High transparency
• Increased convenience
• Growth in GDP
• Direct participation of constituents
• Reduction in overall cost.
• Expanded reach of government
• Through e-governance, the government plans to raise the coverage and quality of information
and services provided to the general public, by the use of ICT in an easy, economical and
effective manner.
• E-governance is the use of Information Technology for delivering relevant government
information and services efficiently and transparently to citizens, businesses, and other arms of
government for wider participation in a representative democracy.
Purpose of e-Governance:
• The basic purpose of e-governance is the simplify processes for everyone, e.i. government,
citizens, businesses, at all levels, central and local levels.
• To promote good governance. It connotes the implementation of information technology in the
government processes and functions so as the cause simple, moral, accountable and
transparent governance.
• To provide access to government services, dissemination of information, communication in a
quick and efficient manner.
The objectives of e governance are as follows-
• One of the basic objectives of e-governance is to make every information of the government
available to all in the public interest.
• One of its goals is to create a cooperative structure between the government and the people
and to seek help and advice from the people, to make the government aware of the problems of
the people.
• To increase and encourage people’s participation in the governance process.
• e-Governance improves the country’s information and communication
• technology and electronic media, with the aim of strengthening the country’s economy by
keeping governments, people and businesses in tune with the modern world.
• One of its main objectives is to establish transparency and accountability in the governance
process.
• To reduce government spending on information and services.
• Electronic governance or e-governance is the application of information technology for
delivering government services, exchange of information, communication transactions,
integration of various stand-alone systems between government to citizen (G2C), government-
to-business (G2B), government-to- government (G2G), government-to-employees (G2E) as well
as back- office processes and interactions within the entire governance framework.
Government-to-Government (G2G).
• G2G e-government involves sharing data and conducting electronic exchanges between
governmental actors. This involves both intra and inter-agency exchanges at the national level,
as well as exchanges between the national, provincial, and local levels. G2G applications
constitute the maximum chunk of the e-governance functions.
Government-to-Citizen (G2C)
• G2C initiatives are designed to facilitate citizen interaction with government, which is what
some observes perceive to be the primary goal of e-government.
• These initiatives attempt to make transactions, such as renewing licenses and certifications,
paying taxes, and applying for benefits, less time consuming and easer to carry out.
• G2C initiatives also often strive to enhance access to public information through the use of
dissemination tools, such as Web sites and/or kiosks.
Government to Business (G2B)
• Government-to-Business initiatives receive a significant amount of attention, in part, because of
high enthusiasm of the business sector and the potential for reducing costs through improved
procurement practices and increased competition. The G2B sector includes both the sale of
surplus government goods to the public, as well as the procurement of goods and services.
Although not all are directly dependent on the us of information technology, several different
procurement methods are used in relation to the G2B sector.
Government to Employee (G2G)
• The Government to Employee is the internal part of G2G sector. G2E aims to bring employees
together and improvise knowledge sharing. G2E provides online facilities to the employees like
applying for leave, reviewing salary payment records, and checking the balance of the holiday.
Features of E Governance
• De bureaucratization: Due to e-governance, the gap between the people and the government in
all the services of the government is narrowing and the dependence of the people on the
bureaucracy is also greatly reduced.
• E-Services: Its main feature is the provision of services through the Internet. As a result, we get
G2C, G2B, G2E, etc. services.
• International Services: through e-governance, all the essential services can be delivered to the
citizens who are living outside of their country for job purposes or any other reasons.
• It enhances the right to express to the citizens. Using the means of e- governance anyone can
share their views with the government on any bill or act or decision taken by the government.
• Economic Development: With the introduction of e-governance, various information like import-
export, registration of companies, investment situations, etc. are available through the internet.
As a result, time is saved, procrastination decreases, and economic dynamism increases.
• Reduce inequality: using e-governance tools everyone can gather information and empower
themselves. In this globalized world, knowledge is power, and means of e-governance empower
us by providing relevant information at minimal cost, effort, and time.
• E-Governance can be considered as the social inclusive policy for development of transparency
and accountability of both people in society and administration. This policy involves providing
the services to the people with collection of information through the institutional and
communicational development.
Technologies can serve as a variety of different ends:
• A. better delivery of government services to citizens
• B. improved interactions with business and industry
• C. citizen empowernment through access to information, or more efficient government
management.
• The resulting benefits can be less corruption, increased transparency, greater convenience,
revenue growth and or cost reduction.
• Governance has become a major requirement in most organizations and business communities.
• E-Governance applies to both: Government as well as private organizations.
What is SMART Governance?
• Simple — implies simplification of rules and regulations of the government and avoiding
complex processes with the application of ICTs and therefore, providing a user-friendly
government.
• Moral — meaning the emergence of a new system in the administrative and political machinery
with technology interventions to improve the efficiency of various government agencies.
• Accountable — develop effective information management systems and other performance
measurement mechanisms to ensure the accountability of public service functionaries.
• Responsive — Speed up processes by streamlining them, hence making the system more
responsive.
• Transparent — providing information in the public domain like websites or various portals
hence making functions and processes of the government transparent.
• As a leader, you are expected to give advice, guidance, motivation and inspiration to your team.
• Public sector leaders also face different challenges than in the private sector, and perhaps call
on different competencies.
• For example, a study by Hudson, Decoding the DNA of Public and Private Sector Leaders, a
recruitment and talent management company in the Netherlands, found public sector leaders
are confronted with the challenge to deliver public services efficiently in accordance with the
authorized procedures, processes, and rules.
• Public sector senior leaders are typically prone to follow and monitor rules and procedures and
give clear directions about the way things need to be done.
Core qualities that come from some of the greatest leaders there has ever been.
These can include:
• Honesty and trustworthy
• Self-aware and ethical
• Strategic thinking
• Highly motivated to reach goals
• Ambitious and courageous
• Committed
• Public leadership has been generally described as a "role where a person holds a public office
and serves and guides the community as a whole" for example, a Mayor.
• Nothing in public sector is more important, interesting, or mysterious than leadership.
• In a world characterized by diffusion of power and policymaking regulation and the delivery of
public services administrative leaders play a critical roles in accomplishing the work of
democratic governance.
• The public sector is fundamental to our society and is an essential element in protecting safety,
promoting social cohesion, delivering justice, supporting learning and helping people live
healthy lives. The skills of the workforce within the sector are key to successfully delivering
against a range of social and economic priorities
• These findings(30% genetic, 70% learned) propose that leaders are made not born.
• leadership is a skill that can be learned
• Ultimately, the answer is that both are true: a person can be born with natural leadership
abilities, and someone can learn how to be a good leader at work.
• Many leaders do utilise natural, inherent traits.
• They may have developed key leadership traits via environments they were raised in, or they
may simply possess them naturally.
• For example, you might have come across leaders who are naturally influential. Without even
trying, some leaders are able to inspire others, simply through their demeanour and presence.
• Leadership in public sector is the art of inspiring others to do the right thing, at the right time,
for the benefit of the whole.
• Leadership development is neither new nor unique to the public sector.
• Leadership is a critical component of good public governance,
• Leadership is perhaps one of the most important aspects of management. This is because
leadership is a major factor which contributes immensely to the general wellbeing of
organizations and nations.
• Leadership in public sector is accepted to be an important component of good governance in
general and good public governance in particular.
• Leadership is in essence the heart of good governance.The Organisation for Economic Co-
operation and Development work defines also the role of public leaders as:
• “to solve the problems and challenges faced in a specific environment. When we say we want
more leadership in the public sector, what we are really looking for is people who will promote
institutional adaptations in the public interest. Leadership in this sense is not value-neutral. It is
a positive espousal of the need to promote certain fundamental values that can be called public-
spiritedness. “
• Consequently, leadership is an important and crucial component of good governance that leads
to a superior management level and higher organisational performance which also integrates
efficient human resources management and establishes public service ethics.
• “The earlier definitions identified leadership as a focus of group process and movement,
personality in action. The next type considered it as the art of inducing compliance. The more
recent definitions conceive leadership in terms of influence relationships, power differentials,
persuasion, influence on goal achievement, role differentiation, reinforcement, initiation of
structure, and perceived attributions of behaviour that are consistent with what the perceivers
believe leadership to be. Leadership may involve all these things.”
• The effectiveness of organizational performance of public sector, which can be highly affected
by effective leadership, in developing countries, has been a major concern to the government to
achieve the goal of growth and transformation in all aspects as lack of effectiveness in the areas
of leadership is a common problem in most public service organizations’ of developing
countries.
• Regardless of the sector, leaders need to fulfill certain attributes according to the situation,
environment, and expectations. Being able to choose the right leader or the most successful
education for managers it is essential to understand how leadership preferences differ among
public sector organizations.
• A leader in the public sector has to represent the organization to external interests and
combines the pluralistic interests to one vision. The followers are not only the subordinates, but
also other interests groups as taxpayers, governmental agencies and legislators, who all have
different ideas and expectations of their leader.
Van Wart distinguishes five possible definitions for public leadership:
1. as the process of providing results required by authorized processes in an efficient, effective and legal
manner
2. as the process of supporting followers who provide results
3. as the process of aligning the organization with its environment, especially the macro level changes
necessary, and realigning the culture as appropriate
4. as the service focus
5. as a composite of providing technical performance, internal direction to followers, external
organizational direction –all with a public service orientation.
The core characteristics of public sector leadership?
• Public sector leaders, on the other hand, are impartial, non-partisan, and appointed through
merit-based selection with tenure beyond the life of any particular government.
• Leadership is one of the most important functions of management.
• Leading involves directing, influencing and motivating employees to perform.
• Being a manager largely involves the ability to practice leadership that creates and facilitates
change.
• Leadership is a key to managing organizations in periods of change and crisis and is thus
important to all of us working within organizations.
How does leadership affect organizational change?
• Leadership plays a role in an organization to motivate and encourage the employees to change
in order for the organization to be able to sustain and adapt to the business environment, to
make sure the organization will improve and be innovative.
• Leaders provide the motivation to change and get people involved. They create a sense of
urgency and importance about the change, and show commitment and passion about getting
things done. They offer recognition to those who are participating and doing well.
Key distinction between management and leadership
• Management consists of implementing the vision and direction provided by leaders,
coordinating and staffing the organisation, and handling day-to-day problems.
• The management process involves planning and budgeting, organising and staffing, and
controlling and problem-solving. A manager therefore theoretically (though not always) has an
administrative role within a structure that has subordinates, which they manage so as to
produce order and reduce uncertainty.
• Leadership, on the other hand, can be defined as a process, exercised by an individual or group,
to influence followers towards achieving a common goal. Both leaders and managers make a
valuable contribution to an organisation, in different ways. Managers direct groups and exercise
power over them, whereas leaders create teams and develop power with them.
• Organisations need both leaders and managers. They need leaders to challenge the status quo,
and to inspire and positively influence employees, which is enabled by having managers who
develop and maintain operational stability.
Distinction exists between public sector and political leadership
• Public sector leaders, on the other hand, are impartial, non-partisan, and appointed through
merit-based selection with tenure beyond the life of any particular government.
• Political leaders set policies and manage issues in the jurisdictional interest, whilst public sector
leaders manage the development and implementation of said policies.
• To support the interdependent nature of the relationship, public sector leaders are expected to
give independent, ‘frank and fearless’ advice (MacDermott, 2008) to their political leaders,
adopting a long- term view in the community interest.
• The leadership differences and implications between political and public sector leaders are
profound.
• Political leadership focuses on understanding the electorate, communicating with the public and
maintaining supportive relationships across communities. On the other hand, public sector
leadership is founded on the principle of political neutrality and focuses on the professional and
operational capabilities required to lead organisations.
• A leadership focus also plays an integrating role among various Human Resource Management
components including recruitment and selection, training and development, performance
management, public service ethics, and succession planning.
• Poor leadership and management have a direct impact on other areas of work, the report
findings state that: It can critically impact the loss of funding (72.2%)
• It can majorly affect staff motivation (62.3%)
• There is a 65.2% chance of causing loss of business opportunities to a competitor
The four major factors in leadership within the public sector context?
• All leaders should be in tune with four key factors of leadership: the led, the leader, the
situation and the communication.
• All four factors must always be considerations when exercising leadership, but at different
moments, they affect each other differently
The qualities of a good leader in public service:
• The qualities of effective leadership include courage, strength, the ability to communicate
effectively, knowledge, judgment, integrity, and interpersonal skills.
• A particularly important quality is vision, along with the power to implement that vision.
The factors affecting leadership in public sector?
• Regression model is 0.504. It means that 50.4% of the variation in dependent variable (Factors
affecting Leadership Effectiveness) is explained by variation in all the six independent variables:
Professional skill, Motivation, Commitment, Awareness, Experience and corruption.
The best leadership style in public administration?
• The democratic leadership style is one of the most effective because it encourages everyone to
participate in all processes, share their opinions, and know that you will hear them. It also
encourages employees to be engaged because they know you will hear their feedback.
• Leaders with a democratic style value their colleagues opinions. They open up most decisions
for debate, which help employees feel valued and appreciated
• Consultative:
Process of consultation before decisions are taken.
• Persuasive:
Leader takes decision and seeks to persuade others that the decision is correct.
5 leadership skills that the recruiters might be looking for in you:
1) Self-development:
2) Team development:
3) Strategic management skills:
4) Professional ethics:
5) Creativity:
• In order to function properly and develop good conditions, a state should have an organised and
accountable public administration.
• Such public administration needs professional services, well organised and established
procedures for policy and legislation development, well planned accountability, and clear public
financial management (Donald & James, 2009).
• This is the only way to be able to offer the necessary services and provide for citizens and
businesses in an efficient and effective manner (Pusić, 2002).
• Public administration is the main factor in the proper functioning of the modern state, which is
why a good public administration plays a relevant role in the development and improvement of
the country (Stavileci, 1997).
• Public administration is one of the main segments through which the relations between the
state, civil society and the private sector are realized.
• In this regard, supporting innovations in public administration enables the realization of
development objectives, in particular the economic advantages, poverty reduction, harmony
and institutional stability.
• Public administration is one of the main segments through which the relations between the
state, the civil society, and the private sector are realised (Denters, 2017, p. 91).
• In this regard, supporting innovations in public administration enables the realisation of
development objectives, in particular the economic advantages, poverty reduction, harmony
and institutional stability (Hood & Dixon, 2015).
• Public administration is facing various challenges, including improper regulation, insufficient
capacity, lack of standardisation, unorganised management structures, and lack of regulations
and procedures (Groot & Budding, 2008) as the main ones.
• Public Administration Reform can be very comprehensive and include process changes in areas
such as organisational structures, decentralization, personnel management, public finance,
results-based management, regulatory reforms etc.
• The quality of a country’s public administration and governance is a key factor in its economic
performance and the wellbeing of its citizens.
• Efficient public administrations serve the needs of citizens and businesses. It is essential that
public
• authorities are able to adjust to changing circumstances.
• The public administration reform is designed to change the approach to three key elements of
the executive branch — structures, processes and people. In practice, this means:
• A strong democratic state cannot be built without an efficient public administration system. The
public administration reform is, therefore, an important precondition for European integration.
In its turn, the European Union is supporting the reform at the expert, technical and financial
levels.
• The public administration reform is among the most important tasks for countries with
economies in transition. A lot of important changes required for the economic development,
investment and job creation across the country depend on the ability of the state to develop
and implement efficient public policies.
• Modern public administration is also a key element in building trust in government through the
provision of
• affordable, quality public services, openness and accountability of governmental agencies.
Public Administration in Western Balkans
• Public Administration in WB has become an instrument to provide employment to party
members, family members or potential voters. This has created an administration of a
disproportionate size to its functions and workload, causing a burden on public finances and fails
to provide effective services to the citizenry.
• Current managerial and planning capacities cannot ensure that policies are based on needs
assessments and cost-effect studies.
• A well-functioning state requires an organized, qualified, and accountable public administration.
• Such an administration, in turn, requires a professional civil service, clear procedures for policy
and
• legislative development, a clear framework for accountability, and a sound public financial
management.
• Only then can it efficiently and effectively deliver services to citizens and businesses.
Public Administration in Kosovo
• Public Administration Reform (PAR) is a dynamic process aimed at improving its capacity to
deliver public services.
• Kosovo created its own public administration less than two decades ago, and reforms took place
simultaneously with its institutional building. Along the way, from UNMIK’s interim
administration to the most recent national PAR Strategy, reform could never succeed without
the necessary recourses and willpower. The legal framework has advanced substantially in
recent years, mostly as a result of it being a requirement to implement the Stabilization and
Association Agreement and the European Reform Agenda, but it is rarely respected.
History
• 1999 – 2008, Kosovo was governed by the UN Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo
(UNMIK) that contributed to and had the responsibility of establishing self-government bodies,
organising elections, and transferring responsibilities to local institutions.
• UNMIK made attempts to establish a plan or framework for an effective public administration
based on merits, through several regulations, including the Civil Service Law, Local Government
Law etc.
• These regulations defined the positions and roles or responsibilities of civil servants, the
involvement of politics, and the code of conduct
• In 2017, Kosovo signed a sector reform contract on public administration reform with the
European Commission.
• The purpose of this contract is to support the reform of the public administration in Kosovo in
order to increase the accountability, transparency, and efficiency of the public administration
which, as its most relevant function, is focused on the needs of both citizens and businesses.
• This contract contains eight general indicators of the public administration reform, which the
Government of the Republic of Kosovo agreed to fulfil every year over the next three-year
period, in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively.
• The public administration in Kosovo is still struggling to fulfil its function, since political factors,
financial capacity, human resources, and the legacy have an important role in the development
and change of the public administration.
• As the main employer in Kosovo, with around 80,000 people on the payroll (Balkans Group
Policy Report,
• 2019), it has a huge number of employees.
• The data by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development show and prove that
the public administration in Kosovo is the largest of all the other Western Balkan countries, i.e.
with the highest percentage of total employment at 30.81%, whereas North Macedonia has the
lowest share with 22.79% (OECD, 2020).
• Progress reports of the European Commission emphasised that politicised administration
hinders the reforms in the public administration. On the other hand, the financial factor also
plays an important role in the reforming process.
• Although the EU provides financial assistance for the reforms of the public administration,
Kosovo needs more professional capacities to implement the reforms and policies. The financial
factor contributes to delaying the reforms as the budget capacities are limited.
• One of Kosovo’s main goals is to reform and build administrative capacities at the level of
European Union standards, as this is a criterion established by the EU for advancing on its
accession route to the European Union, which also represent a challenge for the institutions of
Kosovo striving to fulfil the criteria set by the EU (Bieber, 2011).
• The legislation of Kosovo should be harmonised with the legal basis of the EU,
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM STRATEGY 2022-2027
• Public Administration Reform Strategy (PARS) 2022 - 2027 is a strategic document of the
Government of the Republic of Kosovo that sets out objectives and guidelines for the
development and modernization of public administration over the next five (5) years.
• The document focuses on the responsibilities and administrative duties of the Government and
the state administration under the leadership, control and supervision of the Government.
• This 6 involves any segment of state administration, affected by legislation (e.g. administrative
procedures and service delivery, civil service system, access to information, public sector salary
system, etc.). This document also targets such administrative duties and responsibilities, while
recognizing the autonomy of local administration
• The vision of the PAR Strategy is a modern public administration that serves the public interest,
meets the needs of citizens and businesses, and successfully completes the EU membership
process, supporting democracy and the rule of law.
The scope of PARS is summarized into 4 priority areas:
(a) Policy Planning and Coordination;
(b) Service delivery;
(c) Public Service and Human Resource Management (HRM);
(d) Accountability and transparency.
Principles of public sector reforms
Administrative reform
• Britannica defines civil society as a ‘dense network of groups, communities, networks, and ties
that stand between the individual and the modern state.’
• These groups may include sports clubs, charities, indigenous groups, non-profit organizations,
faith-based organizations, foundations, professional associations, and more. Well-known
examples include the Red Cross, Rotary Clubs, the Salvation Army, Amnesty International, and
Wildlife Warriors.
• Civil society groups help to bring about the interests of citizens and individuals, but tend to act
independently of government institutions and businesses.
• But even though civil society acts independently of government institutions, many civil society
organizations regularly interact with governments and their representatives. In fact, we’ve
identified at least ten ways that civil society organizations typically engage with the government:
• “the wide array of non-governmental and not-for-profit organizations that have a presence in
public life, expressing the interests and values of their members or others, based on ethical,
cultural, political, scientific, religious or philanthropic considerations.
• Civil society has grown in size and importance around the world.
• A vibrant civil society can ensure that millions of vulnerable people have a voice and that they
play a central role in the struggle to further political, social, economic and constitutional rights.
• Civil society can identify and raise issues around which collective problem-solving needs to take
place.
• Civil society organizations (CSOs) also play an essential role in contexts of state service reduction
or lack of services, particularly in countries of protracted crisis.
Why is civil society important?
Among the many areas civil society focuses on and among the different functions it serves,
strengthening democracy and contributing to development are the most crucial.
In particular, civil society and civil society organisations make their key contribution to development and
democratization processes by:
• delivering basic services, such as primary education, health, water and sanitation, and providing
shelter, counselling and support services to disadvantaged groups.
• demanding efficient public services to the relative authorities
• promoting political participation
• monitoring the performance of government and other stakeholders in the provision of services
and by holding them accountable for their work
• participating in local planning and budgeting
• advocating for human rights, for the needs and priorities of their constituency (especially of
marginalized groups) and advocating against government deficiencies
• contributing to mediating and resolving conflict, contribute to social innovation
• influencing government policy and lobbying for change
• contributing to social innovation
Civil Society – Government Policy
• Civil society groups are often involved in shaping government policy, programs, and strategy
through consultation, discussions, and public hearings, with organizations often representing
the interests of a broader group of stakeholders.
Promoting Accountability and Transparency in Public Administration
• Civil society plays an important role in holding governments to account — from
monitoring government actions to publicly calling them out with reports that highlight
potential issues.
• For example, the Global Partnership for Social Accountability (GPSA) provides grants
that facilitate ‘collaboration of civil society organizations with governments, and
engagement of citizens in joint, iterative problem solving in order to solve development
problems,
• strengthen accountability and improve sector governance.’ One of
• their projects involved citizen monitoring to improve transparency and accountability of
licensing and revenue management in the Indonesian mining sector.
• Civil society organizations provide citizens with knowledge crucial to political participation, such
as the obligations and rights of citizens with regard to government processes, different types of
political issues and policy agendas, ways in which citizens can collaborate to address societal
issues, and approaches to creating meaningful change in communities
CIVIL SOCIETY – PUBLIC SECTOR
• Civil society can be the main pillar in controlling government policy. A free and responsible press
will provide actual and factual information. Civil society as citizens those who have rights and
freedoms must also be guaranteed and maintained.
• A good citizen must show inclusiveness or openness to other citizens of the country and do not
let the will of a group of people be imposed on one person or group of other people so as to
result in the denial of the principles of civil society. In addition, it is also necessary to pay
attention to and maintain the principle of independence of civil society which is often placed in
a position that is contrary to the concept of state power.
• This certainly has implications for state officials' suspicion of the existence of civil society who
only want a common relationship between citizens with values such as mutual respect, respect
and building harmonious relationships.
• It can be said that democracy is a system of government that originates from the people by
mandating power and authority to the community through participation forms and mechanisms.
• Public participation is fundamental in democratic governance because it is the main condition in
running its government.
• civil society can simultaneously strengthen other institutional roles. Therefore strengthening the
role of civil society is important because of its position as stakeholders as well as beneficiaries of
services.
• There are several views on the role of civil society as a pillar that can be carried out in
encouraging the realization of good public services, namely as follows:
• First, the role of civil society in monitoring. The implementation of public services so far includes
identified advocacy and supervision in the form of dialogue catalysts, balancing interests,
providing signals, and mobilizing for collective action.
• The role of civil society as a catalyst is carried out by means of a dialogue instrument between
policy makers, service providers and the community as the subject and object of policy.
• This dialogue is usually carried out to reach consensus or mutual agreement between the
government, the community and other stakeholders to formulate and create a role model for
implementing policies.
• Second, strengthening the role of civil society in conducting outreach and consultation. This
strengthening is focused on building a legal framework and public policy. Forms of advocacy
include fighting for the aspirations and interests of the public when the formulation of public
policies in the form of laws, central and regional government regulations are implemented. In
this case, civil society acts as a specific and independent source of expertise and knowledge for
the bureaucracy. Meanwhile, from the consultation side, civil society plays a role as a catalyst
for the process of sharing knowledge and conducting trainings.
• Third, become a source of new ideas or innovative thoughts for the improvement of public
services. This innovative idea can be extracted from a wealth of local knowledge as well as from
the experiences of success in other countries.
• Relations between government and CSOs vary greatly depending on levels of democratization.
• Non-democratic governments are generally suspicious of and show little tolerance for
independent non-governmental organizatons (NGOs).
• They introduce laws and rules aimed at control rather than regulations.
•