Automatic Particle Counters

ICM 2.0
In-Line Contamination Monitor

39 Automatic Particle Counters

Introduction 10
 Introduction

Contamination management
INDEX

Page
1 HYDRAULIC FLUIDS 12

2 FLUIDS CONTAMINATION 12

3 EFFECTS OF CONTAMINATION ON HYDRAULIC COMPONENTS 12

4 MEASURING THE SOLID CONTAMINATION LEVEL 13

5 RECOMMENDED CONTAMINATION CLASSES 16

6 WATER IN HYDRAULIC AND LUBRICATING FLUIDS 16

11 Introduction
CONTAMINATION MANAGEMENT

1 HYDRAULIC FLUIDS
The fluid is the vector that transmits power, energy within an oleodynamic circuit. - ANTIOXIDANT STABILITY AND WEAR PROTECTION
In addition to transmitting energy through the circuit, it also performs additional These features translate into the capacity of a hydraulic oil to avoid corrosion
functions such as lubrication, protection and cooling of the surfaces. of metal elements inside the system.
The classification of fluids used in hydraulic systems is coded in many regulatory
references, different Standards. - HEAT TRANSFER CAPACITY
It is the characteristic that indicates the capacity of hydraulic oil to exchange
The most popular classification criterion divides them into the following families: heat with the surfaces and then cool them.
- MINERAL OILS
Commonly used oil deriving fluids.

- FIRE RESISTANT FLUIDS

Fluids with intrinsic characteristics of incombustibility or high flash point. 2 FLUID CONTAMINATION
- SYNTHETIC FLUIDS Whatever the nature and properties of fluids, they are inevitably subject to
Modified chemical products to obtain specific optimized features. contamination. Fluid contamination can have two origins:

- ECOLOGICAL FLUIDS - INITIAL CONTAMINATION

Synthetic or vegetable origin fluids with high biodegradability characteristics. Caused by the introduction of contaminated fluid into the circuit, or by incorrect
storage, transport or transfer operations.
The choice of fluid for an hydraulic system must take into account several
parameters. - PROGRESSIVE CONTAMINATION
These parameters can adversely affect the performance of an hydraulic system, Caused by factors related to the operation of the system, such as metal
causing delay in the controls, pump cavitation, excessive absorption, excessive surface wear, sealing wear, oxidation or degradation of the fluid, the
temperature rise, efficiency reduction, increased drainage, wear, jam/block or air introduction of contaminants during maintenance, corrosion due to chemical
intake in the plant. or electrochemical action between fluid and components, cavitation.
The contamination of hydraulic systems can be of different nature:
The main properties that characterize hydraulic fluids and affect their choice are:
- DYNAMIC VISCOSITY - SOLID CONTAMINATION
It identifies the fluid’s resistance to sliding due to the impact of the particles For example rust, slag, metal particles, fibers, rubber particles, paint particles
forming it. - or additives

- CINEMATIC VISCOSITY - LIQUID CONTAMINATION

It is a widespread formal dimension in the hydraulic field. For example, the presence of water due to condensation or external infiltration
It is calculated with the ratio between the dynamic viscosity and the fluid or acids
density.
Cinematic viscosity varies with temperature and pressure variations. - GASEOUS CONTAMINATION
For example, the presence of air due to inadequate oil level in the tank,
- VISCOSITY INDEX drainage in suction ducts, incorrect sizing of tubes or tanks.
This value expresses the ability of a fluid to maintain viscosity when the
temperature changes.
A high viscosity index indicates the fluid’s ability to limit viscosity variations
by varying the temperature. 3 EFFECTS OF CONTAMINATION ON HYDRAULIC
- FILTERABILITY INDEX
COMPONENTS
It is the value that indicates the ability of a fluid to cross the filter materials.
A low filterability index could cause premature clogging of the filter material. Solid contamination is recognized as the main cause of malfunction, failure and
early degradation in hydraulic systems. It is impossible to delete it completely,
- WORKING TEMPERATURE but it can be effectively controlled by appropriate devices.
Working temperature affects the fundamental characteristics of the fluid.
As already seen, some fluid characteristics, such as cinematic viscosity, vary
with the temperature variation. CONTAMINATION IN PRESENCE OF CONTAMINATION IN PRESENCE OF
LARGE TOLERANCES NARROW TOLERANCES
When choosing a hydraulic oil, must therefore be taken into account of the
environmental conditions in which the machine will operate.

- COMPRESSIBILITY MODULE
Every fluid subjected to a pressure contracts, increasing its density.
The compressibility module identifies the increase in pressure required to
cause a corresponding increase in density.

- HYDROLYTIC STABILITY
It is the characteristic that prevents galvanic pairs that can cause wear in
the plant/system. Solid contamination mainly causes surface damage and component wear.

Introduction 12
 CONTAMINATION MANAGEMENT

- SURFACE EROSION - MODIFICATION OF FLUID PROPERTIES

Cause of leakage through mechanical seals, reduction of system performance, (COMPRESSIBILITY MODULE, DENSITY, VISCOSITY)
variation in adjustment of control components, failures. Cause of system’s reduction of efficiency and of control.
It is easy to understand how a system without proper contamination
- ADHESION OF MOVING PARTS management is subject to higher costs than a system that is provided.
Cause of failure due to lack of lubrication.
- MAINTENANCE
- DAMAGES DUE TO FATIGUE Maintenance activities, spare parts, machine stop costs
Cause of breakdowns and components breakdown.
- ENERGY AND EFFICIENCY
Efficiency and performance reduction due to friction, drainage, cavitation.

ABRASION EROSION

4 MEASURING THE SOLID CONTAMINATION LEVEL

The level of contamination of a system identifies the amount of contaminant

contained in a fluid.
This parameter refers to a unit volume of fluid.
ADHESION FATIGUE The level of contamination may be different at different points in the system.
From the information in the previous paragraphs it is also apparent that the level
of contamination is heavily influenced by the working conditions of the system,
by its working years and by the environmental conditions.

What is the size of the contaminating particles that we must handle in our
hydraulic circuit?

Liquid contamination mainly results in decay of lubrication performance and

protection of fluid surfaces.

DISSOLVED WATER

- INCREASING FLUID ACIDITY

HUMAN HAIR MINIMUM DIMENSION TYPICAL CONTAMINANT
Cause of surface corrosion and premature fluid oxidation (75 µm) VISIBLE HUMAN EYES DIMENSION IN A
(40 µm) HYDRAULIC CIRCUIT
- GALVANIC COUPLE AT HIGH TEMPERATURES (4÷14 µm)
Cause of corrosion

FREE WATER - ADDITIONAL EFFECTS Contamination level analysis is significant only if performed with a uniform
and repeatable method, conducted with standard test methods and suitably
- DECAY OF LUBRICANT PERFORMANCE calibrated equipment.
Cause of rust and sludge formation, metal corrosion and increased solid To this end, ISO has issued a set of standards that allow tests to be conducted
contamination and express the measured values in the following ways.

- BATTERY COLONY CREATION - GRAVIMETRIC LEVEL - ISO 4405

Cause of worsening in the filterability feature
The level of contamination is defined by checking the weight of particles
- ICE CREATION AT LOW TEMPERATURES collected by a laboratory membrane. The membrane must be cleaned, dried and
Cause damage to the surface desiccated, with fluid and conditions defined by the Standard.
The volume of fluid is filtered through the membrane by using a suitable suction
- ADDITIVE DEPLETION system. The weight of the contaminant is determined by checking the weight of
Free water retains polar additives the membrane before and after the fluid filtration.

Gaseous contamination mainly results in decay of system performance.

- CUSHION SUSPENSION
Cause of increased noise and cavitation.

- FLUID OXIDATION
Cause of corrosion acceleration of metal parts.
CLEAN CONTAMINATED
MEMBRANE MEMBRANE

13 Introduction
CONTAMINATION MANAGEMENT

- CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION OF THE PARTICLES SIZE - ISO 4406 ISO 4406:2017 Cleanliness Code System
Microscope counting examines the particles differently to APCs and the code is
The level of contamination is defined by counting the number of particles of given with two scale numbers only.
certain dimensions per unit of volume of fluid. Measurement is performed by These are at 5 µm and 15 µm equivalent to the 6 µm(c) and 14 µm(c) of APCs.
Automatic Particle Counters (APC).
Following the count, the contamination classes are determined, corresponding to
the number of particles detected in the unit of fluid.
Cleanliness Code Chart
The most common classification methods follow ISO 4406 and SAE AS 4059 with 100 ml sample volume
(Aerospace Sector) regulations.
NAS 1638 is still used although obsolete. 1.6
107 24
8

Classification example according to ISO 4406 23

The code refers to the number of particles of the same size or greater than 4
4, 6 or 14 μm in a 1 ml fluid. 22
2
Example Code
22/19/14 21

22/1
106
Class Number of particles per ml

9/14
20
Over Up to 5
28 1 300 000 2 500 000 19
27 640 000 1 300 000 2.5
26 320 000 640 000
25 160 000 320 000 18
24 80 000 160 000 1.3
23 40 000 80 000 105
22 20 000 40 000 17
21 10 000 20 000 6.4
20 5 000 10 000
19 2 500 5 000 16
18 1 300 2 500 3.2
17 640 1 300 15
16 320 640
15 160 320 1.6
14 80 160 14
13 40 80 104
12 20 40 8
11 10 20 13
10 5 10
4
9 2.5 5
8 1.3 2.5 12
7 0.64 1.3 2
6 0.32 0.64
5 0.16 0.32 11
4 0.08 0.16 103
3 0.04 0.08
2 0.02 0.04 10
1 0.01 0.02 5
0 0 0.01
9
> 4 µm(c) = 350 particles 2.5
> 6 µm(c) = 100 particles
Number of particles per 100ml larger than indicated size

> 14 µm(c) = 25 particles 8

16 / 14 / 12 1.3
102
7
6.4
6
3.2
5
1.6
4
10
8
ISO 4 Code numbers

3
4
2
2
1
1

4 6 14 New ISO 4406 standard µm(c)

5 15 Old standard

Introduction 14
 CONTAMINATION MANAGEMENT

- CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION OF THE PARTICLES SIZE - SAE AS 4059-1 - CLASSES OF CONTAMINATION ACCORDING TO NAS 1638 (January 1964)
and SAE AS 4059-2
The NAS system was originally developed in 1964 to define contamination classes
Classification example according to SAE AS 4059-1 and SAE AS 4059-2 for the contamination contained within aircraft components.
The code, prepared for the aerospace industry, is based on the size, quantity, and The application of this standard was extended to industrial hydraulic systems
particle spacing in a 100 ml fluid sample. The contamination classes are defined simply because nothing else existed at the time.
by numeric codes, the size of the contaminant is identified by letters (A-F). The coding system defines the maximum numbers permitted of 100ml volume
at various size intervals (differential counts) rather than using cumulative counts
It can be made a differential measurement (Table 1) or a cumulative as in ISO 4406:1999. Although there is no guidance given in the standard on
measurement (Table 2) how to quote the levels, most industrial users quote a single code which is the
highest recorded in all sizes and this convention is used on MP Filtri APC’s.

Table 1 - Class for differential measurement The contamination classes are defined by a number (from 00 to 12) which
Class Dimension of contaminant indicates the maximum number of particles per 100 ml, counted on a differential
basis, in a given size bracket.
6÷14 µm(c) 14÷21 µm(c) 21÷38 µm(c) 38÷70 µm(c) >70 µm(c)
00 125 22 4 1 0 Size Range Classes (in microns)
0 250 44 8 2 0
1 500 89 16 3 1 Maximum Contamination Limits per 100 ml
2 1 000 178 32 6 1
3 2 000 356 63 11 2 Class 5÷15 15÷25 25÷50 50÷100 >100
4 4 000 712 126 22 4 00 125 22 4 1 0
5 8 000 1 425 253 45 8 0 250 44 8 2 0
6 16 000 2 850 506 90 16 1 500 89 16 3 1
7 32 000 5 700 1 012 180 32 2 1 000 178 32 6 1
8 64 000 11 400 2 025 360 64 3 2 000 356 63 11 2
9 128 000 22 800 4 050 720 128 4 4 000 712 126 22 4
10 256 000 45 600 8 100 1 440 256 5 8 000 1 425 253 45 8
11 512 000 91 200 16 200 2 880 512 6 16 000 2 850 506 90 16
12 1 024 000 182 400 32 400 5 760 1 024 7 32 000 5 700 1 012 180 32
8 64 000 11 400 2 025 360 64
6÷14 µm(c) = 15 000 particles 9 128 000 22 800 4 050 720 128
14÷21 µm(c) = 2 200 particles 10 256 000 45 600 8 100 1 440 256
21÷38 µm(c) = 200 particles 11 512 000 91 200 16 200 2 880 512
38÷70 µm(c) = 35 particles 12 1 024 000 182 400 32 400 5 760 1 024
> 70 µm(c) = 3 particles
Class 6 5÷15 µm = 42 000 particles
15÷25 µm = 2 200 particles
25÷50 µm = 150 particles
Table 2 - Class for cumulative measurement 50÷100 µm = 18 particles
Class Dimension of contaminant > 100 µm = 3 particles
Class NAS 8
>4 µm(c) >6 µm(c) >14 µm(c) >21 µm(c) >38 µm(c) >70 µm(c)
A B C D E F
000 195 76 14 3 1 0 - CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION OF THE PARTICLES SIZE - ISO 4407
00 390 152 27 5 1 0
0 780 304 54 10 2 0
1 1 560 609 109 20 4 1 The level of contamination is defined by counting the number of particles
2 3 120 1 217 217 39 7 1 collected by a laboratory membrane per unit of fluid volume. The measurement
3 6 250 2 432 432 76 13 2 is done by a microscope.
4 12 500 4 864 864 152 26 4 The membrane must be cleaned, dried and desiccated, with fluid and conditions
5 25 000 9 731 1 731 306 53 8
50 000
defined by the Standard. The fluid volume is filtered through the membrane, using
6 19 462 3 462 612 106 16
7 100 000 38 924 6 924 1 224 212 32 a suitable suction system.
8 200 000 77 849 13 849 2 449 424 64 The level of contamination is identified by dividing
9 400 000 155 698 27 698 4 898 848 128 the membrane into a predefined number of areas
10 800 000 311 396 55 396 9 796 1 696 256 and by counting the contaminant particles using
11 1 600 000 622 792 110 792 19 592 3 392 512 a suitable laboratory microscope.
12 3 200 000 1 245 584 221 584 39 184 6 784 1 024
MICROSCOPE CONTROL
AND MEASUREMENT
> 4 µm(c) = 45 000 particles
> 6 µm(c) = 15 000 particles
> 14 µm(c) = 1 500 particles
> 21 µm(c) = 250 particles COMPARISON
> 38 µm(c) = 15 particles PHOTOGRAPH’S
> 70 µm(c) = 3 particles 1 graduation = 10µm
Class from 2F to 4E

ISO 4406:1999 Class 16/14/11 Class 22/20/17

SAE AS4059E Table 1 Class 5 Class 11
NAS 1638 Class 5 Class 11
SAE AS4059E Table 2 Class 6A/5B/5C Class 12A/11B/11C

15 Introduction
CONTAMINATION MANAGEMENT

- CLEANLINESS CODE COMPARISON 6 WATER IN HYDRAULIC AND LUBRICATING FLUIDS

Although ISO 4406:2017 standard is being used extensively within the Water Content
hydraulics industry other standards are occasionally required and a comparison
may be requested. The table below gives a very general comparison but often In mineral oils and non aqueous resistant fluids water is undesirable. Mineral
no direct comparison is possible due to the different classes and sizes involved. oil usually has a water content of 50-300 ppm (@40°C) which it can support
without adverse consequences.
Once the water content exceeds about 300ppm the oil starts to appear hazy. Above
ISO 4406:2017 SAE AS4059 SAE AS4059 NAS 1638 this level there is a danger of free water accumulating in the system in areas of
Table 2 Table 1 low flow. This can lead to corrosion and accelerated wear.
4-6 Similarly, fire resistant fluids have a natural water which may be different
5-15
6-14 to mineral oil.
> 4 µm(c) > 4 µm(c) 14-21 15-25
6 µm(c) 6 µm(c) 25-50
21-38 600
14 µm(c) 14 µm(c) 50-100
38-70 >100
>70
23 / 21 / 18 13A / 12B / 12C 12 12

Parts per million

400
22 / 20 / 17 12A / 11B / 11C 11 11
21 / 19 / 16 11A / 10B / 10C 10 10
20 / 18 / 15 10A / 9B / 9B 9 9
200
19 / 17 / 14 9A / 8B / 8C 8 8
18 / 16 / 13 8A / 7B / 7C 7 7
17 / 15 / 12 7A / 6B / 6C 6 6
0
16 / 14 / 11 6A / 5B / 5C 5 5 20 30 40 50 60 70
15 / 13 / 10 5A / 4B / 4C 4 4 Temperature °C
Hydraulic oil
14 / 12 / 09 4A / 3B / 3C 3 3 Gear oil
Turbine oil
Saturation Levels

Since the effects of free (also emulsified) water is more harmful than those of
5 RECOMMENDED CONTAMINATION CLASSES dissolved water, water levels should remain well below the saturation point.

However, even water in solution can cause damage and therefore every
Any are the nature and the properties of fluids, they are inevitably subject to
reasonable effort should be made to keep saturation levels as low as possible.
contamination. The level of contamination can be managed by using special
There is no such thing as too little water. As a guideline, we recommend maintaining
components called filters.
saturation levels below 50% in all equipment.
Hydraulic components builders, knowing the problem of contamination,
recommend the filtration level appropriate to the use of their products.
TYPICAL WATER SATURATION LEVEL FOR NEW OILS
Examples:
Example of recommended contamination levels for pressures below 140 bar.
Hydraulic oil @ 30°C = 200ppm = 100% saturation
Hydraulic oil @ 65°C = 500ppm = 100% saturation
Free water

Piston pumps
•
with fixed flow rate
Piston pumps Saturation point
•
with variable flow rate
- 100%
Vane pumps
with fixed flow rate • Emulsified
Vane pumps
•
with variable flow
Engines •
- 75%
Hydraulic cylinders •
Actuators •
Test benches •
- 50%
Check valve •
Directional valves •
Flow regulating valves •
Proportional valves •
Servo-valves • - 25%
Flat bearings
Dissolved water

•
Ball bearings •
ISO 4406 CODE 20/18/15 19/17/14 18/16/13 17/15/12 16/14/11 15/13/10
Recommended ß20(c) ß15(c) ß10(c) ß7(c) ß7(c) ß5(c)
filtration ßx(c)≥1.000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 - 0%

Introduction 16
 CONTAMINATION MANAGEMENT

W - Water and Temperature Sensing By removing water from your fluid power system, you can prevent such key
problems as:
“W” option, in MP Filtri Contamination Monitoring Products, indicates water content - corrosion (metal etching)
as a percentage of saturation and oil temperature in degrees centigrade. 100% - loss of lubricant power
RH corresponds to the point at which free water can exist in the fluid. i.e. the fluid - accelerated abrasive wear in hydraulic components
is no longer able to hold the water in a dissolved solution. - valve-locking
The sensor can help provide early indication of costly failure due to free water, - bearing fatigue
including but not exclusive to: - viscosity variance (reduction in lubricating properties)
- Corrosion - additive precipitation and oil oxidation
- Metal surface fatigue e.g. bearing failure - increase in acidity level
- Reduced lubrication & load carrying characteristics - increased electrical conductivity (loss of dielectric strength)
- slow/weak response of control systems
Different oils have different saturation levels and therefore RH (relative humidity)
% is the best and most practical measurement. Product availability - UFM Series:
UFM 041
UFM 051
Water absorber UFM 091
UFM 181
Water is present everywhere, during storage, handling and servicing. UFM 919

MP Filtri filter elements feature an absorbent media which protects hydraulic

systems from both particulate and water contamination.
MP Filtri’s filter element technology is available with inorganic microfiber media
with a filtration rating 25 μm (therefore identified with media designation WA025,
providing absolute filtration of solid particles to ßx(c) = 1000).
Absorbent media is made by water absorbent fibres which increase in size during
the absorption process.
Free water is thus bonded to the filter media and completely removed from the
system (it cannot even be squeezed out).

Filter Media Absorber media layer

Fabric that absorbs water The Filter Media has absorbed water

External protective wire mesh

Water absorber layer
Inorganic microfiber media
Inner support layer
Inner protective wire mesh

>>>

Support pipe

17 Introduction
ICM 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

Description

Automatic Particle Counters

In-Line Contamination Monitor

The ICM 2.0 automatically measures and displays particulate contamination, moisture and temperature
levels in various hydraulic fluids.
It is designed specifically to be mounted directly to systems, where ongoing measurement or analysis is
required, and where space and costs are limited.

> Features & Benefits Scope of Supply

- 8 channel contamination measurement & display - 1 x ICM 2.0 (Specific model will be as per ordered item)
- Measures and displays the following international standard formats: - 1 x 3m Twisted Pair Cable Assembly
ISO 4406:2017, NAS 1638, AS 4059E - 1 x Hard copy Quick start/wiring installation guide
- Moisture and temperature sensing fluid dependent - 1 x Hard copy Fluid Condition Handbook
- Data logging and 4000 test result memory - 1 x Digital copy of user guides/software/drivers
- Manual, automatic and remote control flexibility - 1 x Hard copy of calibration certificate
- Multicolour indicators via LCD (K versions) and LED with output
alarm signals as standard See Accessories at page 83.
- Robust die cast aluminium construction
- LPA View software (included)
- Pressure max. 420 bar
- Environmental protection IP65/67 versatile
- Secondary connector to allow the simultaneous control/download
of results during operation
- Option available to download all results onto a USB stick, direct from the ICM
- 4-20mA analogue output as standard

Status LED
All ICM 2.0 versions have a multicolour indicator on the front panel, which
is used to indicate the status or alarm state. ICM-K versions also have a
screen that changes colour. The alarm thresholds can be set from
LPA-View via the serial interface.

Screen and multicolor indicators

Green indicates that the test result passed, i.e. none of the
alarm thresholds were exceeded
Left facing view Right facing view
Yellow indicates that the lower cleanliness limit was exceeded,
but not the upper one

Red indicates that the upper clean liness limit was exceeded

Blue indicates that the upper water content limit was exceeded

Red/Blue Alternating indicates both cleanliness and water

content upper limits exceeded

Violet indicates that the upper temperature limit was exceeded

Top view with USB port Bottom view

Automatic Particle Counters 40

 GENERAL INFORMATION ICM 2.0
Technical data

Technology Data Storage

LED Based Light Extinction Automatic Optical Contamination Monitor 4000 tests

Particle Sizing Communication options

>4, 6, 14, 21, 25, 38, 50, 70 μm(c) to ISO 4406:2017 Standard RS485, MODBUS, CANBUS, 4-20mA time multiplex as standard

Analysis range Relays

ISO 4406:2017 Code 0 to 25 Two solid state relays fitted to “R” version for output to alarm circuits
NAS 1638 Class 00 to 12
AS4059 Rev. E Table 1&2 Sizes A-F: 000 (Lower Limits are Test Time Environmental Protection
dependent) IP 65/67 versatile IK04 Impact Protection

Accuracy Moisture Sensing

± ½ code for 4,6,14 μm(c) ± 1 code for larger sizes % RH (Relative Humidity) ±3%

Calibration Weight
Each unit individually calibrated with ISO Medium Test Dust (MTD) based 1.6 kg
on ISO 11171, on equipment certified by I.F.T.S. ISO 11943
Electrical Supply
Operating Flow Rate Voltage 9-36V DC
20 - 400 ml/minute
Power consumption
Viscosity range <2.2 W
≤ 1000 cSt
Outer Casing Finish
Fluid temperature Polyurethane BS X34B. Colour BS381-638 (Dark Sea Grey)
From -25 °C to +80 °C Industry 4.0 ready with appropriate accessory product

Ambient Temperature Wetted parts

From -25 °C to +80 °C (non K version) M - C46400 Cu alloy, 316 stainless steel, FPM, FR4, sapphire.
N - 316 stainless steel, FPM, sapphire.
From -25 °C to +55 °C (K version)
S - 316 stainless steel, perfluoro elastomer, sapphire, EPDM.

Temperature Measurement Software

±3 °C LPA View software (included)

Pressure
Maximum: 420 bar

Test time
Adjustable 10 - 3600 seconds. Factory set to 120 seconds.
Start delay & programmable test intervals available as standard

Flow rate measurement

Indicator only

41 Automatic Particle Counters

ICM 2.0
LPA View Software

The LPA View software is used with the LPA3, LPA2, CML2 and ICM particle counters.
When connected to LPA View, MP Filtri CMPs can transfer results in realtime, or
alternatively, historical results can be downloaded from the CMP’s inbuilt memory.

- Runs on Windows XP, 7, and Windows 10

- Full adjustment & control of product settings, test times and alarms
- Easy test report generation
- Trend analysis
- Graphical display options
- Universal format across our contamination monitoring product range

Hydraulic Circuit

TYPICAL PRESSURE LINE TYPICAL RETURN LINE

Check valve Check valve

0.5 - 2 bar 0.5 - 2 bar
typical typical
FLOW

FLOW

ICM ICM

PC/Laptop PC/Laptop
power supply power supply
USBi USBi

Check valve value

dependent on
M M system pressure

P2

∆p >0.3 bar ∆p 0.5 to 2 bar

FLOW

typical ICM typical

P1
For installation guidance please visit www.mpfiltri.co.uk/ICM-2_0/#Home

Automatic Particle Counters 42

 ICM 2.0
Dimensions

It is important to ensure a 0.5 - 2 bar differential across the ICM 2.0

The ICM 2.0 can be used as a standalone product or can be controlled by external PC, PLC or the ICMRDU2.0
(Remote Display Unit. 10m control cable supplied as standard).

Designation & Ordering code

AUTOMATIC PARTICLE COUNTER ICM 2.0
Series Configuration example: ICM W M K R G1 2.0
ICM In-Line Contamination Monitor

Moisture Sensor (RH%)

0 Without moisture and temperature sensor
W With moisture and temperature sensor

Fluid compatibility
M Mineral/synthetic oils
N Subsea fluids and water based fluids (*)
S Phosphate ester and aggressive fluids (*)

Keypad / Display
0 Without keypad / display
K With keypad / display

Device output
R With relays / external alarm outputs
U Test record transfer (direct to USB stick) plus relays/external alarm outputs

Connections
G1 ICM complete with M16 x 2 pressure test point connections fitted
G3 1/4” BSP - Female port
G4 7/16” UNF - Female port

Series
2.0

(*) N and S version, moisture sensor (W) not available

43 Automatic Particle Counters