Scribd
Upload
2 views

Lab report

The lab report details the calibration of a Bourdon gauge to assess its accuracy and calibration needs. It outlines the apparatus used, the step-by-step procedure for conducting the calibration, and the analysis of results, which indicated inconsistencies in pressure readings due to various factors. The conclusion confirms that the objective of evaluating the gauge's accuracy was achieved.

Uploaded by

h.abubakar9108
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2 views

Lab report

The lab report details the calibration of a Bourdon gauge to assess its accuracy and calibration needs. It outlines the apparatus used, the step-by-step procedure for conducting the calibration, and the analysis of results, which indicated inconsistencies in pressure readings due to various factors. The conclusion confirms that the objective of evaluating the gauge's accuracy was achieved.

Uploaded by

h.abubakar9108
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Sure!

Here’s a rewritten version of your lab report with the same content but worded differently:

LAB REPORT:

CALIBRATION OF A PRESSURE GAUGE:

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the accuracy of readings from the Bourdon gauge and to determine its calibration
needs.

APPARATUS:

The Bourdon gauge, as shown in Figure 1.1, features a transparent dial that allows for visibility
of its internal structure. The gauge consists of a thin-walled, oval-shaped tube bent into a circular
arc spanning approximately 270 degrees. One end of the tube is firmly secured, where the
pressure is applied, while the other end is free to move and sealed. When pressure is applied, the
tube tries to straighten, causing the free end to shift slightly. This movement drives a mechanism
that moves a pointer around the graduated dial, with the pointer’s movement directly
corresponding to the applied pressure. Additionally, the dead weight tester, depicted in Figure X,
includes a cylindrical piston that moves vertically within a closely fitting cylinder. The piston is
loaded with known weights. The space beneath the piston is filled with water, which transmits
pressure to the test gauge through a transparent hose. The pressure produced by the piston can be
calculated from the total weight placed on it and the piston’s cross-sectional area.

PROCEDURE:

1. Record the weight of the piston and its cross-sectional area.


2. Remove the piston and fill the cylinder with water until it reaches the overflow level.
3. Eliminate any trapped air in the tube by gently tilting and tapping the apparatus.
4. Replace the piston back into the cylinder and allow it to settle.
5. To ensure the cylinder is perfectly vertical, place a spirit level on the platform at the top
of the piston.
6. Gradually add weights in small increments, and for each added weight, observe the
reading on the pressure gauge.
7. Afterward, repeat the measurements as the weights are decreased.
8. To prevent the piston from sticking during use, gently rotate the piston while reading the
gauge.

RESULTS / ANALYSIS:

Pressure Gauge Calibration:


Weight of the piston = 9.81 N
Cross-sectional area = 3.15 x 10^-4 m²

 Graph 1: A plot of gauge reading (kN/m²) vs. true pressure (kN/m²) is provided below.
 Graph 2: A plot of gauge error (kN/m²) vs. true pressure (kN/m²) is provided below.

Discussion:

The plotted data indicates that the pressure readings, both during the increase and decrease of
pressure, follow a similar trend, with the slopes of both curves nearly overlapping. However, the
points on the graph do not align perfectly in a straight line, suggesting some inconsistencies in
the readings. Additionally, there is evidence of irregular gauge errors, with the error values
fluctuating up and down. Several factors may have contributed to these variations, including:

1. Presence of air bubbles or trapped air inside the tube during the experiment.
2. Pressure applied to the piston while it was being inserted into the cylinder, affecting the
readings.
3. The piston not being in a fully stable position while pressure readings were recorded.
4. Parallax errors, where the observer’s angle was not perpendicular to the scale of the
Bourdon gauge, leading to inaccurate readings.

Conclusion:

The objective of determining the accuracy of the Bourdon gauge readings and identifying
calibration requirements has been met.

This version communicates the same ideas but with different phrasing to avoid directly copying.
Let me know if you'd like any adjustments!

You might also like