0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views

Cep Rcd Report_merged

The document is a report on the design of reinforced concrete structures, specifically focusing on the N BLOCK at NED University. It outlines the problem statement, objectives, methodology, and expected outcomes, along with a literature review on reinforced concrete applications and codes. The report includes detailed calculations and design specifications for columns, beams, slabs, and footings using ACI codes.

Uploaded by

Zaryab Ali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views

Cep Rcd Report_merged

The document is a report on the design of reinforced concrete structures, specifically focusing on the N BLOCK at NED University. It outlines the problem statement, objectives, methodology, and expected outcomes, along with a literature review on reinforced concrete applications and codes. The report includes detailed calculations and design specifications for columns, beams, slabs, and footings using ACI codes.

Uploaded by

Zaryab Ali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 57

CE-320 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN -I

COMPLEX ENGINEERING PROBLEM REPORT

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

NED UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY KARACHI,


PAKISTAN

RCD REPORT

Page 1 of 51
BATCH: 2022

By

NAME SEAT NO

1. MUHAMMAD AQIB HAMEED CE-22011


2. HAFIZ MUHAMMAD YASEEN CE-22014
3. MUHAMMAD ZARYAB ALI CE-22016

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

NED UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY KARACHI,


PAKISTAN

Page 2 of 51
TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF CODES
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS/SYMBOLS

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background
1.2 Problem Statement
1.3 Objectives
1.4 Scope
1.5 Expected Outcomes

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 General

2.2 Literature Collection

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY

3.1 Introduction

3.2 Design of Column

3.3 Design of Beams

3.4 Design of shear

3.5 Design of Footing

3.6 Design of Slab

REFERENCES

Page 3 of 51
LIST OF CODES

 ACI Code, Section 25.7.3.2


 ACI Code, Section 25.7.3.1
 ACI Code, Section 25.7.3.6
 ACI Code, Section 25.7.3.6
 ACI Code, Section 19.2.4.1
 ACI Code, Section 19.2.4.2
 ACI Code, Section 19.2.4.3
 ACI Code, Section 24.2.3.5
 ACI Code Section 24.2.2
 ACI Code, Section 9.6.3.4
 ACI Code, Section 22.5.5.1

LIST OF ABRREVIATIONS

In Inches
K Kips
Psi per square foot
Ksi kilo pound per square inch
Fy Specified yield strength of steel
reinforcement
Mu Moment strength due to factored loads
qu Ultimate bearing capacity of soil using factor load
Vc Shear strength of concrete
Vu Shear force due to factored loads

Page 4 of 51
CHAPTER NO. 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 PROBLEM STATEMENT

You are working as a junior structural engineer in a design firm, and you have been assigned to
complete the preliminary design of the N BLOCK located at the main campus of NED UET. The
contractor is asking you to provide the following set of drawings for the execution of construction
work.
1.2 REQUIRED

a) Architectural Drawing
a. Plan
b. Section
c. Elevation

b) Structural Detailing Drawing


a. Beam Framing Plan
b. Beam Detailing Drawing
c. Column Detailing Drawing
d. Slab Detailing Drawing
e. Footing Detailing Drawing

1.3 OBJECTIVE OF THE PROJECT

Following are the objectives of the project:


 You can refer to figure 1 as reference for the building to be designed for this assignment.
 Use AUTOCAD for the preparation of architectural and structural drawings.
 For structural analysis use any software like GRASP, ETAB, or SAP.
 Present all calculations in the final report.
 Use A3 pages for all drawings.

Page 5 of 51
1.4 SCOPE
The scope of this complex engineering problem is to design a column, slab, beam and footing

1.5 EXPECTED OUTCOMES


The expected outcomes are as follow

 Architectural drawing prepared according to the requirement.


 Advanced structural analysis detailing with complete details by using software.
 Detailed design calculations as per requirement.
 Structural detailing is prepared.

Page 6 of 51
CHAPTER NO. 2
LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 GENERAL
a) Reinforced Concrete:

Reinforced Concrete is the common term given to a concrete member (or slab) that contains
steel reinforcement (usually in the form of steel bars) to increase the strength of the structure.
The material that results from the combination of concrete and reinforcing bars is called
Reinforced Concrete (RC). During construction, the reinforcement steel is placed in the
formwork first, either in the form of a prefabricated steel cage or steel rebar that are fastened
together and wired in-situ. Then concrete is poured into the formwork and vibrated using
adequate devices so as to guarantee a high level of collaboration between the two materials.

b) Importance of Reinforced Concrete:

Reinforced concrete has very good strength in tension as well as compression. This makes
concrete a desired construction material. Concrete constituents are widely available worldwide
and inexpensive. Similarly, the production cost of concrete is very low. There is an overall
economy by using reinforced concrete because its maintenance cost is low due to the long-lasting
nature of reinforced concrete. Due to low permeability, concrete can resist chemicals dissolved in
water such as sulfates, chloride and carbon dioxide, which may cause corrosion in concrete,
without serious deterioration. Reinforced concrete buildings are more fire resistant than other
commonly used construction materials like steel and wood. Ductility enables concrete to show
sign of distress such as cracking and deflection if reinforced concrete member experience
overloading. This enables engineers to consider suitable measures to prevent further concrete
damages.
Properly designed reinforced concrete structures are extremely resistant to earthquakes.

c) Applications of Reinforced Concrete

a) Buildings
b) Roads
c) Foundations
d) Precast Works
e) Retaining Walls
f) Bunkers and Silos

Page 7 of 51
2.2 Literature Collection:

This chapter comprises of a discussion about the relevant literature collected for the reinforced
design of the column, beams, slabs and footing of the new building that has been constructed in the
civil department in order to design them we require few like the dimension of the building and
architectural drawing along with its structural drawing and remember the code of ACI (AMERICAN
CONCRETE INSTITUTE). It is the code which gives us the limit of shear and design and it is
followed all around the world.
a) COLUMN:
A column or pillar in architecture and structural engineering is a structural element that transmits,
through compression, the weight of the structure above to other structural elements below.
ACI specifications
 The Steel percentage range is from 1% to 8% of the gross area of the section (ACI Code,
Section 10.6.1.1)
 Minimum reinforcement is necessary to provide resistance to bending, which may exist, and to
reduce the effects of creep and shrinkage of the concrete under sustained compressive stresses.
 Practically, it is very difficult to fit more than 8% of steel reinforcement into a column and
maintain sufficient space for concrete to flow between bars.
 In cases where the area of the column provided larger than the area required it shall be permitted
to have a minimum area of steel of 0.5% of the gross cross sectional area.
 At least four bars are required for tied circular and rectangular members
 Six bars are needed for circular members enclosed by spirals (ACI Code, Section 10.7.3.1).
 For other shapes, one bar should be provided at each corner, and proper lateral reinforcement
must be provided.
 For tied triangular columns, at least three bars are required.
 Bars shall not be located at a distance greater than 6 in. clear on either side from a laterally
supported bar.

b) BEAMS
Beams are usually horizontal structural elements that carry loads perpendicular to their longitudinal
direction

c) SHEAR
Shear is opposing structural forces, which causes slippage, on a plane and failure.
ACI specifications
 Flexure-Shear Cracks the ACI Code specifies a capacity reduction factor, φ= 0.75 for shear.
 In general, the factored shear strength varies between 0 fc′ and 5 fc’ as per ACI Code
 A minimum area of shear reinforcement is specified by the Code. The ACI Code, Section
9.6.3.4,
 The presence of large moments on a beam, for which adequate reinforcement is provided, the
nominal shear force at which diagonal tension cracks develop is given by ACI Code, Section
22.5.5.1.

Page 8 of 51
d) FOR FOOTING
The footing is a structural member that safely transmits the load of the upper building to the
ground.

e) FOR SLABS
A concrete slab is a structural feature, usually of constant thickness, that can be used as a floor or
a roof. A slab-on-ground is supported on the subsoil and is usually reinforced with reinforcing
bars
f) SHEAR DIAGRAM
A shear force diagram is one which shows variation in shear force along the length of the beam.
g) BENDING DIAGRAM
Bending moment may be defined as "the sum of moments about that section of all external forces
acting to one side of that section
h) SOFTWARES USED

Page 9 of 51
Architectural Drawing:

 GROUND FLOOR PLAN:

FIGURE 1

 FIRST FLOOR PLAN:

Page 10 of 51
FIGURE 2

 ELEVATION:

FIGURE 3

 SECTION:

FIGURE 4

Page 11 of 51
CHAPTER NO. 3

METHODLOGY:

Design of Column:

- Method:
 Evaluate the factored axial load u P acting on the column. Decide on a reinforcement ratio ρ
that satisfies ACI Code limits.
 Usually a 1 % ratio is chosen for economic considerations. Determine the gross sectional
area Ag of the concrete section.
 Choose the dimensions of the cross section based on its shape. For rectangular sections, the
ratio of the longer to shorter side is recommended to not exceed 3.
 Readjust the reinforcement ratio by substituting the actual cross sectional area.
 This ratio has to fall within the specified code limits.
 Calculate the needed area of longitudinal reinforcement ratio based on the adjusted
reinforced ratio and the chosen concrete dimensions.
 From reinforcement tables, choose the number and diameters of needed reinforcing bars. For
rectangular sections, a minimum of four bars is needed, while a minimum of six bars is used
for circular columns.
 Design the lateral reinforcement according to the type of column, either ties or spirals,
 Check whether the spacing between longitudinal reinforcing bars satisfies ACI Code
requirements.
 Draw the designed section showing concrete dimensions and with required longitudinal
and lateral reinforcement.
 We have design three column by following this step and then have calculate largest
moment where the load is larger by using Etabs

- Formula:
 Pu = φPn = φk [0.85fc′ Ag−Ast + Astfy]
 Abar = πr2
 ρ=
 Ultimate Load=1.2D+1.6L
SPACING OF TIES
 16 times longitudinal bar diameter.
 48 times tie diameter.
 Least cross sectional dimension 6 inches

Page 12 of 51
Load Calculation (Catchment Area Method) (CORNER & EDGE COLUMN)

Catchment Area = 5.945' x 12.335'

Self-Weight of Slab:
= (150 lb/ft³) x (8/12))
= 100

Finishes Load:
= 144 lb/ft³ x (3/12)
= 36 lb/ft²

Masonry Load:
= (144 lb/ft³) x (12.67-2.67) x (0.5)x(12.335)
= 8881.2 lb

Self-Weight of Beam
=150lb/ft³ x (8/12) x (32/12) x12.335
=3289.33 lb

Self-Weight of Column
= 150lb/ft³ x (12) x (12) x (50.67)
=7600.5lb

Total Dead Load:


= 100 + 36
= 136 lb/ft²

Point Load:
= 136 lb/ft² x 5.945ft x 12.335ft
= 9973.09 lb
Final Dead Load (adding masonry load and self wt of beam and column)
= 9973.09 + 3289.33 + 8881.2 + 7600.5
= 29,744.12 lb or 29.74 kips

Live Load
Live Load (classroom) = 60 lb/ft²
To Point Load:
= 60 lb/ft² x 5.945' x 12.335'
= 4,399.89 lb or 4.399 kips

Page 13 of 51
Ultimate Load
Pu = 1.2 Wo + 1.6 Wc
= (1.2 x 29.74) + (1.6 x 4.399)
= 42.72 kip
Considering n = 4, G+3
Pu= 42.72 x 4
Pu = 170.88 kip

Procedure:
We have use the catchment method to determine the load
Given:
 rconcrete = 150 pcf
 rreinforced= 144 pcf
 Slab thickness = 8”
 Live Load for classrooms = 60 psf
 Ultimate load = 1.2Pd + 1.6PL
 Ultimate load = 170.88 Kip
Assume:
For tied columns:
Φ = 0.65
k=0.8
fy= 60ksi or 60000psi
f’c= 4ksi or 4000psi
Equation:
Pu = φk [ 0.85 fc (Ag – Ast) + Ast Fy]

Solution:
• Using area of steel to be 1% of cross sectional area
• Pu = φPn = φk [0.85fc′ Ag−Ast + As y]
• Pu = φPn = 0.65(0.8)[0.85(4)(0.99Ag)+0.01Ag(60)]
• Pu=2.06232Ag
• 170.93=2.06232Ag
• Ag=82.9 in2
• Assuming square column 12’’x12’’
• For number of bars, we used #4 bar for that we needed to divide area of steel (1% of Ag) by
Area of #4 bars.

Ast = 1 in2

Area of #4 bar = 0.196 in2
• For number of bars = Ast / Area of #4 bar = 5.092
• After rounding up, we used 6 #4 bars

Page 14 of 51
Design of Ties
• 16 times longitudinal bar diameter.
=16*4/8 = 8 inches
• 48 times tie diameter.
48 * 3/8 = 18 inches
• Least cross-sectional dimension 10 inches
• We pick least of all dimensions. So we will pick spacing of ties 8”

Load Calculation (Catchment Area Method) (Interior Column)


Catchment Area = 11.886’ x 16.835
Catchment area Length Slab 01 = 12.335 ft
Catchment area Length Slab 02 = 4.5 ft

Self-Weight of Slab:
= (150 lb/ft³) x (8/12))
= 100 lb/ft²

Finishes Load:
= 144 lb/ft³ x (3/12)
= 36 lb/ft²

Masonry Load:
= (144 lb/ft³) x (12.67-2.67) x (0.5) x (1.886)
= 8543.52 lb

Self-Weight of Beam
=150lb/ft³ x (8/12) x (32/12) x 16.835
= 4489.33 lb

Self-Weight of Column
= 150lb/ft³ x (12) x (12) x (50.67)
=7600.5lb

Total Dead Load:


= 100 + 36
= 136 lb/ft²

Point Load:

Page 15 of 51
= 136 lb/ft² x 11.886 ft x 16.835 ft
= 27213.71 lb
Final Dead Load (adding masonry load and self wt of beam and column)
= 27213.71 + 4489.33 + 8543.52 + 7600.5
= 47861 lb or 47.861 kips

Live Load
Live Load (classroom) = 60 lb/ft²
Live Load (corridor) = 100 lb/ft²
To Point Load:
= (60 lb/ft² x 11.866ft x 4.5 ft) + (100 lb/ft² x 12.335ft x 11.866ft)
= 17870 lb or 17.87 kips

Ultimate Load
Pu = 1.2 Wo + 1.6 Wc
= (1.2 x 47.861) + (1.6 x 17.87)
= 86.02 kip

Considering n = 4, G+3
Pu= 86.02 x 4
Pu = 344.10 kip

FOR INTERIOR COLUMN

Given:

 rconcrete = 150 pcf


 rreinforced= 144 pcf
 Slab thickness = 8”
 Live Load for classrooms = 60 psf
 Ultimate load = 1.2Pd + 1.6PL
 Ultimate load = 344.10 kip

Assume:
For tied columns:
Φ = 0.65
k=0.8
Fy= 60ksi or 60000psi
F’c= 4ksi or 4000ksi
Equation:
Pu = φk [ 0.85 fc (Ag – Ast) + Ast Fy]

Solution:
 Using area of steel to be 1% of cross sectional area
 Pu = φPn = φk [0.85fc′ Ag−Ast + As y]
 Pu = φPn = 0.65(0.8)[0.85f’c(4)(0.99Ag)+0.01Ag(60)]
 Pu=2.06232Ag

Page 16 of 51
 344.10=2.06232Ag
 Ag=166.85 in2
 Assuming column 14”X14”
 For number of bars, we used #4 bar for that we needed to divide area of steel (1% of Ag) by
Area of #4 bar.

Ast = 1.96 in2

Area of #4 bar = 0.196 in2
 For number of bars = Ast / Area of #4 bar = 9.98
 After rounding up, we used 10#4 bars

Design of Ties
• 16 times longitudinal bar diameter.
 =16*4/8 = 8 inches
• 48 times tie diameter.
 48 * 3/8 = 18 inches
• Least cross-sectional dimension.
 14 inches
 We pick least of all dimensions. So we will pick spacing of ties 8”

Page 17 of 51
COLUMN LAYOUT PLAN WITH DESIGNED COLUMNS

BEAM LAYOUT WITH DESIGNED BEAMS

Page 18 of 51
Design of Beam:
- Method:
 To design a singly reinforced beam Mu≤ФbMn
 Mu= 0.9 Asfy(d-a/2)
 Where a is the depth of the stress block
 C=T
 0.85fc’ab= Asfy
 a= .
 Then Mu =0.9Asfy(d-Asfy/1.7fc’b)
 To ensure tension controlled section ρ≤ ρmax
 As we know that ρ=Ast/bd
 So, Ast= ρbd
 So the equation of Mu become Mu= 0.9 (ρbd) fy[d- ..
]

 So, Mu=0.9 ρfy[d- ..


] bd2

 This is refered as 0.9 ρfy[d-


..
] , Ru
 Then Mu=Rubd2

Procedure:
-
Beam Section :
Compression Factor is taken to be:
fy = 60 ksi or 60000 psi
f’c = 4 ksi or 4000 psi

Loads on Beam
Self-Weight of Slab = 8/12 * 150 = 100 psf
Finishes = 3/12 * 144 = 36 psf
Masonry = 6/12 * 144 * 10 =720 psf = 0.72 k/ft
Self-weight of beam =8*32/144 * 150 =266.667 psf = 0.2667 k/ft
Dead Load = 136 * 11.89/ 1000 + 0.72 + 0.2667 = 2.60404 k/ft

From Table of loads :


Class Room’s Live Load lies between (50 to 70) psf
Live load = 60 * 11.89 /1000 = 0.7134k/ft
For Ultimate loads we take all loads in ksf , Formula used is ;
Q (Ultimate Load) = 1.2 (Dead Load) + 1.6 (Live Load)

Page 19 of 51
Qu = 1.2 * (2.60404) + 1.6 * (0.7134)
Qu = 4.2296 k/ft

Bending Moment & Shear Force

In order to design a beam (Of maximum strength) we consider a slab from plan consisting classroom,

TRIBUTARY AREA FOR ONE WAY SLAB


Tributary Width = 5.945 * 2 = 11.89 ft

24’

Washroom beam
Weight Distribution
Ultimate Weight = Ultimate Load * Tributary Width
Wu = Qu * TW
Wu = 4.2296 * (5.945 + 5.945)
 Wu = 5.0726 K/ft
Mu = (Wu * L²)/8
Mu = (4.2296 * (24) ²) / 8
Mu = 304.5312 k.ft

Design for Flexural


Mu = Ru*bd²
Ru = φ*ρ*fy (1 – ρ*fy/1.7*f’c)
Assume:
ρ = 0.011 %
Ru = (0.9)*(0.011)*(60)*(1-(0.011)*(60)/(1.7)*(4))
 Ru = 0.536 ksi
For Dimensions
Mu = Ru.b.d²
Mu / Ru = b.d²
b.d² = 304.5312*12/ 0.536
b.d² = 6813.451 in³

For depth of beam


b = 6”
bd² = 6813.451
d² =6813.451 / 6
d = 33.698”
b = 8”
bd² = 6813.451

Page 20 of 51
d² =6813.451 / 8
d = 29.18”

For Height of Beam


h = d + 2.5”
h = 29.18” + 2.5”
h = 31.68” or 32”

Area of Steel
Area of steel = ρ.b.d²
A(s) = (0.011/100) * (8”) * (29.18”) ^
 A(s) = 2.596 in²

Size of Reinforcement
Assume # 8 bars
r = 8/8 “

No. of steel bars


No. of steel bars = Area of Steel / Area of 1 Steel Bar
No. of steel bars = A(s) / (π/4. r²)
No. of steel bars = 2.595 / (π/4 * (8/8) ²)
No. of steel bars = 3.305 = 4 bars
No. of steel bars = 4

FOR CHECKING THE ADEQUECY


Mu = 304.5312 k-ft

Area of Steel (Revised)


New area of steel will be:
A(s) = (π/4. r²) * No of Bars
A(s) = (3.142/4 * (8/8) ²) * 4
A(s) = 3.141 in²
For (a)
a = A(s).fy / (0.85. f’c.b)

a = (3.141 * 60) / (0.85 * 4 * 8)


 a = 6.930 in²

Effective Depth
d = 32” – 0.5” – (8/8)” - (3/8)”
d = 29.1835 “
\

Page 21 of 51
Nominal Strength
Φ. Mn = Φ.A(s).fy. (d – a/2)
Φ. Mn = 0.9 * 3.141 * 60 * (29.625 – 6.930/2) / 12
Φ. Mn = 369.828 k.ft (Nominal)

Adequacy of the Beam


Mu ≤ Φ. Mn (Adequate)
304.5312 ≤ 369.828 (Beam is Adequate)
Where,
φ = 0.9 (For Tension Controlled Section)
ρ(max)= 0.6375 * ρ(b) : ρ(b) is ρ(balanced)
ρ(max)= 0.6375 * (0.85 * β1 * (f’c/fy) * (87/87 + fy) ) x 100
ρ(max)= 0.6375 * (0.85 * 0.85 *4/60 * (87/87+60) ) x 100
 ρ(max)= 1.81 %
ρ(min) = 200/fy = 200/60000
 ρ(min)= 0.33 %
Thus,
ρ(min) < ρ ≤ ρ(max)
“It is tension controlled Section”

Figure:

Page 22 of 51
BEAM ELEVATION:

BEAM SECTION

Page 23 of 51
Shear Design :
- Method:
 Calculate the factored shearing force, Vu, from the applied forces acting on the
structural member.
 The critical design shear value is at a section located at a distance d from the face of
the support.
 Calculate φVc
 If Av ≥ Av1 min
 [8λ(ρw)1/3 𝑓 𝑐 + ] bwd
 Then calculate φλ 𝑓 𝑐 bwd
 If Vc < φλ 𝑓 𝑐 bwd No shear reinforcement required
 If φλ 𝑓 𝑐 bwd < Vu < φVc– Min. R/F - #3@ max spacing
 If Vu > φVc– Design for Shear R/F
Spacing:
 Calculate the stirrups spacing based on the calculated S1 =
 Determine Max Spacing allowed by ACI -Smaller of S2 and S3
 S2 = ≤ 24 in- If Vs ≤ Vc1 = 4 𝑓 𝑐 bwd

 S3=
 Use smallest spacing to the nearest half inch For circular sections, the area used to
compute Vc is the diameter times the effective depth d, where d = 0.8 times the
diameter, ACI Code

SIMPLE SUPPORTED

- Procedure:
Known:
 b=8”
 d=29.625”
 h=32”
 Factored uniform load =1.2(DL)+1.6(LL)
 UDL=4.2296
SHEAR
= 4.2296 * 24/ 2
=50.7552k

Find critical shear

Page 24 of 51
50.7552/144 = x/144-29.625
X= 40.357k
Vc =40.357k

Calculate φVc
0.75{2 * (4000)^½ + 0} * 8 * 29.625 /1000
=22.389K

ρw=
Ρw = pi/4*(8/8)^2/8 * 29.25
ρw= 0.00423
Or
={8*0.75*(0.00423)^1/3*(4000)^½+0}*8*29.625/1000
=14.48k
Since V critical is greater shear reinforcement is required
Calculate Vc1 and Vc2
Vc1 =4 𝑓 𝑐 bwd
Vc1 =4 (4000) ^½*8*29.25 / 1000

Vc1 = 59.703 kips and fi Vc2=119.407kips


SPACING
Assume#3 bar –Area=0.11in2
Av=0.22 in2 for 2 legs
S1:
For S1 =
Vs=Vu-Vc/φ
Vs= (40.432-22.38)/0.75
Vs =24.05 k
𝑓𝑦𝑡= 60 ksi
d=29.625in
S1=16.319 in

S2=d/2≤24 “
S2=29.625/2=14.750”
S2 =14.750 in
S3
S3 =
S3 = 0.22 * 60000 / 50 * 8

S3=33.134in

S4 = 34.926

USE SPACING 14.750

Selection of vs check
Av,min =0.75*(f’c)^½(b*s/fyt)
=0.75*(4000)^½(8*14.750/60000)

Page 25 of 51
Av,min=0.093 in^2

Av,min=50*b*s/fyt
Av,min=50*8*14.750/60000
Av,min=0.098

CONTINOUS BEAM DESIGN


Procedure:

MAX MOMENT FROM ETABS = 220k-ft

Mu = Ru*bd²
Ru = φ*ρ*fy (1 – ρ*fy/1.7*f’c)
Assume:
ρ = 0.011 %
Ru = (0.9)*(0.011)*(60)*(1-(0.011)*(60)/(1.7)*(4))
 Ru = 0.536 ksi
For Dimensions
Mu = Ru.b.d²
Mu / Ru = b.d²
b.d² = 220*12/ 0.536
b.d² = 4925.37.31 in³
For depth of beam we assume base = 8”
b = 8”
bd² = 4925.3731 in³
d² = 4925.3731 / 8
d = 24.812”
d = 29.5”

For Height of Beam


h = d + 2.5”
h = 29.5” + 2.5”
h = 32”
Area of Steel
Area of steel = ρ.b.d
A(s) = (0.011) * (8”) * (29.5)
 A(s) = 2.596 in²

Size of Reinforcement
Assume # 9 bars
r = 9/8 “
No. of steel bars
No. of steel bars = Area of Steel / Area of 1 Steel Bar
No. of steel bars = A(s) / (π/4. r²)
No. of steel bars = 2.596 / (π/4 * (9/8) ²)
No. of steel bars = 2.6116 = 4 bars
No. of steel bars = 4
FOR CHECKING THE ADEQUECY

Page 26 of 51
Mu = 220 k-ft
For (a)
a = A(s). Nb.fy / (0.85. f’c.b)

a = (2.596 *4* 60) / (0.85 * 4 * 8)


 a = 22.9058 in²
Effective Depth
d = 29.5”-(3/8)-(4.5/8)-1.5
d = 27.0625“
Nominal Strength
Φ. Mn = Φ.A(s).fy. (d – a/2)
Φ. Mn = 0.9 * 2.596 * 4 *60 * (27.0625– 22.9058/2) / 12
Φ. Mn = 729.4053 k.ft (Nominal)

Adequacy of the Beam


Mu ≤ Φ. Mn (Adequate)
220 k-ft ≤ 729.4053 k-ft (X- Section is Adequate)
Where,
φ = 0.9 (For Tension Controlled Section)
ρ(max)= 0.6375 * ρ(b) : ρ(b) is ρ(balanced)
ρ(max)= 0.6375 * (0.85 * β1 * (f’c/fy) * (87/87 + fy) ) x 100
ρ(max)= 0.6375 * (0.85 * 0.85 *4/60 * (87/87+60) ) x 100
 ρ(max)= 1.807 %
ρ(min) = 200/fy = 200/60000
 ρ(min)= 0.33 %
Thus,
ρ(min) < ρ ≤ ρ(max)
“It is tension controlled Section”

Page 27 of 51
Figure:

Page 28 of 51
BEAM ELEVATION

BEAM SECTION

Page 29 of 51
Shear For Continuous Beam:
Maxmimum Shear From ETABS=74.05kips
Vmax=74.05

Using Similar Triangle:


74.05/144” = Vu / (144”-29.5”)
Vu = 58.880 kips (Critical Shear)

Calculate φVc
=0.75{2 * (4000) ^½ + 0} * 8 * 29.5 /1000
=22.38 kips

ρw= As/bw*d
Ρw = pi/4*(8/8)^2/8 * 29.25
ρw= 0.00423
Or
={8*0.75*(0.00423)^1/3*(4000)^½+0}*8*29.5/1000
=14.48k
Vu is greater than φVc
Shear is reinforced

Calculate φVc/2
ΦVc/2 = 22.38/2
ΦVc/2 = 11.19 kips

Calculate Vc1 and Vc2


Vc1 =4 (f’c) ^1/2bwd
Vc1 =4 (4000) ^½*8*29.5 / 1000
Vc1 = 59.70 kips

Vc2 = 8 (f’c) ^1/2bwd


Vc2 = 8 (4000) ^½*8*29.5/1000
Vc2 = 119.407 kips
Calculate Vs
Vs = Vu – Vc / Φ
Vs = 58.880-22.38 / 0.75
Vs = 48.667
Vs < Vc2 (No Section Revision)
Calculate Spacing
For S1
S1 = Avfyt * d/Vs
S1 = 0.22*60*29.5 / 48.667
S1 = 8”

For S2
S2 = 29.5 / 2
S2 = 14”

For S3

Page 30 of 51
S3 = 0.22 * 60000 / 0.75 * (4000) ^ ½ * 8
S3 = 33”
For S4
S4 = 0.22 * 60000 / 0.75 * (4000) ^ ½ * 8
S4 = 24.78 “
Now
ΦVn = ΦVc + ΦVs

For ΦVs
S1 = Avfyt*d/Vs
Or
Vs = Avfyt*d/S1
Vs = 0.22*60*29.5/16”
Vs =24.3375
ΦVs = 0.75*24.3375
ΦVs =18.2531

ΦVn = ΦVc + ΦVs


ΦVn = 22.38 + 18.2531
ΦVn = 40.6331
Using Similar Triangle
74.05/144 = 40.6331/X
X=79.016”
Similarly
74.05/144 = 11.19/X(No shear)
X(no shear)= 21.7604”

Page 31 of 51
Figure

SOLUTION BY EXCEL:

DESIGN OF COLUMN:

Page 32 of 51
DESIGN OF SIMPLY SUPPORTED BEAM:

Page 33 of 51
Page 34 of 51
DESIGN OF CONTINUOUS BEAM:

Page 35 of 51
Page 36 of 51
Footing Design:
METHOD

 Assume total depth of footing


 Calculate the effective soil pressure
Weight Footing = γ concrete × depth of footing
 Calculate Area of Footing
Area of Footing =Service load/Effective soil pressure(qa)
 Calculate Ultimate load
Pu= 1.2 D+1.6 L
 Net Upward pressure
qu=Pu/Area
 Check for one-way shear
The critical section is at a distance d from the face of the column. In the
Longitudinaldirection
Vu1=(L/2 - c/2−h)* qu*b
φVc= φ[2λ √ f'c/1000+Nu/6Ag]∗bw∗d
d=Vu1 / 4φ λ √ f'c * bw

 Check for Two-way shear


The critical section is at a distance d/2 from the face of the column
on 4 sides
The shearing force Vu2 for square column b0= 4 (c + d)
The shearing force Vu2 for rectangle column b0=2 [(c1 + d) + (c2 + d)]
The section is subjected to a vertical downward load, Pu, and a vertical upward
pressure, qu Therefore,
d=Vu2 / 4φλ √ f'c bo
b0= 4 c + deffective
Vu2= Pu − qu (c + h)2
β =longer / shorter
d1 =Vu2 / 4φλf√f′c bw
d2=Vu2 / φ(as∗deffective/b0+2)λsλ √ f'c b0
 Design steel reinforcement in the longitudinal direction.
The critical section is a face of supports
(L/2−C/2)
=qu2∗(L/2−C/2)2*b
Ru =Mu/bd2
As=ρ b d
Min As shrinkage= 0.0018bh
Min As Flexure= 0.0033bh
 For Shorter Side
Required Area per foot=As/Longer side

Spacing =Ab/Area per foot∗12

Page 37 of 51
 Check the bearing stress at the base of the column

Foundation Layout Plan:

Procedure:
Interior Footing Design

P (Service dead) = 50.6 kips

P (Service Live) = 17.87 kips

 Assume total depth of footing


Assume total depth of footing = 2ft

 Calculate the effective soil pressure


Weight Footing = γ concrete × depth of footing
Self-weight of footing = 7x7x150x2/1000 = 14.7 kips

P(Service dead) = 50.6 + 14.7 = 65.3 kips

Page 38 of 51
P(Service) = (65.3 + 17.87) x 4 = 332.68 kips

1 Calculate Ultimate load


Pu= 1.2 D+1.6 L
Pu= [1.2(65.3)+1.6(17.87)] x 4

Pu= 427.808 kips

 qa = 5 ksf
 Column size = 14”x14”

2 Assume Dimensions of Footing


7’x7’x2’

3 Effective Soil Pressure


qf = 150x2 = 300 psf
q(soil) = 100x2 = 200 psf
q(total) = 300+200 =500 psf
q(effective) = 5000-500
q(effective) = 4500 psf

4 Calculate Area of Footing


A = Ps/ q(eff)
A = 332.68 / 4.5
A =73.92 ft2

Assume one side = 8’


So, 73.935 / 8 = 9.24’ = 10’
So, our dimensions are 8’x10’

5 Ultimate Pressure
Effective soil pressure = qu = 427.808 / 8x10
Effective soil pressure = qu = 5.348 ksf
6 Check for One-Way Shear
The critical section is at a distance d from the face of the column. In the longitudinal
10 ft. direction

Vu1= (L/2−C/2-d)*qu*b
Vu1= (10/2−1.167/2-19.5/12)*5.348*8
Vu1= 119.43 kips

d=Vu1 / 2φ λ √ f'c * bw
d=119.43/2x0.75x1x √4ooo x8.5x12
d=15.736”
So,

Page 39 of 51
19.5” > 15.736” OKAY
7 Check for Two-Way Shear
Square column
bo=4(c+d)
bo=4(14+19.5)
bo=134 inch

Vu2=Pu-qu(c+d)^2
Vu2=427.808-5.34(1.167+19.5/12)^2
Vu2=386.181 kips

β =longer/shorter
β =10/8
β =1.25 < 2

d1=Vu2 / 4φ λ √ f'c * bo
d1=386.181x1000/4x0.75x1x √4ooo x134
d1=15.189”

d2=Vu2 / φ(as∗deffective/b0+2) λs λ √ f'c b0


Where, λs=1, as=40
d2=386.181x1000/0.75(40x19.5/150 +2)x1x1x √4000x134
d2=8.438 in
8 Design Steel Reinforcment In The Longitudinal Direction
Mu=qu/2(L/2-C/2)^2*b
Mu=5.34/2(10/2-1.167/2)^2*8
Mu=417.26 k-ft
Ru=Mu/bd^2
Ru=417.26x1000x12/8x12x19.5^2
Ru=137.166 psi
ρ=0.85x4/60 [1- √1-2x137.166/(0.85)(0.9)(4000)
ρ=0.003
As=ρ b d
As=0.003x8x12x19.5
As=5.616 in2
Min As shrinkage= 0.0018bh
Min As shrinkage=0.0018x8x12x24
Min As shrinkage= 4.4 in2
Min As Flexure= 0.0033bd
Min As Flexure= 0.0033x8x12x19.5
Min As Flexure= 6.24 (SELECTED)
For Shorter Side
Required Area per foot= As/Longer side
Required Area per foot= 6.24/8
Required Area per foot= 0.78 in2 /ft

Page 40 of 51
Spacing
Using # 7 bar
Spacing = Ab/Area per foot * 12
Spacing= 0.6013/0.78 * 12
Spacing =9.251
Spacing = 9” C/C

Corner And Edge Footing Design


 Assume total depth of footing
Assume total depth of footing = 2ft

 Calculate the effective soil pressure


Weight Footing = γ concrete × depth of footing
Self-weight of footing = 7x7x150x2/1000 = 14.7 kips

P(Service dead) = 32.488 + 14.7 = 47.1888 kips

P(Service) = (47.188 + 4.399) x 4 = 206.355kips

1 Calculate Ultimate load


Pu= 1.2 D+1.6 L
Pu= [1.2(47.1888)+1.6(4.399)] x 4

Pu= 254.665 kips

 qa = 5 ksf
 Column size = 14”x14”

2 Assume Dimensions of Footing


7’x7’x2’

3 Effective Soil Pressure


qf = 150x2 = 300 psf
q(soil) = 100x2 = 200 psf
q(total) = 300+200 =500 psf
q(effective) = 5000-500
q(effective) = 4500 psf

4 Calculate Area of Footing


A = Ps/ q(eff)
A = 206.355 / 4.5
A =45.857 ft2

Assume one side = 8’

Page 41 of 51
So, 45.857 / 8 = 5.73’ = 6’
So, our dimensions are 6’x8’

5 Ultimate Pressure
Effective soil pressure = qu = 254.655 / 6x8
Effective soil pressure = qu = 5.3055 ksf
6 Check for One-Way Shear
The critical section is at a distance d from the face of the column. In the longitudinal
10 ft. direction

Vu1= (L/2−C/2-d)*qu*b
Vu1= (8/2−1.167/2-19.5/12)*5.3055*6
Vu1= 57.0291 kips

d=Vu1 / 2φ λ √ f'c * bw
d=57.0291/2x0.75x1x √4ooo x8x6
d=12.524”
So,
19.5” > 12.524” OKAY
7 Check for Two-Way Shear
Square column
bo=4(c+d)
bo=4(14+19.5)
bo=134 inch

Vu2=Pu-qu(c+d)^2
Vu2=254.655-5.305(1.167+19.5/12)^2
Vu2=254.378 kips

β =longer/shorter
β =8/6
β =1.333 < 2

d1=Vu2 / 4φ λ √ f'c * bo

d1=254.378x1000/4x0.75x1x √4ooo x134


d1=10.003”

d2=Vu2 / φ(as∗deffective/b0+2) λs λ √ f'c b0


Where, λs=1, as=40
d2=254.378x1000/0.75(30x19.5/134.016+2)x1x1x √4000x134
d2=6.286 in
8 Design Steel Reinforcment In The Longitudinal Direction
Mu=qu/2(L/2-C/2)^2*b

Page 42 of 51
Mu=5.305/2(8/2-1.167/2)^2*6
Mu=185.785k-ft
Ru=Mu/bd^2
Ru=185.785x1000x12/6x12x19.5^2
Ru=6.785 psi
ρ=0.85x4/60 [1- √1-2x6.785/(0.85)(0.9)(4000)
ρ=0.001
As=ρ b d
As=0.001x6x12x19.5
As=1.404 in2
Min As shrinkage= 0.0018bh
Min As shrinkage=0.0018x6x12x24
Min As shrinkage= 3.1104 in2
Min As Flexure= 0.0033bd
Min As Flexure= 0.0033x6x12x19.5
Min As Flexure= 4.68(SELECTED)
For Shorter Side
Required Area per foot= As/Longer side
Required Area per foot= 4.68/6
Required Area per foot= 0.78 in2 /ft
Spacing
Using # 7 bar
Spacing = Ab/Area per foot * 12
Spacing= 0.6013/0.78 * 12
Spacing =9.251
Spacing = 9” C/C

Page 43 of 51
SLAB Design:
Slab Framing Plan

METHOD
Known:
 Weight density of concrete = 150 pcf
 Weight density of floor finishes = 144 pcf
 fy=60ksi
 f'c=4ksi
 Floor finishes = 3”
 Live Load for corridors = 100 psf

Formula:
 Ultimate load = 1.2Pd + 1.6PL
 Effective Depth = h – 1
 Mu=wl^2/10
 Ru=Mu/bd^2

Page 44 of 51
Design

Simply Supported Slab

 Factored Loads
Need to find out first the thickness of the slab

For Simply Supported Slab

h(min)= Span /20

h(min)= 8.333”/20

h(min)= 5”

 Self-Weight of the Slab


Ws = 5”/12 x150
Ws =62.5 psf
Screeding of 3”
Wsd = 3”/12 x 144
Wsd = 36 psf

 Total Dead Loads


Total dead load = 62.5 + 36
Total dead load = 98.5 psf
Live Load for corridor = 100 psf

 Factored Loads
Wu = [1.2(D)+1.6(L)]

Wu = [1.2(98.5)+1.6(100)]

Wu = 278.2 psf

Wu = 0.2782 k/ft

 Maximum Moment
Mu = Wul^2/8

Mu = (0.2782)(8.333)^2/8

Mu = 2.414 K-ft/ft

 Design
Mu = Rubd^2

For Ru

Ru=Mu/bd^2

Page 45 of 51
Where, b=12” and d=4”

Ru= 2.414/12x(4)^2

Ru= 0.15 ksi

ρ (req) = 0.85f’c/fy [1- √1-2Ru/ φ*0.85* f’c


ρ (req) = 0.85x4/60 [1- √1- 2x0.15/0.9(0.85)(4)
ρ (req) = 0.00284
ρ (min) > ρ (req)
Taking ρ (min)
ρ = 200/fy
ρ = (200/60000)
ρ = 0.003
As=ρ b d
As=0.0033X12X4
As=0.144 in^2/ft
Using # 3 bar
Area of # 3 bar = 0.11 in^2
S= 12Ab/As
S= 12(0.11)/0.144
S=9.16”
S=9”
Use #3@9”c/c

 Shrinkage (Secondary) Reinforcement


Ash=0.0018bh

Ash=0.0018X12X5

Ash=0.108 in^2

Using # 3 bar

S= 12Ab/As

S=12(0.11)/0.108

S=12”

Use #3@12”c/c

Two end Continuous Slab


h(min)= Span /28

h(min)= 11.88”/20
h(min)= 4.96” = 5”
 Moment from ETABS
Mu=5.619 k-ft/ft

Page 46 of 51
 Design
Mu = Rubd^2

For Ru

Ru=Mu/bd^2

Where, b=12”(Unit Width) and d=5-1=4””

Ru= 5.619/12x(4)^2x12

Ru= 0.351 ksi

ρ (req) = 0.85f’c/fy [1- √1-2Ru/ φ*0.85* f’c


ρ (req) = 0.85x4/60 [1- √1- 2x0.351/0.9(0.85)(4)
ρ (req) = 0.007
ρ = 200/fy
ρ = (200/60000)
ρ = 0.003
ρ (min) < ρ (req)
That’s why Taking ρ (req)

As=ρ b d
As=0.007X12X4
As=0.336 in^2
Using # 3 bar
Area of # 3 bar = 0.11 in^2
S= 12Ab/As
S= 12(0.11)/0.336
S=3.053”
S=3”
Use #3@3”c/c

 Shrinkage (Secondary) Reinforcement


Ash=0.0018bh

Ash=0.0018X12X5

Ash=0.108 in^2

Using # 3 bar

S= 12Ab/As

S=12(0.11)/0.108

S=12”

Use #3@12”c/c

Page 47 of 51
Solution By Excel
Corner, Interior and Edge Footing Design

Slab Design

Page 48 of 51
Final ETABS Output and Structural Design Validation
After completing the ETABS analysis, all structural members, including slabs, columns, and
beams, passed successfully without any severe failures. This confirms that the design for our
G+3 structure is robust and suitable for real-time implementation.

Analysis Overview:
1. ETABS Analysis Results:
The analysis was conducted under ultimate load conditions as per the ACI-318-09 Code.
All members demonstrated sufficient strength and stability, with no significant design
violations or overstressed elements.
The output drawings obtained from ETABS, showcasing reinforcement details for columns
and beams, aligned perfectly with the design requirements and reflected the original design
intent.

2. Load Testing:
The structure was subjected to ultimate load testing in ETABS, simulating realistic conditions
to ensure compliance with design standards.

Design Validation Through Multiple Approaches:


To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the design, several methods were employed:
1. Manual Calculations:
• Detailed calculations were performed manually to cross-verify the design parameters.
• These computations covered critical structural elements, including slabs, columns, and
beams, and adhered strictly to the governing codes.

2. Excel-Based Calculations:
• Spreadsheet tools were used to simplify and validate repetitive calculations.
• This approach ensured consistency and helped confirm the values obtained manually and
through ETABS.

3. ETABS Software Validation:


• Advanced finite element analysis was conducted using ETABS to simulate the structural
performance under various load combinations.
• The analysis reinforced the validity of the manual and Excel-based results, with minor,
negligible differences attributed to rounding or modeling assumptions.

Page 49 of 51
Page 50 of 51
Observations and Findings:
• Across all approaches, the ultimate loads and design outputs were nearly identical.
• The differences in values were minimal, showcasing the precision and reliability of
our design methodology.
• This consistency among manual, Excel-based, and software-derived results further
demonstrates that the structure is well-optimized and ready for implementation.

Conclusion:
The G+3 structure was rigorously tested and validated using a combination of manual
calculations, spreadsheet analysis, and ETABS software simulations. The uniformity in the
results across all methods confirms the structural integrity and suitability of the design for
real-time applications.
All necessary code provisions and design standards were adhered to, and the analysis outputs
reflect a strong, stable, and efficient structure. Therefore, this design can be confidently
implemented without hesitation.

Page 51 of 51
SCHEDULE
6.0"
6.0"
W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9
Key Plan:
5'

5'

UP RESTROOM FOR
CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM 8' FEMALES
35'x24' 35'x24' 35'x24' 19'x18'-6"

5' 6'
A-A 5' A-A
4' D7

D1 V1 D2 D3 V2 D4 D5 V3 D6
6.0"

D14 V4 D13 V5
CORRIDOR (141'-9')
D12 D11 V6 D10 D9 V7 D8
59'
DRAWING NOTES
6.0"
1. DOORS 4'X7'
A-A 2. WINDOWS 6'x4'
WASHROOM CLASSROOM
40'-10"x24'
CLASSROOM
40'-10""x24'
CLASSROOM
35'-4"x24'
3. ventilatior 17'x2'
23'x24'
4. Riser 6"
5. Tread 1"
6.0"
V7 W10 W11 W12 W13 W14 W15 W16 W17 W18 6. Wall thickness 6"
142'-10.0"

GROUND
6.0"
6.0"
W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 FLOOR W7 W8 W9 5'

5' Construction Drawings


UP RESTROOM FOR Project Location:
CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM 8' FEMALES N+1 Block Civil Eng Dept. NEDUET
35'x24' 35'x24' 35'x24' 19'x18'-6"

5' 6'
Drawing Title:
A-A 5' A-A Submission Drawing N-Block G+1
4' D7

D1 V1 D2 D3 V2 D4 D5 V3 D6
Group Members:
6.0"
59' 1. Muhammad Aqib Hameed
CORRIDOR (141'-9')
D14 V4 D13 V5 D12 D11 V6 D10 D9 V7 D8 (CE-22011)
2. Hafiz Muhammad Yaseen
6.0"
(CE-22014)
A-A 3. Muhammad Zaryab Ali
WASHROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM (CE22016)
23'x24' 40'-10"x24' 40'-10""x24' 35'-4"x24'
Scale: Sheet Size:
1 A-3
16"=1'-0"
V7 W10 W11 W12 W13 W14 W15 W16 W17 W18
6.0"

142'-10.0"
FIRST FLOOR
SCHEDULE
Key Plan:

DRAWING NOTES
1. DOORS 4'X7'
2. WINDOWS 6'x4'
2" THICK FLOOR FINISHES
3. ventilatior 17'x2'
SECTION A-A 4" THICK CC BED
6" THICK STONE SOILING 4. Riser 6"
5. Tread 1"
6. Wall thickness 6"

10'

5' OHWT Construction Drawings


PARAPET WALL
Project Location:
N+1 Block Civil Eng Dept. NEDUET

6.0" Drawing Title:


6' 6' Submission Drawing N-Block G+1
12'
4' 4' Group Members:
6.0" 1. Muhammad Aqib Hameed
(CE-22011)
2. Hafiz Muhammad Yaseen
(CE-22014)
6' 2' 6' 3. Muhammad Zaryab Ali
LINTEL LEVEL 7' (CE22016)
12'
4' 4'
6'-11.0" SILL LEVEL 3' Scale: Sheet Size:
1 A-3
FFL 16"=1'-0"

FRONT ELEVATION
1
SCHEDULE
165.5in 166.5in
1

76.5in
2-#8A 2-#8A
77.5in Key Plan:
2-#8B 2-#8B

RL:CB-18 - Rebar Table

Beam Label Span/Support Width Depth Bar A Bar B Bar C Bar D Bar E Bar F Bar G Zone A Zone B Zone C Zone D Zone E Elevation Type

2-#8G 2-#8G

2-#8F 2-#8F

CB-18 Support-1 - - 2-#8A 2-#8B - - - - - - - - - - Elevation 1


#3@6 #3@16 #3@6
- Span-1 8 32 - - - - - - - #3@6 - #3@16 - #3@6 -

- Support-2 - - 2-#8A 2-#8B - - - - - - - - - - -

296 in
1

SIMPLY SUPPORTED BEAM DETAILS


1
RL:CB-01 - Rebar Table
Drawing Notes:
166in 105in 166in
166in 105in 166in
1

3
Beam Label Span/Support Width Depth Bar A Bar B Bar C Bar D Bar E Bar F Bar G Zone A Zone B Zone C Zone D Zone E Elevation Type

77in 77in 77in


2-#8A 2-#8C
77in 77in 2-#8C 2-#8A
77in
2-#8B 2-#8D 2-#8D 2-#8B
CB-01 Support-1 - - 2-#8A 2-#8B - - - - - - - - - - Elevation 1

#3@16
- Span-1 8 32 - - - - - - - #3@6 - #3@16 - #3@6 -

- Support-2 - - - - 2-#8C 2-#8D - - - - - - - - -

2-#8G 2-#8J 2-#8J 2-#8G


- Span-2 8 32 - - - - - - - #3@6 - #3@16 - #3@6 -
2-#8F 2-#8H 2-#8H 2-#8F

#3@6 #3@16 #3@6 #3@6 #3@6 #3@6 #3@16 #3@6 - Support-3 - - - - 2-#8C 2-#8D - - - - - - - - -

- Span-3 8 32 - - - - - - - #3@6 - #3@16 - #3@6 -

- Support-4 - - 2-#8A 2-#8B - - - - - - - - - - -


296 in 108 in 296 in
1

CONTINOUS BEAM DETAILS 2-#8A+2-#8B

ISSUES:
141'-10.0"
S. No. Description Revision Approved by

1'-11.0" 3'-3.0" 2'-6.0"


1'-3.0" 6.0"

32 in
2'-10.0"
8'-5.0"
10' 9'-1.0" 8'-2.0" 4' 8'-8.0" 9'-5.0" 10'-2.0" 2' 10'-8.0" 11'-5.0" 12'-2.0" 11'-3.0" 5'-9.0" 5'-6.0" 2'-11.0"
Drawing Status:

#3@6

Client:

Contractor:
2-#8F+2-#8G

19'-6.0" Consultant:
8 in

Project Name:
SIMPLY SUPPORTED BEAM
Drawing Title:
SECTION Slab Framing and Reinforcement Details
5'-6.0" Drawn By: Designed By: Approved By:
2-#8A+2-#8B

E.Z.H E.Z.H E.Z.H


Sheet Size: Sheet Scale: Issue Date
58' 8' A3 As Shown 02 / 04 / 2024
Project Number:
07 Revison No.:
Drawing Number:
-
S - 605

32 in
25'
#3@6

2-#8F+2-#8G

8 in

CONTINOUS BEAM SECTION

BEAM Layout Plan


SCHEDULE
Key Plan:

Reinforcment Schdule For Column RL

#3@6in
12" 14"

1.5"

Numbers

#3@6in
Column

Main Reinforcement
Column
1.5"

Tie Bar
I.D

Bars
Cross Section

152 in
12"
#3@8"c/c 6-#4

#3@18in
14" #3@8"c/c
Drawing Notes:

C1 12'X12' 30 6#4 6#4 Bars


1
2
1
2

#3@6in
#3@8"c/c 1" TF

C1
8#4

#3@6in
1"
C2
C2 22 10#4

#3@6in
14'X14' #3@8"c/c
6-#4

152 in
ISSUES:

#3@18in
S. No. Description Revision Approved by

142'-2.0"
1 1
2 2

#3@6in
3'-3.5" SF
1'-7.4" 2'-9.4" 3'-11.4" 1'-11.7" 1'-3.8" 2'-5.7"
2'-7.6" 8.0"
Drawing Status:

#3@6in
10'-3.3" 9'-1.3" 7'-11.2" 8'-7.2" 9'-3.1" 11'-8.3" 4'-11.7" 9'-3.0"
9'-10.9" 10'-6.9" 11'-2.7" 11'-10.6" 6'-9.3"

Client:

#3@6in
C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1

Contractor:
6-#4

152 in
Consultant:

#3@18in
24'-8.0"
Project Name:

1 1 Drawing Title:
2 2 Slab Framing and Reinforcement Details

#3@6in
C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2
C1 C2 C2
FF
Drawn By: Designed By: Approved By:
E.Z.H E.Z.H E.Z.H

#3@6in
58'-4.0" 9' Sheet Size: Sheet Scale: Issue Date
C2
A3 As Shown 02 / 04 / 2024
C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2
C2
Project Number:

#3@6in
C1

07 Revison No.:
Drawing Number:
6-#4 -
S - 605

152 in

#3@18in
24'-8.0"

1 1
2 2

#3@6in
C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1
C1 C1 C1 C1 C1
GL
6-#4

1 1

#3@6in
2 2

36 in

#3@6in
CS-01:Full Elevation-2
(Scale = 1:4)

COLUMN Layout Plan


SCHEDULE
Foundation Reinforcement Details Key Plan:

ID Size Bottom Reinforcement Top Reinforcement


S1 S2 S1' S2'

F-1 6'x8' #7@ 9" c/c


- -
F-2 8'x10' #7@ 9" c/c #7@ 9" c/c #7@ 9" c/c #7@ 9" c/c
Drawing Notes:
4" A 4"

4"
142'-2.0"
S1
B C D E F G H I J K L M N O Q
P R U V W
A S T

S2
B
3'-3.5"
1'-7.4" 2'-9.4" 3'-11.4" 1'-11.7" 1'-3.8" 2'-5.7"
2'-7.6" 8.0"
10'-3.3" 9'-1.3" 7'-11.2" 8'-7.2" 9'-3.1" 11'-8.3" 4'-11.7" 9'-3.0"
9'-10.9" 10'-6.9" 11'-2.7" 11'-10.6" 6'-9.3"

1
ISSUES:
F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1
S. No. Description Revision Approved by

4"
24'-8.0" ISOLATED FOOTING
Drawing Status:

Client:
F1 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2
2
Contractor:
F1

58'-4.0" 9'
Consultant:

3 8' Project Name:


F1 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2 F2
F1

F2
Drawing Title:
Slab Framing and Reinforcement Details
10'
Drawn By: Designed By: Approved By:
E.Z.H E.Z.H E.Z.H
24'-8.0"
Sheet Size: Sheet Scale: Issue Date
A3 As Shown 02 / 04 / 2024
8' Project Number:
07 Revison No.:
Drawing Number:
-
4
6' S - 605
F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1

Foundation Layout Plan


FOOTING SECTION
SCHEDULE
Key Plan:

142'-2.0"

B C D E F G H I J K L M N O Q R
P U V W
A S T

3'-3.5"
1'-7.4" 2'-9.4" 3'-11.4" 1'-11.7" 1'-3.8" 2'-5.7"
2'-7.6" 8.0"
10'-3.3" 9'-1.3" 7'-11.2" 8'-7.2" 9'-3.1" 11'-8.3" 4'-11.7" 9'-3.0"
9'-10.9" 10'-6.9" 11'-2.7" 11'-10.6" 6'-9.3"

1
Drawing Notes:

24'-8.0"

ISSUES:
S. No. Description Revision Approved by

#3@12"c/c
58'-4.0" 9' S-1
#3@9"c/c
Drawing Status:
3

Client:

#3@3"c/c
Contractor:

Consultant:

S-2 Project Name:


24'-8.0"

Drawing Title:
#3@12"c/c Slab Framing and Reinforcement Details

Drawn By: Designed By: Approved By:


E.Z.H E.Z.H E.Z.H
Sheet Size: Sheet Scale: Issue Date
4 A3 As Shown 02 / 04 / 2024
Project Number:
07 Revison No.:
Drawing Number:
-
S - 605

First Floor Slab Reinforcement Schedule Lx Ly


Slab Framing Plan ID Thickness Bottom Reinforcement
Shorter
Dimension
Longer
Dimension
Ly/Lx Type
Short Way Long Way

S-1 6" #3 @ 9" c/c #3 @ 12" c/c 8.33' 141.5' =16>2 One Way
#3 @ 3" c/c #3 @ 12" c/c 11.4' 24'' =2.15>2 One Way
S-2 6"

You might also like