wsu

DATE ---------------------

EXPEREMENT NAME ------------------------------

LOCATION ----------------------------------

TESTED BY ------------------------------------

TABLE:I OBSERVATION SHEET FOR ‘WATER CONTENT’ TEST

Determination No Obs. 1 Obs. 2 Obs. 3
Container number
Weight of container gm
Weight of container + wet soil
gm

Weight of container + dry soil gm

Weight of water (Ww) g

Weight of dry soil (Ws) g
Water content (w) %
Average water content (w) %

1
PREPERED BY :Tamene M. and Amsalu K.
 wsu
DATE ---------------------

EXPEREMENT NAME ------------------------------

LOCATION ----------------------------------

TESTED BY ------------------------------------

TABLE:II DATA COLLECTION SHEET FOR SIEVE ANALYSIS OF SOILS

Sieve Sieve Weight Weight Weight %retained Cumulative %age
no opening of sieve
of sieve of soil % retained passing
(mm) ,gm
+ soil, retained
gm on sieve,
gm

63

37.5

20

4.75

0.043

0.075

pan

2
PREPERED BY :Tamene M. and Amsalu K.
 wsu
DATE ---------------------

EXPEREMENT NAME ------------------------------

LOCATION ----------------------------------

TESTED BY ------------------------------------

TABLE:III LIQUID LIMIT OBSERVATION SHEET

[A] Liquid Limit

Determination No. 1 2 3 4

Can code

Numbers of blows

Mass of can + moist soil,

gm

Mass of can + dry soil, gm

Mass of can, gm

Mass of water, gm

Mass of dry soil, gm

Moisture content, w%

LL (%) =

3
PREPERED BY :Tamene M. and Amsalu K.
 wsu
DATE -------------------

EXPEREMENT NAME ------------------------------

LOCATION ----------------------------------

TESTED BY -----------------------------------

TABLE:IV PLASTIC LIMIT DATA COLLECTION SHEET

[B] Plastic Limit

Determination No. 1 2 3 4

Can code

Numbers of blows

Mass of can + moist soil, gm

Mass of can + dry soil, gm

Mass of can, gm

Mass of water, gm

Mass of dry soil, gm

Moisture content, w

PL (%) =

4
PREPERED BY :Tamene M. and Amsalu K.
 wsu

DATE -------------------

EXPEREMENT NAME ------------------------------

LOCATION ----------------------------------

TESTED BY ----------------------------------

TABLE:V COMPACTION TEST OBSERVATION SHEET

Blows per layer No of layers Weight of
rammer ( kg)
Mold diameter (cm) Height of Volume of
mold(cm) mold(cm^3) =
Trail no. 1 2 3 4 5
weight of mold (gm)
weight wet soil+ mold
(gm)
weight of wet soil (gm)
wet density (gm/ cm^3)
can code
weight of empty can (gm)
weight of wet soil+ can
(gm)
weight of dry soil + can
(gm)
weight of moisture (gm)
weight of dry soil (gm)
Moisture content (w %)
dry density (gm/ cm^3)

5
PREPERED BY :Tamene M. and Amsalu K.
 wsu

DATE -------------------

EXPEREMENT NAME ------------------------------

LOCATION ----------------------------------

TESTED BY -----------------------------------

TABLE:VI CBR TEST FORMAT

Penetration 25 Blows 56 Blows
(mm)
load dial reading, load CBR load dial reading, load CBR
divisions (kN) (%) divisions (kN) (%)
0
0.64
1.27
1.91
2.54
3.18
3.81
4.45
5.08
5.72
6.35
6.99
7.62
8.26
8.89
9.53
10.16
12.5

6
PREPERED BY :Tamene M. and Amsalu K.
 wsu

DATE -------------------

EXPEREMENT NAME ------------------------------

LOCATION ----------------------------------

TESTED BY ----------------------------------

TABLE:VII AGGREGATE GRADATION DATA SHEET

Sieve Wt. of Wt. Of sieve Wt. % Cumulative %
sieve(gm) +retained
size Retained Retained % retained Finer
aggregate
(mm) (gm.)

50

37.5

25

19

14

9.5

6.3

4.75

Pan

Total

7
PREPERED BY :Tamene M. and Amsalu K.
 wsu
DATE -------------------

EXPEREMENT NAME ------------------------------

LOCATION ----------------------------------

TESTED BY -----------------------------------

TABLE:VIII OBSERVATION SHEET FOR FLAKINESS INDEX TEST

Sieves Nominal size Mass of test Mass of aggregate Flakiness index (%),
(mm) portion (gm), Passing through
FI= ( M3/ M2)*100
flakiness gauge(gm),
M2
M3

63-50

50-37.5

37.5-28

28-20

20-14

14-10

10-6.3

TOTAL WEIGHT ΣM2= ΣM3 =

8
PREPERED BY :Tamene M. and Amsalu K.
 wsu
DATE -------------------

EXPEREMENT NAME ------------------------------

LOCATION ----------------------------------

TESTED BY -----------------------------------

TABLE:IX DATA OBSERVATION SHEET FOR ELONGATION INDEX

No: Passing IS Retained on Mass of Mass of Elongation
aggregate
sieve IS sieve aggregate index
retained on
(mm) (mm) retained on the gauge (B/A)*100%
(B)
sieve
(A)

1 63 50

2 50 37.5

3 37.5 28

4 28 20

5 20 14

6 14 10

7 10 6.3

∑A= ∑B= EI (%) =

9
PREPERED BY :Tamene M. and Amsalu K.
 wsu

DATE -------------------

EXPEREMENT NAME ------------------------------

LOCATION ----------------------------------

TESTED BY -----------------------------------

TABLE:X ACV TEST DATA SHEET

S.No Details Trial

1 2

1 Total weight of sample taken (gm)=W1

2 Weight of samples passing through 2.36mm IS sieve

(gm)=W2

3 Aggregatecrushing value= 100%

𝑊1

4 Mean ACV Value

10
PREPERED BY :Tamene M. and Amsalu K.
 wsu
DATE -------------------

EXPEREMENT NAME ------------------------------

LOCATION ----------------------------------

TESTED BY -----------------------------------

TABLE:XI AGGREGATE IMPACT VALUE TEST FORMAT

Test No. 1 2 3 Average

Mass of aggregate before test, passing

14mm and retain 10mm sieves W1(g)

Mass of aggregate after compression, passing

2.36mm sieve

W2(g)

AIV (%) = ( W2/W1 ) x 100

11
PREPERED BY :Tamene M. and Amsalu K.
 wsu
DATE -------------------

EXPEREMENT NAME ---------------------------

LOCATION ----------------------------------

TESTED BY -----------------------------------

TABLE:XII DATA COLLECTION SHEET FOR LAA Test

Test Nominal Grading Revolution No of thermometer Humidity
condition size (mm) rate revolution %

33 500 (ºc) 110±5

Grading test
Sieve Size (mm) Mass of sample Mass of sample before test
passed (gm)
Sample 1 (gm) Sampl2
37.5-25
25-19
19-12.5
12.5-9.5
9.5-6.3
6.3-4.75
4.75-2.36
total

12
PREPERED BY :Tamene M. and Amsalu K.