ABGD 2014 Adhesion to Enamel & Dentin
ABGD 2014 Adhesion to Enamel & Dentin
ADHESIVE SUBSTRATES:
ENAMEL BONDING
1. Enamel
a. Composition 1. Predictable & Durable
i. 86% Inorganic (Hydroxyapatite) 2. Technique insensitive
ii. 2% Organic (Collagen) 3. Micromechanical
iii. 12% H2O 4. Enamel Etching
b. Homogeneous Structure a. 30-40% H3PO4
2. Dentin b. 15 sec/”frosty” appearance
a. Composition c. 15 sec rinse adequate to remove precipitates
i. 50% HA d. Effective etch 10 microns deep
ii. 30% Collagen 5. Penetration w/ hydrophobic monomers
iii. 20% H2O
b. Variable
i. Primary vs Secondary vs Tertiary
ii. Sclerotic/Hypermineralized
DENTIN BONDING
iii. Tubule size/density 1. Unpredictable & durability questionable
iv. Tubular fluid flow 2. Technique Sensitive
v. Smear layer 3. Micromechanical & chemical (Self-etch)
vi. Hypomineralized (caries/erosion) 4. Dentin Conditioning
a. “Total Etch” – H3PO4
b. Self-Etch – acidic monomers
c. Depth of demineralization varies with strength
of conditioner
5. Hybridization with hydrophilic primers and
hydrophobic adhesives (2 & 1 steps)
ADHESIVES
2 STEP ETCH & RINSE ADHESIVES (2E&Ra) 2 STEP ETCH & RINSE ADHESIVES (2E&Ra)
th
1. Previously known as 5 generation 1. Etching: Similar to 3E&Ra
2. Combine primer and adhesive steps (Simplified) a. Dentinal moisture level more sensitive than 3E&Ra
3. Comparable SBS to 3E&Ra upon initial application b. No rewetting effect of primers
4. Resultant hybrid layer contains hydrophilic monomers 2. Priming & Bonding
without benefit of overlying hydrophobic layer; “semi- a. reduced penetration to depth of demineralization
permeable”- increases hydrolytic degradation of bond b. Should be applied with extended application times and
5. Suboptimal polymerization & increased water sorption - multiple coats
decreases stability /durability of bond c. Should use vigorous rubbing application mode
6. Higher conc. of solvents; more residual solvent – further 3. Due to high use of highly volatile acetone solvent, subject to
decreases polymerization & strength evaporation of solvent and loss of efficacy over time
7. Higher frequency of acetone use in this class 4. May by incompatible with dual cure and self-cure composite
8. As a class, among the worst performing adhesives core materials and luting cements – pH dependent
Self-etching adhesives can also be classified according to the relative pH of their self-etching conditioners. This
is useful as the self-etching adhesives with ultra-mild to intermediately strong conditioners significantly
outperformed those using strong conditioners. Conditioner strength influenced the management of the smear
layer & depth of demineralization as shown in the graphic below.
SELF-ETCHING ADHESIVES
1. Conditioners are acidified monomers which solubilize or 6. Many contain functional monomers which form chemical
remove the smear layer and demineralize dentin to ionic bonds to hydroxyapatite
varying depths based on their pH a. 10-MDP (Clearfil) +++
2. Conditioners are not rinsed off b. 4-META ++
3. Do not etch enamel well, so “selective etch” of enamel
with H3PO4 is advocated to improve marginal
adaptation/decrease staining.
4. Simultaneous demineralization & hybridization
5. Less technique sensitive than etch and rinse adhesives
2SEa-m
3E&Ra
1SEa-s
2E&Ra
2SEa-s