IMJRISE V1 (7) 079-084 - 10 English Language Education in The Philippines Policy Landscape and Future Directions
IMJRISE V1 (7) 079-084 - 10 English Language Education in The Philippines Policy Landscape and Future Directions
Francisca T. Uy
ECT Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Inc., Buanoy, Balamban, Cebu, Philippines
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2180-5874
Yancy B. Dogomeo
PAU Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Inc., Mercado St., Poblacion, Toledo City, Cebu, Philippines
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5000-8105
Estrella G. Doroy
PAU Excellencia Global Academy Foundation, Inc., Mercado St., Poblacion, Toledo City, Cebu, Philippines
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3929-8612
Abstract:
This study examines English Language Education (ELE) in the Philippines, focusing on policies, challenges, and
prospects. Through a systematic review of literature, it identifies key issues shaping ELE. Policy fragmentation has
hindered effective implementation, with initiatives like the Bilingual Education Policy facing criticism and disparities.
Teacher capacity and training pose significant challenges due to shortages of qualified English teachers and
inadequate training programs. Language competency decline persists, attributed to literature-focused curricula and
resource shortages. Despite challenges, prospects for multilingual education and global competence are
recognized, with initiatives like Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education showing promise. The study
emphasizes the need for coherent policies, improved teacher training, and balanced language approaches to
enhance language proficiency. Embracing multilingual education can prepare Filipino students for success in the
globalized world. Addressing these challenges and leveraging linguistic diversity can lead to more effective English
language education in the Philippines.
Keywords: English Language Education, Philippines, Policies, Bilingual Education, Teacher Training
Introduction:
English language education in the Philippines is a topic of significant interest, particularly in light of the country's
integration into the ASEAN community and its aspirations to become a regional education hub. As English serves as
the official language of ASEAN, the demand for proficient English speakers has intensified (Minh, 2013). The
Philippines, along with other ASEAN member countries, has been striving to enhance English proficiency among its
workforce and students to meet the demands of globalization (ICEF Monitor, 2012).
In recent years, there has been a growing sense of urgency to improve English language education due to
economic factors as well. The Philippines has positioned itself as a major Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) hub,
generating significant revenue and employment opportunities due to its English-proficient workforce (Espina,
2015). Moreover, English proficiency has become crucial for overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) whose remittances
contribute significantly to the Philippine economy (Magtulis, 2013).
INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH
FOR INNOVATION, SUSTAINABILITY, AND EXCELLENCE (IMJRISE)
https://risejournals.org/index.php/imjrise 80 ㅤ
Volume 1, Issue no. 7 (2024)
ISSN: 3028-032X (online) | ISSN: 3028-0370 (print)
Despite these opportunities, English language education in the Philippines faces various challenges. The results of
the National Achievement Test (NAT) administered by the Department of Education (DepEd) reveal a continuous
decline in learning outcomes, especially in basic education (Department of Education, 2012). Issues such as
inadequate resources, teacher competency, and curriculum problems hinder the effective teaching and learning of
English.
This study aims to delve into the policies, problems, and prospects of English language education in the Philippines.
By examining historical trends, current policies, and emerging challenges, this research seeks to provide insights
into the evolving landscape of English language education in the country and explore potential avenues for
improvement.
Literature Review:
English language education in the Philippines has undergone significant changes over time, influenced by historical,
political, and socio-economic factors. This literature review examines key studies, policies, and issues related to
English language education (ELE) in the Philippines, focusing on policies, problems, and prospects.
English language education in the Philippines has its roots in the country's colonial history. With the arrival of
American colonizers in 1898, English became the medium of instruction in schools (Martin, 2008). The American
colonial project aimed to "civilize" Filipinos by promoting English literacy (University of Illinois, 1908). This
historical influence shaped the trajectory of English education in the country.
Language-in-education policies have undergone changes over the years. The Bilingual Education Policy (BEP) of
1974 aimed to balance English and Filipino (formerly Pilipino) as mediums of instruction (Gonzalez, 1990).
However, debates and contradictions in language policies persist. Policies like Executive Order No. 210 in 2003
emphasized strengthening English as a second language (Quezon III, 2007), while issues of language
marginalization and nationalism continue (Gallego & Zubiri, 2011).
The Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013, also known as the K to 12 program, introduced reforms to extend basic
education to 12 years, including enhancements in English language instruction (Plata, 2013). However,
implementation challenges remain, particularly in resource-constrained public schools.
Teacher capacity and training have been identified as major challenges. Many teachers lack adequate training in
English language teaching (Plata, 2007), and there's a shortage of qualified English teachers, exacerbated by the
exodus of competent teachers seeking better opportunities abroad (Plata, 2013).
Resource constraints in public schools, such as overcrowded classrooms and lack of materials, hinder effective
English language instruction (Gonzalez, 2003). Limited access to textbooks and other learning materials affects the
quality of education. Curriculum alignment and assessment practices pose challenges. There's a need for coherence
between curriculum goals, assessment practices, and instructional methods (Plata, 2010). Assessment frameworks
often focus on knowledge-based assessments rather than skills development (Plata, 2007).
The decline in learning outcomes, as evidenced by standardized test scores like the National Achievement Test
(NAT), indicates ongoing challenges in English language education (Department of Education, 2012). Issues such
as low proficiency levels and inadequate language skills persist. Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education
(MTBMLE) has emerged as a prospect for improving English language education by integrating local languages into
the curriculum (Bautista et al., 2009). MTBMLE has shown positive effects on learning outcomes in early grades.
Investments in teacher training and professional development are crucial for improving English language
instruction (Plata, 2013). Continuous training programs can enhance teacher competencies and classroom
practices. Curriculum reforms focusing on modern teaching methodologies, technology integration, and learner-
centered approaches can enhance English language education (Plata, 2010). Technology can provide access to
resources and support interactive learning environments. English proficiency is vital for economic opportunities,
particularly in BPO industries and global employment (Espina, 2015). Strengthening English language skills can
enhance the country's competitiveness in the global market.
English language education in the Philippines faces various challenges, including teacher competency issues,
resource constraints, curriculum alignment problems, and declining learning outcomes. However, prospects for
improvement exist through multilingual education approaches, teacher training, curriculum reform, and leveraging
economic opportunities. Addressing these issues is crucial for the country's educational advancement and global
competitiveness.
Methodology:
INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH
FOR INNOVATION, SUSTAINABILITY, AND EXCELLENCE (IMJRISE)
https://risejournals.org/index.php/imjrise 81 ㅤ
Volume 1, Issue no. 7 (2024)
ISSN: 3028-032X (online) | ISSN: 3028-0370 (print)
A systematic review approach was employed to investigate English language education (ELE) policies, problems,
and prospects in the Philippines. The systematic review followed established guidelines to ensure a comprehensive
and rigorous synthesis of existing literature. A systematic search was conducted across electronic databases
including Google Scholar, ERIC, JSTOR, and Scopus. The search terms used included combinations of keywords
such as "English language education," "Philippines," "language policies," "challenges," "teacher training," and
"language proficiency." Boolean operators "AND" and "OR" were used to refine the search.
Initially, titles and abstracts were screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Selected studies
underwent full-text assessment for final inclusion. Any discrepancies during study selection were resolved through
discussion.
Data were extracted from the included studies using a predetermined form. Key information extracted included
author(s), publication year, study aim, methodology, key findings related to ELE policies, problems, and prospects.
The quality of included studies was assessed using predefined criteria adapted from relevant guidelines for
systematic reviews. The criteria included study design, methodology, sample size, data collection methods, and
analysis techniques.
Data synthesis involved organizing and summarizing findings from included studies thematically. Key themes
related to ELE policies, problems, and prospects were identified and synthesized to provide a comprehensive
overview.
The Bilingual Education Policy (BEP), introduced to balance English and Filipino as mediums of instruction,
exemplifies the challenges of policy implementation. Despite its intentions to promote bilingualism, the BEP has
faced criticism and encountered difficulties in execution, leading to disparities in academic achievement across
different regions of the Philippines (Gonzalez, 1990).
Gonzalez (1990) discusses the impact of the BEP on academic achievement, highlighting how the policy favored
Tagalog-speaking regions and students, widening the gap between Manila and non-Manila areas. This uneven
implementation raised concerns about equitable access to quality education and the marginalization of non-Tagalog
languages.
Similarly, Plata (2010) points out the lack of coherence in ELE policies, noting that despite efforts to implement
bilingual education, there was a disconnect between policy intent and practice. The study reveals challenges in
aligning curriculum, assessment, and instructional practices with policy directives, leading to inconsistencies in
educational outcomes.
Furthermore, the introduction of various policies without proper coordination has led to confusion among educators
and stakeholders. Licuanan (2007) criticizes the lack of unity and coherence in language education policies,
particularly regarding the use of English as the medium of instruction. This fragmentation has hindered efforts to
introduce systemic reforms in ELE.
Addressing policy fragmentation requires a concerted effort to ensure alignment, consistency, and effective
implementation across all levels of education. Policies should consider the diverse linguistic landscape of the
Philippines and aim for inclusivity and equity in language education.
One significant challenge is the exodus of competent teachers seeking better employment opportunities abroad.
Bautista (1996) highlights this issue, indicating that many qualified teachers leave the country in pursuit of higher-
paying jobs overseas. This brain drain further exacerbates the shortage of skilled English teachers within the
Philippine education system.
Inadequate training for teaching English in diverse contexts is another pressing issue. Licuanan (2007) discusses
how many teachers lack the necessary training to effectively teach English, especially in multilingual settings.
INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH
FOR INNOVATION, SUSTAINABILITY, AND EXCELLENCE (IMJRISE)
https://risejournals.org/index.php/imjrise 82 ㅤ
Volume 1, Issue no. 7 (2024)
ISSN: 3028-032X (online) | ISSN: 3028-0370 (print)
Teaching English to students with varying linguistic backgrounds requires specialized skills that many teachers may
not possess.
Shortages of qualified English teachers contribute to the challenges in ELE. With the demand for English instruction
increasing, there is a persistent shortage of teachers who are proficient in English and adequately trained to teach
the language (Bautista, 1996). This shortage affects the quality of instruction, particularly in public schools where
resources are limited.
The quality of teacher education programs is also under scrutiny. Licuanan (2007) points out concerns regarding
the alignment of teacher training programs with the demands of ELE. Many education programs may not
adequately prepare teachers to address the complexities of language teaching, leading to gaps in teacher
competence.
Furthermore, there is a need to ensure that teacher training programs are aligned with evolving pedagogical
approaches and language teaching methodologies. Continuous professional development is essential to equip
teachers with the skills needed to adapt to changing educational landscapes (Licuanan, 2007).
Addressing teacher capacity and training issues requires comprehensive strategies. Improving teacher education
programs, providing ongoing professional development opportunities, and incentivizing teachers to stay within the
country are vital steps toward enhancing the quality of English instruction.
One contributing factor is the emphasis on literature-based English Language Education (ELE) curricula. Plata
(2007) notes that the focus on literature may not effectively develop language skills among students. Literature-
based approaches often prioritize literary analysis over language acquisition, which may not address the practical
language needs of learners.
Moreover, the lack of focus on language skills development is a significant issue. While literature has its place in
language education, the neglect of language skills such as speaking, listening, and writing could hinder students'
overall language proficiency (Plata, 2007).
Large class sizes pose another challenge to language instruction. The Department of Education (2012)
acknowledges that some public schools in the Philippines face overcrowded classrooms, with class sizes reaching as
high as 75 students or more. In such environments, individualized attention and effective language practice
become difficult to achieve.
Inadequate learning materials also contribute to the decline in language proficiency. Plata (2007) discusses how
shortages of textbooks and other resources result in a lack of practice opportunities for students. The ratio of
students to available learning materials can be as high as 1:10, which means many students do not have access to
sufficient materials for language learning.
Furthermore, the results of the National Achievement Test (NAT) administered by the Department of Education
reflect the continuing deterioration of learning outcomes in basic education in the country (Department of
Education, 2012). Scores have consistently fallen below the desired passing rate of 75%, indicating a widespread
challenge in language competency.
The decline in language competency and proficiency has implications beyond the classroom. English proficiency is
crucial for various sectors, including business process outsourcing (BPO) and overseas employment. Without
adequate language skills, Filipino workers may face challenges in accessing job opportunities and contributing
effectively to the workforce (Kilag, et al., 2023).
Addressing the decline in language competency requires comprehensive reforms in ELE. There is a need to
rebalance curricula to include more focus on language skills development alongside literature-based approaches.
Additionally, efforts to reduce class sizes, improve learning materials, and enhance teaching methods are essential.
The Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTBMLE) program has gained traction as a promising approach
to improve education outcomes by utilizing students' native languages as a medium of instruction in the early
years of schooling. Bernardo et al. (2009) conducted studies showing that using the mother tongue in the
classroom helps students learn better and improves their overall academic performance. MTBMLE not only
facilitates learning but also preserves and values indigenous languages, contributing to cultural diversity and
identity (Kilag, et al., 2023).
Moreover, initiatives to strengthen English proficiency continue to be crucial in preparing Filipino students for global
engagement. English remains a vital language for international communication, trade, and employment
opportunities. Gallego and Zubiri (2011) emphasizes the importance of English proficiency in enhancing
competitiveness and facilitating connections with the global community.
However, implementing effective multilingual education and strengthening English proficiency face several
challenges. One challenge is the linguistic diversity within the Philippines. With over 170 languages spoken across
the archipelago, crafting language policies that accommodate this diversity while meeting global language demands
is complex (Bernardo et al., 2009).
Another challenge is the need for balanced language policies. While promoting the use of mother tongues in
education is important for learning outcomes and cultural preservation, it must be balanced with the need for
English proficiency to meet global communication needs and economic demands (Gallego & Zubiri, 2011).
Effective implementation strategies are crucial for the success of multilingual education initiatives. Bernardo et al.
(2009) stress the importance of providing adequate training and support for teachers in implementing MTBMLE
effectively. Teachers need resources, professional development, and pedagogical support to teach effectively in
multilingual settings.
Furthermore, ensuring equitable access to quality education in both urban and rural areas is essential. Gallego and
Zubiri (2011) highlights the need for infrastructure development, teacher training programs, and access to learning
materials to be prioritized, especially in underserved regions.
Despite these challenges, there are opportunities for multilingual education to foster global competence among
Filipino learners (Kilag, et al., 2023). By valuing and incorporating diverse languages and cultures into education,
students can develop not only language skills but also intercultural understanding and empathy, essential for global
citizenship.
The prospects for multilingual education and global competence in the Philippines are promising but face challenges
in implementation. Balancing the promotion of mother tongue languages with the need for English proficiency,
providing adequate support for teachers, and ensuring equitable access to education are crucial steps towards
addressing these challenges and preparing Filipino learners for success in a globalized world.
Conclusion:
The study examined the landscape of English Language Education (ELE) in the Philippines, focusing on policies,
challenges, and prospects. Through a systematic review of literature, key issues have been identified, shedding
light on the complexities surrounding ELE in the country.
Policy fragmentation has been a significant challenge in ELE implementation. Despite the introduction of various
policies aimed at addressing language education, such as the Bilingual Education Policy (BEP), inconsistencies and
disparities in implementation have hindered their effectiveness (Gonzalez, 1990; Plata, 2010).
Teacher capacity and training have also emerged as critical concerns. The exodus of competent teachers,
inadequate training programs, and shortages of qualified English teachers have posed obstacles to delivering
quality language education (Bautista, 1996; Licuanan, 2007).
Language competency and proficiency among students have been declining, attributed to literature-based curricula
and insufficient focus on language skills development (Department of Education, 2012; Plata, 2007). Factors like
large class sizes and inadequate learning materials further compound this issue.
Despite these challenges, there are promising prospects for multilingual education and global competence.
Initiatives such as Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTBMLE) and efforts to strengthen English
proficiency aim to address these needs (Bernardo et al., 2009; Guinigundo, 2013). However, challenges remain in
reconciling linguistic diversity with global language demands and ensuring effective policy implementation.
INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH
FOR INNOVATION, SUSTAINABILITY, AND EXCELLENCE (IMJRISE)
https://risejournals.org/index.php/imjrise 84 ㅤ
Volume 1, Issue no. 7 (2024)
ISSN: 3028-032X (online) | ISSN: 3028-0370 (print)
Addressing the challenges in English language education requires coordinated efforts from policymakers, educators,
and stakeholders. There is a need for coherent policies, improved teacher training, and curriculum reforms to
enhance language proficiency among Filipino learners. Embracing multilingual education can not only improve
learning outcomes but also foster global competence essential for success in the 21st-century world.
References:
Bautista, C., Bernardo, A., & Ocampo, D. (2008). When reforms don’t transform.
Gallego, M. K., & Zubiri, L. A. (2011). MTBMLE in the Philippines: Perceptions, attitudes and outlook. Frontiers of
language and teaching, 2, 405-414.
Gonzalez, A. (2003). Language planning in multilingual countries: The case of the Philippines . Manila, Philippines:
Andrew Gonzalez. https://software.sil.org/
ICEF Monitor. (2012). Opportunities await foreign education educational providers as Thailand prepares for ASEAN
community. https://monitor.icef.com/2013/05/opportunities-await-foreign-educational-providers-as-thailand-
prepares-for-asean-community/
Kilag, O. K., Dumdum, J. N., Quezon, J., Malto, L., Mansueto, D., & Delfino, F. (2023). The Pedagogical Potential of
Poems: Integrating Poetry in English Language Teaching. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of
Education (2994-9521), 1(1), 42-55.
Kilag, O. K. T., Jimenez, J. R., Diano Jr, F. M., Balicoco, J. R. M., Echavez Jr, A. M., & Labasano, A. S. C. (2023).
Developing K-2 Filipino children English language oral proficiency through concrete poetry teaching. Science and
Education, 4(2), 886-895.
Kilag, O. K. T., Catubay, R. C. F., Balicoco, J. R. M., Contado, M. B., Yray, F. S., & Bendanillo, A. A. (2023). Anxiety
in English Language and Motivation to Learning among EEGAFI Senior High School Students: Case
Study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION IN NONFORMAL EDUCATION, 3(6), 60-67.
Martin, I. P. (2008). Colonial education and the shaping of Philippine literature in English. Philippine English:
Linguistic and literary perspectives, 245-59.
Minh, L. (2014). Message at the ASEAN business forum, 14 November 2014. https://asean.org/wp-
content/uploads/2021/05/14-November-2014_Message_ASEAN-Business-Forum.pdf
Plata, S. (2013). Standard-based assessment and grading in K to 12 education in the Philippines. Philippine Journal
of Language Teaching, 53, 6-16.
Plata, S. (2010). Standards and assessment in the 2010 English curriculum for high school: A Philippine case
study. Philippine ESL Journal, 5, 83-101.
Plata, S. M. (2017). Identifying gaps between DepEd’s Assessment Reform and CHED’s Teacher preparation
Program. In Proceedings of DLSU Research Congress 2012. Manila, the Philippines: De La Salle University.
University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign campus). (1908). Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Illinois
Industrial University.