0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views

Report_for_Quantum_Optics

The report discusses the behavior of quantized electromagnetic waves in static and moving cavities, focusing on the properties of cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) and the dynamical Casimir effect. It covers mode quantization, energy spectra, field commutation relations, and the implications of quantum fluctuations in electromagnetic fields. The report also explores the time-dependent mode frequencies in a moving cavity and the conditions for photon creation through parametric resonance.

Uploaded by

guo ye
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views

Report_for_Quantum_Optics

The report discusses the behavior of quantized electromagnetic waves in static and moving cavities, focusing on the properties of cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) and the dynamical Casimir effect. It covers mode quantization, energy spectra, field commutation relations, and the implications of quantum fluctuations in electromagnetic fields. The report also explores the time-dependent mode frequencies in a moving cavity and the conditions for photon creation through parametric resonance.

Uploaded by

guo ye
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Report for Quantum Optics

Ye Guo
February 2025

1 From Cavity QED to DCE


During the lecture, the topic of the behavior of quantized electromagnetic waves in a static cavity
has been brought up. The questions below will provide a guide for more in depth examination of
such a configuration, extending it to the case of a relativistically non-static cavity where photons
could be spontaneously created with energy extracted from vacuum fluctuations.

2 Properties of a Static Cavity


2.1 Mode Structure and Quantization
Consider a one-dimensional electromagnetic field confined in a perfectly conducting cavity of length
L with mirrors at x = 0 and x = L. The field satisfies Dirichlet boundary conditions:

A(0, t) = A(L, t) = 0. (1)

We will show that the vacuum state of this set up has divergent energy and fluctuation despite its
simplicity.
1. Mode Quantization:
(a) Derive the allowed mode frequencies ωn of the standing wave solutions.
(b) Write the general form of the normal mode expansion for the vector potential operator
ân (x, t) in terms of annihilation and creation operators.

1
Solution

(a) As in the lecture, the boundary condition restrains λ with L = n × λ2 , where n is a


natural number. Then, since we have the dispersion relation for light in a vacuum as
λf = c, we get that
nπc
ωn = 2πf = (2)
L
(b) From (a), we also have kn = 2π/λ = πn/L. Together with ωn , an arbitrary vector
potential permitted by our boundary conditions are superpositions of standing waves
of the form n An (t) sin nπx
P
L . This could be written as:
r
X h̄ nπx
αn e−iωn t + αn∗ eiωn t sin

A= (3)
n
2ωn ε0 L L
(4)
q
h̄ωn
Where αn = (ωn Ãn − iẼn )/2 2ϵ0 L . Promoting αn and αn∗ in this self consistent ex-
pression to operators ân and â†n
then provides the corresponding operator with adequate
normalization:
r
X h̄ nπx
ân e−iωn t + â†n eiωn t sin

 = (5)
n
2ωn ε0 L L

2. Energy and Photon States:


(a) Derive the Hamiltonian for the quantized field.
(b) Show that the energy spectrum consists of discrete photon number states.
(c) What is the zero-point energy of the cavity, and what does it tell us?

Solution

(a) As in the lecture, the Hamiltonian in second quantization language for a specific
ω is just h̄ω(↠â + 12 ). Since we are considering all normal modes, the Hamiltonian
becomes:
X 1
Ĥ = h̄ωn (â†n ân + ) (6)
n
2

(b) Since the â†n ân is just the number operator, this is trivially true.
P
(c) The zero-point energy is defined as ⟨0| Ĥ |0⟩, this is just n h̄ωn /2. Given that we
think of the eigenstate of the number operator with eigenvalue 0 as a vacuum, |0⟩ is a
vacuum state, and this vacuum state has a none zero, and in fact energy of h̄ω/2. This
commands renormalization such as by choosing a cut off frequency.

3. Field Commutation Relations and Uncertainty Principle:


(a) Compute the commutator [Â(x, t), Π̂(x′ , t)], where Π̂(x, t) = ϵ0 Ê is defined as the conju-
gate momentum.

2
(b) Compute the expectation value and variance of the electric field in the vacuum state,
show that the variance diverges.
(c) Use this to show that there are fundamental quantum fluctuations in the electromagnetic
field, consistent with Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle.
(d) Comment and conclude on your findings.

3
Solution

(a) We know that Ê = − ∂t Â, this gives us:
r
X h̄ nπx
iωn â†n eiωn t − ân e−iωn t sin

Ê = (7)
n
2ωn ε0 L L

The cross terms do not contribute to the commutator between this and  since we have
[âm , â†n ] = δmn . therefore it remains only to compute the commutator for each n, this
is just:

h̄  nπx   nπx′  
ân e−iωn t + â†n eiωn t â†n eiωn t − ân e−iωn t
 
iωn sin sin
2ωn ε0 L L L
† iωn t −iωn t
ân e−iωn t + â†n eiωn t
 
− ân e − ân e
ih̄  nπx   nπx′ 
= sin sin 2[ân â†n − â†n ân ]
2ε0 L L L
ih̄  nπx   nπx′ 
= sin sin (8)
ε0 L L L

So we have overall:
X ih̄  nπx   nπx′ 
[Â(x, t), Π̂(x′ , t)] = sin sin = ih̄δ(x − x′ ) (9)
n
L L L

(b) We have that ⟨0| Ê |0⟩ = 0 since the creation and annihilation operators do not
preserve particle number. Regarding the Variance, since we are computing in the
vacuum state (a definite particle number state), only the terms which have equal number
of creation and annihilation operators of the same particle will survive the sandwich.
This gives:
X −h̄ωn nπx
⟨0| Ê 2 |0⟩ = â†n ân − ân â†n sin

(10)
n
2ε0 L L
X h̄ωn nπx
= sin (11)
n
2ε 0 L L

Which diverges.

(c) The results of (a) directly imply that


∆A∆Π ≥ (12)
2

=⇒ ∆A∆E ≥ (13)
2ϵ0
(d) Hence there are always fluctuations of electromagnetic fields independent of the
state of the system. In particular, the fluctuation in the vacuum state is maximized
as it is divergent. This may be unphysical and commands efforts to renormalize the
result.

4
3 The Dynamical Casimir Effect in a Moving Cavity
Now, consider the case where the right boundary of the cavity moves periodically:

L(t) = L0 + ϵ cos(Ωt), where ϵ ≪ L0 . (14)

1. Time-Dependent Mode Frequencies:

(a) Derive how the mode frequencies ωn (t) change as a function of time, provide a first order
approximation.
(b) Guess a parametric resonance condition by invoking upon the fact that each mode of
oscillation is equivalent to a harmonic oscillator.

Solution

(a) We proceed as in the static case, only with the introduction of time dependence on
L:
nπc
ωn (t) = 2πf (t) = (15)
L(t)

The first order approximation is:


 
ϵ cos(Ωt)
ωn (t) ≈ ωn0 1 − . (16)
L0

(b) In a classical pendulum, the frequency is proportional to 1/ l, where l is the
string length of the pendulum. If we allow the string length (hence ω) to be perturbed
sinusoidally at twice the natural frequency (pull string at lowest point, release string at
highest point), the system will be experience an injection of energy and the energy of
the pendulum would increase. Accordingly, we can expect this phenomenon to occur
for any system with the same original Hamiltonian (harmonic oscillator), if its new
frequency is dependent on a parameter of order −1/2 that is perturbed at periodicity
twice the natural frequency.
p
In other words, for any harmonic oscillator with frequency ω(t), if ω(t) ∝ 1/ l(t)
and l(t) = l0 + ϵP (Ωt), where ϵ is small and P is a function with period 2π, setting
Ω = 2ω(0) will cause parametric resonance. Then, we expect this property to hold for
a quantum harmonic oscillator by the correspondence principle

Since a sum of normal modes is nothing but a sum of quantum harmonic oscillators,
we expect the systempto have this behavior as well. The only complication is that
instead of a ω(t) ∝ 1/ L(t), we have ω(t) ∝ 1/L(t).
q This though is quickly reconciled
ϵP (t)
if we realize that the Taylor expansion of 1/ 1+ L0 at the first order is nothing
but 1− ϵP (t) 2
2L0 +O(ϵ ). Therefore the parametric resonance condition should be Ω = 2ωn0 .

(c)

2. Bogoliubov Transformation and Photon Creation: The normal mode expansion of the

5
vector potential operator is now modified due to time dependence of L(t) and thus ω(t):
s
X h̄  Rt ′ ′
Rt ′ ′
 nπx
 = ân (t)e−i ωn (t )dt + â†n (t)ei ωn (t )dt sin . (17)
n
2ωn (t)ε 0 L(t) L(t)

The general form of the Hamiltonian is:


Z L(t)  
1 1 2
Ĥ(t) = ϵ0 Ê 2 (x, t) + B̂ (x, t) dx (18)
2 0 µ0

Deriving Ê and B̂ from (17), using the results of part (3.1.a), and inserting it into (18) gives
the following Hamiltonian:
X
h̄ωn0 â†n ân + ih̄gn (t) â†2 2

Ĥ = n − ân (19)
n

ϵ 0
With gn (t) = 2L0 ωk cos(Ωt), and the time dependence of the operators suppressed.

(a) Compute the time evolution of the operators in this Heisenberg picture which results in
the coupled equations:
−iωn0 −ign (t) ân
    
d ân
= (20)
dt â†n ign (t) iωn0 â†n
With solution
(b) Derive an expression for the number of photons created as a function of time.
(c) Show that the photon number grows exponentially when the parametric resonance con-
dition Ω = 2ωn0 is satisfied.

6
Solution

(a) Applying the Heisenberg equation of motion,


d i
âk = [Ĥ, âk ] (21)
dt h̄
d † i
â = [Ĥ, â†k ] (22)
dt k h̄
Using the standard commutators,

[âk , â†k ] = 1, [âk , âk ] = 0, [â†k , â†k ] = 0, (23)


we know that only terms in the sum of the hamiltonian with n = k survive. This gives
us:

[H, âk ] = h̄ωk0 [â†k âk , âk ] + ih̄gk (t)[â†2 2


k − âk , âk ] (24)

Using:

[â†k âk , âk ] = −âk (25)

[â2k , âk ] = −2âk (26)


we get:

[H, âk ] = −h̄ωk0 âk − 2ih̄gk (t)â†k (27)


So
d
âk = −iωk0 âk − 2gk (t)â†k (28)
dt
Similarly,
d †
â = iωk0 â†k + 2gk (t)âk (29)
dt k
Finally, we obtain the coupled system:

−iωn0 −ign (t) ân


    
d ân
= (30)
dt â†n ign (t) iωn0 â†n

3. Energy Extraction from the Vacuum:


(a) Compute the rate of energy extraction from vacuum fluctuations.
(b) Compare this to the total initial zero-point energy of the cavity.
(c) Discuss how this effect relates to spontaneous emission in a static cavity.

Solution

7
r 
X h̄ Rt ′ ′
Rt ′ ′
 nπx
 = ân (t)e−i ωn (t )dt + â†n (t)ei ωn (t )dt sin (31)
n
2 L(t)
 
ϵ cos(Ωt)
ωn (t) ≈ ωn0 1 − , (32)
L0

You might also like