BPJ_2013
BPJ_2013
net/publication/236154660
CITATIONS READS
9 1,252
3 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Regupathi Iyyaswami on 01 June 2014.
Introduction
Abstract The challenges which the biotechnology industry faces today are ever
T
he objective of this study more demanding. In the case of therapeutic protein production for human
was to o ptimize process use, extremely high purity standards of 99.9% or higher are required.
conditions for the effective Proteins must be separated from a very large number of production con-
partitioning of bovine serum taminants such as host cell proteins, nucleic acids, and polysaccharides
albumin (BSA) using response surface present in the cell culture or cell lysate. Separation techniques used for
methodology (RSM). Initially, four downstream purification should be relatively simple, provide high reso-
different salts (tripotassium c itrate, lution, speed, ease of scale-up, and if needed, operated continuously. In
tripotassium phosphate, sodium this regard, aqueous two-phase systems (ATPS) are gaining in importance
carbonate, and sodium sulphate) were and researchers are focusing in this area to develop more environmentally
tested for the ability to partition BSA. friendly and economical systems to optimize product recovery.
Among the salts chosen, tripotassium ATPS are formed when two mutually incompatible polymers, or a polymer
citrate was observed to yield a high and salt, are mixed above a critical concentration.[1] Mixtures of proteins
partition coefficient. added to this ATPS tend to partition unequally between the phases, thus
The effect of phase forming com- allowing for the extraction of a particular protein. Several researchers were
ponents: concentration, PEG molecu- employed to study the purification characteristics of proteins using bovine
lar weight, and pH were studied for a serum albumin as a model protein through ATPS. Alves et al.[2] used poly-
PEG/tripotassium citrate system and ethylene glycol (PEG)/maltodextrin (MD) ATPS for the partitioning of BSA
the information obtained was utilized where BSA prefers the MD-rich phase over the PEG-rich phase. However, they
to fix the ranges in RSM studies. Four did not assess the pH and salt concentration effect on protein partitioning.
different independent variables (PEG Conversely, the partitioning characteristics of the ATPS were dependant
2000, tripotassium citrate, NaCl con- on many operating variables like pH, salt/PEG concentration, addition of
centrations, and pH) were considered neutral salt (sodium chloride [NaCl]) and their concentration, tie line length
for RSM studies and the responses (TLL), temperature, etc. The effects of these parameters on the partitioning
generated were partition coefficient coefficients of a variety of proteins for different ATPS have been reporteded
(k) and percentage yield. A statistical in literature in recent years.
model was developed and the values Haghtalab et al.[3] investigated the partitioning of lysozyme, BSA, and
obtained were 99% within the confi- α-amylase in ATPS of PEG/dipotassium hydrogen phosphate (K 2HPO4)/water
dence level. Optimal conditions of the (H2O) and PEG/sodium sulphate (Na2SO4)/H2O at 298.15 K. They found that
system were found as: 0.25 M sodium pH and salt concentration also affected protein partitioning. Capezio et al.[4]
chloride, 32% PEG 2000 (w/w), 16% analysed the influence of PEG molecular mass, pH, and NaCl concentration
tripotassium citrate (w/w), pH 6.0, a on the partitioning of bovine whey proteins (BSA, α-lactalbumin [α-LA] and
partition coefficient of 6.03, a recovery β-lactoglobulin [β-LG]) and α-1 antitrypsin [α1AT] using PEG (1000, 1500,
of 91.76%, and a controlled operating 3350)/potassium phosphate (K 3PO 4). BSA and α-LA concentrated in the
temperature of 303.15 K. PEG-rich phase, while β-LG and α1AT showed affinity for the phosphate-rich
phase. They also found that an increase in the medium’s pH induced the
Systems a0 a1 a2 R2
PEG 4000/Sodium Sulphate 1.3325 0.1509 0.1578 0.9968
PEG 4000/Sodium Carbonate 1.3325 0.1409 0.1827 0.9992
PEG 4000/Dipotassium Hydrogen Phosphate 1.3325 0.1106 0.1392 0.9944
PEG 2000/Sodium Citrate/Water 1.3325 0.1314 0.2430 0.9949
PEG 3000/Potassium Citrate/Water 1.3325 0.1416 0.2290 0.9901
PEG 4000/Potassium Citrate/Water 1.3325 0.1079 0.1596 0.9955
PEG 6000/Potassium Citrate/Water 1.3325 0.1383 0.1227 0.9970
R : regression coefficient
2
Systems a0 a1 a2 b1 b2 AARD %
PEG 4000/Sodium Sulphate 1965.903 0.5116 -0.1599 0.9968 0.4611 1.9286
PEG 4000/Sodium Carbonate 500.3408 0.0484 -0.0499 0.9992 2.0199 1.0072
PEG 4000/Dipotassium Hydrogen Phosphate 1296.198 3.4429 23.227 0.9944 2.7122 2.5921
PEG 2000/Sodium Citrate/Water 1056.873 0.6702 0.1511 0.9949 0.5873 4.0862
PEG 3000/Potassium Citrate/Water 425.0001 0.1048 0.0303 0.9901 0.1239 1.6408
PEG 4000/Potassium Citrate/Water 1036.741 0.2164 0.2736 0.9955 0.9497 1.5434
PEG 6000/Potassium Citrate/Water 215.2484 0.1096 0.4005 0.9970 0.9664 1.9361
AARD %: average arithmetic relative deviation (AARD) = (Σ| (Exptl – Cal)/ (Exptl)|)/ (N) x 100.
Levels
Factors Variables
-2 -1 0 +1 +2
PEG % (w/w) 1965.903 24 28 32 36 40
Tripotassium Citrate % (w/w) 500.3408 12 14 16 18 20
pH 1296.198 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0
Salt Molality 1056.873 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.45
Salts
When the anion and cation of a salt have
different relative affinities for different phase-
forming polymers, and consequently for each
phase, the requirement of electro-neutrality in
each phase results in a Donnan-type electro-
static potential difference between the phases.
This potential difference appears to have large
effects on partitioning of charged solutes (such
as proteins). Therefore, the choice of salt is an
easy way to influence the target biomolecule
partitioning. The most hydrophobic anions
or cations will drive the partitioning of their
counter-ions to the most hydrophobic phase.
Co-ions, which are less hydrophobic, will parti-
tion to the hydrophilic phase. FIGURE 1. Variation of partition coefficient k against PEG concentration for
different salts (8 % salt concentration) at a temperature of 303.15 K: K 2HPO4;
The variation of partition coefficient k K 3C6H5O7; Na2CO3; 0 Na2SO 4.
against PEG 2000 concentration for different
salts (sodium sulphate, sodium carbonate,
dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, and tripo-
tassium citrate) with a salt concentration of
8% (w/w) at 303.15 K is shown in Figure 1. BSA,
being hydrophilic in nature, was observed to
be attracted to the bottom phase, in the case
of sodium carbonate and sodium sulphate, due
to the lessened hydrophobicity of the salt-rich
phase. Since the phosphate salt phase is more
hydrophobic than the polymer phase, water
molecules were expelled to the top phase,
resulting in increased partitioning of BSA to
that phase. Citrate also has similar properties
to phosphate in the PEG/phosphate system.[19]
The PEG/citrate system extracted the highest
amount of BSA to the top phase suggesting
that the extraction of BSA in ATPS was influ-
enced by hydrophobicity. Increasing the dif- FIGURE 2. Partition coefficient k against PEG concentration for different
ference in hydrophobicity between the phases molecular weights of PEG with an 8 % C6H5K 3O7 concentration at 303.15 K:
would increase the strength of hydrophobic PEG 2000; 0 PEG 3000; * PEG 4000; PEG 6000.
Tie Line
At equilibrium, the composition of phases
along the TLL are especially important in the
contest of the partitioning study. To obtain the
equilibrium phase composition at a known feed
composition of PEG and salt, the Othmer-Tobias
(Equation 8) and Bancroft (Equation 9) relation-
ships were used and the equilibrium studies were
made for the current ATPS (with the presence of
BSA). The two-phase systems were formed at
several compositions of tripotassium citrate and
PEG 2000 by mixing the individual stock solu-
tions and allowing them to reach equilibrium. A
number of tie lines were created, and the feed
FIGURE 7. Phase diagram of PEG 2000/tripotassium citrate ATPS without compositions, along with equilibrium composi-
BSA at 303.15 K: , PEG 2000/tripotassium citrate ATPS with BSA at 303.15 K;
tion of the individual phases (Figure 7) with TLL
tie line; ---- tie line predicted by Equations 8 and 9.
are reported in Table 4. The reliability of tie line
compositions was ascertained by Equations 8
have been observed at different pH values where the BSA partition and 9).[14, 15] The regression coefficient found for
is determined by its hydrophobic nature. It appears likely that the the present system is 0.988 for Equation 8 and
partition coefficient is totally independent of protein surface charge 0.9702 for Equation 9.
in combination with hydrophobic characteristics. It was confirmed that
bot n
1 – wp = K 1 – ws
top
the PEG, being more hydrophobic in nature, tends to strongly interact
(8)
with the non-polar regions of BSA. Thus, the partition coefficient of wptop wsbot
r
BSA increases beyond 0.15 M NaCl concentrations.[6] ww = K1 ww
bot top
(9)
wsbot wptop
Phase Diagram and Equilibrium of PEG 2000/Tripotassium
Citrate System with BSA at 303.15 K
Should we show your phase diagram?
0.05 mg/mL of BSA. The experimental binodal 0.2400 0.1600 0.5500 0.0228 0.0495 0.2440 0.5472
data and literature binodal data[20] were plotted 0.3000 0.1600 0.6093 0.0174 0.0427 0.2709 0.6207
and compared in Figure 7. With the figure, it 0.3400 0.1600 0.6845 0.0116 0.0384 0.2862 0.7021
was found that the binodal curve was shifting 0.2600 0.2000 0.6964 0.0124 0.0370 0.2949 0.7174
towards the two-phase region when protein
0.3000 0.2000 0.7280 0.0104 0.0385 0.3103 0.7519
was incorporated. The results suggested that
0.3400 0.2000 0.7786 0.0066 0.0330 0.3302 0.8128
the critical concentration of PEG/salt required
Table 5. Experimental central composite rotatable design (CCRD) runs using four independent variables and corresponding results.
A B C
D E F
FIGURE 9. Contour plot for the partition coefficient of BSA in the top phase as a function of: (A) tripotassium citrate and PEG con-
centration; (B) pH and PEG concentration; (C) NaCl and PEG concentration; (D) pH and tripotassium citrate concentration; (E) NaCl
and tripotassium citrate concentration; and (F) NaCl concentration and pH (0 level values of the other variables were considered as
a constant for all figures (i.e., 32 % PEG 2000/16 % tripotassium citrate/0.25 M NaCl, pH 6).
A B C
FIGURE 10. Contour plot for the % recovery of BSA in the top phase as a function of: (A) __% (w/w) PEG/ 16 % (w/w) NaCl molality, pH
6; (b) __% (w/w) PEG 2000/16 % (w/w) tripotassium citrate salt/0.25 M NaCl, pH _; and (c) __% (w/w) PEG 2000/__% (w/w) tripotassium
citrate salt/0.25 M NaCl, pH 6.