10 Agriculture Part 1 Notes 1733895643737
10 Agriculture Part 1 Notes 1733895643737
Agriculture
Part 1
➢ Minimum Support Prices (MSP)
o Background
▪ During the sixties the government to address the food
crisis promoted technological changes. However, it felt
that only this would not bring the required dynamism
in the growth of the agriculture sector. Hence in
addition to this govt introduced (institutional reforms
to support growth)
• Land reforms
• Promotion of agri credit
• Agricultural education
• Banking sector reforms (PSL)
▪ As a next step, the government appointed the L K Jha
committee to recommend agricultural price policy.
Following the recommendations a series of measures
were taken
• Agricultural Prices Commission came into being
in January 1965 (has been renamed as CACP from
1985). CACP submits the recommendations to
the government in the form of Price Policy
Reports (The Food Corporation of India was also
established in 1965, with passage of FCI act 1964.
o Basic Points
▪ It is the price paid for foodgrains purchased from
farmers (either by centre or state) for the central pool
of foodgrains
• The central pool is used for providing food grains
under PDS (Public Distribution System) and other
welfare schemes and kept as buffer stocks
▪ MSP was introduced for the first time in 1965-66
season (July-June) for wheat and now it covers 23
crops
▪ Is announced weeks before the sowing season, so that
the farmers can take informed decisions regarding
cultivation
▪ The centre though announces MSP for 23 crops, it
doesn’t procure all of them
▪ The states pay bonus in addition to the MSP by the
centre
o Benefits
▪ Will provide guaranteed price for the farmers
irrespective of the market price
▪ Will protect the farmers from being market price
volatility
▪ Government needs foodgrains for distribution under
its programmes
o Concerns
▪ The expenditure of the government would be higher
contributing to revenue deficit and fiscal deficit
▪ The MSP policy will lead to skewed production and
supply
▪ The procurement under MSP is focused on few states
(surplus states)
▪ According to Shanta Kumar Committee Report, just 6%
of the farmers benefit from MSP
▪ With higher MSP, the market prices would be higher,
and this will contribute to inflationary trends
o Legalized MSP
▪ The government announced MSP under its executive
powers and there is no law mandating this. Hence
there has been a concern from certain sections of the
farmers’ unions which have been demanding a
legalized MSP
▪ Benefits
• The procurement will be spread across rather
than getting concentrated in few states
• There will be no fear of the government stopping
procurement as it will be legalized
• Other crops and other farmers will be covered
▪ Concerns
➢ Food Subsidy
o The government provides food grains to the beneficiaries
and in the process incurs expenditure. When the food grains
are issued the government earlier used to issue the grains at
₹ 3, ₹ 2 and ₹ 1 for rice, wheat and coarse grains
respectively. Now the government has decided to issue
them free of cost. Which essentially. Means the government
is bearing a huge subsidy burden
o In addition to this, the government also maintains buffer
stocks. For this also the government incurs the expenditure.
o Economic Cost
SHYAM SHANKAR KAGGOD
(EDUCATOR, DIRECTOR - ACADEMICS, UNACADEMY)
▪ It is the total cost to FCI.
▪ It consists of Acquisition Cost and Distribution Cost.
▪ Acquisition cost consists of Minimum Support Price
(MSP) plus procurement incidental cost.
• Procurement incidentals are expenses incurred
during procurement till the foodgrains reach the
first point of godown.
• It includes the state taxes, commission to arthiyas
(middlemen), bagging materials, mandi labour,
transportation from mandi to depot etc.
▪ Distribution cost
• Freight (transportation)
• Handling charges
• Storage charges
• Interest etc.
o Concerns
▪ It will add to the central government’s revenue
expenditure and add to its revenue and fiscal deficit
▪ The food subsidy bill is already high, and this would
add to it
▪ The scheme will provide food security but not nutrition
security
▪ It will be promoting populism at the cost of fiscal
prudence
o Nutritional Security
▪ According to The Food and Agriculture Organization
(FAO) report - Regional Overview of Food Security and
Nutrition 2023: Statistics and Trends
• More than 74% of the Indians were not able to
afford a healthy diet in 2021 (it was 76.2% in
2020)
• If the rising food costs are not matched by rising
incomes, then more and more people may find it
difficult to afford healthy diet
• 16.6% of country’s population is
undernourished
▪ As per the NFHS-5 for 2019-21 reveals that 36% of
children under the age 5 exhibit stunted growth
indicating chronic undernutrition
SHYAM SHANKAR KAGGOD
(EDUCATOR, DIRECTOR - ACADEMICS, UNACADEMY)
• 19% of these suffer from chronic undernutrition
▪ As per the recent NITI Aayog’s MPI, 31.5% of the
population is nutritionally deprived. Hence there is a
need to redraw the coverage of the PMGKAY so that
leakages can be trimmed and those deserving ca be
covered
o How to ensure nutritional security – Way Forward
▪ Support transition of farmers towards cultivation of
such crops
▪ Shift farming subsidies from kind to cash
▪ Provide pulses and millets under PDS
▪ Ensure cash subsidies provided are used for purchasing
nutritious food grains
▪ Increases the awareness regarding the importance of
balanced diet