CURRICULUM-DEVELOPMENT-NOTES
CURRICULUM-DEVELOPMENT-NOTES
Types of Education
i) Formal Education: Refers to education carried out in institutions, with specific goals
and a well stated curriculum, venues, well defined teachers and learners.
– It is the process of training and developing people in knowledge, skills, mind, and
character in a structured and certified program.
ii) Informal Education: It is the unstructured education where learning takes place
through imitation, observation and participation.
– It is the life-long process by which every person acquires and accumulates
knowledge, skills, attitudes and insights etc from daily experience and exposure to the
environment at, home, school, at work at pay.
– It is generally unorganized and often unsystematic.
Key features
– Learning is planned and guided. We have to specify in advance what we are seeking
to achieve and how we are to go about it.
Cole(2003) defines curriculum as a policy statement about education and the ways of
realizing the policy through a programme of action.
Oluoch (2006) explains curriculum as all that is planned to enable the student acquire
and develop desired knowledge, skills and attitudes.
Saylor and Alexander (1974) define curriculum as a set of learning activities and
experiences for children planned by the school to attain the aims of education.
On further analysis and consolidation of the above definitions of curriculum, it can be
said that curriculum acts as a guide to the process of education. It gives lanes and
boundaries to the process of education.
Types of Curricula
The perennialists
They believe subject matter should be taught for its own sake.
They also believe that permanence of curriculum content and experiences is more
important than change
Subject matter has a value which is inherent in the subject being taught
It’s also their belief that educational system should be stable and its purposes steady.
Perennialists Approaches to subject matter
i) Emphasis is laid on the classical subjects. These are subjects valuable in their own
right and any educated person was expected to have had exposure to them.
ii) Emphasis is laid on the desire to make children literate and moral to enable them
earn a living as well as find a useful place in society.
Principles of perennialists
i) Human nature remains the same
ii) Man’s highest attribute is rationality
iii) Students should be taught certain basic subjects
The Essentialists
To the essentialists subject matter should be taught for use. They maintain that there
are certain essentials that each student in school ought to know.
The essentialists devote their time to:
i) Re-examining curricula matters
ii) Distinguishing the essential and the non-essentials in school programmes
iii) Re-establishing the authority of the teacher in the classroom
To the To the essentialists and perennialists agree on certain fundamental principles
such as:
i) Learning involves hard work often couple with unwilling application.
ii) The teacher’s role is to mediate between the adult world and the world of the child.
iii) The heart of the educational process is the assimilation of prescribed subject matter.
iv) The school should retain traditional methods of mental discipline.
.
The Progressivists
They believed that subject matter is a medium for teaching life processes and skills.
They take the pragmatist view that change, is the essence of reality.
Educators must be ready to modify methods and policies in light of new knowledge and
changes in the environment
To progressivists, a good school is not a place of compulsory instruction but a
community of old and young engaged in learning by co-operative experience.
Progressivists’ principles
i) Education should be life itself not a preparation for living
ii) Learning should be directly related to the interests of the child
iii) Learning through problem solving should take precedence over the inculcating of
subject matter
iv) Teachers have to advise not direct pupils
v) The school should encourage co-operation as opposed to competition
Philosophical positions
The three prominent philosophical positions that are closely related to perenialism and
progressivism are Idealism, Realism and Pragmatism.
Idealism
It is largely a traditionalist view which is a carry over from Plato’s writings
Idealism uses deductive reasoning in its quest for answers to current day problems.
They believe in the independence of truth from the individual or the society.
There is over emphasis on the intellectual aspects.
Idealism stresses the role of education in the transmission of the cultural heritage as
handed through the ages from the past. Hence it is a preserving function.
It allows the concurrent study of liberal and vocational education, as a means to living
completely through understanding life.
Realism
The realist believes in the existence of a real world, divorced from the imaginations of
the perceiver.
To the realist, the real world is the physical world of the physical matter of man and has
a specific role to play in daily routine and actions.
Here, the problems of man in life are approached through the inductive method by
which data is gathered to form a basis for new principles and generalizations.
Realism accepts God as the motive cause of all existence.
Realism argues that education should induct learners into their culture and help them to
adjust to the natural order of things in order to live in harmony with the universe.
Teachers act as guides: making children aware of the true nature of real world.
Realists advocate a study of physical and social sciences which are instrumental to
explaining natural phenomena.
Mathematics is also encouraged.
Advocates of realism include John Amos Comenius, John Locke and John Herbart.
Pragmatism
It is a progressivist position that sees reality as being in a state of flux or constant
change.
Pragmatists employ the realist approach in gathering information and facts, and idealist
approach in generalizing about the facts gathered.
Pragmatism seeks meaning in the immediate situation
According to pragmatists education
– Should enable the learner to experience situations in practice
– Is a means for recreating, controlling and redirecting, experience.
– Should help learners to solve their problems and is to be considered an integral part
of life.
Systematic sequencing of learning experiences is emphasized by pragmatists.
Teachers should provide an atmosphere in which learners identify the problems and
seek solutions to them.
Teachers should also arrange an environment that provides experience for learners.
The curriculum should be organized on the basis of the learners’ interests and the
subject matter selected should help the learner to solve problems.
4. PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CURRICULUM
These are insights gained from psychology which have a bearing on the learning
process.
Psychologists believe that learning experiences have to be introduced to the learner
when such exposure is most effective and most beneficial to him.
The following issues should be taken into account when dealing with learning
experiences in the curriculum.
– Capability of the learner
– Maturational level of the learner
– Students’ rate of learning as well as how they learn
Psychology as a discipline helps the curriculum designer and the teacher to reach
decisions in relation to:
– Sequence – in the stages of development
– Organization – grouping of learning experiences for optimal effect.
– Methodology – dealing with the question of what methods and approaches are likely
to promote and guiding learning most effectively.
Psychology also contributes to:
– Formulation of appropriate educational goals
– Decisions regarding the scope of curriculum
Theoretical Branches of psychology
i) Behavioral Psychologists
They have contributed to decision making in curriculum through their findings and
theories regard.
ii) Connectionist Psychologists
The work of connectionists like E.L. Thorndike (1931) has established the phenomenon
of the relationship between environmental stimulus in a learning situation and the
response to such stimulus and that repeated connection of pairing of the environmental
stimulus and the response embeds skills so learnt in the learner’s mind.
iii) Gestalt and Organismic Psychologists
Also called Field Theory psychologists.
They stress the understanding of the relationship between the physical world and the
world of experience.
They believe learning takes place more efficiently when the learner is given the
opportunity to view a complete learning situation from which he/she proceeds to make
response choices as opposed to the piecemeal presentation of isolated elements in the
problem situation.
iv) Mental Health Practitioners
psycho analysts and other mental health practitioner have helped to explain many
issues regarding human behavior especially that which is related to stress condition
their findings ,educational authorities are now in a better position to deal with crisis
situations that come up now and then in a school setting and which have an effect on
the learners level of concentration at the tasks provided by the learning environment.
An understanding of certain basic psychological principles will enhance the
effectiveness of planning design and development of the curriculum in a number of
ways.
a. The physical, health and physiological status of the learner in the classroom has a
bearing on the rate at which he will learn.
b. The learner’s nervous condition also has an effect on his mental readiness
c. Curriculum should be planned in accordance to different age groups corresponding to
different age- grade levels.
d. Different age groups have unique problems which require that curriculum is planned
according to such.
e. Like adults, learners have their own interests and aspirations and this should
determine curriculum structure.
f. Effects of rewards and punishments on the process of learning should be considered.
TOPIC 6
CURRICULUM MODELS
What is a model? It is a three dimensional representation of a person or thing or of a
proposed structure, typically on a small scale than the original.
Curriculum models are based on a body of theory about teaching and learning.
They are targeted to needs and characteristics of a particular group of learners.
They outline approaches, methods and procedures for implementation.
Curriculum development theories and models provide concepts, issues, explanations,
proportions and frameworks that give curriculum development directions.
DEF: CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT THEORY
Can be said to be a formal set of ideas that are intended to explain the elements and
processes of curriculum development.
A curriculum development model is a simple description of a curriculum development
system using a diagram.
Curriculum development theories and models provide foundations for curriculum
development, implement and evaluation.
They provide foundations for curriculum implementation review and construction.
RALPH TYLER’S CURRICULUM THEORY AND MODEL
Ralph Tyler was an American scholar and educationist. In 1949, Tyler published his
book; Basic Principles of curriculum and instructions.
Tyler identified four basic questions that should be answered by curriculum developers.
i) What educational purposes should the school seek to attain.
– By purposes Tyler was referring to objectives.
– He indicated that curriculum planners should identify general objectives by gathering
data from three sources:
a) Subject matter
b) The learner
c) Society
– After identifying these general objectives curriculum planners were to refine them by
filtering them through two screens – the philosophy of the school and the psychology of
learning.
– What results is instructional objectives
ii) What educational experiences can be provided that are likely to attain these
purposes?
– Learning experiences had to take into account both the previous experiences and the
perception that the learner brings to a situation.
iii) How can these educational experiences be effectively organized?
– Tyler talked about the organization and sequencing of these experiences.
– He suggested that the ordering of the experiences had to be systematic so as to
produce a maximum cumulative effect.
– A curriculum developer should look at the activities that should be given to learners in
term I, II, and III and organize them for the realization of the set objectives.
iv) How can we determine whether these purposes are being attained?
– The last question emphasizes the role of curriculum evaluation as an important
element, in the curriculum development process.
– A curriculum developer has to consider the means, method and strategies that will be
used to determine whether the desired purposes/objectives are being achieved or have
been achieved.
TYLERS CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT MODEL
Discussion of Tyler’s curriculum theory and model.
1. He put more emphasis on the objectives to guide curriculum development.
– According to him the sources of curriculum objectives are:
a) A study of the learners needs in relation to the needs of the society.
b) A study of contemporary issues and society’s life.
c) Seeking suggestions of subject specialists through consultation.
2. Ralph Tyler’s model provided the basis for other curriculum development models.
However it is considered simplistic as it ignored the complex process involved in
curriculum development.
– It does not offer the relationship between various curriculum elements.
– It was found to deal shallowly with the issue of curriculum evaluation which is an
important aspect of curriculum development.
Hilda Taba’s Curriculum Theory and Model (1962)
Hilda Taba was born in 1902, she was a curriculum theorist, Educator and reformer.
Hilda Taba believed that those who teach curriculum should participate in developing it.
She believes that teachers should develop curriculum and that curriculum should not be
handed down from higher authorities. She advocated what has been termed as the
“grass-root approach.”
She advocated that teachers take an inductive approach to curriculum development
starting with specific s and building to a general design –as opposed to Ralph Tylers
more traditional deductive approach starting from general to specifics.
Hilda Taba noted seven major steps in the process of developing a curriculum.
i) Diagnosis of needs
ii) Formulation of objectives
iii) Selection of contents
iv) Organization of contents
v) Selection of learning experiences
vi) Organization of learning experiences
vii) Evaluation and means of evaluation
i) Diagnosis of needs
The teacher starts the process by identifying the needs of the students for whom the
curriculum is to be planned.
ii) Formulation of objectives.
Objectives formulation should encompass the following areas:
a) Concepts or ideas to be learned.
b) Attitudes, sensitivities, and feelings to be developed.
c) Ways of thinking to be reinforced, strengthened or initiated
d) Habits and skills to be mastered.
iii) Selection of Content
The objectives selected or created suggest the subject matter or content of the
curriculum unit subject.*
– Subject matter should be related to the grade level of the student.
iv) Organization of Content
– A teacher cannot just select content, but must organize it in some type of sequences
taking into consideration the maturity of the learners, their academic achievement, and
their interests.
v) Selection of learning experiences
Content must be presented to pupils or pupils must engage in an interaction with the
content. To select learning experiences, Taba suggests that the teacher should ask a
number of questions. For example;
a) Is the experience appropriate for learning the main ideas?
b) Does the experience promote “Active learning?”
c) Is the experience appropriate to the students’ maturity level?
Taba also felt that learning experiences should reflect a variety of experiences,
including, “reading, writing, observing, doing research, analyzing, discussing, tabulating,
painting, constructing and dramatizing.
vi) Organization of learning experiences.
Taba outlines a sequence for organizing learning experiences: –
– Introduction
– Development
– Generalization
– Application or summary
Introduction involves developing student interest and proving diagnostic evidence for
the teacher.
Development or study consists learning activities that are designed to develop various
aspects of the subject and to provide needed factual material. These activities include
“reading, research, analysis of data, committee work and study of various kinds.
Generalization refers to students attempts to put ideas together. E.g comparing and
contrasting and exploration of the reasons for similarities and differences.
Application or summary is the stage at which the student applies generalization to a
larger framework.
vii) Evaluation and Means of Evaluation
Involves determining whether objectives have been met, diagnosis of the curriculum
plan, and assessment of any changes in student behavior.
TOPIC 7
PATTERNS OF CURRICULUM ORGANIZATION
Curriculum organization of the curriculum content means the process of selecting
curriculum elements from the subject, the current social life and the students’
experience, then designing the selected elements appropriately so they can form the
curriculum structure and type.
Definition
Curriculum organization is the process to change the content into students learning
experiences intentionally, and make learning experiences sequential, integral,
successive after curriculum ideology has been determined, curriculum goal set,
curriculum goal been selected.
Patterns of curriculum are also referred to as curriculum design; which refers to the
arrangement of the elements of a curriculum into a substantive entity.
Those components or elements that are arranged in a curriculum designs are:
1.) Aims, goals and objectives
2.) Subject matter
3.) Learning experiences
4.) Evaluation approaches
Curriculum components can be organized in numerous ways. However, all curriculum
designs are modifications and/ or integrations of three basic design types:
1) Subject centered designs
2) Learner centered designs
3) Problem centered designs
1. Subject centered designs
This subject centered designs category comprises several examples, i.e.
– Subject design
– Discipline designs
– Broad fields designs
– Correlations designs
Subject centered designs are by far the most popular and widely used curriculum
designs. This is because knowledge and content are well accepted as integral parts of
the curriculum.
i) Subject design
It is the oldest school design and the best known to both teachers and lay people,
because this is what has been employed over years in educating them.
It is popular because it corresponds to textbook treatment and how teachers are trained
as subject specialists.
This design is based on a belief that what makes humans unique and distinctive is there
intellect; the searching for and the attainment of knowledge are the natural fulfillment to
that intellect.
In the subject matter design, the curriculum is organized according to how knowledge
has been developed in the various subject areas e.g. History, Geography, English, and
Mathematics.
ii) Broad fields designs
The broad fields design, another variation of the subject centered design, appeared as
an effort to correct the fragmentation and compartmentalization caused by the subject
design.
This design permits the melding of the two or more related subjects into a single broad
or fused field of study. It is what we term today as integrated studies e.g. Integration of
English literature.
One reason for its continued popularity is that it dissolves subject boundaries in ways
that makes the information more useful and meaningful to the pupils. It allows the
teacher to have more flexibility in choosing content.
By integrating separate subjects, it enables, learners to see relationships among the
various subjects of the curriculum.
iii) Correlation design
It is a design employed by those who do not wish to go as far as creating a broad fields
design, but who do realize that there are times when separate subjects require some
linkage in order to reduce fragmentation of curricular content.
Correlation is an attempt to eliminate the isolation and compartmentalization of subjects
without radically overhauling the subject curriculum. For example a Science teacher
may collaborate with the social studies teacher by having students write papers dealing
with the history of some particular scientific theory.
2. Learner centered designs
All curricularists are concerned with creating curricula that are valuable to students, or
where students are the center or focus of the program.
Weimer (2002) described five learner centered practice areas that need to change to
achieve learner – centered teaching;
– The function of the content
– The role of the instructor
– The responsibility for learning
– The process and purpose or assessment
– The balance of power.
The function of the content in learner-centered teaching include building a strong
knowledge foundation and to develop learning skills and learner self awareness.
The role of the instructor should focus on student learning. The roles are facilitative
rather than didactic.*
The responsibility of learning shifts from the instructor to the students. The instructor
creates learning environments that motivate students to accept responsibility for
learning.
The processes and purposes of assessment shift from only assigning grades to include
constructive feedback and to assist with improvement. Learner-centered uses
assessment as part of the learning process.
3. Problem centered designs
Problem centered design focuses on the problems of living – on the perceived realities
of institutional and group life – both for the individual and for society in general.
Problem centered curriculum designs are organized to reinforce cultural traditions and
also to address those community and societal needs that are currently unmet.
Though these designs place the individual in a social setting, they are unlike learner
centered designs in a major way. Problem centered designs are planned before the
arrival of students.
Topic 8
CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
K.I.E. CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT CYCLE
TOPIC 9
CURRICULUM INNOVATION AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
Definition of key terms
INNOVATION is understood to be a social activity which aims at changing in four
dimensions.
i. Social practices.
ii. The belief
iii. The understanding.
Underpinning these social practices, materials, instruments, layout a space etc. and
IV. The social and organizational structures in which the practices are embedded and
which themselves are associated with systems of resources, power and
sanctions/gratification.
An innovation can also be understood to be a new idea or method, introduction of new
ideas or methods.
An innovation is usually characterized through some materialized plan which describes
the intended practices, and aspired ways of changing them and argues the theories
which justify the rationale. It uses some materials other resources ( time/money ) and
specific social structures e.g. steering groups, peer observation, debriefing session,
regular appraisal- to make people act in another way.
Its real test lies in being put into practice. Thus innovation is a practice to change
practices (fulllan et al, 1991).
CURRICULUM INNOVATION Is a medium type of change which is planned and
organized by the curriculum agencies. It includes the addition or removal of key aspects
in the curriculum because of one reason or the other.
IMPLEMENTATION Is the process of putting into practice an idea, programme or set of
activities new to the people attempting or expected to change.
This is the stage at which the planned curriculum is introduced into all schools and
colleges which are ready. Sub-processes to be considered here include scheduling of
implementation; the in-servicing and orientation of teachers and other educational
personnel; provision of other support services; provision of the necessary facilities;
introduction of any necessary organizational changes within the schools system;
introduction of the process of informing the general public about the new curriculum and
its implementation.
STRATEGIES are means or ways to achieve an objective.
Like planned organizational change, curriculum innovation change is based on theories
derived from social science. Group dynamics is very crucial in curriculum change there
are two approaches and these are
1. restricted approach
2. democratic or open approach
1.Restricted Approach
This where decision making is limited to few people in power so that information leaves
from one source and goes direct to the consumer. The change strategies in this
approach are based on the centre-periphery model of disseminating an innovation.
Dissemination is centrally controlled and managed. The innovation is planned and
prepared in details prior to its dissemination which is one way traffic from the centre out
to the consumer on the periphery. For example, In Kenya, this would be the case if the
information were to leave the Kenya Institute of Education and go directly to schools.
The strength of this approach depends on the central resources and the number of
destinations in the periphery and their distance from the centre. Power-coercive
strategies involve
– The use of power to alter the conditions within which other people act by limiting
alternatives
– shaping consequences of acts and directly influencing actions
In its very nature educational end cannot be achieved without the commitment/
involvement of the stake holders. Hence, more open and democratic approaches are
advocated.
2.Democratic (open) Approach
The source of information is decentralized and the entire community is involved in
decision making. It draws from various models recently developed to cope with new
notions in education which rotate around the emphasis on the child as the centre of
education and the learning process.
They include:
– Democratization of education
– Active participation of the learner
– Group dynamics
– The whole idea of individual freedom
The main characteristics of this approach are:
i. Decentralization of the sources of the sources of information-achieved by proliferation
of centres through creating secondary centres to extend the reach and improve the
efficiency of the primary centres.
ii. shifting of centres- instead of having fixed centres in the capital city and district
headquarters,these can shift to other cities and other parts of the district. This allows for
more direct involvement and faster adoption.
iii. social interaction between the members of the adopting groups- this is vital since the
success of dissemination is determined by the social climate of the
receiving body.this helps to bring the stakeholders together.
iv. problem solving approach- the consumer should identify and understand the problem
and should eventually initiate the innovation so that the process is one in which he
recruits outside help. It recognizes that the school is the most crucial consideration in
the planning of curriculum change.
v. promoting change through research – it involves linking the innovative process with
research and development,and making intellectual appeal through the demonstration of
the greater effectiveness of some idea or practice over the existing ones.
The open approach helps to improve rather than eradicate the traditional approach.
The seven stages in any planned change include:
1) diagnosis of social needs and relationships.
2) Target setting
3) Survey feedback and experimentation
4) Team training and workshops
5) Emphasis on inter-personal relationship
6) Patience and increased data-flow between the participants.
7) Use of expert consultants.
TOPIC 10
Read further about the curriculum approaches
Learner centered
Experiential learning
Interdisciplinary approach, like broadfields, correlated, interdisciplinary, intradisciplinary,
multidisciplinary