0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views

CRITERIA

The document outlines a peer evaluation rubric with criteria for assessing participation, quality of contributions, collaboration and teamwork, and preparedness. Each criterion is rated on a scale from 'Excellent' to 'Needs Improvement,' detailing specific behaviors and expectations for each level. Additionally, it includes sections for total scores and attendance tracking.

Uploaded by

Paulo Sagubo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views

CRITERIA

The document outlines a peer evaluation rubric with criteria for assessing participation, quality of contributions, collaboration and teamwork, and preparedness. Each criterion is rated on a scale from 'Excellent' to 'Needs Improvement,' detailing specific behaviors and expectations for each level. Additionally, it includes sections for total scores and attendance tracking.

Uploaded by

Paulo Sagubo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

CRITERIA EXCELLENT GOOD SATISFACTORY NEEDS TOTAL

(10) (7) (5) IMPROVEMENT (3)


Participation Actively Participates Participates Rarely participates or
participates in consistently occasionally, contributions are
all discussions in most but minimal.
and activities. discussions contributions
Regularly and may lack depth
contributes activities. or relevance.
valuable Contributio
insights. ns are
meaningful.
Quality of Contributions Contributio Contributions Contributions are off-
Contributions are thoughtful, ns are are somewhat topic or not
insightful, and relevant and relevant but lack meaningful to the
add value to the generally depth or clarity. discussion.
discussion. enhance the
Demonstrates discussion.
critical thinking Demonstrat
and original es clear
ideas. understandi
ng of the
topic.
Collaboration Works well with Works well Generally works Struggles to work with
& Teamwork others, actively with others, with others but others and may
listens, and listens, and may have disrupt group
contributes to participates difficulty in dynamics.
group tasks. in group collaborating
Supports others’ tasks. effectively.
ideas and Occasionall
encourages y
collaboration. encourages
collaboratio
n.
Preparedness Always comes to Usually Sometimes Frequently
class prepared, comes unprepared, and unprepared for class
having prepared may need or late.
completed with reminders to
readings and readings complete tasks.
tasks. and tasks
completed.
NAME PEER PROPS (20) ATTENDANCE
EVALUATION (50)
(40)

You might also like