wew
wew
It does not take one long to reach the disclaimer in a set of design
standards like those listed above. Sometimes this disclaimer can be found in
the preface, where it says something like, “While these data have been
prepared in accordance with recognized engineering principles and are based
on the most accurate and reliable technical data available, they should not be
used or relied upon for any general or specific application without competent
professional examination and verification ...” [Ref. 2.17].
While, in a way, this may frustrate an engineer looking for the answer in a
reference, it should also serve as a signal for the responsibility the engineer
carries in any design. Salmon and Johnson’s quote at the beginning of this
section illustrates the point quite nicely. Design specifications are essential tools
which the bridge engineer uses in cobbling together a design, but by no means
do they offer a uniform template for punching out final contract documents.
In this text we will look at several basic design examples which act as an
excellent guide through the design process. These examples, however, cannot
possibly cover every aspect of design which an engineer will encounter. In one
sense, this is what makes bridge engineering so challenging. Even a set of
structures in the same contract submission will offer distinctly different design
problems for each bridge.
One bridge may have footings on rock, while another requires piles. A
structure on a straight alignment leading into another on a horizontal curve can
make a world of difference between two apparently identical structures only a
few hundred feet apart. The design should define the boundary conditions and T he design should define the
boundary conditions and the
specifications should apply to
the specifications should apply to those constraints, not the other way around.
The bridge engineer should also think to question and improve upon those constraints, not the other
reference design material whenever possible. This does not mean that one way around.
should begin to question things like the HS20-44 design vehicle, but items like