Structuralism a-WPS Office
Structuralism a-WPS Office
Much of structuralism's difficulty comes from the fact that its founding fathers
have developed a fondness for inventing their own language and terms or definitions
(Stephen 2000: 279). Its language of discussion and writings often very difficult
and tangled, the issue complex and sometimes confused.
At its simplest, structuralism claims that the nature of every element in any given
situation has no significance by itself and is, in fact, determined by all the
other elements involved in that situation.
Structuralists believe that all human activity is constructed rather than natural
or "essential." Consequently, it is the systems of organization that are important.
What we do is always a matter of selection within a system of differences and has
meaning only in its relation to other possible activities within that system, not
to some meaning that emanates from nature or the divine.
Structuralism originated in the early 20th century and was initially developed in
the field of linguistics by Ferdinand de Saussure, a Swiss linguist. He introduced
key concepts such as:
Langue and Parole: "Langue" refers to the underlying system of language, while
"parole" refers to actual speech acts.
Signifier and Signified: A word (signifier) gains meaning through its association
with an idea or concept (signified).
Binary Oppositions: Structuralism often relies on pairs of opposites (e.g., good
vs. evil, light vs. dark) to understand meaning.
2. Structures Govern Human Activity: All human thought and culture are shaped by
underlying structures, whether in language, myths, or social practices.
Roland Barthes: Argued that texts should be seen as systems of signs, where meaning
is determined by cultural codes rather than the author's intention.
5. Conclusion
References