Scribd
Upload
3 views

Report Writing _ Final

The report discusses the benefits and challenges of implementing sustainability practices at universities, highlighting advantages like cost savings and improved reputation, while noting obstacles such as funding constraints and resistance to change. It critiques the AI-generated nature of the report, emphasizing the need for human oversight to enhance analysis and provide concrete evidence. Recommendations for improvement include incorporating evidence-based examples and enhancing the specificity of suggestions to make them more actionable.

Uploaded by

Tuan Anh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3 views

Report Writing _ Final

The report discusses the benefits and challenges of implementing sustainability practices at universities, highlighting advantages like cost savings and improved reputation, while noting obstacles such as funding constraints and resistance to change. It critiques the AI-generated nature of the report, emphasizing the need for human oversight to enhance analysis and provide concrete evidence. Recommendations for improvement include incorporating evidence-based examples and enhancing the specificity of suggestions to make them more actionable.

Uploaded by

Tuan Anh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

1.

Introduction

1.1. Summary

The AI-generated report, “The Benefits and Challenges of Implementing


Sustainability Practices at Universities,” highlights key advantages and obstacles faced by
universities in promoting sustainability. Among the benefits are cost savings, enhanced
reputation, improved campus life, and enriched educational opportunities. The challenges
identified include funding constraints, resistance to change, logistical complexities, and
difficulties in measuring impact. The report concludes with general recommendations to
address these challenges.

1.2. Purpose of the critique

AI tools have become increasingly popular, offering numerous advantages in


streamlining tasks and generating content. However, improper usage and lack of critical
evaluation can result in significant errors. For instance, relying solely on AI-generated
responses without refinement can lead to substandard work and poor feedback. Similarly,
submitting an AI-generated report without human review would fail to meet professional
standards. This critique aims to evaluate the report’s strengths and weaknesses in terms of its
structure, content, and language while offering suggestions for improvement. The analysis
underscores the necessity of human oversight in refining AI-generated content to ensure
quality and relevance.

2. Strengths

2.1. Structure

As Michelle Reid emphasizes in Report Writing (2018), a well-structured report helps


readers navigate and locate information effectively. This AI-generated report exhibits strong
organization, dividing its content into distinct sections—benefits, challenges, and
recommendations—which facilitates readability and coherence. The logical flow of ideas
ensures clarity, helping readers engage with the content more effectively.

2.2. Language and tone


The report’s language is concise and professional, making it easy to follow. Its
vocabulary is suitable for an academic context, avoiding overly casual expressions and
excessive technical jargon. Additionally, the tone is neutral and objective, which is vital for
addressing a multifaceted topic like sustainability. By maintaining impartiality, the report
enhances its credibility and appeals to a diverse audience. The consistency in tone further
strengthens the report’s cohesiveness and readability.

3. Weaknesses

3.1. Lack of analysis

Despite these strengths, the report has notable weaknesses. One significant issue is its
lack of critical analysis. For example, in the section on cost savings, the report mentions
energy-efficient buildings and renewable energy sources but fails to provide specific
examples or financial data to substantiate these claims. This omission results in superficial
arguments, which may fail to engage readers seeking deeper insights.

3.2. Absence of evidence

The absence of concrete evidence is another major drawback. While the report
discusses benefits like cost savings and enhanced reputation, it lacks real-world examples,
case studies, or quantitative data to support these points. For instance, including a case study
such as Monash University’s Net Zero Initiative could provide tangible evidence, showcasing
both the benefits and challenges of sustainability practices. Without adequate evidence, the
report’s arguments appear unsubstantiated and less credible.

4. Suggestions for improvement

4.1. Incorporate evidence-based examples

Another crucial recommendation for improving the report is tailoring its language and
tone to the intended audience. For example, if the readership includes individuals with
limited expertise in sustainability, the report should provide brief explanations of technical
terms to enhance accessibility. Simplifying complex concepts and avoiding overly academic
language would help ensure the report effectively communicates its message to a wider
audience.

1
Figure 2. Monash University’s Net Zero Initiative

4.2. Enhance recommendations

The recommendations section is another area requiring improvement. The suggestions


are broad and lack specificity, making them less actionable. For example, rather than merely
proposing “promote collaboration,” the report could suggest practical steps such as forming
partnerships with local governments or nonprofit organizations. Similarly, the
recommendation to “develop clear metrics” should include concrete goals, such as adopting
S.M.A.R.T criteria. For instance, the report could specify a goal like “reduce campus energy
consumption by 20% within five years of implementation.” These additions would make the
recommendations more practical and effective.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, while AI-generated reports offer valuable support in professional


writing, they still have limitations, particularly in delivering depth, evidence, and contextual
relevance. Leveraging AI tools effectively—such as by using precise prompts—can enhance
their utility. However, human oversight remains irreplaceable. Human writers are essential for
refining AI-generated content, tailoring it to specific audiences, and providing nuanced
insights drawn from expertise and experience. The collaboration between AI and human
input is key to producing high-quality, professional reports that meet both academic and
practical standards.

2
References

1. Reid, M. (2018). Report writing. Springer Nature Limited.


2. Huron University Canada. How to write a report. Retrieved from
https://huronu.ca/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/HOW%20TO%20WRITE%20A%20REP
ORT.pdf
3. Monash University. Net zero initiative. Retrieved from
https://www.monash.edu/net-zero-initiative

You might also like