Research Concept Draft
Research Concept Draft
Research Questions
1. What is the frequency and duration of stock-outs of essential oncology drug at MTRH?
2. How affordable are the standard hematologic oncology regimen drugs used in treating
childhood cancers at MTRH?
3. ?
Methodology
Study Design:
A mixed-methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative data collection.
Quantitative Component:
A retrospective analysis of drug procurement and stock-out data from MTRH’s pharmacy records
in 2024. A ten-drug list will be selected of relevance to stock-outs, essential and standard, wide
coverage and cost-effective to ensure validity and reliability. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be
conducted using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year
(QALY) for key drugs.
Qualitative Component:
Structured interviews with key stakeholders, including pharmacists, oncologists, procurement
officers, and hospital administrators, to explore determinants of drug availability and
affordability. Structured format questionnaires and mixed question types combining Likert
scales, multiple-choice, and open-ended questions will be used for depth and flexibility.
Study Population:
Quantitative: Pharmacy records of oncology drugs used in childhood cancers at MTRH.
Qualitative: Key stakeholders involved in drug procurement and administration at MTRH.
Inclusion Criteria
Patient Population: Children (aged 0–18 years) diagnosed with one of the five most
common childhood cancers in Western and Central Kenya (regional scope)
o Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
o Wilms Tumor (Nephroblastoma)
o Burkitt Lymphoma
o Retinoblastoma
o Rhabdomyosarcoma
Drugs: Only include the top 10 oncology drugs used in the study that are listed in both
the Kenya 2019 Essential Drugs List and the WHO Pediatric Essential Drugs List and the
frequency of the stock-outs.
Time Frame: Pharmacy records and patient data from the past 12 or 6 months (to ensure
relevance and feasibility).
Data Availability: Only include drugs and patients with complete records (e.g., drug
dispensation, stock levels, and patient outcomes).
Exclusion Criteria
Patient Population: Children with cancers not among the five most common in the region
(e.g., brain tumors, osteosarcoma). Patients receiving palliative care only (as their
treatment regimens may differ significantly).
Drugs: Exclude drugs not listed in both the Kenya 2019 Essential Drugs List and the
WHO Pediatric Essential Drugs List. Exclude drugs used off-label or as part of
experimental therapies.
Time Frame: Exclude pharmacy records or patient data older than 12 or 6 months to
ensure relevance and accuracy.
Data Availability: Exclude drugs or patients with incomplete records (e.g., missing stock
levels, unclear dispensation data).
Data Collection:
Quantitative: Extraction of stock-out data, drug prices, and treatment outcomes from MTRH’s
electronic health records and pharmacy databases.
Qualitative: Conducting interviews with 15–20 stakeholders using a purposive sampling
approach.
Data Analysis:
Quantitative: Descriptive statistics to summarize stock-out frequency and duration. Cost-
effectiveness analysis using ICER per QALY.
Qualitative: Thematic analysis to identify key determinants of drug availability and affordability.
Expected Outcomes
1. A detailed assessment of stock-out patterns and their impact on treatment outcomes at
MTRH.
2. Cost-effectiveness estimates for key oncology drugs used in childhood cancers.
3. Identification of health system determinants influencing drug availability and
affordability.
Conclusion
This research concept addresses a critical gap in the literature by focusing on stock-outs and
costs of oncology drugs at MTRH. The findings will contribute to evidence-based strategies for
improving access to essential cancer medicines for children in Kenya and beyond.
References
1. Bukachi, S. A., Tuju, J., & Wamae, W. (2021). Access to essential cancer medicines for
children: A comparative mixed-methods analysis of availability, price, and health-system
determinants in East Africa. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06322-6
2. Cherny, N. I., Sullivan, R., Torode, J., Saar, M., & Eniu, A. (2017). ESMO International
Consortium Study on the availability, out-of-pocket costs, and accessibility of
antineoplastic medicines in countries outside of Europe. Annals of Oncology, 28(11),
2633-2647. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx521
3. Goldstein, D. A., Chen, Q., Ayer, T., Howard, D. H., Lipscomb, J., El-Rayes, B. F., & Flowers,
C. R. (2016). Cost-effectiveness analysis of regorafenib for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 34(6), 654-660. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.64.5647
4. World Health Organization. (2019). Shortages and price variability of essential cytotoxic
medicines for treating children with cancers. WHO Technical Report Series, 1021, 1-50.
2. Kariuki, J., & Waiganjo, E. (2017). Determinants of effective drugs inventory management in
public health institutions: A case of Kenyatta National Hospital. International Journal of
Supply Chain and Logistics, 1(1), 1-15.
3. Mwangi, J., & Ngugi, P. (2018). Factors influencing inventory management performance in
public hospitals: A case of Defence Forces Memorial Hospital. Journal of Procurement &
Supply Chain, 2(1), 1-10.
4. Nyaberi, D., & Okibo, W. (2019). Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) as a strategy for
mitigating drug stock-outs in public healthcare facilities in Kenya. International Journal
of Healthcare Management, 12(3), 234-241.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2018.1503867
5. Omondi, L., & Atieno, M. (2020). Impact of drug stock-outs on patient outcomes in rural
Western Kenya: A case study of pediatric oncology care. Journal of Health Systems and
Policy, 8(2), 45-58.