lOMoARcPSD|51262765

Sample Lab Report

Physics (Haramaya University)

Scan to open on Studocu

Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])
 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

Guidelines for a Physics Lab Reports

A laboratory report has three main functions:
(1) To provide a record of the experiments and raw data included in the report,
(2) To provide sufficient information to reproduce or extend the data, and
(3) To analyze the data, present conclusions and make recommendations based on the
experimental work.

General Comments:
The single most important requirement for a laboratory report is clarity. Imagine that your
audience is one of your classmates who missed that experiment.
If you are using a word processor for your lab report, then use the spelling and grammar
checkers. The grammar check can be annoying because often technical sentences are wordy
and complex, but it will help you avoid using too many passive sentences. In general, passive
sentences are less understandable. However, grammar check will not assess clarity, and it will
ignore simple errors. (I do not doubt there are still mistakes in this document I have run it through
spelling and grammar checks.)
Many technical writers prefer to write sentences with passive verbs. A simple example: “The
spring constant k was found from the slope to be 3.02 N/m.” If you run this sentence through the
grammar check, it will tell you that “was found” is a verb in the passive voice. To change this to
an active voice you could write: “The spring constant k is the slope, 3.02 N/m.” Not every
sentence has to be in an active voice. What you want is a report that is readable.

Lab Report Structure:

I. Cover Sheet: This page has the course number and assigned lab section, the title of the
experiment, your name, your lab partner’s names, the date that the lab was performed and
your TA’s name.
II. Abstract: The purpose of an abstract in a scientific paper is to help a reader decide if your
paper is of interest to him/her. (This section is the executive summary in a corporation or
government report; it is often the only section that a manager reads.)
The abstract should be able to stand by itself, and it should be brief. Generally, it consists of
three parts which answer these questions:
ƒ What did you do? – A statement of the purpose of the experiment, a concise
description of the experiment and physics principles investigated.
ƒ What were your results? – Highlight the most significant results of the experiment.
ƒ What do these results tell you? – Depending on the type of experiment, this is
conclusions and implications of the results or it may be lessons learned form the
experiment.
Write the abstract after all the other sections are completed. (You need to know everything in
the report before you can write a summary of it.)
III. Data Sheets: For each experiment, the lab manual has one or more data sheets for
recording raw data, as well as, intermediate and final data values. These are not for doodling,
but for recording your data. Record the data neatly in pen. If your data values are so sloppily
recorded that you have to recopy them, then the accuracy of the data is questionable. This
fact will be reflected in your laboratory performance score. If there is a mistake, then draw a
single line through that value. “White-Out” and similar covering agents are expressly
forbidden.

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

The values that you record on your data sheet must have:
ƒ Units (such as kg for kilograms)
ƒ Reasonable uncertainty estimates for given instruments and procedures
ƒ Precision consistent with uncertainty (proper significant digits)
ƒ Propagation of error for calculated quantities
ƒ Your lab instructor’s initials.

If you happen to forget your lab manual, then you will take your data on notebook paper.
Your lab instructor will initial that as your data sheet and you will turn that in with your lab
report as well as your own data sheet from the lab manual. You may not use your lab
partner’s datasheet and then make a photocopy.

IV. Graphs: You must follow the guidelines in the lab manual for all graphs. The first graphs of
the semester must be made by hand, not computer software. After your lab instructor gives
permission, you may use computer software to make graphs. Those graphs must also
conform to the guidelines in the lab manual. Remember that when plotting data with units,
both the slope and intercept of a graph also have units.
V. Sample Calculations: Show calculations in a neat and orderly outline form. Include a brief
description of the calculation, the equation, numbers from your data substituted into the
equation and the result. Do not include the intermediate steps. Numbers in the sample
calculations must agree with what you recorded in your data sheet. For calculations
repeated many times, you only include one sample calculation. Answers should have the
proper number of significant figures and units. (It is not necessary to show the calculation for
obtaining an average, unless your TA requests that you do so.)
Typing the equation into the lab report is not required; it is easier and faster to print these
calculations neatly by hand. If you wish to type this section, then use the equation editor in
Microsoft Word. Your lab instructor can give you information on using the equation editor.
VI. Discussion of Results: This is the most important part of the lab report; it is where you
analyze the data. (In the future, you may not actually collect data; a lab technician or other
people may collect the raw data. Regardless of your discipline, the most challenging and
rewarding part of your work will be analyzing the data.)
Begin the discussion with the experimental purpose and briefly summarize the basic idea of
the experiment with emphasis on the measurements you made and transition to discussing
the results. State only the key results (with uncertainty and units) quantitatively with numerical
values; do not provide intermediate quantities. Your discussion should address questions
such as:
ƒ What is the relationship between your measurements and your final results?
ƒ What trends were observable?
ƒ What can you conclude from the graphs that you made?
ƒ How did the independent variables affect the dependent variables? (For example,
did an increase in a given measured (independent) variable result in an increase or
decrease in the associated calculated (dependent) variable?)
Then describe how your experimental results substantiate/agree with the theory. (This is not
a single statement that your results agree or disagree with theory.) When comparison values
are available, discuss the agreement using either uncertainty and/or percent differences.
This leads into the discussion of the sources of error.
In your discussion of sources of error, you should discuss all those things that affect your
measurement, but which you can't do anything about given the time and equipment
constraints of this laboratory. Included in this would be a description of sources of error in
your measurement that bias your result (e.g. friction in pulleys that are assumed frictionless in

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

the formula). Your analysis should describe the qualitative effect of each source of error (e.g.
friction slowed motion, causing a smaller value of acceleration to be measured) and, where
possible, provide an estimate of the magnitude of the errors they could induce. Describe
only the prominent sources of error in the experiment. For example, the precision of the triple
balance beam, a fraction of a gram, compared to the 250.0 g lab cart is not significant. Note
that a tabulation of all possible errors without any discussion of qualitative effect of the error
will receive no credit. Your discussion should address questions such as:
ƒ Are the deviations due to error/uncertainty in the experimental method, or are they due to
idealizations inherent in the theory (or both)?
ƒ If the deviations are due to experimental uncertainties, can you think of ways to decrease
the amount of uncertainty?
ƒ If the deviations are due to idealizations in the theory, what factors has the theory
neglected to consider? In either case, consider whether your results display systematic
or random deviations.
A conclusion is not required in the rubric. You will not lose points for leaving this out.
However, in order to receive the points for a very well written report in Achievements and
Flaws, a brief conclusion is recommended.

Considerations: These are not questions to be answered as a separate part of the lab report.
They are hints. They are things for you to think about. Some of them should be addressed in
your lab report. Not because your TA says to do so, but because it adds depth to your
discussion. You are never to simply list answers to considerations.

Endnotes:
The report should not be a big production. It should not take hours to write. The objective is to
write down the significant details of the experiment, the analysis of the experimental data. A few
neatly written pages, including your data sheets will suffice for most experiments. Hopefully the
sample lab report that follows will help you.

Note:
1. No student should copy data from anyone who is not his or her lab partner.
2. You may discuss the experiment with your lab partner and other classmates, but the lab
report that you turn in must be your own work. Lab reports are subject to all the rules
governing academic honesty.
3. Photocopies of any parts of the lab report are not permissible.

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

Hooke’s Law Experiment

Objective: To measure the spring constant of a spring using two different methods.

Background: If a weight, W = mg, is hung from one end of an ordinary spring, causing
it to stretch a distance x, then an equal and opposite force, F, is created in the spring
which opposes the pull of the weight. If W is not so large as to permanently distort the
spring, then this force, F, will restore the spring to its original length after the load is
removed. The magnitude of this restoring force is directly proportional to the stretch,

F = -kx

The constant k is called the spring constant. To emphasize that x refers to the change in
length of the spring we write
F = mg = - k ∆ l (1)

In this form it is apparent that if a plot of F as a function of ∆ l has a linear portion, this
provides confirmation that the spring follows Hooke's Law and enables us to find k.

An additional approach is possible. One definition of simple harmonic motion is that it is

motion under a linear, “Hooke's Law” restoring force. Note that for simple harmonic
motion, the period does not depend upon the amplitude of the oscillation. For such a
motion, we have
T 2 = 4π 2 m / k (2)
where k again is the spring constant, T is the period of the pendulum and m is the mass that
is oscillating. Thus, the mass includes the mass of the spring itself. However, the entire
spring does not vibrate with the same amplitude as the load (the attached mass) and
therefore it is reasonable to assume that the effective load (m) is the mass hung from the
end of the spring plus some fraction of the mass of the spring. Based on similar
experiments, one third of the mass of the spring is a good estimation of the effective load
due to the spring, thus
1
m = mload + mes = mload + mspring
3

where mes is the effective load of the spring. Using this in Eq. (2), we find

4π 2 {mload + 1/ 3(mspring )}
k= (3)
T2

The effective load of the spring can be determined for a particular spring using the following
process. The equation for T2 can be written in terms of mload and mes ; mes can then be
determined from a graph of T2 versus mload. Note that this assumes that mes is constant.

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

Eq (3) uses an approximation for the contribution of the mass of the spring to the
oscillation. If we rewrite Eq (2) as the effective mass of the spring and hanging mass
(load), then
4π 2 4π2 m ES
T 2 = 4π2 ( mload + m ES ) / k = mload + (4)
k k
where mload is the hanging mass and mES is the effective mass of the spring. If we assume
that the effective spring mass is the same for all loads, then a graph of period squared (T2)
vs. hanging mass (mload) is a straight line, where 4π2/k is the slope and 4π2mES/k is the
intercept.

Procedure:
Part 1
1. Hang a spring from a horizontal metal rod.
2. Attach a mass hanger directly to the bottom of the hanging
spring and record the position of the bottom of the mass
Meter Stick

hanger relative to a meter stick.

3. Add masses to the spring and record the position of the bottom
of the mass hanger.

Part 2
1. Hang a mass from the spring and use a stopwatch to time 15
oscillations of the mass and spring.
2. Repeat for other masses.

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

Assemble report using a

staple in the upper left corner.

Physics 1408 Section A1

HOOKE’S LAW AND A SIMPLE SPRING

Your Name
A lab report
should include a
Partner(s): Full Name(s) title page like this
one, with all of the
Date Performed: October 21, 2005 appropriate
information.

TA: Full Name

Abstract
Two experiments were performed to find the spring constant of a steel spring. The spring
constant was determined statically, by measuring its elongation when subjected to
loading, and dynamically, by measuring the period of a mass hung from one end and set
into vertical oscillation. The resulting values of 2.94 ± 0.01 N/m and 2.98 ± 0.02 N/m,
respectively. Our spring's behavior followed Hooke's law to within the limits of accuracy
of the two experiments. (76 words)

An Alternate Abstract:
The purpose of this experiment was to measure and compare the spring constant of a steel
spring using two different procedures. First we investigated the relationship between the
force applied to a spring and the displacement of the spring from its rest length. We
hung various masses from the springs, and measured the vertical displacement. We found
a spring constant of 2.94 ± 0.01 N/m. Our results confirmed Hooke’s Law, Fs = -kx. In
the second procedure, we set the spring into vertical oscillation with a suspended mass
and measured the period of oscillation. Using this method, we found a spring constant of
2.98 ± 0.02 N/m. Our results verified that the period of oscillation depended on the
effective mass of the spring and the period of oscillation. (128 words)

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

A Poor Abstract – Too long because it has too much detail and unnecessary
information. (The worst problems are in italics.)
The purpose of this experiment was to determine the spring constant k of a steel spring
using two different methods. First we investigated the relationship between the force
applied to a spring and the displacement of the spring from its rest length in order to
verify Hooke’s law. We hung masses of 0.01 kg, 0.20 kg, 0.30 kg, 0.04 kg, 0.05 kg, 0.06
kg, 0.70 kg, and 0.80 kg from the springs, and recorded the vertical displacements. We
made four measurements for each mass hung from the spring and used the average of the
four values in order to reduce random error. In this method, the main cause of error was
measurement. We found a spring constant of k = 2.94 ± 0.01 N/m. Our results confirmed
Hooke’s Law, the well known relationship that the magnitude of an elastic restoring
force on a spring is directly proportional to the displacement of the spring. This
relationship is named after the 17th century scientist Hooke who studied it. Next we
measured the period of a mass hung from one end of a spring and set into vertical
oscillation. We performed this process using the four different masses 0.145 kg, 0.105
kg, 0.055 kg, and 0.025kg. The period of each mass was measured three times using
three different amplitudes of oscillation. We found that the spring constant depended on
the effective mass of the spring and the period of oscillation. The period of the motion
was the same whether the amplitude of the oscillation is large or small. In this method,
the main cause of error was reaction time. Using this method we found a spring constant
of 2.98 ± 0.02 N/m. This value is consistent with the result obtained using the first
method. (291 words)

Remember to be concise.

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

Name: ____Your Name________ Date:__Date Exp. Performed

Partner: ___Partners Full Name__
You can
include
TA’s Initials on data sheet Hooke’s Law and a Simple Spring uncertainty
for a tool
Part 1 such as a
Table 1 meter stick
Position Location of the Mass Hanger Reference in cm ±0.05cm in the top
Uncertainty Mass of a data
can be (g) table.
written as a Trial 1 Trial2 Trial 3 Trial 4
±1%
percentage.
Reference 0 69.55 69.50 69.50 69.50 If the value
1 1 69.27 69.19 69.18 69.17 is four sig
2 3 68.61 68.50 68.53 68.52 figs then
3 5 67.95 67.87 67.88 67.86 include the
4 10 66.42 66.20 66.21 66.20 trailing 0.
5 20 62.90 62.89 62.90 62.93
6 40 56.32 56.22 56.30 56.23 If you drop
7 60 49.65 49.60 49.61 49.6 that zero
8 80 42.97 42.97 42.95 42.95 then it is 3
9 100 36.32 36.30 36.32 36.32 sig figs!
10 120 29.63 29.70 29.72 29.72 This should
11 140 23.07 23.05 23.10 23.12 have been
49.60!
For the Table 2
subtraction
all the Force Displacement ( x10-2m ) Spring
uncertainties (N) Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 Average Constant
were the ±1% ±0.07 ±0.07 ±0.07 ±0.07 (N/m )
same; thus it
was put in 0.00981 -0.28 -0.36 -0.37 -0.38 -0.35 ± 0.02 2.8 ± 0.2
the top of a 0.0294 -0.94 -1.05 -1.02 -1.03 -1.01± 0.02 2.91± 0.08
column; that 0.0491 -1.60 -1.68 -1.67 -1.69 -1.66± 0.02 2.96± 0.05
was not 0.0981 -3.13 -3.35 -3.34 -3.35 -3.29± 0.05 2.98± 0.05
possible for
0.196 -6.65 -6.66 -6.65 -6.62 -6.65± 0.01 2.95± 0.03
the average.
0.392 -13.23 -13.33 -13.25 -13.32 -13.28± 0.02 2.95± 0.03
Do you 0.589 -19.90 -19.95 -19.94 -19.95 -19.94± 0.01 2.95± 0.03
know why 0.785 -26.58 -26.58 -26.60 -26.60 -26.59± 0.01 2.95± 0.03
there are 0.981 -33.23 -33.25 -33.23 -33.23 -33.24± 0.01 2.95± 0.03
only 2 sig 1.18 -39.92 -39.85 -39.83 -39.83 -39.86± 0.02 2.95± 0.03
figs here?
1.37 -46.48 -46.50 -46.45 -46.43 -46.47± 0.02 2.96± 0.03

Average Spring Constant k = __2.94 ± 0.01 N/m _

Spring Constant k from Graph = __ 2.95 N/m ________

Calculate the standard error.

There is a way to find the uncertainty for slopes of

graphs, but we will not do that in this course.

Remember to include units and uncertainty.

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

Name: ____Your Name________ With 1% uncertainty in

the slotted masses, the
Part 2: uncertainty for 145g is
Cross out mistakes ±1g and for 55g, it is
Mass of spring = 10.19 ± 0.02 x 10-3 kg____ ±0.06g; thus for the
with a single line; do
not use white-out. smallest two loads, can be
written in the form below.
Table 3
Load (x10-3 kg)
145 105 55.0 25.0
(mass of spring) ±1%
Do not cross
Time for Trial 1 out mistakes
20 27.94 23.98 17.60 12.32
(small) this way!
oscillations
Trial 2 Sometimes
27.79 24.06 17.44 12.56 12.40
(s) (medium) what you had
Trial 3 was correct.
27.90 23.95 17.34 12.03 12.34 You may
±0.08 (large)
want to be
Average able to read
27.88 ± 0.04 24.00± 0.03 17.46± 0.08 12.35± 0.02
20 oscillations (s) it.
Period (s) 1.394± 0.002 1.200± 0.002 0.873± 0.004 0.618± 0.001

Period 2 (s2) 1.943 ± 0.006 1.440 ± 0.004 0.762± 0.007 0.382 ± 0.001

k from Eq. (3) (N/m) 3.01 ± 0.03 2.97± 0.03 3.02± 0.04 2.94± 0.03

Average Spring Constant k = __ 2.98± 0.02 N/m_ Period was 12.35s/20= 0.6175s
Uncertainty was 0.001; thus we
write the period with 3 sig figs
Spring Constant k from Graph = __ 3.01 N/m_ (0.618)

Spring’s Effective Mass from Graph = __0.0040 kg

% Difference between k in Part 1 and Part 2 = _ 2 %_ k in parts 1 and 2 was 3 sig figs;
but the difference between the
two values is one sig fig!!!!

Remember to include an uncertainty!

Guessing and then seeing what the value is for the average of a small number of trials helps build your ability to
predict uncertainty.
Why 0.08 in this case? One way to measure your reaction time is to have a friend hold a meter stick vertically
between your thumb and first finger; note the cm mark between your fingers; the friend drops the meter stick, and
you catch it. Determine how far it fell before your caught it. Since it had no initial velocity and the only force
acting on the meter stick is gravity, then d=½gt2. For most people, the distance the meter stick falls is about 15 cm.
However, there is a difference between someone dropping a meter stick and timing an oscillating object. When
timing an object, we can observe the motion and use the rhythm to reduce reaction time error. This might reduce
the timing error to a third of the original value: treaction time/3 = sqrt(2d/g)/3 = 0.06 s
However, there are two uncertainties – starting the stopwatch and stopping the stopwatch; thus, we need to
propagate the error. ∆t = sqrt(∆tstart + ∆tstart) = ∆treaction time sqrt(2) = 0.08s
We might have made a different assumption, then we might have used had a value or 0.05 to 1.0 s.

Remember to include units and uncertainty

9

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

Restoring Force vs. Displacement Magnitude

1.4

Force = 2.95x - 0.0001

x = displacemnt

1.2
Not all graphs will start at zero as this
one does. If your data range for the y-
axis is from 6 to 20 newtons, then use a
graph that starts at 5 and ends on 20 or 25
newtons.

1.0 Never force a line to go through the

origin. NEVER!!

Your TA may have other information

that he/she wants on a graph. Then be
sure to include that.
0.8
Force (N)

0.6 Graphs must conform to all the rules

given in lab handbook.

Each graph should be on a separate page.

This graph was inserted into this Word

document by a simple “copy and paste”
0.4
from Excel into Word.

Note that for the first one or two

experiments each semester you will be
required to make your graphs by hand.
After you demonstrate an ability to make
0.2 a graph by hand, then you may use
computer software to make your graphs.

0.0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
Displacement Magnitude (m)
10

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

This title is incorrect!

Mass vs. Time Squared Do you know why?
3

y = 13.09x + 0.052
If you use Excel then edit x and y so it looks like this
T2 = 13.09M +.052

2.5

y = 13.566x
Dashed curve forced to intercept the origin
Do not force a curve!
Error bars were added to this graph to show that
when the curve was forced to go through the origin
it then did not honor the data collected.
2
2
Time

1.5

Do not use the default backgound

color, use white. It can be difficult
to see data points when printed.

1
Add gridlines for both axes, not just the default as
in this plot.

Scale the graph so that the data is spread across

the graph. This graph has too much unused
space.

0.5
Since there are two graphs - each is worth 5
points. I would give this graph only 2 points out
of 5.

0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2
Mass

11

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

Restoring Force vs. Displacement

1.6

Force = 2.9541x - 0.0001

1.4

1.2

1.0
Force (N)

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

Do not do this !
0.0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50

Displacement (m)
One graph per page. Not two
or more per page and not
embedded in text.
Time squared vs. Mass

2.5

T2 = 13.09M + 0.052

1.5
(s2)
Time2

0.5

0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18
Mass (kg)

12

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

Sample Calculations
1. Displacement: the length that the spring is stretched
x = Displacement = Location with Mass 1 (0.010kg) - Reference Location
x = 66.42 × 10−2 m − 69.55 × 10−2 m = −3.13 × 10−2 m

2. Uncertainty of displacement (∆ l): Propagation of error for addition and subtraction

∆ x = (uncertainty in reference)2 + (uncertainty in location 1) 2
∆ x = (0.05 × 10-2 m )2 + (0.05 × 10-2 m)2
∆ x = 0.07 × 10-2 m

3. Force on spring from the hanging mass

F = mg
F = (10.0 g )(1kg /1000 g )(9.81m / s 2 ) = 0.0981 N

4. Standard Error for Average Displacement for 0.9811N force

Standard Error =
∑ (x -x)
i
2

( N − 1) N
∆ x = {[(−3.13 × 10 m − (−3.29 × 10-2 m))2 + (−3.35 × 10-2 m − (−3.29 × 10-2 m))2
-2

+ (−3.34 × 10-2 m − (−3.29 × 10-2 m))2 + (−3.35 × 10-2 m − (−3.29 × 10-2 m))2 ] /[(4 − 1)4]}1/ 2
∆ x = 0.05 × 10−2 m

5. Using Hooke’s Law (F = - kx) to find the spring constant No units! No credit would be given
k = −F / x for this sample calculation.
k = −0.0981/(−3.29 × 10−2 ) = 2.98

6. Spring constant uncertainty: Propagation of error for multiplication and division

∆ k = k (∆F/F) 2 + (∆ x/x)2
2
⎛ 0.05 × 10−2 m ⎞
2
⎛ 0.01 × 0.0981N ⎞
∆ k = 2.98N/m ⎜ ⎟ + ⎜ −2 ⎟ = 0.05 N/m
⎝ 0.0981N ⎠ ⎝ 3.29 × 10 m ⎠

7. Spring constant from period of oscillation

4π 2 {mload + 1/ 3(mspring )}
k=
T2
k = 4(3.14) 2 (145 × 10−3 kg +
1
3
(10.19 × 10−3 kg ) / (1.392s )
2
)
k = 3.01 N/m

13

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

8. Spring constant uncertainty: propagation of error for T2

∆A = nA(∆T/T) where A= T n n = 2
∆ T = 2(1.394s) 2 (.002s/1.394s)= 0.006 s 2

9. Spring constant from the slope from T2 vs. Mload graph

(2π ) 2 (2π ) 2
slope = k=
k slope
(2 × 3.14) 2
k= = 3.01N / m
13.09s 2 /kg

10. Spring’s Effective Mass, MES, from the intercept

(2π ) 2 M ES
Intercept = M ES = ( k × Intercept ) /(2π ) 2
k
M ES = ( 3.01N/m × 0.052s 2 ) /(2 × 3.14) 2 = 0.0040 kg

11. % difference for spring constant k

Measured Value1- Measured Value 2
% difference = × 100%
Measured Value1+Measured Value 2 / 2
2.94N/m - 2.98N/m
% difference = × 100% = 1%
2.94N/m + 2.98N/m / 2

14

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

Discussion
(One to three sentences are enough to introduce what was done. The procedure is in the lab
manual. Do not rewrite the procedure. More than that is wasting your time and the lab
instructor’s time.) In part 1, a spring was hung vertically with a mass hanger attached to the
lower end of the spring, and masses from 1g to 140g were added. The downward location of
the spring was measured once it came to rest. (A succinct explanation of the physics principle
used in the experiment.) In this configuration, two equal and opposite forces acted on the
hanging mass: gravity directed downward and the spring’s elastic restoring force directed
upward, in the opposite direction of displacement. Using Hooke’s Law (F = -kx), a spring
constant was calculated for each measurement. (How the result demonstrated a physics
principle.) The spring constants for each value of displacement are the same, within
experimental uncertainty (Table 2), which verifies Hooke’s law. (Only the important result is
provided. Not a list of each and every number on the data sheet. Note that final numerical
values include an estimate of uncertainty.) The average spring constant is 2.94±0.01 N/m.

(Analysis of graph: shape of curve, for a straight line, the meaning of slope and intercept for
your graph.) A graph of force versus the magnitude of displacement resulted in the expected
straight line in the range of forces examined and is consistent with Hooke’s law. The slope
of this line, 2.95 N/m, is the spring constant, which agrees with value found by taking the
average of the calculated spring constant (2.94±0.01 N/m). (You do not have to explain how
they agree if you show the numbers or refer to a Table; but do not write that values agree
without some reference.) The intercept for the best fit straight line intersects close to the
origin, which is also consistent with Hooke’s law.

(Sources of error are offered that are consistent with the experimental results.) The sources
of error in this part of the experiment are due to the precision of the location measurement
using the meter stick and the accuracy of the slotted masses. The meter stick was mounted
vertically and behind the spring. The location was measured relative to the base of the mass
hanger. Effort was made to sight the measurements directly; however, because of the
location of the meter stick it was necessary to view the meter stick at a slight angle.
However, this sighting was required for each measurement, and the displacement was the
difference between the location and the reference. Thus, this systematic error due to parallax
should be minimal. However the random error of measurement precision remains. For
displacements 20 cm or more, the uncertainty of the displacement of the spring is 0.5 % or
less and has little impact on the uncertainty of k; in those cases the 1% uncertainty in the
slotted masses has the greatest contribution to the uncertainty of k. However, for small
displacements the displacement uncertainty has the largest impact on the uncertainty in k.
For example, the 1.0 g mass displaced the spring by -0.0035 ± 0.0002 m, a relative
uncertainty of 6%. (You may offer a suggestion for improving the experiment, but it must
focus on the most prominent error and be consistent with the sources of errors. This is not a
place to “trash” the experiment.) Using a motion sensor to measure distance would increase
the precision for small displacements.

(A brief introduction to part 2.) In Part 2, we determined k dynamically using the period of
an oscillating mass. The time for twenty oscillations was measured for five different masses;
for each mass the period of oscillation was measured three times using different oscillation
amplitudes, as suggested by out lab instructor. (A succinct explanation of the physics
15

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

principle used in the experiment.) The period of a mass oscillating vertically on a spring
depends on the spring constant and the mass of the oscillating object, but not on the
amplitude of the oscillation. (How the result demonstrated a physics principle.) Our
measurements confirmed that the amplitude of oscillation, within experimental uncertainty,
did not affect period (Table 3),

To reduce the reaction time, we observed the motion and used the rhythm to start and stop
the stopwatch. (How the independent variables affected the dependent variables.) For small
masses, the period of the oscillation is shorter; this is consistent with Eq (2). These shorter
periods for the 55g and 25g masses made accuracy in the timing both critical and difficult.
The measured times for 20 oscillations of the 55g mass are not as consistent as for the other
masses. This was the result of reaction time random error. Two measurements for 20
oscillations of the 25g mass were so different from the other measurements that we made
additional measurements and replaced those data points. There was another complication for
these smaller mass, large amplitude oscillations caused the slotted masses to bounce on the
mass hanger. This meant that we had to use smaller amplitude differences between the large
and small amplitude oscillations for the smaller masses.

(You may need to combine two equations.) Using Eq (3), we found k for the four different
loads added to the spring. The four values of k for the four different masses were in
agreement (Table 3). The average value of k is 2.98±0.02 N/m. (Always include units; 2.98±
0.02 without units would be meaningless.)

(Analysis of graph.) A graph of T2 vs. Mload is a straight line and consistent with the theory
that the period is a function of the effective mass of the spring and the spring constant of the
spring, Eq, (4). (Important results.) The spring constant k from the slope is 3.01 N/m; the
effective mass of the spring MES from the intercept of the best fit line is 4.0g, which is
approximately 40% of the mass of the spring, which is somewhat higher than the fraction
used in Eq. (3).

The sources of error in this part of the experiment are due to the accuracy of the slotted
weights and the accuracy of the time measurements. (There is no need to repeat what you
have already discussed.) As mentioned previously, the reaction time uncertainty is greater
for the smaller loads. However, due to the care that taken in the time measurements and the
fact that 20 different oscillations were measured, the uncertainty in the time measurements
was not as important in this experiment as the uncertainty in the slotted masses. There is
uncertainty (1%) in the mass of the slotted weights. It would have been prudent to have
measured the masses on the triple beam balance so that we would have less uncertainty in the
mass of the oscillating weights; however, we did not make those measurements.

The value of the spring constant found in Part 1 (2.94±0.01 N/m) and Part 2 (2.98± 0.02
N/m) do not agree. (Discuss how results agree using either uncertainty and/or percent
differences.)However, the percent difference between the two values is only 1%. One possible
explanation for the small discrepancy may be that the time measurements were precise, but
not accurate due to a systematic error in the timing. If our time measurements of the twenty
oscillations were low by as little as 0.05s, then the spring constant values would agree.

16

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])

 lOMoARcPSD|51262765

(A brief conclusion.) Besides measuring the spring constant using two very different
methods, we verified Hooke’s law, verified the linear relationship between period squared
and load for a vertically oscillating spring, and observed that the amplitude of the oscillations
did not affect the period.

Answers to Questions (if any): Answer questions in complete, grammatically correct

sentences.

17

Downloaded by Kuyna Kulucho ([email protected])