Fault Stability - Geomechanical Influences in Water Injection Projects
Fault Stability - Geomechanical Influences in Water Injection Projects
net/publication/245277553
Article in Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Revue de l IFP · September 2002
DOI: 10.2516/ogst:2002027
CITATIONS READS
33 295
1 author:
Kes Heffer
Heriot-Watt University
40 PUBLICATIONS 648 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Kes Heffer on 01 August 2014.
Geomechanical Influences
in Water Injection Projects: An Overview
K. Heffer1
1 Industrial Fellow, Heriot-Watt University - United Kingdom
e-mail: [email protected]
Résumé — Présentation générale des effets géomécaniques induits par l’injection d’eau dans les
réservoirs — Au cours de l'injection d'eau, l'augmentation des pressions interstitielles et la diminution de
température entraînent une diminution des contraintes effectives horizontales, notamment à proximité des
puits d'injection. Ce déchargement mécanique peut activer des failles et des fractures naturelles au sein du
réservoir, du recouvrement, des couches inférieures ou des fractures hydrauliques à proximité des puits
d'injection. Ces effets géomécaniques induisent des modifications anisotropes de la perméabilité,
généralement en augmentation, qui devraient être intégrées dans la simulation du réservoir, particu-
lièrement du point de vue de la configuration des puits, afin d'en obtenir les meilleurs avantages
commerciaux.
Permeability scale
Increase
Depends on
Differential stress, q stress path?
Critical state line
Perm. decrease ?
Perm. increase ? Shear-enhanced compaction
re
ilu
fa
tle Decrease
rit
Po
l ,b
re
na
io
co
at
lla
t Elastic
la
Di
ps
e
Hydrostatic compaction
Conceptual after Zhu and Wong (1997) and Crawford et al. (1999)
Figure 1
Generalised permeability-stress map.
K Heffer / Geomechanical Influences in Water Injection Projects: an Overview 417
Shmax
Shmax
Figure 2
Stress and flood directionality.
a): example of breakthrough paths from an injector; b): orientational frequency of major axes of breakthrough in 47 “unfractured” fields
shows peaks at small angles either side of Shmax, as reproduced in numerical modeling (c).
0 0
Shmax
360 1020 0
350
340 30 360 1020 360 1020
320 350
340 30 350
40 320 340 30
310 50 40 320 40
300 60 310 50 310 50
70 300 60 300 60
290 70
290 290 70
280 80
280 80 280 80
270 90 270 90 270 90
260 100
260 100 260 100
250 110
120 250 110 250 110
240 120
230 130 240 240 120
220 140 230 130 230 130
210 150 220 140 220 140
200
190 160
170 210 150 210 150
200
190 160
170 200
190 160
170
180 180 180
Figure 3
Flood directionality and “fractures”. The bias in major azimuthal axes of breakthrough towards Shmax is irrespective of whether the reservoir
is deemed “naturally fractured” or not.
FLOOD DIRECTIONALITY – SPECIFIC FIELDS (Fig. 4) implying that the minimum principal stress axis was
acting suborthogonally to those faults, giving the best chance
Field A. Extensive tracer studies in this large field under for dilatation and conductivity (Fig. 5).
pattern waterflood were able to distinguish tracer break- Field B. A measure of areal anisotropy that was used in
throughs along conductive faults. Prediction of heterogeneities this field (which is also under a pattern waterflood) was
in the modern-day stress distribution across the field was obtained from the temporal correlations of fluctuations in
made with areal distinct element modeling, in which fault production or injection rates at pairs of wells across the field
traces were allowed to slip according to a simple Mohr (Fig. 6). If rates at a well pair fluctuated in phase together, a
Coulomb’s Law. With boundary tractions on the model positive correlation coefficient was calculated; whilst nega-
chosen to match the average stress state orientation measured tive correlation coefficients were obtained for anti-phase
at a number of wells, an equilibrium distribution of stresses fluctuations. Strengths of the correlation coefficients were
was obtained, which could be interrogated at all fault trace examined according to the orientations of the lines between
segments. It was found that the modeled axes of Shmax close injector-producer pairs relative to the local azimuth of Shmax.
by the conductive faults were all subparallel to the fault strike It was found that the field could be split into roughly equal
418 Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Rev. IFP, Vol. 57 (2002), No. 5
Fault strike
Figure 4
Field A. a): modeled axes of principal horizontal stresses (maximum is longer); b): orientational distribution of conductive faults relative to
local directionof Shmax.
Shmax
Time
In situ faults
and fractures Production
rates
Water injection
Shmax
Figure 6
Idealised depiction of rate correlations. The (Spearman rank)
correlation coefficients range from –1 for perfectly anti-
Figure 5
correlated; to 0 for completely uncorrelated; to +1 for a
Fault strike and stress. Faults subparallel to Shmax are more perfectly correlated pair of sequences (as shown in this
easily dilated to become conductive to water. example).
areas, between which the orientational distributions of watercut were observed to be very closely aligned with one
measured Shmax were approximately orthogonal; the or other of the fault trends across the field. The interpretation
respective azimuthal distributions of the strengths of of this observation is that faults are conductive when striking
correlation coefficients in the 2 parts of the field also showed subparallel to the local orientation of Shmax; in such situations
the same approximate 90 degree rotation (Fig. 7). the faults are more conductive and allow water to
Furthermore, an areal interpolation of Shmax orientations breakthrough to producers more readily. VISAGETM (VIPS,
allowed the watercut observations at wells to be plotted as a 2001) finite element modelling allowed estimation of the
function of the local orientation of Shmax (Fig. 8): the peaks in magnitudes of the stresses that are consistent with the
K Heffer / Geomechanical Influences in Water Injection Projects: an Overview 419
N
Basement fault trend
Northeast region
Southwest region
Principal horizontal stress direction (Shmax)
Figure 7
Results of rate correlation analysis for 2 parts of field B. The orientational distribution of strengths of correlation coefficient follow those of
the maximum horizontal principal stresses. The line dividing the 2 parts of the field overlies a major basement fault.
360 0
10
350 20
340 30
320 40
310 50
300 60
290 70
280 80 Average WOR
270 90 Fault strike
260 100 frequency
250 110
240 120
230 130
220 140
210 150
200 190 170 160
180
(a) (b)
Figure 8
Field B. a): interpolated map of orientations of Shmax across field; b): (red) average produced water/oil ratio at producing wells as a function
of the local orientation of Shmax, compared with (green) the azimuthal distribution of fault strikes.
observed stress orientations and also with equilibrium on the RATE CORRELATIONS AS STRAIN INDICATORS
faults in the field. It was found that the areas of low modeled
magnitudes of minimum principal stress (where the rock- Similar exercises in 6 other fields gave an aggregated
fracture complex is loosely compressed) were collocated orientational distribution of strengths of rate correlations that
with areas of high watercuts in the field, again suggesting the was markedly biased towards Shmax (Fig. 10a). In fact, on
involvement of conductive faults in water breakthrough average, the correlation coefficient for well pairs aligned
(Fig. 9). This field data strongly supports the concept that the along the local direction of Shmin was found to be negative.
conductivity of faults is dependent upon both the orientation This implies, for example, that an increase in rate at an
and the magnitudes of the local stress state (e.g. Townend injector is associated with a decrease at a producer offset
and Zoback, 2000). Further details of these and other field aligned along Shmin; ostensibly a contradiction of Darcy’s
studies are given in Heffer et al. (1995). Law! However, the orientational variations make good sense
420 Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Rev. IFP, Vol. 57 (2002), No. 5
On 54 x 66 grid
1.100
990
880
770
660
550
440
330
220
110
(a) (b) 0
Figure 9
Field B. a): map of magnitudes of maximum principal horizontal stress modelled with VISAGE geomechanical simulator (stresses are more
compressional in the sequence orange-yellow-green-turquoise-blue). b): map of cumulative water/oil ratios at producing wells across field
(ignore artefacts of interpolation routine outside field area). There is a good spatial correlation between the areas of low stress magnitude
(orange-yellow) and high water/oil ratio (red).
Shmax
z
(a) (b)
Figure 10
a): aggregated orientational distribution of rate correlation coefficients relative to direction of local Shmax. The data was taken from 8 field
areas and summarises the rate correlation coefficients of over half a million well pairs (green = raw data used; red = hi-pass filter applied to
data before correlations; black circle = zero correlation line).
b): theoretical areal distribution of correlaton in xx-strain at critical point (fall-offwith lag distance ~1/r).
in terms of strain correlations: changes in strain in the vicinity exemplified in the data from field B, which is shown as
of one well, which will be manifest as fracture/fault conduc- stacked correlation coefficients in Figure 11 (consider this
tivity changes, are associated with particular orientational diagram as having all injectors stacked at the central point,
patterns of strain changes at offset locations. Figure 10b and the colours as indicating the average strength of rate
shows the theoretical spatial autocorrelation of xx-strains, correlation coefficients at offset points around the injectors).
which would be pertinent to Shmax directed along the y-axis. The high values of correlation at points near the edges of the
A further feature of the field data that is even more at odds spatial lags can be seen in the figure. Although the long-
with conventional hydrology is that some of the most range nature of the correlations is not yet fully understood, a
significant correlations are large-range; indeed between well clue exists in yet another feature of the data: there is a strong
pairs at opposite ends of the field. The latter finding is hint of the fault trends in the field in the autocorrelation
K Heffer / Geomechanical Influences in Water Injection Projects: an Overview 421
Figure 11
Field B. Stacked rate correlations. Colours depict the average strength of rate correlation coefficient for spatial lags relative to the central
point. Red indicates highly positive. Dark blue indicates highly negative. Note the boundary highs and the trends parallel to faulting trends in
the field.
100
90 Isotropic
Favourable
80
Areal sweep efficiency
Unfavourable
to breakthrough (%)
70
60
50
40
5 spot pattern
30 Ky/Kx = 16
20
10
0
0.1 0 10
Mobility ratio
Figure 12
The prize – theory. Classical calculations of the sensitivity of areal sweep efficiency of a flood to the alignment of the five-spot well pattern
in a reservoir of anisotropic permeability. The sweep efficiency is quoted for the time of water breakthrough. The efficiency is highly
dependent upon whether the well pattern is aligned favourably (green) or unfavourably (red). Compared with curve for an isotropic reservoir
(blue). All plotted against the mobility ratio of the injected/swept fluids (after Caudle and Loneric, 1960).