Scribd
Upload
7 views

Communicating Project Impact Using the Intersectionality Lens Applying Cochran’s Formula for Sampling

The document discusses the importance of using an intersectionality lens to communicate project impact, emphasizing that different groups experience change differently. It introduces Cochran’s formula as a robust sampling method to ensure diverse representation in data collection, allowing for accurate disaggregation of impact. By visualizing data and tailoring recommendations based on intersectional insights, programs can improve inclusivity and decision-making.

Uploaded by

aamina01
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
7 views

Communicating Project Impact Using the Intersectionality Lens Applying Cochran’s Formula for Sampling

The document discusses the importance of using an intersectionality lens to communicate project impact, emphasizing that different groups experience change differently. It introduces Cochran’s formula as a robust sampling method to ensure diverse representation in data collection, allowing for accurate disaggregation of impact. By visualizing data and tailoring recommendations based on intersectional insights, programs can improve inclusivity and decision-making.

Uploaded by

aamina01
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Communicating Project Impact Using the

Intersectionality Lens: Applying Cochran’s


Formula for Sampling

Compiled by: Byrone Buyu Wayodi

Introduction
When measuring project impact, it is crucial to go beyond surface-level
reporting and truly understand how different groups experience change.
Intersectionality helps uncover who benefits the most, who is left behind,
and why. To achieve this, effective sampling methods, such as Cochran’s
formula, ensure statistical reliability while capturing diverse perspectives.

This article explores how to communicate project impact using the


intersectionality lens while applying Cochran’s formula for sampling.
1️. Why Intersectionality Matters in Communicating
Project Impact
Intersectionality recognizes that people experience interventions
differently based on gender, age, disability, ethnicity, location, and other
socio-economic factors.

Example: A rural financial literacy program may show a 60%


overall improvement in savings behavior, but disaggregated data might
reveal that:

• 80% of urban women improved, while only 30% of rural women


did.
• Men benefited more because they had easier access to financial
services.
• Women with disabilities faced barriers in accessing training
centers.

Key takeaway: Overall statistics can be misleading—intersectional


analysis reveals real inequalities in impact.
2️. Cochran’s Formula: A Robust Sampling Method for
Intersectional Analysis
What is Cochran’s Formula?

Cochran’s formula helps determine the minimum sample size needed for
accurate data collection. It is particularly useful for large and diverse
populations where disaggregation is necessary.
3️. Applying Cochran’s Formula to Intersectional Sampling
Using Cochran’s formula, we can ensure that all relevant groups are
represented in our sample.

How to Apply It to Intersectionality:

Step 1: Define Key Population Groups


Identify sub-groups based on gender, location, age, disability, income
level, etc.

Step 2: Use Stratified Sampling


Once the total sample size (n) is determined, divide it among sub-groups
proportionally.

Example: Disaggregating a Sample of 384 Respondents

Group % in Population Sample Size (n)


Rural Men 30% 115
Rural Women 25% 96
Urban Men 20% 77
Urban Women 15% 58
People with Disabilities 10% 38

This ensures balanced representation, preventing data bias towards


one dominant group.
4️. Communicating Impact Using Intersectionality
& Cochran’s Formula
A. Show Data Disaggregation
Instead of just reporting general impact, show differences across groups.

Example: Instead of stating,


"60% of participants improved financial literacy,"
present the full intersectional breakdown:

Financial Literacy Improvement by Group:

• Urban Men: 75%


• Urban Women: 68%
• Rural Men: 55%
• Rural Women: 45%
• People with Disabilities: 30%

Key takeaway: By showing who benefits more and who struggles,


programs can adjust strategies to ensure inclusivity.
B. Visualize Data for Impactful Communication
Use heatmaps, bar charts, and dashboards to showcase differences across
participant groups.

Example Dashboard Snapshot:

Before Intervention: Low savings adoption among women with


disabilities.
After Intervention: 20% increase, but still lower than other groups.

This visualization helps decision-makers see where more effort is


needed.

C. Strengthen Recommendations Based on Intersectional


Insights
Example: If rural women have low participation in financial literacy
programs, then:
Conduct mobile-based financial education for rural women.
Provide childcare options during training sessions.
Partner with local women’s groups for better outreach.
5️. Conclusion: Using Intersectionality &
Sampling to Improve Decision-Making
Cochran’s formula ensures representative samples, making
evaluation findings statistically valid.
Intersectionality deepens insights, ensuring no one is left behind in
impact measurement.
Data disaggregation leads to better program design, tailored
interventions, and inclusive growth.

You might also like