This document discusses the growth and development of societies through the lenses of anthropology, sociology, and political science, highlighting various cultural approaches such as relativism and ethnocentrism. It explores the evolution of humans and social institutions, detailing key figures like Charles Darwin, Friedrich Engels, and Karl Marx, while also addressing the impact of the Industrial Revolution on social structures. The text emphasizes the interplay between biological, cultural, and technological evolution in shaping human societies and their institutions.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views8 pages
SOC SCIE reviewer
This document discusses the growth and development of societies through the lenses of anthropology, sociology, and political science, highlighting various cultural approaches such as relativism and ethnocentrism. It explores the evolution of humans and social institutions, detailing key figures like Charles Darwin, Friedrich Engels, and Karl Marx, while also addressing the impact of the Industrial Revolution on social structures. The text emphasizes the interplay between biological, cultural, and technological evolution in shaping human societies and their institutions.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8
UNIT 1 CHAPTER 3
SOCIETY AND CULTURE ACCORDING TO UNIT 1 CHAPTER 3
THE THREE DISCIPLINES GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIETIES - Anthropology - considers culture as Among the most interesting and important the central focus of its discipline. questions that social scientists delve into is the - Relativistic Approach - considers origin and nature of society. In explaining the cultures as equal. This view holds that basis of the origins of societies, anthropologist there are no “superior” and “inferior” have focused on the following questions: cultures, and each is unique in its own way. What is the relationship between biological - Ethnocentric Approach- beliefs that factors and cultural behavior? one’s native culture is superior to other Meanwhile, other social scientists, particularly cultures. Tend to have a negative view political scientists and sociologists, inquire about of other countries. society and its various institutions and how - Ethnocentrism - diminishes or these affect human relationship and interaction. invalidates other ways of life and creates a distorted view of one’s own Anthropologist cite three types of Societal - Xenocentrism- have the tendency to Evolution: BIOLOGICAL, CULTURAL, AND consider their culture as inferior to TECHNOLOGICAL others. BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION - Sociology- relates culture with overall context of social order 1.Biological evolution - Structural functionalism- operates - refers to the process whereby organisms on the assumption that society is a undergo various genetic and physical stable and orderly system. changes that pave the way for biological - Conflict theory- assumes that there is diversity. a constant power struggle among the - It refers to the changes, modifications, various social groups and institution and variations in the genetics and within society inherited traits of biological populations - Symbolic Interactions- views of from one generation to another individual and group behavior and social - Scientists study changes in the physical interactions as defining features of body of humans, the changes in the society. shape and size of their bones. - Political Science- examines culture as a vital aspect of society. CHARLES DARWIN - Multiculturalism- ideology that acknowledges and promotes cultural - The evolution of Species happens diversity within society . through the process of Natural Selection - Cultural sensitivity- advances - The reason for occurrence of Evolution awareness and acceptance of cultural - The outcome process that affects the differences but encourages a critical frequencies of truths in a particular stance in dealing with issues regarding environment. Traits that enhance diversity. survival and reproductive success increase in frequency over time. - Suggested that organisms best adjusted - It had both apelike and humanlike to their environment are the most characteristic: successful in surviving and reproducing - A skull similar to Australopithecus and modern humans. NATURAL SELECTION - Height almost similar with chimpanzee -Is a process that results in change within a - Brain size: 320-380 cc species over time. - Small teeth -the process whereby organisms better adapted - Had the ability to walk upright to their environment tend to survive and . Ardipithecus “Ape on the ground” produce more offspring. - 5.6 million years ago - Ardipithecus Kadabba 3 PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL SELECTION - Ardipithecus Ramidus 1.Variations - Height about 4 feet Every species is made up of a variety of - Weight about 120 pounds individuals wherein some are adopted to their - Skull size similar to ape environment compared to other - Small brain 2.Heritability - Bipedal Organism produce progeny with different set of - Lived in jungles and forest like traits that can inherited chimpanzees 3. Differential reproductive success Australopithecus ‘ The Southern Ape “ Organisms that have traits most suitable to their - (5 million-1 million years ago) environment will survive and transfer these - Brain size: 500 cc or almost 1/3 size of variations to their offspring in subsequent modern human brain generation. - Upright - Bipedal Origins and Development of Modern - Tool users not tool makers Humans - Food scavengers AUSTRALOPITHECUS TWO MAJOR How did modern Humans evolved? CATEGORIES: - Gracile Australopithecus EVOLUTION - Robus -A Gradual development of something Australopithecus HOMINIDS The general term used to categorize the group Gracile Australopithecus of early Humans and other humanlike creatures 1.Australopithecus africanus that can walk erect during the prehistoric period. 2.Australopithecus anamensis 3.Australopithecus afarensis-Fossil FOUR CATEGORIES OF HOMINIDS named LUCY(an Australopithecus Afarensis) 1. SAHELANTHROPUS was considered as one of modern humans 2. ARDIPITHECUS earliest ancestors and remains as the most 3. AUSTRALOPITHECUS famous homonid fossil 4. HOMO Robust Australopithecus 1.Australopithecus aethiopicus Sahelanthropus Tchadensis 2. Australopithecus Robustus - 6-7 million years ago 3. Australopithecus boisei Four Categories of Hominids homo sapiens neanderthalensis, they - They are classified as humans and not became smaller in size and the brain humanlike creatures because they had size reduced to 1300 cc. There was also bigger brains and were bipedal a reduction in the size of the jaw, a. Homo habilis (handyman) rounding of the skull and chin. Cro- - 3-4 feet Magnon was the earliest of the Homo - Brain size: 700 cc half size of the sapiens. They spread wider from modern human Europe , Australia, and the Americans. - Made tool called Oldowan They were omnivores, had skilful hands, - Used tool for hunting and food gathering and developed the power of thinking, b. Homo erectus producing art, more sophisticated tools - Large Brain size: 1,000 cc and sentiments - Lived in shelters FRANCISCO JOSE AYALA - Food gatherers - According to Francisco Jose Ayala, a - Crafted Material noted Spanish-American biologist, the - Skilful hunters theory of evolution in biology suggests - Walk upright that “the various types of plants, - First homo species to use fire and live animals, and other living things on earth in cave have their origins in other pre-existing c. Homo sapiens types and the distinguishable - Homo sapiens is the only extant human differences are due to modifications in species. The name Latin for “wise man” successive generations.” and was introduced in 1758 by Carl - Lineages of organisms change through Linnaeus (who is himself the original generations; diversity arises because specimen) the lineages that descend from common - Homo sapiens evolved in Africa like ancestors diverge through time. other early humans that were living at - -In simple terms, biological evolution this time, they gathered and hunted food continues to influence how people live , and evolved behaviors that helped and interact with other members of them respond to the challenges of society. survival in unstable environments. 1.They lived a nomadic lifestyle and engaged 2 Types of Homo Sapiens in hunting and gathering for their livelihood. Eventually, they learned to settle in specific 1.Homo sapiens neanderthalensis areas, particularly in areas that were in close - They had a brain size larger than proximity to rivers, and acquired knowledge in modern man and were gigantic in size. producing their food through agriculture Also, they had a large head and jaw and were very powerful and muscular. They 2. Technological evolution were carnivores and the tools from the as they learned to create various tools and era indicate they were hunters. They equipment for their daily tasks such as planting were also cave dwellers but their caves crops, domesticating animals, and trade. were more comfortable and they lived in groups and hunted for food gathering. Examples - The change from stone tools to metal 2. Homo sapiens sapiens tools - Also known as “modern-day man” is what we are today. Compared to the - The development of industrial - Morgan’s studies were read and used by technologies (steam and electric power) Friedrich Engels in developing a theory - Agricultural and medicinal procedures on the origin of private property and the - Communication resources (internet) state. Taking a close look at early human history, Engels postulated that 3. Meanwhile, anthropologists introduced the the accumulation of private property concept of Biocultural evolution sometime in paved the way for the collapse of the 1970s. primitive communities and the They refer to biocultural evolution as “the mutual establishment of a class-based society. interactive evolution of human biology and Engels later collaborated with Karl Marx culture.” and they came up with the perspective The concept focused on the idea that “biology that social institutions evolve primarily makes culture possible and that developing due to the struggle between social culture further influences the direction of classes over the means of production biological evolution.” It is also considered as “ such as wealth and private property. basic concept in understanding the unique components of human evolution THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL AND POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS The Evolution of Social and Political Institutions - FRIEDRICH ENGELS - KARL MARX Social scientists assert that human beings are social beings. People are naturally inclined to FRIEDRICH ENGELS live together and learn from continuous interaction with one another - Developed a theory on the origin of private property and state LEWIS HENRY MORGAN - Collaborated with Karl Marx - Social institutions evolve primarily due - In the 19th century, the anthropologist to the struggle between social classes Lewis Henry Morgan came up with an over the means of production such as evolutionary scheme that divided history wealth and private property. into three stages of development: savagery, barbarism, and civilization. Capitalism: Marx believed that capitalism is not He stated that the savage stage is the only an economic system but it is also a political stage of development which is system. exemplified by the nomadic and hunter-gatherer lifestyle. Lowest stage Capitalism is an economic system that is based of development on private ownership and motivation by profit. - Barbarians- the middle stage of Marx criticized capitalism for its tendency to development where people began abuse the working man, or “the proletariat. learning agricultural techniques and the domestication of animals. KARL MARX AND FRIEDRICH ENGELS - -Horticulturalists - Civilization- citizens of modern, Capitalist society divided into two classes: stratified states, the civilized stage. The - Bourgeoisie: the name given by Marx highest stage of development where to the owners of the means of people learned writing production in society (wealthier ones) - Proletariat: (poor ones) workers in - He saw social evolution as “a set of society stages through which all the societies moved from simple to the complex and TYPES OF MARXISM from the homogenous to the heterogeneous - Communism- is the end state of having - For Spencer, this law of evolution was key means of production owned in universal in character for it was common (communally) without class. applicable to the physical, organic and First developed by Karl Marx and the social world. Friedrich Engels in the mid-19th century, - “While Spencer believed that social part it has been the foremost ideology of the exists for the social whole, today, society communist movement. a political theory is believed to exist for the welfare of the derived from Karl Marx, advocating individuals. class war and leading to a society in - Individual members within societies which all property is publicly owned and engage in a competition for survival each person works and is paid whereby the superior ones dominate according to their abilities and needs. those who are of the inferior type. - This perspective believes that societies - Socialism: is an intermediate transition cannot be classified according to state where a social revolution (that is, definite stages of development and that of the workers, the vast majority of one society cannot claim to be more society) is required to get to “advanced” than other societies. communism. Additionally, each society and culture - must be analyzed and evaluated In 1848, Marx and fellow German thinker according to its own specific context and Friedrich Engels published “The Communist the influence of outside factors. Manifesto,” which introduced their concept of socialism as a natural result of the conflicts FRANZ BOAS inherent in the capitalist system. - Such perspective came to be known as - MARXISM theorizes that in order to cultural relativism or the notion that remove the proletariat from its poor an individual’s attitudes, beliefs, and economic situation, a socialist revolution ideas are based on the cultural context must occur to remove the unconcerned of his or her society. ruling class from government. - The main proponent of this perspective, - Following the revolution, a new, socialist Franz Boas, argued that human government is created that behavior is not rooted in biology but subsequently becomes communist in socially constructed. nature. - Promoted the idea of cultural relativism, - In the early 20th century, Herbert stating that an anthropologist cannot Spencer applied Charles Darwin’s compare two cultures because each principles of biological evolution to culture has its own internal rules that social evolution. For Spencer, individual must be accepted. Everyone sees other members within societies engage in a cultures through the lens of their own competition for survival whereby the culture. superior ones dominate those who are - Believed that anthropologists must live of the inferior type. among the people they studied, learn their language, observe their culture, and participate in it. transformed leadership roles and gave - The evolution of human beings has the chief more complex responsibilities given rise to the development of social organization from hunting-gathering INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION groups of agricultural communities and industrial societies. - Over time, as societies evolve, social and political institutions developed along - These groups had an example social with the ideas of law, political structure, and social roles were largely leadership, governance, and citizenship. defined by age, sex, and the division of Beginning in the mid-1700s until the labor. For instance, most hunting and 1800s, many societies in the world, gathering societies assigned the task of particularly in Western Europe, were hunting to the men, while women were transformed by the Industrial Revolution. employed in gathering. This event introduced significant social, cultural, and political changes in the - The earliest societies were the lives of the people of Europe hunters-gatherers, and were referred to - Europe was changing from agriculture to as band-level societies or simply factory production “bands.” They were basically small and - Masses of people moved to the cities in nomadic family groups and were plainly search of work organized. These groups were believed - Industrial Revolution challenged the to be highly egalitarian and traditional order an opened the door for non-hierarchical since distinctions were democratic changes based on age and sex, and division of - Social Changes undermined the labor was natural (the men hunted and traditional explanations of human the women gathered). existence
- These changes brought about the Laissez-Faire (let be)
establishment of the tribe. This was a - The principle of nonintervention of more formal social organization made government in economic affairs. It is the up of several bands and groups that heart of the doctrine that the economy were connected through a clan structure works best when left alone by the or kinship. government. - This is usually explained by theory - Additionally, the leader of the tribe or “perfect competition” where prices of headman was a more formal and goods and services not dependent on established leader. He had significant government policies and are set freely influence among the members of the based on the interaction between supply tribe and was recognized as a person of and demand great importance. - Type of style of leadership style in which leaders allow group members to make - Resolving Conflict the decisions. Researchers have found - Took advantage kinship that this is generally the leadership style - The chiefdom consisted of tribes united that leads to the lowest productivity under one leader or chief. among group members. - The more complicated interactions THEORIES ON SOCIETY AND CULTURE among member tribes as well as the - The discussion on the evolution of large populations and territories further societies has given rise to various ideas regarding the origin and nature of society and the state. The following are categories- rule by one, rule by few and rule by the major ideas about the origin and many. nature of society, the formation of the state, and the views about law, SOCIETY AS A PRODUCT OF A SOCIAL governance, and citizenship. CONTRACT
Society as Natural Institution - Another view regarding the nature and
- Aristotle considered the polis or origin of the society and state looks at city-state as the highest form of these institutions as a product of a interaction which fulfills the highest need social contract-an agreement made by of man which is self-sufficiency. For him, the members of society that defines and the polis is the reflection of the natural influences their interactions, particularly order, as the city-state is composed of with those in authority. However, there people who govern and those who are are different ideas regarding the nature governed. of the social contract. The English philosopher, Thomas Hobbes, thought - According to Aristotle, it is the polis that that the agreement was necessitated by is completely natural and enables us to the need to guarantee the security of the meet the needs of human beings in their people. entirety. These needs are not necessarily material or economic needs, - A social contract is an act by which but also moral needs. individuals agree to form government - According to social contract theory, 4 Functions of the Polis as Started by governments established by the people Aristotle who combine to achieve some goal. - A social contract is an act by which 1. Firstly, the polis provides economic individuals agree to form government prerequisites of morality as economic and moral - According to social contract theory, needs are intertwined. In a polis, people can governments established by the people engage in an economic activity only to such an who combine to achieve some goal. extent necessary to meet our needs. - Moral and legal rules to help everyone flourish 2. Secondly, the polis provides educational - Create Property rights- farms flourish conditions upon which the cultivation as well as - Create rules against stealing- realization of moral virtue depends. For Aristotle, investment and industry blossom education is a matter of acquiring habituated - Create militaries and police to enforce modes of behavior through training and rules the fearful natural state dissipates repetition. Education is a virtuous act that enables us to learn. Historical Materialism - Central to Marx’s thought is his 3. Thirdly, the polis provides social preconditions theory of historical materialism, which for our ethical good. This is because it is not in argued that human societies and their our nature to be solitary, nor is it in our nature to cultural institutions (like religion, law, find satisfaction or happiness solely for morality, etc.) were the outgrowth of ourselves and our own interests. collective economic activity. Marx’s theory was heavily influenced by 4. Finally, based on his comparative study, Hegel’s dialectical method. But while Aristotle classified constitutions into three broad Marx agreed with Hegel’s basic dialectical thesis of social change, he disagreed with the notion that abstract administration of any large institution. ideas were the engine. Rather, Marx Max Weber considered bureaucracy as turned Hegel on his head and argued characterized by rationality, that it was material, economic rule-governed behavior, and impersonal forces—or our relationship to the authority. natural, biological, and physical - Bureaucracy refers to a specialized world—that drove the dialectic of system and process of maintaining change. More specifically, the engine of uniformity or authority within an history rests in the internal organization. contradictions in the system of material production (or, the things we do in order Six Principles of Bureaucratic Management to produce what we need for survival). - 1. Proper division of Labor- balance MODERNIZATION THEORIES between power and responsibility - The historical-materialist perspective - 2. Chain of Command- organizational hierarchy, information, decision and What is Historical Materialism? work flows effectively from top to bottom - The way in which societies provide for - 3. Separation of personal and official their material needs conditions the property totality of social relations, institutions, - 4. Application of consistent and and ideas complete rules - Human labor is the foundation of society - 5. Selection and Promotion based on - We must focus on the material activity of qualification humans - 6. Training in job requirements and skills
Dialectic Materialism EMILE DURKHEIM
- Also known as the dialectical method, is a discourse between two or more - Distinguished archaic, traditional people holding different points of view societies from traditional societies about a subject but wishing to establish - If you really want to change society the truth through reasoned arguments. apply it through EDUCATION - Dialectical Materialism is not only a from modern societies. philosophy but also a complete way of - Durkheim described traditional societies thinking to explain reality. to be bound by what he called - mechanical solidarity- sense of MAX WEBER BUREAUCRACY bonding within the community based on - Bureaucratic organization is based upon similar beliefs, values, and activities as a well-defined hierarchy. well as kinship - Hierarchy based on authority. - Organic solidarity- where division of - Every employee in the organization has labor is more specialized a well defined power and authority, - For Durkheim, division of labor based upon employee’s specialization increases the productive capacity and and expertise. skill of the workman. The Division of - The term bureaucracy is a fusion of two Labor also creates a feeling of solidarity words, the French bureau meaning between people. It goes beyond “office” and the Greek word kratos economic interests and establishes meaning “hierarchy”. Literally, social and moral order within society bureaucracy means “rule by officials”. Today, the term refers to the system of