Notes Ma105
Notes Ma105
Continuous feedback
Goal-setting
Development planning
Performance evaluation
‣ Organizational Alignment
‣ Employee Development
‣ Performance Evaluation
‣ Continuous Feedback
‣ Adaptability
‣ Employee Engagement
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
REWARD SYSTEMS
5. WORKFORCE PLANNING
Europe
Africa
Latin America
Economic Shift
Demographics
Legal Framework
AIMS
1. Goal Setting
2. Setting Expectations
3. Improved Communication
ROLES
Or also
RAISING CAPITAL
STAGES OF PM SYSTEMS
1. Productivity
2. Quality of Work
3. Initiative
4. Teamwork
5. Problem-Solving
PERFORMANCE REVIEW
Key Components
Impact:
Practices
PERFORMANCE RENEWAL
Self-Assessment
Supervisor/Manager Evaluation
Peer Reviews (360-Degree Feedback)
Client/Customer Feedback
Objective Metrics
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
Achievements
Areas for Improvement
Development Plan
Documentation
Goal Setting
RENEWAL DISCUSSION
RECONTRACTING
Compensation
Clarifying roles, responsibilities
Contract Duration
Benefits
Confidentiality Agreements
CONTRACT FINALIZATION
Legal Review
Agreement and Signing
REWARD SYSTEMS
A MONETARY NON-MONETARY
There are two main types of reward systems: monetary and non-
monetary. Monetary rewards include salaries and bonuses, while non-
monetary rewards can involve recognition, career development, and
work-life balance. Both types play a crucial role in employee engagement
VIDEO
When employees understand the essence of their roles, they can focus
their energy and talents on tasks that truly matter contributing to the
collective success.
Key components
2 facets of feedback
ACTION PLAN
•Outlining clear deadlines for improvement
•Follow up on expectations and deadlines
•Consequence of poor performance is enforced.
1. Quantity of output
2. Quality of output
3. Timeliness of output
4. Presence and attendance on the job
5. Efficiency of work completed
6. Effectiveness of work completed
Performance measures
1. Informal Approach
a. Conducts whenever necessary
b. Day-to-day evaluation of performance
c. Various conversations on the job or on-the-spot
discussions of specific occurrences
d. It should not replace a formal performance appraisal
e. Frequent informal feedback to employees can prevent
surprises
2. Systematic appraisal
Systematic appraisals feature a regular time interval which
distinguishes them from Informal appraisals both employees and
managers know that performance will be reviewed on a regular
basis and they can plan for performance discussions.
Possible drawbacks:
The critical incident method the manager keeps a written record of both
favorable and unfavorable Actions performed by an employee during the
entire rating period when a critical incident involving an employee occurs,
the manager writes it down
The recency effect occurs when a Raider gives greater weight to recent
events when appraising in the individuals performance.
The primary effect which occurs when a Raider gives greater weight to
information received first when appraising an individual's performance
Central tendency errors occurs when the Raider gives all employees a
score with a narrow range in the middle of the scale.
Leniency error occurs when ratings of all employees fall at the high end
of the scale
Strictness error occurs when a manager uses only the lower end of the
scale to rate employees
Rater Bias when a raters values or prejudice distort the rating rate or bias
occurs such bias may be unconscious or quite intentional
The halo effect occurs when a Raider scores an employee high and all job
criteria because of performance in one area of assigned work
Responsibilities. For example if a worker has few absences the supervisor
might give the worker a high rating in all other areas of work including
quantity and quality of output Without really thinking about the
employees other characteristics separately
The opposite is the horns effect which occurs when a low rating in one
characteristic leads to a low overall rating.
If the rater has seen only a small sample of a person's work an appraisal
may be subject to the sampling error.