1987 LG Austin A General Model For Semi-Autogenous and Autogenous Milling
1987 LG Austin A General Model For Semi-Autogenous and Autogenous Milling
Introduction
Although the use of simulation models for it and then use an approximate simplified
the design of ball mills has advanced form of the models to compare the
significantly in recent years,(') progress performance of a typical SAG mill design
has been slow in applying the concepts of (LID = 0.5) with that of a representative
specific rates of breakage and primary FAG mill with LID = 2. It is assumed that
breakage distributions in the construction the reader is familiar with the concepts
of simulation models (2-4) for semi- and symbblism of construction of mill
autogenous (SAG) and fully-autogenous (FAG) models. (1)
mills. This is largely because the Mill models
physical processes of breakage occurring in
The basic mass balance
these mills are more complex than those in
. ball mills. Several recent papers by It is assumed that this type of mill
Austin and co-workers (5-9) have approximates to a fully mixed reactor where
investigated certain aspects of this the grate acts like a size classifier to
problem. prevent large material leaving the mill.
In this paper, we will first summarize The simple concept of residence time
the current state of development as we see distribution loses meaning in such a system
i>1
1+C' = 1/C wi(l-ci) [21
where p is the fraction of mill product in i
i
size class i; f. is fraction of feed in Applying Eq. [l] to this system using w =
I i
size class i; S. is the specific rate of
I. _
p!1 gives
breakage of size i material; b is the
i,i- i- 1
fraction of material broken from size class f i + ~C b S.w
i,j J j
j which appears in size class i; w is the w =
i )i * T i=1,2,..n [3]
1 1
fraction of hold-up of size class j; and n
is the total number of size intervals. The equation is readily converted to the
There is evidence that material less than close-circuit form.
the grate size undergoes classification as The hold-up in the mill of sizes 1es.s
r - - - - -1
I GRATE
I I CLASSIFICATION
I
I W
F fi F'.
' fi
e
I wi
I 1
1
I
1
I
I C' II
I
OVERALL M I L L
FIGURE 1. Illustration of grate classification treatment as an exit classifier
METALLURGY: MODELLING
than the grate opening depends on the ease abrasion in addition to normal breakage
with which slurry flows from the mills: processes, and abrasion follows a different
the level must increase in order to permit set of laws than breakage. Thus, Austin
slurry to flow out at a higher rate. Thus, and Menacho (I1) have formulated the overall
the system is only precisely defined if a balance on size i as 'Rate of size i
mass transport relation is used. We will material out= (rate of size i material in)
use the empirical function + (net rate of material wearing in to size
N
fs/fso = (FV/FVo) m [41 i by abrasion of rounded pebbles through
where f is the fractional filling of the the upper and lower limits of size interval
S
mill by slurry, with slurry defined by i) - (rate of loss of fragments by abrasion
sizes less than the grate opening. F is a
v
of pebbles in size interval i) + (rate or
volume flow rate and N is an empirical production of size i material from the
m
constant. In terms of the hold-up of products of abrasion of larger sizes) -
material of sizes less than grate opening (rate of production of size i material by
in a mill of effective volume V, fracture) + (rate of production of size i
material from the products of fracture
breakage of larger sizes)'.
Considering abrasion according to a
where C is the volume fraction of solid in linear wear law it is readily shown(7,121
S
the slurry;
's
is the true density of the
solid; and i is the interval number
that the net rate of increase of mass due
to pebbles of equivalent radius r wearing
g
corresponding to the grate size. The value in and out of a differential size element
2 2
of Fv; is a standard flow rate which gives dr is W K ( ~ P/dr )dr, where P is the
a standard filling of f
SO
F
vo
.is expected cumulative mass fraction size distribution
(lo) to be related to mill size by of hold-up W and K is the linear wear rate
(LIT). Similarly, the mass loss from the
intervals is (3~/r)(dP/dr)dr. Incorpor-
where @ is fraction of critical speed and ating these with the usual first-order
C
A is the fraction of mill cross-section mass-rate balance due to fracture gives
g
which is open grate area. The simultaneous
solution of Eq. [4], [5] and [6] gives
convenient to define a mean value ;.by the p 1.=(wi) (l+C1) (1-ci) . For closed circuit
1
the values of f. are readily replaced in
1
product of some factor u and the upper size
- terms of make-up feed g
i
using the si
of sieve size i, r,=uf and make the reason-
1 parameters for the external classifier.
i
able approximation f+l(~/r)(dP/dr)dr ' FAG mill model
-
~ . w . / r ~ .The derivative dP/dr is approxi- The FAG mill model is essentially
1 1
identical to that to the SAG mill model
mated by (d~/dr).~w /(X~-~-X~)
1 i-1
given as Eq. [8] except that it is applied
wi-l/xi-l( 1-R) , giving as an equivalent series of reactors(899)
with various degrees of recycle of the
material rejected back to the mill by the
. .
1 1
grate, as indicated in Figure 2. A grate
classification action is necessary to
retain the pebbles in the mill. Of course,
the calculation of the effective overall S
where R is the ratio of lower to upper i
values will not include a term for breakage
sieve size of the size interval (=&).
by balls. In addition, the mass transport
It is convenient to define the specific
constant k will correspond to that for a
rate of loss of material by abrasion to m
long L I D ball mill and not a short SAG
fragments as a fraction of the specific
mill.
rate of fracture; letting
i- 1
Y ~ = ( ~ K ~ / U X )~ISi,
R putting u/3(1-R)=K,
Calculation of S and B values
and setting p!=w. gives as before
1 1
Breakage by balls and pebbles
i- 1
1~ J
i+KYi-lTWi-lSi-l++ <=IC (a..y.+b. In order to allow for different ball and
1~.)S.w
J j
JPA
Wi= (l+C1)(1-c,)+ T~S,[~+Y,(~+K) 1 1 pebbles sizes in the mill, the values of
[81 specific rates of breakage of smaller sizes
to be used in place of Eq. [3] if abrasion by impact from media were calculated from
processes are significant. The size the equations developed for ball mills. (1)
distribution of the product stream from the The relations between the specific rates of
GRATE
CLASSIFICATION
r - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1
I
I MILL I MILL 2
- -MILL m
I
I
F
fl
I
I * WI, I
TI
. , c
Wi,2
r2
----- Wi,m
Trn
- I
I
I
I "IC' e&' e,C1
C'
I
L----------------,
----
, --1
,
OVERALL MlLL
METALLURGY: MODELLING
breakage determined using a single ball mixture of balls can be calculated from
size in a laboratory test mill of diameter
D and those for a mixture of balls in a
Bi,j-
-
:nkSj ,kBi,j ,kl: ?cSj ,k [I21
S I E V E SIZE, mm
FIGURE 4. Typical shape for the sum specific rate of breakage in SAG
a
S
S(SIi = s(~i/~o) [I51 gives
CL
S (S) ST(~i/~o)S ~ S l ~ S 2 [ 181
where S is smaller than the corresponding
for media, so that S(S)i is negligible N1
for small particle sizes.
where
C =
(DIDT) -
D<3.81 m
S1
The empirical equation used to allow for -
(3.81/~~)~1(~/3.81)~1-*D>3.81 m
the effect of media filling on JBP B+J PPP
C =( 1+(~~/0.4)
self-breakage is 52 1+(J /0.4)~)(
J~ P~
> exp [ -cs (Uk-UT> 1
1
S(Si a [ 161
1+(~/0.4) where c is the cushioning factor for self-
S
breakage.
Since breakage is proportional to SJ, this
gives a maximum rate of breakage at J=0.4. Experimental data
When a fraction of the media is steel balls Ball x mill breakage
it seems logical that the rock in the The material used for the simulations was
tumbling stream will receive a a composite sample of copper ore from the
proportionate fraction of heavier impacts. Los Bronces mine in Chile. The standard
Therefore, the breakage rates were method of determination of breakage
corrected by parameters in a small laboratory mill as
S (S) i=(JB~B+Jp~p)
/JppP [171 described by Austin, Klimpel and Luckie (1)
Thus, although the breakage rate of a given was used, giving the characteristic
size of tumbling rock is termed parameters shown in Table 1.
self-breakage it is accepted that the size
and density of the rest of the charge has Self-breakage parameters
an influence on this breakage. The relations governing the variation of
It is expected that the specific rates of self-breakage parameters with mill
self-breakage will scale with mill diameter conditions are not as well developed as
in essentially the same way as breakage by those for ball milling, so a series of
balls as in Eq. [lo]. Combining equations tests was performed using a readily
- - - -
derivation of Eq. [ B ] . Figure 7 shows a
These values were also used to predict typical result of the balance between
normal breakage by pebbles using the average mass loss by fracture by fragments
conversions of Eq. [ 1 3 ] and [ 1 4 ] . from chipping-abrasion and by cores wearing
into the next smaller size internal. It is
availaule and homogeneous material, a white concluded that the proportion between these
crystalline quartz from the mine of the mechanisms remains constant during the
Castastone Company, North Carolina, with a process. Table 2 shows the variation of
Bond work index of 19 kWh/ton metric. these ratios for a series of tests. The
These tests were with particular reference ratio of the mass lost as chipped fragments
to elucidating the action of fracture to that lost by cores for the 4J2 size
breakage, chipping and abrasion during intervals is expected to be about 33% since
autogenous grinding. The test mill used the distribution of mass is linear over the
was 0.6 m in diameter and 0.3 m long, 442 interval. (7)
fitted with 20 lifters. An adsorbable dye However, Figure 8 shows that the overall
was used to number the feed material, and specific rate of breakage of traced lumps
the weight of individual lumps followed as decreases with time even though the
a function of grinding time in batch conditions in the mill are kept
grinding tests. The weights were expressed approximately constant. The equivalent
as equivalent spherical radii to enable the decrease can also be seen in the pure
calculation of abrasion rates. abrasion rates in Figure 5 . The physical
Figure 5 shows typical results. To avoid process involved is quite clear. The raw
the variation of parameters caused by the feed lumps are irregular and some have a
cushioning action of fine material and the relatively high surface area per unit
decrease of mill charge, the tests were weight, thus they abrade and chip
performed dry, the fine material was relatively rapidly. Chipping-abrasion
removed after short grinding periods, and causes the lumps to become rounded into
the equivalent weight of unmarked fresh pebbles, which chip-abrade more .slowly.
lumps added to preserve the desired J The direct proportionality of Figure 7
value. This type of test enables the shows that the fracture component follows
linear decrease of weight due to abrasion suit, so that the system behaves like a
to be readily determined, and values were mixture of weaker material which disappears
averaged to obtain mean abrasion rates K more rapidly, leaving stronger rounded
METALLURGY: MODELLING
GRINDING T I M E , min
FIGURE 5. Change of equivalent spherical radius with time for 86 individually-traced lumps within the
sieve range 63 x 53 mm; mean R, = 31 mm, upper r, = 35 mm, lower r, = 27 mm (D =
0.6 m, fine material removed after grinding period)
CHIPPING -ABRASION FRACTURE
i-2
i-l
0 r e s u l t s i n t h e presence of a v a r y i n g
0 0.5 1.0 q u a n t i t y o f b a l l s t o i n c r e a s e t h e mean
TOTAL FRACTIONAL WEIGHT LOSS d e n s i t y of t h e load. As e x p e c t e d , t h e n e t
m i l l power i s d i r e c t l y p r o p o r t i o n a l t o t h e
FIGURE 7. Contribution of individual breakage mechanisms
to the total fractional weight loss. Fully mean d e n s i t y o f t h e l o a d , and t h e s p e c i f i c
autogenous test in a 0,6 m diameter mill. Quartz
breakage r a t e s a r e a l s o p r o p o r t i o n a l ,
lumps of 63 x 53 mm in diameter, U = 0, J =
0.30, 4, = 0.70 v a l i d a t i n g Eq. [ 7 ] .
METALLURGY: MODELLING
GRINDING .TIME, min
FIGURE 8. Rates of self-breakagefor 26.5 x 22.4 mm copper ore. Dry batch autogenous grinding D
= 0.6 m, 4, = 0.7, J = 0.2,powder minus 100 mesh
'
Figure 11 shows that the primary breakage from those of normal fracture, which is to
distributions are approximately normalized be expected since the component of fracture
with respect to the breaking size, but are is relatively small (see Table 2). The
very different for the fresh feed and the shape clearly corresponds to a mixture of
rounded pebbles. In addition, the shapes fracture plus the cores and fragments
of the distributions are quite different produced by chipping-abrasion. An estimate
- \ S, FAST=0.42
min-I -
0 EXPERIMENTAL
- SIMULATED
GRINDING T I M E , min
FIGURE 9. Determinationof combined rate of breakage-chippingfor 63 x 53 m m fresh feed (D= 0.6 m,
J = 0.2, 4, = 70% of critical speed,quartz, no accumulation of fines)
METALLURGY: MODELLING
-
- I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ) I I 1 1 1 1 1'1 I
-
-
-
-
-
-
AGED
-
-
-
-
-
-
FEED SIZE, mm -
45 x 38 -
A 5 3 x 45 -
&4 QUARTZ
o 6 3 x 53
- -
-
-
--
- -
I I II I I 111 I11111 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1
R E L A T I V E PARTICLE S I Z E , xi / x j
FIGURE 11. B values from fully-autogenous batch grinding tests in 0.6 m mills; J = 0.30, U = 0. 4,
= 0.7
where p i s normally t h e b a l l d e n s i t y b u t
b
i n t h i s c a s e was t h e o r e d e n s i t y of 2.77
tons/m
3
.LID was assumed t o b e 2.0,
@ =0.85, and t h e v a l u e of J was t a k e n a s
C
PERCENT MILL FILLING, J\
0.3. With t h e s e assumptions, t h e m i l l
FIGURE 13. Variation of predicted mill capacity with filling
and ball load for nominal 28 feet diameter by d i a m e t e r i s D = 5.6 m t o g i v e a m i l l s h a f t
14 feet long SAG mill power of 2000 kW.
by Tanaka and Tanaka. (15) The s i m u l a t i o n was performed w i t h t h e
The v a l u e s of s p e c i f i c g r i n d i n g energy i n
same breakage p a r a m e t e r s used f o r t h e SAG
kWh/ton a r e a l s o g i v e n i n Table 4 , and
m i l l i n g , t h e same g r a t e openings t o r e t a i n
F i g u r e 14 shows t h a t t h e minimum o c c u r s a t
l a r g e m a t e r i a l and t h e same e x t e r n a l
about 6% b a l l l o a d . F i g u r e 15 shows t h e
c l a s s i f i e r function. The f e e d t o t h e 5.6 m
s i z e d i s t r i b u t i o n s p r e d i c t e d by t h e model
i n t e r n a l d i a m e t e r FAG m i l l was t a k e n a s t h e
f o r o p e r a t i o n a t 8% b a l l l o a d and f o r
same a s t h a t t o t h e SAG m i l l .
fully-autogenous operation. Figure 16
No i n f o r m a t i o n was a v a i l a b l e f o r t h e
shows t h a t t h e e f f e c t of t h e b a l l s i s t o
expected mass t r a n s p o r t r e l a t i o n , but t h e
i n c r e a s e t h e s p e c i f i c r a t e s of breakage of
comparison of t h e v a l u e s f o r t h e SAG m i l l
t h e l a r g e r s i z e s , w h i l e F i g u r e 15 shows
w i t h t h o s e f o r overflow m i l l s s u g g e s t s t h a t
t h a t . t h e consequence i s t h a t t h e f r a c t i o n
t h e long L/D m i l l s f i l l up w i t h s l u r r y t o a
g r e a t e r e x t e n t t h a n t h e SAG m i l l ,
presumably due t o t h e r e s i s t a n c e t o mass
flow through t h e long l e n g t h of tumbling
charge. Thus, t h e v a l u e of f i n Eq. [4]
so
was i n c r e a s e d a r b i t r a r i l y by a f a c t o r of 3.
Table 5 g i v e s t h e r e s u l t s . The s p e c i f i c
g r i n d i n g energy i s s u b s t a n t i a l l y l e s s , b u t
t h i s r e s u l t i s s e n s i t i v e t o t h e mass
transport f a c t o r so i t i s not possible t o
a s s e r t t h i s w i t h a h i g h d e g r e e of
0 4 8 12 16 confidence. I n a d d i t i o n , i t may n o t be
PERCENT BALL LOAD v a l i d t o u s e t h e Bond power e q u a t i o n f o r a
FIGURE 14. Optimum of capacity and specific grinding
pebble m i l l , s i n c e i t p r e d i c t s a much lower
energy with ball load at total filling of 25% mill
volume (see Fig. 13) m i l l power t h a n e q u a t i o n 21.
METALLURGY: MODELLING
S l Z E I N T E R V A L i AND SlZE
FIGURE 15. Simulated size distributions for SAG mill (see Fig. 13) with 8% ball load and 0% ball load
Discussion of results
TABLE 5. R e s u l t s of s i m u l a t i o n s of 5.6 m
d i a m e t e r FAG m i l l (LID = 2.0) It i s c l e a r t h a t t h e o r e s t u d i e d was a
c o h e r e n t o r e which would be s u i t a b l e f a r
Nominal f r a c t i o n a l hold-up FAG g r i n d i n g s i n c e i t l e a d s t o a m i l l
X minus 35 mesh i n c i r c u i t charge w i t h s u f f i c i e n t l a r g e rounded
Z minus 400 mesh i n c i r c u i t
product p e b b l e s t o be e q u i v a l e n t t o a b a l l m i l l
Output Q, t p h ( w i t h lower d e n s i t y of media, of c o u r s e ) .
Circulation r a t i o C
M i l l hold-up, t Although t h e s p e c i f i c r a t e s of breakage of
M i l l power, kW t h e s e l a r g e lumps a r e r e l a t i v e l y low,
S p e c i f i c g r i n d i n g energy,
kwh/ t r e q u i r i n g l a r g e r m i l l volume a s compared t o
b a l l m i l l i n g , t h e chipping-abrasion p r o c e s s
SELF BREAKAGE 1
S I Z E INTERVAL i AND S I Z E
FIGURE 16. Simulated specific rates of breakage for conditions of Figure 15
produces a high proportion of fines which total fractional mill charge of 25 volume X
compensates for the low breakage rates to gives a substantial increase in capacity
give specific grinding energies and circuit (from 305 tph to 400 tph) over FAG milling
products comparable to more conventional in the large mill, with a significantly
crushing-grinding circuits. However, the finer circuit product (approximately 32%
use of 6 volume % of ball charge and a minus 400 mesh versus 33%) and somewhat
METALLURGY: MODELLING