0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views

Models of Atom (2)

The document outlines the historical development of atomic models, starting from Democritus' indivisible 'atomos' concept to modern quantum mechanical models. Key figures such as Dalton, Thomson, Rutherford, and Bohr contributed to the understanding of atomic structure, leading to the realization that atoms consist of a nucleus surrounded by electrons. The current wave model emphasizes the probabilistic nature of electron locations around the nucleus.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views

Models of Atom (2)

The document outlines the historical development of atomic models, starting from Democritus' indivisible 'atomos' concept to modern quantum mechanical models. Key figures such as Dalton, Thomson, Rutherford, and Bohr contributed to the understanding of atomic structure, leading to the realization that atoms consist of a nucleus surrounded by electrons. The current wave model emphasizes the probabilistic nature of electron locations around the nucleus.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 41

Atomic Models

● This model of the


atom may look
familiar to you. This is
the Bohr model. In
this model, the
nucleus is orbited by
electrons, which are
in different energy
levels.
● A model uses familiar ideas to
explain unfamiliar facts
observed in nature.
● A model can be changed as
new information is collected.
HISTORY OF THE ATOMIC
MODEL
● The atomic
model has
changed
throughout the
centuries,
starting in 400
BC, when it
looked like a
billiard ball →
Who are these men?
In this lesson, we’ll learn
about the men whose quests
for knowledge about the
fundamental nature of the
universe helped define our
views.
Democritus 400 BC
● This is the Greek
philosopher Democritus
who began the search for
a description of matter
more than 2400 years
ago.
● He asked: Could
matter be divided into
smaller and smaller
pieces forever, or was
there a limit to the
number of times a
piece of matter could
be divided?
Atomos
● His theory: Matter could
not be divided into
smaller and smaller
pieces forever, eventually
the smallest possible
piece would be obtained.
● This piece would be
indivisible.
● He named the smallest
piece of matter “atomos,”
meaning “not to be cut.”
Atomos
▪ To Democritus, atoms
were small, hard
particles that were all
made of the same
material but were
different shapes and
sizes.
▪ Atoms were infinite in
number, always
moving and capable
of joining together.
This theory was ignored and
forgotten for more than 2000
years!
Why?
● The eminent
philosophers
of the time,
Aristotle and
Plato, had a
more
respected, Aristotle and Plato favored the earth, fire, air
and water approach to the nature of matter.
(and Their ideas held sway because of their
eminence as philosophers. The atomos idea
ultimately was buried for approximately 2000 years.
wrong) theory.
Dalton’s Model
● In the early 1800s,
the English
Chemist John
Dalton performed a
number of
experiments that
eventually led to
the acceptance of
the idea of atoms.
Dalton’s Theory
● He deduced that all
elements are composed of
atoms. Atoms are
indivisible and
indestructible particles.
● Atoms of the same element
are exactly alike.
● Atoms of different elements
are different.
● Compounds are formed by
the joining of atoms of two
or more elements.
.

● This theory
became one
of the
foundations of
modern
chemistry.
Thomson’s Plum Pudding Model
● In 1897, the
English scientist
J.J. Thomson
provided the first
hint that an atom
is made of even
smaller particles.
Thomson Model
● He proposed a
model of the atom
that is sometimes
called the “Plum
Pudding” model.
● Atoms were made
from a positively
charged substance
with negatively
charged electrons
scattered about,
like raisins in a
pudding.
Thomson Model
● Thomson studied
the passage of
an electric
current through a
gas.
● As the current
passed through
the gas, it gave
off rays of
negatively
charged
Thomson Model
Where did
they come
● This surprised from?

Thomson,
because the
atoms of the gas
were uncharged.
Where had the
negative charges
come from?
Thomson concluded that the
negative charges came from within
the atom.

A particle smaller than an atom had


to exist.

The atom was divisible!


Thomson called the negatively
charged “corpuscles,” today known
as electrons.

Since the gas was known to be


neutral, having no charge, he
reasoned that there must be
positively charged particles in the
atom.

But he could never find them.


Rutherford’s Gold Foil
Experiment
● In 1908, the
English physicist
Ernest Rutherford
was hard at work
on an experiment
that seemed to
have little to do
with unraveling the
mysteries of the
atomic structure.
● Rutherford’s experiment involved
firing a stream of tiny positively
charged particles at a thin sheet of
gold foil (2000 atoms thick)
● Most of the positively
charged “bullets” passed
right through the gold
atoms in the sheet of
gold foil without changing
course at all.
● Some of the positively
charged “bullets,”
however, did bounce
away from the gold sheet
as if they had hit
something solid. He
knew that positive
charges repel positive
charges.
RUTHERFORD’S
EXPERIMENT
● http://www.mhhe.com/physsci/chemistry/e
ssentialchemistry/flash/ruther14.swf
● This could only mean that the gold atoms in the
sheet were mostly open space. Atoms were not
a pudding filled with a positively charged
material.
● Rutherford concluded that an atom had a small,
dense, positively charged center that repelled his
positively charged “bullets.”
● He called the center of the atom the “nucleus”
● The nucleus is tiny compared to the atom as a
whole.
Rutherford
● Rutherford reasoned
that all of an atom’s
positively charged
particles were
contained in the
nucleus. The
negatively charged
particles were
scattered outside the
nucleus around the
atom’s edge.
Bohr Model
● In 1913, the
Danish scientist
Niels Bohr
proposed an
improvement. In
his model, he
placed each
electron in a
specific energy
level.
Bohr
SIR Model
JAMES CHADWICK
DISCOVERED THE NEUTRON IN 1935
● According to Bohr’s
atomic model,
electrons move in
definite orbits
around the
nucleus, much like
planets circle the
sun. These orbits,
or energy levels,
are located at
certain distances
from the nucleus.
Quantum Mechanical Model
Wave Model
The Wave Model
● Today’s atomic
model is based on
the principles of
wave mechanics.
● According to the
theory of wave
mechanics,
electrons do not
move about an
atom in a definite
path, like the
planets around the
sun.
The Wave Model
● In fact, it is impossible to determine the exact
location of an electron. The probable location of
an electron is based on how much energy the
electron has.
● According to the modern atomic model, at atom
has a small positively charged nucleus
surrounded by a large region in which there are
enough electrons to make an atom neutral.
Electron Cloud:
● A space in which
electrons are likely to be
found.
● Electrons whirl about the
nucleus billions of times
in one second
● They are not moving
around in random
patterns.
● Location of electrons
depends upon how much
energy the electron has.
Electron Cloud:

● Depending on their energy they are locked into a


certain area in the cloud.
● Electrons with the lowest energy are found in
the energy level closest to the nucleus
● Electrons with the highest energy are found
in the outermost energy levels, farther from
the nucleus.
Indivisible Electron Nucleus Orbit Electron
Cloud
Greek X
Dalton X
Thomson X
Rutherford X X
Bohr X X X
Wave X X X
Models of the Atom

review
Democritus theory of atom
● Small, indivisible spheres

http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images/
Dalton’s Theory
● He deduced that all
elements are composed of
atoms. Atoms are
indivisible and
indestructible particles.
● Atoms of the same element
are exactly alike.
● Atoms of different elements
are different.
● Compounds are formed by
the joining of atoms of two
or more elements.
J.J. Thompson’s Model of Atom
● Plum Pudding Model,
1896
● Thought an atom was
like plum pudding
● Dough was
● Raisins

http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images/

● Didn’t know about


neutrons at this time
Rutherford’s Model of the Atom
● Rutherford Model,
1911
● Thought atom was
mostly empty space
● Nucleus

● Electrons (negatively
charged) http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images/
Rutherford’s model
● This could only mean that the gold atoms in the
sheet were mostly open space. Atoms were not
a pudding filled with a positively charged
material.
● Rutherford concluded that an atom had a small,
dense, positively charged center that repelled his
positively charged “bullets.”
● He called the center of the atom the “nucleus”
● The nucleus is tiny compared to the atom as a
whole.
Bohr’s Model of the Atom
● Neils Bohr, 1913
● Similar to Rutherford’s
model
● Thought atom was mostly
empty space
● Nucleus in center is
dense, positively charge
● Electrons are arranged
in energy levels around http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images/
the nucleus
Electron Cloud Model
● De Broglie and,
Schrodinger~1926

● Think atom is mostly


empty space
● Nucleus in center is
dense, positively
charge
● Only a probability of
finding electrons in
certain areas around
the nucleus

http://particleadventure.org/particleadventure/frameless/modern_atom.html

You might also like