0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views

power_andersen

The paper discusses the challenges of verifying protection and control systems on DP3 vessels, focusing on fault ride-through and blackout scenarios. It emphasizes the importance of redundancy, fault identification, and fast fault clearance to ensure safety and operational integrity in high-risk environments. The authors propose a robust fault protection system design that includes hardware, information, and software redundancy to enhance reliability and mitigate the impact of electrical faults.

Uploaded by

xamauvt
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views

power_andersen

The paper discusses the challenges of verifying protection and control systems on DP3 vessels, focusing on fault ride-through and blackout scenarios. It emphasizes the importance of redundancy, fault identification, and fast fault clearance to ensure safety and operational integrity in high-risk environments. The authors propose a robust fault protection system design that includes hardware, information, and software redundancy to enhance reliability and mitigate the impact of electrical faults.

Uploaded by

xamauvt
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

Return to Session Directory

Author’s Name Name of the Paper Session

DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE


October 15-16, 2013

POWER SESSION

Challenges of Protection and Control System Verification on


DP3 vessels with Focus on Ride Through Fault and Blackout

By Rune B. Andersen & Inge Haukaas


Siemens
R. B. Andersen & I. Haukaas, Siemens Challenges of Protection and Control System...

Introduction
Worst case system disturbances manifest themselves in the form of short circuits between phases
and/or ground. Short circuits produce high fault currents. The fault may be symmetrical three
phase (to ground) faults. Other fault types produce non-symmetrical fault current. The magnitude
of fault currents is usually largest for three phase faults. The severity and potential damage that
can be caused by system disturbances influence the selection of protection systems.

There are also abnormal operating conditions that can lead to fault if not interrupted. These
conditions are not associated with a fault current and involve:
- Over/under voltage
- Over/under frequency
- Thermal overload
- Unbalanced or asymmetric load

Purpose
The purpose of a protection system is to protect the electrical power system from equipment
damages as well as to ensure safety and operational security. The protection cannot prevent
system faults, but it can limit the damage. It shall protect people and plant from damage by
clearing faults as fast as possible in a selective way.

Requirements
High demanding protection requirements are forced upon a system that is designed for class DP3
operations, which is applicable for all high risk operating modes such as drilling, where loss of
position keeping capability may cause fatal accidents, severe pollution or damage with major
economic consequences. The headlines in this context are technical redundancy, fault
identification and isolation, fault ride through, high-speed fault clearance and selectivity.
Furthermore, equally important as protection are prevention and mitigation of undesirable events,
such as failsafe operability of the power plant and blackout recovery for generators.

Loss of position keeping ability is not to occur in the event of a single failure:
- In any component or system.
- Due to a single inadvertent act of operation.
- Due to failures or faults that can be hidden until a new fault occurs.

The stakes are even higher with more demanding challenges due to special requirements based on
the power system operational ring configuration. A DP3 closed bus system takes system fault
integrity to a higher level in comparison to the traditional power system solution with segregated
power sub systems, i.e. open bus ties. It is thus desirable to improve such power systems of
dynamically positioned vessel, and to reduce or even eliminate fault propagation in such power
systems. It is desirable that most parts of the power system remain operable upon occurrence of
faults.

This paper mainly considers the system protection against a single failure due to an electrical
fault in the medium voltage generation and distribution system supplying the thrusters with
power.

MTS Dynamic Positioning Conference October 15-16, 2013 Page 2


R. B. Andersen & I. Haukaas, Siemens Challenges of Protection and Control System...

A fault protection system of a power system of dynamically positioned vessel must be provided.
The power system has a power distribution bus having three or more bus subsections, electric
connections including bus ties which connect the bus subsections in a ring configuration, and
circuit breakers between the subsections. The fault protection system includes a generator circuit
breaker for coupling a generator to a bus subsection, feeder circuit breaker(s) for coupling load(s)
to the bus subsection, a first circuit breaker for connecting one end of the bus subsection to a bus
tie that provides electric connection to another bus subsection, the first circuit breaker being a bus
tie breaker, a second circuit breaker for coupling another end of the bus subsection to a further
bus subsection, protection relays for operating the circuit breakers, and IEC 61850
communication links between protection relays that exchange high-speed information via said
communication links.

The DP3 power system design including a fault protection system should be judged and rated by
a failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in addition to trials by careful planning and execution
of adequate test programs.

Redundancy
Redundancy in form of duplication of critical components, functions or systems increases the
overall system’s reliability with the intention to comply with the DP3 closed ring requirements.
The duplication can either be fully independent as a parallel running backup system or partially
independent as a fail-safe.

There are different forms of redundancy, such as hardware redundancy, information redundancy
and software redundancy.

The protection system in principal is defined as shown in red outline in Figure 1. The circuit
breaker mechanism is not defined as part of the protection system. The protection functional
scope ends with the trip coils (open/close).

Hardware
In order to achieve a fault-tolerant design, the highest grade of hardware redundancy would be
achieved by duplicating all of the sub components in the protection system. Two independent
protection systems safeguard the power unit with a complete redundancy chain. An independent
protection system is understood as a protection device with separate measurements, protection
functions, control voltage supply and breaker trip coil. The prevailing philosophy is that the
protection system is not stronger than the weakest link.

MTS Dynamic Positioning Conference October 15-16, 2013 Page 3


R. B. Andersen & I. Haukaas, Siemens Challenges of Protection and Control System...

Figure 1 Protection system boundaries

Information
Information redundancy is achieved by designing an information system with high level of error
detection and correction. If correction is not possible within the required time, safety is still
maintained by turning the critical system functions into fail-safe mode. Fast communication
directly between protection devices and bay control units is carried out according to IEC 61850-
GOOSE. GOOSE is an especially fast and prioritized communication service that functions
independently of communication between the server (bay unit) and client (centralized station
controller). GOOSE is used for switchgear interlocking across bays as well as for special
protection functions where the protection scheme is dependent on very fast signals between
protection devices.
The DP3 closed ring automatic fault protection system is dependent on valid information. The
communication link is achieved by a redundant fiber optical ring connection. GOOSE messages
are monitored to avoid use of non-valid information. Signal interruption can occur during signal
transmission. Transmission of messages from the sending end to the receiver is cyclic, even if no
change of signal state occurs. The quiescent state is transferred to the receiver on a cyclic basis.
The status of the IEC 61850-GOOSE annunciation obtained from the system communication
interface is checked at the receiving device. For this purpose the logic module GET_STATUS is
provided. The logic module decodes the status of a single point or double point indication,
whereby the structure of the single point indication routed to the input is decoded to the VALUE
of the signal and the status information ‘Not Valid’ (NV) when the annunciation is no longer
updated within the expected time. The NV signal is used in the protection and control software
for either blocking further actions such as protection functions or turning to safe-mode operations
by the protection device.

Furthermore, extensive use of double point indications is preferred where high criticality or
priority functions are dependent on the correct status information. Double point indications are
designed reduce the risk of false status indications, such as breaker position. From two bit
information, four combinations are possible where only two of the four states representing valid
states such as OFF/ON or open/close.

The power system should be designed as a redundant high level information system feeding the
operator in the control center with as much precise information as possible, enabling the operator
to take the appropriate actions as soon as possible if manual operation in such a scenario is

MTS Dynamic Positioning Conference October 15-16, 2013 Page 4


R. B. Andersen & I. Haukaas, Siemens Challenges of Protection and Control System...

required. Operator commands are carried out as a select before operate sequence, i.e. two stage
command process with a software consistency check (quality tag) incorporated in the IEC 61850
command module. In this way, the risk of inadvertent operations is reduced to an acceptable
level.

In an ever more modern power plant, large amounts of information are available for conditioned
based monitoring, thus enhancing system reliability by failure prevention. Correct maintenance
and service actions based on statistical values such as operating hours and trip counters could
prevent failures to a larger extent.

Software
If possible, use of two different software protection algorithms or methodology will also enhance
the system reliability by software redundancy. Modern numerical protection relays use complex
protection algorithms and logic which place high demands on the protection engineer, e.g. relay
secondary parameter settings such as pick up thresholds, time delays and directional
determination must all unite in response to the primary fault in order to a detect and isolate the
faulty power system.

A redundant protection system could be exemplified with a bus bar protection application
realized through an independent bus bar differential protection system (System 1) running in
parallel with an equally independent overcurrent protection system based on directional
comparison end-to-end via GOOSE communication (System 2). System 1 could for instance use
direct hardwired trip of all circuit breaker on associated faulty switchboard whilst System 2
makes use of GOOSE trip commands over the fiber ring.

Failsafe Operability
Failsafe operability of power plant and reduction of human error are mainly associated with
switchgear interlocking.

Interlocking
The purpose of the system interlocking scheme is to prevent inadvertent energizing of generators,
bus subsections and transformer feeders. Mechanical interlocks are provided as well as hardwired
process level signals in combination with the introduction of IEC 61850 (GOOSE information
exchange is accomplished by an integrated Ethernet switch) enables the system to achieve cross-
bay interlock checks. Operation of devices such as circuit breakers, disconnectors and earth
switches are subject to specific interlock conditions. Permissive for all switching operations in the
system is governed by the system interlocking scheme which is executed by software logic
configured in the combined protection and bay controlling device.

Trip Circuit Supervision


Redundant shunt trip circuits should be provided for each circuit breaker. Relays for supervision
of the trip circuits of a circuit breaker enhance the fail-safe operability as part of the interlocking
scheme. Trip circuit supervision relay monitors the trip circuit wiring from the positive supply to
the negative supply whilst the circuit breaker is open or closed. In case of any failure in the
circuit, an alarm is issued which are used as close permissive of the circuit breaker in the
interlocking scheme. The operator should act on such an alarm by securing the plant operation,
opening the circuit breaker and correct the fault.

MTS Dynamic Positioning Conference October 15-16, 2013 Page 5


R. B. Andersen & I. Haukaas, Siemens Challenges of Protection and Control System...

Monitoring Functions
At process level, the medium voltage switchboard should be equipped with extensive monitoring
capabilities – both for hardware, software and process monitoring. In addition, the measured
values should also be constantly monitored for plausibility; therefore the current transformers and
voltage transformer circuits are largely integrated in the monitoring. If any failures of these are
detected, the criticality should be judged whether to alarm only, incorporate the alarm in the
interlocking scheme, and block protection functions that depend on this information or finally trip
the circuit breaker. A fault-tolerant design should aim to keep the component or system online as
far as possible within reasonable limits.

Lockout
Particular protection function trips qualify for Lockout, i.e. following a protection trip the circuit
breaker is interlocked against normal circuit breaker close operation. To yet again close a locked
out breaker, it needs to be reset.

Sync check
When closing a generator or bus tie breaker, the synchronisation in the main switchboard must be
given special attention to avoid un-synchronous power systems (U1 and U2) to be connected and
thereby a possibility for total black-out. Due to the criticality of such a fault, at least three
conditions must be achieved for safe closing; The bay controller ensures healthy measurements
and interlocking, as well as two independent sync check relays in series in the circuit breaker
close coil circuit.
The synchronization variables a) maximum voltage difference, b) maximum frequency difference
and c) maximum angle difference are checked. When the variables on both sides are inside of
permissible sync limits, the breaker shall automatically close.

Transformer Pre-magnetization
Connection of load(s) via transformer(s) must be given special attention. When transformers have
been taken out for service and maintenance and shall be re-connected to the medium voltage bus,
a pre-magnetization system should apply. The main objective for using pre-magnetization
transformers is to reduce the inrush current and following voltage drop when a breaker feeding a
large medium voltage transformer is being closed. Another important aspect is to verify that the
transformer is healthy before closing the breaker.
Further important aspects are pre-magnetization conditions prior to closing the circuit breaker
which is essential elements in the control sequence. A maximum voltage deviation over the
circuit breaker both in voltage magnitude and phase angle should be used in the close permissive.
After the circuit breaker is closed, the pre-magnetization source will be disconnected.

Connection of Dead Bus


Connection of a dead bus subsection to a live adjacent subsection (applicable if automatic
blackout recovery failed) must be given special attention to avoid high inrush currents in cases
where transformer feeders may still be connected to the dead system. If no measures are taken,
high inrush current would flow through the bus tie towards the energized transformer(s) causing
system voltage drop and relays to trip. Before closing a tie connection it is required to check bus
voltage on side to be connected. If dead bus is acknowledged, trip of all associated breakers are
required and tie breaker can close on affirmatively isolated bus. The energized subsection is ready
for operation and transformer could be connected one by one, preferable pre-magnetized.

MTS Dynamic Positioning Conference October 15-16, 2013 Page 6


R. B. Andersen & I. Haukaas, Siemens Challenges of Protection and Control System...

Fault Ride Through


Fault ride through for the relay protection plan is an important aspect to investigate in order to
maintain the protection integrity of the system.

Short Circuit Fault


The severity of a short circuit fault is mainly dependent on fault location, i.e. the amount of
impedance between the source and the fault location. In case of a short circuit fault on the
medium voltage power bus (in proximity of generator), the bus voltage goes rapidly to zero and
the short circuit current increases proportionally with numbers of generators online. After the
fault is cleared the voltage recovers towards nominal voltage within 1...2 seconds, however the
full transient may last several seconds depending on the performance of the automatic voltage
regulator (AVR) as well as the generator parameters. The objective is to keep the voltage
overshoot below 120% of nominal, regulate the transient back into normal operating voltage, and
ensuring system stability.

In case of a short circuit fault at the transformer secondary, the bus voltage measured on the
primary side is relatively low, could be less than 50% of nominal voltage. The short circuit
current is dependent on the transformer rating and short circuit impedance. Measured at
transformer secondary the voltage drops close to zero.

Generator overcurrent protection relay will detect the fault according to its short circuit
decrement curve, whilst feeder relays of Thrusters, Drilling and Distribution transformers will
depend on number of generators online. Bus tie relays will depend on number of generators
online and the location of the fault, i.e. more complex fault detection is required.

All generators will absorb extra energy during the fault. Therefore, all generators will oscillate
after the fault has cleared. As opposed to onshore power grids with an infinite bus system, gen-
sets in offshore power grids share the energy between them before and after the fault. This
reduces the out-of-step effect and provides damping of oscillations of the machines, thus
regaining of the system stability. Fast fault clearing performance in terms of high-speed fault
detection and isolation determines the system capability to regain stability after a fault on the
medium voltage power bus. The time duration of a fault permits the generator rotor to accelerate.
The shorter fault clearing time stops the acceleration sooner, reducing the risk of an out-of-step
effect by having adequate synchronizing torque recovering to steady state.

Synchronization of Generators (or Systems)


Compared to the fault ride through, the synchronization of generators are more critical due to the
fact that the gen-sets (or systems) are running on full voltage, unlike the a short circuit fault
scenario when voltage drops to zero (approximately). This significantly reduces the fault
consequences. The shaft torque may become dangerously high during synchronization, therefore
sync check must be ensured to avoid connection of generators under non-synchronous conditions.

Sudden Disconnection of Loads


The voltage will abruptly increase if several loads are suddenly disconnected from the power grid
due to e.g. false trip. The aim is to maintain the system voltage within 120% of nominal voltage
during such a transient state. The relay plan must reflect this scenario in order to avoid spurious
tripping due to over-voltage. Furthermore, the reverse power is relatively high on low loaded gen-
sets, however only for a limited time, i.e. less than a second. The reverse power relay is usually
set with a higher time delay than this, stabilizing the system against false tripping.

MTS Dynamic Positioning Conference October 15-16, 2013 Page 7


R. B. Andersen & I. Haukaas, Siemens Challenges of Protection and Control System...

Fault Identification and Isolation


Fault identification and isolation by protection functions are discussed with focus on fault
propagation in DP3 closed ring operation, i.e. closed bus ties.

When bus-ties are connected into one power ring, a fault in one section of the power system could
propagate and lead to tripping of generators and thrusters in other sections of the power system,
thus reducing the vessel’s maneuverability and must be avoided. Running generators in parallel
on a common bus have numerous advantages; however from a protection point of view it could
also create higher risk for total black-out of the vessel’s power system and resulting loss of
position.

Healthy generators may act faulty due to the compensating response to a faulty generator’s
unhealthy behavior.

System Earthing
Each power cell (bus subsection) should have a high-resistance earthed neutral system. This is
achieved by the main generators having a neutral earthing resistor (NER) rated for continuous e.g.
10A, connected to generator neutral. The NER is designed to limit the current flow to earth under
fault conditions. The limited fault current is low enough to prevent damage to the generator, the
distribution and other associated equipment, however high enough to for the protection relays to
detect a faulty condition and take appropriate actions. Core-balanced current transformer with
high accuracy (low current and angle error) for each circuit breaker should be provided. E.g., for
a power system containing 6 generators the maximum ground fault current will be 60A. For such
a system the core balance CTs must be according to IEC Class 1, 1FS10, 60/1A, in order to meet
a trip level of 1...2A primary. The protection devices should have fault directional detection
capability to selectively isolate the fault.

Selectivity
The protection system which interrupts and disconnects faults shall be implemented in such a way
that the faultless part of the power system continues to operate as close to normal as possible.
Protection functions shall never interfere with the normal load capacity of the unit protected, nor
shall transient, dynamic or abnormal steady state phenomena owing to coupling operations be
interrupted as long as these states does not lead to loss of station keeping capability. A normal
fault clearing shall be done in a selective way so that the faulty part becomes isolated from the
rest of the power system. The selectivity requirement can be departed in case of protection device
or breaker failure. All short circuit and winding faults shall be disconnected by two independent
protection systems if not other considerations are prioritized higher, such as risk of blackout.

The number of connected generator in each power cell (bus subsection) and distribution of these
in the overall ring power system impacts on the protection trip philosophy with special attention
to the bus ties, e.g. a bus bar short circuit fault cannot be tripped by a standalone protection
device according to a traditional power system time-current selectivity on the bus tie since this
action may isolate a healthy power cell where generator happens to be offline. Traditional time-
current selectivity in case of short circuit and earth faults is not sufficient with respect to fault ride
through in case of a fault near the generators. Strict selectivity requirements and low fault
clearing times suggest that zone protection schemes should apply in order to isolate the faulty
section of power system. Time-current selectivity on generator and bus-ties should only act as
backup to the zone protection scheme.

MTS Dynamic Positioning Conference October 15-16, 2013 Page 8


R. B. Andersen & I. Haukaas, Siemens Challenges of Protection and Control System...

Power Generation
The scope and choice of protection functions are influenced by the plant type, generator design
and power system connection. The generator is usually directly and galvanically connected to the
busbar, also known as a busbar connection. Several generators feed onto a common busbar. Table
1 comprises the protection functions suitable for an offshore power plant scale with medium sized
generators +/- 5 MW.

Table 1 Fault identification and isolation


Fault type Cause Protection functions Remarks
Overload S load > S produced . Bearing an winding Evaluation of temperature
Controller error. temperature sensor measurements.
Maloperation. monitoring (Pt100)
Short-circuit (2 Deterioration of Overcurrent time Time delay must be
or 3 phase) insulation. protection (I>). coordinated with system
Winding displacement. Differential protection.
Overvoltages. protection (∆I).
Manufacturing defects.
Earth fault Same as above. Earth-fault direction The protected zone is
(stator) in busbar connection approximately 90% of
(U0 and I0). stator windings.
Reverse power Drive failure. Reverse power Necessary for diesel drive
Shutdown. protection (-P). system.
Speed Leaking stream valves. Frequency protection Multiple time-delayed
irregularities Sudden changes in (f> and f<). stages recommended.
active power.
Controller error.
Overvoltage Controller error. Overvoltage Evaluation of phase-to-
Manual maloperation. protection (U>). phase voltage.
Impermissible Fault in exciter circuit. Underexcitation Only active if voltage is
under-excitation Operation in protection (-Q). above a certain level. Field
underexcited state current 4-20 mA
(high reactive power monitoring also
demand in system). incorporated.
Maloperation.
Controller error.
Asymmetric Unequal loading of Negative sequence Time delay must be
load conductor. protection (I2>). coordinated with system
Loss of phase. protection.

Highly advanced DP3 power system operating with closed bus-tie breakers requires additional
protection functions to cover specific speed governor, engine, AVR and generator fault behavior.
Monitoring of the generator performance based on available measurements and process
information enables a generator performance controller to take appropriate actions to isolate the
faulty generator and keep the healthy gen-sets online, thus regaining the system stability into
steady state after the fault.

Power Distribution
A busbar is a point of convergence of many current branches, thus a concentration point of
power. During a fault this will result in high destructive fault currents. A busbar fault endangers
the stability of the plant as well as cause damage to the switchgear. Therefore a fast and selective

MTS Dynamic Positioning Conference October 15-16, 2013 Page 9


R. B. Andersen & I. Haukaas, Siemens Challenges of Protection and Control System...

fault clearance is required (generally below 200 milliseconds including circuit breaker operation).
The busbar system should be protected against short-circuit by use of differential protection
devices as main protection. Redundant protection system could be employed by directional
comparison overcurrent protection devices co-operating via automation and GOOSE
communication as modern numerical protection devices also have fast PLC capability. High
resistive earth-faults are detected and interrupted by directional comparison sensitive earth
overcurrent protection system following the same concept. The power bus subsection is thus zone
protected strictly selective, fully redundant with very fast fault clearing time in case of a short
circuit or earth fault. Special design requirements prevails for the bus bar protection, the risk of
overfunctioning must be eliminated so that it remains stable during through-flowing current in
normal operation, likewise in the event of current transformer saturation.

The bus tie connects the bus subsections together via a power cable. Differential protection
devices in each end are used in order to achieve a zone protection scheme as for busbars. The
protection devices exchange protection data via fiber optical link. The link should also be used for
remote tripping of the circuit breaker in remote end of the tie to ensure safety in case of a local
breaker failure. Time coordinated and delayed towards up-and downstream breakers,
multifunctional overcurrent relays are used for backup in case of failure of the primary protection
system.

The transformer feeders are safeguarded by multifunctional overcurrent relays that detect and trip
the fault as soon as possible. Thruster and Drilling transformer could trip instantaneous; however
the Distribution transformer must be time-coordinated with low voltage distribution system. Two
stages, one lower overcurrent stage and one higher stage, should prevail such that a fault on the
transformer primary is disconnected instantaneous, and fault on transformer secondary is time
delayed according to selectivity. Inrush detection should be used to block overcurrent trip in case
of high content of 2nd harmonics which are dominant when energizing a transformer.

Breaker failure protection should be employed on all circuit breaker in the system. A protection
trip initiates a breaker failure start function that monitors the current flowing through the current
transformer in conjunction with the auxiliary contacts of the circuit breaker. If there is no status
change after a set time delay, the breaker failure protection issues a trip command to all circuit
breakers feeding the fault, i.e. isolation of the fault.

Switch onto fault protection (SOTF) should be employed an all breakers where there is a risk of
inadvertent energizing of an earthed feeder. The SOTF function initiates when a manual close
command is given to the circuit breaker. By monitoring the current flowing through the current
transformer and the said current is above a certain pickup threshold, the function will trip without
time delay. The SOTF function must be stable with respect to inrush current, refer to inrush
restraint.

Loss of conductor in the distribution system could cause fatal accidents and should be detected by
negative sequence protection I2/I1 in conjunction with symmetrical current supervision. The
pickup levels and time delays must be time coordinated with other breakers in the system.

Under/over- voltage and under/over-frequency in the closed ring power distribution system
should be used with care. These system protection functions should always be coordinated with
PMS, and only trip in the last resort due to risk of blackout.

MTS Dynamic Positioning Conference October 15-16, 2013 Page 10


R. B. Andersen & I. Haukaas, Siemens Challenges of Protection and Control System...

Blackout Recovery
Loss of main power is a high criticality fault that is a threat to the vessel’s maneuverability. A
rapid and reliable recovery system should mitigate such a situation to the furthest possible extent.
The recovery system is a joint effort from the switchboard detecting the dead bus condition at the
same time initiating an automatic blackout recovery to the power management system which
takes the appropriate further actions in order to live up the dead bus.

The first steps are controlled by internal switchboard logical controllers. Bus voltage blackout
should be detected by a two-out-of-two criterion; analogue bus voltage measurements below e.g.
5% in conjunction with a dead bus signal from an external zero voltage blackout relay. The
associated generator circuit breaker(s) and bus tie breakers should be tripped to isolate the bus
subsection from the main power ring. (Trip command should be blocked if the dead bus is due to
an isolated bus subsection fault or if manually isolated for service and maintenance purposes.)
Transformer feeders should remain in the same position as prior to blackout. In order to enable
rapid voltage recovery, the generator should keep on running, however de-excited by the dead bus
trip. When the bus subsection are tripped due to black out, the system will be automatically reset
so that it can be restarted and reconnected again according to a defined procedure avoiding any
unexpected situations as to high load demand, high inrush currents or uncontrolled re-energizing
of feeders.

The next steps are controlled by the PMS which will initiate the blackout restart after a
plausibility check. The dead bus signal from the switchboard should be present, and the breaker
positions should be open accordingly. Further important checks are that neither the generator nor
the busbar are grounded, and no bay controller reporting that its own circuit breaker is in local
position, indicating local or service operation of the switchboard. If plausibility checks are
approved, the PMS starts the diesel engine (in case the engine was not running prior to blackout),
closes the generator circuit breaker and generator excitation process is started. The AVR on the
generator will ramp up the voltage to nominal value. The capability of the AVR to ramp up the
voltage on dead bus allows the power system to soft-start with very low transformer inrush and
thus avoiding spurious trips due to high inrush current and voltage drop. When reaching aprox
90% of the nominal value, the individual motors are started automatically based on the last
running condition or by re-start from PMS. The pre-charge of the Thruster drive DC bus is
initiated automatically by the drive itself when the supply voltage returns. When the Thruster
drive DC voltage has reached aprox 85% of nominal voltage the incoming breakers will close and
the drive is ready to start. The Drive is now ready for DP operation. The estimated time to
achieve a successful automatic restart is below 20 seconds, depending on the diesel engine start
up time.

MTS Dynamic Positioning Conference October 15-16, 2013 Page 11

You might also like