Research paper 1
Research paper 1
IN A RURAL COUNTY
WILLIAM D. MANGOLD
University of Arkansas
Concept Ion c f t c i
\
!'arrinpe h e f o r e
Figure 1
METHOD
TABLE 1
Distribution of Women by Marital Status at Delivery
for Interviews and Birth Records by Race
li’hite Rlack
Marital Status Sample Records Sample Q.ecords
Single
RESULTS
TABLE 2
Indicators of the Extent that Pregancy was Desired by
Family Formation Categories and Racea
h3ite Black
A l l Komen 100%
(17)
Tried t o
Become 58.8 38.9 11.8
Pregnant (20) (7) (2)
Negative
Reaction by 3.8 44.4 52.9
Mother (3) ( 8) 19)
Negative
Reaction by 11.1 17.6
Partner (2) (3)
h'hite Black
?lC PMC IJ B Total PF!C (lI3 Total
Premarital C o i t u s
Frequency
Per >tonth No Yes
White Black
Contraceptive NC PFIC UE Total PMC UB Total
Use
Premarital Coitus
No Yes
Method
TABLE 5
Length of Time Between the First Date and Dating on a Regular
Basis, Initiation of Coitus, and Knowledge of Pregnancy by
Family Formation Categories and Race
Median
Interval FlC
____---
hhite
PhlC un -
TOTAL n:c
Black
UB TOTAL
(Iceeks)
F i r s t Date
Until 4.7 2.2 1.5 3.3 30.5 5.1a 17.3
Rcmlar (34) (15) (14) (66) (17) (3C) (471
Date
Regular
Date 3.Ob 40.0 15.5 29.2 21.0 13.7' 16.3
Until (18) (18) (14) (50) (17) (50) (47)
CoitGs
Coitus
Lbtil 52.4 2b.O 16.0 37.5 23.0 23.0 23.0
Prcgnancy (34) (If) (14) (66) (17) (31) (48)
a. Excludes one woman who claimed that she never dated the baby's father o n
a regular basis.
b. Restricted t o women with premarital coitus.
c. Excludes one woman who refused t o answer.
TABLE 6
Relative Conception Index by Family Formation Category and Race
Total
Legitimated
Pregnancy
U nl egi t i m zt ed
Pregnancy
TABLE 7
Age at First Live Birth and First Coitus by
Contraceptive Use and Race
kkite Elack Total
Interval Coritraceptivc
Use
than were the nonusers (18.7 versus 17.3). The youngest are the
black nonusers, who averaged 16.9 years of age.
Analysis of the age at the onset of sexual activity reveals
that the major source of difference in age at first birth between
black and white teen-agers is primarily due to a divergence in
patterns of contraceptive use between black and white women
and, more specifically, a relationship between age and con-
traceptive use among black teen-agers. While there is little
difference in the age of white users and nonusers (roughly 0.5
years), there is a 1.2-year difference between black users and
nonusers. The average age a t first intercourse among black
useri is 17. I , or 0.3 years younger than white women. Among
black nonusers there is a much larger difference, the greatest
disparity being 1.8 years between white users and black non-
users.
270 YOUTH & SOCIETY / hlARCZ1 1979
DISCUSSION
there was little difference in the ages of white and black women
among contraceptive users, the black nonusers were consider-
ably younger than their white counterparts. The fact that the
black teen-agers became pregnant at a younger age implied a
more youthful father of the baby. The net effect of this age
factor is t o further depress the chances of marriage following
pregnancy as the accumulation of resources required for
marriage tend to vary directly with age.
Finally, one additional facet of black-white differences
requires discussion. The higher prevalence of pregnancy
outside of marriage among black teens cannot be regarded as
either a greater desire for childbearing or a reduced commit-
ment for marriage. As indicated by a number of separate items,
black women were more hesitant about becoming pregnant
than were whites. Black teen-agers were less likely to report
that they had wished for, or thought that others wanted them
to have, a baby. They were almost universal in their denials
that they had tried to become pregnant. Within comparable
family categories-the unmarried or the premaritally preg-
nant-blacks reported substantially lower pregnancy desires
for motherhood.
In this respect, motherhood among blacks in the study
presents an enigma: while black teens denied either intent or
desire to become a mother, there was little conscious inter-
vention to avoid pregnancy in spite of an apparent ability to d o
so. One explanation of this contradiction may be found in the
nature of the black family and the relative lack of alternatives.
Over 40y0 of the black women in the study were raised in a
female-headed family. Family size among the mothers of the
black women in the study tended to be quite large, averaging
7.5 children per family. Reflecting the rural, impoverished
nature of the county, employment opportunities were limited.
The primary source of employment for black women in the
study was that of a farm laborer or as a domestic worker.
Nearly 75% of the black teen-agers in the study had never held
a regular or a full-time job.
272 YOUTH & SOCIETY I hfARCH 1979
REFERENCES
BOWERhlAN, C., et al. (1966) Unwed Motherhood: Personal and Social Con-
sequences. Chapel Hill: Institute for Research in Social Science, University of
North Carolina.
CHRISTENSEN, H. (1960) ”Cultural relativism and premarital sex norms.” Ameri-
can Sociological Review 25: 30-39.
FURSTENBURG, F. (I97 I) “Birth control experience among pregnant adolescents:
The process o f unplanned parenthood.” Social Problems 19: 192-203.
GIBBS, Jr., et al. (1973) Unwed hlotherhood and Premarital Pregnancy: Practical
Significance and Sociological Explanation. Final Report to the National Institute
of Child Health and Human Development.
GOODE, W. (1960) “Illegitimacy in the Caribbean social structure.” American
Sociological Review 25: 21-30.
HILL, R.. et al. (1959) The Family and Population Control: A Puerto Rican Experi-
ment in Social Change. New Haven: College and University Press.
hf ANGOLD, W.(1974) Teenage Fertility and Family Formation. Doctoral Disserta-
tion. Center for Demographic Studies. Duke University. Durham, N.C.
hlYRDAL. G. (1934) An American Dilemma. New York: Harper and Row.
POPE. H. (1969) “Negro-white differences in decisions regarding illegitimate chil-
dren.”JournaI of hlarriage and the Family 31: 756-764.
PRESSER, H. (1974) “Early motherhood: Ignorance or bliss?” Family Planning
Perspectives 6: 8-14.
RAINWATER, L. (1965) Family Design: Marital Sexuality, Family Size and Con-
traception. Chicago: Aldine.
. ___ (1960) And the Poor Get Children. Chicago: Quadrangle.
RINDFUSS, R.. and C. WESTOFF (1974) The initiation of contraception. Demo-
graphy I I: 75-88.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1978) Trends in Childspacing. June 1975. Current Popu-
lation Reports, Series P-20. No. 315. Washington. D.C.: U.S. Government
Printing Office.
Mangold / TEEN-AGE FAhllLY F O R h l A T l O S 273
U.S. National Center for Health Statistics (1976) Advance Report: Final Natality
Statistics, 1975, Vol. 25, No. 10, Supplement. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govern-
ment Printing Office.
WHELAN, E. (1972) "The temporal relationship of marriage, conception, and birth
in hlassachusetts." Demography 9: 399-414.
ZELNICK, hl., and J. KANTNER (1978)"First pregnancies to nomen aged 15-19:
1976 and 1971." Family Planning Perspectkes I0 11-20.
(1977)"Sexual and contraceptiveexperience ofyoung unmarried women in the
United States, 1976 and 1971." Family Planning Perspectiyes 9: 55.
---(1974) "The resolution of teenage first pregnancies." Family Planning Perspec-
tives 6: 83.
_-- (1973) "Contraception and pregnancy: Experience of young unmarried a o m e n
in the United States." Family Planning Perspectives 5: 21-35.
__- (1972) "Sexual experience of young unmarried women in the United States."
Family Planning Perspectives 4 9-18.
--- (1971) "Exploratory studies of Negro family formation-factors relating to
illegitimacy." Studies in Family Planning 60: 5-9.