0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views

Eco 101 Lecture Two_114704

Uploaded by

abelmary80
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views

Eco 101 Lecture Two_114704

Uploaded by

abelmary80
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

TEN PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS

The phrase “ten principles of economics" refers to a set of foundational concepts that are used to
analyze and understand economic behavior and decision-making. The are a foundational set of
concepts in economics that explain how individuals and societies make decisions regarding
scarce resources. These principles were popularized by economist Gregory Mankiw in his book
"Principles of Economics" and are widely taught in introductory economics courses. The ten
principles provide a framework for examining various aspects of economics, including individual
decision-making, interactions between individuals and markets, and the overall functioning of
the economy. They cover topics such as trade-offs, opportunity cost, incentives, market
efficiency, government intervention, productivity, inflation, and unemployment. The purpose of
these principles is to help individuals develop a basic understanding of economic concepts and
reasoning. By applying these principles, individuals can make more informed decisions, analyze
economic events and policies, and gain insights into how individuals, firms, and governments
interact within the economy. The principles are categorized into three thus:

Group 1: Principles related to individual decision-making: The first group of principles look
at the individuals in the society with the intention of understanding they make decisions of
economic nature. This is divided into four principles.
1. People face tradeoffs
2. The cost of something is what you give up to get it
3. Rational people think at the margin
4. People respond to incentives
Group 2: Principles related to interactions between individuals: The second group of
principles look at the interaction of individuals in the society. The aim is to examine the role of
markets, trade, and government interventions in economic activities. This is divided into:

5. Trade can make everyone better off

6. Markets are usually a good way to organize economic activity

7. Governments can sometimes improve market outcomes


Group 3: Principles related to the economy as a whole: This third group of principles look at
the behaviour of the whole society. What happens to the whole economy has an effect on
individuals and their interaction. Under this group, we have the following:
8. The standard of living depends on a country’s production

9. Prices rise when the government prints too much money

10. Society faces a short-run tradeoff between inflation and unemployment


EXPLANATIONS:
1. People face trade-offs: This principle recognizes that individuals often have limited
resources, such as time, money, or energy, and therefore, they must make choices and
trade-offs between different alternatives. To get one thing, we usually have to give up
another thing e.g. – Food vs. clothing, Leisure time vs. work, Efficiency vs. equity.
Efficiency means society gets the most it can from its scarce resources. Equity means the
benefits of those resources are distributed fairly among the members of society. If you
choose to spend your money on a vacation, for example, you are forgoing the opportunity
to invest that money or purchase other goods and services. This principle highlights the
concept of opportunity cost, which refers to the value of the next best alternative that is
forgone when making a decision.
2. The cost of something is what you give up to get it: This principle emphasizes that the
cost of acquiring something is not limited to its monetary price, but also includes the
alternative options that must be sacrificed to obtain it. For instance, if you decide to
attend a concert, the cost includes not only the ticket price but also the time and potential
enjoyment you could have derived from engaging in other activities during that time.
Understanding the full cost of a decision helps individuals make more informed choices.
3. Rational people think at the margin: This principle suggests that individuals make
decisions by comparing the additional benefits and costs of incremental changes or units.
Rational individuals weigh the pros and cons of each additional unit or small change
before taking decision. For example, a rational consumer may decide whether to purchase
an additional unit of a product based on the marginal utility (satisfaction) they expect to
derive from it compared to its marginal cost. economic actions. By “marginal” we mean
small changes to an existing plan of action. People therefore take decision only when
marginal/additional benefit is greater than marginal cost.
4. People respond to incentives: This principle recognizes that individuals are motivated
by incentives, which can be rewards or penalties that influence their behavior. When
incentives change, people adjust their decisions and actions accordingly. For instance, if
the government introduces tax incentives for purchasing electric vehicles, it can
encourage individuals to switch from conventional cars to electric ones. Understanding
how incentives shape behavior is crucial for policymakers and businesses to design
effective policies and strategies.
5. Trade can make everyone better off: This principle recognizes that voluntary trade
between individuals or countries can lead to mutual benefits. People gain from their
ability to trade with one another. If there is competition in trading, then every party gains
from trade. Trade allows people to specialize in what they do best. Specialisation is the
key to modern society. It makes possible higher levels of productivity leading to the high
levels of income that modern societies enjoy. When individuals specialize in producing
goods or services in which they have a comparative advantage (the ability to produce a
good at a lower opportunity cost), and then engage in trade with others, both parties can
obtain a greater variety of goods and services at lower costs. Trade allows for the
efficient allocation of resources and can lead to increased economic welfare for all
participants.
6. Markets are usually a good way to organize economic activity: This principle
suggests that competitive markets, tend to allocate resources efficiently. In a market with
many buyers and sellers, prices act as signals of scarcity and guide the allocation of
resources. Market competition incentivizes producers to maximize efficiency, minimize
costs, and improve product quality. This leads to productive efficiency (achieving the
maximum output from available resources) and allocative efficiency (allocating resources
to produce goods and services that align with consumer preferences). However, it is
important to note that markets may not always be perfectly efficient, and there may be
market failures requiring intervention.
7. Governments can sometimes improve market outcomes: If markets fail (break down),
government can intervene to promote efficiency and equity. Market failure occurs when
the market cannot allocate resources efficiently. Market failure may be caused by an
externality, which is the impact of one person or firm’s actions on the well-being of a
bystander. Market failure may also be caused by market power, which is the ability of a
single person or firm to unduly influence market prices. This principle recognizes that
while markets are generally efficient, there are instances where government intervention
can lead to better outcomes. Governments have the ability to correct market failures, such
as externalities (spillover effects on third parties not involved in the transaction) and
public goods (goods with non-excludable and non-rivalrous characteristics). Additionally,
governments can address issues of income inequality, ensure fair competition, regulate
monopolies, and provide public goods and services that may not be adequately provided
by the market alone.
8. A country's standard of living depends on its ability to produce goods and services:
This principle highlights the importance of a country's productivity and its ability to
efficiently produce goods and services. The standard of living of a nation is determined
by its real GDP (gross domestic product) per capita, which is influenced by factors such
as technological advancements, human capital development (education and skills),
infrastructure, and the efficiency of institutions. A country that can produce more output
per unit of input can generate higher incomes and a higher standard of living for its
citizens.
9. Prices rise when the government prints too much money: This principle is based on
the quantity theory of money, which suggests that there is a direct relationship between
the quantity of money in circulation and the general level of prices in the economy. When
the government increases the money supply excessively, without a corresponding
increase in the production of goods and services, it can lead to inflation. As more money
chases the same amount of goods, prices rise. Therefore, controlling the money supply is
important to maintain price stability and prevent excessive inflation.
10. Society faces a short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment: This
principle is known as the Phillips curve trade-off, which highlights the inverse
relationship between inflation and unemployment in the short run. It’s a short-run
tradeoff that applies to normal situations. Higher inflation becomes the opportunity cost
of lower unemployment. At other times the relationship may break down. According to
this theory, when the economy experiences high levels of unemployment, there tends to
be downward pressure on wages and prices. Conversely, when unemployment is low,
workers have more bargaining power, leading to upward pressure on wages and,
subsequently, inflation. Policymakers often face a trade-off between pursuing policies
that aim to reduce unemployment in the short run, which may lead to higher inflation,
and policies that prioritize price stability, which may result in higher unemployment. This
trade-off suggests that there is a limit to how much policymakers can simultaneously
target both low inflation and low unemployment in the short run.

You might also like