4
4
net/publication/334372698
CITATIONS READS
10 5,151
4 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Samudaya Nanayakkara on 10 July 2019.
(E-mail: [email protected])
Abstract— Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system has two, increasing managerial flexibility, lowering the cost in the
become a key component of organizations all over the globe entire supply chain (cost and time are main parameters in the
long-term running project) [7], shortening the lead time and
giving an edge over competitors. However, the adaptation of throughput time, increasing efficiency of communication
ERP systems in construction companies is far behind than among functional boundaries [8], improving business
other industrial fields. As it is a highly heterogeneous sector productivity (reducing inventories, expanding the product
with a great diversity of specialties and large disparities in choice, providing more reliable delivery dates), improving
the size of companies, the complexity of interconnecting the quality customer service [9], competitive advantage are some
of the uses which can obtain from ERP system [7, 10].
projects is significant. Thus, the main objective of this
research is to investigate how ERP will impact to the Barriers to the ERP implemetation are identified as
construction industry and establish the aspects to measure the requirement of high cost and resources, incompatibility of
software with the company objective [3], problems with
ERP readiness before its implementation. The research was technical advancement and human resources, not having clear
conducted using 210 financial statements from 29 objective of using ERP before its implementation, lack of
construction companies. It is proved that 90% of the senior involvement, unbalanced combination of team project
companies who have implemented ERP has gained [1, 10]. However, when considering small construction firms,
significant successful rate with their construction activities. financial capital, human and technical resources are major
concerns [11, 12]. And also, culture, politics, government
Furthermore, it is certified that ERP readiness ratios named
regulations, management style and labor skills can be
Investment/Revenue more than 10% and Intangible considered as indirect determinant factors for the
Asset/Fixed Asset more than 10% are required to fulfill implementation [4, 12-14].
management and technical requirements respectively for a Previous researchers have identified how ERP system can
successful implementation. And also, it is identified that the affect to the process of construction companies and the
training cost allocated by the construction companies is challenges which are faced in the ERP implementation. No
much lower than it requires. previous research has focused on overall financial behavior of
companies with the ERP implementation and how to overcome
the challenges of implementing with a proper readiness [8, 14-
Keywords— ERP, Financial ratios, Readiness Scale, 17]. Through this research it is expected to find out the impact
Construction industry of ERP implementation on the growth rate of construction
companies with a critical analysis of financial statements.
I. INTRODUCTION Furthermore, this study suggests the threshold values for
readiness factors to be identified by the company owners
Many construction companies are embarked upon ERP with before the investment on ERP [11, 18, 19].
the growth of global competition [1]. As construction company
has uniqueness on its functionalities it needs specialized ERP
vendors as well as specialized systems which is driven by II. RESULTS
projects [2]. ERP can benefit the company in five main ways
called Operational, Managerial, Strategic, IT infrastructure, A. Impact of the ERP implementation
Organizational [3, 4]. ERP provides two main pros than that of
a company which does not have an integrated system. They are As shown in Fig. 1 impact of ERP implementation on the
(a) A one clear picture of all businesses that comprise with all construction companies’ growth can be categorized in to five
functions and departments [5, 6]. (b) A enterprise single ways with the results. They are (a) Companies who continue
database where all business transactions are entered, recorded growth rate with the ERP implementation, (b) Stagnated
,processed, monitored, and reported [5, 7]. Other than these
companies who increase the growth rate with the ERP
implementation, (c) Companies who survive with the ERP
ERP
implemeted
After 2010
15%
ERP
implemented
Companies
(2005-2010)
85%
Reach data
with ERP
sys
29%
Other
30%
Fig. 9: Results by large companies
When establishing the readiness factors Intangible Asset This study provides a valuable insight to the impacts of ERP
Investment/Revenue ratio, Training Cost/Revenue, implementation and company readiness to accept the ERP.
Intangible Asset/Fixed Asset Ratio were considered under Research output indicates that companies are unable to deal
three criterions management, technical, and human resources with huge amount of data unless there is an ERP system. Only
readiness respectively. All companies who have succeed 1% has a high growth rate without ERP. Because when the
with ERP have invested more than 10% on intangible assets company is growing, it needs efficient and accurate data
over their investments as per the Fig. 11. Thus, it is handling system. Without ERP it is a miracle for highly
recommended that company should exceed 10% of revenue growing companies to achieve that target. Thus, there is a high
over intangible asset investments (Management) for proper impact from ERP for the large companies than medium
implementation. And also, 75% of the companies which companies. If there is no ERP, when the company is reaching
succeeded with the system exceeded 10% of total assets over its maximum operation capacities, it collapses (See Fig. 7).
intangible assets (Technical) as per the Fig. 12. According to the research output, it is assured that 90% (53%
high growth, 10% Stagnated to growth & 27% Survival) of the
companies have gained financial benefits from ERP
implementation. Only 3% of the companies have gain
successes without ERP (See Fig. 1). Therefore, it can be
concluded that ERP has a positive impact towards the
financial conditions of the companies.
On the other hand, ERP is one of the largest investments that a
company can involve with. So if there is no readiness to
accept to ERP, implementing ERP may lead to a loss. It is
noted that the implementation of ERP systems require much
capital, technical and human resources. Results have shown
that 7% of medium-size construction companies failed in ERP
implementation due to lack of these resources. Therefore, it is
crucial to identify whether the companies are satisfied with the
requirements before the ERP implementation. This qualitative
analysis shows the potential to invest on this system. The
Fig. 11: Intangible Asset/Investment Ratio for management readiness
importance of identifying readiness factors before the ERP
implementation for a construction company has analyzed
under three criterions named as Managerial readiness,
Technical Readiness, and Human resource readiness using
ratios Intangible asset investment/Revenue, Intangible
asset/Fixed asset and Training cost/Revenue respectively.
A. . Intangible asset/Investment
Apart from that, if the company intangible websites and ERP vendors’ websites. Also, journal articles,
investment/Revenue ratio is low it indirectly indicates that conference articles and ERP related web sites were referred
the top management doesn’t involve with those investments for the data collection.
very much. Further, if the Top management does not support
with installation with the financial support company is very A. Identification of the impact on the growth of
unlike to ready for the ERP system implementation. When construction companiest
the investment on intangible assets is comparatively low, it
To identify how the growth rate of construction companies are
can be concluded that the company is not technically feasible
varied because of ERP implementation, 210 financial reports
to accept the ERP implementation also.
form 29 construction companies were analyzed. The
measurements considered were revenue, expenditure,
Moreover, ERP strategies will not match with the goals of
operation cost, material cost, and inventory before and after
the organization if the ratio is well below than the
implementing ERP. The Fig. 13 describes how the final
requirement. ERP is not matching with the low-cost culture
sample was selected from the initial sample off 594 annual
of a company as it already costs higher itself than the other
reports from 99 construction companies which are listed in
additional requirements. Thus, both strategies should be
stock exchange. As shown in Fig. 15 it was consisted with
aligned with each other to mean a good readiness for ERP.
Building construction companies (27Nos) City Development
B. Training cost/Revenue (03Nos), Civil construction (20Nos), Communication
(01Nos), Electrical (01Nos), Energy (09Nos), Infrastructure
The training cost of employees is hidden in all most all of the (15Nos), Manufacturing (06Nos), Mechanical (9Nos) and
financial statements which were selected for the analysis. It Real state (8Nos) (Total of 99 companies). The data was
indicates that most of the companies are reluctant to allocate
collected from large and medium construction companies from
budget on training. That is because top management doesn’t
like to involve with ERP. But according to the previous developed countries as well as developing countries. (See Fig.
literature, staff training is a critical component of ERP 14)
implementation [9, 10, 19, 20, 21]. Because of this, even
though companies are implemented ERP they struggle for
obtaining expected results from the system
C. Intangible fixed assets
[6] Nicolaou, A. and Bhattacharya, S. (2006). Organizational [17] P. Perera, S. Nanayakkara, and A. Perera, "Benefit of
performance effects of ERP systems usage: The impact of post- Implementing a National Level ERP system for Health Sectors
implementation changes. International Journal of Accounting in Sri Lanka through Stock Optimization," in The Second
Information Systems, 7(1), pp.18-35. International Congress of Interdisciplinary Research and
Development, 2012, Thailand.
[7] K. S. Nanayakkara, P. Perera, and F. Shantha, "Universal
Communication Interface through Web Services for [18] Nwankpa, J. (2015). ERP system usage and benefit: A model of
Heterogeneous Systems with Dynamic System Life Cycle," antecedents and outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 45,
International Journal on Computer Science and Technology, vol. pp.335-344.
5, no. SP1, pp. 48-55, 2014 2014.
[19] P. Perera, S. Nanayakkara, and A. Perera, "Critical Evaluation
[8] Umble, E., Haft, R. and Umble, M. (2003). Enterprise resource on ERP Applications for Defence Sector of Sri Lanka,"
planning: Implementation procedures and critical success International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and
factors. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(2), Management, vol. 21, no. SP1, pp. 4.1-4.16, 2013.
pp.241-257.
[20] K. Sarveswaran, P. Perera, S. Nanayakkara, A. Perera, and S.
[9] Yoon, C. (2009). The effects of organizational citizenship Fernando, "Challenges in developing MIS–Case from
behaviors on ERP system success. Computers in Human Government sector," 2006 2006.
Behavior, 25(2), pp.421-428.
[21] S. Nanayakkara, N. Kusumsiri, and P. Perera, "Adaptation of
[10] Seo, G. (2013). Challenges in Implementing Enterprise Diffusion of Innovations Theory for Successful ERP
Resource Planning (ERP) system in Large Organizations: Implementation," International Journal of Computer Science and
Similarities and Differences Between Corporate and University Technology, vol. 7, no. 1, 2016 2016.
Environment. MSc. MIT Sloan School of Management.