0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views

The-Open-Economy

Chapter 6 of Mankiw's Macroeconomics discusses the dynamics of an open economy, focusing on the relationship between GDP, consumption, investment, government spending, and net exports. It introduces the national income identity for open economies and explores the implications of trade balances and capital flows. The chapter also examines the effects of fiscal policies and external factors on saving, investment, and net exports.

Uploaded by

raslen gharssa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views

The-Open-Economy

Chapter 6 of Mankiw's Macroeconomics discusses the dynamics of an open economy, focusing on the relationship between GDP, consumption, investment, government spending, and net exports. It introduces the national income identity for open economies and explores the implications of trade balances and capital flows. The chapter also examines the effects of fiscal policies and external factors on saving, investment, and net exports.

Uploaded by

raslen gharssa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 91

The Open Economy

Chapter 6 of Macroeconomics, 8th


edition, by N. Gregory Mankiw
ECO62 Udayan Roy
Chapter Outline
• In chapter 2, we saw that Y = C + I + G + NX
when Y, C, I, G, and NX are interpreted as data
• In chapter 3, we saw
– a long-run theory of Y and
– a long-run theory of how Y is split between C, I,
and G in a closed economy
• In this chapter, we will see
– a long-run theory of how Y is split between C, I, G
and NX in an open economy
Recap of Chapter 3
• We begin by rehashing the closed economy
theories of chapter 3
GDP in the long run: assumptions
• K and L are exogenous
K, L, F(K, L) Y
• Y is endogenous
• Therefore, the production function
Y = F(K, L) completes the theory of Predictions Grid
GDP in the long run GDP, Y
Capital, K +
Labor, L +
• Example: Suppose F(K, L) = 5K0.3L0.7. Technology +
If K = 2 and L = 10, then Y = 30.85.
Consumption, C
• Net Taxes = Tax Revenue – Transfer Payments
– Denoted T and always assumed exogenous
• Disposable income (or, after-tax income) is total
income minus total net taxes: Y – T.
• Assumption: Consumption expenditure is directly
related to disposable income
Predictions Grid
Y C
Capital, K + +
Labor, L + +
Technology + +
Taxes, T −
Consumption, C
• Assumption: Consumption expenditure
is directly related to disposable income
• Consumption function: C = C (Y – T )
• Specifically, C = Co + Cy✕(Y – T)
• Co represents all other exogenous
variables that affect consumption, such Predictions Grid
as asset prices, consumer optimism,
etc. Y C
Capital, K + +
• Cy is the marginal propensity to Labor, L + +
consume (MPC), the fraction of every
additional dollar of income that is Technology + +
consumed Taxes, T −
Co +
Consumption: example
• Suppose F(K, L) = 5K0.3L0.7 and K = 2 and L = 10.
Then Y = 30.85.
• Suppose T = 0.85. Therefore, disposable
income is Y – T = 30.
Private Saving is defined
• Now, suppose C = 2 + 0.8(Y – T). as disposable income –
consumption, which is Y –
• Then, C = 2 + 0.8 ✕ 30 = 26 T – C = 30 – 26 = 4.

K, L, F(K, L) Y
C
C(Y – T), T
Marginal Propensity to Consume
• The marginal propensity to consume is a
positive fraction (1 < MPC < 0)
• That is, when income (Y) increases,
consumption (C) also increases, but by only a
fraction of the increase in income.
• Therefore, Y↑⇒ C↑ and Y – C↑
• Similarly, Y↓⇒ C↓ and Y – C↓ Predictions Grid
Y C Y–C
K, L, Technology + + +
Taxes, T − +
Co + −
Government Spending
• Assumption: government spending (G) is
exogenous
• Public Saving is defined as the net tax revenue
of the government minus government
spending, which is T – G
In an open economy,
• spending need not equal output
• saving need not equal investment
Preliminaries
superscripts:
d = spending on
domestic goods
f = spending on
foreign goods

EX = exports =
foreign spending on domestic goods
IM = imports = C f + I f + G f
= spending on foreign goods
NX = net exports (a.k.a. the “trade balance”)
= EX – IM
GDP = expenditure on
domestically produced g & s
The national income identity
in an open economy

Y = C + I + G + NX

or, NX = Y – (C + I + G )

domestic
spending
net exports
output
Trade surpluses and deficits

NX = EX – IM = Y – (C + I + G )

• trade surplus:
output > spending and exports > imports
Size of the trade surplus = NX
• trade deficit:
spending > output and imports > exports
Size of the trade deficit = –NX
International capital flows
• Net capital outflow
=S – I
= net outflow of “loanable funds”
= net purchases of foreign assets
the country’s purchases of foreign assets
minus foreign purchases of domestic assets

• When S > I, country is a net lender


• When S < I, country is a net borrower
The link between trade & cap. flows

NX = Y – (C + I + G )
implies
NX = (Y – C – G ) – I
= S – I
trade balance = net capital outflow

Thus,
a country with a trade deficit (NX < 0)
is a net borrower (S < I ).
Saving – Investment = Net Exports
• In chapter 2, we saw that Y = C + I + G + NX
• Therefore, Y − C − G − I = NX
• In Ch. 3, Y − C − G was defined as national saving
(S)
• Therefore, S − I = NX

• But in Chs. 3 and 4, we had assumed a closed


economy (that is, NX = 0)
• Consequently, we had S = I
• That’s no longer true in an open economy
Saving, investment, and the trade balance (percent of GDP)
1960-2007

investment

saving

trade balance
(right scale)
U.S.: “The world’s largest debtor nation”
• Every year since 1980s: huge trade deficits and
net capital inflows, i.e. net borrowing from abroad
• As of 12/31/2008:
– U.S. residents owned $19.9 trillion worth of
foreign assets
– Foreigners owned $23.4 trillion worth of
U.S. assets
– U.S. net indebtedness to rest of the world:
$3.5 trillion--higher than any other country, hence
U.S. is the “world’s largest debtor nation”
Saving: how do we calculate it?
• S=Y−C−G
• S = Y − C(Y – T) − G
• S = Y − C0 − Cy✕(Y – T) − G

G
K, L, F(K, L) Y S=Y–C–G
C
C(Y – T), T
Saving: example
• Suppose F(K, L) = 5K0.3L0.7 and K = 2 and L = 10.
Then Y = 30.85.
• Suppose T = 0.85. Therefore, disposable
income is Y – T = 30.
Public Saving = T – G
• Now, suppose C = 2 + 0.8 ✕(Y – T).= 0.85 – 3 = –2.15
• Then, C = 2 + 0.8 ✕ 30 = 26
• Suppose G = 3
• Then, S = Y – C – G = 30.85 – 26 – 3 = 1.85
Saving: Predictions
Predictions Grid Predictions Grid
Y C Y–C Y C Y–C Y–C–G
K, L, Technology + + + K, L, Technology + + + +
Taxes, T − + Taxes, T − + +
Co + − Co + − −
Govt, G −

Predictions Grid
Y C S
K, L, Technology + + +
Taxes, T − +
Co + −
Govt, G −
Chapter 3 Recap

Predictions Grid
Y C S
K, L, A (Technology) + + +
Net Taxes, T − +
Co + −
Now for the new stuff!
Govt Spending, G −
Perfect Capital Mobility
• Assumption: people are free to lend to or
borrow from anyone anywhere in the world
• Assumption: lending to foreign borrowers is
in no way different from lending to domestic
borrowers

• The real interest rate is r for domestic loans


and r* for loans to foreigners
• Our two assumptions imply r = r*
Real Interest Rate: predictions
• Our assumption of perfect capital mobility
implies that real interest rates will be the
same both at home and abroad: r = r*
• Further, the foreign real interest rate is
assumed exogenous
• Therefore, we already have a complete (and
trivial!) theory of the domestic real interest
rate Predictions Grid
r
*
r r
r* +
“Small Country”
• The assumption that the foreign real interest
(r*) rate is exogenous and that it determines
the domestic real interest rate (r = r*)
represents the idea that the domestic
economy is affected by the foreign economy
and is unable to affect the foreign economy
• In other words, we assume that the domestic
economy is a “small country”
The Real Interest Rate: predictions
• r = r* Predictions Grid
Y C S r
K, L, Technology + + +
Taxes, T − +
Co + −
Govt, G −
r* +
Investment and the real interest rate
• Assumption: investment spending is inversely
related to the real interest rate
• I = I(r), such that r↑⇒ I↓
r

r* r
I
I(r)

I (r )

I
Investment and the real interest rate
r Investment is still a
downward-sloping function
of the interest rate,
but the exogenous
world interest rate…
r*
…determines the
country’s level of
investment.
I (r )

I (r* ) I
Investment and the real interest rate
r
• Algebraically, I = Io −
I rr
r*B Io2 − Irr
– Here Ir is the effect of
r on I and r*A
Io1 − Irr
– Io represents all other
factors that also affect I
business investment
spending
• such as business
optimism,
technological progress,
etc.
Investment: example
• Suppose r* = 7 percent
• Then, r = r* = 7 percent
• Suppose I = 16 – 2r is the investment function
• Then, I = 16 – 2 ✕ 7 = 2

r* r
I
I(r)
Investment: predictions
• I = Io − Irr = Io − Irr* Predictions Grid
Y C S r I
– Note that this expresses K, L, Technology + + +
investment (which is Taxes, T − +
endogenous) entirely in Co + −
terms of an exogenous Govt, G −
variable (r*) and two r* + −
parameters (Io and Ir) Io +
– So, this tells us all we
can say about
investment spending
Net Exports: predictions
Predictions Grid
• We saw earlier that Y C S r I NX
NX = S – I K, L, Technology + + + +
Taxes, T − + +
• So, we can predict
Co + − −
changes in net Govt, G − −
exports (NX) from r* + − +
Io + −
what we already
know about saving (S)
and investment (I)
NX = S – I
• So far, we have seen how to calculate saving
(S) and investment (I)
• The difference gives us net exports: NX = S – I

r* r
I
I(r)
NX = S – I
G
K, L, F(K, L) Y S=Y–C–G
C
C(Y – T), T
Net Exports: example
• Suppose F(K, L) = 5K0.3L0.7 and K = 2 and L = 10.
Then Y = 30.85. Suppose T = 0.85. Therefore,
disposable income is Y – T = 30.
• Now, suppose C = 2 + 0.8(Y – T). Then, C = 2 + 0.8
✕ 30 = 26
• Suppose G = 3. Then, S = Y – C – G = 30.85 – 26 – 3
= 1.85
• Suppose r* = 7 percent. Then, r = r* = 7 percent.
Suppose I = 16 – 2r is the investment function.
Then, I = 16 – 2 ✕ 7 = 2
• Then NX = S – I = 1.85 – 2 = – 0.15
The Story So Far

Predictions Grid
Y C S r I NX
K, L, Technology + + + +
Taxes, T − + +
Co + − −
Govt, G − −
r* + − +
Io + −
If the economy were closed…
r
…the interest
rate would
adjust to
equate
investment
and saving: rc

I (r )

S, I
But in a small open economy…
r
the exogenous
world interest
rate determines
investment… NX
r*
…and the
difference rc
between saving
and investment I (r )
determines net
capital outflow I1 S, I
and net exports
Next, four experiments:
1. Fiscal policy at Predictions Grid
Y C S r I NX
home (G and T) K, L, Technology + + + +
Taxes, T − + +
2. Fiscal policy abroad Co + − −
(r*) Govt, G − −
r* + − +
3. An increase in Io + −
investment
demand (Io)
4. Trade restrictions
1. Fiscal policy at home
r
An increase in G
or decrease in T NX2
reduces saving.

NX1
Results:

I (r )

I1 S, I
NX and the federal budget deficit
(% of GDP), 1965-2009
8%
Budget deficit 2%
6% (left scale)

4% 0%

2%
-2%

0%

-4%
-2% Net exports
(right scale)
-4% -6%
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
2. Fiscal policy abroad
r
Expansionary
NX2
fiscal policy
abroad raises
NX1
the world
interest rate.

Results:
I (r )

S, I
NOW YOU TRY:
3. An increase in investment demand
r
Use the S
model to
determine
the impact of
an increase
NX1
in investment
demand on
NX, S, I, and I (r )1
net capital
outflow. I1 S, I
ANSWERS:
3. An increase in investment demand
r
S
ΔI > 0, NX2
ΔS = 0,
net capital
outflow and
NX fall NX1
by the I (r )2
amount ΔI
I (r )1

I1 I2 S, I
Nominal and Real

EXCHANGE RATES
The nominal exchange rate

e = nominal exchange rate,


the relative price of
domestic currency
in terms of foreign currency
(e.g. Yen per Dollar)
A few exchange rates, as of 6/24/2009

country exchange rate


Euro area 0.72 Euro/$
Indonesia 10,337 Rupiahs/$
Japan 95.9 Yen/$
Mexico 13.3 Pesos/$
Russia 31.4 Rubles/$
South Africa 8.1 Rand/$
U.K. 0.61 Pounds/$
The real exchange rate

ε= real exchange rate,


the relative price of
the lowercase domestic goods
Greek letter
epsilon
in terms of foreign goods
(e.g. Japanese Big Macs per U.S.
Big Mac)
~ McZample ~
• Big Mac
• price in Japan:
P* = 200 Yen
• price in USA:
P = $4.00
• nominal exchange rate
e = 100 Yen/$ To buy a U.S. Big Mac,
someone from Japan
would have to pay an
amount that could buy
2 Japanese Big Macs.
Understanding the units of ε
ε
ε in the real world & our model
• In the real world:
We can think of ε as the relative price of
a basket of domestic goods in terms of a
basket of foreign goods
• In our macro model:
There’s just one good, “output.”
So ε is the relative price of one country’s
output in terms of the other country’s output
Purchasing Power Parity
• This is the simplest theory of the real
exchange rate ε

• PPP assumption: ε = 1 ε=1


NX

• That’s it! NX

• The PPP assumption is also called the Law of


One Price (LOOP)
Purchasing Power Parity
• Nothing can Predictions Grid (PPP)
affect the real Y C S r I NX ε

exchange rate, K, L, Technology + + + +


Taxes, T − + +
under PPP Co + − −
• because it is Govt, G − −
r* + − +
always ε = 1 Io + −
under PPP
PPP is too easy! Besides the facts do not
give it much support. So, next comes a
more sophisticated theory of the real
exchange rate.
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)
Two definitions:
– A doctrine that states that goods must sell at the
same (currency-adjusted) price in all countries.
– The nominal exchange rate adjusts to equalize the
cost of a basket of goods across countries.
Reasoning:
– arbitrage, the law of one price
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)

• PPP: e ×P = P* Cost of a basket of


foreign goods, in
foreign currency.

Cost of a basket of Cost of a basket of


domestic goods, in domestic goods, in
foreign currency. domestic currency.

▪ Solve for e : e = P*/ P


▪ PPP implies that the nominal exchange rate
between two countries equals the ratio of the
countries’ price levels.
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)
• If e = P*/P,
then

and the NX curve is horizontal:


ε
S −I Under PPP,
changes in
(S – I ) have no
ε =1 NX impact on ε or e.

NX
Does PPP hold in the real world?
No, for two reasons:
1. International arbitrage not possible.
• nontraded goods
• transportation costs
2. Different countries’ goods not perfect substitutes.

Yet, PPP is a useful theory:


– It’s simple & intuitive.
– In the real world, nominal exchange rates
tend toward their PPP values over the long run.
How NX depends on ε: approach 2

↑ε ⇒ U.S. goods become more expensive


relative to foreign goods
⇒ ↓EX, ↑IM
⇒ ↓NX
The NX curve for the U.S.
ε

so U.S. net
When ε is exports will
relatively low, be high
U.S. goods are
relatively ε1
inexpensive
NX (ε)
0 NX
NX(ε1)
The NX curve for the U.S.
ε At high enough
values of ε,
ε2 U.S. goods become
so expensive that
we export
less than
we import

NX (ε)

NX(ε2) 0 NX
U.S. net exports and the real exchange rate, 1973-2009
4% Trade-weighted real 140
exchange rate index
2% 120

Index (March 1973 = 100)


100
0%
NX (% of GDP)

80
-2%
60
-4%
40
Net exports
-6% (left scale) 20

-8% 0
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
The Net Exports Function
• The net exports function reflects this inverse
relationship between NX and ε :
NX = NX(ε )
The Net Exports Function
• NX = NX(ε)

• Specific form: NX = NXo – NXεε


– Here, NXo represents all factors—other than the
real exchange rate—that also affect net exports
• Examples: preferences, tariffs and other trade policy
variables, foreign GDP, etc.

• Example: NX = 19.85 – 2ε
Net Exports: calculation
• We just saw that NX = NXo – NXεε
• Therefore, NXεε = NXo – NX
• Therefore, ε = (NXo – NX)/NXε
– In our numerical example, NX = –0.15 was shown
earlier
– Suppose NX = 19.85 – 2ε, as in the previous slide.
Then, NXo = 19.85 and NXε = 2
– Therefore, ε = (19.85 – (–0.15))/2 = 10 (Yeay!)
The Story So Far
Predictions Grid

Y C S r I NX ε
K, L, Technology + + + + −
Taxes, T − + + −
Co + − − +
Govt, G − − +
r* + − + −
Io + − +
NXo +
Real Exchange Rate: example
• Suppose F(K, L) = 5K0.3L0.7 and K = 2 and L = 10. Then Y
= 30.85. Suppose T = 0.85. Therefore, disposable
income is Y – T = 30.
• Suppose C = 2 + 0.8(Y – T). Then, C = 2 + 0.8 ✕ 30 = 26
• Suppose G = 3. Then, S = Y – C – G = 30.85 – 26 – 3 =
1.85
• Suppose r* = 7 percent. Then, r = r* = 7 percent.
Suppose I = 16 – 2r is the investment function. Then, I
= 16 – 2 ✕ 7 = 2
• Then NX = S – I = 1.85 – 2 = – 0.15
• As NX = 19.85 – 2ε is the net exports function, we get
NX = 19.85 – 2ε = – 0.15.
• Therefore, ε = 10
Real Exchange Rate: calculation

r* r NX(ε)
I
I(r)
NX = S − I
G
K, L, F(K, L) Y S=Y–C–G
C
C(Y – T), T
How ε is determined
• The accounting identity says NX = S – I
• We saw earlier how S – I is determined:
– S depends on domestic factors (output, fiscal
policy variables, etc)
– I is determined by the world interest
rate r *
• So, ε must adjust to ensure
How ε is determined
Neither S nor I
depend on ε, ε
so the net capital
outflow curve is
vertical.

ε1
ε adjusts to
equate NX NX(ε )
with net capital
outflow, S − I. NX
NX 1
Interpretation: supply and demand
in the foreign exchange market

demand:
ε
Foreigners need
dollars to buy U.S.
net exports.

supply: ε1
Net capital
outflow (S − I ) NX(ε )
is the supply of
NX
dollars to be NX 1
invested abroad.
Real Exchange Rate: predictions
• As net exports Predictions Grid
(NX) and the real Y C S r I NX ε
exchange rate (ε) K, L, Technology + + + + −
are inversely Taxes, T − + + −
related, the NX Co + − − +
and ε columns
Govt, G − − +
are opposites
r* + − + −
• Note that an
Io + − +
increase in the
net exports NXo +
function has no
effect on net
exports
Next, four experiments:
1. Fiscal policy at home Predictions Grid

(G and T) Y C S r I NX ε
K, L, Technology + + + + −
2. Fiscal policy abroad (r*) Taxes, T − + + −
Co + − − +
3. An increase in
Govt, G − − +
investment demand
r* + − + −
(Io)
Io + − +
4. Trade policy to restrict NXo +
imports (NXo)
1. Fiscal policy at home

A fiscal expansion
reduces national ε
saving, net capital
outflow, and the ε2
supply of dollars
in the foreign
exchange market… ε1

NX(ε )
…causing the real
NX
exchange rate to rise NX 2 NX 1
and NX to fall.
2. Fiscal policy abroad
An increase in r*
reduces
ε
investment,
increasing net
capital outflow and ε1
the supply of
dollars in the
foreign exchange ε2
market…
NX(ε )

…causing the real NX


NX 1 NX 2
exchange rate to fall
and NX to rise.
NOW YOU TRY:
3. Increase in investment demand

Determine the ε
impact of an
increase in
investment
demand on
net exports, ε1
net capital
outflow,
NX(ε )
and the real NX
exchange rate NX 1
ANSWERS:
3. Increase in investment demand
An increase in
investment ε
reduces net
capital outflow ε2
and the supply
of dollars in the
foreign ε1
exchange
market… NX(ε )

…causing the real NX


NX 2 NX 1
exchange rate to rise
and NX to fall.
4. Trade policy to restrict imports

At any given value of ε,


an import quota ε
⇒ ↓IM ⇒ ↑NX
⇒ demand for ε2
dollars shifts
right ε 1
NX (ε )2
Trade policy doesn’t
NX (ε )1
affect S or I , so capital
flows and the supply of NX
NX1
dollars remain fixed.
4. Trade policy to restrict imports

Results:
Δε > 0 ε
(demand
increase) ε2
ΔNX = 0
(supply fixed) ε1
ΔIM < 0 NX (ε )2
(policy)
NX (ε )1
ΔEX < 0
(rise in ε ) NX
NX1
Nominal interest rate, inflation rate, price level

NOMINAL VARIABLES: OPEN


ECONOMY
Chapter 5 is still applicable!
• Go back to Chapter 5 and review the steps in
the calculations for the long-run values of the
nominal variables i, π, and P.
• You will notice that at no point was it assumed
that the economy is closed (NX = 0)
• Therefore, the results of Chapter 5 are true for
open economies
Chapter 5 Results—true for an open
economy also

Predictions Grid (Long Run, Open Economy)


Y C S r I NX ε π i P
K, L, Technology + + + + − −
Taxes, T − + + −
Co + − − +
Govt, G − − +
r* + − + − + +
Io + − +
NXo +
M g − Yg + + +
M +
The Nominal Exchange Rate
• Recall that the real exchange rate is

▪ Therefore, the nominal exchange rate is


The Nominal Exchange Rate:
predictions
• ε = eP/P* Predictions Grid (Long Run, Open Economy)
Y C S r I NX ε π i P e
• εP */P = e K, L, Technology + + + + − − ?
Taxes, T − + + − −
Co + − − + +
Govt, G − − + +
r* + − + − + + −
Io + − + +
NXo + +
M g − Yg + + + −
M + −
The Nominal Exchange Rate, Growth
Rate
• e = εP */P
• Recall from chapter 2
– Z = XY implies Zg = Xg + Yg
– Z = X/Y implies Zg = Xg − Yg
• e = εP */P implies eg = εg + π* − π
• Assumption: the real exchange rate is
constant in the long run: εg = 0
• Therefore, eg = π* − π
The Nominal Exchange Rate , Growth
Rate
• eg = π * − π
• The value of the domestic currency grows at a
rate equal to the foreign inflation rate minus
the domestic inflation rate
– Example: if China’s annual inflation rate is 8
percent and the U.S. annual inflation rate is 2
percent, then the yuan per dollar exchange rate
will increase at the annual rate of 6 percent.
Nominal Exchange Rates: predictions
• eg = π * − π Predictions Grid (Long Run, Open Economy)
• Assumption: Y C S r I NX ε π i P e eg
The foreign K, L, Technology + + + + − − ?
inflation Taxes, T − + + − −
rate (π*) is Co + − − + +
exogenous Govt, G − − + +
r* + − + − + + −
Io + − + +
NXo + +
M g − Yg + + + − −
M + −
π* +
Long-Run Predictions—Open Economy

Predictions Grid (Long Run, Open Economy)


Y C S r I NX ε π i P e eg
K, L, Technology + + + + − − ?
Taxes, T − + + − −
Co + − − + +
Govt, G − − + +
r* + − + − + + −
Io + − + +
NXo + +
M g − Yg + + + − −
M + −
π* +
Inflation differentials and nominal exchange rates for a cross
section of countries
% change
in nominal Mexico
exchange
rate
Iceland

Pakistan
Australia S. Africa
Canada S. Korea
Singapore
U.K.
Japan

inflation differential
CASE STUDY:
The Reagan deficits revisited
actual closed small open
1970s 1980s
change economy economy
G–T 2.2 3.9 ↑ ↑ ↑
S 19.6 17.4 ↓ ↓ ↓
r 1.1 6.3 ↑ ↑ no change
I 19.9 19.4 ↓ ↓ no change
NX -0.3 -2.0 ↓ no change ↓
ε 115.1 129.4 ↑ no change ↑
Data: decade averages; all except r and ε are expressed as a percent of GDP;
ε is a trade-weighted index.
The U.S. as a large open economy
• So far, we’ve learned long-run models for
two extreme cases:
– closed economy (chap. 3)
– small open economy (chap. 5)
• A large open economy – like the U.S. – falls
between these two extremes.
• The results from large open economy analysis
are a mixture of the results for the
closed & small open economy cases.
• For example…
A fiscal expansion in three models
A fiscal expansion causes national saving to fall.
The effects of this depend on openness & size:
closed large open small open
economy economy economy
rises, but not as much no
r rises
as in closed economy change
falls, but not as much no
I falls
as in closed economy change
no falls, but not as much as in
NX falls
change small open economy

You might also like