0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views

GPP Evaluation Form

The document outlines the evaluation criteria for the Gulayan sa Paaralan Program for the school year 2024-2025, focusing on educational relevance, community involvement, garden quality, sustainability, and impact on nutritional status. Each criterion is assigned specific points, totaling 100, to assess the effectiveness of school gardens in enhancing learning and community engagement. The evaluation also considers the contribution of the garden to school feeding programs and the nutritional status of students.

Uploaded by

abloyabloy7
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views

GPP Evaluation Form

The document outlines the evaluation criteria for the Gulayan sa Paaralan Program for the school year 2024-2025, focusing on educational relevance, community involvement, garden quality, sustainability, and impact on nutritional status. Each criterion is assigned specific points, totaling 100, to assess the effectiveness of school gardens in enhancing learning and community engagement. The evaluation also considers the contribution of the garden to school feeding programs and the nutritional status of students.

Uploaded by

abloyabloy7
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

1

BEST IMPLEMENTERS ON THE

GULAYAN SA PAARALAN PROGRAM


School:__________ S.Y. 2024 - 2025 Date:_________
CRITERIA POINTS
1. Educational Relevance (25%)
- Use of garden to enhance learning Experience of 5%
students (Students involvement) (Adoption of
technology by students in the garden)
- Use as laboratory to teach basic concept of Science 5%
and Agriculture (Integration on lesson plan)
- Number of Students who visited the garden 5%
- Signage / Placards (Names of Plants and Uses) 5%
- Use of school garden by teachers for learning 5%
opportunities
2. Community Involvement (10%)
- Partnership with barangay, socio-civic group 2.5%
- Barangay Official / socio – civic groups involved 2.5%
- Community attitude and links to the school gardens 5%
3. Garden Quality (30%)
- Qualities that make the garden unique (Layout design 5%
of the garden and use of plants)
- Crops planted at least 5 kinds based on 3 food groups 5%
(GO, GROW,GLOW)
- Care and maintenance of the garden 5%
- Organically grown 5%
Creativity 5%
- Innovativeness ( vermiculture, hydrophonics, 5%
concoction, etc.)
4. Sustainability of the garden (25%)
- Sustainability, eco-friendly, considering the 3R’s 10%
principle of reduce, reuse, recycle
- Adoption of seed production technology 5%
- Successful demonstration of school garden 10%
sustainability and potential for longevity/voluntary
involvement of Parent/Teacher to provide succeeding
plant materials and labor for the project
5. Impact on Nutritional Status of School (10%)
- % Contribution to school feeding (cost of vegetable
donated to feeding) (5%)
- 85-100% contribution/utilization 5%
- 50-84% contribution/utilization 3%
- 1-49% contribution/utilization 2%
- Reduction in the number of severely wasted and
wasted learners (5%)
- 85-100% reduction of SW and W learners 5%
- 50-84% reduction of SW and W learners 3%
- 1-49% reduction of SW and W learners 2%
- TOTAL 100%

____________________________________
Name and Signature of Evaluator
2

You might also like