GST Litigation Course Day2
GST Litigation Course Day2
Pending cases
SC – 70k+
are very high
Dist. &
HC – 40L+ Subordinate
Court – 2.75Cr+
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
National Litigation Policy
46%+ cases
Govt. biggest
are linked to
contributor
Govt.
State
Revised NLP?? Litigation
Policies
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
National Litigation Policy – Stages of Litigation
Pre- Post
Litigation Litigation
Litigation
Emphasis on exploring alternative means of dispute resolution
Pre Notice
Consultation Appeal
SCN
Further, the National Litigation Policy is yet to be finalised by the Government and there is no concrete
roadmap from the Department to check pendency of cases and increasing expenditure.
The National Litigation Policy was drafted in 2010 and the Department during the Demand for Grants
(2018-19) had submitted that it is under active consideration of the Government.
The Committee, accordingly recommends the Department to expedite the formulation of National
Litigation Policy.
Confusing
Frequent /
Pressure of clarifications &/or
Retrospective
‘Revenue targets’ judicial
amendments
pronouncements
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Why disputes are rising in GST?
Compounding
Prosecution Appeals
of offences
Clear Indication on
Taxable Event Whom Levy
attracting the Levy imposed & who is
obliged to pay
Measure or Value
Rate of Tax to which rate will
be applied
• The Observations in Para 104 to 111 are few anomalies noted by the
Honourable Supreme Court and has observed that GST Council shall
consider them in accordance with the law.
• The formula creates a distinction between suppliers having a higher
component of input goods than those having a higher component of
input services, and must be read down accordingly, must be rejected.
The formula is not perfect. matter would be considered by the GST
Council and anomalies as pointed out by the Supreme Court would be
removed.
• The law permits rectification of errors and omissions only at the initial
stages of Forms GSTR1 and GSTR3, but in the specified manner.
• Airtel had contended that, due to non-operability of Form GSTR2A at
the relevant time (July to September 2017), it had been denied of
access to the Credit Ledger.
• SC held that...despite an express mechanism provided by Section
39(9) read with Rule 61, it was not open to the HC to proceed on the
assumption that the only remedy that can enable the assessee to
enjoy the benefit of the seamless utilisation of the input tax credit
was by way of rectification of its return submitted in Form GSTR3B for
the relevant period in which the error had occurred.
Section - 73 Section 74
(a) fraud; or • fraud, or
(b) collusion; or • any wilful-misstatement or
(c) wilful mis-statement; or • suppression of facts
(d) suppression of facts; or • to evade tax
(1) Where it appears to the proper officer that any tax has not been paid or short paid
or erroneously refunded, or where input tax credit has been wrongly availed or
utilised for any reason, other than the reason of fraud or any wilful-misstatement or
suppression of facts to evade tax, he shall serve notice on the person chargeable with
tax which has not been so paid or which has been so short paid or to whom the
refund has erroneously been made, or who has wrongly availed or utilised input tax
credit, requiring him to show cause as to why he should not pay the amount
specified in the notice along with interest payable thereon under section 50 and a
penalty leviable under the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder.
(2) The proper officer shall issue the notice under sub-section (1) at least three
months prior to the time limit specified in sub-section (10) for issuance of order.
(3) Where a notice has been issued for any period under sub-section (1), the proper
officer may serve a statement, containing the details of tax not paid or short paid or
erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised for such periods
other than those covered under sub-section (1), on the person chargeable with tax.
(4) Where a notice has been issued for any period under sub-section (1), the proper
officer may serve a statement, containing the details of tax not paid or short paid or
erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised for such periods
other than those covered under sub-section (1), on the person chargeable with tax.
Foe SCN issued u/s 73(1) At least 3 months prior to issue of order u/s 73(9) i.e.
2 years and 9 months from the due date of filing
annual return for the F.Y to which the demand pertains
or from date of erroneous refund as per u/s 73(2)
For adjudication order passed u/s 73(9) Within 3 year from the due date of filing annual return
for the year F.Y to which the demand pertains or
within 3 years from date of erroneous refund as per u/s
73(10)
(1) Where it appears to the proper officer that any tax has not been paid or short paid or
erroneously refunded or where input tax credit has been wrongly availed or utilised by
reason of fraud, or any wilful-misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax, he
shall serve notice on the person chargeable with tax which has not been so paid or
which has been so short paid or to whom the refund has erroneously been made, or
who has wrongly availed or utilised input tax credit, requiring him to show cause as to
why he should not pay the amount specified in the notice along with interest payable
thereon under section 50 and a penalty equivalent to the tax specified in the notice.
(2) The proper officer shall issue the notice under sub-section (1) at least six months
prior to the time limit specified in sub-section (10) for issuance of order
2 Tax and interest paid within 30 days of issuance of Penalty equal to 25% of Tax & all processing
SCN deemed to be concluded
3 Tax and interest paid within 30 days of Penalty equal to 50% of Tax & all processing
communication of adjudication order deemed to be concluded
4 Tax and interest paid after 30 days of 100% of Tax
communication of adjudication order
NOTE:-1 Penalty shall also be not chargeable in case where the self-assessed tax or any amount collected as tax
is paid (with interest) within 30 days from the due date of payment.
NOTE:-2 Where Payment of interest is mandatory even if not specified in adjudicating order as per u/s 74(9).
NOTE:-3 any penalty imposed u/s 74, no penalty for the same act or omission shall be imposed on the same
person under any other provision of Act.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice 54
Penalty under Demand & Recovery
Show cause notice Order
Section 73 Bonafied Within 2 year & 9 months Within 3 years from due Section 73 Bonafied
of services from due date date of annual GST return
annual return filing.
Section 74 Malafied Within 4 years & 6 Within 5 years from due Section 74 Malafied
months from the due date of annual GST return
date of annual GST Return
Any amount of tax No Time Limit Within 1 year from date Any amount of tax
collected but not paid of issue of notice collected but not paid
DRC-04: Acknowledgement of
Acceptance of Payment made Voluntarily
DRC-05: Intimation of Conclusion of Proceedings
• Even if Executive Officer doesn’t agree with demand, he will raise SCN
CAG Para • Try to convince CAG that demand is not justified
Cross Empowerment
• CBIC Letter DOF No. CBEC/20/43/01/2017-GST(FT) dated 5-Oct-2018
• Both Central & State tax administrations shall have power to take
intelligence based enforcement action in respect of entire value
chain.
• Thus for intelligence based inputs both are cross empowered.
CBIC have prescribed the monetary limits within for issuance of Show Cause Notices as per
Circular No. 31/05/2018-GST, dated 09-Feb-2018 which is as follows
Amount of ICGST (including Demand <= Rs. 20 Rs. 20 Lakhs < Demand <= Demand > Rs. 2
Cess) involved in a case Lakhs Rs. 2 Crore Crore
Amount of ICGST and CGST Demand <= Rs. 20 Rs. 20 Lakhs < Demand <= Demand > Rs. 2
(including Cess) involved in Lakhs Rs. 2 Crore Crore
a case
GENERAL DISCIPLINES RELATING TO
DETERMINATION OF TAX
3. Amount demanded in order must not exceed the amount mentioned in SCN
5. Officer issuing Order must be different from him who issued SCN.
GENERAL DISCIPLINES RELATING TO
DETERMINATION OF TAX
6. Adjudication proceedings deemed to be concluded if not decided within stipulated time
period.
7. Where the service of notice is stayed by an order of a Court or Appellate Tribunal, the
period of such stay shall be excluded.
9. The Interest shall create automatic charge whether or not specified in the order
determining the tax liability.
10. Direct recovery proceedings U/s 79 shall be initiated for any pending self-assessed tax
liability along with interest in accordance with the returns furnished either GSTR-1 or GSTR-3B.
EXTENDED PERIOD
Where Notice does not allege suppression, etc with intent to
evade, extended period (U/s 74) cannot be invoked. – Jagron
Machine Tools vs CCE, [1993 (65) ELT 300 (CEGAT – New Delhi)]
The Supreme Court observed that personal hearing enables the concerned
authority to watch the demeanour of the witness etc and also clear up his
doubts during the course of the arguments. – Automative Tyre Manufacturers
Asson. Vs Designated Authority, [ (2011) 263 ELT 481 (Supreme Court)]
Facility of grievance
Validity of Show Cause Notice issued by an officer in
excess of monetary limit not acceptable
▪ Pahawa Chemicals (P) Ltd. vs. CCE – 2005 (181) ELT 339 (SC).
▪ Palak Designer Diamond Jewellery Vs. UOI – 2021 – TIOL – 424
– CESTAT - AHM
▪ Aeon Construction Products Ltd. vs. CCE – 2005 (184) ELT 120
(SC)
▪ Palak Designer Diamond Jewellery vs. UOI – 2019-TIOL-1756-
HC-AHM-CX
87
Show Cause Notice – a ‘condition precedent’ to a
demand
▪ Gokak Patel Volkart Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE -1987 (28) ELT 53 (SC)
▪ Madhumilan Syntex Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI -1981 (35) ELT 349 (SC)
▪ Metal Forgings vs. UOI-2002 (146) ELT 241 (SC)
88
Mere letter or communication asking for payment is
not a ‘show cause notice’
▪ Metal Forgings vs. UOI (supra)
▪ CC vs. Merchant Impex – 2012 (276) ELT 458 (Kar.)
▪ Steel Ingots vs. UOI – 1988 (36) ELT 529 (MP)
▪ Sidwell Refrigeration vs. CCE – 2002 (145) ELT 682 (Tri-Del)
89
Show Cause Notice must be in writing?
90
Notice must contain all essential details
91
Show Cause Notice shall not be based on
assumptions and presumptions
▪ Oudh Sugar Mills Ltd. vs. UOI -1978 (2) ELT (J172) (SC)
92
Show Cause Notice shall not be based on
assumptions and presumptions
▪ Bihari Silk & Rayon Processing Mills (P) Ltd. vs. CCE-2000
(121) ELT 617 [Trib- LB(3/2)]
▪ Hindustan Aluminium Corp. Ltd. vs. Supdt. of C.Ex. - 1981 (8)
ELT 642 (Del.)
▪ JBA Printing Inks Ltd. vs. UOI -1980 (6) ELT 121
(Mad)
▪ Gwalior Rayon (Wgt.) Ltd.vs. UOI -1982 (10) ELT 844
(MP).
93
CCE vs. Siddhartha Tubes – 2004 (170) ELT 33
(Tribunal)
94
Validity of the amount recovered during investigation
and consequential refund thereof
• Shri Nandhi Dhall Mills India Pvt. Ltd. vs. SIO -2021-TIOL-828-
HC-MAD-GST
• Dabur India Ltd. vs. State of UP – 2002-TIOL-2781-SC-CX-LB
• Vodafone Essar South India Ltd. vs. UOI -2009-TIOL-117-HC-
MUM-CUS.
• Cleartrip Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI – 2016-TIOL-863-HC-MUM-ST
95
Structure of SCN : A SCN should ideally comprise of the
following parts, though it may vary from case to case :
97
Status of limitation period for F.Y.2017-18 to 2019-20:
SR.NO. Relevant F.Y. to which Due date for Last date for Remarks
the demand relates furnishing the AR in issuance of the show
FORM GSTR-9 cause notice as per
S.73(2) r/w.
S.73(10)
98
S.74(10) – Computation of time limit
▪ Proper officer to issue the Order under sub-section (9) i.e. the
adjudication order within a period of 5 years from the due date for
furnishing of annual return for the financial year to which the
demand or erroneous refund relates.
99
Status of limitation period for F.Y.2017-18 to 2019-20 [S.74(2) r/w. S.74(10) refers].
SR.NO. Relevant F.Y. to Due date for Last date for Remarks
which the demand furnishing the AR issuance of the
relates in FORM GSTR- 9 show cause notice
as per S.74(2) r/w.
S.74(10)
▪ Fraud; or
▪ wilful misstatement of facts; or
▪ wilful suppression of facts exists
101
Fraud vs Negligence
104
“Will non-supply of information not mandated under the statute
amount to suppression of facts?
▪ Apex Electricals (P) Ltd. vs. UOI – 1992 (61) ELT 413 (Guj.)
▪ Explanation 2 to S.74.
105
Can mere claiming wrong classification or wrong exemption be
considered a suppression or misstatement of facts?
▪ Biomax Life Sciences Ltd. vs. CCE – 2021 (375) ELT 263
(Tribunal)
106
Is ignorance of law an excuse?
•Peter & Millere Packers vs. CCE – 2008 (232) ELT 695 (Tribunal)
•D. Cawasji & Co. vs. State of Mysore – 1978 (2) ELT J154 (SC)
107
REPRESENTATION AGAINST SHOW CAUSE
NOTICE & ADJUDICATION PROCEEDINGS
10
8
Study and Analysis of the SCN
109
Study and Analysis of the SCN
• Basis of SCN/Demand
▪ Scrutiny of Returns
▪ Audit
▪ Anti-evasion or Preventive action
▪ DGGI action
110
Study and Analysis of the SCN
• Allegation/charges in the SCN
▪ Nature of allegations
▪ Basis of allegations
▪ Evidence
▪ Interpretation of the statutory provisions
▪ Judgements
▪ AAR/AAAR Ruling
▪ Technical Report
▪ Third Party statements
▪ Discrepancies in Records
▪ CBIC’s Circular
▪ Recurring demand
▪ Revenue’s pending appeal 111
Study and Analysis of the SCN
• Computation of demand
▪ Classification
▪ Valuation
▪ Exemption notification
▪ Rate of tax
▪ Cum-tax principle
112
Study and Analysis of the SCN
113
Study and Analysis of the SCN
• Cross-examination
▪ Need for cross-examination
▪ Can cross-examination be sought as a vested right?
▪ Persons whose cross-examination can be sought
▪ Admissibility of the statement in case the person does not appear for the
cross-examination
▪ Written submissions on conclusion of the cross-examination
▪ Refusal to grant cross-examination – Consequence and course of action
▪ Law relating to cross-examination.
114
Drafting of Reply to SCN
115
Drafting of Reply to SCN
• Grounds of Defence
▪ Merits of the case
▪ Limitation
▪ Computation
▪ Challenge to the penal action and other action proposed
116
Drafting of Reply to SCN
117
Drafting of Reply to SCN
• Procedural requirements
▪ Payment of tax, etc. u/s. 73(5)/74(5) or in terms of other provisions - Form GST DRC-03
▪ Payment of tax, etc. u/s. 73(8)/74 (8) or S.129 (1) – Form GST DRC-03
118
Drafting of Reply to SCN
• Procedural requirements
119
Adjudication proceedings:
▪ Orient Paper Mills Ltd. vs. UOI – 1978 (2) ELT J345 (SC)
▪ Orient Paper Mills Ltd. vs. UOI – 1978 (2) ELT J382 (SC)
▪ CCE vs. National Tobacco Co. of India Ltd -1978 (2) ELT J 416 (SC)
120
Adjudication proceedings:
121
Adjudication proceedings:
▪ Bindal Sponge Ltd. vs. UOI – 2015 (122) ELT 657 (Tribunal)
▪ Afloat Textiles (P) Ltd. vs. CCE – 2007 (215) ELT 198 (Tri-Ahd.)
122
Adjudication proceedings:
• Fair and reasonable hearing
▪ Havacrumb Rubber (P) Ltd. vs. Supdt. of C. Ex.-1983 (14) ELT 1685 (Kerala)
▪ Aluminium Corporation of India Ltd. vs. UOI - 1978 (2) ELT J 320 (SC)
123
Representation before the Adjudicating Authority:
124
Some Do’s & Don’ts
• A few Do’s
• Show Cause Notice:
• Do make a note of the date of issue of the SCN
• Do make a note of the date of receipt of the SCN
• Do place acknowledgement of the receipt of the SCN by way of letter, etc.
• Do check that all RUDs are available with the SCN
• Do ask for the return of non-relied upon documents, if any
• Do ask for the free translation in in English of the statement/s, if recorded in a language other than
English.
125
Reply to SCN
126
Adjudication Proceedings
127
A few Don’ts
Vital or Empowers PO
Only 2 sub-
Very Brief Indispensable to Summon
sections
Role Any Person
Section - 73 Section 74
(a) fraud; or • fraud, or
(b) collusion; or • any wilful-misstatement or
(c) wilful mis-statement; or • suppression of facts
(d) suppression of facts; or • to evade tax
(1) Where it appears to the proper officer that any tax has not been paid or short paid
or erroneously refunded, or where input tax credit has been wrongly availed or
utilised for any reason, other than the reason of fraud or any wilful-misstatement or
suppression of facts to evade tax, he shall serve notice on the person chargeable with
tax which has not been so paid or which has been so short paid or to whom the
refund has erroneously been made, or who has wrongly availed or utilised input tax
credit, requiring him to show cause as to why he should not pay the amount
specified in the notice along with interest payable thereon under section 50 and a
penalty leviable under the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder.
(2) The proper officer shall issue the notice under sub-section (1) at least three
months prior to the time limit specified in sub-section (10) for issuance of order.
(3) Where a notice has been issued for any period under sub-section (1), the proper
officer may serve a statement, containing the details of tax not paid or short paid or
erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised for such periods
other than those covered under sub-section (1), on the person chargeable with tax.
(4) Where a notice has been issued for any period under sub-section (1), the proper
officer may serve a statement, containing the details of tax not paid or short paid or
erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised for such periods
other than those covered under sub-section (1), on the person chargeable with tax.
Foe SCN issued u/s 73(1) At least 3 months prior to issue of order u/s 73(9) i.e.
2 years and 9 months from the due date of filing
annual return for the F.Y to which the demand pertains
or from date of erroneous refund as per u/s 73(2)
For adjudication order passed u/s 73(9) Within 3 year from the due date of filing annual return
for the year F.Y to which the demand pertains or
within 3 years from date of erroneous refund as per u/s
73(10)
(1) Where it appears to the proper officer that any tax has not been paid or short paid or
erroneously refunded or where input tax credit has been wrongly availed or utilised by
reason of fraud, or any wilful-misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax, he
shall serve notice on the person chargeable with tax which has not been so paid or
which has been so short paid or to whom the refund has erroneously been made, or
who has wrongly availed or utilised input tax credit, requiring him to show cause as to
why he should not pay the amount specified in the notice along with interest payable
thereon under section 50 and a penalty equivalent to the tax specified in the notice.
(2) The proper officer shall issue the notice under sub-section (1) at least six months
prior to the time limit specified in sub-section (10) for issuance of order
2 Tax and interest paid within 30 days of issuance of Penalty equal to 25% of Tax & all processing
SCN deemed to be concluded
3 Tax and interest paid within 30 days of Penalty equal to 50% of Tax & all processing
communication of adjudication order deemed to be concluded
4 Tax and interest paid after 30 days of 100% of Tax
communication of adjudication order
NOTE:-1 Penalty shall also be not chargeable in case where the self-assessed tax or any amount collected as tax
is paid (with interest) within 30 days from the due date of payment.
NOTE:-2 Where Payment of interest is mandatory even if not specified in adjudicating order as per u/s 74(9).
NOTE:-3 any penalty imposed u/s 74, no penalty for the same act or omission shall be imposed on the same
person under any other provision of Act.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice 159
Penalty under Demand & Recovery
Show cause notice Order
Section 73 Bonafied Within 2 year & 9 months Within 3 years from due Section 73 Bonafied
of services from due date date of annual GST return
annual return filing.
Section 74 Malafied Within 4 years & 6 Within 5 years from due Section 74 Malafied
months from the due date of annual GST return
date of annual GST Return
Any amount of tax No Time Limit Within 1 year from date Any amount of tax
collected but not paid of issue of notice collected but not paid
DRC-04: Acknowledgement of
Acceptance of Payment made Voluntarily
DRC-05: Intimation of Conclusion of Proceedings
Where it appears to the proper officer Where it appears to the proper officer
that any tax has not been paid or short that any tax has not been paid or short
paid or erroneously refunded, or where paid or erroneously refunded or where
input tax credit has been wrongly availed input tax credit has been wrongly availed
or utilised for any reason, other than the or utilised by reason of fraud, or any
reason of fraud or any wilful- wilful-misstatement or suppression of
misstatement or suppression of facts to facts to evade tax,
evade tax,
he shall serve notice on the person chargeable he shall serve notice on the person chargeable with
with tax which has not been so paid or which tax which has not been so paid or which has been
has been so short paid or to whom the refund so short paid or to whom the refund has
has erroneously been made, or who has erroneously been made, or who has wrongly
wrongly availed or utilised input tax credit, availed or utilised input tax credit, requiring him to
requiring him to show cause as to why he show cause as to why he should not pay the
should not pay the amount specified in the amount specified in the notice along with interest
notice along with interest payable thereon under payable thereon under section 50 and a penalty
section 50 and a penalty leviable under the equivalent to the tax specified in the notice.
provisions of this Act or the rules made
thereunder.
Issue of notice u/s/73(1) shall be at least 3 Issue of notice u/s 74(1) shall be at
months prior to the time limits specified in least 6 months prior to the time limit
sub.sec.10 for issuance of orders. specified in sub.sec.10 for issuance of
orders.
When the service of the notice is stayed When the service of the notice is stayed
by an order of a court or Appellate by an order of a court or Appellate
Tribunal, the period of stay shall be Tribunal, the period of stay shall be
excluded in computing the period** (vide excluded in computing the period** (vide
sec.75(1) sec.75(1)
A statement showing the details of tax A statement showing the details of tax
not paid or short paid erroneously not paid or short paid erroneously
refunded or ITC wrongly availed or refunded or ITC wrongly availed or
utilized has also to be served. utilized has also to be served.
If the grounds are the same as are mentioned in If the grounds are the same as are mentioned in
the earlier notice then the service of statement the earlier notice then the service of statement
deemed to be service of the notice. deemed to be service of the notice.
On receipt of such information, the proper On receipt of such information, the proper officer
officer need not serve any notice u/s 73(1) or need not serve any notice u/s 74(1) or statement
statement u/s 73(1) in respect of the tax so paid u/s 74(1) in respect of the tax so paid or any
or any penalty payable under the provisions of penalty payable under the provisions of this act or
this act or the rules made thereunder. the rules made thereunder.
If the payment so made is noticed with any If the payment so made is noticed with any short
short fall, the proper officer may proceed to fall, the proper officer may proceed to issue notice.
issue notice.
If person chargeable with tax paid such tax along If person chargeable with tax paid such tax
with interest payable u/s 50 within 30 days of along with interest and penalty equivalent to
issue of show cause notice. 25% of such tax within 30 days of issue of
No penalty is payable. The notice shall deemed to notice, all proceedings deemed to be concluded.
be concluded
If the notice is rebutted, the proper officer If the notice is rebutted, the proper officer after
after considering the representation may considering the representation determine the amount
determine the tax, interest and penalty of tax, interest and penalty due from such person and
equivalent to10% of tax or 10,000/= issue an order.
whichever is higher
• Orders shall be issued within 3 years from • Orders shall be issued within 5 years from the
the due date for filing of annual return for due date for filing of annual return for the
the financial year and within**3 years in financial year and within **5 years in the case of
the case of erroneous refund. erroneous refund.
• If the order is not issued within the above time
• If the order is not issued within the above limit, it shall be deemed to be concluded
time limit, it shall be deemed to be
concluded
• When the issuance of the order is stayed by an order of a • When the service of the issuance of
court or Appellate Tribunal, the period of stay shall be order is stayed by an order of a
excluded in computing the period (vide sec.75(1) court or Appellate Tribunal, the
period of stay shall be excluded in
computing the period (vide
sec.75(1)
(1) Where the service of notice or issuance of order is stayed by an order of a court
or Appellate Tribunal, the period of such stay shall be excluded in computing the
period specified in sub-sections (2) and (10) of section 73 or sub-sections (2) and
(10) of section 74, as the case may be.
(2) Where any Appellate Authority or Appellate Tribunal or court concludes that the
notice issued under sub-section (1) of section 74 is not sustainable for the reason
that the charges of fraud or any wilful-misstatement or suppression of facts to evade
tax has not been established against the person to whom the notice was issued, the
proper officer shall determine the tax payable by such person, deeming as if the
notice was issued under sub-section (1) of section 73.
Explanation-
For the purposes of this section, the term “tax” shall include the amount of
tax evaded or the amount of input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised or
refund wrongly taken under the provisions of this Act, the State Goods and
Services Tax Act, the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union
Territory Goods and Services Tax Act and cess levied under the Goods and
Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act.
This provision deals with payment of any amount collected as tax but not
remitted to the Central/State Government or Union Territory. This section
requires him to make the payment forthwith regardless of whether the
related supplies are taxable or not.
(2) Where any amount is required to be paid to the Government under sub-section (1), and
which has not been so paid, the proper officer may serve on the person liable to pay such
amount a notice requiring him to show cause as to why the said amount as specified in the
notice, should not be paid by him to the Government and why a penalty equivalent to the
amount specified in the notice should not be imposed on him under the provisions of this
Act.
(8) The proper officer, in his order, shall set out the relevant facts and
the basis of his decision.
(9) The amount paid to the Government under sub-section (1) or sub-
section (3) shall be adjusted against the tax payable, if any, by the
person in relation to the supplies referred to in sub-section (1).
(1) A registered person who has paid the Central tax and State tax or, as the case
may be, the Central tax and the Union territory tax on a transaction considered by
him to be an intra-State supply, but which is subsequently held to be an inter-State
supply, shall be refunded the amount of taxes so paid in such manner and subject to
such conditions as may be prescribed.
(2) A registered person who has paid integrated tax on a transaction considered by
him to be an inter-State supply, but which is subsequently held to be an intra-
State supply, shall not be required to pay any interest on the amount of central tax
and State tax or, as the case may be, the Central tax and the Union territory tax
payable.
SUMMARY OF NOTICE/
STATEMENT FURNISHED E-UPLOADING OF SUMMARY OF
ELECTRONICALLY ADJUDICATION ORDER
REPLY TO SHOW
PO serve – mentioning amount CAUSE NOTICE In Form GST DRC – 07 Summary of Rectification of summary
payable specifying adjudication order
In Form GST DRC – 06
order
a) Notice in Sec 73(1), 74(1), 75(2), In Sec 73(9), 74(9), 1. Tax In accordance with sec 161
Summary in Form GST DRC-01 76(3) Treated as notice in Form GST DRC - 08
2. Interest of recovery
b) Notice in Sec 73(3), 74(3), 3. Penalty
Summary in Form GST DRC-02 U/s 73(9), 74(9) , 76(3)
(2) Where, before the service of notice or statement, the person chargeable with tax makes payment of the tax
and interest in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (5) of section 73 or, as the case may be, tax,
interest and penalty in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (5) of section 74, or where any person
makes payment of tax, interest, penalty or any other amount due in accordance with the provisions of the Act 2
whether on his own ascertainment or, as communicated by the proper officer under sub-rule (1A), he shall
inform the proper officer of such payment in FORM GST DRC-03 and the proper officer shall issue an
acknowledgement, accepting the payment made by the said person in FORM GST DRC– 04.
3(2A) Where the person referred to in sub-rule (1A) has made partial payment of the amount communicated to
him or desires to file any submissions against the proposed liability, he may make such submission in Part B of
FORM GST DRC-01A.
(3) Where the person chargeable with tax makes payment of tax and interest under
subsection (8) of section 73 or, as the case may be, tax, interest and penalty under sub-
section (8) of section 74 within thirty days of the service of a notice under sub-rule (1), or
where the person concerned makes payment of the amount referred to in sub-section (1) of
section 129 within fourteen days of detention or seizure of the goods and conveyance, he
shall intimate the proper officer of such payment in FORM GST DRC-03 and the proper
officer shall issue an order in FORM GST DRC-05 concluding the proceedings in respect of
the said notice.
(4) The representation referred to in sub-section (9) of section 73 or sub-section (9) of
section 74 or sub-section (3) of section 76 or the reply to any notice issued under any
section whose summary has been uploaded electronically in FORM GST DRC-01 under
sub-rule (1) shall be furnished in FORM GST DRC-06.
(5) A summary of the order issued under section 52 or section 62 or section 63 or section 64
or section 73 or section 74 or section 75 or section 76 or section 122 or section 123 or
section 124 or section 125 or section 127 or section 129 or section 130 shall be uploaded
electronically in FORM GST DRC-07, specifying therein the amount of tax, interest and
penalty payable by the person chargeable with tax.
(6) The order referred to in sub-rule (5) shall be treated as the notice for recovery.
(7) Where a rectification of the order has been passed in accordance with the provisions of
section 161 or where an order uploaded on the system has been withdrawn, a summary of
the rectification order or of the withdrawal order shall be uploaded electronically by the
proper officer in FORM GST DRC-08.”
Superintend of Central Tax made proper officers for the purpose of issuing SCN and
passing orders under sub-sections (1), (2), (3), (5), (6), (7), (9) and (10) of
Section 74. (Cases involving fraud/suppression etc where extended period is
invoked)
Superintend of Central Tax were already proper officers for the purpose of issue of
SCN and orders u/s 73 (where there is no fraud/suppression etc) vide Circular
No. 3/3/2017 - GST dated 5th July, 2017
Monetary limits for the purpose of Adjudication u/s 73 & 74 laid down
Judgement:-the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside and
the matter remanded back to the second respondent for a fresh consideration in the
light of the observations contained in this order.
• Once it is admitted that credit was available to the petitioner on the date of switch over from VAT
regime to GST regime and once it is admitted that the petitioner may be entitled to make a claim for
this credit in other modes, we think that the second respondent ought to have given a purposive
interpretation to Section 140 of the Act read with Sections 16 to 21 of the Telangana GST Act 2017. As
he has failed to do the same, the matter requires reconsideration.
• Challenging the rejection of transitional relief in terms of sections 73 and 74 of the Telagnana Goods
and Services Act, 2017 (for short 'the Act') read with Rule 121
• they migrated to the State of Telangana after bifurcation and the amount of total ITC available to
their credit was shown in the Web Portal of the Department as Rs.1,77,65,101/-.
• petitioner claims to have filed all their returns up to 30.06.2017 under the Telangana VAT Act,
2005.
• the petitioner filed TRAN-1 on 07.10.2017 under the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act,
2017 for the transfer of ITC of Rs.1,43,96,486/- available as on 30.06.2017 under the State VAT
Act.
• But, according to the respondents, the State GST Act does not provide for utilization of the 28 NCCF as
transitional relief. Therefore, the second respondent concluded that the Assessing Authority has no such
power beyond what is prescribed by the Statute and that the Dealer is always at liberty to adjust the liabilities
in pending assessments under VAT and CST and thereafter claim refund.
• In the light of the admitted facts reflected even in the impugned order, it is clear that the petitioner is not
making an illusory or stale claim, but is making a claim for something that he is entitled, even according to
the respondents, though in a different form.
• it is not the case of the respondents that the petitioner is claiming something that they are not lawfully
entitled. All that is stated by the second respondent is that while the petitioner may be entitled either to adjust
the available credit against any liabilities under the VAT regime or to claim refund, they are not entitled to
seek transitional relief.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice 218
M/S Magma Fincorp Limited vs State Of Telangana on 15 April, 2019
Issue :- the petition granted where a request is received in writing from the person
submits that the impugned order had been passed without giving an opportunity of
being heard .
Sec-75(4). An opportunity of hearing shall be chargeable with tax or
penalty, or where any adverse decision is contemplated against such person.
Noticed had been issued to assessee under Section 73 for non-payment of
OGST/CGST for period June, 2018 to December, 2018 — However, without
responding to prayer of assessee for time and without giving them an
opportunity of personal hearing, impugned orders were passed, which were
under challenged here.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice 220
M/S SERAJUDDIN AND CO. VS. UNION OF INDIA (HIGH COURT
OF ORRISA) ON 09TH JANUARY 2020
Held, on perusal of Section 75(4) it was cleared that whenever an assessee, chargeable
with tax and penalty makes a request in writing for opportunity of hearing, such an
opportunity should be granted to him — Here, admittedly though a request was made
for personal hearing, however, without granting same impugned orders had been
passed — Hence, impugned order was quashed — Appeal Allowed.
Interpretation-
Here the Order was passed against the assessee however no Opportunity of Heard was
given to assessee and Interest under Section 73 was initiated. Assessee filed a writ
against the High Court and his appeal was allowed.
Conclusion :-
Notice or Order passed without giving an opportunity to assessee is null and void
under the principles of Audi Alteram Partem.
(1) Where any amount payable by a person to the Government under any of the
provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder is not paid, the proper officer
shall
proceed to recover the amount by one or more of the following modes, namely: ––
(a) the proper officer may deduct or may require any other specified officer to
deduct the amount so payable from any money owing to such person which may be
under the control of the proper officer or such other specified officer
(b) the proper officer may recover or may require any other specified officer to
recover the amount so payable by detaining and selling any goods belonging to such
person which are under the control of the proper officer or such other specified
officer.
(c)(i) the proper officer may, by a notice in writing, require any other person from
whom money is due or may become due to such person or who holds or may
subsequently hold money for or on account of such person to pay to the Government
either forthwith upon the money becoming due or being held, or within the time
specified in the notice not being before the money becomes due or is held, so much
of the money as is sufficient to pay the amount due from such person or the whole
of the money when it is equal to or less than that amount;
(ii) every person to whom the notice is issued under sub-clause (i) shall be bound to
comply with such notice, and in particular, where any such notice is issued to a
post office, banking company or an insurer, it shall not be necessary to produce any
pass book, deposit receipt, policy or any other document for the purpose of any
entry, endorsement or the like being made before payment is made, notwithstanding
any rule, practice or requirement to the contrary;
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice 223
Section 79 Recovery of tax
(iii) in case the person to whom a notice under sub-clause (i) has been issued,
fails to make the payment in pursuance thereof to the Government, he shall be
deemed to be a defaulter in respect of the amount specified in the notice and all the
consequences of this Act or the rules made thereunder shall follow;
(iv) the officer issuing a notice under sub-clause (i) may, at any time, amend or
revoke such notice or extend the time for making any payment in pursuance of the
notice;
(v) any person making any payment in compliance with a notice issued under sub-
clause (i) shall be deemed to have made the payment under the authority of the
person in default and such payment being credited to the Government shall
be deemed to constitute a good and sufficient discharge of the liability of such
person to the person in default to the extent of the amount specified in the receipt;
(vi) any person discharging any liability to the person in default after service
on him of the notice issued under sub-clause (i) shall be personally liable to the
Government to the extent of the liability discharged or to the extent of the liability
of the person in default for tax, interest and penalty, whichever is less;
(vii) where a person on whom a notice is served under sub-clause (i) proves to
the satisfaction of the officer issuing the notice that the money demanded or any
part thereof was not due to the person in default or that he did not hold any money
for or on account of the person in default, at the time the notice was served on
him, nor is the money demanded or any part thereof, likely to become due to the
said person or be held for or on account of such person, nothing contained in this
section shall be deemed to require the person on whom the notice has been served to
pay to the Government any such money or part thereof;
Where a person, after any amount has become due from him, creates a charge on or
parts with the property belonging to him or in his possession by way of sale,
mortgage, exchange, or any other mode of transfer whatsoever of any of his
properties in favour of any other person with the intention of defrauding the
Government revenue, such charge or transfer shall be void as against any claim in
respect of any tax or any other sum payable by the said person:
Provided that, such charge or transfer shall not be void if it is made for adequate
consideration, in good faith and without notice of the pendency of such proceedings
under this Act or without notice of such tax or other sum payable by the said person,
or with the previous permission of the proper officer.
(iv) collects any tax in contravention of the provisions of this Act but fails to
pay the same to the Government beyond a period of three months from the date
on which such payment becomes due;
(v) fails to deduct the tax in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (1)
of section 51, or deducts an amount which is less than the amount required
to be deducted under the said sub-section, or where he fails to pay to the
Government under sub-section (2) thereof, the amount deducted as tax;
(vi) fails to collect tax in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (1) of
section 52, or collects an amount which is less than the amount required to
be collected under the said sub-section or where he fails to pay to the
Government the amount collected as tax under sub-section (3) of section
52;
(vii) takes or utilises input tax credit without actual receipt of goods or
services or both either fully or partially, in contravention of the
provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder;
(viii) fraudulently obtains refund of tax under this Act;
(ix) takes or distributes input tax credit in contravention of section 20, or the
rules made thereunder;
(xiii) obstructs or prevents any officer in discharge of his duties under this Act;
(xiv) transports any taxable goods without the cover of documents as may be
specified in this behalf;
(xv) suppresses his turnover leading to evasion of tax under this Act;
(xvi) fails to keep, maintain or retain books of account and other documents in
accordance with the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder
(xvii)fails to furnish information or documents called for by an officer in
accordance with the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder or
furnishes false information or documents during any proceedings under
this Act;
(xviii)supplies, transports or stores any goods which he has reasons to believe
are liable to confiscation under this Act;
• 2. Any registered person who supplies any goods or services or both on which
any tax has not been paid or short-paid or erroneously refunded, or where the
input tax credit has been wrongly availed or utilized,
(a) for any reason, other than the reason of fraud or any willful misstatement
or suppression of facts to evade tax, shall be liable to a penalty of ten
thousand rupees or ten per cent. of the tax due from such person, whichever
is higher;
(b) for reason of fraud or any willful misstatement or suppression of facts to
evade tax, shall be liable to a penalty equal to ten thousand rupees or the
tax due from such person, whichever is higher.
(a) aids or abets any of the offences specified in clauses (i) to (xxi) of subsection (1);
(b) acquires possession of, or in any way concerns himself in transporting, removing,
depositing, keeping, concealing, supplying, or purchasing or in any other manner deals with
any goods which he knows or has reasons to believe are liable to confiscation under this Act or
the rules made thereunder;
(c) receives or is in any way concerned with the supply of, or in any other manner deals with
any supply of services which he knows or has reasons to believe are in contravention of any
provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder;
(d) fails to appear before the officer of central tax, when issued with a
summon for appearance to give evidence or produce a document in an
inquiry;
(e) fails to issue invoice in accordance with the provisions of this Act or the
rules made thereunder or fails to account for an invoice in his books of
account,shall be liable to a penalty which may extend to twenty-five
thousand rupees.
•If a person who is required to furnish an information return under section 150 fails
to do so within the period specified in the notice issued under sub-section (3)
thereof, the proper officer may direct that such person shall be liable to pay a
penalty of one hundred rupees for each day of the period during which the failure
to furnish such return continues:
•Provided that the penalty imposed under this section shall not exceed five
thousand rupees.
•If any person required to furnish any information or return under section 151,
(a) without reasonable cause fails to furnish such information or return as may be required under
that section, or
(b) willfully furnishes or causes to furnish any information or return which he knows to be false,
• he shall be punishable with a fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees and in case of a
continuing offence to a further fine which may extend to one hundred rupees for each day after the
first day during which the offence continues subject to a maximum limit of twenty- five thousand
rupees.
Any person, who contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or any
rules made thereunder for which no penalty is separately provided for in
this Act, shall be liable to a penalty which may extend to twenty-five
thousand rupees.
1. No officer under this Act shall impose any penalty for minor breaches of tax
regulations or procedural requirements and in particular, any omission or
mistake in documentation which is easily rectifiable and made without
fraudulent intent or gross negligence.
Explanation:
(a) a breach shall be considered a ‘minor breach‘ if the amount of tax involved
is less than five thousand rupees;
(b) an omission or mistake in documentation shall be considered to be easily
rectifiable if the same is an error apparent on the face of record.
2.The penalty imposed under this Act shall depend on the facts and circumstances
of each case and shall be commensurate with the degree and severity of the breach.
3.No penalty shall be imposed on any person without giving him an opportunity of
being heard.
4.The officer under this Act shall while imposing penalty in an order for a breach
of any law, regulation or procedural requirement, specify the nature of the breach
and the applicable law, regulation or procedure under which the amount of penalty
for the breach has been specified.
5. When a person voluntarily discloses to an officer under this Act the circumstances of
a breach of the tax law, regulation or procedural requirement prior to the discovery
of the breach by the officer under this Act, the proper officer may consider this fact
as a mitigating factor when quantifying a penalty for that person.
6. The provisions of this section shall not apply in such cases where the penalty
specified under this Act is either a fixed sum or expressed as a fixed percentage.
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where any person transports any
goods or stores any goods while they are in transit in contravention of the provisions
of this Act or the rules made thereunder, all such goods and conveyance used as a
means of transport for carrying the said goods and documents relating to such goods
and conveyance shall be liable to detention or seizure and after detention or seizure,
shall be released,
a) on payment of the applicable tax and penalty equal to one hundred per cent. of the
tax payable on such goods and, in case of exempted goods, on payment of an
amount equal to two per cent. of the value of goods or twenty-five thousand
rupees, whichever is less, where the owner of the goods comes forward for
payment of such tax and penalty;
(b) on payment of the applicable tax and penalty equal to the fifty per cent. of the
value of the goods reduced by the tax amount paid thereon and, in case of
exempted goods, on payment of an amount equal to five per cent. of the value of
goods or twenty-five thousand rupees, whichever is less, where the owner of the
goods does not come forward for payment of such tax and penalty;
(c) upon furnishing a security equivalent to the amount payable under clause (a) or
clause (b) in such form and manner as may be prescribed:
Provided that no such goods or conveyance shall be detained or seized without
serving an order of detention or seizure on the person transporting the goods.
(2) The provisions of sub-section (6) of section 67 shall, mutatis mutandis, apply for
detention and seizure of goods and conveyances.
(3) The proper officer detaining or seizing goods or conveyances shall issue a notice
specifying the tax and penalty payable and thereafter, pass an order for payment of
tax and penalty under clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c).
(4) No tax, interest or penalty shall be determined under sub-section (3) without
giving the person concerned an opportunity of being heard.
(5) On payment of amount referred in sub-section (1), all proceedings in respect of the
notice specified in sub-section (3) shall be deemed to be concluded.
(6) Where the person transporting any goods or the owner of the goods fails to pay the
amount of tax and penalty as provided in sub-section (1) within seven days of such
detention or seizure, further proceedings shall be initiated in accordance with the
provisions of section 130:
Provided that where the detained or seized goods are perishable or hazardous in nature
or are likely to depreciate in value with passage of time, the said period of seven days
may be reduced by the proper officer.
Section :- Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Section 129 of the
Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Detention, seizure and release of goods
and conveyances in transit - Competent Authority detained a vehicle under transport and
goods contained therein and imposed penalty upon assessee (owner of vehicle) for purpose
of release of vehicle and goods in terms of section 129 - Assessee filed writ petition stating
that he was merely a registered owner of vehicle and had nothing to do with goods and as
such he was not liable to pay penalty in terms of section 129(3) - Whether as heading of
section 129 is wide and clear enough to encompass within its fold vehicle in question along
with goods, assessee could not wriggle out of his liability to pay penalty as imposed in
terms of section 129(3) for purpose of release of vehicle
Conclusion:- Registered Owner of Vehicle is liable to pay Penalty in terms of Section
129(3).
(iv) contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder
with intent to evade payment of tax; or
(v) uses any conveyance as a means of transport for carriage of goods in
contravention of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder unless
the owner of the conveyance proves that it was so used without the knowledge
or connivance of the owner himself, his agent, if any, and the person in charge
of the conveyance,then, all such goods or conveyances shall be liable to
confiscation and the person shall be liable to penalty under section 122.
(2) Whenever confiscation of any goods or conveyance is authorised by this Act, the
officer adjudging it shall give to the owner of the goods an option to pay in lieu of
confiscation, such fine as the said officer thinks fit:
• Provided that such fine leviable shall not exceed the market value of the goods
confiscated, less the tax chargeable thereon:
• Provided further that the aggregate of such fine and penalty leviable shall not be less
than the amount of penalty leviable under sub-section (1) of section 129:
• Provided also that where any such conveyance is used for the carriage of the goods or
passengers for hire, the owner of the conveyance shall be given an option to pay in
lieu of the confiscation of the conveyance a fine equal to the tax payable on the goods
being transported thereon.
(3) Where any fine in lieu of confiscation of goods or conveyance is imposed under
sub-section (2), the owner of such goods or conveyance or the person referred to
in sub-section (1), shall, in addition, be liable to any tax, penalty and charges
payable in respect of such goods or conveyance.
(4) No order for confiscation of goods or conveyance or for imposition of penalty
shall be issued without giving the person an opportunity of being heard.
(5) Where any goods or conveyance are confiscated under this Act, the title of such
goods or conveyance shall thereupon vest in the Government.
(6) The proper officer adjudging confiscation shall take and hold possession of
the things confiscated and every officer of Police, on the requisition of such
proper officer, shall assist him in taking and holding such possession.
(7) The proper officer may, after satisfying himself that the confiscated goods
or conveyance are not required in any other proceedings under this Act and
after giving reasonable time not exceeding three months to pay fine in lieu
of confiscation, dispose of such goods or conveyance and deposit the sale
proceeds thereof with the Government.
(d) collects any amount as tax but fails to pay the same to the Government
beyond a period of three months from the date on which such payment
becomes due;
(e) evades tax, fraudulently avails input tax credit or fraudulently obtains refund
and where such offence is not covered under clauses (a) to (d);
(f) falsifies or substitutes financial records or produces fake accounts or
documents or furnishes any false information with an intention to evade
payment of tax due under this Act;
(g) obstructs or prevents any officer in the discharge of his duties under this Act;
(h) acquires possession of, or in any way concerns himself in transporting,
removing, depositing, keeping, concealing, supplying, or purchasing or in any
other manner deals with, any goods which he knows or has reasons to believe
are liable to confiscation under this Act or the rules made thereunder;
(i) receives or is in any way concerned with the supply of, or in any other manner
deals with any supply of services which he knows or has reasons to believe
are in contravention of any provisions of this Act or the rules made
thereunder;
• Shall pe punishable-
(i) in cases where the amount of tax evaded or the amount of input tax credit wrongly
availed or utilized orthe amount of refund wrongly taken exceeds five hundred lakh
rupees, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years and with fine;
(ii) in cases where the amount of tax evaded or the amount of input tax credit wrongly
availed or utilised or the amount of refund wrongly taken exceeds two hundred lakh
rupees but does not exceed five hundred lakh rupees, with imprisonment for a term
which may extend to three years and with fine;
(iii) in the case of any other offence where the amount of tax evaded or the amount of
input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised or the amount of refund wrongly taken
exceeds one hundred lakh rupees but does not exceed two hundred lakh rupees, with
imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year and with fine;
(2) Where any person convicted of an offence under this section is again
convicted of an offence under this section, then, he shall be punishable for the
second and for every subsequent offence with imprisonment for a term which
may extend to five years and with fine.
(3) The imprisonment referred to in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of sub-section (1) and
sub-section (2) shall, in the absence of special and adequate reasons to the
contrary to be recorded in the judgment of the Court, be for a term not less
than six months.
(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,
all offences under this Act, except the offences referred to in sub-section (5)
shall be non- cognizable and bailable.
(5) The offences specified in clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c) or clause
(d) of sub-section (1) and punishable under clause (i) of that sub-section
shall be cognizable and non-bailable.
(6) A person shall not be prosecuted for any offence under this section
except with the previous sanction of the Commissioner.
• Explanation-
For the purposes of this section, the term “tax” shall include the amount of
tax evaded or the amount of input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised or
refund wrongly taken under the provisions of this Act, the State Goods and
Services Tax Act, the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union
Territory Goods and Services Tax Act and cess levied under the Goods and
Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act.
3. Collects the tax but fails to deposit the same with Govt within 3
months of due date.
4. Collects the tax in violation of this Act but fails to deposit the same
with Govt within 3 months of due date
22. Any person who aids or abets any offences u/s 122(1). Up to Rs. 25,000/-
24. Any person who receives or is in any way connected with Up to Rs. 25,000/-
the supply or in any other manner deals with any goods
which know or has reasons to believe are liable to
confiscation under this Act.
25. Any person who fails to appear before the officer on being
summoned.
26. Any person who fails to issue invoice or account for an
invoice in his books of accounts as per the Act.
27. Person covered u/s 150 for failure to furnish information Rs 100 per day per Act subject to
return or willfully furnishing false information return. maximum of Rs. 5000/-
28. Person covered u/s 151 for failure to furnish (statistics) – Rs. 10000/- and
information return or willfully furnishing false information – In case of continuing default, Rs.
return. 100/- per day subject to maximum
of Rs. 25,000/-
29. General Penalty on any person for contravention of any Up to Rs. 25,000/-
provision of this Act for which no separate penalty is
provided for.
Where the owner of goods come Where the owner of goods does not
forward for payment of such tax and come forward for payment of such
penalty, then tax and penalty, then
• (2)The proper officer shall send a copy of the order of attachment or distraint
to the concerned Revenue Authority or Transport Authority or any such
Authority to place encumbrance on the said movable or immovable property,
which shall be removed only on the written instructions from the proper
officer to that effect.
• (3) Where the property subject to the attachment or distraint under sub-rule
(1) is-
a. an immovable property, the order of attachment or distraint shall be affixed on
the said property and shall remain affixed till the confirmation of sale;
b. a movable property, the proper officer shall seize the said property in accordance
with the provisions of chapter XIV of the Act and the custody of the said property
shall either be taken by the proper officer himself or an officer authorised by him.
• (4)The property attached or distrained shall be sold through auction, including e-auction, for
which a notice shall be issued in FORM GST DRC- 17 clearly indicating the property to be sold
and the purpose of sale.
• (5) Notwithstanding anything contained in the provision of this Chapter, where the property to
be sold is a negotiable instrument or a share in a corporation, the proper officer may, instead of
selling it by public auction, sell such instrument or a share through a broker and the said broker
shall deposit to the Government so much of the proceeds of such sale, reduced by his
commission, as may be required for the discharge of the amount under recovery and pay the
amount remaining, if any, to the owner of such instrument or a share.
• (6) The proper officer may specify the amount of pre-bid deposit to be furnished in the manner
specified by such officer, to make the bidders eligible to participate in the auction, which may
be returned to the unsuccessful bidders or, forfeited in case the successful bidder fails to make
the payment of the full amount, as the case may be.
• (7) The last day for the submission of the bid or the date of the auction shall not be
earlier than 15 days from the date of issue of the notice referred to in sub-rule (4):
• Provided that where the goods are of perishable or hazardous nature or where the expenses of
keeping them in custody are likely to exceed their value, the proper officer may sell them
forthwith.
• (8) Where any claim is preferred or any objection is raised with regard to the
attachment or distraint of any property on the ground that such property is not liable to
such attachment or distraint, the proper officer shall investigate the claim or objection
and may postpone the sale for such time as he may deem fit.
• (9) The person making the claim or objection must adduce evidence to show that on the
date of the order issued under sub-rule (1) he had some interest in, or was in possession
of, the property in question under attachment or distraint.
• (10) Where, upon investigation, the proper officer is satisfied that, for the reason stated in the claim or objection, such property
was not, on the said date, in the possession of the defaulter or of any other person on his behalf or that, being in the possession
of the defaulter on the said date, it was in his possession, not on his own account or as his own property, but on account of or in
trust for any other person, or partly on his own account and partly on account of some other person, the proper officer shall
make an order releasing the property, wholly or to such extent as he thinks fit, from attachment or distraint.
• (11) Where the proper officer is satisfied that the property was, on the said date, in the possession of the defaulter as his own
property and not on account of any other person, or was in the possession of some other person in trust for him, or in the
occupancy of a tenant or other person paying rent to him, the proper officer shall reject the claim and proceed with the process
of sale through auction.
• (12) The proper officer shall issue a notice to the successful bidder in FORM GST DRC-11 requiring him to make the payment
within a period of 15 days from the date of such notice and after the said payment is made, he shall issue a certificate in FORM
GST DRC-12 specifying the details of the property, date of transfer, the details of the bidder and the amount paid and upon
issuance of such certificate, the rights, title and interest in the property shall be deemed to be transferred to such bidder:
• Provided that where the highest bid is made by more than one person and one of Themis a co-owner of the property, he shall be deemed to be the
successful bidder.
• (13) Any amount, including stamp duty, tax or fee payable in respect of the transfer of the
property specified in sub-rule (12), shall be paid to the Government by the person to whom
the title in such property is transferred.
• (14) Where the defaulter pays the amount under recovery, including any expenses incurred
on the process of recovery, before the issue of the notice under sub-rule (4), the proper
officer shall cancel the process of auction and release the goods.
• (15) The proper officer shall cancel the process and proceed for re-auction where no bid is
received or the auction is considered to be non-competitive due to lack of adequate
participation or due to low bids.
• Yes. Where any person has become surety for the amount
due by the defaulter, he may be proceeded against under this
Chapter as if he were the defaulter. (Rule 157)
• Yes, a person can request for payment of any amount due under
the Act, other than the amount due as per the liability self-
assessed in any return, in monthly instalments not exceeding 24,
subject to payment of interest under section 50 with such
limitations and conditions as may be prescribed.
• However, where there is default in payment of any one instalment
on its due date, the whole outstanding balance payable on such
date shall become payable and recovered without any further
notice. {sec.80 of CGST Act}
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice 312
In what manner, will the Commissioner deal with a
request for payment of tax and other amounts in
instalments? (Rule 158)
• (1) On an application filed electronically by a taxable person, in FORM GST DRC- 20, seeking extension of time
for the payment of taxes or any amount due under the Act or for allowing payment of such taxes or amount in
instalments in accordance with the provisions of section 80, the Commissioner shall call for a report from the
jurisdictional officer about the financial ability of the taxable person to pay the said amount.
• (2) Upon consideration of the request of the taxable person and the report of the jurisdictional officer, the
Commissioner may issue an order in FORM GST DRC- 21 allowing the taxable person further time to make
payment and/or to pay the amount in such monthly instalments, not exceeding 24, as he may deem fit.
• (3) The facility shall not be allowed where-
a. the taxable person has already defaulted on the payment of any amount under the Act or the IGST/UTGST/SGST
Act(s), 2017, for which the recovery process is on;
b. the taxable person has not been allowed to make payment in instalments in the preceding financial year under
the Act or the IGST/UTGST/SGST Act(s), 2017;
c. the amount for which instalment facility is sought is less than 25,000/- rupees.
• (4) Where the taxable person fails to pay the amount referred to in sub-rule (3) in respect of
the said property of perishable or hazardous nature, the Commissioner may dispose of such
property and the amount realized thereby shall be adjusted against the tax, interest,
penalty, fee or any other amount payable by the taxable person.
• (5) Any person whose property is attached may, within 7 days of the attachment under sub-
rule (1), file an objection to the effect that the property attached was or is not liable to
attachment, and the Commissioner may, after affording an opportunity of being heard to
the person filing the objection, release the said property by an order in FORM GST DRC- 23.
• (6) The Commissioner may, upon being satisfied that the property was, or is no longer liable
for attachment, release such property by issuing an order in FORM GST DRC- 23.
Non-
Revision Appeal
Appealable
S.121 S.108 S.107-120
Assesee ✔️ ❌
Department ✔️ ✔️
Appellate
Appeal by Tribunal State
Appeal by dept Commissioner or Area Bench
Order is Deposit
Deposit Time = 180 days + Extn. and
erroneous +
Prejudicial to (a) 100% of admitted (a) 100% of admitted question of Law
unit revenue (Tax + Int. + Fine + Fee + Penalty) (Tax Int. + Fine + Fee + Penalty)
Question of Law
Revisional Supreme
Court
Authority
(Sec.118)
(Sec.108)
GST APL-02
GST APL-03
GST APL-05
GST APL-06
GST APL-08
Paid 10% of amount which is disputed subject to maximum of Rs.25 Crore Each
Condonation Condonation
Form 107(5) Time limit 107(4) Form 107(5) Time limit 107(4)
107(4) 107(4)
Appeal to Tribunal
• u/s 112 of CGST Act.
• Read with Rule 110,111 and 112
• Within 3+3 months from date of communication
Appeal to High Court
• Read with Rule 114
• u/s 117 of CGST Act
• Within 180 days+ as may be allowed by high court
Appeal to Supreme Court
• u/s 118 of CGST Act
• Read with Rule115
• Within 60 days from date of communication
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
First Appeal against
Adjudication Order
• A person who is aggrieved by a decision or order passed
against him by an adjudicating authority, can file an appeal
to the Appellate Authority.
Any person
aggrieved Any authorised officer
FORM GST APL-01 on direction of the
Commissioner
FORM GST APL-03
Sec 107(4)
The Appellate Authority may, if he is satisfied that the appellant was
prevented by sufficient cause from presenting the appeal within the
aforesaid period of three months or six months, as the case may
be, allow it to be presented within a further period of one month.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Sec 107(5)
Every appeal under this section shall be in such form and shall be verified in such
manner as may be prescribed
Rule 108
Sec 107(6) Pre Deposit –Mandatory
& 109
No appeal shall be filed under sub-section (1), unless the appellant has paid—
(a) in full, such part of the amount of tax, interest, fine, fee and penalty arising
from the impugned order, as is admitted by him; and
(b) a sum equal to ten percent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute arising
from the said order, [subject to a maximum of twenty-five crore rupees,] in
relation to which the appeal has been filed:
“Provided that no appeal shall be filed against an order under sub-section (3) of section 129, unless a
sum equal to twenty-five per cent. of the penalty has been paid by the appellant.”.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Analysis
No fresh
Adjudication
Can enhance
the demand?
Yes
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Provided that an order enhancing any fee or penalty or fine in lieu of
confiscation or confiscating goods of greater value or reducing the amount of
refund or input tax credit shall not be passed unless the appellant has been
given a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against the proposed
order:
Provided further that where the Appellate Authority is of the opinion that
any tax has not been paid or short-paid or erroneously refunded, or where
input tax credit has been wrongly availed or utilised, no order requiring the
appellant to pay such tax or input tax credit shall be passed unless the
appellant is given notice to show cause against the proposed order and the
order is passed within the time limit specified under section 73 or section 74.
Sec 107(13)
The Appellate Authority shall, where it is possible to do so, hear and
decide every appeal within a period of one year from the date on which
it is filed: Provided that where the issuance of order is stayed by an order
of a court or Tribunal, the period of such stay shall be excluded in
computing the period of one year.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Sec 107(14)
On disposal of the appeal, the Appellate Authority shall communicate
the order passed by it to the appellant, respondent and to the
adjudicating authority.
Sec 107(15)
A copy of the order passed by the Appellate Authority shall also be sent to
the jurisdictional Commissioner or the authority designated by him in this
behalf and the jurisdictional Commissioner of State tax or Commissioner
of Union Territory tax or an authority designated by him in this behalf.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Sec 107(16)
Every order passed under this section shall, subject to the provisions of section 108
or section 113 or section 117 or section 118 be final and binding on the parties.
113
Order of Appellate Tribunal
(2) The grounds of appeal and the form of verification as contained in FORM
GST APL-01 shall be signed in the manner specified in rule 26.
Provided that where the certified copy of the decision or order is submitted
within seven days from the date of filing the FORM GST APL-01, the date of
filing of the appeal shall be the date of the issue of the provisional
acknowledgement and where the said copy is submitted after seven days, the
date of filing of the appeal shall be the date of the submission of such copy.
where the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from producing the evidence
prevented by sufficient cause from producing the evidence which he was called
upon to produce by the adjudicating authority or the Appellate Authority
where the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from producing before the
adjudicating authority or the Appellate Authority any evidence which is relevant
to any ground of appeal
where the adjudicating authority or the Appellate Authority has made the order appealed against
without giving sufficient opportunity to the appellant to adduce evidence relevant to any ground of
appeal.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
REVISIONAL AUTHORITY or purposes of Sec
108 [N/N 05/2020 – CT (dated 13-Jan-20)
Principal
JC/Addl. Comm.
Comm./ Comm.
OIO passed by
AC/DC or Sup. JC/Addl. Comm.
OIO is
Process of Revision:
Erroneous
3 a) Operation of “OIO”
Pre-Judicial to Revenue Years stayed
Illegal/Improper/Ignoring
b) Revised – RO passed
Material Facts
• The Revisional Authority can, on his own, or on request from the Commissioner
of SGST/CGST, examine the records of any proceeding. He will examine the
records if he considers that any decision by any subordinate officer is-
Order in Orders in
Original (OIO) Appeal (OIA)
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Section 3 (Administration) – (Officers under CGST Act 2017)
a). Principal Chief Commissioner / Chief Commissioner CGST:- Principal Chief commissioner/ Chief commissioner
are the senior most officer who has administrative control over all the officers within his zone . For the purpose of the Act ,
country is divided in 21 Zones and each zone is under supervision of Principal Chief commissioner or Chief Commissioner of
Central Zone . Senior grade Chief Commissioner will be designated as Principal Chief Commissioner, though both have same
powers
b). Director General – Offices of Director General have been created for monitoring some specified functions ie , DG GST
Intelligence, DG GST Audit Etc .Powers have been delegated to them vide Notification No. 14/2017-CT dated 1-7-2017
c). Principal Commissioner/Commissioner of Central Tax : Notification No 2/2017 –CT dated 19.06.2017 notified 107
Commissionerate's in each 21 Zones and Principal Commissioner/Commissioner of Central Tax is Administrative in-charge of
the Commissionerate's.
d). First Appellate Authority of Central Tax – These are Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals) or Additional Commissioner
of Central Tax (Appeals) or Joint Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals).
e). Commissioner of Central Tax (Audit) The Government vide notification No. 2/2017-CT dated 19-6-2017 has appointed
48 Commissioners of Central Tax (Audit) for the purpose of GST Act.
f). Additional and Joint Commissioners: There are Additional Commissioner/s and Joint Commissioner/s of Central Tax in
each Commissionerate.
g). Deputy Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner and Superintendent – Each Commissionerate is divided into divisions
and each division is under administrative control of ‘Deputy Commissioner of Central Tax’ or ‘Assistant Commissioner of
Private Presentation Central
Only notTax’.
Professional Advice
Time Limit for Revision
• After 6 months
• Upto 3 years
Revision
If the order is stayed by the order of a Court or Tribunal, the period of the stay will be
excluded.
Adjudicating Order
Adjudicating
Order
First Appellate
Commissioner Authority
(Appeals) Place of Supply Other issues
issues
Appellate Tribunal
(CESTAT) Appellate
Appellate
Tribunal
Tribunal
National
For State or
or
High Court Classification Area
Divisional
and Valuation Bench
Bench
Supreme Court
High Court
Supreme Court
• Appeal before the Delhi VAT Tribunal U/s 76 of DVAT Act can be filed by a
person affected by the order of the Commissioner U/s 84 (i.e.
Determination of Question) in the case of third party.
• Ex- The Commissioner determines the matter U/s 84 in the case of M/s
ABC; the appeal can also be filed by M/s XYZ if he is aggrieved from the
said Commissioner’s order. By going through provisions of Sec 74(1) and
84(8), the DVAT Tribunal held that determination orders are binding not
only on the applicant but also to other dealers and the subordinate
officers, thus, are right in rem.
• Thus, the third party can also be considered as person aggrieved.
• C.L. Micromed vs. CIT, 2015 (1487/ATVAT/2012-13 dated 18.02.2015) Tri.-
Delhi
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Adjudicating Authority
• Section 2(4) defines adjudicating authority to mean any authority appointed or
authorized to pass any order or decision under this Act. However, the following are not
covered under the ambit of adjudicating authority:
• Central Board of Customs & Excise
• Revisional Authority
• Authority for Advance Ruling
• Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling
• Appellate Authority
• Appellate Tribunal
Therefore an order passed by an officer other than the revisionary as well as the other
authorities mentioned above could be contested before the Appellate Authority.
From
Available Rate
Date
Pre-Deposits
Mandatory Pre Deposit =AT
Step-I HC shall admit an appeal only in case when he is satisfied that matter
involved Substantial question of Law.
Step-II IF High court is satisfied above that, shall formulate the question and
appeal shall be heard only on formulate question And respondent allowed to
argue that the case does not involve such question.
Step-III HC may determined only those issues which- (a) Has not been
determined by Tribunal, or (b) Has been wrongly determined by Tribunal
Step-IV Case heard by a bench of at least two judges of HC and decide on the
basis of majority of such judges.
Step-V In case of difference of opinion of judges on any point or points that same
shall be forward to additional judge and accordingly decide by majority.
NOTE :- Pre deposit of all tax dues is required to pay otherwise the inherent powers of HC have to be invoked for obtaining a
stay pending disposal of appeal. Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Section 118Appeal to Supreme Court
NOTE:- As per sec. 119, Sums due to govt. as result of an order passed by Tribunal or HC and an appeal has
been preferred to HC or Supreme Court, shall be payable in accordance with the order so passed.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Sec 119
Payment of Due confirmed by AT or HC :- Notwithstanding that an
appeal has been preferred to the High Court or the Supreme Court,
sums due to the Government as a result of an order passed by the
Tribunal or an order passed by the High Court, as the case may be, shall
be payable in accordance with the order so passed by AT or HC.
“An Appeal under any law is an application to a higher court for a reversal of the
decision of a court. Appeals arise when there are any legal disputes.
Disputes arise due to non-compliance of
taxpayer with the provisions under law.
ADJUDICATION ORDER
The initial resolution of this dispute is done by a departmental officer
by a quasi judicial process resulting into the issue of an initial order
known as Adjudication order.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Rights to Appeal
• (CIT v. Bengal Card Board Industries And Printers (P). Ltd. (1989) 176 ITR 193 (Cal), CIT v. Kerala Transport Co. (2000)242 ITR
263 (Ker). In Hoosein Kasam Dada (India ) Ltd vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. (1953) 4 STC 114 (SC) : AIR 1953 SC
221
Right by statute
Notice
Summons
Audit Memos
In Commissioner of Central Excise,Haldia v. Krishna Wax (P.) Ltd. (2020) 77 GST 562 (SC). The Supreme
Court held that an internal order is not a decision or determination and hence can not be appealed
against an order or decision in general parlance refers to any which effects right and liabilities issued
by the department.
• Cancelation of registration
• Tax Not paid, short paid, input tax wrongly availed under section 73 without
willful misstatement of facts or fraud
• Tax Not paid, short paid, input tax wrongly availed under section 74 with
willful misstatement of facts or fraud
• Order of refund
• Rejection of LUT
• Order of provisional assessment, reassessment, summary assessment
▪ “Aggrieved” means one whose pecuniary interest is directly affected by the adjudication, one whose
right of property may be established or divested thereby.”
[‘Advanced Law Lexicon- P. Ramantha Aiyar]
▪ right of appeal to be exercised by the persons permitted by the statute to prefer appeal subject to
conditions regarding filling the appeals.
• Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. vs. CCE- 1983 (13) ELT 974 (Tribunal)
• Rohit Pulp and Paper Mills vs. CCE – 2000 (120) ELT 566 (Tribunal)
• Ahisma Mines and Minerals Ltd. vs. Designated Authority – 2002 (142) ELT 71
(Tribunal)
• Oil Dale Trading Private Ltd. vs. CCE. 1983 (140 ELT 1835 (Tribunal)
Revisional Authority
Appellate Authority
Appellate Tribunal
Anti-Profiteering
PrivateAuthority u/snot
Presentation Only 171(2)*
Professional Advice
Section 120 Appeal not be filed in certain cases
(A) HC In case where Monetary limit has been fixed filing by department
(B) IF Due to monetary limits, if department does not file an appeal in a case then it shall
not preclude that such officer would not be file an appeal for same or similar issue or
question of law in any other case.
(C) Appellate cannot contend that the CGST officer has acquiesced in the decision on
the disputed issues by not filing an appeal or application due to on account of monetary
limits.
(D) Tribunal or court hearing such appeal or application shall have regard to
circumstances for non filing of appeal or application by CGST officer due to on account
of monetary limits.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Section 121 Non appealable decisions and orders
Concerned officer
Can file appeal to
Within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed
against is communicated to the concerned officer.
The appellate shall not be allowed to produce additional evidence EXCEPT in following circumstances
NOTE:-1 Appellate authority or Appellate tribunal shall not be admitted any evidences unless to examine the evidences or
documents or to cross examine any witness produced by appellant.
NOTE:-2 Reasons for admitted evidence to be recorded in writing.
To confirm, modifying, annulling the Refer back the case to Appellate authority or Revisional authority or
decision or order appealed against Adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication after taking additional
which. evidence, if necessary.
On own motion if noticed by Brought to noticed by commissioner Brought to noticed by other party to the
Appellate tribunal or SGST/UTGST commissioner appeal
Appellate Tribunal shall rectify Within a period of 3 months from the date of order
NOTE:- Person disqualified under SGST/UTGST Act shall be deemed to be disqualified under CGST Act.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Section -102 Rectification of Advance Ruling giving by AAR/AAAR
Who such rectification is possible ? If any error exist apparent on the face of the record and
noticed by
Concerned officer or
On applicant who In respect of matter referred for
Jurisdictional officer of the
had sought it. advance Ruling
applicant
Applicant AAR
Submitted a application with fee of Rs. 5,000
Shall issue a copy of
application and call upon him
Examine the validity of application and to furnish required documents
NOTE:-1 If difference in called to application and concerned officer
opinion of AAR members on or these representatives
any point or points, Refer to
AAAR Concerned officer
National or
Place of Supply
Regional
Appellate
Tribunal
Other than
State or Area
Place of Supply
• 6 months from the date on which the said order has been
passed for determination of such points arising out of the said
Time Limit order as may be specified by the Commissioner in his order.
Appeal 3 months from the date of receipt of 6 months from the date of receipt of
the order the order
Any person
aggrieved
FORM GST APL-05 Department
FORM GST APL-07
Annulling
Order by Tribunal
Revisional
Authority
Remand/ Refer
Back Original
Adjudicating
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Authority
Once appeal is accepted what about payment of balance amounts
demanded? Would that be considered as demand stayed?
• Yes, as per Section 107(7) where the appellant has paid the required
pre-deposit, the recovery proceedings for the balance amount shall
be deemed to be stayed.
Appeal 3 months from the date of receipt of 6 months from the date of receipt of
the order the order
Cross-Objection 45 days from the date of receipt of 45 days from the date of receipt of
notice of appeal notice of appeal
Demands
• A sum equal to 25% of the
which are
remaining amount of tax in dispute
arising from the said order shall
contested
have to be remitted.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Whether payment of balance amounts of
demand would be stayed?
• As per Section 112(9) where the appellant has paid the required pre-
deposit (as per Section 112(8)), the recovery proceedings for the
balance amount shall be deemed to be stayed till the disposal of the
appeal.
the hearing?
Annulling
Order by Tribunal
Confirm
Remand/Refer
Back Modify
Annulling
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Question
Framing
Fitment Order
Appellate
Appeal by Tribunal State
Appeal by dept Commissioner or Area Bench
Order is Deposit
Deposit Time = 180 days + Extn. and
erroneous +
Prejudicial to (a) 100% of admitted (a) 100% of admitted question of Law
unit revenue (Tax + Int. + Fine + Fee + Penalty) (Tax Int. + Fine + Fee + Penalty)
Question of Law
Revisional Supreme
Court
Authority
(Sec.118)
(Sec.108)
Additional or Joint Above Rs. 1 Crore Above Rs. 2 Crore Above Rs. 2 Crore
Commissioner
Held:-
The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in W. P. A. 1629 of 2021, dated March 24, 2021
stayed the summons and proceedings thereunder and held that the summons
issued by the Respondent is, prima facie, in violation of Section 6(2)(b) of the
WBGST Act.
Order in SCAORA
Interlocutory Application for
Order in Suo Motu Writ
Order in Suo Motu Writ Petition No. 3/2020 restoration of Suo Motu Writ
Petition No. 3/2020 dated
dated 23.03.2020 (Now alive till further Petition No. 3/2020 dated
08.03.2021 (Now has
orders) 27.04.2021(seems to
become infructuous)
extended the scope of order
dated 23.03.2020)
• This Court has taken Suo Motu cognizance of the situation arising out of
the challenge faced by the country on account of Covid-19 Virus and
resultant difficulties that may be faced by litigants across the country in
filing their petitions/applications/suits/appeals/all other proceedings
within the period of limitation prescribed under the general law of
limitation or under Special Laws (both Central and/or State).
• This order may be brought to the notice of all High Courts for being
communicated to all subordinate Courts/Tribunals within their
respective jurisdiction.
• This order may be brought to the notice of all High Courts for being
communicated to all subordinate courts/Tribunals within their
respective jurisdiction.
• 70. (1) The proper officer under this Act shall have power to summon
any person whose attendance he considers necessary either to give
evidence or to produce a document or any other thing in any inquiry
in the same manner, as provided in the case of a civil court under the
provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 (5 of 1908).
• Judicial bodies are Courts like High Court, District Court or Supreme
Court etc.
• The dictionary meaning of the word quasi is “not exactly” and it is just
in between a judicial and administrative function. It is true, in many
cases, the statutory authorities were held to be quasi-judicial
authorities and decisions rendered by them were regarded as quasi-
judicial
• In Asst. Collector of C. Ex vs. National Tobacco of India ltd. – 1978 (2) ELT
416 (SC), it was held that the assessment of tax on a person or property
is of a quasi-judicial character, therefore, the rules of natural justice have
to be followed and assessment is a quasi judicial process involving due
application of mind to the fats as well as to requirements of law.
The extract of the Hon’ble Supreme order dated 27th April 2021 is reproduced below for reference:
“We, therefore, restore the order dated 23rd March, 2020 and in continuation of the order dated 8th
March, 2021 direct that the period(s) of limitation, as prescribed under any general or special laws in
respect of all judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings, whether condonable or not, shall stand extended
till further orders. It is further clarified that the period from 14th March, 2021 till further orders shall
also stand excluded in computing the periods prescribed under Sections 23 (4) and 29A of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and provisos (b)
and (c) of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and any other laws, which prescribe
period(s) of limitation for instituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or tribunal can
condone delay) and termination of proceedings. We have passed this order in exercise of our powers
under Article 142 read with Article 141 of the Constitution of India. Hence it shall be a binding order
within the meaning of Article 141 on all Courts/Tribunals and Authorities.”
vi) As regards issuance of show cause notice, granting time for replies
and passing orders, the present Orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court
may not cover them even though they are quasi-judicial proceedings
as the same has only been made applicable to matters relating to
petitions/applications/suits, etc
Similarly, appeals which are filed and are pending, can continue to be heard
and disposed off and the same will be governed by those extensions of
time granted by the statutes or notifications, if any
• Appeal be made to both CGST & SGST authorities? –No As per the GST Act, CGST
& SGST/UTGST officers are both empowered to pass orders. As per the Act, an
order passed under CGST will also be deemed to apply to SGST. If an officer under
CGST has passed an order, any appeal /review/revision/ rectification against the
order will lie only with the officers of CGST, vice a versa for SGST.
• Same officer to hear and decide the case The requirement of fair
hearing involves decision being taken by the officer who heard the
case. If after hearing, that particular officer is transferred, normal rule
would be that the successor must hear the arguments afresh before
he could pass an order. Laxmi Devi v. State of Bihar, (2015) 10 SCC
241.So Stringent is this right that it mandates that the person who
heard and considered the objections can alone decide them; and
not even his successor is competent to do so even on the basis of the
materials collected by his predecessor
• M.P. Steel Corporation v. commissioner of Central Excise [2015] 319 ELT 373
(SC) (A.K.SIKRI AND ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, JJ.)
• Time spent in pursuing remedy before wrong forum bona fide would
stand excluded but period prior to institution of initiation of any
abortive preceeding cannot be excluded which is principle which has
been derived from section 14 of the limitation act.
4 GST APL-04 Summary of the demand after the issue of order by the Appellate Authority, Tribunal
or Court
the time limit to apply for revocation of the time limit to apply for revocation the time limit to apply for revocation of
of cancellation of registration stands cancellation of registration stands
cancellation of registration stands extended upto 30th September 2021,
extended upto 30th September 2021, extended upto 30th September 2021, with the extension of timelines by
without any further extension of time by with the extension of timelines by another 30 days beyond 30.09.2021 by
another 30 days beyond 30.09.2021 the Joint/ Additional Commissioner and
Joint Commissioner/ Additional another 30 days by the Commissioner, on
Commissioner/ Commissioner. by the Commissioner, on being being satisfied, as per proviso to section
satisfied, as per proviso to section 30(1) of the CGST Act
30(1)
Privateof the CGST
Presentation Act
Only not Professional Advice
Clarification in respect of applicability
of Dynamic Quick Response (QR) Code
Circular no. 156/12/2021 21st
on B2C invoices and compliance of
June,2020
notification 14/2020- Central Tax
dated 21st March, 2020 - Reg.
Notification No. 14/2020-Central Tax, dated 21st March 2020 had been issued which requires Dynamic QR Code on B2C
invoice issued by taxpayers having aggregate turnover more than 500 crore rupees, w.e.f. 01.12.2020.
Further, vide notification No. 06/2021-Central Tax, dated 30th March 2021, penalty has been waived for non-compliance
of the provisions of notification No.14/2020 – Central Tax for the period from 01st December, 2020 to 30th June, 2021,
subject to the condition that the said person complies with the provisions of the said notification from 1st July, 2021
Clause (ii) of the first proviso to Section 54(3) is not merely a condition of eligibility for
availing of a refund but a substantive restriction under which a refund of unutilized ITC
can be availed of only when the accumulation is relatable to an inverted duty
structure, namely the tax on input goods being higher than the rate of tax on output
supplies. There is therefore no disharmony between Rule 89(5) on the one hand and
Section 54(3) particularly Clause (ii) of its first proviso on the other hand. Explanation
(a) to Rule 89(5) in defining ‘Net ITC’ to mean ITC availed on inputs (goods) is, as a
matter of fact, entirely in line with the main provision, Section 54(3).
Provided also that no refund of input tax credit shall be allowed, if the
supplier of goods or services or both avails of drawback in respect of
central tax or claims refund of the integrated tax paid on such supplies.
Para 40 of
circular
125/44/2019
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Sec. 54 (REFUND OF TAX)
Sec. 2(106) "tax period" means the period for which the
return is required to be furnished;
This point is relevant, as in case of exports the period of two years is to be checked
from relevant date INDIVIDUALLY and when the two or more relevant dates fall
under same tax period then the relevant date from latter should be considered, as
there can be SINGLE application for a Tax period. As per Law applicant can file refund
application at the end of Tax Period only, and the situation is beyond his control. But
in this artificial bunching should be avoided to extend the period of Limitation and
minimum tax period for which refund can be applied should be considered.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
SEC. 2(62) Input Tax
“Input tax" in relation to a registered person, means the central tax, State tax,
integrated tax or Union territory tax charged on any supply of goods or services
or both made to him and includes—
a) the integrated goods and services tax charged on import of goods;
b) the tax payable under the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 9;
c) the tax payable under the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 5 of the
Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act;
d) the tax payable under the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 9 of the
respective State Goods and Services Tax Act; or
e) the tax payable under the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 7 of the
Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act,
but does not include the tax paid under the composition levy;
Explanation (a) to Rule 89(5) of CGST Rules, 2017 which denies the
refund of “unutilized input tax “ paid on “input services” as part of
“input tax credit” accumulated on account of inverted duty structure is
held to be ultravires the provisions of sub section (3) of section 54 of
CGST ACT, 2017
• Clause (ii) of proviso to section 54(3) also deals with both supply of goods and
services and not only supply of goods [Para 23].
• Law in section 54(3) has been wrongly interpreted in Circular No. 79/53/2018
dated 31-12-2018 to deny refund of ITC on input services. [Para 24]
• Explanation (a) to Rule 89(5) which denies refund of unutilized Input tax on input
services is ultra vires the provisions of section 54(3) [Para 25].
• Therefore refund of input services be also allowed under inverted duty structure
[Para 27].
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
• Court drew support from first discussion paper on GST issued by
empowered committee dated 10-11-2009 [Para 16]; International
VAT/GST Guidelines published on Feb 2006 [Para 17]; FAQ on GST
dated 31-03-207 {Para 18].
• Court also drew support from Delhi High Court in Intercontinental
Consultants & Technocrats affirmed by Supreme Court to hold that
rule which goes beyond statute is ultra vires.
• Supreme Court decision in Lohara Steel Industries quoted to lay down
that offending portion which is severable can be struck down.
(4) Section 54(3)(ii) curtails a refund claim to the unutilized credit that accumulates
only on account of the rate of tax on input goods being higher than the rate of tax
on output supplies. In other words, it qualifies and curtails not only the class of
registered persons who are entitled to refund but also the imposes a source-based
restriction on refund entitlement and, consequently, the quantum thereof.
(5) As a corollary, Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules, as amended, is in conformity with
Section 54(3)(ii). Consequently, it is not necessary to interpret Rule 89(5) and, in
particular, the definition of Net ITC therein so as to include the words input services.
• For Penalty -covered under Sec • For Penalty -covered under Sec
122(1) 122(1)
• For Prosecution- under Sec 132 • For Prosecution- under Sec 132
If it is indeed fake and credit is reversed with interest – Intimate the Department
If it is not fake – One can go for Writ Remedy in the High Court
• Question whether reversal=not availed is still a question mark(Partibha Processors, Bombay Dyeing
–
-If assesssee reverses credit on his own without utilising then it will be presumed as never been
taken.)
• For goods you have to submit: E-way Bill, Vehicle No., Toll Receipts , Transport Documents, For
Services, its difficult as it leaves no trail but e.g in advertisement Services, hoarding etc. documents
can be furnished.
• Statements can be cross verified . Statements made under duress can be retracted within reasonable
time of Receipt of copy. Statement made, can be retracted but within a reasonable time as held in
VINOD SOLANKI (SC)(Civil Appeal FEMA matter)- SC says Statement retracted are relevant but
becomes weak and need corroborative Evidences)
• If person alleges that Statement is made under coercion/ duress then it will not be presumed but he
needs to establish.
• It is not mandatory for a person to make statement appearing for the summon. One has a Right of
Silence during Summon proceedings.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Fake Invoicing
Eg. If person has state jurisdiction then center cannot assess. It can
be challenged as violation of Article 14 (Equality Before Law)
• Raj Metal Industries & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors (W.P.A. 1629 OF
2021) Anurag Suri Vs. DGGSIT (WP (c ) no. 158 of 2020)
3. Bail is the rule, not the jail, if a person cooperates even if Cognizable
+ Non Bailable -> No Need to arrest, held in case of Naresh Kumar
Mangla–SC. In Vimal Yashwantgiri Goswami vs. State Of Gujarat
(GHC) -The powers of arrest under section 69 are to be exercised with
lot of care and circumspection. Prosecution should normally be
launched only after the adjudication is completed. To put it in other
words, there must be in the first place a determination that a person is
liable to a penalty. Till that point of time, the entire case proceeds on
the basis that there must be an apprehended evasion of tax by the
assessee.
• In GST ,as with every legislation, this notice is called “show cause notice” and this show cause notice is a
mandatory requirement for raising demands.
• Any other communication, letter, endorsement, suggestion or advisory from tax Department cannot be
considered to be a show cause notice.
• Notice is thus a sine qua non for any demand proceedings and SCN is the one that ‘sets the law in motion’
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
Audi Alteram Partem
The rule of audi alterm partem is a principle of natural justice
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248
• The rule of audi alterm partem mandates of giving the other side an opportunity
of being heard and it was recgnised as a part of article 21 of the constitution
making it a fundamental right available to the citizens by the 7 judge bench of the
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India by Majority decision of J. PN Bhagwati
• Being a fundamental right hence it is available to all assesses and not given a
reasonable opportunity of being heard frustrates the proceedings
2. As per Sec. 108(2)(b) The Revisional Authority shall not exercise any power *1 yr. from date of order in
under sub-section (1), if the period specified under sub-section (2) of section appeal, (or)
107 has not yet expired which is six months from the date of communication
of the said decision. *3 yr. from date of initial
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice order, whichever i later
SEC 161 – Rectification
• Without prejudice to the provisions of section 160, and notwithstanding
anything contained in any other provisions of this Act,
• any authority, who has passed or issued any decision or order or notice or
certificate or any other document,
• may rectify any error which is apparent on the face of record in such
decision or order or notice or certificate or any other document,
• either on its own motion or where such error is brought to its notice by any
officer appointed under this Act or by the affected person
• within a period of three months from the date of issue of such decision or
order or notice or certificate or any other document.
Private Presentation Only not Professional Advice
• Provided that no such rectification shall be done after a period of six months
from the date of issue of such decision or order or notice or certificate or any
other document:
• Provided further that the said period of six months shall not apply in such
cases where the rectification is purely in the nature of correction of a clerical
or arithmetical error, arising from any accidental slip or omission:
• Provided also that where such rectification adversely affects any person, the
principles of natural justice shall be followed by the authority carrying out
such rectification.
Speaking
Order?
Limitation Mode of
Period Service
Pre-SCN
consultation
Proper Officer? Order issues
beyond SCN
Section 73 Section 74
(Other than fraud) (fraud)
Serving by GST
Serving by e-mail
Portal