Mid-Term 1
Mid-Term 1
Before Romans, there used to be Celts in England so, it is accepted they are the original of the native
English people. Then, England was invaded by Romans and they pushed Celts to other parts of
England such as; Scotland and Wales. After that, Romans withdrawn from England because of the
internal conflicts going on within the Roman Empire. That’s why the Anglo-Saxon period was began.
Anglo-Saxon are Germanic people and they are coming from northern Europe. During the settlements,
Celtic people moved to westwards or northwards. In 177 Ad, Britain was a very small piece compared
to the rest of the Roman Empire. When they were a conflict within the Roman empire, they withdrawn
from in that because England was a very small island and they did not really care they said 'okey we
can withdraw because we need to take care of the rest of Roman Empire.’ The whole Europe was
Roman Empire at that time. Some roads, structures, cities such as; London, Manchester remained from
the Romans. Also, they are the first introduce sanitation water systems within England and they are the
first one to introduce Christianity to England because Roman Empire, Italy is where the Christianity
flourish. They are the introducer of that religion. When they came to England, they came with their
religion and they try to kind of impose introducer to Celtic and to English people. However, there is no
legacy of their language, there is nothing left their language.
ANGLO-SAXON
They are mainly Angles, Saxons, and Jutes. That's where the name England comes
from like Angles. They came from northern Germany, and Denmark. Let's have a look to the
kingdom they established within England.
The Jutes: The Jutes were mainly the Kingdom of Kent.
The Saxon: Saxon were in Wessex Sussex, Essex.
The Angles: Angles were from Northumbria.
Unlike the Romans, the Anglo-Saxons did leave a lasting linguistic imprint on English
literature.
How did they leave the imprint?
Until Norman conquest, English language was mostly influenced by German life by Dutch.
? After the Norman Conquest, it was mostly influenced by French language. There is nothing
similar with Anglo-Saxon English and the Modern English. They are totally different from
each other but we still have in English some Germanic words. and most of the phrasal verbs
‘roots are coming from Germanic, in Dutch. French's words are more formal than the Dutch.
French is more formal than the Dutch. Why?
Gleeman
is the one who memorized poetry and sing songs.
Scope
Mead Hall
English poetry like Beowulf and anything epic, they are going to take place within the
Mead Hall. This is the setting where they come together, celebrate, sing, eat. This is a
community gathering place so, it is very important place for Anglo-Saxon to Mead Hall.
In Anglo-Saxon period, most of the literature took place within the Mead Hall. This is also
King residence. It is a kind of a sight of communal activities. This was also the place where
they were sighted. Mead Hall where people came together and everyone was sighting
something, singing songs because there was no TV, there was no movie, they needed it
something to entertainment themselves and pass time. That's why it was the main
entertainment of those days.
THANES
Thanes are the lords of King and the most important thing that were expected from
them or we expected from subject of the King, he is to be loyal to the King, to obey his
commands. There is a line of kinship to founders of the tribe and all their values reflected
heroic acts. As long as you are heroic acts, as long as brave you are considered the good man.
If you are not like that, you are nothing.
Why?
Because in order to survive they needed to be so. This was the time where they needed
? to brave, fight against to invaders, against the nature, against the animals. They need to be
protected themselves because there is no one protect them against to invaders, nature,
animals.
King Alfred The Great: He is very important because he was really into literature. He said
culture is very important. He translated many books from Latin to English of his time. That's
why we kind of contributed to them Anglo-Saxon culture. he kind of helper Anglo-Saxon
culture to establish.so he is a very important figure of his time.
- Romans brought Christianity but they lived between 50-400. With Romans,
Christianity came, they just wanted to established it but they gone back so,
Christianity went back with them. Then, there was an Anglo-Saxon period from 450 to
? 11th century who are pagans. That's why with the arrival of the Saxons, Jutes and
Angles, most of the country had once again reverted to paganism and there was no
more Christians in England because Anglo-Saxons were not Christianists.
- To convert the pagan Anglo-Saxons to the Christian faith, Rome sent St
Augustine to England in 6th century. Like they withdrawn from England but they
realized that there were some people there, needed to take care of them and needed to
send someone there. So, they could convert them back to Christianity.
- The story of St Augustine’s arrival in England has become the stuff of legend, and was
first told by the 8th-century monk and historian Bede. We learn all these stories of England by
Bede, by Ecclesiastical History of the England. Most of the knowledge that we have, all
Anglo-Saxon people comes from Bede, from his writings. His writings told us that St
Augustine comes and established Christianity one more time in England. The reason
Canterbury is the place of the pilgrim, because the first St Augustine goes there and he
became the first Archbishop of Canterbury. It is the place of pilgrims.
Why do you think that most of the kennings are about the sea and wars?
Because that's the topic of the literature. They are talking about the wars and
sea because they are surrounded by sea.
? Why do you think they write poems using these features?
In order to memorize and to facilitate because when you start with the same
consonant, you know that it comes with the same consonant.
In most of the poems, it is seen that they are about nature. However; the way they are
talking about the nature is not in a positive way. They are mostly talking in negative way
because it's frightening, it's rainy, cold, foggy. There is nothing to like it and the nature is a
place to be frightened of. Anglo-Saxon people always described the nature in a very negative
way. However, it changed after the Norman conquest and spread of Christianity.
Why do you think so?
They were living in the horror of going nowhere. They questioned ‘When ı die,
what's going to happen?’ That's the way to fear from human being. They wanted to
know what was going to happen to them when they died. That’s why it was create the
? irritation, discomfort. However; with the coming of Christianity, the idea 'afterlife'
came and they knew that they were going to a better place and knowing that there was
heaven of have makes them perceive nature or what's happening on them in a more
peacefully way. Before Christianity, they were more worried, everything was
dreadful, there was fear in everything but After Christianity, there was more peace in
what they were doing.
Literary Genres
Epic: Beowulf - And also, there is
riddles, translations vs.
Elegy: The Wanderer
- They are mostly
History: Ecclesiastical History religious things and pure
translation from that.
Lyric-Dream vision: The Dream of the Rood
? •
•
Find an example of kenning?
How many narrators are there?
There are 2 narrators Cross/Rood and Dreamer
• Why did they describe Christ as a warrior?
The Anglo-Saxons were a warlike people, and all they knew in life was war.
Therefore, in order for them to accept Jesus as their leader, he had to be depicted as a
warrior. Also, this was something that was related to their culture. In addition,
according to them, in order for a person to be sublime, he must be a warrior.
• How is the cross described?
• How do we understand that Christ is a warrior?
Cemanur Aygül
Afife Sena Dana
Week II
Let's have a look to the language that opens The Wife's Lament.
- The language that opens “The Wife’s Lament” situates the poem and its speaker in the
context of the traditional heroic elegy of exile; in particular, her opening line, [I recite
this song about myself, very mournful], closely resembles the opening lines of “Deor,”
“Resignation,” and “The Husband’s Message
- She sings under an oak tree; a common Old English poetic metaphor for the cross
- The speaker’s language is the cultural expression of female monasticism: like a
nun at matins singing the office under the cross (and thus lamenting her Lord), this
speaker laments the loss of her lord, under a tree.
full of sorrow... she talks about herself within eye. this is something very important in
literature because she becomes the object her own writing. she doesn't want to ...narration by
she writes in the first-person narration. That's her own narrative and she becomes the eye
the .. of the story and that also indicates some kinds of power of her. she is not that kind of
unpowerful women. She has some power over her life because she tells the story in the first-
person narration. She said 'ı shall make this song about me. My own fate. like the warrior she
is telling her life. Her life is wordy of telling. In order to tell your life, it needs to be worthy of
telling, wordy of narrative. When you compare with to the warrior life, when you are warrior,
you can talk about your heroic act because it's wordy of telling. but this is all about sorrow
and she says 'ı am going to talk about my own fate.'
Where she lives?
She lives in a cave. The earth cave may be literally a natural or man-made cave.
? “Grave” imagery is appropriate for a female religious, dead to the world socially and
restricted from it physically. In literary says, it can become a real cave and she might be living
in it or symbolically because she is kind of cast away from her husband from her community,
she is kind of living in a separate environment and that become a symbolic cave for her.
STRUCTURE:
The narrator is the woman. It is a monologue because she speaks to herself within eye, and
she records the lament of an exiled wife. The first lines, prologues or the opening lines are the
very important to establish the tone and theme of the poem. You get the tone whole things.
That's we going to go on practice poem from the first lines. That's why the very important to
analyse in order to get the whole..
- Lines 1-5 establish the tone and theme of the poem, as the wife describes her exiled
state and sorrowful mood.
- Lines 6-14 describe the events responsible for the separation of the husband and wife.
She describes why she might be separated.
- From lines 15-27 emphasize the contrast between the previous bliss and present
sadness in the exiled wife's relation to her husband.
- Beginning with line 27, the wife's passion increases as she describes the unpleasant
environment she must live in (11. 27-41),
- And then later on, she curses the person responsible for her anguish -prison stayed-
(11. 42-4711),
- In the end, she concludes with a further description of an exile's physical and spiritual
torment.
With the last line, we can see that ....
Themes:
- Sorrow/Depression, Loneliness/Solitude, Exile are the main themes of the
poem.
Narrator:
- It is the first-person narration and it is a monologue.
Literary Devices:
- Kennings, Alliteration, Caesura, Assonant
- So, warriors were dependent on their lords for protection and provisions. The loss of a
master could bring great despair and financial insecurity.
- His lord has died. That means he has no more purpose, no more friends, no more
hopes of enjoying treasures, no one to feast with, and no one’s knee upon which to lay
his hand and promise loyalty because promise loyalty is the essence of their life. If
you lose your essence of life, there would no purpose of living.
- He is alone, cast out, left to wander in search of a new lord. Here we have also the
gender differentiation with women. He is cat out because her husband ..... against him
and she is exiled.....
Christianity: Fate is a very complicated thing because we are going to see that fate is also
very prominent within pagan understanding. In paganism, you should also except your life as
it is you can't question it because….He accepts that his life with his lord a friend is over, and
that he will never find such friends or sense of belonging again.
Grim, fatalistic worldview: The wanderer realizes that everything earthly is fleeting and
seeks “mercy/ From his heavenly Father.” The wanderer expresses a contentment with fate
and an appreciation for the wisdom that comes through experience, and that’s very Christian
because with the experience of suffering .... Here as well, the wisdom comes from the suffer,
which are in keeping with Anglo-Saxon values of accepting one’s destiny and proving oneself
in acts of courage and bravery.
*The Wanderer” is considered as a “Bildung” lyric, and also it is a poetic account of
spiritual growth because he is left alone, he is cast out, and he is left with nothing. That's why,
he just become the wanderer but there is a spiritual growth in it.
? 2- Describe the mood and emotions of the poems and explain why the narrator
of the poem feels that way.
3- Why are these elegies?
It is a common theme of that time. It’s like an intro Anglo-Saxon poetry the depressing mood
because of that, these elegies are also in a depressive mood. The early Anglo-Saxons lived in
small, closely knit groups, the members of which were generally related by blood. Life was
harsh, and someone who was cut off from the group or made an outcast would have difficulty
surviving on their own. That's one the biggest problem of their lives. Being cast out, being
outside of the society or losing their society because firstly, the life is harsh and you cannot
really live on your own, you need a community to live in. Secondly, essence of life is to be
loyalty to your king. There are many poems about wandering about exile because these are
sorrow of these people. These are the pain that they enduring during this time, these are the
main problem of these people.
Most of the English poems that have come down to us celebrate to ties to the family, king, and
the trail. Many deals with the consequences of being cut off. We are an Anglo-Saxon period
where the family ties are very close and the traits that we are talking are related to each other
by blood. The essence of life is being loyal to your King and the essence of being King is
being generous to his people. So, when you lose the essence of your life, there is no purpose
of living. Secondly, emotional state but this is based also physical thing meaning that if you
are on your own you are, you can’t live. You need your people support to live in.
They all mourn the loss of a place, person, or the end of an era and express a sorrowful tone.
Also, theme Exile brings intense emotional anguish and loneliness. As elegy, we see that Old
English Literature confronts human mortality and the transience of this world. Temporal
World sufferings are recompensed by a higher, eternal World. Elegy is like they confront
mortality and human life is very short.
in their breast-coffer with restraint. nor must he ever be too hot tempered, nor too hasty of
speech
So I, miserably sad, separated from homeland,
nor too weak in battles, nor too heedless,
far from my noble kin, had to bind my thoughts with
fetters, nor too fearful, nor too cheerful, nor too greedy for
wealth
since that long ago the darkness of the earth
nor ever too eager for boasting before he knows for
covered my gold-friend, and I, abject, certain.
proceeded thence, winter-sad, over the binding of the A man must wait, when he speaks a boast,
waves.
until, stout-hearted, he knows for certain
Sad, I sought the hall of a giver of treasure,
whither the thought of the heart may wish to turn.
Where I might find, far or near,
The prudent man must realize how ghastly it will be
one who in the meadhall might know about my people,
when all the wealth of this world stands waste,
or might wish to comfort me, friendless,
as now variously throughout this middle-earth
entertain with delights. He knows who experiences it
walls stand beaten by the wind, covered with rime,
how cruel care is as a companion, snow-covered the dwellings.
to him who has few beloved protectors. The wine-halls go to ruin, the rulers lie
The path of exile awaits him, not twisted gold, deprived of joy, the host has all perished
frozen feelings, not earth’s glory. proud by the wall. Some war took,
he remembers retainers and the receiving of treasure carried on the way forth; one a bird carried off
how in youth his gold-friend over the high sea; one the gray wolf shared
accustomed him to the feast. But all pleasure has with Death; one a sad-faced nobleman
failed.
buried in an earth-pit.
Indeed he knows who must for a long time do without
So the Creator of men laid waste this region,
the counsels of his beloved lord
until the ancient world of giants, lacking the noises
when sorrow and sleep together
of the citizens, stood idle.
often bind the wretched solitary man–
He who deeply contemplates this wall-stead,
he thinks in his heart that he
and this dark life with wise thought,
embraces and kisses his lord, and lays
old in spirit, often remembers long ago,
hands and head on his knee, just as he once at times
a multitude of battles, and speaks these words:
in former days, enjoyed the gift-giving.
“Where is the horse? Where is the young warrior?
Then the friendless man awakes again, Where is the giver of treasure?
sees before him the dusky waves, Where are the seats of the banquets? Where are the
the seabirds bathing, spreading their wings, joys in the hall?
frost and snow fall, mingled with hail. Alas the bright cup! Alas the mailed warrior!
BACKGROUND
1- What are the events that taking place and what is the structure? (Structure = Olay
örgüsü)
- The rise of the Danish nation
- There are three major battles that Beowulf fights against: with Grendel, Grendel’s
? mother, and the Dragon.
- The first battle is between the Grendel and Beowulf. He fights for fame and to
prove his bravery by defeating the monster.
- The second battle is between Beowulf and Grendel’s mother. Grendel’s mother
attacked the mead hall to take a revenge on the death of her son, Grendel.
- The last battle is between Beowulf and the dragon that occurs after fifty has
? passed. Fortunately, they were able to defeat the dragon but Beowulf faced the
death.
2- Are Below and Beowulf the same person?
- They are different person. Below is the son of Shield Sheafson and father of
Halfdane, and Beowulf is a warrior.
3- What are the motivations for Beowulf to fight Grendel?
? - Revenge, Loyalty. She wants to take revenge for the men Grendel's had killed. He
wants glory, pride, fame. display of strange and kind of he is the best warrior in
those times.
4- Is it about Anglo-Saxon people?
- No, it is not. It is about… Actually; this is about Anglo-Saxons but they are
ancestors. This is about the ancestors of Anglo-Saxon people. It is not about they
were living in England but it is about what they were living back in their original
homeland.
? 5- What does the prologue serve?
- It gives us background information about the poem. Opening lines, and prologues
are very important because they give the moods. They are talking about their
ancestors and settle the mood for the whole poem.
Summary of Beowulf:
Hrothgar is the King of the Danes in southern Denmark. Through success in battle, he
has become rich and mighty. As a symbol of his power and prosperity he builds a magnificent
mead-hall, called Heorot. The joy of people in the mead hall angers Grendel (Grendel, a
monster descended from Cain) -Cain: The Old Testament of the Bible, in the Book of Genesis, tells
the story of how Cain killed his brother Abel. Cain was marked by God, so others would know him and
cast him out of society- Grendel repeats his nightly raids until no one dares sleep in the hall.
Heorot, once the symbol of greatness, is now a place of shame and terror for 12 years.
Beowulf struggles with Grendel, tearing off the monster's shoulder and arm. Grendel
returns to the fens to die. His arm is hung as a trophy under the roof of Heorot. That
night, Grendel's mother comes to the hall from her home in the bottom of a lake, seeking
revenge for the death of her son. Beowulf enters the lake, and swims for hours before
reaching her cave at the bottom. He fights with Grendel's mother. Beowulf seizes a sword
forged long ago by giants and kills Grendel's mother. He sees Grendel's body, and removes the
head, and takes it and the hilt of the giant's sword back to Hrothgar.
Beowulf and his men return to the land of the Geats His uncle the king, Hygelac is
eventually killed by the Swedes; his son Heardred, though young, takes the throne with
Beowulf's support. At Heardred's death, Beowulf takes the throne of the Geats, and rules in
great prosperity and fame for fifty years. In Beowulf's old age, a thief finds a passageway into
an old barrow and steals a cup. but the dragon discovers the theft and burns the land,
including Beowulf's mead-hall. Beowulf sets out to confront the dragon. He kills the dragon,
but not before he himself is terribly wounded.
Watch it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrm3PJjD7gU
Mead Hall is a very important place. It is constructed by the King a sign of the favour
for their people. While they were constructing their Mead Hall, they are created a space where
eat together, celebrate together, come together, which is very important for Anglo-Saxon
people. In those days, that was the only place to socialize and to come together. That's why
everything takes place in the Mead Hall -Also, it is called as Heorot.-. And then, that makes
Grendel unhappy and angry so he attacked. The problem with Grendel, he was the monster
descended from Cain. -that's a biblical allusion-. That's why they are evils, monsters. If you
read it from a philosophical view, there is nothing Grendel to be angry because he is cast out.
In Anglo-Saxon period, when you are cast out, there is nothing you can do. We can
understand why Grendel attacked. While the people were happy together, he could be kind of
envy of them. That's why he killed them. 25:30…..
Characters: There are many characters in it. Let’s look at the main characters;
Beowulf: A Geatish warrior,
Hygelac: Geatish king,
Hrothgar: The King of the Danes, the son of Halfdene (Beow-Shield),
Grendel: A man-eating monster descended from the Biblical Cain,
Grendel’s mother: A female version of Grendel, also descended from Cain.
Themes:
Family and Tribe, Heroic Code, Good versus Evil, Fame and Pride, Death and defeat:
Repetition, Christianity and Paganism.
Analysis of passages:
Death:
Beowulf is battling the Devil and even though he can’t defeat him (because only God can), he
stands against the greatest evil bravely. So, even he dies soon thereafter, he dies as a virtuous
man loved by God and can be remembered and praised. -Just like Christ- All mortal men
Beowulf is destined to die, but the death doesn’t matter, the faith and virtuous life does.
Praising Mother:
While the mother of Christ in the Bible is blessed, ‘‘Blessed is the womb that bore you, and
the breasts that you sucked!" (Luke 11: 27) in the same way Beowulf’s mother is blessed.
Also, when Beowulf is praised;
Whoever she was
Who brought forth this flower of manhood.
If she is still alive, that woman can say
That in her labor the Lord of Ages
Bestowed a grace on her. (941-945)
12 men= 12 Apostles:
Beowulf gathers a squad of his twelve most trusted and brave warriors. This situation
mirrors the episode from the New Testament and one of the most straightforward examples of
Christian allegory: the Beowulf’s squad represents the twelve Apostles that Christ has.
Paganism:
Most of the Pagan elements are accredited to the idea of what Norse Paganism was. Of
course, they are so many about their ancestors who comes from Germanic tribes and we know
that they used to be pagan before coming England. So, in Christianity virtues were influenced
in that later on. That's kind of impossible not to see any pagan element in it. There should be
some pagan elements. Wyrd is a concept in Anglo-Saxon culture roughly corresponding to
fate or personal destiny. “Fate goes ever as fate must.” (455), “Often, for undaunted courage,
fate spares the man it has not already marked.” (572-573).
Beowulf’un Özeti:
Başlangıcında Dan kralı Hrothgar'ın kırlar üzerindeki görkemli konağı Heorot'un, 12 yıl
boyunca kötü ruhlu canavar Grendel'in gece baskınlarına uğradığı, canavarın Hrothgar'ın
savaşçılarını kaçırıp yediği anlatılır. Beklenmedik bir anda, İsveç'in güneyindeki Geat
kabilesinin genç prensi Beowulf, adamlarıyla birlikte çıkagelir ve Heorot'u canavardan
kurtarmayı önerir. Kral, adı pek duyulmamış bu prensin cesaretine hayret eder, ama onu iyi
karşılar. Kralın maiyetindeki bazı kişilerin kıskançlığı dışında gerekli görgü kurallarına uygun
geçen bir akşam şöleninden sonra kral yatmaya gider, yerine Beowulfu bırakır. O gece
kırlardan Grendel gelir, ağır kapılan yıkar, Beowulf'un kabilesinden birini yer. Sonra Beowulf
la boğuşur, ama onun güçlü ellerinden kaçamaz, kurtulmak için hamle yaparken bir kolu
kopar. Sonunda kaçmayı başarır, ama ölümcül bir yara almıştır.
Ertesi gün Heorot'ta şenlik vardır, ama geceleyin savaşçılar uyuyunca Grendel'in annesi
oğlunun öcünü almak için gelir, Hrothgar'ın adamlarından birini öldürür. Sabahleyin de
Beowulf onu bir bataklığın dibindeki mağarasında bulup öldürür. Grendel'in başını
gövdesinden ayırarak Heorot'a döner. Danlar bir kez daha şenlik düzenler. Hröthgar gerçek
kahramanları öven bir uğurlama konuşması yaptıktan sonra Beowulf kazandığı onur ve aldığı
değerli armağanlarla Geat kralı Hygelac'ın yanına döner.
İkinci bölümde Kral Hygelac'ın, tarihsel belgelerin de doğruladığı bir savaş sırasında
ölmesi, oğlunun ölümü, Beowulf'un krallığa getirilişi ve 50 yıl ülkeyi barış içinde yönetmesi
anlatılır. Bu kez de ağzından alev püskürten bir ejder ülkeye saldırınca cesur, ama yaşlanmış
Beowulf onunla mücadeleye girer. Gençliğinde tutuştuğu dövüşlerin tersine bu kez korku ve
acı veren uzun bir çatışma olur. Genç yardımcısı Wiglaf dışında bütün askerlerinin kralı terk
etmesi de acı vericidir. Beowulf ejderi öldürürse de ölümcül bir yara alır. Şiir, kralın cenaze
ayiniyle, ağıtlarla son bulur.
The Wanderer:
https://www.gradesaver.com/exeter-book/study-guide/summary-the-wanderer
Beowulf:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nS6QC4z_Pb4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FfkN_USdcc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek-StkqXZkY
WEEK III
MEDIAVAL ENGLISH LITARATURE
Geoffrey of Monmouth:
The chief writer of history of the kings of Britain is Geoffrey of Monmouth -he has
written in Latin-. Geoffrey of Monmouth gathered together several strands of King Arthur myth
and history and retold the stories in a medieval fashion. Also, one of the most important things
of Geoffrey of Monmouth is that he is the one retelling King Arthur stories. So, when you
look at the King Arthur stories, there are some entries saying that it was invented by Geoffrey.
No, it was not invented by Geoffrey but it was re-written, it was kind of covered by Geoffrey
so, his two important works the history of Kings of Britain. However; it was not written in
English unfortunately and re-writing of King Arthur.
Language Middle English (twelve hundred to fourteen hundred / It is the Chaucer time)
Language is mostly French: While the French was principally the language of parliament,
law, business, and high culture during 13th and 14th centuries, English was the language of
peasants. But English was gaining ground.
Why?
Because of the 100 Year's war. And also, they were using English in order to reach peasantry
as well because peasantry or lower classes did not know how to read or write in French and in
Latin. In order to reach people those people, they needed to write in English as well. That’s
why several religious works have been started to written in English. Several authors of
religious Works were writing for the benefit of those who do not know French and Latin.
Background Information:
In between 12th and 14th centuries, there was a (Bubonic)plague, black death, and it
wiped out almost a third of population. Actually, prevalent -diseases- existed throughout the
Middle Ages, but it was the most devastating during the 14th century. That's why, there was
almost no one left to work. As a result of this, scarcity of labour occurred. Then, it led to that
enforcing wage controls and oppressive new taxes. And, church became the target of popular
discontent. Why? Because church was among the greatest of the oppressive landowners
(wealthy, worldliness, venality). While the people were getting poorer, the church was very
rich. It contradicts their basically system because they say that everything on this earth is to
do good so, we can reach to heaven. what the hell are you doing? Also, there were 100 years’
war, and War of Roses.
Other Influential Writers:
William Langland: In his writings, he attacked the corruption at the church.
John Gower:
Julian of Norwich: She is the first known woman writer, visionary writing in England.
Margery Kempe: She writes religious works. Her writings are very important because
she shows us medieval church from female point of view.
Geoffrey Chaucer
He lived between 1343 and 1400 and his father was a wine maker. It means that he
was growing in middle class so, he was not noble. -Nobility comes with birth, you cannot earn it.
You can just be a noble if your father or your mother is noble- He served Edward III and Richard II
and in the 100 years’ war, he was captured -Edward III paid the ransom to get him released - He
knew English, French, Latin and Italian because he was a diplomat and travelled around the
whole Europe. If you go Westminster abbey, there is a poet corner and Chaucer is there.
Could he make his living as a writer?
Not really. So, he worked in many royal posts. Like he worked as royal page to a knight, he
was courtier diplomat travelling through Europe as an emissary for the king and he served as
a civil servant.
He influenced by Dante (1265-1321), Francis Petrarch (1304-1374), and Giovanni
Boccaccio (1313-1375). They were the founding fathers of the renaissance.
So, how was Chaucer influenced by these writers?
Because he was travelling constantly and knew how to speak Italian. It is unclear if they had
met him in person but they were living in Italy when he was in Italy as well.
He wrote a great deal of poetry throughout his adult life for amusement for
pleasure but also as a way of making money as part of this patronage system. As part
of patronage system; Wealthy nobleman would pay artists to create Works for their
private collection. For instance; they go and say 'Chaucer write me a book so, I can
add it my private collection.' Because it was one of the best things to pass time in
those days.
HIS WORKS:
DREAM VISION COURTLY POETRY SHORT LYRICS TRANSLATIONS
*The Book of the Troilus and Criseyde
Duchess -a romance tale set
during Trojan War-
*The Parliament of *The Knight’s Tale
Fowles -satire of
political governance-
*The House of Fame
*The Legend of Good
Women
Diversity:
He wrote in many different kinds of forms and genres. His works were spiritually
focussed: They were also focusing on intellect and desire, and they were serious and
playful.
Spiritually focussed means that allusion to the bible and the Church Fathers,
especially in translations and in the dream vision, because he was a Christian and there
were references from Bible and Church Fathers.
Intellect and desire mean that the nuances of the philosophical debates of his
time, but also focuses on lower passions to which humans are subject.
Serious and playful means that important life lessons mixed with element of
mere entertainment or play. There are so many ironies within his works. These are the
important aspects of his works.
Canterbury Tales
It is about a group of pilgrims who meet at Tabard Inn.
There is a challenge was set for them: each pilgrim: 4 stories: 2 on the way to
the cathedral 2 on their way back to London.
The most important thing within these Chaucer stories that there are people
from all walks of life different classes weaving together different genres and
characters. This is not just about nobility, there are people from all worlds of life and
there is a mixture of people so that's very important. The frame of pilgrimage is
served to mix people actually and it is a very significant.
He is weaving together different genres and characters.
There are 24 stories written in middle English narrative runs 17.000 lines.
In total, a journey to visit the shrine of St Thomas Beckett.
The whole stories focused on lower/ middle/ upper classes.
Chaucer moved between classes freely showing favouritism to none of them
because he criticized all worlds of life, all worlds of classes.
Boccaccio Influence:
He has been influenced by some intellectual writers and one of them is Boccaccio’s
Decameron. Canterbury tales was also influenced by Boccaccio’s Decameron.
In the story, there are nobility. First of all, the differences of the nobility. In
Boccaccio's story, the nobility flees from Florence to escape the black death and they go to
isolated villa and they spend nights and days together. So, they can be same from the plague.
They go to isolated villa and they spend nights and days together. so, they can be same from
the plague. In order to pass the days, each member of the party tells a story each night. So, the
frame narrative of telling in order to pass time telling stories to each other is the frame
narrative and it is very... of Boccaccio’. but also, there is another story coming from middle-
east, which is also has the same frame word, One thousand one nights -Arabian Nights-.
There are differences in the design.
While Boccaccio’s characters flee from Florence and the plague, In Chaucer,
they go on a journey to Canterbury. They don't flee London, they don't run away from
London..
While another big difference is that Boccaccio’s characters are all of the
nobility, in Chaucer, there are all worlds of class.
Themes:
Gender relations religion,
Sexual immorality anti-semitism,
Critiques
Whan that Aprill with the members
his shoures soote of nobility, clergy and peasantry,
11 (So priketh hem Nature in hir corages),
withUse
When April satire to call attention
its sweet-smelling showers to the hypocrisy. (So Nature incites them in their hearts),
2 ThePrologue:
droghte of March hath perced to the roote, 12 Thanne longen folk to goon on pilgrimages,
Has pierced the drought of March to the root, Then folk long to go on pilgrimages,
3 And bathedevery veyne
It starts
in with
swichthe famous description
licour 13 of spring,
And palmeres for to seken straunge strondes,
everyPrologue
And bathed vein (of thebecomes the
plants) in framed
such liquid narrative. And
It provides us the whole kind of
professional pilgrims to seek foreign shores,
4 structure
Of which vertu of theis the
engendred narrative
flour; because it introduces us the characters, what's going to
14 To ferne halwes, kowthe in sondry londes;
By whichhappen,
power the and everything
flower is created;that we should knowToabout the background story of
distant shrines, known in various lands;
5 Canterbury
Whan Zephirus eek withtales.
his sweete breeth 15 And specially from every shires ende
There
When the West Wind also is much
with itsemphasising
sweet breath,in the prologueAnd on the clothing ... we can interpret
specially from every shire's end
6 theincharacters,
Inspired hath every holtanalyse
and heeth the characters.
16 Of Engelond to Caunterbury they wende,
In everywood andWithin thebreathed
field has prologue we are introducing the weaknesses -vanity, Greed,
life into Of England to Canterbury they travel,
7
Gluttony-. So, his ...start from the prologue.
The tendre croppes, and the yonge sonne 17 The hooly blisful martir for to seke,
The tender new leaves, and the young sun To seek the holy blessed martyr,
8 Hath in the Ram his half cours yronne, 18 That hem hath holpen whan that they were seeke.
Has run half its course in Aries, Who helped them when they were sick.
9 And smale foweles maken melodye,
And small fowls make melody,
10 That slepen al the nyght with open ye
Those that sleep all the night with open eyes
It's completely different from what Churches wrote. While he is praising winter, he describes
spring as bad. At the same time, he uses it in a great irony when he is praising winter.
‘‘Winter kept us warm, covering
Earth in forgetful snow,’’
This is all about the nature. How the nature comes to life, how everything is
awakening, and the joy of April.
Reflections on Modernism:
T.S. Eliot one of the most modernist writers, inverts the Chaucer’s use of spring
and he writes that in The Waste Land, one of the most important poems in
modernism.
April is the cruellest month, breeding ull roots with spring rain.
Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing Winter kept us warm, covering
Memory and desire, stirring D Earth in forgetful snow, feeding
A little life with dried tubers.
In the time of Chaucer, nature is being cleansed, rebirth, it is believed that spiritual cleansing
will be carried out thanks to pilgrimage. Here, on the other hand, it is mentioned that none of
this will happen because religion was the most questioned thing in Modernism. Many new
ideas come out. Thoughts and beliefs are beginning to change. In the 'forgetful snow', there is
a deception in winter. So, winter is actually good in appearance. there is more religious
conflict
118 Ther was also a Nonne, a PRIORESSE, 142 But for to speken of hire conscience,
There wasEstate
also asatire:
Nun, a PRIORESS, But to speak of her moral sense,
119 That 143 She was so charitable and so pitous
Thereofare hir 3smylyng
estates.was ful symple
Nobility, Clergyand and
coy; Peasantry. Until Chaucer's time, there was a rigid
Who was very simple and modest in her She was so charitable and so compassionate
smiling; state system to a growing middle class. So, nobility 144 was
She nobility,
wolde wepe, clergy
if thatwassheclergy,
saugh aand
mous
120 peasantry was peasantry. However;
Hire gretteste ooth was but by Seinte Loy; the hierarchy was … because there was a growing
She would weep, if she saw a mouse middle
class who was
Her greatest oathneither
was butnobility
by SaintnorLoy;peasantry. They
145had their
Kaughtvoices
in abecause
trappe, ifthey haddeed
it were money.
or bledde.
121 And she was cleped madame Eglentyne. Caught in a trap, if
So, the structure was kind of a bit ... In the ideal model, the members of all estate are to work it were dead or bled.
And she was
together. calledpoints
Chaucer Madamout to the limitations of146
Eglantine. this HowOfthe
smale houndes
selfish hadde directions
and sinful she that sheoffedde
122 Ful weel she threaten
soong thetoservice She had some small hounds that she fed
individuals break dyvyne,
this down. Chaucer’s work ultimately draws us to question the
She sang the divine service very well, 147 With rosted flessh, or milk and wastel-breed.
123 proper bonds
Entuned in hirof community.
nose ful semely;Chaucer makes us questions all theroasted
With groups. Heor
meat, gets
milkout attention
and fine white
toIntoned
the silfulness of members lust, greed,
in her nose in a very polite manner; and pride. Rivalry
bread. among the members threatens the
124 group
And Frenssh she spak ful faire and fetisly, 153 Hir mouth ful smal, and therto softe and
And she spoke French very well and elegantly reed.
125 To Canterbury,
After the scole ofShrine
Stratfordof atte
SaintBowe,
Thomas Becket Also, existenceHer mouthitself
veryis small,
a pilgrimage to our
and moreover soft and
true home we saw that already
In the manner of Stratford at the Bow, at play in Chaucer’s.
red.
126 For Frenssh of Parys was to hire unknowe. 154 But sikerly she hadde a fair forheed;
ForWhat
French does the
of Paris journey
was stand for in Canterbury?
to her unknown. But surely she had a fair forehead;
127 At mete wel ytaught was she with alle; 155 It was almoost a spanne brood, I trowe;
1- The journey with the pilgrimage, the spiritual birth.It was almost nine inches broad, I believe;
At meals she was well taught indeed;
128 She 2-leet The main from
no morsel aim of hirour journey
lippes falle, is to reach
156our true
For,home.
hardily,So,sheexistence is already a
was nat undergrowe.
journey.
She let no morsel fall from her lips, For, certainly, she was not undergrown.
129 Ne wette hir fyngres in hir sauce depe; 157 Ful fetys was hir cloke, as I was war.
Nor wet her fingers deep in her sauce; Her cloak was very well made , as I was
130 Wel koude she carie a morsel and wel kepe aware.
She well knew how to carry a morsel (to her 158 Of smal coral aboute hire arm she bar
mouth) and take good care About her arm she bore of small coral
131 That no drope ne fille upon hire brest. 159 A peire of bedes, gauded al with grene,
That no drop fell upon her breast. A set of beads, adorned with large green beads,
132 In curteisie was set ful muchel hir lest. 160 And theron heng a brooch of gold ful sheene,
Her greatest pleasure was in good manners. And thereon hung a brooch of very bright
133 Hir over-lippe wyped she so clene gold,
She wiped her upper lip so clean 161 On which ther was first write a crowned A,
134 That in hir coppe ther was no ferthyng sene On which there was first written an A with a
That in her cup there was seen no tiny bit crown,
135 Of grece, whan she dronken hadde hir 162 And after Amor vincit omnia.
draughte. And after "Love conquers all."
Of grease, when she had drunk her drink. 148 But soore wepte she if oon of hem were deed,
136 Ful semely after hir mete she raughte. But sorely she wept if one of them were dead,
She reached for her food in a very seemly The Nun Prioress
149 Or if men smoot it with a yerde smerte;
manner. Or if someone smote it smartly with a stick;
137 And sikerly she was of greet desport, 150 And al was conscience and tendre herte.
And surely she was of excellent deportment, And all was feeling and tender heart.
138 And ful plesaunt, and amyable of port, 151 Ful semyly hir wympul pynched was,
And very pleasant, and amiable in demeanor, Her wimple was pleated in a very seemly
139 And peyned hire to countrefete cheere manner,
And she took pains to imitate the manners 152 Hir nose tretys, hir eyen greye as glas,
140 Of court, and to been estatlich of manere, Her nose well formed, her eyes gray as glass,
Of court, and to be dignified in behavior,
141 And to ben holden digne of reverence.
And to be considered worthy of reverence.
Analysis:
With us ther was a DOCTOUR OF PHISIK;
With us there was a DOCTOR OF
MEDICINE
412 In al this world ne was ther noon hym lik,
In all this world there was no one like him,
413 To speke of phisik and of surgerye,
To speak of medicine and of surgery,
414 For he was grounded in astronomye.
For he was instructed in astronomy.
415 He kepte his pacient a ful greet deel
He took care of his patient very many
times
416 In houres by his magyk natureel.
In (astronomically suitable) hours by (use
of) his natural science.
417 Wel koude he fortunen the ascendent
He well knew how to calculate the
planetary position
418 Of his ymages for his pacient.
Of his astronomical talismans for his
patient.
419 He knew the cause of everich maladye,
He knew the cause of every malady,
420 Were it of hoot, or coold, or moyste, or
drye,
Were it of hot, or cold, or moist, or dry
elements,
421 And where they engendred, and of what
humour.
And where they were engendered, and by
what bodily fluid.
422 He was a verray, parfit praktisour:
He was a truly, perfect practitioner: The Doctor
423 The cause yknowe, and of his harm the
roote,
The cause known, and the source of his
(patient's) harm,
424 Anon he yaf the sike man his boote.
Straightway he gave the sick man his
remedy.
425 Ful redy hadde he his apothecaries
He had his apothecaries all ready
426 To sende hym drogges and his letuaries,
To send him drugs and his electuaries,
427 For ech of hem made oother for to wynne
--
For each of them made the other to profit --
428 Hir frendshipe nas nat newe to bigynne.
Their friendship was not recently begun.
429 Wel knew he the olde Esculapius,
He well knew the old Aesculapius,
429 Wel knew he the olde Esculapius,
He well knew the old Aesculapius, Analysis:
430 And Deyscorides, and eek Rufus,
And Dioscorides, and also Rufus,
431 Olde Ypocras, Haly, and Galyen,
Old Hippocrates, Haly, and Galen,
432 Serapion, Razis, and Avycen,
Serapion, Rhazes, and Avicenna,
433 Averrois, Damascien, and Constantyn,
Averroes, John the Damascan, and
Constantine,
434 Bernard, and Gatesden, and Gilbertyn.
Bernard, and Gaddesden, and Gilbertus.
435 Of his diete mesurable was he,
He was moderate in his diet,
436 For it was of no superfluitee,
For it was of no excess,
437 But of greet norissyng and digestible.
But greatly nourishing and digestible.
438 His studie was but litel on the Bible.
His study was but little on the Bible.
439 In sangwyn and in pers he clad was al,
He was clad all in red and in blue,
440 Lyned with taffata and with sendal.
Lined with taffeta and with silk.
441 And yet he was but esy of dispence;
And yet he was moderate in spending;
442 He kepte that he wan in pestilence.
He kept what he earned in (times of)
plague.
443 For gold in phisik is a cordial,
Since in medicine gold is a restorative for
the heart,
444 Therefore he lovede gold in special.
Therefore he loved gold in particular.
Monk
165 A MONK ther was, a fair for the maistrie, 200 He was a lord 204ful fatNow
and incerteinly
good poynt;
he was a fair prelaat;
183
He was a Andplump
very I seydeNowhisand
lord opinion
certainly
in goodwaswas
he good.
a handsome
There was a MONK, an extremely fine And I said his opinion was good.
one, condition; ecclesiastical dignitary;
166 An outridere, that lovede venerie, 201 His184 What
eyen stepe,
205 and sholde he studie
rollynge
He was nat
in his and
pale asmake
heed, a forpyned goost.
hymselven
His eyes were wood,
prominent,
He was
and not
rolling
pale in
ashis
a tormented spirit.
An outrider (a monk with business outside Why should heswan
studyloved
and make himself
the monastery), who loved hunting, head, 206 A fat he best of any roost.
202 crazy,
That stemed as a forneys
A fatofswan
a leed;
loved he best of any roast.
167 A manly man, to been an abbot able. 185 Upon a book in cloystre alwey to poure,
A virile man, qualified to be an abbot. Which gleamed207 like His
a furnace
palfrey under
wasaas broun as is a berye.
cauldron; Always toHis pore uponhorse
saddle a bookwasin as
thebrown
cloister,
as is a
168 Ful many a deyntee hors hadde he in 186 Or swynken with his handes, and laboure,
stable, 203 His bootes souple,
berry. his hors in greet estaat.
Or work
His boots supple, his with
horsehis in hands,
excellentand labor,
He had very many fine horses in his stable, 187 As Austyn bit? How shal the world be
169 And whan he rood, men myghte his condition.
served?
brydel heere As Augustine commands? How shall the
And when he rode, one could hear his world be served?
bridle 188 Lat Austyn have his swynk to hym
170 Gynglen in a whistlynge wynd als cleere reserved!
Jingle in a whistling wind as clear Let Augustine have his work reserved to
171 And eek as loude as dooth the chapel belle him!
And also as loud as does the chapel belle 189 Therfore he was a prikasour aright:
172 Ther as this lord was kepere of the celle. Therefore he was indeed a vigorous
Where this lord was prior of the horseman:
subordinate monastery. 190 Grehoundes he hadde as swift as fowel in
173 The reule of Seint Maure or of Seint flight;
Beneit -- He had greyhounds as swift as fowl in
The rule of Saint Maurus or of Saint flight;
Benedict -- 191 Of prikyng and of huntyng for the hare
174 By cause that it was old and somdel streit Of tracking and of hunting for the hare
Because it was old and somewhat strict 192 Was al his lust, for no cost wolde he spare.
175 This ilke Monk leet olde thynges pace, Was all his pleasure, by no means would he
This same Monk let old things pass away, refrain from it.
176 And heeld after the newe world the space. 193 I seigh his sleves purfiled at the hond
And followed the broader customs of I saw his sleeves lined at the hand
modern times. 194 With grys, and that the fyneste of a lond;
177 He yaf nat of that text a pulled hen, With squirrel fur, and that the finest in the
He gave not a plucked hen for that text land;
178 That seith that hunters ben nat hooly 195 And for to festne his hood under his chyn,
men, And to fasten his hood under his chin,
That says that hunters are not holy men, 196 He hadde of gold ywroght a ful curious
179 Ne that a monk, whan he is recchelees, pyn;
Nor that a monk, when he is heedless of He had a very skillfully made pin of gold;
rules, 197 A love-knotte in the gretter ende ther was.
180 Is likned til a fissh that is waterlees -- There was an elaborate knot in the larger
Is like a fish that is out of water -- end.
181 This is to seyn, a monk out of his cloystre. 198 His heed was balled, that shoon as any
This is to say, a monk out of his cloister. glas,
182 But thilke text heeld he nat worth an His head was bald, which shone like any
oystre; glass,
But he considered that same text not worth 199 And eek his face, as he hadde been
an oyster; enoynt.
Analysis:
A Friar
A FRERE ther was, a wantowne and a merye, 231 Therfore in stede of wepynge and preyeres
There was a FRIAR, a pleasure-loving and Therefore instead of weeping and prayers
merry one, 232 Men moote yeve silver to the povre freres.
209 A lymytour, a ful solempne man. One may give silver to the poor friars.
A limiter (with an assigned territory), a very 233 His typet was ay farsed ful of knyves
solemn man. His hood was always stuffed full of knives
210 In alle the ordres foure is noon that kan 234 And pynnes, for to yeven faire wyves.
In all the four orders of friars is no one that And pins, to give to fair wives.
knows 235 And certeinly he hadde a murye note:
211 So muchel of daliaunce and fair langage. And certainly he had a merry voice:
So much of sociability and elegant speech. 236 Wel koude he synge and pleyen on a rote;
212 He hadde maad ful many a mariage He well knew how to sing and play on a rote
He had made very many a marriage (string instrument);
213 Of yonge wommen at his owene cost. 237 Of yeddynges he baar outrely the pris.
Of young women at his own cost. He absolutely took the prize for reciting
214 Unto his ordre he was a noble post. ballads.
He was a noble supporter of his order. 238 His nekke whit was as the flour-de-lys;
215 Ful wel biloved and famulier was he His neck was white as a lily flower;
Very well beloved and familiar was he 239 Therto he strong was as a champioun.
216 With frankeleyns over al in his contree, Furthermore he was strong as a champion
With landowners every where in his country, fighter.
217 And eek with worthy wommen of the toun; 240 He knew the tavernes wel in every toun
And also with worthy women of the town; He knew the taverns well in every town
218 For he hadde power of confessioun, 241 And everich hostiler and tappestere
For he had power of confession, And every innkeeper and barmaid
219 As seyde hymself, moore than a curat, 242 Bet than a lazar or a beggestere,
As he said himself, more than a parish priest, Better than a leper or a beggar-woman,
220 For of his ordre he was licenciat. 243 For unto swich a worthy man as he
For he was licensed by his order. For unto such a worthy man as he
221 Ful swetely herde he confessioun, 244 Acorded nat, as by his facultee,
He heard confession very sweetly, It was not suitable, in view of his official
222 And plesaunt was his absolucioun: position,
And his absolution was pleasant: 245 To have with sike lazars aqueyntaunce.
223 He was an esy man to yeve penaunce, To have acquaintance with sick lepers.
He was a lenient man in giving penance, 246 It is nat honest; it may nat avaunce,
224 Ther as he wiste to have a good pitaunce. It is not respectable; it can not be profitable,
Where he knew he would have a good gift. 247 For to deelen with no swich poraille,
225 For unto a povre ordre for to yive To deal with any such poor people,
For to give to a poor order (of friars) 248 But al with riche and selleres of vitaille.
226 Is signe that a man is wel yshryve; But all with rich people and sellers of
Is a sign that a man is well confessed; victuals.
227 For if he yaf, he dorste make avaunt, He was so dignified in managing his affairs
For if he gave, he (the friar) dared to assert, 282 With his bargaynes and with his
228 He wiste that a man was repentaunt; chevyssaunce.
He knew that a man was repentant;. With his buying and selling and with his
229 For many a man so hard is of his herte, financial deals.
For many a man is so hard in his heart, 283 For sothe he was a worthy man with alle,
230 He may nat wepe, althogh hym soore Truly, he was a worthy man indeed,
smerte. 284 But, sooth to seyn, I noot how men hym
He can not weep, although he painfully calle.
suffers. But, to say the truth, I do not know what men
call him.
Analysis:
X
249 And over al, ther as profit sholde arise, 264 Somwhat he lipsed, for his wantownesse,
And every where, where profit should arise, Somewhat he lisped, for his affectation,
250 Curteis he was and lowely of servyse; 265 To make his Englissh sweete upon his tonge;
He was courteous and graciously humble; To make his English sweet upon his tongue;
251 Ther nas no man nowher so vertuous. 266 And in his harpyng, whan that he hadde
There was no man anywhere so capable (of songe,
such work). And in his harping, when he had sung,
252 He was the beste beggere in his hous; 267 His eyen twynkled in his heed aryght
He was the best beggar in his house; His eyes twinkled in his head exactly
252a [And yaf a certeyn ferme for the graunt; 268 As doon the sterres in the frosty nyght.
[And he gave a certain fee for his grant (of As do the stars in the frosty night.
begging rights); 269 This worthy lymytour was cleped Huberd.
252a Noon of his bretheren cam ther in his This worthy friar was called Huberd.
haunt;] 270 A MARCHANT was ther with a forked berd,
None of his brethren came there in his territory;] There was a MERCHANT with a forked beard,
253 For thogh a wydwe hadde noght a sho, 271 In mottelee, and hye on horse he sat;
For though a widow had not a shoe,
Wearing parti-colored cloth, and proudly he
254 So plesaunt was his "In principio,"
sat on his horse;
So pleasant was his "In the beginning,"
255 Yet wolde he have a ferthyng, er he wente. 272 Upon his heed a Flaundryssh bever hat,
Yet he would have a farthing, before he went Upon his head (he wore a) Flemish beaver hat,
away. 273 His bootes clasped faire and fetisly.
256 His purchas was wel bettre than his rente. His boots were buckled handsomely and
His total profit was much more than his elegantly.
proper income. 274 His resons he spak ful solempnely,
257 And rage he koude, as it were right a whelp. His opinions he spoke very solemnly,
And he knew how to frolic, as if he were 275 Sownynge alwey th' encrees of his wynnyng.
indeed a pup. Concerning always the increase of his profits.
258 In love-dayes ther koude he muchel help, 276 He wolde the see were kept for any thyng
He knew how to be much help on days for He wanted the sea to be guarded at all costs
resolving disputes, 277 Bitwixe Middelburgh and Orewelle.
259 For ther he was nat lyk a cloysterer Between Middelburgh (Holland) and Orwell
For there he was not like a cloistered monk (England).
260 With a thredbare cope, as is a povre scoler,
278 Wel koude he in eschaunge sheeldes selle.
With a threadbare cope, like a poor scholar,
He well knew how to deal in foreign
261 But he was lyk a maister or a pope.
But he was like a master of arts or a pope. currencies.
262 Of double worstede was his semycope, 279 This worthy man ful wel his wit bisette:
Of wide (expensive) cloth was his short cloak, This worthy man employed his wit very well:
263 That rounded as a belle out of the presse. 280 Ther wiste no wight that he was in dette,
Which was round as a bell fresh from the There was no one who knew that he was in
clothespress. debt,
281 So estatly was he of his governaunce
Analysis:
The Wife of Bath Description in The Prologue (445-476)
Alyson finally grew so sick of it she tears pages out of the book and punches Janekyn
in the face. He retaliates -intikamını almak- by striking her in the head with his fist, which
causes permanent deafness in one ear. She pretends to be dying, asks for one last kiss, and
then when he leans in, she hits him again. Eventually, they come to an agreement with one
another: she has full governance of the house and estate, she controls the relationship, and he
burns his book.
This prologue has gone on for quite some time, and the Friar and Summoner tease Alyson
about that. Harry Bailey, the Host, quiets them down and tells Alyson to begin her tale.
Opening Of Its Own Prologue
From here;
If women cannot reproduce, virgins cannot
come into the world. Here, too, ironically, she
again supports herself.
172 And whan that I have toold thee forth my tale
And when I have told thee forth my tale
173 Of tribulacion in mariage,
Of suffering in marriage,
174 Of which I am expert in al myn age --
Of which I am expert in all my life --
175 This is to seyn, myself have been the whippe --
This is to say, myself have been the whip --
176 Than maystow chese wheither thou wolt sippe
Than may thou choose whether thou will sip
177 Of thilke tonne that I shal abroche.
Of that same barrel that I shall open.
178 Be war of it, er thou to ny approche;
Beware of it, before thou too near approach;
179 For I shal telle ensamples mo than ten.
For I shall tell examples more than ten.
180 `Whoso that nyl be war by othere men,
`Whoever will not be warned by (the examples
of) other men,
181 By hym shul othere men corrected be.'
Shall be an example by which other men shall
be corrected.' From here;
182 The same wordes writeth Ptholomee; She also supports her side by
The same words writes Ptholomy; referring Ptholomy. However; it
183 Rede in his Almageste, and take it there." says that there is no such thing in
Read in his Almagest, and take it there." his writings, that’s a foul accuse.
Analysis:
In Prologue, it can be seen the autobiography the Wife of Bath.
From here;
Her very first word that “experience” is very important because she needs to
establish her authority. She also supports her side by referring
She backs up her claims by referencing the Bible or the works of antiquity. it says that there is no
Ptholomy. However;
such thing in his writings, that’s a foul
Her reference to Ptolemy’s Almageste, for instance, is completely erroneouss. It is not
accuse.
correct. There is a parallel between the Wife of Bath and the…the Priest because they
also read the Bible according to their wishes. For instance, they sell heaven, but there's
nothing like that in the Bible.
The phrase she attributes to that book appears nowhere in the work.
Lack of real scholarship, but also convey Chaucer’s mockery of the churchmen
present, who often misused Scripture to justify their devious actions.
Marriage:
Marriage was one of the basic sacraments, and the medieval Church’s teachings were
clear. Marriage was for life (the traditional ‘till death us do part’), and had to be
undertaken devoutly and for the purpose of begetting children. The Wife of Bath,
although not definitely outside the letter of the law, was at odds with its spirit. She
seems to treat marriage as an opportunity for self-advancement, she is interested in its
sexual rather than its procreative aspect, and she welcomes the opportunity to be
widowed and re-married.
Women in medieval society could only gain power and money through their husbands.
The Wife of Bath both goes against and conforms to stereotypes: though she takes
power over her husbands, she also admits to marrying solely for money.
The medieval Christian view held strongly that women were inferior and subservient
to men, in both social and spiritual terms. In this sense the Wife is even more in
conflict with the traditional attitudes of her time, because she champions the cause of
women and even argues that they should rule over men – a stance that could well be
seen as heretical. Again, the audience would have found this entertaining.
Almost all medieval literature was expected to have a purpose – that is, to be
something beyond just entertainment. Most commonly it had a moral or directly
religious purpose. Chaucer’s tales would be expected to offer moral teaching or
guidance, and the Wife of Bath, as a character engaged in a Christian pilgrimage,
could be expected to deliver a Christian message. The character herself would be taken
more as a type or stereotype; as representative rather than individual.
5- Does she tale which is very compatible with her character or not?
21:
There are many other tales on Canterbury Tales that related to marriage but the Wife of
Bath is one of the radical ones. Chaucer seems to present a whole range of opinions and
attitudes, and the Wife of Bath’s is one of the most extreme. She does not support the
traditional view that the man is dominant. -from the beginning to the end she does not support the
dominance of men-
In the prologue, she says ‘I mean to rule over men, and at the end she says we are both
happy if we that happen so’. For her, nothing less than female dominance is acceptable, and
both her prologue and her tale carry the same message. The more likely alternative is that
many of the audience would have seen her as a representative figure, embodying exactly the
kind of vices and faults that so many medieval authorities ascribed to women. She has many
vices and faults ascribed to women, she is an outstanding woman, she is not an ordinary
medieval woman. So, she needs to be an outcast as well.
The medieval Church blamed Eve for the Fall of Man and was deeply misogynistic; for a
woman to claim even equality with men would have been unthinkable. -how can you imagine a
world where women rule over men, when women are the reason humanity was expelled from heaven?-
In order to voices unthinkable idea, you should integrate them into all thinkable ides.
The knight:
The knight simply represents traditional male power and domination over women, which will
be reversed by the end of the tale. That's a very ironic point because woman marries with
30:10 30:45.. After his initial act of rape, he becomes subservient to female characters, first
‘the queen and other ladies’ of Arthur’s court, then the hag, who is the only person who can
save him.
The hag:
This supernatural figure, with the power to transform herself into a beautiful woman at the
end, is partially an image of the Wife of Bath herself, but more generally the representation of
the dominant woman who can behave better than men and who has absolute power over their
fate and their behaviour. She is not a consistent character. She is a counterpart for the Wife in
her amused contempt for men, best seen when she criticises her husband’s behaviour on their
wedding night (lines 1086–95)
Except for last husband, none of the characters in the tale is named, which immediately
indicates that it is their function that matters, not their individuality.
Why?
Not their individuality, but they become representative of something. So, what matters is what
they do, not their individuality.
1- According to the above passage, how does she describe her 5th husband? What
does he represent?
Here, we see that her 5th husband is very traditional and dominant. We can understand
it from 668th line. He is the representation of medieval misogyny.
2- How does he behave against women? What are his opinions regarding
womanhood?
Woman thinks a lift out of his book, and he gets very angry, and he hits the woman's
ear. That's why she becomes deaf and it represents traditional value of manhood like
they are over women, they can do whatever they like, they can hit them, they can
behave them very badly and there is no problem with that because they have all the
authority and they have all the rights. The book he is reading is called Valerie and
Theophrastus and it is about weak women and it becomes very important to him. In
other words, this book is a complete anti-feminist, and we can understand this in the
685th line.
3- All the men write about women, what would have happened if women wrote
about men? - in the last part-
Writing is the symbol of authority and superiority.
Apart from the Wife, Jankin is the only character that is named within the story but he
too is more a stereotype than an individual. He is the representation of medieval
misogyny specifically because he possesses a book in which are bound all the major
anti-feminist writings of the period. 'Valerie and Theofraste': an anti-feminist work that
was bound in an anthology. He thus tries to assert dominance over his wife. This
culminates in their fight.