Annexure 7.

1 – Water supply
Demand Estimation and
hydraulic Calculations
Annexure 7.2 – VIWSCO
Water Allocation Letter
Annexure 7.3 - Pipeline
Crossing SH, NH & SCR line
Drawings Submitted to
Stakeholders
 ANNEXURE 7.1
WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS
&
HYDRAULIC DESIGN SHEETS
 WATER DEMAND - NAKKAPALLI CLUSTER START UP AREA

Unit Water Water

Area
S.No Type of Industry Demand required Wastewater Quantity (KLD) Water Quantity (MLD)
(Acres)
(KL/Acre/day) (KLD)

Saleable Area HTDS LTDS process CT sewage Toxic ManPower Process Cooling Garden
I
1.00 Pharmaceutical Industries 59.50 15.00 892.50 223.13 223.13 42.36 34.27 0.00 42.84 595.00 211.82 42.84
2.00 Industrial and Consumer Electronics 63.15 6.00 378.91 0.00 36.38 39.41 48.50 24.25 60.63 75.78 197.03 45.47
3.00 Auto and Auto components 69.83 6.00 418.99 0.00 40.22 43.58 53.63 26.82 67.04 83.80 217.88 50.28
4.00 Aerospace and defence 75.25 6.00 451.50 0.00 43.34 46.96 57.79 28.90 72.24 90.30 234.78 54.18
5.00 Engineering 122.59 6.00 735.53 0.00 70.61 76.50 94.15 47.07 117.68 147.11 382.48 88.26
6.00 Building Materials Industry/Non Metallic minerals 85.25 5.00 426.24 0.00 175.82 5.63 81.84 0.00 102.30 234.43 28.13 61.38
7.00 MSME (includes Leather, Plastics, wood etc.,) 26.20 4.00 104.80 0.00 11.53 4.24 40.24 0.00 50.30 14.41 21.22 18.86
8.00 Food and Agro Processing Industry 14.62 10.00 146.22 0.00 81.88 2.46 16.84 0.00 21.06 102.35 12.28 10.53
9.00 Apparels and Textile Industry 55.31 4.00 221.24 0.00 24.34 8.96 84.96 0.00 106.19 30.42 44.80 39.82
10.00 Logistics 26.00 3.50 91.00 0.00 10.40 8.11 14.98 0.00 18.72 13.00 40.56 18.72
11.00 Supporting Facilities (Saleable) 5.00 3.50 17.50 0.00 2.00 1.56 2.88 0.00 3.60 2.50 7.80 3.60
12.00 Utilities+ Commercial+OWS 76.70 2.00 153.40 0.00 0.00 8.59 44.18 0.00 55.22 0.00 42.95 55.22
Sub Total (I) 679.40 4037.82 223.13 719.65 288.35 574.26 127.04 717.82 1389.10 1441.73 489.17
II Infrastructure (Roads, Substation, WTP, CETP etc.,) 0.80 0.77 0.20
13.00 Residential/Social Infrastructure 4.00 10.65 42.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.24 0.00
14.00 Settlements, Burial Ground 28.60 5.00 143.00 105.25
15.00 Green Area 173.90 4.00 695.60
16.00 SST 27.00 Note (Assumptions)
17.00 Roads + Railway Corridor 168.20 1. For Industrial area 4.0-15.0 KL/acre/day
18.00 Revenue Water bodies 38.90 2. For Logistic hub and Supporting Facilities area 3.5 KL/acre/day
3. Residential density in Residential Area - 100 Persons per Acre (Industries formulated guid
Sub Total (III) 440.60 4. Employment density - 15 Employees per Acre (Dholere TP2E SIR & SJ Report)
TOTAL 1120.00 5. Floating pop assumed at 20% of Employees
Fire Fighting Water Demand 460.50 6. Demand for Residential 135 lpcd
Total Water Demand without Losses 5379.51 7. Demand for Employees 45 lpcd
TOTAL WATER DEMAND with 15% LOSSES IN KLD 6328.84 8. Demand for Floating 15 lpcd
GRAND TOTAL 6.50 6.33 9. Firefighting demand - 100 * Sqrt(P); P in thousands
MLD 10. For Green area & Open Spaces 5.0 KL/acre/day
11. Industrial wastewater generation accrding Sector and Activities Proposed
12. Domestic wastewater generation @ 80%
 Intake at SST calculations

DATA

Ultimate, Q = 6.50 MLD

Min Detention time = 5.00 min

Bed Level = 8.50 M. LVL

Hydraulic Particulars
Top Bund Level / TBL =+ 19.50 M. LVL

At SST GL =+ 6.50 M. LVL

Free board above MWL of canal = 1.00 m

Pump house floor level 19.5+1+0.2 = + 20.70 M. LVL

Internal Diameter of the Well = 6.00 m

Capacity of Collection Well 6.5/23.5/60*5*1000 = 23.55 Cum

Depth required 23.551*4/(PI()*6^2) = 0.83 m

Depth provided = 1.00 m

SAFE

DEPTH /HEIGHT CALCULATIONS

Assumed LWL in SST = 9.50 M. LVL
LWL in Intake well 9.5-1 = 8.50 M. LVL
Assumed internal dia of suction pipe = 0.30 m
Min depth in between LWL and top lvl of base slab = 1.00 m
(as per page no 412 of WS manual 1999)

Base slab top Level 8.5-1 = 7.50 M. LVL

Depth in between Bed level

8.5-(7.5) = 1.00 m
and top of base slab

Height of TBL above bed level 19.5-(8.5) = 11.00 m

 Intake at SST calculations

Height of the cover slab of Sump cum pump house as Floor of

Raw Water Pump chamber from TBL

20.7-19.5 = 1.20 m

Thickness of floor slab of pump house = 0.20 m

Height upto bottom of corbel above Pump floor level = 3.5 m

Height in between top of corbel to bottom of roof beam/slab = 1.5 m

Height of Raw Water Pump

3.5+1.5 = 5.0 m
Chamber above its floor level

Thickness of roof slab of Raw Water Pump Chamber = 0.15 m

Top level of roof beam of

20.7+5+0.15 =+ 25.85 M. LVL
pump house

Hence Total Vertical length of

Collecting Well-cum-Raw 1+11+1.2+0.2+5+0.15-0.2 = 18.35 m
Water Pump Chamber
 Economic sizing - Rising main

1) ECONOMIC SIZE OF RISING MAIN

COMPARISON OF CAPITALISED COST OF PIPES FOR PUMPING REACH FROM SST TO WTP

PROJECT: NAKKAPALLI INDUSTRIAL PARK STRETCH: SST TO WTP

Nature of Fluid: Raw water
==========================================================================================================================
WATER REQUIREMENT: PIPE
BASE YEAR (2020): 6.50 MLD
INTERMEDIATE YEAR (2035): 6.50 MLD
ULTIMATE YEAR(2050): 6.50 MLD

2) Max pumping level 20.70 m

DATA
3) Suction level 10.00 m
DIA TYPE CLASS HWC RATE (Rs/m)
4) Length of Pumping Main 550.00 m
250 DI K9 140 2265.00
5) Static Head for Pump 10.70 m
300 DI K9 140 2898.00
6) Design period 30 years 3685.00
350 DI K9 140
7) Combined Efficiency of pump 75 % 400 DI K9 140 4443.00
8) Cost of Pumping unit 30000 Rs/Kw 450 DI K9 140 5316.00
9) Interest Rate 12.5 % 500 DI K9 140 6185.00
10) Life of Elec Motor and Pumps 15 yrs
11) Energy Charges 600 paise/unit
12) Pumping Hours 23 Hrs
13) Residual Head 2.00 mtrs
==========================================================================================================================
SOLUTION: First Fifteen Years Second Fifteen Years

1) Discharge at installation 6.50 MLD 6.50 MLD

2) Discharge at the end of 15 years 6.50 MLD 6.50 MLD
3) Average Discharge 6.50 MLD 6.50 MLD
4) Average Hours of pumping average discharge 23.00 hrs 23.00 hrs
5) Average Discharge in Cumecs 0.079 m3/sec 0.079 m3/sec
6) Kw required at the above 1.03 *H1 1.03 *H2
7) Annual cost (Rs.) of electrical Energy 50370 * Kw1 50370 * Kw2
 Economic sizing - Rising main

==========================================================================================================================

TABLE - 1: STRETCH: SST TO WTP

FIRST STAGE SECOND STAGE
Frictional
Pipe Size, Frictional Velocity Loss in Other Total Frictional Loss Other Total
S. No mm Head loss per 1000 m m/s Pipeline losses Head in Pipeline losses Head
First Second First Second
Stage Stage Stage Stage
Flow Flow Flow Flow m m m m m m
1 250 8.70 8.70 1.60 1.60 4.78 0.72 18.20 4.78 0.72 18.20
2 300 3.58 3.58 1.11 1.11 1.97 0.30 14.96 1.97 0.30 14.96
3 350 1.69 1.69 0.82 0.82 0.93 0.14 13.77 0.93 0.14 13.77
4 400 0.88 0.88 0.62 0.62 0.48 0.07 13.26 0.48 0.07 13.26
5 450 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.27 0.04 13.01 0.27 0.04 13.01
6 500 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.40 0.16 0.02 12.89 0.16 0.02 12.89
7 600 0.12 0.12 0.28 0.28 0.07 0.01 12.78 0.07 0.01 12.78
8 700 0.06 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.00 12.74 0.03 0.00 12.74
9 800 0.03 0.03 0.16 0.16 0.02 0.00 12.72 0.02 0.00 12.72
10 900 0.02 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.00 12.71 0.01 0.00 12.71
==========================================================================================================================

TABLE - 2: STRETCH: SST TO WTP

KILOWATTS, COST OF PUMP SETS REQUIRED FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES AND PIPE COST
First Stage of Flow Second Stage of Flow
Cost of
Pump Cost Cost of
Pipe Size Class Total Kw req'd Total Kw req'd Pump Cost @ Pipe
S. No @ Rs 30000 Class pipeline in
(mm) of Pipe Head in Plus 50% Head in Plus 50% Rs 30000 per Unit
per KW in of Pipe THS (Rs.)
meters Stand By meters Stand By per KW in THS Length
THS
1 250 DI 18.20 28.03 840.95 DI 18.20 28.03 840.95 2265 1245.75
2 300 DI 14.96 23.05 691.39 DI 14.96 23.05 691.39 2898 1593.90
3 350 DI 13.77 21.21 636.18 DI 13.77 21.21 636.18 3685 2026.75
4 400 DI 13.26 20.42 612.58 DI 13.26 20.42 612.58 4443 2443.65
5 450 DI 13.01 20.04 601.34 DI 13.01 20.04 601.34 5316 2923.80
6 500 DI 12.89 19.85 595.51 DI 12.89 19.85 595.51 6185 3401.75
7 600 DI 12.78 19.68 590.40 DI 12.78 19.68 590.40 8157 4486.35
8 700 DI 12.74 19.62 588.51 DI 12.74 19.62 588.51 10434 5738.70
9 800 DI 12.72 19.59 587.70 DI 12.72 19.59 587.70 12373 6805.15
10 900 DI 12.71 19.58 587.32 DI 12.71 19.58 587.32 15171 8344.05
 Economic sizing - Rising main

==========================================================================================================================

TABLE - 3: STRETCH: SST TO WTP

COMPARITIVE STATEMENT OF OVERALL STRUCTURE OF PUMPING MAIN FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES
First Stage Flow Second Stage Flow
Initial Grand Total
Pipe
Annual Capitalized Capitalized Annual Capitalized Investments of Capitalized Diameter
S. No Cost of Cost of cost for 30 Pipe Material
Energy Energy Total Cost Energy Energy or pump and in
Pump Sets Pump Sets years in THS
Cost in THS in THS Cost in THS Annual (mm)
in THS in THS (Rs)
in THS (Rs) (Rs) in THS (Rs) Energy Cost
in THS (Rs)
1 840.95 705.98 4682.66 5523.61 840.95 705.98 4682.66 943.92 7713.28 250 DI
2 691.39 580.42 3849.89 4541.28 691.39 580.42 3849.89 776.05 6911.23 300 DI
3 636.18 534.07 3542.45 4178.63 636.18 534.07 3542.45 714.08 6919.46 350 DI
4 612.58 514.26 3411.04 4023.62 612.58 514.26 3411.04 687.59 7154.86 400 DI
5 601.34 504.82 3348.43 3949.77 601.34 504.82 3348.43 674.97 7548.54 450 DI
6 595.51 499.93 3315.99 3911.50 595.51 499.93 3315.99 668.43 7981.68 500 DI
7 590.40 495.64 3287.52 3877.92 590.40 495.64 3287.52 662.69 9026.96 600 DI
8 588.51 494.05 3277.01 3865.52 588.51 494.05 3277.01 660.57 10264.79 700 DI
9 587.70 493.38 3272.52 3860.22 587.70 493.38 3272.52 659.67 11325.04 800 DI
10 587.32 493.05 3270.38 3857.70 587.32 493.05 3270.38 659.23 12860.98 900 DI
==============================================================================================
CONCLUSION:
Diameter for this stretch of pipeline with least cost is 300 mm dia DI K9
As per Optimal Velocity, adopted Pipe size is 300 mm dia DI K9
==============================================================================================
 DESIGN OF PUMPING MAIN FROM SST to RWS

COMPUTATION OF FRICTION LOSSES

Pumping from Location Pumping to Location

Strech No. 1
SST RWS

Discharge = Q 6.50 MLD 270.833 cum/hr

Discharge in 23.0 hours = Q 6.78 MLD 282.609 cum/hr

Diameter of the pipe = d 300 mm

Hazen williams coefficient = C 140 ( As per CPHEEO manual Table

6.1) Length of pipe line =L 550 m

Hazen-Williams Formula:

Q = 1.292 x 10-5 x C x d2.63 x S0.54

Q = Discharge in cubic metre per hour

d = Diameter of the pipe in mm

v = Velocity in m/s

S = Slope of hydraulic gradeline and

C = Hazen-Williams coefficient

Hydraulic gradient (s)= 0.003578

slope(i)= 1 in 279 m

Friction Loss(hf) = 1.968 m

Head loss in pipe line = 1.968

Other losses@15%= 0.30 m

Add Residual pressure head at

delivery point = 2.00 m

Total loss in pipe line = 2.26 m

RL of Target Location = 20.70 m

HGL = 24.96 m

Suction Level= 10.00 m

Static Head= 10.70 m

Operating Head= 14.96 m

Velocity Calculations:

Discharge (Q)= 0.079 Cum/Sec

Area of the pipe (A)= 0.071 m2

 Velocity in the pipe(V)= 1.11 m/s

Clear Water Sump Capacity near WTP

Daily Water Requirement including losses = 6.50 MLD

Detention Period = 2.00 Hours
Storage Capacity Required in KL = 541.67 KL
Say 600.00 KL
500 cum
Consider depth 4 M
Dia
 DETAILS OF RAW Water Collection Sump
STORAGE
WATER WATER WATER CAPACITY AVG. FINISHED FREE TOP LEVEL
PUMPING (%)/HOURS CAPACITY DEPTH OF DIAMETER OF LWL FSL
STRUCTURE DEMAND demand for DEMAND CONSIDERED GROUND Bed LEVEL BOARD OF TANK
HOURS RETENTION (KL) TANK (M) TANK (M) (M) (M)
(MLD) 23hours (KLD) (KL) LEVEL (M) (M) (M) (M)
PERIOD
CWS 1 at WTP 6.50 6.78 6782.61 23.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 4.50 10.00 13.00 13.50 14.00 18.50 0.50 19.00
 Pumping Machinery Design

Pumping Machinery Design

Vertical Turbine Pumpsets
Pump reach : AT SST INTAKE

Suction level at = 10.00 m

RL of Target location at = 20.70 m

Design Discharge = 6.50 MLD

Design Pumping Hours = 23.0 hrs
Duty of Pump = 78.51 lps

Static Head Calculations

Static lift = 10.70 m

Residual Head at end = 2.00 m

Friction Head Calculations

Intake to SST Premises
Pipe size = 300 mm
Pipe Length = 550.00 m
HWC for Pipe = 140
Velocity of flow = 1.11 m/s
Friction Head = 1.97 m
Other Losses (15 % of friction head) 0.30 m
Total pumping head required = 14.97 m
say 15.00 m 15.00

Efficiency of Motor = 94.00 %

Efficiency of Pump considered = 80.00 %
Combined Efficiency of Pumping = 75.00 %
Pump Power Required = 15.39 KW
= 21.00 HP
Final rating of Pumping set = 78.51 lps x 15 m @ 21 HP

Power input to Motor considering 10% for over

loading and losses in thrust and shaft bearings
required for each pump 20KW - 2 Nos (1W + 1S)

Number of Vertical Turbine Pumpsets Proposed 20KW - 2 Nos (1W + 1S)

 Economic sizing - Rising main

1) ECONOMIC SIZE OF RISING MAIN

COMPARISON OF CAPITALISED COST OF PIPES FOR PUMPING REACH FROM CWS TO GLSR AT HILLOCK

PROJECT: NAKKAPALLI INDUSTRIAL PARK STRETCH: CWS TO GLSR AT HILLOCK

Nature of Fluid: Clear water
==========================================================================================================================
WATER REQUIREMENT: PIPE
BASE YEAR (2020): 6.50 MLD
INTERMEDIATE YEAR (2035): 6.50 MLD
ULTIMATE YEAR(2050): 6.50 MLD

2) Max pumping level 60.00 m

DATA
3) Suction level 9.50 m
DIA TYPE CLASS HWC RATE (Rs/m)
4) Length of Pumping Main 1500.00 m
250 DI K9 140 2265.00
5) Static Head for Pump 50.50 m
300 DI K9 140 2898.00
6) Design period 30 years 3685.00
350 DI K9 140
7) Combined Efficiency of pump 75 % 400 DI K9 140 4443.00
8) Cost of Pumping unit 30000 Rs/Kw 450 DI K9 140 5316.00
9) Interest Rate 12.5 % 500 DI K9 140 6185.00
10) Life of Elec Motor and Pumps 15 yrs
11) Energy Charges 600 paise/unit
12) Pumping Hours 23 Hrs
13) Residual Head 2.00 mtrs
==========================================================================================================================
SOLUTION: First Fifteen Years Second Fifteen Years

1) Discharge at installation 6.50 MLD 6.50 MLD

2) Discharge at the end of 15 years 6.50 MLD 6.50 MLD
3) Average Discharge 6.50 MLD 6.50 MLD
4) Average Hours of pumping average discharge 23.00 hrs 23.00 hrs
5) Average Discharge in Cumecs 0.079 m3/sec 0.079 m3/sec
6) Kw required at the above 1.03 *H1 1.03 *H2
7) Annual cost (Rs.) of electrical Energy 50370 * Kw1 50370 * Kw2
 Economic sizing - Rising main

==========================================================================================================================

TABLE - 1: STRETCH: CWS TO GLSR AT HILLOCK

FIRST STAGE SECOND STAGE
Frictional
Pipe Size, Frictional Velocity Loss in Other Total Frictional Loss Other Total
S. No mm Head loss per 1000 m m/s Pipeline losses Head in Pipeline losses Head
First Second First Second
Stage Stage Stage Stage
Flow Flow Flow Flow m m m m m m
1 250 8.70 8.70 1.60 1.60 13.04 1.96 67.50 13.04 1.96 67.50
2 300 3.58 3.58 1.11 1.11 5.37 0.81 58.67 5.37 0.81 58.67
3 350 1.69 1.69 0.82 0.82 2.53 0.38 55.41 2.53 0.38 55.41
4 400 0.88 0.88 0.62 0.62 1.32 0.20 54.02 1.32 0.20 54.02
5 450 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.74 0.11 53.36 0.74 0.11 53.36
6 500 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.07 53.01 0.45 0.07 53.01
7 600 0.12 0.12 0.28 0.28 0.18 0.03 52.71 0.18 0.03 52.71
8 700 0.06 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.09 0.01 52.60 0.09 0.01 52.60
9 800 0.03 0.03 0.16 0.16 0.05 0.01 52.55 0.05 0.01 52.55
10 900 0.02 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.03 0.00 52.53 0.03 0.00 52.53
==========================================================================================================================

TABLE - 2: STRETCH: CWS TO GLSR AT HILLOCK

KILOWATTS, COST OF PUMP SETS REQUIRED FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES AND PIPE COST
First Stage of Flow Second Stage of Flow
Cost of
Pump Cost Cost of
Pipe Size Class Total Kw req'd Total Kw req'd Pump Cost @ Pipe
S. No @ Rs 30000 Class pipeline in
(mm) of Pipe Head in Plus 50% Head in Plus 50% Rs 30000 per Unit
per KW in of Pipe THS (Rs.)
meters Stand By meters Stand By per KW in THS Length
THS
1 250 DI 67.50 103.96 3118.91 DI 67.50 103.96 3118.91 2265 3397.50
2 300 DI 58.67 90.37 2711.03 DI 58.67 90.37 2711.03 2898 4347.00
3 350 DI 55.41 85.35 2560.45 DI 55.41 85.35 2560.45 3685 5527.50
4 400 DI 54.02 83.20 2496.09 DI 54.02 83.20 2496.09 4443 6664.50
5 450 DI 53.36 82.18 2465.42 DI 53.36 82.18 2465.42 5316 7974.00
6 500 DI 53.01 81.65 2449.54 DI 53.01 81.65 2449.54 6185 9277.50
7 600 DI 52.71 81.19 2435.59 DI 52.71 81.19 2435.59 8157 12235.50
8 700 DI 52.60 81.01 2430.44 DI 52.60 81.01 2430.44 10434 15651.00
9 800 DI 52.55 80.94 2428.24 DI 52.55 80.94 2428.24 12373 18559.50
10 900 DI 52.53 80.91 2427.20 DI 52.53 80.91 2427.20 15171 22756.50
 Economic sizing - Rising main

==========================================================================================================================

TABLE - 3: STRETCH: CWS TO GLSR AT HILLOCK

COMPARITIVE STATEMENT OF OVERALL STRUCTURE OF PUMPING MAIN FOR DIFFERENT PIPE SIZES
First Stage Flow Second Stage Flow
Initial Grand Total
Pipe
Annual Capitalized Capitalized Annual Capitalized Investments of Capitalized Diameter
S. No Cost of Cost of cost for 30 Pipe Material
Energy Energy Total Cost Energy Energy or pump and in
Pump Sets Pump Sets years in THS
Cost in THS in THS Cost in THS Annual (mm)
in THS in THS (Rs)
in THS (Rs) (Rs) in THS (Rs) Energy Cost
in THS (Rs)
1 3118.91 2618.32 17367.07 20485.98 3118.91 2618.32 17367.07 3500.81 27384.29 250 DI
2 2711.03 2275.91 15095.88 17806.91 2711.03 2275.91 15095.88 3042.99 25196.90 300 DI
3 2560.45 2149.50 14257.40 16817.86 2560.45 2149.50 14257.40 2873.97 25219.33 350 DI
4 2496.09 2095.47 13899.02 16395.11 2496.09 2095.47 13899.02 2801.73 25861.34 400 DI
5 2465.42 2069.72 13728.26 16193.69 2465.42 2069.72 13728.26 2767.31 26935.00 450 DI
6 2449.54 2056.39 13639.79 16089.33 2449.54 2056.39 13639.79 2749.48 28116.31 500 DI
7 2435.59 2044.68 13562.14 15997.74 2435.59 2044.68 13562.14 2733.83 30967.06 600 DI
8 2430.44 2040.36 13533.48 15963.92 2430.44 2040.36 13533.48 2728.05 34342.97 700 DI
9 2428.24 2038.51 13521.23 15949.47 2428.24 2038.51 13521.23 2725.58 37234.55 800 DI
10 2427.20 2037.63 13515.39 15942.58 2427.20 2037.63 13515.39 2724.40 41423.48 900 DI
==============================================================================================
CONCLUSION:
Diameter for this stretch of pipeline with least cost is 300 mm dia DI K9
As per Optimal Velocity, adopted Pipe size is 300 mm dia DI K9
==============================================================================================
 CWC sump after WTP
STORAGE
WATER WATER WATER CAPACITY AVG. FINISHED FREE TOP LEVEL
PUMPING (%)/HOURS CAPACITY DEPTH OF DIAMETER OF LWL FSL
STRUCTURE DEMAND demand for DEMAND CONSIDERED GROUND BED LEVEL BOARD OF TANK
HOURS RETENTION (KL) TANK (M) TANK (M) (M) (M)
(MLD) 23hours (KLD) (KL) LEVEL (M) (M) (M) (M)
PERIOD
CWS 1 at WTP 6.50 6.78 6782.61 23.00 2.00 600.00 600.00 4.00 14.00 13.50 9.00 9.50 13.50 0.50 14.00

DESIGN OF PUMPING MAIN FROM CWS to GLSR

COMPUTATION OF FRICTION LOSSES

Pumping from Location Pumping to Location

Strech No. 2
CWS GLSR

Discharge = Q 6.50 MLD 270.833 cum/hr

Discharge in 23.0 hours = Q 6.78 MLD 282.609 cum/hr

Diameter of the pipe = d 300 mm

Hazen williams coefficient = C 140 ( As per CPHEEO manual Table

6.1) Length of pipe line =L 1500.00 m

Hazen-Williams Formula:

Q = 1.292 x 10-5 x C x d2.63 x S0.54

Q = Discharge in cubic metre per hour

d = Diameter of the pipe in mm

v = Velocity in m/s

S = Slope of hydraulic gradeline and

C = Hazen-Williams coefficient

Hydraulic gradient (s)= 0.003578

slope(i)= 1 in 279 m

Friction Loss(hf) = 5.367 m

Head loss in pipe line = 5.367

m
 Other losses@15%= 0.81 m

Add Residual pressure head at

delivery point = 2.00 m

Total loss in pipe line = 6.17 m

RL of Target Location = 60.00 m

HGL = 68.17 m

Suction Level= 9.50 m

Static Head= 50.50 m

Operating Head= 58.67 m

Velocity Calculations:

Discharge (Q)= 0.079 Cum/Sec

Area of the pipe (A)= 0.071 m2

Velocity in the pipe(V)= 1.11 m/s